Wachovia Corporation
Schedule 14A
(Rule 14A-101)
Information Required In Proxy Statement
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential, For Use of
the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy
Statement
o Definitive Additional
Materials
o Soliciting Material Under
Rule 14a-12
|
|
|
WACHOVIA CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In
Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
þ
|
No fee required
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(4)
and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
|
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
March 9, 2007
Dear Stockholder:
On behalf of the board of directors, we are pleased to invite
you to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in Charlotte, North
Carolina, on Tuesday, April 17, 2007, at
9:30 a.m. The notice of meeting and proxy statement on
the following pages contain information about the meeting.
In addition to the matters contained in this proxy statement, we
will also review operating results for the past year and present
other information concerning Wachovia. The meeting should be
interesting and informative, and we hope you will be able to
attend.
We are again pleased to offer record holders of common stock
(those who hold shares directly registered in their own names
and not in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee) the
option of voting through the telephone or Internet.
In order to ensure your shares are voted at the meeting, please
return the enclosed proxy card at your earliest convenience or
vote through the telephone or Internet. Voting procedures are
described on the proxy card. Every stockholders vote is
important.
Sincerely yours,
G. Kennedy Thompson
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Wachovia Corporation, 301 South College Street, Charlotte, North
Carolina 28288
Wachovia
Corporation
301
South College Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28288
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
TO BE HELD ON APRIL 17, 2007
March 9, 2007
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at the Charlotte
Convention Center, 501 South College Street, Charlotte,
North Carolina 28202, on Tuesday, April 17, 2007, at
9:30 a.m., to consider the following:
|
|
|
|
|
A Wachovia proposal to elect the eight nominees named in the
attached proxy statement as directors, six nominees to serve as
Class III directors with terms expiring at the 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, one nominee to serve as a Class II
director with a term expiring at the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, and one nominee to serve as a Class I
director with a term expiring at the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, in each case until their successors are duly
elected and qualified.
|
|
|
|
A Wachovia proposal to amend Wachovias articles of
incorporation to eliminate the provisions classifying the terms
of its board of directors.
|
|
|
|
A Wachovia proposal to amend Wachovias articles of
incorporation to provide for majority voting in uncontested
director elections.
|
|
|
|
A Wachovia proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as
auditors for the year 2007.
|
|
|
|
A number of stockholder proposals, which management and
Wachovias board of directors oppose.
|
|
|
|
Such other business as may properly come before the meeting
or any adjournments.
|
Only holders of record of Wachovia common stock on
February 12, 2007, are entitled to notice of and to vote at
the meeting.
By order of the board of directors,
Mark C. Treanor
Secretary
Whether or not you plan to attend, please either return the
enclosed proxy card or vote through the telephone or Internet
voting procedures described on your proxy card, to ensure your
shares are voted at the meeting. Your vote is important, whether
you own a few shares or many.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
PROXY
STATEMENT
General
Information
The enclosed proxy card is solicited on behalf of the board of
directors in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held at the Charlotte Convention Center, 501 South
College Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202, on Tuesday,
April 17, 2007, at 9:30 a.m., and at any adjournment,
referred to as the meeting. The proxy may be used
whether or not you attend the meeting. If you are a registered
stockholder (that is, you hold shares directly registered in
your own name), you may also vote by telephone or through the
Internet, by following the instructions described on your proxy
card. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or
other nominee, referred to as street name, you will
receive separate voting instructions with your proxy materials.
Although most brokers and nominees offer telephone and Internet
voting, availability and specific procedures will depend on
their voting arrangements.
This proxy statement, the enclosed proxy card and
Wachovias 2006 Annual Report to Stockholders are being
first mailed to our stockholders on or about March 9, 2007.
The merger of Wachovia Corporation (legacy Wachovia)
and First Union Corporation (legacy First Union) was
effective September 1, 2001. As the surviving corporate
entity in the merger, legacy First Union changed its name to
Wachovia Corporation on the date of the merger.
Whenever we use the Wachovia name in this proxy
statement, we mean the combined company and, before the merger,
legacy First Union, unless indicated otherwise.
Your vote is very important. For this reason, the board of
directors is requesting that you permit your common stock to be
represented at the meeting by the individuals named on the
enclosed proxy card. This proxy statement contains important
information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the
matters brought before the meeting. Please read it carefully.
ABOUT THE
MEETING
Who Can
Vote
You may vote if you owned Wachovia common stock as of the close
of business on the record date, February 12, 2007. Each
share of Wachovia common stock is entitled to one vote. At the
close of business on February 12, 2007,
1,906,881,015 shares of Wachovia common stock were
outstanding and eligible to vote. The enclosed proxy card shows
the number of shares that you are entitled to vote. If you own
any shares in Wachovias Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
Purchase Plan, the enclosed proxy includes the number of shares
you have in that plan on the record date for the meeting, as
well as the number of shares directly registered in your name,
including those held through our direct registration service.
Your individual vote is confidential and will not be disclosed
to persons other than those recording the vote or as applicable
law may require.
How Do I
Vote
You have four voting options:
|
|
|
|
|
Over the Internet, which we encourage if you have Internet
access, at the address shown on your proxy card;
|
|
|
|
By telephone through the number shown on your proxy card;
|
|
|
|
By mail by completing, signing, dating and returning the
enclosed proxy card; or
|
|
|
|
By attending the meeting and voting your shares in person.
|
Even if you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote
your shares by proxy. If you choose to attend the meeting,
please bring proof of stock ownership and proof of
identification for entrance to the meeting.
1
If you hold your Wachovia shares in nominee or street
name, your ability to vote by Internet or telephone
depends on the voting process of the bank, broker or other
nominee. Please follow their directions carefully. If you want
to vote Wachovia shares that you hold in street name at the
meeting, you must request a legal proxy from your bank, broker
or other nominee that holds your shares and present that proxy
and proof of identification for entrance to the meeting.
Every vote is important! Please vote your shares promptly.
What Am I
Voting On
There are eight proposals that will be presented for your
consideration at the meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
Electing eight directors;
|
|
|
|
Amending Wachovias articles of incorporation to eliminate
the provisions classifying the terms of our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
Amending Wachovias articles of incorporation to provide
for majority voting in uncontested director elections;
|
|
|
|
Ratifying the appointment of KPMG LLP as Wachovias
auditors for 2007;
|
|
|
|
If properly presented, four stockholder proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regarding a non-binding stockholder vote ratifying executive
compensation;
|
|
|
|
Regarding qualifications of director nominees;
|
|
|
|
Regarding reporting political contributions; and
|
|
|
|
Regarding separating the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer.
|
The first four proposals have been submitted on behalf of
Wachovias board of directors. The remaining proposals have
been submitted on behalf of certain stockholders. Other business
may be addressed at the meeting if it properly comes before the
meeting. However, we are not aware of any such other business.
Can I
Change My Vote
You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time
before the time voting begins on any proposal. You may do this
by either giving our Corporate Secretary written notice of your
revocation, submitting a new signed proxy card with a later
date, voting on a later date by telephone or by the Internet
(only your last telephone or Internet proxy is counted), or by
attending the meeting and voting in person. However, your
attendance at the meeting will not automatically revoke your
proxy; you must specifically revoke your proxy. If your shares
are held in nominee or street name, you should contact your
bank, broker or other nominee regarding the revocation of
proxies or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your bank,
broker or other nominee giving you the right to vote your
shares, you may change your vote by attending the meeting and
voting in person.
Quorum
Needed To Hold The Meeting
In order to conduct the meeting, a majority of Wachovia shares
entitled to vote must be present in person or by proxy. This is
called a quorum. If you return valid proxy instructions or vote
in person at the meeting, you will be considered part of the
quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be
counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of
determining a quorum. New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
rules allow banks, brokers or other nominees to vote shares held
by them for a customer on matters that the NYSE determines to be
routine, even though the bank, broker or nominee has not
received instructions from the customer. A broker
non-vote occurs when a bank, broker or other nominee
has not received voting instructions from the customer and the
bank, broker or nominee cannot vote the customers shares
because the matter is not considered routine under NYSE rules.
2
Counting
Your Vote
If you provide specific voting instructions, your shares will be
voted as instructed. If you hold shares in your name and sign
and return a proxy card or vote by telephone or Internet without
giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted
as recommended by our board of directors. If you hold your
shares in your name and do not return valid proxy instructions
or vote in person at the meeting, your shares will not be voted.
If you hold your Wachovia shares in the name of a bank, broker
or other nominee, and you do not give that nominee instructions
on how you want your shares to be voted, the nominee generally
has the authority to vote your shares on certain
routine matters as described above. At the meeting,
proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 are deemed routine
which means that the nominee can vote your shares on those
proposals if you do not timely provide instructions for voting
your shares. However, the remaining proposals are deemed
non-routine which means that the nominee cannot vote
your shares on those proposals if you do not timely provide
instructions for voting your shares.
What
Vote Is Needed
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the
meeting. Plurality means that the nominees receiving
the largest number of votes cast are elected as directors up to
the maximum number of directors who are nominated to be elected
at the meeting. Shares cannot be voted for a greater number of
persons than the number of nominees named in this proxy
statement, and at our meeting the maximum number of directors to
be elected is eight. Shares not voted, whether by marking
ABSTAIN on your proxy card or otherwise, will have
no impact on the election of directors. Unless a properly
executed proxy card is marked WITHHOLD authority as
to any or all nominees, the proxy given will be voted
FOR each of the nominees for director.
In February 2006, our board of directors amended its Corporate
Governance Guidelines to provide for a new policy regarding
director elections. The policy provides that in an uncontested
election, any nominee for director who receives a greater number
of votes withheld for his or her election than votes
for his or her election must promptly tender his or
her resignation to the Corporate Governance &
Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance &
Nominating Committee will consider the resignation and recommend
to the board whether to accept or reject it. The board will act
on the Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committees recommendation within 90 days following
the date of the stockholders meeting at which the election
occurred, and will promptly disclose its decision, including an
explanation of the process by which the decision was reached
and, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting the tendered
resignation, in a publicly filed SEC filing. Any director
tendering his or her resignation would not participate in the
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committees and
the boards deliberations. In deciding whether to accept or
reject any tendered resignation, the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee and the board will
consider all factors they deem relevant, including the reasons,
if known, why stockholders withheld or were
requested to withhold votes from the director, the
directors length of service and qualifications, the
directors contributions to Wachovia, and the current mix
of skills and attributes of the directors on the board. If the
board does not accept a tendered resignation, it may elect to
address the underlying stockholder concerns related to
withheld votes or take any other action it deems
appropriate and in the best interests of Wachovia and its
stockholders. If a majority of the members of the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee received a majority
withheld vote at the same election, then one or more independent
directors who did not receive a majority withheld vote would be
added to the Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committee, or a special committee of independent directors would
be formed to consider resignation offers. This policy will be in
effect for the vote on Proposal 1 at the meeting. As
described in Proposal 3, our board is proposing to amend
Wachovias articles of incorporation to provide for
majority voting in uncontested director elections. If
stockholders approve Proposal 3 at the meeting, the new
majority vote standard would apply in uncontested elections of
directors following the meeting. See Proposal 3.
For Proposal 2, Wachovias articles of incorporation
require that at least 80% of the shares outstanding and entitled
to vote at the meeting must vote in favor of amending the
articles of incorporation to eliminate
3
the provisions classifying the terms of our board of directors.
Abstentions and votes not cast will have the same effect as
votes against Proposal 2. Therefore, the board urges
stockholders to vote their shares.
A majority of votes cast at the meeting is required to approve
the remaining proposals, including Proposal 3 to amend our
articles of incorporation to provide for majority voting in
uncontested director elections. Abstentions will not be counted
as votes cast for these proposals. In addition, broker
non-votes will not be counted as votes cast
for Proposals 5-8.
Our
Voting Recommendations
Our board of directors recommends that you vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR each of our nominees to the board of directors;
|
|
|
|
FOR amending our articles of incorporation to
eliminate the provisions classifying the terms of our board of
directors;
|
|
|
|
FOR amending our articles of incorporation to
provide for majority voting in uncontested director elections;
|
|
|
|
FOR ratifying KPMG LLP as our auditors;
|
|
|
|
AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding a
non-binding stockholder vote ratifying executive compensation;
|
|
|
|
AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding
qualifications of director nominees;
|
|
|
|
AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding reporting
political contributions; and
|
|
|
|
AGAINST the stockholder proposal regarding
separating the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
|
Proxy cards that are timely signed, dated and returned but do
not contain instructions on how you want to vote will be voted
in accordance with our board of directors recommendations.
Voting
Results
The preliminary voting results will be announced at the meeting.
The final voting results will be published in our quarterly
report on
Form 10-Q
for the first quarter of fiscal year 2007.
Cost of
This Proxy Solicitation
Wachovia will pay the costs of the solicitation. We have hired
Georgeson Inc. as proxy solicitors to assist in the proxy
solicitation and tabulation. Their base fee is $22,500, plus
expenses and an additional fee per proxy tabulated. We may also,
upon request, reimburse brokerage firms and other persons
representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in
forwarding voting materials to their customers who are
beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. In
addition to Wachovia soliciting proxies by mail, over the
Internet and by the telephone, our board members, officers and
employees may solicit proxies on our behalf, without additional
compensation.
Delivery
of Proxy Materials
To reduce the expenses of delivering duplicate proxy materials
to our stockholders, we are relying upon SEC rules that permit
us to deliver only one proxy statement and annual report to
multiple stockholders who share an address unless we received
contrary instructions from any stockholder at that address. If
you share an address with another stockholder and have received
only one proxy statement and annual report, you may write or
call us as specified below to request a separate copy of these
materials and we will promptly send them to you at no cost to
you. For future meetings, if you hold shares directly registered
in your own name, you may request separate copies of our proxy
statement and annual report, or request that we send only one
set of these materials to you if you are receiving multiple
copies, by contacting us at:
4
Investor Relations, Wachovia Corporation, 301 South College
Street, Charlotte, North Carolina
28288-0206,
or by telephoning us at
(704) 374-6782.
If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, or other
nominee and you wish to receive separate copies of our proxy
statement and annual report, or request that they send only one
set of these materials to you if you are receiving multiple
copies, please contact the bank, broker or other nominee.
Electronic
Delivery of Proxy Materials
You can also access Wachovias proxy statement and 2006
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
which includes our annual report to stockholders, via the
Internet at www.wachovia.com under the tab About
WachoviaInvestor Relations. For next years
stockholders meeting, you can help us save significant
printing and mailing expenses by consenting to access the proxy
statement, proxy card and annual report electronically over the
Internet. If you hold your shares in your own name (instead of
through a bank, broker or other nominee), you can choose this
option by following the instructions at the Internet voting
website at http://proxy.georgeson.com, which has been
established for you to vote your shares for the meeting. If you
choose to receive your proxy materials and annual report
electronically, then prior to next years
stockholders meeting you will receive an
e-mail
notification when the proxy materials and annual report are
available for on-line review over the Internet, as well as the
instructions for voting electronically over the Internet. Your
choice for electronic distribution will remain in effect until
you revoke it by sending a written request to: Investor
Relations, Wachovia Corporation, 301 South College Street,
Charlotte, North Carolina
28288-0206.
New SEC rules, which will be in effect for next years
stockholders meeting, also will permit us to deliver your
proxy materials to you electronically over the Internet.
A copy of our 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
will be provided to you without charge (except for exhibits)
upon written request to Wachovia Corporation, Investor
Relations, 301 South College Street, Charlotte, NC
28288-0206.
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
General
Information and Nominees
Our articles of incorporation require Wachovias board of
directors to be divided into three classes. At each annual
meeting of stockholders, you elect the members of one of the
three classes to three-year terms. Our directors determine the
size of the board, but the total number of directors cannot be
fewer than nine or more than 30. For purposes of the meeting,
the number of directors is fixed at 18, with six directors
in Class I, six directors in Class II, and six
directors in Class III.
The terms of the directors serving in Class III will expire
at the meeting and the terms of the directors serving in
Classes I and II will expire at the 2008 and 2009 annual
meetings of stockholders, respectively. Robert J. Brown,
currently a Class III director, will retire as a director
as of the meeting and consequently will not stand for election
at the meeting.
John T. Casteen, III, Maryellen C. Herringer, Joseph
Neubauer, Timothy D. Proctor, Van L. Richey, and Dona Davis
Young are being nominated to serve as directors of
Class III with terms expiring at the 2010 annual meeting of
stockholders. Mr. Richey currently serves as a Class I
director and is moving to Class III to keep the size of
each class as equal as possible. Jerry Gitt is being nominated
to serve as a director in Class II with a term expiring at
the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders, and Ernest S. Rady,
currently a Class III director, is being nominated to serve as a
director in Class I with a term expiring at the 2008 annual
meeting of stockholders.
The board, with the assistance of the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee, has conducted an
evaluation of whether Wachovias classified board structure
continues to be in the best interests of Wachovia and its
stockholders. In conducting its evaluation, the board considered
that the general purposes of the classified board are to promote
stability and continuity in leadership on the board and provide
the board with a greater opportunity to protect the interests of
stockholders from abusive takeover tactics in the event of an
unsolicited takeover offer. The board also considered that some
corporate governance
5
experts and institutional stockholders believe that a
classified board reduces accountability to stockholders because
it prevents stockholders from evaluating all directors on an
annual basis. In addition, the board recognized that the annual
election of directors continues to evolve as a best
practice in corporate governance. After a careful review,
the board has determined that it would be in the best interests
of Wachovia and its stockholders to take steps to eliminate the
classified board. Accordingly, the board has recommended
stockholders approve Proposal 2 at the meeting, which if
adopted would amend Wachovias articles of incorporation to
eliminate the provisions requiring a classified board of
directors. If adopted at the meeting, Wachovia directors would
stand for election annually, beginning at Wachovias 2008
annual meeting of stockholders. Approval of Proposal 2 to
amend our articles of incorporation to declassify the board
requires the affirmative vote of at least 80% of Wachovias
outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the
meeting. See Proposal 2.
In the event stockholders approve Proposal 2 by the
requisite number of affirmative votes, Wachovias articles
of incorporation will be amended to eliminate the provisions
classifying the terms of the board. In such case, as described
in Proposal 2, it is expected that at the 2008 annual
meeting of stockholders, all Wachovia directors, including those
whose terms do not expire at that meeting, will be nominated to
serve a one-year term. In the event stockholders do not approve
Proposal 2 by the requisite number of affirmative votes,
Wachovias articles of incorporation will remain the same
as they currently are and the directors elected at the meeting
will serve for the applicable term for the Class in which they
are nominated.
Directors who reach retirement age (70) during their term
in office are to retire from the board at the annual meeting of
stockholders next following their 70th birthday, subject to
the board authorizing the retirement to be deferred when deemed
appropriate.
Should any nominee be unavailable for election by reason of
death or other unexpected occurrence, the enclosed proxy, to the
extent permitted by applicable law, may be voted with
discretionary authority in connection with the nomination by the
board and the election of any substitute nominee. In addition,
the board may reduce the number of directors to be elected at
the meeting.
Proxies, unless indicated to the contrary, will be voted
FOR the election of the six nominees named below as
Class III directors of Wachovia with terms expiring at the
2010 annual meeting of stockholders, FOR the
election of the one nominee named below as a Class II
director of Wachovia with a term expiring at the 2009 annual
meeting of stockholders, and FOR the election of the
one nominee named below as a Class I director of Wachovia
with a term expiring at the 2008 annual meeting of
stockholders.
All of the nominees are currently directors. Listed below are
the names of the eight nominees to serve as directors and the
ten incumbent directors who will be continuing in office
following the meeting, together with: their ages; their
principal occupations during the past five years; any other
directorships they serve with any company with a class of
securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the 1934 Act), or
subject to Section 15(d) of the 1934 Act or any investment
company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940; and
the year during which each was first elected a director of
Wachovia.
6
NOMINEES
FOR ELECTION AS CLASS III DIRECTORSTERMS EXPIRING IN
2010
|
|
|
|
|
JOHN T. CASTEEN, III
(63). President of the
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. A director
since 2001.
|
|
|
MARYELLEN C. HERRINGER
(63).
Attorney-at-law,
Piedmont, California. Previously, Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary, APL Limited, Oakland, California,
an intermodal shipping and rail transportation company, until
1997. Director, ABM Industries Incorporated, Pacific
Gas & Electric Company and PG&E Corporation. A
director since October 2006.
|
|
|
JOSEPH NEUBAUER
(65). Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, ARAMARK Holdings Corporation,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, a service management company, since
January 2007. Previously, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
ARAMARK Corporation, from September 2004 to January 2007,
Executive Chairman of the Board, from January 2004 to September
2004, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ARAMARK
Corporation, prior to January 2004. Director, ARAMARK
Corporation, Federated Department Stores, Inc. and Verizon
Communications, Inc. A director since 1996.
|
|
|
TIMOTHY D. PROCTOR
(57). General Counsel
of Diageo plc, London, England, a premium spirits, beer and wine
company, since January 2000. A director since November 2006.
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
VAN L. RICHEY
(57). President and
Chief Executive Officer, American Cast Iron Pipe Company,
Birmingham, Alabama, a manufacturer of products for the
waterworks, capital goods and energy industries. A director
since 2004.
|
|
|
DONA DAVIS YOUNG
(53). Chairman (since
April 2003), President (since November 2000) and Chief Executive
Officer (since January 2003) of The Phoenix Companies, Inc.,
Hartford, Connecticut, a provider of wealth management products
and services, and its subsidiary Phoenix Life Insurance Company.
Previously, Chief Operating Officer (February 2001 to January
2003) of The Phoenix Companies, Inc., and President (since
February 2000) and Chief Operating Officer (since February 2001)
of Phoenix Life Insurance Company. Director, Foot Locker, Inc.
and The Phoenix Companies, Inc. A director since 2001.
|
NOMINEE
FOR ELECTION AS A CLASS I DIRECTORTERM EXPIRING IN
2008
|
|
|
|
|
ERNEST S. RADY
(69). Principal
shareholder, manager and consultant to a group of companies
engaged in real estate management and development, property and
casualty insurance and investment management through American
Assets, Inc. (President and founder) and Insurance Company of
the West (Chairman), Irvine, California. Also, Chairman of
Dealer Finance business and California banking business,
Wachovia Corporation, from March 1, 2006 to March 1,
2007. Previously, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Westcorp, and Chairman, WFS Financial Inc, Irvine, California,
commercial banking and automobile finance companies, prior to
March 1, 2006. A director since 2006.
|
NOMINEE
FOR ELECTION AS A CLASS II DIRECTORTERM EXPIRING IN
2009
|
|
|
|
|
JERRY GITT
(64). Retired, Palm
Desert, California. Previously, First Vice President of Equity
Research, Merrill, Lynch & Company, prior to 2000. A
director since October 2006.
|
8
INCUMBENT
CLASS I DIRECTORSTERMS EXPIRING IN 2008
|
|
|
|
|
JOHN D. BAKER, II
(58). President and
Chief Executive Officer, Florida Rock Industries, Inc.,
Jacksonville, Florida, a heavy building materials company.
Director, Florida Rock Industries, Inc. and Patriot
Transportation Holding, Inc. A director since 2001.
|
|
|
PETER C. BROWNING
(65). Lead Director of
Nucor Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina, a steel products
manufacturing company, since May 2006. Previously, Non-Executive
Chairman of Nucor Corporation, prior to May 2006 and Dean,
McColl Graduate School of Business, Queens University of
Charlotte, from March 2002 to May 2005. Director, Acuity Brands
Inc., EnPro Industries, Inc., Lowes Companies, Inc., Nucor
Corporation and The Phoenix Companies, Inc. A director since
2001.
|
|
|
DONALD M. JAMES
(58). Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, Vulcan Materials Company, Birmingham,
Alabama, a construction materials company. Director, The
Southern Company and Vulcan Materials Company. A director since
2004.
|
|
|
G. KENNEDY THOMPSON
(56). Chairman (since
February 2003), President (since December 1999) and Chief
Executive Officer (since April 2000), Wachovia Corporation.
Director, Hewlett-Packard Company and Wachovia Preferred Funding
Corp. A director since 1999.
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
JOHN C. WHITAKER,
JR. (69). Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Inmar, Inc.,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, an information services company.
A director since 2001.
|
INCUMBENT
CLASS II DIRECTORSTERMS EXPIRING IN 2009
|
|
|
|
|
WILLIAM H. GOODWIN,
JR. (66). Chairman and
President, CCA Industries, Inc., Richmond, Virginia, a
diversified holding company. Also, Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Operating Officer of The Riverstone Group,
LLC, Richmond, Virginia, a diversified holding company. A
director since 1993.
|
|
|
ROBERT A. INGRAM
(64). Vice Chairman
Pharmaceuticals, of GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina, a pharmaceutical research and development
company, since January 2003. Also, Chairman of the Board, OSI
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Melville, New York, a biotechnology
company, since January 2003, and Chairman of the Board, Valeant
Pharmaceuticals International, Costa Mesa, California, a
specialty pharmaceutical company focused on neurology,
dermatology and infectious disease, since August 2006.
Previously, Chief Operating Officer and President,
Pharmaceutical Operations, of GlaxoSmithKline plc, from December
2000 to January 2003. Director, Allergan, Inc., Edwards
Lifesciences Corporation, Lowes Companies, Inc., OSI
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Valeant Pharmaceuticals International.
A director since 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MACKEY J. MCDONALD
(60). Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer (and President prior to March 2006), VF
Corporation, Greensboro, North Carolina, an apparel
manufacturer. Director, Hershey Foods Corporation and VF
Corporation. A director since 1997.
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
RUTH G. SHAW
(59). Executive Advisor
to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Duke Energy
Corporation, one of the largest electric power companies in the
United States, Charlotte, North Carolina, since October 2006.
Previously, Group Executive Public Policy and President, Duke
Nuclear, from April 2006 to October 2006, President (from March
2003 to April 2006) and Chief Executive Officer (from October
2004 to April 2006), Duke Power Company, and Executive Vice
President and Chief Administrative Officer, Duke Energy
Corporation, prior to March 2003. Director, The Dow Chemical
Company. A director since 1990.
|
|
|
LANTY L. SMITH
(64). Chairman, Soles
Brower Smith & Co., Greensboro, North Carolina, an
investment and merchant banking firm. Also, Chairman, Precision
Fabrics Group, Inc., Greensboro, North Carolina, a manufacturer
of high technology specification textile products. A director
since 1987.
|
Board
Matters
Wachovias business is managed under the direction and
oversight of the board of directors. The board appoints
Wachovias Chief Executive Officer and its senior
management team who are responsible for the
day-to-day
conduct of Wachovias business. The boards primary
responsibilities, thereafter, are to oversee management and to
exercise its business judgment to act in good faith and in what
each director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of
Wachovia.
Committee
Structure
The board has established various committees to assist the board
in fulfilling its responsibilities. These committees currently
consist of
|
|
|
|
|
the Executive Committee,
|
|
|
|
the Risk Committee,
|
|
|
|
the Management Resources & Compensation Committee,
|
|
|
|
the Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committee, and
|
|
|
|
the Audit Committee.
|
Subject to applicable law and regulatory requirements, the board
may establish additional or different committees from time to
time.
The board has adopted written charters for each of the above
committees, and copies of the current charters for the Audit,
Management Resources & Compensation, Corporate
Governance & Nominating and Risk Committees are
available on Wachovias website at
www.wachovia.com under the tab About
WachoviaInvestor Relations and then under the
heading Corporate GovernanceBoard Committee
Composition, and are available in print to any stockholder
who requests them by contacting us at: Investor Relations,
Wachovia Corporation, 301 South College Street, Charlotte, North
Carolina
28288-0206,
or by
11
telephone at
(704) 374-6782.
The following is additional information regarding each of the
boards existing committees:
Executive Committee. The Executive Committee
held one meeting in 2006. The Committee is authorized, between
meetings of the board, to perform all duties and exercise all
authority of the board, except for those duties and authorities
delegated to other committees of the board or that are
exclusively reserved to the board by our bylaws or by applicable
law. The Executive Committee is not expected to meet frequently,
if at all, and its primary function would be to consider matters
that require immediate attention. The following directors are
the current members of the Committee: Smith (Chair), Browning,
Goodwin, Ingram, Neubauer, Thompson, Whitaker and Young.
Risk Committee. The Risk Committee held six
meetings in 2006. The primary responsibilities of the Risk
Committee are to assist the board in overseeing, and receiving
information regarding, Wachovias policies, procedures and
practices relating to liquidity, interest rate, credit, market
and operational risk. The following directors are the current
members of the Committee: Young (Chair), Goodwin, Herringer,
James, Richey and Whitaker.
Management Resources & Compensation
Committee. The Management Resources &
Compensation Committee (the Compensation Committee)
held eight meetings in 2006. The Compensation Committees
principal responsibilities are described below under
Compensation of Directors and
Compensation Discussion & Analysis and
include assisting the board by reviewing, establishing or making
recommendations to the board, as applicable, regarding employee
compensation, administering various employee benefit plans,
acting as the executive compensation committee, evaluating
management resources, including regarding succession planning,
monitoring compliance of our employment and personnel policies
and studying the compensation of directors and recommending
changes when appropriate. The following directors are the
current members of the Compensation Committee: Shaw (Chair),
Brown, Browning, Ingram, McDonald and Proctor. The board has
determined that all of the members of the Compensation Committee
are independent under the NYSE Corporate Governance Listing
Standards, which we refer to as the NYSE rules, and the
boards Director Independence Standards described below.
Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committee. The Corporate Governance &
Nominating Committee held six meetings in 2006. The Committee
assists the board and management in establishing and maintaining
effective corporate governance practices and procedures,
identifies individuals qualified to become board members, and
recommends to the board the individuals for nomination as
members of the board and its committees. The following directors
are the current members of the Committee: Ingram (Chair),
Browning, Goodwin, McDonald, Neubauer, Shaw and Smith. The board
has determined that all of the members of the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee are independent under
the NYSE rules and the boards Director Independence
Standards.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee held 14
meetings in 2006. The Committees principal
responsibilities are described below under Audit Committee
Report and include assisting the board in overseeing
Wachovias financial reporting process. The following
directors are the current members of the Committee: Neubauer
(Chair), Baker, Casteen, Gitt and Smith. The board has
determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are
independent under the NYSE rules, the boards Director
Independence Standards, and applicable SEC rules and
regulations. The board has also determined that at least one
member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert within the meaning of SEC rules and
regulations, and has designated Mr. Neubauer, the Chair of
the Committee, as the audit committee financial expert.
Meetings
and Attendance
The board held 11 meetings in 2006. In 2006, all of the
directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the board and
the committees on which they served.
12
Corporate
Governance Policies and Practices
Corporate
Governance Guidelines
Wachovia has developed, and operated under, corporate governance
principles and practices that are designed to maximize long-term
stockholder value, align the interests of the board and
management with those of Wachovias stockholders, and
promote the highest ethical conduct among Wachovias
directors and employees. The board has focused on continuing to
build upon Wachovias strong corporate governance
practices, and over the years Wachovia has adopted various
corporate governance enhancements. For example, during the past
few years the board has:
|
|
|
|
|
designated a lead independent director;
|
|
|
|
increased reliance on stock-based compensation for senior
management and the board;
|
|
|
|
|
|
adopted stock ownership guidelines for senior executives and the
board;
|
|
|
|
|
|
adopted a policy in 2006 requiring directors who receive more
votes withheld from their election than
for their election at a meeting of stockholders to
tender their resignation;
|
|
|
|
proposed to amend Wachovias articles of incorporation to
remove the requirement of having a classified board, as
described in Proposal 2;
|
|
|
|
proposed to amend Wachovias articles of incorporation to
provide for majority voting in uncontested director elections,
as described in Proposal 3; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
adopted a policy that requires stockholder approval of future
severance agreements for executive officers that provide for
benefits above certain limits.
|
In April 2003, the board formally adopted written corporate
governance policies, principles and guidelines, known as our
Corporate Governance Guidelines, which reflect many of the
matters mentioned above. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are
not intended to be a static statement of Wachovias
policies, principles and guidelines, but are subject to
continual assessment and refinement as the board may determine
advisable or necessary in view of the best interests of Wachovia
and its stockholders. A copy of the boards Corporate
Governance Guidelines is available on Wachovias website at
www.wachovia.com under the tab About
WachoviaInvestor Relations and then under the
heading Corporate GovernanceCorporate Governance
Guidelines, and is available in print to any stockholder
who requests it by contacting us at: Investor Relations,
Wachovia Corporation, 301 South College Street, Charlotte, North
Carolina
28288-0206,
or by telephone at
(704) 374-6782.
Highlights of portions of the Corporate Governance Guidelines,
as well as some of Wachovias other corporate governance
policies, practices and procedures are described below.
Director
Independence
As described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the board
believes that a substantial majority of the board should consist
of directors who are independent under the NYSE rules, as
determined by the board in its business judgment. As described
below, the board has determined that 17 of the boards
19 current directors and nominees, or approximately 89%,
are independent directors within the meaning of the Director
Independence Standards adopted by the board, the NYSE rules and
the applicable SEC rules and regulations.
The NYSE rules provide that a Wachovia director does not qualify
as independent unless the board of directors affirmatively
determines that the director has no material relationship with
Wachovia (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or
officer of an organization that has a relationship with
Wachovia). The NYSE rules require a board to consider all of the
relevant facts and circumstances in determining the materiality
of a directors relationship with Wachovia and permit the
board to adopt and disclose standards to assist the board in
making determinations of independence. Accordingly, the board
has adopted Director Independence Standards to assist the board
in determining whether a director has a material relationship
with Wachovia. The Director Independence Standards should be
read together with the NYSE rules. The Director Independence
Standards are attached to this proxy statement as
Appendix A and are also available
13
on Wachovias website at www.wachovia.com
under the tab About WachoviaInvestor Relations
and then under the heading Corporate
GovernanceDirector Independence.
In February 2007, the board, with the assistance of the
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, conducted
an evaluation of director independence, based on the Director
Independence Standards, the NYSE rules and applicable SEC rules
and regulations. In connection with this review, the board
evaluated banking, commercial, charitable, consulting, familial
or other relationships with each director or immediate family
member and their related interests and Wachovia and its
subsidiaries, including those relationships described below
under Other Matters Relating to Executive Officers and
Directors and Related Party Transactions Policy.
As a result of this evaluation, the board affirmatively
determined that each of Mr. Baker, Mr. Brown,
Mr. Browning, Mr. Casteen, Mr. Gitt,
Mr. Goodwin, Ms. Herringer, Mr. Ingram,
Mr. James, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Neubauer,
Mr. Proctor, Mr. Richey, Dr. Shaw,
Mr. Smith, Mr. Whitaker, and Ms. Young is an
independent director under the Director Independence Standards,
the NYSE rules and the applicable SEC rules and regulations.
Each member of the Audit, Management Resources &
Compensation and Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committees is independent. Lloyd U. Noland, III and James S.
Balloun were independent directors prior to their retirements as
directors in April 2006.
In connection with its independence evaluation, the board
considered the following relationships and transactions, as
described by category or type in the Director Independence
Standards:
Customer
Relationships
Wachovia provides in the ordinary course of business lending
and/or other financial services to all of its directors, some of
their immediate family members and their affiliated
organizations, including to former directors who retired as
directors in 2006.
Supplier
or Other Business Relationships
Some entities affiliated with some of our directors or their
immediate family members may provide services to or do business
with Wachovia in the ordinary course of business, including the
following entities:
|
|
|
|
|
ARAMARK Holdings Corporation, where Mr. Neubauer is the
chief executive officer and beneficially owns approximately 9.7%
of the voting securities, is a service management company, and
in 2006, ARAMARK provided food and vending services to Wachovia;
|
|
|
|
The Riverstone Group, LLC, where Mr. Goodwin is the chief
executive officer and which is owned by members of
Mr. Goodwins immediate family, is an owner and
operator of, among other things, resort and hospitality
properties, and in 2006, the Riverstone Group, LLC provided
certain hotel, restaurant and meeting services to Wachovia;
|
|
|
|
The Greenwood Group, Inc., where Mr. Smith is a director
and beneficially owns approximately 30% of the voting interests,
is a Manpower staffing services franchisee, and in 2006, The
Greenwood Group provided contract-staffing services to Wachovia;
|
|
|
|
Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP, where a relative of
Mr. James is a partner, is a large law firm, and in 2006,
Bradley Arant provided legal services to Wachovia. The relative,
however, was not directly involved in providing legal services
to Wachovia other than de minimis services involving an
amount less than $1,000; and
|
|
|
|
Duke Energy, the University of Virginia, and the Phoenix
Companies, where Dr. Shaw, Mr. Casteen, and
Ms. Young, respectively, are employed provide services or
may otherwise do business with Wachovia. Duke Energy is one of
the largest electric power companies in the United States and it
provides utility services to Wachovia, the University of
Virginia is one of several educational institutions that
participates in sports marketing sponsorship arrangements with
Wachovia, and Wachovia offers some of the Phoenix
Companies products to its customers.
|
14
Family
Relationships
A relative of Mr. Proctor is employed as a customer
relations manager at Wachovia, but is not an executive officer
or officer required to file reports with the SEC under
Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act, and a relative of
Mr. Whitaker was employed as an investment advisor at
Wachovia, but not an executive officer or Section 16(a)
reporting officer, before retiring from Wachovia in March 2006.
Charitable
and Other Relationships
Mr. Casteen is employed at an organization that received
contributions from Wachovia that did not exceed the thresholds
described in the Director Independence Standards. In addition,
some Wachovia directors or their immediate family members are
non-management directors or trustees, but not officers or
significant equity owners, of entities that may be customers of
Wachovia or otherwise do business in the ordinary course with,
or may have received charitable contributions from, Wachovia.
Under the Director Independence Standards, these relationships
are not deemed to be material and are not considered by the
board in determining independence.
The board determined pursuant to the Director Independence
Standards and the NYSE rules that each of the above
relationships was not material. In particular, in connection
with considering the supplier or other business relationships
described above, the amounts involved or paid by Wachovia to
each of the above entities did not approach the 2% of
consolidated gross revenues threshold contained in the Director
Independence Standards and the NYSE rules, and in each case the
amounts involved were less than 0.5% of the consolidated gross
revenues of the entity, except for payments to Bradley Arant,
which were less than 1% of the law firms consolidated
gross revenues. The board determined pursuant to the Director
Independence Standards that these relationships were not
material to Wachovia or the other entity and that none of the
above directors or, to the extent applicable, their immediate
family members had a direct or indirect material interest in the
relationships or transactions with these entities.
The board also determined that Mr. Thompson and
Mr. Rady are not independent because of their Wachovia
employment.
Lead
Independent Director
The board has long recognized the importance of independent
leadership on the board, as evidenced by its designation of a
lead independent director in 2000. As provided in the Corporate
Governance Guidelines, the independent directors elect the lead
independent director, and in February 2007, the independent
directors elected Mr. Smith to continue in his role as the
boards lead independent director. The duties and
responsibilities of the lead independent director include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
assisting the Chairman of the Board with board-related matters,
including approving board meeting agendas, board meeting
schedules and various information sent to the board;
|
|
|
|
serving as the principal liaison between the independent
directors and the Chairman of the Board;
|
|
|
|
presiding at any meetings of the non-employee directors or
independent directors or at any meetings of the board at which
the Chairman of the Board is not present; and
|
|
|
|
any other duties or responsibilities that may be requested by
the independent directors or the Chairman of the Board,
including, as the lead independent director deems appropriate,
calling any meetings of the non-employee directors or
independent directors or meeting with any of Wachovias
executive officers, stockholders or other constituents.
|
Executive
Sessions
The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the
non-management directors will meet in regularly scheduled
executive sessions (no management or directors who are also
members of management present) at least three times each year.
The lead independent director, Mr. Smith, presides at the
regularly scheduled
15
executive sessions of the non-management directors. Four of
these executive sessions were held in 2006, including at least
one session where only the independent directors were present.
The Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that the board
will meet in executive sessions with the Chief Executive Officer
at least two times each year to discuss strategic or other key
issues regarding Wachovia, and may contact the Chief Executive
Officer at any other time to discuss Wachovias business.
Director
Nomination Process
The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee is
responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become
board members and for recommending to the board the individuals
for nomination as members of the board. In furtherance of the
boards Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee and the board expect
to create a board that will demonstrate objectivity and the
highest degree of integrity on an individual and collective
basis. In evaluating current members and new candidates, the
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee considers
the needs of the board and Wachovia in light of the current mix
of director skills and attributes. In addition to requiring that
each director possess unquestionable integrity and character,
the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committees
evaluation of director candidates includes an assessment of
issues and factors regarding an individuals education,
business experience, accounting and financial expertise, age,
diversity, reputation, civic and community relationships, and
knowledge and experience in matters impacting financial
institutions such as Wachovia. The Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee also takes into
consideration the boards policies outlined in its
Corporate Governance Guidelines, including those relating to the
boards retirement policy, the ability of directors to
devote adequate time to board and committee matters, and the
boards belief that a substantial majority of the board
should consist of independent directors. When the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee is considering
current board members for nomination for reelection, the
Committee also considers prior board and committee contributions
and performance, as well as meeting attendance records.
The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee may
seek the input of the other members of the board and management
in identifying and attracting director candidates that are
consistent with the criteria outlined above. In addition, the
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee may use the
services of consultants or a search firm, although it has not
done so in the past. Each of Mr. Gitt and
Ms. Herringer, who are standing for election by Wachovia
stockholders for the first time at the meeting, are former
directors of Golden West Financial Corporation who were
recommended by Golden West and appointed to the board following
the Golden West merger. Mr. Proctor, who also is standing
for election by Wachovia stockholders for the first time at the
meeting, was identified and recommended by the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee.
The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee will
consider recommendations by Wachovia stockholders of qualified
director candidates for possible nomination by the board.
Stockholders may recommend qualified director candidates by
writing to Wachovias Corporate Secretary, at our offices
at 301 South College Street, Charlotte, North Carolina
28288-0013.
Submissions should include information regarding a
candidates background, qualifications, experience, and
willingness to serve as a director. Based on a preliminary
assessment of a candidates qualifications, the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee may conduct
interviews with the candidate and request additional information
from the candidate. The Corporate Governance &
Nominating Committee uses the same process for evaluating all
nominees, including those recommended by stockholders.
In addition, Wachovias bylaws contain specific conditions
under which persons may be nominated directly by stockholders
for election as directors at an annual meeting of stockholders.
The provisions include the condition that stockholders comply
with the advance notice time frame requirements described below
under Other Stockholder Matters.
Communications
with Directors
The board has established a process for stockholders and other
interested parties to communicate directly with the lead
independent director or with the non-management directors
individually or as a group. Any
16
stockholder or other interested party who desires to contact one
or more of Wachovias non-management directors, including
the boards lead independent director, may send a letter to
the following address:
Board of Directors (or lead independent director or name of
individual director)
c/o Corporate Secretary
Wachovia Corporation
301 South College Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
28288-0013
All such communications will be forwarded to the lead
independent director or the appropriate director or directors
specified in such communications as soon as practicable.
In addition, as provided on Wachovias website at
www.wachovia.com under the tab About
Wachovia Investor Relations and then under the
heading Corporate GovernanceContact Wachovias
Directors, any stockholder or interested party who has any
concerns or complaints relating to accounting, internal
accounting controls or auditing matters, may contact the Audit
Committee by writing to the following address:
Wachovia Audit Committee
c/o Corporate Secretary
Wachovia Corporation
301 South College Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
28288-0013
Annual
Meeting Policy
Directors are expected to attend Wachovias annual meeting
of stockholders. In furtherance of this policy, Wachovias
board usually holds one of its regularly scheduled board
meetings on the same day as the annual stockholders
meeting. In 2006, all but one member of the board attended the
annual meeting of stockholders.
Code
of Conduct & Ethics
Wachovia has had a written code of conduct for many years. The
code, which applies to Wachovias directors and employees,
including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer, includes guidelines relating
to the ethical handling of actual or potential conflicts of
interest, compliance with laws, accurate financial reporting,
and procedures for promoting compliance with, and reporting
violations of, the code. The Code of Conduct & Ethics
is available on Wachovias website at
www.wachovia.com under the tab About
WachoviaInvestor Relations and then under the
heading Corporate GovernanceCode of
Conduct & Ethics, and is available in print to
any stockholder who requests it by contacting us at: Investor
Relations, Wachovia Corporation, 301 South College Street,
Charlotte, North Carolina
28288-0206,
or by telephone at
(704) 374-6782.
Wachovia intends to post any amendments to or waivers of its
Code of Conduct & Ethics (to the extent applicable to
Wachovias Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
or Principal Accounting Officer) at this location on our website.
Stock
Ownership Requirements
Our board has adopted a common stock ownership policy for
members of the board and our executive officers. This policy
requires our executive officers to own shares of common stock
having a value equal to five times base salary in the case of
our CEO and Chairman, and four times base salary for all other
executive officers. In addition, all of these executives are
required to retain ownership of at least 75% of any common stock
acquired by them through our stock compensation plans, after
taxes and transaction costs. Each of our directors must own
common stock or common stock equivalents having a value equal to
at least five times the annual cash retainer, which is currently
$70,000. In 2005, Wachovia expanded our stock ownership policy
to the level of management that reports directly to our
executive officers, who must own shares of common stock having a
value equal to two times base salary, and have three years to
meet this requirement. These ownership levels will be calculated
annually and executive officers and directors
17
have three years to meet the minimum level. Our board believes
this stock ownership policy substantially enhances stockholder
value by materially aligning managements interest with
those of stockholders. See also Security Ownership of
Management.
Compensation
of Directors
The Compensation Committee is responsible for studying the
compensation of directors and recommending changes for
consideration by the full board when appropriate. The
Compensation Committee annually reviews market data provided by
professionals in our Human Resources Division, outside
independent compensation consultants engaged by the Compensation
Committee, and legal counsel. Based on this analysis, no changes
to director compensation occurred in 2006.
Non-employee directors receive a quarterly cash retainer and
quarterly credits under Wachovias Deferred Compensation
Plan for Non-Employee Directors, which is described below, in
each directors common stock equivalent deferred account.
In addition, the lead independent director and the Chair of each
committee receive a quarterly fee.
The following table summarizes Wachovias director
compensation amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
Compensation
Element
|
|
Compensation($)
|
|
|
Annual Cash Retainer
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Annual Mandatory Stock Unit
Contribution
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Total Annual Compensation
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
Annual Committee Chair Fee
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Annual Audit Committee Chair Fee
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Annual Lead Independent Director
Fee
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Special Board Meeting Fee *
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Special Committee Meeting Fee *
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
If more than six board or committee meetings are held in an
annual period, directors receive an additional $1,500 for each
additional committee meeting attended and $2,000 for each
additional board meeting attended. |
Wachovia reimburses directors for travel and accommodation
expenses. Directors who are Wachovia employees do not receive
any directors fees.
Director
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth with respect to each person who
served as a director of Wachovia in 2006: (i) their name
(column (a)); (ii) the aggregate dollar amount of all fees
earned or paid in cash for services as a director, including
annual retainer fees, committee
and/or
chairmanship fees, and meeting fees (column (b)); (iii) for
awards of stock, the dollar amount recognized for financial
statement reporting purposes with respect to the fiscal year in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123R (SFAS 123R) (column (c));
(iv) the sum of (A) the aggregate change in the
actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under all
defined benefit and actuarial pension plans from the pension
plan measurement date used for financial statement reporting
purposes with respect to Wachovias audited financial
statements for the prior completed fiscal year to the pension
plan measurement date used for financial statement reporting
purposes with respect to Wachovias audited financial
statements for the covered fiscal year, and
(B) above-market or preferential earnings on compensation
that is deferred on a basis that is not tax-qualified, including
such earnings on nonqualified defined contribution plans (column
(d)); (v) all other compensation for the covered fiscal
year that Wachovia could not properly report in columns (b)-(d)
(column (e)); and (vi) the dollar value of total
compensation for the covered fiscal year (column (f)),
representing the sum of all amounts reported in columns (b)-(e).
18
2006
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or Paid
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
in Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Name
|
|
($) (6)
|
|
|
($) (7)
|
|
|
($) (8)
|
|
|
($) (9)
|
|
|
in 2006
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
Baker II, John
|
|
|
82,500
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
232,500
|
|
Balloun, James (1)
|
|
|
26,962
|
|
|
|
44,918
|
|
|
|
35,527
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
107,406
|
|
Brown, Robert
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
18,672
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
248,672
|
|
Browning, Peter
|
|
|
83,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
233,000
|
|
Casteen III, John
|
|
|
88,500
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
242,500
|
|
Gitt, Jerry (3)
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Goodwin Jr., William
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
239,000
|
|
Herringer, Maryellen (3)
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Ingram, Robert
|
|
|
93,750
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
243,750
|
|
James, Donald
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
2,683
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
234,683
|
|
Malone, Wallace (5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
McDonald, Mackey
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
4,794
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
239,794
|
|
Neubauer, Joseph
|
|
|
122,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
6,877
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
279,794
|
|
Noland III, Lloyd (2)
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
63,500
|
|
Proctor, Timothy (4)
|
|
|
11,603
|
|
|
|
24,864
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
36,468
|
|
Rady, Ernest (5) (10)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Richey, Van
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
232,000
|
|
Shaw, Ruth
|
|
|
98,500
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
248,500
|
|
Smith, Lanty
|
|
|
137,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
287,000
|
|
Thompson, G. Kennedy (5)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Whitaker Jr., John
|
|
|
83,500
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
237,500
|
|
Young, Dona
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
251,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,399,315
|
|
|
|
2,282,282
|
|
|
|
68,552
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
3,767,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Balloun retired as a director on April 18, 2006.
Reported compensation reflects amounts earned or accrued for
fiscal year 2006 through his retirement date. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Noland retired as a director on April 18, 2006.
Reported compensation reflects amounts earned or accrued for
fiscal year 2006 through his retirement date. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Gitt and Ms. Herringer were appointed to the board
of directors on October 1, 2006. Reported compensation
reflects amounts earned or accrued from October 1, 2006
through year end. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Proctor was appointed to the board of directors on
November 1, 2006. Reported compensation reflects amounts
earned or accrued from November 1, 2006 through year end. |
|
(5) |
|
Wachovia employees do not receive compensation for their role as
directors. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
All or a portion of the reported cash compensation may be
deferred through the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, which is discussed below. See table on the preceding
page for elements of director compensation. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Amounts reflect the annual mandatory deferred common stock unit
contribution provided to non-employee directors. Awards are made
in the form of fully vested common stock unit equivalents and
have been reported at the SFAS 123R value. These phantom
stock units are hypothetical shares with the underlying value
tied to the market price of Wachovia common stock. See
Wachovia Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors below for additional information. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Amounts reflect only that interest earned on deferred
compensation amounts that are considered to be above-market.
Interest paid on deferred compensation is deemed to be
above-market if it exceeds 120% of the applicable federal
long-term rate. |
19
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Amounts reflect Wachovia matching contribution component of the
Board of Directors Matching Gift Program. Under this program,
Wachovia will match, on a $2 for $1 basis, a directors
contributions to accredited educational institutions or other
nonprofit institutions in accordance with section 501(c) of
the Internal Revenue Code. Wachovias contribution is
limited to $4,000 in any given year. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
As a Wachovia employee, Mr. Rady does not receive
compensation as a director of Wachovia. However, Wachovia and
Mr. Rady signed an offer letter at the time Wachovia and
Westcorp entered into their merger agreement that became
effective upon completion of the Westcorp merger regarding
Mr. Radys role with Wachovia. Pursuant to that
letter, in 2006 Mr. Rady received a base salary of $500,000
and incentive compensation of $275,000. Mr. Rady is also
eligible to participate in Wachovias employee benefit
plans, including stock incentive plans. The letter also provides
that if Mr. Radys employment is terminated without
cause prior to January 1, 2008, he will receive
post-termination payments based on his salary and minimum
incentive compensation of $275,000. In March 2007, Mr. Rady
retired as an employee of Wachovia and, pursuant to the letter,
he will receive $691,667 in post-termination payments in 2007,
equal to the remainder of base salary for 2007 plus the minimum
incentive compensation. As described in Proposal 1,
Mr. Rady has been nominated for election as a Wachovia
director at the meeting. |
Wachovia
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors
Under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors,
directors who are not Wachovia employees may defer payment of
all or any part of their directors fees. Non-employee
directors make these deferral elections prior to each year or
upon appointment to the board. In conjunction with this deferral
election, non-employee directors also elect whether deferred
balances will earn interest set at the prime rate plus 2%
compounding quarterly or invested in deferred stock units with
the value tied to the market value of Wachovia common stock. The
$150,000 annual deferred stock unit component of the
directors retainer is provided through quarterly
contributions of $37,500 to the stock unit component of the
plan. These contributions must be invested in deferred stock
units during the year of contribution.
Directors having their fees in deferred stock units are
investing in common stock equivalents that are valued based on
the market value of Wachovia common stock. This means that the
value of their deferred account is based on the market value of
Wachovia common stock and will rise and fall as if the account
were actually invested in the stock. Common stock equivalents do
not have voting rights. Deferred stock units do not receive
dividends when declared on shares of Wachovia common stock but
do receive dividend equivalents that are re-invested into
additional deferred stock units. Deferred amounts are payable in
cash after the end of the calendar year in which the director
ceases to be a director, in annual installments over a ten-year
period, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation
Committee.
20
The following table sets forth with respect to each person who
served as a director of Wachovia in 2006: (i) their name
(column (a)); (ii) the aggregate interest-bearing balance
in the directors Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors account at December 31, 2006 (column
(b)); (iii) the aggregate number of deferred stock units in
the directors Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors account at December 31, 2006 (column (c));
(iv) the aggregate dollar value of the deferred stock units
in the directors Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors account at December 31, 2006 (column
(d)); and (v) the aggregate value of the directors
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors account at
December 31, 2006 (the sum of columns (b) and (d))
(column (e)).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Deferred Stock
|
|
|
Deferred Stock
|
|
|
Total Deferred
|
|
|
|
Bearing
Balance
|
|
|
Units Held
|
|
|
Units Held
|
|
|
Balances
|
|
|
|
at
12/31/2006
|
|
|
at
12/31/2006
|
|
|
at
12/31/2006
|
|
|
at
12/31/2006
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(#) (1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
Baker II, John
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
21,767
|
|
|
|
1,239,603
|
|
|
|
1,239,603
|
|
Balloun, James
|
|
|
852,930
|
|
|
|
15,728
|
|
|
|
895,719
|
|
|
|
1,748,649
|
|
Brown, Robert
|
|
|
333,440
|
|
|
|
20,680
|
|
|
|
1,177,751
|
|
|
|
1,511,191
|
|
Browning, Peter
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
22,970
|
|
|
|
1,308,121
|
|
|
|
1,308,121
|
|
Casteen III, John
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
22,435
|
|
|
|
1,277,697
|
|
|
|
1,277,697
|
|
Gitt, Jerry
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
38,663
|
|
|
|
38,663
|
|
Goodwin Jr., William
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
53,434
|
|
|
|
3,043,072
|
|
|
|
3,043,072
|
|
Herringer, Maryellen
|
|
|
17,943
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
38,663
|
|
|
|
56,606
|
|
Ingram, Robert
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
35,513
|
|
|
|
2,022,449
|
|
|
|
2,022,449
|
|
James, Donald
|
|
|
87,088
|
|
|
|
7,445
|
|
|
|
424,003
|
|
|
|
511,091
|
|
Malone, Wallace
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
McDonald, Mackey
|
|
|
123,952
|
|
|
|
40,173
|
|
|
|
2,287,860
|
|
|
|
2,411,812
|
|
Neubauer, Joseph
|
|
|
177,808
|
|
|
|
40,921
|
|
|
|
2,330,469
|
|
|
|
2,508,277
|
|
Noland III, Lloyd
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
26,333
|
|
|
|
1,499,645
|
|
|
|
1,499,645
|
|
Proctor, Timothy
|
|
|
11,799
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
25,947
|
|
|
|
37,746
|
|
Rady, Ernest
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Richey, Van
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,970
|
|
|
|
510,816
|
|
|
|
510,816
|
|
Shaw, Ruth
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
39,813
|
|
|
|
2,267,363
|
|
|
|
2,267,363
|
|
Smith, Lanty
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
93,260
|
|
|
|
5,311,146
|
|
|
|
5,311,146
|
|
Thompson, G. Kennedy
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Whitaker Jr., John
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
39,114
|
|
|
|
2,227,558
|
|
|
|
2,227,558
|
|
Young, Dona
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
26,231
|
|
|
|
1,493,831
|
|
|
|
1,493,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,604,960
|
|
|
|
516,601
|
|
|
|
29,420,376
|
|
|
|
31,025,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rounded to the nearest whole share, based on Wachovias
common stock price on December 29, 2006. |
In conjunction with the First UnionWachovia merger,
Wachovia terminated and froze accrued benefits under the legacy
First Union Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors program.
Accrued benefits at the time the plan was frozen have been
rolled into the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors at the net present value for all currently active
directors with the exception of Mr. Brown. As a former
participant in that retirement plan, upon his retirement as a
director, Mr. Brown will be eligible to receive an annual
payment of $86,991 for a period of three years.
Audit
Committee Report
As detailed in its charter, the role of the Audit Committee is
to assist the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities
regarding the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the integrity of Wachovias financial statements, including
matters relating to its internal controls;
|
|
|
|
the qualification and independence of Wachovias
independent auditors;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
the performance of Wachovias internal auditors and the
independent auditors; and
|
|
|
|
Wachovias compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements.
|
Management is responsible for the preparation and presentation
of Wachovias financial statements and its overall
financial reporting process and, with the assistance of
Wachovias internal auditors, for maintaining appropriate
internal controls and procedures that provide for compliance
with accounting standards and applicable laws. The independent
auditors are responsible for planning and carrying out a proper
audit of Wachovias financial statements, expressing an
opinion as to their conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles and annually auditing managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Members of the Audit Committee are not
professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting
and are not full-time employees of Wachovia.
In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit
Committee, among other things, reviewed and discussed the
audited financial statements with management and the independent
auditors. Management has represented, and the independent
auditors have confirmed, to the Audit Committee that the
financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee has also
discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to
be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
Communications with Audit Committees, as currently in
effect. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the
written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors
required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1,
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, as
currently in effect, has considered whether the provision of
non-audit services by the independent auditors to Wachovia is
compatible with maintaining the auditors independence, and
has discussed with the auditors the auditors independence.
Based upon the review and discussions described in this report,
and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities
of the Audit Committee referred to above and in the Audit
Committees charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the
board that the audited financial statements be included in
Wachovias Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, to be filed with the
SEC.
Joseph Neubauer,
Chair
John D. Baker, II
John T. Casteen, III
Jerry Gitt
Lanty L. Smith
22
Security
Ownership of Management
The following table shows the number of shares of common stock
and common stock equivalents beneficially owned as of
February 12, 2007, by each nominee for director, each
incumbent director, the executive officers named in the summary
compensation table, and all directors and executive officers as
a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the named
individuals and each member of the group has sole voting power
and sole investment power with respect to the shares shown. The
number of shares beneficially owned, as that term is defined by
Rule 13d-3
under the 1934 Act, by all directors, nominees and executive
officers as a group totals approximately 2.9% of the outstanding
common stock as of February 12, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Name of
Individual
|
|
Common
Stock (2)
|
|
|
John D. Baker, II (1)
|
|
|
54,720
|
|
Robert J. Brown (4)
|
|
|
23,419
|
|
Peter C. Browning (1)
|
|
|
27,840
|
|
David M. Carroll (3)
|
|
|
964,215
|
|
John T. Casteen, III
|
|
|
29,725
|
|
Stephen E.
Cummings (1) (3)
|
|
|
478,424
|
|
Jean E. Davis (3)
|
|
|
786,656
|
|
Jerry Gitt
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
William H. Goodwin, Jr.
|
|
|
1,110,402
|
|
Maryellen C. Herringer (1)
|
|
|
17,850
|
|
Robert A. Ingram
|
|
|
40,946
|
|
Donald M. James (3)
|
|
|
29,043
|
|
Benjamin P.
Jenkins, III (1) (3)
|
|
|
1,572,243
|
|
Robert P. Kelly (1) (3)
|
|
|
34,847
|
|
Wallace D.
Malone, Jr. (1) (3)
|
|
|
7,575,008
|
|
Mackey J. McDonald
|
|
|
43,571
|
|
Joseph Neubauer
|
|
|
50,353
|
|
Timothy D. Proctor
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
Ernest S. Rady (3) (5)
|
|
|
35,858,649
|
|
Van L. Richey (3)
|
|
|
28,617
|
|
Ruth G. Shaw (1)
|
|
|
42,173
|
|
Lanty L. Smith
|
|
|
127,430
|
|
G. Kennedy
Thompson (1) (3)
|
|
|
3,762,178
|
|
John C. Whitaker, Jr.
|
|
|
52,623
|
|
Thomas J. Wurtz (3) (5)
|
|
|
253,338
|
|
Dona Davis Young (1)
|
|
|
34,138
|
|
All directors, nominees, Named
Officers and executive officers as a group (31 persons)
|
|
|
55,153,722
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The foregoing directors, nominees and named executive officers
have sole voting and investment power over the shares of common
stock beneficially owned by them on February 12, 2007,
except for the following shares over which the directors,
nominees and named executive officers share voting
and/or
investment power: Mr. Baker: 11,630 shares;
Mr. Browning: 3,500 shares; Mr. Cummings:
2,400 shares; Ms. Herringer: 3,900 shares;
Mr. Jenkins: 37,200 shares; Mr. Kelly:
11,573 shares; Mr. Malone: 1,098,653 shares;
Dr. Shaw: 700 shares; Mr. Thompson:
42,726 shares; and Ms. Young: 6,873 shares. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts reported include the number of units of common stock
equivalents held by directors, as of February 12, 2007,
under deferred compensation arrangements, rounded down to the
nearest whole share, as follows: Mr. Baker:
22,761 units; Mr. Brown: 21,432 units;
Mr. Browning: 23,937 units; Mr. Casteen:
23,346 units; Mr. Gitt: 1,338 units;
Mr. Goodwin: 54,402 units; Ms. Herringer:
1,338 units; Mr. Ingram: 36,546 units;
Mr. James: 8,413 units; Mr. McDonald:
41,141 units; Mr. Neubauer: 42,025 units;
Mr. Proctor: 1,423 units; Mr. Richey:
9,937 units; Dr. Shaw: 40,473 units;
Mr. Smith: 94,430 units; Mr. Whitaker:
40,082 units; Ms. Young: 27,264 units; and all
directors as a group: 490,288 units. These units will be
paid in cash, based on the fair market value of the common stock
at |
23
|
|
|
|
|
the time of payment, which would generally occur following
retirement as a director. There are no voting rights with
respect to these units. In addition, the following directors own
shares of Wachovia Dividend Equalization Preferred shares as of
February 12, 2007, which securities do not have voting
rights at the meeting: Mr. Rady: 4,400 shares; and
Ms. Young: 2,000 shares. See Corporate
Governance Policies and PracticesCompensation of
Directors. |
|
(3) |
|
Included in the shares set forth above are the following shares
held under certain of Wachovias employee benefit plans,
including options exercisable on February 12, 2007, or
within 60 days thereafter, by each of the following named
executive officers and by all of the directors and all of our
executive officers as a group: Mr. Carroll:
785,219 shares; Mr. Cummings: 305,267 shares;
Ms. Davis: 657,824 shares; Mr. James:
2,670 shares; Mr. Jenkins: 1,338,654 shares;
Mr. Kelly: 3,062 shares; Mr. Malone:
4,677,883 shares; Mr. Rady: 138,320 shares;
Mr. Richey: 2,670 shares; Mr. Thompson:
3,062,127 shares; Mr. Wurtz: 182,404 shares; and
members of the group (including the foregoing):
12,786,331 shares. Non-employee directors are not eligible
to participate in any of Wachovias stock option or other
employee benefit plans. Messrs. James and Richey were
granted options pursuant to SouthTrust Corporation stock option
plans, which Wachovia assumed in that merger. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Brown is retiring as a director as of the meeting but
was a director as of the record date for the meeting. |
|
(5) |
|
Of the shares owned by Mr. Rady and certain entities that
he controls, 11,328,301 of such shares have been pledged as
security in lending transactions in the ordinary course of
business for those entities. Of the shares owned by
Mr. Wurtz, 27,941 of such shares are subject to pledge in a
securities brokerage account. |
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
We are not aware of any stockholder who was the beneficial owner
of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock on the
record date, except for Barclays Global Investors, NA and
affiliated entities, 45 Fremont Street, San Francisco,
California 94104, bank and investment advisors that, based on a
Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, were the holders of
106,626,899 shares of common stock as of December 31,
2006, or approximately 5.6% of the outstanding shares of common
stock as of such date. The Barclays entities indicated that they
hold such shares for accounts under Barclays discretionary
management and not for their own account. The Barclays entities
also indicated that they have sole voting power with respect to
93,326,113 of such shares and sole dispositive power over all of
them.
Executive
Compensation
The following information relates to compensation paid or
payable to (i) the current Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO),
(ii) the three other most highly compensated executive
officers that were serving as such at December 31, 2006,
(iii) one former executive officer who served as CFO during
a portion of 2006, and (iv) two former executive officers
who were not serving as executive officers at December 31,
2006 but whose total compensation in 2006 would have been among
the three most highly compensated executive officers (the
current CEO and CFO and those six other executive officers, the
Named Officers).
24
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth for the Named Officers:
(i) their name and principal positions (column (a));
(ii) year covered (column (b)); (iii) the dollar value
of base salary (cash and non-cash) earned during the year
covered (column (c)); (iv) for awards of stock, the dollar
amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes
with respect to the fiscal year in accordance with
SFAS 123R (column (d)); (v) for awards of stock
options, the dollar amount recognized for financial reporting
purposes with respect to the fiscal year in accordance with
SFAS 123R (column (e)); (vi) the dollar value of all
earnings for services performed during the fiscal year pursuant
to awards under non-equity incentive plans and all earnings on
outstanding awards (column (f)); (vii) the sum of
(A) the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of
the accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and actuarial
pension plans from the pension plan measurement date used for
financial statement reporting purposes with respect to
Wachovias audited financial statements for the prior
completed fiscal year to the pension plan measurement date used
for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to
Wachovias audited financial statements for the covered
fiscal year, and (B) above-market or preferential earnings
on compensation that is deferred on a basis that is not
tax-qualified, including such earnings on nonqualified defined
contribution plans (column (g)); (viii) all other
compensation for the covered fiscal year that is not properly
reported in any other column (column (h)); and (ix) the
dollar value of total compensation for the covered fiscal year
(column (i)), representing the sum of the amounts reported in
columns (c)-(h).
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($) (1)
|
|
|
($) (2)
|
|
|
($) (2)
|
|
|
($) (1) (3)
|
|
|
($) (4)
|
|
|
($) (5)
|
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
G. Kennedy Thompson
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
1,090,000
|
|
|
|
9,064,002
|
|
|
|
8,144,728
|
|
|
|
5,150,000
|
|
|
|
181,374
|
|
|
|
216,178
|
|
|
|
23,846,282
|
|
President, CEO and Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Wurtz
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
420,833
|
|
|
|
527,162
|
|
|
|
328,606
|
|
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
|
|
62,159
|
|
|
|
37,755
|
|
|
|
3,126,515
|
|
Senior Executive
Vice President and CFO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin P. Jenkins, III
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
3,090,032
|
|
|
|
2,798,600
|
|
|
|
3,450,000
|
|
|
|
410,453
|
|
|
|
145,120
|
|
|
|
10,594,205
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen E. Cummings
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
2,232,105
|
|
|
|
1,969,274
|
|
|
|
3,875,000
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
91,689
|
|
|
|
8,689,070
|
|
Senior Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David M. Carroll
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
642,000
|
|
|
|
1,370,566
|
|
|
|
1,257,909
|
|
|
|
2,850,000
|
|
|
|
56,726
|
|
|
|
60,638
|
|
|
|
6,237,839
|
|
Senior Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wallace D. Malone, Jr. (6)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
83,333
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,994,443
|
(9)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,194,102
|
|
|
|
14,374,812
|
|
|
|
23,646,690
|
|
Retired Vice Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert P. Kelly (7)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
56,061
|
|
|
|
0
|
(10)
|
|
|
0
|
(10)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
7,548
|
|
|
|
64,001
|
|
Former Senior Executive
Vice President and CFO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean E. Davis (8)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
2,075,667
|
(11)
|
|
|
1,846,276
|
(11)
|
|
|
661,918
|
|
|
|
1,126,752
|
|
|
|
1,380,776
|
|
|
|
7,296,389
|
|
Retired Senior Executive
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts include compensation earned but deferred by the Named
Officers under Wachovias deferred compensation plans.
Participants in these plans may defer receipt of portions of the
salary
and/or
annual incentive compensation they have earned into investment
accounts. See also Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Table. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts reflect Wachovias expense recognized in 2006 for
outstanding stock awards calculated in accordance with
SFAS 123R. |
25
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides additional detail on
SFAS 123R stock award expense recognition in 2006,
including the 2006 stock awards and prior years stock
awards. The SFAS 123R grant date fair value for 2006 awards
is provided for reference and is also reported in Grants
of Plan-Based Awards Table. See also Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Stock
|
|
|
Prior Year Stock
|
|
|
Total Stock
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Award Expense
|
|
|
Award Expense
|
|
|
Award Expense
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
of 2006
|
|
|
|
in 2006 ($)(a)
|
|
|
in 2006 ($)(b)
|
|
|
in 2006 ($)
|
|
|
Stock Awards ($)(c)
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
5,520,757
|
|
|
|
2,623,971
|
|
|
|
8,144,728
|
|
|
|
5,520,757
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
6,285,447
|
|
|
|
2,778,555
|
|
|
|
9,064,002
|
|
|
|
6,285,447
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,806,204
|
|
|
|
5,402,526
|
|
|
|
17,208,730
|
|
|
|
11,806,204
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
146,399
|
|
|
|
182,207
|
|
|
|
328,606
|
|
|
|
975,994
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
166,679
|
|
|
|
360,483
|
|
|
|
527,162
|
|
|
|
1,111,191
|
|
Total
|
|
|
313,078
|
|
|
|
542,690
|
|
|
|
855,768
|
|
|
|
2,087,185
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
1,813,970
|
|
|
|
984,630
|
|
|
|
2,798,600
|
|
|
|
1,813,970
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
2,065,218
|
|
|
|
1,024,814
|
|
|
|
3,090,032
|
|
|
|
2,065,218
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,879,188
|
|
|
|
2,009,444
|
|
|
|
5,888,632
|
|
|
|
3,879,188
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
1,478,780
|
|
|
|
490,494
|
|
|
|
1,969,274
|
|
|
|
1,478,780
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
1,683,630
|
|
|
|
548,475
|
|
|
|
2,232,105
|
|
|
|
1,683,630
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,162,410
|
|
|
|
1,038,969
|
|
|
|
4,201,379
|
|
|
|
3,162,410
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
650,663
|
|
|
|
607,246
|
|
|
|
1,257,909
|
|
|
|
1,084,438
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
740,802
|
|
|
|
629,764
|
|
|
|
1,370,566
|
|
|
|
1,234,669
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,391,465
|
|
|
|
1,237,010
|
|
|
|
2,628,475
|
|
|
|
2,319,107
|
|
Malone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,994,443
|
|
|
|
4,994,443
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,994,443
|
|
|
|
4,994,443
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Kelly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Davis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,846,276
|
|
|
|
1,846,276
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,075,667
|
|
|
|
2,075,667
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,921,943
|
|
|
|
3,921,943
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
With the implementation of SFAS 123R in 2006, Wachovia
recognizes expense associated with 2006 stock awards over the
period from the date of grant to the date at which an employee
becomes retirement-eligible under Wachovias qualified
pension plan. Messrs. Thompson, Jenkins and Cummings were
eligible for retirement in 2006 and reported amounts include the
full SFAS 123R expense for stock awards granted in 2006
rather than prorated over the
5-year
vesting term. Mr. Carroll is retirement-eligible in 2007
and the reported amounts include an accelerated 1.25 year
expense recognition period for his 2006 stock awards rather than
the 5-year
vesting term. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
With the implementation of SFAS 123R in 2006, Wachovia
continues to recognize expense associated with stock grants in
prior years over the vesting term of those awards. Amounts
reflect the expense recognized in 2006 for stock awards granted
in years prior to 2006. |
|
(c) |
|
Amounts reflect the full grant date value of 2006 stock awards
calculated in accordance with SFAS 123R and provide a
perspective on the aggregate cost of stock awards made in 2006
to the Named Officers. As noted in (a) above, these amounts
will be recognized over the lesser of (i) the vesting term
of the awards (five years for the 2006 awards) or (ii) the
period at which the Named Officer becomes retirement-eligible
under Wachovias qualified pension plan. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Amounts reflect payment of performance-based annual cash
incentive awards for fiscal year 2006 performance. Wachovia
provides performance-based annual cash incentive awards to
executive officers under the covered officer incentive component
of the stockholder approved Amended and Restated |
26
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Stock Incentive Plan (the SIP). See additional
discussion in Compensation Discussion &
Analysis and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Amounts reflect the benefits attributable to the Named Officers
for 2006 compensation and services (i) as calculated under
Wachovias pension plan and non-qualified retirement
benefit plans and (ii) above-market return on deferred
compensation earned by the Named Officers during 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
Malone
|
|
|
Kelly
|
|
|
Davis
|
|
|
Accrued Retirement Plan Benefit
($)(a)
|
|
|
51,859
|
|
|
|
47,128
|
|
|
|
64,555
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
25,051
|
|
|
|
3,359,854
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
1,126,752
|
|
Above Market Earnings on Deferred
Compensation ($)(b)
|
|
|
129,515
|
|
|
|
15,031
|
|
|
|
345,898
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
31,675
|
|
|
|
834,248
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
181,374
|
|
|
|
62,159
|
|
|
|
410,453
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
56,726
|
|
|
|
4,194,102
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
1,126,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts reflect the benefits attributable to the Named Officers
for 2006 compensation and services as calculated under
Wachovias pension plan and non-qualified retirement
benefit plans for the Named Officers during 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
As noted under Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-Control, in accordance with her employment
agreement, Ms. Davis is receiving compensation continuance
through May 31, 2009, including continued service credit in
her legacy Wachovia supplemental executive retirement agreement
(SERA). The reported amount includes accrued
benefits under our qualified pension plan and her SERA
attributed to 2006. Additional discussion of the benefit to
Ms. Davis under the SERA for future years is provided in
Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-Control. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Amounts reflect only interest earned on deferred compensation
amounts that is considered to be above-market. Interest paid on
deferred compensation is deemed to be above-market if it exceeds
120% of the applicable federal long-term rate. |
|
|
|
All Wachovia employee deferred compensation plans that provide
for above-market earnings were frozen prior to 2006 and are no
longer open for additional executive or employer contributions.
For additional information on deferred compensation programs,
see Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Represents personal benefits as outlined in the table below,
valued at the incremental cost to Wachovia of providing such
benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
Malone
|
|
|
Kelly
|
|
|
Davis
|
|
|
Value of life insurance
premiums ($)(a)
|
|
|
56,850
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
63,421
|
|
|
|
36,587
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
64,125
|
|
Amounts paid for financial planning
and tax preparation services ($)(b)
|
|
|
20,911
|
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
|
|
12,800
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
8,520
|
|
|
|
9,375
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Amounts paid for personal use of
corporate aircraft ($)(c)
|
|
|
39,426
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Amounts paid for taxes on behalf of
the executive ($)(d)
|
|
|
9,080
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Savings Plan matching
contribution ($)(e)
|
|
|
65,400
|
|
|
|
25,250
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
38,520
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
3,364
|
|
|
|
11,310
|
|
Amounts provided for supplemental
life insurance benefits ($)(f)
|
|
|
23,603
|
|
|
|
6,605
|
|
|
|
22,118
|
|
|
|
10,102
|
|
|
|
12,906
|
|
|
|
163,929
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
6,609
|
|
Value of disability
insurance ($)(g)
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Termination-related
payments ($)(h)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
14,200,258
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,283,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
216,178
|
|
|
|
37,755
|
|
|
|
145,120
|
|
|
|
91,689
|
|
|
|
60,638
|
|
|
|
14,374,812
|
|
|
|
7,548
|
|
|
|
1,380,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2003, Wachovia terminated split-dollar life insurance
agreements with its executive officers. Following such
terminations, Wachovia received our interest in the related life
insurance policies under those agreements. These amounts reflect
payments made by Wachovia in 2006 to compensate
Messrs. Thompson and Cummings and Ms. Davis for the
cost of obtaining and maintaining personal supplemental life
insurance benefits in lieu of those split-dollar life insurance
arrangements. |
|
|
|
In lieu of continuing his personal supplemental life insurance
benefits as replacement for his terminated split-dollar life
insurance arrangement, Mr. Jenkins received a one-time
payment of $63,421 in 2006 as reimbursement for the value of the
split-dollar policy cash surrender value for the policy
cancelled in 2003. |
|
(b) |
|
Amounts reflect the cost of financial planning, including
financial planning and tax counseling for executives. All
services were provided by an outside vendor and reflect actual
expenses incurred in 2006. |
|
(c) |
|
The value of personal use of corporate aircraft reflects the
calculated incremental cost to Wachovia of personal use of
company aircraft. Incremental costs have been calculated based
on the variable operating costs to Wachovia. Variable costs
consist of trip-specific costs, including fuel, catering,
mileage, maintenance, universal weather-monitoring, landing/ramp
fees and other miscellaneous variable costs. Incremental cost
calculations do not include fixed costs. |
|
|
|
Corporate aircraft are used primarily for business travel. On
certain occasions, an executives spouse or other family
member may accompany the executive on a flight. Calculations
exclude spouse or other family member when such travel is
necessary for business purposes. |
|
(d) |
|
The board of directors has required Wachovias chief
executive officer to use company aircraft for all travel
whenever practicable for security reasons and provides for tax
gross-up
payments to offset the tax impact of imputing this expense as
income to him. In 2006, Mr. Thompson was reimbursed $9,080
for taxes associated with personal use of company aircraft. No
other executives are required to use company aircraft for all
travel and accordingly, do not receive tax
gross-ups
for their personal use of company aircraft. |
|
(e) |
|
Amounts reflect Wachovia matching contributions made pursuant to
the Wachovia Savings Plan and the Wachovia Savings Restoration
Plan in 2006. Wachovia matching contributions are dollar for
dollar up to 6% of base salary. See also Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Table. |
|
(f) |
|
Amounts reflect the cost of supplemental term life insurance
incurred in 2006 for the Named Officers. |
|
(g) |
|
Amounts reflect the cost of supplemental disability insurance
incurred in 2006 for the Named Officers. |
28
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Amounts reflect termination-related payments paid in 2006.
Mr. Malone and Ms. Davis are entitled to receive
termination-related payments in future years and such payments
are described under Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-Control. Termination-related payments in 2006
were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malone
|
|
|
Davis
|
|
|
Employment agreement payments
($)(i)
|
|
|
6,113,794
|
|
|
|
1,237,553
|
|
Excise tax payments ($)(ii)
|
|
|
7,449,603
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Office space ($)(iii)
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Automobile transfer ($)(iv)
|
|
|
78,400
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Medical, life and dental insurance
($)(v)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
43,208
|
|
Accrued vacation payments ($)(vi)
|
|
|
238,462
|
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
14,200,258
|
|
|
|
1,283,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Amounts reflect termination-related payments in accordance with
the respective employment agreements. |
|
(ii) |
|
Amounts reflect reimbursement of excise tax payments associated
with his termination in 2006 following the change-in-control of
SouthTrust in 2004. Payments in 2006 finalize all excise tax
gross-up
requirements provided for in his employment agreement. |
|
(iii) |
|
Reflects reimbursement for ongoing office space, including tax
gross-up, in accordance with his employment agreement. |
|
(iv) |
|
Reflects the transfer of a Wachovia-owned automobile he used and
related costs, including tax
gross-up, in
accordance with his employment agreement. |
|
(v) |
|
Reflects company cost associated with medical, life and dental
insurance provided during her three-year compensation
continuance period, in accordance with her employment agreement. |
|
(vi) |
|
Reflects payment for accrued vacation as of the date of
termination. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Retired effective January 31, 2006. |
|
(7) |
|
Served as Chief Financial Officer through February 4, 2006. |
|
(8) |
|
Retired effective May 31, 2006. |
|
(9) |
|
In connection with his retirement and in accordance with
SFAS 123R, his 2005 stock option award fully vested. Amount
reflects the SFAS 123R expense recognized in 2006
associated with this award. See footnote (2) above. |
|
(10) |
|
In connection with his termination, unvested stock options and
unvested shares of restricted stock were forfeited. For
financial reporting purposes, Wachovia reversed $521,655 in
previously recognized stock option expense and $971,173 in
previously recognized restricted stock expense in 2006
associated with these forfeited stock awards. |
|
(11) |
|
In connection with her termination and in accordance with
SFAS 123R, amounts reflect the SFAS 123R expense
recognized in 2006 associated with unvested stock awards. |
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table sets forth for the Named Officers:
(i) their name (column (a)); (ii) the grant date for
equity-based awards reported in the table (column (b)(i)), and
the date on which the compensation committee took actions to
grant such awards (column (b)(ii)); (iii) the dollar value
of the estimated possible payout upon satisfaction of the
conditions in question under non-equity incentive plan awards
granted in the fiscal year, denominated in threshold, target and
maximum amount (columns (c)-(e)); (iv) the number of shares
of stock granted in the fiscal year (column (f)); (v) the
number of securities underlying options granted in the fiscal
year (column (g)); (vi) the per-share exercise or base
price of the options granted in the fiscal year (column (h));
and (vii) the grant date fair value of each equity award
computed in accordance with SFAS 123R (column (i)).
29
GRANTS OF
PLAN-BASED AWARDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Possible Annual
|
|
|
Stock Awards:
|
|
|
Option Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payouts Under
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
Awards (2)
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Base Price
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Action
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
of Option
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
|
Date
(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
or Units
(#)
|
|
|
Options
(#)
|
|
|
Awards
($/Sh)
|
|
|
Equity Awards
($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)(i)
|
|
|
(b)(ii)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,641
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
12,351,369
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,641
|
(4)
|
|
|
58.36
|
|
|
|
1,925,933
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,140
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
6,285,447
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
548,238
|
(7)
|
|
|
56.05
|
|
|
|
5,520,757
|
(10)
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
1,600,000
|
|
|
|
3,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,747
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1,852,755
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,747
|
(4)
|
|
|
58.36
|
|
|
|
288,898
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,825
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1,111,191
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,921
|
(7)
|
|
|
56.05
|
|
|
|
975,994
|
(10)
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
2,800,000
|
|
|
|
5,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,260
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
3,458,414
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,260
|
(4)
|
|
|
58.36
|
|
|
|
539,266
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,846
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,065,218
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,136
|
(7)
|
|
|
56.05
|
|
|
|
1,813,970
|
(10)
|
Cummings
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875,000
|
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,972
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,799,649
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,972
|
(4)
|
|
|
58.36
|
|
|
|
436,545
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,038
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1,683,630
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,850
|
(7)
|
|
|
56.05
|
|
|
|
1,478,780
|
(10)
|
Carroll
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375,000
|
|
|
|
2,750,000
|
|
|
|
5,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,274
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,058,591
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
02/20/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,274
|
(4)
|
|
|
58.36
|
|
|
|
320,898
|
(9)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,028
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1,234,669
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
03/31/06
|
|
|
|
02/21/06
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,690
|
(7)
|
|
|
56.05
|
|
|
|
1,084,438
|
(10)
|
Malone
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Davis
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
1,300,000
|
|
|
|
2,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See also Compensation Discussion & Analysis.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2006, Wachovia began transitioning from an April annual stock
grant date to a February annual stock grant date to coincide
with the Compensation Committees annual incentive review
process. The transition to a February annual stock grant date
was accomplished in February 2007 with a February 20, 2007
stock grant date. |
|
|
|
Pursuant to SEC regulations, this table includes grants of stock
awards made to Named Officers in the last completed fiscal year.
Stockholders should note that the stock awards dated
March 31, 2006 were based on performance in fiscal year
2005. Although not required by SEC regulations, in order to more
accurately inform stockholders of compensation for the Named
Officers for 2006, information presented in the table includes
stock awards granted in February 2007 to the Named Officers that
was based on performance in fiscal year 2006. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Wachovia provides performance-based annual cash incentive awards
to our executive officers under the covered officer incentive
component of the SIP. For 2006, funding for the SIP has been
based on an assessment of Wachovias actual financial
performance relative to the Compensation Committees
pre-established performance goals. The maximum individual
incentive award in a given year under the SIP, including the
annual cash incentive award and the grant date value of
restricted stock, is limited to 0.5% of Wachovias adjusted
net income. Actual awards for 2006 performance are set forth in
column (f) of Summary Compensation Table. See also
Compensation Discussion & Analysis. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Shares of restricted stock granted February 20, 2007 are
contingent upon Wachovia achieving a 20% return on tangible
common equity for 2007. If Wachovia attains this goal, the
restricted shares will vest at a rate of 20% per year over
five years from the February 20, 2007 grant date. In the
event of termination due to death, retirement (as defined in the
SIP), or a change in control of Wachovia, any
remaining vesting restrictions will lapse. |
|
|
|
Dividends are paid on shares of restricted stock at the same
time as dividends on our other outstanding shares of common
stock are paid and have been included in the value of restricted
shares reported in accordance with SFAS 123R. |
30
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Stock options granted February 20, 2007 have an exercise
price equal to the February 20, 2007 grant date closing
price and will vest at a rate of 20% per year over five
years. These options have a term of 10 years. In the event
of termination due to death, retirement (as defined in the SIP),
or a change in control of Wachovia, any remaining
vesting restrictions will lapse. |
|
(5) |
|
In 2006, the Compensation Committee determined to transition
Wachovias annual stock grant from April to February. At
the time the Compensation Committee took action with respect to
2006 stock awards for all participants, including the Named
Officers, on February 21, 2006, it made such stock award
grants effective on March 31, 2006 in order to ensure that
all grant and measurement date requirements, including
communication of awards, were attained prior to grant in
accordance with SFAS 123R. The exercise price of these 2006
stock options was the closing price of Wachovia common stock on
March 31, 2006. |
|
(6) |
|
Shares of restricted stock granted March 31, 2006 were
contingent upon Wachovia achieving a 20% return on tangible
common equity for 2006. Wachovia met this goal and the
restricted shares will vest at a rate of 20% per year over
five years from the March 31, 2006 grant date. In the event
of termination due to death, retirement (as defined in the SIP),
or a change in control of Wachovia, any remaining
vesting restrictions will lapse. |
|
|
|
Dividends are paid on shares of restricted stock at the same
time as dividends on our other outstanding shares of common
stock are paid and have been included in the value of restricted
shares reported in accordance with SFAS 123R. |
|
(7) |
|
Stock options granted March 31, 2006 have an exercise price
equal to the March 31, 2006 grant date closing price and
will vest at a rate of 20% per year over five years. These
options have a term of 10 years. In the event of
termination due to death, retirement (as defined in the SIP), or
a change in control of Wachovia, any remaining
vesting restrictions will lapse. |
|
(8) |
|
The values shown for the shares of restricted stock reflect the
SFAS 123R value over the
5-year
vesting period for the shares. Dividends are paid on shares of
restricted stock at the same time as dividends on our other
outstanding shares of common stock and are included in the
SFAS 123R valuation as reported. |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
The values shown for the options granted February 20, 2007
reflect the SFAS 123R expense associated with these options
based upon application of the Black-Scholes pricing model,
estimating the fair value of stock options using the following
assumptions: (i) risk-free interest rates of 4.67%;
(ii) dividend yield of 3.84%; (iii) volatility of
Wachovia common stock of 17.14%; and (iv) weighted average
expected lives of the stock options of 7.0 years. Wachovia
calculated its volatility estimate from implied volatility of
actively traded options on Wachovia common stock with remaining
maturities of two years. The values do not take into account
risk factors such as non-transferability and limits on
exercisability. In assessing the values indicated in the above
table, it should be kept in mind that regardless of what
theoretical value is placed on a stock option on the date of
grant, the ultimate value of the option is dependent on the
market value of the common stock at a future date, which will
depend to a large degree on the efforts of the Named Officers to
bring future success to Wachovia for the benefit of all
stockholders. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
The values shown for the options granted March 31, 2006
reflect the SFAS 123R expense associated with these options
based upon application of the Black-Scholes pricing model,
estimating the fair value of stock options using the following
assumptions: (i) risk-free interest rates of 4.83%;
(ii) dividend yield of 3.64%; (iii) volatility of
Wachovia common stock of 18.87%; and (iv) weighted average
expected lives of the stock options of 7.0 years. Wachovia
calculated its volatility estimate from implied volatility of
actively traded options on Wachovia common stock with remaining
maturities of two years. The values do not take into account
risk factors such as non-transferability and limits on
exercisability. In assessing the values indicated in the above
table, it should be kept in mind that regardless of what
theoretical value is placed on a stock option on the date of
grant, the ultimate value of the option is dependent on the
market value of the common stock at a future date, which will
depend to a large degree on the efforts of the Named Officers to
bring future success to Wachovia for the benefit of all
stockholders. |
31
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table
The following table sets forth for the Named Officers:
(i) their name (column (a)); (ii) on an
award-by-award
basis, the number of securities underlying unexercised options,
including awards that have been transferred other than for
value, that are exercisable (column (b)); (iii) on an
award-by-award
basis, the number of securities underlying unexercised options,
including awards that have been transferred other than for
value, that are unexercisable (column (c)); (iv) for each
instrument reported in columns (b) and (c), as applicable, the
exercise or base price (column (d)); (v) for each
instrument reported in columns (b) and (c), as applicable, the
expiration date (column (e)); (vi) the total number of
shares of stock that have not vested (column (f)); and
(vii) the aggregate market value of shares of stock that
have not vested as of December 31, 2006 (column (g)).
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or Units
|
|
|
Shares or Units
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
of Stock That
|
|
|
of Stock That
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
|
Vested ($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,096
|
(1)
|
|
|
17,318,267
|
|
|
|
|
37,200
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
40.1300
|
|
|
|
04/15/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,294
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
62.1250
|
|
|
|
04/21/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54.9375
|
|
|
|
04/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,900
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
31.5625
|
|
|
|
01/03/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
27.5625
|
|
|
|
10/17/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
31.0625
|
|
|
|
01/04/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
30.4000
|
|
|
|
04/17/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,800
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34.9200
|
|
|
|
07/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678,120
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37.9800
|
|
|
|
04/16/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,234
|
|
|
|
237,490
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.4300
|
|
|
|
04/22/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,619
|
|
|
|
251,429
|
(3)
|
|
|
44.6500
|
|
|
|
04/19/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,772
|
|
|
|
335,092
|
(4)
|
|
|
50.3800
|
|
|
|
04/18/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
548,238
|
(5)
|
|
|
56.0500
|
|
|
|
03/31/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,270
|
(1)
|
|
|
1,723,877
|
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
40.1300
|
|
|
|
04/15/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
62.1250
|
|
|
|
04/21/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54.9375
|
|
|
|
04/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
40.1300
|
|
|
|
04/15/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,641
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
62.1250
|
|
|
|
04/21/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,580
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54.9375
|
|
|
|
04/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34.9375
|
|
|
|
12/14/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34.9200
|
|
|
|
07/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,167
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37.9800
|
|
|
|
04/16/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,509
|
|
|
|
13,673
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.4300
|
|
|
|
04/22/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,536
|
|
|
|
20,306
|
(3)
|
|
|
44.6500
|
|
|
|
04/19/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,104
|
|
|
|
24,418
|
(4)
|
|
|
50.3800
|
|
|
|
04/18/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
96,921
|
(5)
|
|
|
56.0500
|
|
|
|
03/31/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,062
|
(1)
|
|
|
6,097,181
|
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54.9375
|
|
|
|
04/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,982
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
62.1250
|
|
|
|
04/21/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,969
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54.9375
|
|
|
|
04/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34.9375
|
|
|
|
12/14/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
31.5625
|
|
|
|
01/03/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
27.5625
|
|
|
|
10/17/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
30.4000
|
|
|
|
04/17/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,300
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34.9200
|
|
|
|
07/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,342
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37.9800
|
|
|
|
04/16/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,494
|
|
|
|
94,996
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.4300
|
|
|
|
04/22/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,857
|
|
|
|
94,286
|
(3)
|
|
|
44.6500
|
|
|
|
04/19/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,998
|
|
|
|
115,994
|
(4)
|
|
|
50.3800
|
|
|
|
04/18/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
180,136
|
(5)
|
|
|
56.0500
|
|
|
|
03/31/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or Units
|
|
|
Shares or Units
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
of Stock That
|
|
|
of Stock That
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
|
Vested ($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,339
|
(1)
|
|
|
3,948,856
|
|
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54.9375
|
|
|
|
04/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,680
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54.9375
|
|
|
|
04/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
30.4000
|
|
|
|
04/17/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,765
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37.9800
|
|
|
|
04/16/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,435
|
|
|
|
35,624
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.4300
|
|
|
|
04/22/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,444
|
|
|
|
36,668
|
(3)
|
|
|
44.6500
|
|
|
|
04/19/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,554
|
|
|
|
90,217
|
(4)
|
|
|
50.3800
|
|
|
|
04/18/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
146,850
|
(5)
|
|
|
56.0500
|
|
|
|
03/31/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,124
|
(1)
|
|
|
3,708,812
|
|
|
|
|
2,492
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
40.1300
|
|
|
|
04/15/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
62.1250
|
|
|
|
04/21/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54.9375
|
|
|
|
04/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,708
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
40.1300
|
|
|
|
04/15/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,373
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
62.1250
|
|
|
|
04/21/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,780
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
54.9375
|
|
|
|
04/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,450
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34.9375
|
|
|
|
12/14/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,050
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
31.5625
|
|
|
|
01/03/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
27.5625
|
|
|
|
10/17/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
30.4000
|
|
|
|
04/17/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,300
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34.9200
|
|
|
|
07/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,671
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37.9800
|
|
|
|
04/16/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,058
|
|
|
|
59,373
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.4300
|
|
|
|
04/22/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,412
|
|
|
|
57,620
|
(3)
|
|
|
44.6500
|
|
|
|
04/19/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,721
|
|
|
|
70,885
|
(4)
|
|
|
50.3800
|
|
|
|
04/18/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
107,690
|
(5)
|
|
|
56.0500
|
|
|
|
03/31/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691,496
|
(8)
|
|
|
39,380,697
|
|
|
|
|
155,307
|
(7)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13.6200
|
|
|
|
01/16/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13.6300
|
|
|
|
01/15/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,082
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20.3200
|
|
|
|
01/27/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533,998
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
21.9100
|
|
|
|
02/05/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
801,002
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
24.7200
|
|
|
|
04/15/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,794
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
21.2400
|
|
|
|
01/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
21.2500
|
|
|
|
01/19/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640,800
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20.6000
|
|
|
|
10/20/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,826
|
(7)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
17.6300
|
|
|
|
01/18/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,057
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
22.5100
|
|
|
|
01/15/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
26.9900
|
|
|
|
01/15/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,499
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
29.4200
|
|
|
|
01/13/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37.7000
|
|
|
|
01/20/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585,824
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
50.3800
|
|
|
|
04/18/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Davis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,563
|
(1)
|
|
|
2,367,013
|
|
|
|
|
47,670
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
42.9100
|
|
|
|
01/22/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
44.5900
|
|
|
|
04/23/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,876
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
32.0000
|
|
|
|
08/29/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25.5900
|
|
|
|
08/29/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
33.6900
|
|
|
|
08/29/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,607
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37.9800
|
|
|
|
04/16/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,496
|
|
|
|
56,998
|
(2)
|
|
|
37.4300
|
|
|
|
04/22/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,952
|
|
|
|
31,429
|
(3)
|
|
|
44.6500
|
|
|
|
04/19/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,502
|
|
|
|
21,754
|
(6)
|
|
|
45.0200
|
|
|
|
06/21/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,721
|
|
|
|
70,885
|
(4)
|
|
|
50.3800
|
|
|
|
04/18/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table reflects outstanding stock awards as of
December 31, 2006. As noted in Grants of Plan-Based
Awards Table, additional stock awards were granted on
February 20, 2007. These stock awards are not reflected in
the table above.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares of restricted stock will vest at a rate of 20% per
year on the anniversary date of the grant. Information presented
aggregates all historical grants of restricted stock awards.
Dividends are paid on |
33
|
|
|
|
|
shares of restricted stock at the same time as dividends on our
other outstanding shares of common stock are paid. |
|
(2) |
|
Non-qualified stock options vest at a rate of 20% per year
with remaining vesting dates of
4/22/2007
and
4/22/2008.
For Ms. Davis, options will continue to vest on the normal
vesting schedule during her compensation continuance period. |
|
(3) |
|
Non-qualified stock options vest at a rate of 20% per year
with remaining vesting dates of
4/19/2007,
4/19/2008
and
4/19/2009.
For Ms. Davis, options will continue to vest on the normal
vesting schedule during her compensation continuance period. |
|
(4) |
|
Non-qualified stock options vest at a rate of 20% per year
with remaining vesting dates of
4/18/2007,
4/18/2008,
4/18/2009
and
4/18/2010.
For Ms. Davis, options will continue to vest on the normal
vesting schedule during her compensation continuance period and
will fully vest on May 31, 2009 when the compensation
continuance period ends. |
|
(5) |
|
Non-qualified stock options vest at a rate of 20% per year
with remaining vesting dates of
3/31/2007,
3/31/2008,
3/31/2009,
3/31/2010
and
3/31/2011. |
|
(6) |
|
Non-qualified stock options vest at a rate of 20% per year
with remaining vesting dates of
6/21/2007,
6/21/2008
and
6/21/2009.
For Ms. Davis, options will continue to vest on the normal
vesting schedule during her compensation continuance period and
will fully vest on May 31, 2009 when the compensation
continuance period ends. |
|
(7) |
|
These vested stock options have been gifted to family members. |
|
(8) |
|
In 1998, SouthTrust entered into the Wallace D. Malone, Jr.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan and Agreement, and
amounts represent restricted stock units granted under that
agreement. Upon payout on January 15, 2007, these
restricted stock units were converted into shares of Wachovia
common stock pursuant to the terms of such agreement, and had a
market value of approximately $39.4 million at the time of
payout. |
34
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The following table sets forth for the Named Officers with
respect to fiscal year 2006: (i) their name (column (a));
(ii) the number of securities for which the options were
exercised (column (b)); (iii) the aggregate dollar value
realized upon exercise of options, or upon the transfer of an
award for value (column (c)): (iv) the number of shares of
stock that have vested (column (d)); and (v) the aggregate
dollar value realized upon vesting of stock, or upon the
transfer of an award for value (column (e)).
OPTION
EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Shares Acquired
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
Name
|
|
(#) (1)
|
|
|
($) (2)
|
|
|
(#) (3)
|
|
|
($) (4)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
30,800
|
|
|
|
833,140
|
|
|
|
62,042
|
|
|
|
3,496,580
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
31,500
|
|
|
|
768,206
|
|
|
|
18,346
|
|
|
|
1,044,173
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
25,200
|
|
|
|
409,336
|
|
|
|
23,032
|
|
|
|
1,298,283
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
11,909
|
|
|
|
670,694
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
18,450
|
|
|
|
475,088
|
|
|
|
14,169
|
|
|
|
798,714
|
|
Malone (5)
|
|
|
37,647
|
|
|
|
1,483,401
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Kelly
|
|
|
623,279
|
|
|
|
12,449,730
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Davis
|
|
|
57,454
|
|
|
|
1,189,424
|
|
|
|
13,603
|
|
|
|
760,457
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Share amounts represent the total number of stock options
exercised and have not been adjusted to reflect shares sold to
cover the exercise cost of the aggregate stock options exercised
or the payment of applicable taxes. |
|
(2) |
|
Values represent the difference between the stock option
exercise price and the market value of Wachovia common stock on
the date of exercise, rounded to the nearest dollar. |
|
(3) |
|
Share amounts are represented on a pre-tax basis. Our SIP
permits withholding a number of shares upon vesting to pay
applicable income taxes. |
|
(4) |
|
Values represent the market value of Wachovia common stock on
the vesting date, rounded to the nearest dollar. |
|
(5) |
|
Amounts do not include the 2006 exercise of 267,331
non-qualified stock options that were gifted to family members
in previous years. Upon exercise of these options, $11,737,196
in value was realized. |
35
Pension
Benefits Table
The following table sets forth for the Named Officers:
(i) their name (column (a)); (ii) the name of the plan
(column (b)); (iii) the number of years of service credited
under the plan, computed as of the same pension plan measurement
date used for financial statement reporting purposes with
respect to Wachovias audited financial statements for the
last completed fiscal year (column (c)); (iv) the actuarial
present value of the accumulated benefit under the plan,
computed as of the same pension plan measurement date used for
financial statement reporting purposes with respect to
Wachovias audited financial statements for the last
completed fiscal year (column (d)); and (v) the dollar
amount of any payments and benefits paid during Wachovias
last completed fiscal year (column (e)).
PENSION
BENEFITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Present Value
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Credited
|
|
|
of Accumulated
|
|
|
During Last
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Plan
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
($) (1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
Wachovia Pension Plan and Trust
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
812,295
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
Wachovia Pension Plan and Trust
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
163,545
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Union Benefit Restoration Plan
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
133,171
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
Wachovia Pension Plan and Trust
|
|
|
34.1667
|
|
|
|
1,269,410
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cummings
|
|
Wachovia Pension Plan and Trust
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
147,782
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carroll
|
|
Wachovia Pension Plan and Trust
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
447,885
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malone
|
|
Wachovia Pension Plan and Trust
|
|
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,903,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Retirement Plan
|
|
|
46.5833
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,793,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Incentive Retirement
Benefit Plan
|
|
|
46.5833
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
17,325,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Retirement Benefit Plan
|
|
|
46.5833
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
648,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Deferred Benefit Plan
|
|
|
46.5833
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,582,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Management Retirement Plan
|
|
|
46.5833
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,212,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly
|
|
Wachovia Pension Plan and Trust
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
82,955
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Davis
|
|
Wachovia Pension Plan and Trust
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
512,883
|
|
|
|
512,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Executive Retirement
Agreement
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
7,658,969
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The present value of accumulated benefits has been calculated
using the same assumptions, as set forth below, except
assumptions used to calculate the present value of Mr.
Malones and Ms. Davis accumulated benefits have been
based on actual facts and circumstances in accordance with their
lump-sum distributions in 2006. The assumptions used are as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ms. Davis Wachovia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan and
|
|
|
|
|
Named Officers*
|
|
Trust
|
|
Mr. Malones Plans
|
|
Discount Rate
|
|
5.75%
|
|
4.46%
|
|
4.46%
|
Mortality Table (post-retirement)
|
|
2000RP
|
|
1994GAM
|
|
1994GAM
|
Retirement Age
|
|
62
|
|
50.9166
|
|
69.4167
|
Payment Form (% Lump Sum)
|
|
80% Lump Sum
|
|
100% Lump Sum
|
|
100% Lump Sum
|
|
|
20% Life Annuity
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-retirement Mortality,
Termination, Disability
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Excluding Mr. Malone and Ms. Daviss Wachovia Pension Plan
and Trust, each presented in columns to the right. Assumes
retirement age for: Mr. Cummings63;
Mr. Kelly65; and Ms. Davis60.
|
The present value of accumulated benefits have been calculated
as of September 30, 2006, which is the measurement date
used for financial statement reporting purposes. Ms. Davis
received a $512,883 lump sum full distribution under the
Wachovia pension plan in December 2006. Accordingly, there was
no accumulated benefits balance under the Wachovia pension plan
as of December 31, 2006 for Ms. Davis.
36
Wachovia
Pension Plan and Trust:
A qualified retirement benefit plan that provides an annual
benefit commencing at age 65 equal to the sum of
(i) 1.15% of final average monthly compensation up to
covered compensation, times years of benefit service (up to
35 years), (ii) 1.55% of final average monthly
compensation above covered compensation, times years of benefit
service (up to 35 years), and (iii) 0.5% of final average
monthly compensation times years of benefit service in excess of
35 years. For purposes of determining benefits under the
plan, final average monthly compensation is the
greater of the monthly average of benefits eligible
compensation during (i) any five (or fewer)
consecutive full calendar years of service in eligible
employment during the last 10 full calendar years of service in
eligible employment with Wachovia, or (ii) the final 60
consecutive full calendar months of service in eligible
employment with Wachovia, counting benefits eligible
compensation in any last partial month as compensation for the
preceding month. Benefits eligible compensation reflects base
salary before any reductions for contributions to the Wachovia
Savings Plan or before-tax contributions for health and welfare
benefits or transportation spending accounts.
Employees that are classified as a full-time or part-time
employee that have reached age 21 and have completed one
year of service are eligible to participate in the plan.
Participants become vested in plan benefits when they have
earned five years of service credit based on 1,000 hours of
service in a calendar year. Participants are eligible for Normal
Retirement on the first day of the month on or after the date
they have reached age 65 and have completed five years of
vesting service. Participants are eligible to elect early
retirement on the first day of any calendar month after reaching
age 50 and having completed 10 years of service. The
normal retirement benefit for a 20-year participant is not
reduced for retirement between ages 62 and 65.
Since 2000, before he became an executive officer,
Mr. Wurtz has participated in the First Union Corporation
Benefit Restoration Plan, a non-qualified retirement benefit
plan intended to restore benefits that are curtailed as a result
of legal limits that apply to the Wachovia Pension Plan and
Trust. The benefits under the plan represent the benefit
Mr. Wurtz would be entitled to under the Wachovia Pension
Plan and Trust, calculated without regard to the compensation
limit in effect under Internal Revenue Code
Section 401(a)(17) or the benefit limit in effect under
Section 415.
In addition to his participation in the Wachovia Pension Plan
and Trust following Wachovias acquisition of SouthTrust on
November 1, 2004, Mr. Malone participated in the
following SouthTrust defined benefit retirement plans, from
which all accumulated benefits were paid to him in a lump-sum in
2006 upon his retirement from Wachovia:
Additional Retirement Plan: Provides for benefits that
mirror those of the Wachovia Pension Plan on compensation
excluded by Internal Revenue Service regulations from inclusion
in the Pension Plan.
Performance Incentive Retirement Benefit Plan: Provides
retirement benefits on short-term incentive compensation. The
plan formula mirrors the formula in the Wachovia Pension Plan
and applies it to the short-term incentive compensation paid to
included executives.
Enhanced Retirement Benefit Plan: Provides retirement
benefits using the same formula as the Wachovia Pension Plan but
applying it to a three year average compensation figure for both
base salary and short-term incentive income rather than the five
year average used in both the Wachovia Pension Plan and the
Performance Incentive Retirement Plan.
Second Deferred Benefit Plan: SouthTrust adopted in 2000
a retirement plan that provides a deferred compensation benefit
equivalent to the present value of a 6% base salary increase
over a four year period, including the effect such salary
increase would have on his 401(k) and ESOP benefit, pension
benefit and short-term incentive payments from SouthTrust.
Executive Management Retirement Plan: Effective
January 1, 2002, provides a retirement benefit that
includes long-term incentive compensation in determining the
benefits.
In addition, Mr. Malone is currently receiving an annual
payment of $480,000 under the SouthTrust Corporation Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan. This plan was established to provide
an annual benefit in lieu of $30,000 in annual contributions to
a SouthTrust defined contribution plan that he elected to
37
forego in 1987. The plan provides for payments for the greater
of 15 years or his lifetime. Annual payments commenced in
1996.
Ms. Davis entered into her SERA with legacy Wachovia in
1999. Ms. Davis SERA is a non-qualified retirement
benefit plan that provides an annual benefit commencing at
age 60 equal to 2.5% of highest 3 year average total
cash compensation (base salary and incentive) prior to any
deferrals during the final five full years of service multiplied
by the number of years of service credit. The benefit has a
maximum benefit of 62.5% and is subject to an offset for any
qualified defined benefit payments. Under the terms of the SERA
and her employment agreement, Ms. Davis receives service
credit through May 31, 2009. In conjunction with the
Wachovia-First Union merger, which constituted a change of
control of legacy Wachovia as defined in the SERA,
Ms. Davis is fully vested in the benefits of the SERA which
may not be terminated, suspended or amended without her
agreement.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Table
The following table sets forth for the Named Officers:
(i) their name (column (a)); (ii) the dollar amount of
total account balances as of the beginning of Wachovias
last fiscal year (column (b)); (iii) the dollar amount of
aggregate executive contributions during Wachovias last
fiscal year (column (c)); (iv) the dollar amount of
aggregate Wachovia contributions during Wachovias last
fiscal year (column (d)); (v) the dollar amount of
aggregate interest or other earnings accrued during
Wachovias last fiscal year (column (e)); (vi) the
aggregate dollar amount of all withdrawals and distributions
during Wachovias last fiscal year (column (f)); and
(vii) the dollar amount of total account balances as of the
end of Wachovias last fiscal year (column (g)).
NONQUALIFIED
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Wachovia
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starting Balance
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
in 2006
|
|
|
Withdrawals/
|
|
|
Aggregate Balance
|
|
Name
|
|
at 1/1/2006 ($)(1)
|
|
|
in 2006 ($)
|
|
|
in 2006 ($)(2)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
|
Distributions ($)
|
|
|
at 12/31/2006 ($)(1)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
3,812,453
|
|
|
|
49,050
|
|
|
|
52,200
|
|
|
|
434,477
|
|
|
|
9,866
|
|
|
|
4,338,314
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
2,016,830
|
|
|
|
431,875
|
|
|
|
15,938
|
|
|
|
320,989
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,785,632
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
13,613,202
|
|
|
|
1,651,250
|
|
|
|
28,800
|
|
|
|
1,179,982
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16,473,234
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
126,884
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
16,800
|
|
|
|
25,221
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
183,905
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
1,800,582
|
|
|
|
37,450
|
|
|
|
25,320
|
|
|
|
167,946
|
|
|
|
170,267
|
|
|
|
1,861,031
|
|
Malone
|
|
|
21,283,547
|
|
|
|
3,212,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,355,850
|
|
|
|
3,113,863
|
|
|
|
23,738,034
|
|
Kelly
|
|
|
4,263,656
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
137,242
|
|
|
|
4,400,898
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Davis
|
|
|
408,797
|
|
|
|
7,380
|
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
24,091
|
|
|
|
308,948
|
|
|
|
135,010
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the aggregate balances in all Wachovia-sponsored
non-qualified defined contribution and other deferred
compensation plans, including (a) the Wachovia Savings
Restoration Plan, (b) the Wachovia deferred compensation
plans, and (c) in the case of Mr. Malone, deferred
compensation plans sponsored by SouthTrust that Wachovia assumed
in the WachoviaSouthTrust merger. See below for a
description of these plans. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents Wachovias contributions matching the Named
Officers personal contributions in the Wachovia Savings
Restoration Plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents earnings on plan balances in 2006. Earnings may
increase or decrease depending on the performance of the elected
investments. Above-market earnings are reflected in the
Summary Compensation Table, footnote (4); otherwise
earnings on these plans are not reflected in the Summary
Compensation Table. |
38
The following table sets forth information about (1) the
extent to which deferred compensation contributions and earnings
(columns (c), (d) and (e) above) are reported as
compensation in the Summary Compensation Table in
this proxy statement, and (2) the extent to which amounts
reported in the aggregate balance at December 31, 2006
(column (g) above) were previously reported as compensation
to the Named Officers in the Summary Compensation Table in prior
years proxy statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2006
Balance Reported in
|
|
|
12/31/2006
Balance Reported in
|
|
|
|
the Summary Compensation Table for 2006
|
|
|
Prior Year Summary Compensation Tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Excess of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
|
in Excess of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions ($) (a)
|
|
|
Market ($) (b)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Employee ($) (c)
|
|
|
Employer ($) (d)
|
|
|
Market ($) (e)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Thompson
|
|
|
101,250
|
|
|
|
129,515
|
|
|
|
230,765
|
|
|
|
900,325
|
|
|
|
323,600
|
|
|
|
322,917
|
|
|
|
1,546,842
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
447,813
|
|
|
|
15,031
|
|
|
|
462,844
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
1,680,050
|
|
|
|
345,898
|
|
|
|
2,025,948
|
|
|
|
5,531,200
|
|
|
|
147,520
|
|
|
|
582,528
|
|
|
|
6,261,248
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
31,800
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
46,700
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
91,700
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
62,770
|
|
|
|
31,675
|
|
|
|
94,445
|
|
|
|
365,565
|
|
|
|
65,280
|
|
|
|
67,283
|
|
|
|
498,128
|
|
Malone (f)
|
|
|
3,212,500
|
|
|
|
834,248
|
|
|
|
4,046,748
|
|
|
|
1,687,529
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
431,738
|
|
|
|
2,170,267
|
|
Kelly
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
3,306,833
|
|
|
|
99,600
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
3,407,084
|
|
Davis (g)
|
|
|
11,070
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
11,070
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Amounts reflect aggregate executive and Wachovia contributions
in 2006 to deferred compensation accounts that have been
reported in Summary Compensation Table. |
|
(b) |
|
Amounts reflect above-market interest on deferred compensation
earned in 2006 and that have been reported in Summary
Compensation Table. |
|
(c) |
|
Amounts reflect executive contributions to deferred compensation
accounts at the election of the Named Officer in years prior to
2006 and which were reported in Summary Compensation
Table in prior year proxy statements. |
|
(d) |
|
Amounts reflect Wachovia contributions to deferred compensation
accounts in years prior to 2006 and which were reported in
Summary Compensation Table in prior year proxy
statements. |
|
(e) |
|
Amounts reflect above-market interest on deferred compensation
earned in years prior to 2006 and which were reported in
Summary Compensation Table in prior year proxy
statements. |
|
(f) |
|
Amounts exclude deferred earnings in excess of market he earned
that were reported in SouthTrust proxy statement filings. |
|
(g) |
|
Amounts exclude deferred earnings in excess of market she earned
that were reported in legacy Wachovia proxy statement filings. |
Wachovia Corporation Savings Restoration Plan:
The Wachovia Corporation Savings Restoration Plan is an
unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provides
for pre-tax deferral contributions to restore 401(k) savings
plan contributions beyond the IRS qualified savings plan
contribution limitations. For 2006, employees with an annual
base salary greater than $210,000 as of August 31, 2005
were eligible to participate and could elect to contribute up to
30% of base salary. Wachovia matches participants
contributions on a dollar for dollar basis up to 6% of base
salary.
Participants direct deferred balances in eleven investment index
benchmarks which mirror those offered in Wachovias 401(k)
savings plan, with the exception of the Wachovia Common Stock
Fund. Participants may reallocate deferred balances among the
various investment indexes on a daily basis.
At the time participants elect to participate in the plan, they
chose whether to receive payments in a lump sum or annual
installments paid over ten years. Participants also chose when
payments will be made, either at separation or retirement
(whichever occurs earlier) or after a specified number of years
not to be less than five years.
Loans are not permitted under the plan. In the event an
unforeseeable emergency resulting from unusual or extraordinary
events which cause severe financial hardship, participants may
petition for a hardship
39
distribution subject to administrative committee approval in
accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A and
other regulatory constraints. In the event a participant ceases
to be employed by Wachovia, the deferral account balance will be
distributed in accordance with the elected method of
distribution.
Wachovia
Corporation Elective Deferral
Plan
The Elective Deferral Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified deferred
compensation plan that provides for voluntary deferral of base
salary
and/or
incentive, draw, and commission payments until a future
dategenerally retirement, death, or separation. For 2006,
employees with total cash compensation (base salary, incentive,
draw and commission) of $210,000 and greater paid between
January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004
and/or
September 1, 2004 through August 31, 2005 were
eligible to participate in the plan and could elect to defer 10%
to 75% of base salary earned from January 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006 and 10% to 90% of incentive, draw and
commission compensation earned in 2006.
Participants direct deferred balances in eleven investment index
benchmarks which mirror those offered in Wachovias 401(k)
savings plan, with the exception of the Wachovia Common Stock
Fund. Participants may reallocate deferred balances among the
various investment indexes on a daily basis.
At the time participants elect to participate in the plan, they
chose whether to receive payments in a lump sum or annual
installments paid over ten years. Participants also chose when
payments will be made, either at separation or retirement
(whichever occurs earlier) or after a specified number of years
not to be less than five years.
Loans are not permitted under the plan. In the event an
unforeseeable emergency resulting from unusual or extraordinary
events which cause severe financial hardship, participants may
petition for a hardship distribution subject to administrative
committee approval in accordance with Internal Revenue Code
Section 409A and other regulatory constraints. In the event
a participant ceases to be employed by Wachovia, the deferral
account balance will be distributed in accordance with the
elected method of distribution.
Wachovia
Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation
Plans I, II and
III
The Executive Deferred Compensation Plans I, II and
III are unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plans that
provided senior managers selected by Wachovias Chief
Executive Officer the ability to voluntarily defer base salary
and/or
incentive payments until a future dategenerally
retirement, death, or separation. Participation in this plan was
frozen and contributions ceased in February 2002.
Participant balances are credited with a rate equal to the
average of the Prime Rate over four quarters plus 2%. The
interest is credited on December 31 each year.
The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan I dictates that a
participants account balance be paid in approximately 10
equal installments. In the event that a participant voluntarily
terminates employment
and/or
becomes affiliated with a competitor, payment will be made in
the form of a lump sum. The Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan II allows participants to elect whether to receive
payments in a lump sum or annual installments paid over ten
years in approximately 10 equal installments. In the event that
a participant voluntarily terminates employment
and/or
becomes affiliated with a competitor, payment will be made in
the form of a lump sum. The Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan III dictates that a participants account balance
be paid in a lump sum.
Loans are not permitted under the plans. In the event an
unforeseeable emergency resulting from unusual or extraordinary
events which cause severe financial hardship, participants may
petition for a hardship distribution subject to administrative
committee approval.
The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan I allows a participant
to irrevocably elect to withdraw an amount from the plan
90 days prior to December 31 every five years. There
is a 6% penalty associated with this type of withdrawal.
40
SouthTrust
Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan
The SouthTrust Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded,
nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provided senior
officers of SouthTrust the ability to voluntarily defer base
salary
and/or
incentive payments. Wachovia assumed SouthTrusts
obligations under this plan following the
WachoviaSouthTrust merger in November 2004. Contributions
to this plan ceased in February 2005.
Participant balances are credited with a rate equal to the
average of the Prime Rate for the quarter, plus 2%. The interest
is credited on the last day of each quarter.
Participants may choose whether to receive payments in a lump
sum or in quarterly or annual installments not to exceed
15 years. Participants begin receiving payment upon
reaching the age designated for early or normal retirement or
upon separation of service (whichever occurs earlier).
SouthTrust
Corporation Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan
The SouthTrust Supplemental Retirement Benefit Plan is an
unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan that provided
senior officers of SouthTrust benefits that would have otherwise
been provided under the SouthTrust Corporation Profit Sharing
Plan if not for the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue
Code. Wachovia assumed SouthTrusts obligations under this
plan following the WachoviaSouthTrust merger in November
2004. Contributions to this plan ceased in December 2004.
Participants direct deferred balances in investment index
benchmarks which mirror those offered in Wachovias 401(k)
savings plan, with the exception of the Wachovia Common Stock
Fund. Participants may reallocate deferred balances among the
various investment indexes on a daily basis.
Participants are paid in a lump sum in the month following their
request for distribution in the Wachovia Savings Plan.
Legacy
Wachovia Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
Legacy Wachovia restated the Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan effective January 1, 2000 to include the legacy
Wachovia Retirement Savings & Profit Sharing Benefit
Equalization Plan (RSPSP Equalization Plan). The RSPSP
Equalization Plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan
that provided senior officers of legacy Wachovia benefits that
would have otherwise been provided under the legacy Wachovia
Retirement Savings & Profit Sharing Plan if not for the
limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions
to this plan ceased in December 2001.
Participant balances are credited with a rate equal to the AFR
Long Term Rate. The balance increases daily based on the rate
for the current month.
Participants with a balance greater than $25,000 will receive
monthly distributions for 10 years beginning the January
following the termination date. Participants with a balance less
than $25,000 will receive a lump sum distribution the January
following the termination date.
In the event of an unforeseeable emergency resulting from
unusual or extraordinary events which cause severe financial
hardship, the participant may petition for a hardship
distribution subject to administrative committee approval.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-Control
General
Assumptions
The presentation herein makes certain assumptions in order to
discuss various scenarios, as required by SEC regulation. For
these purposes, Wachovia has assumed that each executives
date of termination as a result of the indicated triggering
event or the occurrence of a change in control of Wachovia is
December 31, 2006 and the price per share of Wachovia
common stock on the date of termination is $56.95, which was the
closing price of Wachovia common stock on December 29, 2006
(the last business day of the fiscal year). Unless provided
otherwise, all payments would be made by Wachovia under the
41
applicable benefit plan, program or agreement. The discussion
herein summarizes benefits the Named Officers may be entitled to
receive under certain Wachovia plans
and/or
agreements. Stockholders are encouraged to refer to those
agreements which are filed or incorporated by reference in
Wachovias Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Mr. Thompson
In December 2005, at his request, Mr. Thompson and Wachovia
terminated his employment agreement. Therefore, any payments or
benefits to which he would be entitled upon his termination of
employment or a change in control of Wachovia would be governed
by other existing plans and programs maintained by Wachovia.
Stock
Award Acceleration
Mr. Thompson would be entitled to accelerated vesting of
all outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards under
the SIP in the event of his early retirement (he was early
retirement eligible as of December 31, 2006), involuntary
termination not for cause (whether or not in connection with a
change of control of Wachovia), death or disability or upon a
change in control of Wachovia. For these purposes, we have
assumed that the Compensation Committee consented to his early
retirement. As of December 31, 2006, 1,372,249 unvested
stock options and 304,096 unvested restricted stock awards
previously granted to him having a value of $10,423,350 and
$17,318,267, respectively, would vest fully in each of these
circumstances. A termination of employment for cause would not
result in accelerated vesting of such stock awards.
Severance
Benefits
Because Mr. Thompson does not have an employment agreement
with Wachovia, if his employment with Wachovia were to cease, he
may be eligible to receive payments under Wachovias
severance plan generally available to Wachovia employees. In
such event, Wachovias severance plan would entitle him,
based on his years of service, to receive 16 months of base
salary which would amount to $1,453,333 as of December 31,
2006.
Insurance
Bonus Agreement
As indicated in footnote (5)(a) to Summary
Compensation Table, following termination of his split
dollar life insurance agreement in 2003, Mr. Thompson and
Wachovia entered into two Insurance Bonus Agreements in 2003 and
2004 to compensate him for the cost of obtaining and maintaining
personal supplemental life insurance benefits in lieu of his
split-dollar life insurance arrangement.
The aggregate amount payable under Mr. Thompsons
Insurance Bonus Agreements calculated based on the later of his
or his spouses life expectancy using the RP2000 mortality
tables projected forward six years and a 5.50% discount rate
would be approximately $878,426 over the life of those
agreements, which includes a tax gross-up. Annual bonus amounts
are paid by Wachovia directly to the insurer for his benefit.
His Insurance Bonus Agreements terminate generally upon the
earlier of: (i) the later of his or his spouses
death; (ii) termination of his employment, other than
termination due to retirement with Wachovias consent; or
(iii) by Wachovia for any reason other than for cause or
due to long-term disability, provided that this later
termination event would not apply after a change in control of
Wachovia.
Incentive
Award
In event of a change of control, the covered officer
incentive component of the SIP provides that incentive awards
will be paid out based on Wachovias adjusted net income
for the prior year or other method of payment as determined by
the Compensation Committee for the award. Assuming a change of
control of Wachovia occurred as of December 31, 2006,
Mr. Thompson would be entitled to receive his annual cash
incentive award based on current year performance. The actual
incentive amount paid for
42
2006 is reflected in the column titled Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation in Summary Compensation
Table.
Benefits
Generally Available to All Employees
Mr. Thompson also would be entitled to receive certain
benefits available to Wachovia employees generally, including
accrued vacation, 401(k) savings plan and other deferred
compensation distributions, retiree medical benefits, group and
supplemental life insurance benefits and short-term and
long-term disability benefits. He was eligible for early
retirement on December 31, 2006 and, therefore, would be
entitled to retiree medical benefits under Wachovias
Retiree Health and Welfare Program. See also Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Table and Pension Benefits
Table for balances Mr. Thompson may be entitled to receive
following termination.
Messrs. Wurtz,
Jenkins, Cummings and Carroll
The following table sets forth information about potential
payments to Messrs. Wurtz, Jenkins, Cummings and Carroll in
the event their employment was terminated or following a change
in control of Wachovia. Refer to the footnotes following the
table for an explanation of the presentation. See also
Employment Agreements below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEVERANCE COMPENSATION
|
|
|
BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
Medical,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Dental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated -
|
|
|
Accelerated -
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Rata
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options/
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
280G Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Bonus ($)(1)
|
|
|
Severance ($)(2)
|
|
|
SARs ($)(3)
|
|
|
Awards ($)(3)
|
|
|
Benefits ($)(4)
|
|
|
Perquisites ($)(5)
|
|
|
Gross-Up ($)(6)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary Termination
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
By Company without Cause (8)
|
|
|
1,600,000
|
|
|
|
4,101,000
|
|
|
|
764,316
|
|
|
|
1,723,877
|
|
|
|
135,486
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8,374,679
|
|
By Company with Cause
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
By Company without Cause or by
Executive for Good Reason (9)(10)
|
|
|
1,600,000
|
|
|
|
4,101,000
|
|
|
|
764,316
|
|
|
|
1,723,877
|
|
|
|
135,486
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
159,750
|
|
|
|
8,534,429
|
|
Change in Control (without
termination)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
764,316
|
|
|
|
1,723,877
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,488,193
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
1,600,000
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
764,316
|
|
|
|
1,723,877
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,513,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Retirement (7)
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,938,243
|
|
|
|
6,097,181
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13,735,424
|
|
By Company without Cause (8)
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
13,326,000
|
|
|
|
3,938,243
|
|
|
|
6,097,181
|
|
|
|
155,854
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
27,287,278
|
|
By Company with Cause
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
By Company without Cause or by
Executive for Good Reason (9)
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
13,326,000
|
|
|
|
3,938,243
|
|
|
|
6,097,181
|
|
|
|
562,736
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
6,396,563
|
|
|
|
34,090,723
|
|
Change in Control (without
termination)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,938,243
|
|
|
|
6,097,181
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,035,424
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
3,700,000
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
3,938,243
|
|
|
|
6,097,181
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
14,435,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Retirement (7)
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,871,288
|
|
|
|
3,948,856
|
|
|
|
575,031
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,145,175
|
|
By Company without Cause (8)
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
12,840,000
|
|
|
|
1,871,288
|
|
|
|
3,948,856
|
|
|
|
795,275
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
23,275,419
|
|
By Company with Cause
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
By Company without Cause or by
Executive for Good Reason (9)
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
12,840,000
|
|
|
|
1,871,288
|
|
|
|
3,948,856
|
|
|
|
1,819,640
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
5,101,139
|
|
|
|
29,400,923
|
|
Change in Control (without
termination)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,871,288
|
|
|
|
3,948,856
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,820,144
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
1,871,288
|
|
|
|
3,948,856
|
|
|
|
575,031
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,645,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary Termination
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
By Company without Cause (8)
|
|
|
2,750,000
|
|
|
|
10,291,560
|
|
|
|
2,430,322
|
|
|
|
3,708,812
|
|
|
|
211,509
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
19,462,203
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEVERANCE COMPENSATION
|
|
|
BENEFITS AND PERQUISITES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
Medical,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Dental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated -
|
|
|
Accelerated -
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Rata
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options/
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
280G Tax
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Bonus ($)(1)
|
|
|
Severance ($)(2)
|
|
|
SARs ($)(3)
|
|
|
Awards ($)(3)
|
|
|
Benefits ($)(4)
|
|
|
Perquisites ($)(5)
|
|
|
Gross-Up ($)(6)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
By Company with Cause
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
By Company without Cause or by
Executive for Good Reason (9)
|
|
|
2,750,000
|
|
|
|
10,291,560
|
|
|
|
2,430,322
|
|
|
|
3,708,812
|
|
|
|
1,174,648
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
4,893,286
|
|
|
|
25,318,628
|
|
Change in Control (without
termination)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,430,322
|
|
|
|
3,708,812
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6,139,134
|
|
Death or Disability
|
|
|
2,750,000
|
|
|
|
642,000
|
|
|
|
2,430,322
|
|
|
|
3,708,812
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
9,531,134
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prorated based on a
365-day
calendar year using a December 31, 2006 termination date
and the higher of the executives current target incentive
award or highest incentive award paid during the prior three
calendar years. Amounts differ from the annual cash incentive
award for the executives in Summary Compensation
Table because the 2006 incentive award had not been
determined as of December 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents severance payments in accordance with individual
employment agreements as further detailed in
Employment Agreements below. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Values for stock options have been calculated using the
difference between $56.95 and the option exercise price;
restricted stock awards valued at $56.95. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents medical, dental and life insurance coverage benefits
outlined in the table below, valued at the incremental cost to
Wachovia of providing such benefits for the time periods
indicated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
Life (e)
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Medical Insurance
Coverage ($)(a)
|
|
|
121,900
|
|
|
|
121,900
|
|
|
|
106,700
|
|
|
|
475,400
|
|
|
|
185,800
|
|
|
|
1,122,600
|
|
|
|
183,000
|
|
|
|
1,064,500
|
|
Dental Insurance
Coverage ($)(a)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
3,300
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Life Insurance Coverage ($)(b)
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
12,700
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
11,100
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
14,500
|
|
Supplemental Life Insurance
Benefits ($)(c)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
575,031
|
|
|
|
575,031
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Executive Life Insurance
Program ($)(d)
|
|
|
11,986
|
|
|
|
11,986
|
|
|
|
45,954
|
|
|
|
72,736
|
|
|
|
31,844
|
|
|
|
107,609
|
|
|
|
25,709
|
|
|
|
95,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
135,486
|
|
|
|
135,486
|
|
|
|
155,854
|
|
|
|
562,736
|
|
|
|
795,275
|
|
|
|
1,819,640
|
|
|
|
211,509
|
|
|
|
1,174,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects the maximum projected cost of continued coverage under
Wachovias special medical program for the executive and
his family for the period indicated based the executives
elections for coverage in 2007. Assumes the following:
(i) participation of the executives children until
age 26; (ii) at age 65, that Medicare pays 65% of
the cost of coverage; (iii) a 5.50% discount rate;
(iv) an annual rate of cost increase ranging from 5% to 10%
depending on the particular year; and (v) life expectancies
for the executive and his spouse based on the RP2000 mortality
tables projected forward six years. |
|
(b) |
|
Reflects the cost of continued coverage under Wachovias
group life insurance plan (providing a benefit equal to base
salary) for the period indicated. Assumes a 5.50% discount rate
and life expectancies for the executive based on the RP2000
mortality tables projected forward six years. |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
For Mr. Cummings, amount reflects aggregate bonuses payable
over the life of his Insurance Bonus Agreement calculated based
on the longer life expectancy of the executive or his spouse
using the RP2000 mortality tables projected forward six years
and a 5.50% discount rate. No cost has been reported in the
above table in the event of a change in control without
termination as |
44
|
|
|
|
|
these payments would continue during ongoing employment. See
additional discussion in footnote (5)(a) to Summary
Compensation Table. |
|
(d) |
|
Reflects the cost of continued coverage under Wachovias
executive life insurance plan (providing a benefit up to eight
times base salary) for the period indicated. Assumes a 5.50%
discount rate and the remaining term of payment obligation on
the existing policies. |
|
(e) |
|
Reflects the cost of continued coverage at active employee rates
for two years after which time Mr. Wurtz is entitled to
continued participation in such programs or plans, as
applicable, upon payment to Wachovia of its cost of providing
such coverage. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Represents continued participation in Wachovias fringe
benefit or perquisite plans or programs in which the executive
participated immediately prior to his date of termination for a
three year period (two years in the case of Mr. Wurtz) as
outlined in the table below, valued at the incremental cost to
Wachovia of providing such benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wurtz
|
|
|
Jenkins
|
|
|
Cummings
|
|
|
Carroll
|
|
|
Financial Planning ($)(a)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
Outplacement Services ($)(b)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Executive Physical ($)(c)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents reimbursement of financial planning expenses incurred
by the executive (subject to an annual maximum of $15,000). |
|
(b) |
|
Represents outplacement services to which the executive is
entitled for a maximum period of 12 months based on current
annual base salary level. This benefit is available generally to
all involuntarily terminated employees although the benefit
amount varies by salary level. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents reimbursement for the cost of executive physicals
(subject to a maximum of $7,500 every 18 months). |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Assumes a Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code excise
tax rate of 20%, the Medicare rate is 1.45% (assumes the Social
Security Wage Base is reached based on other income prior to
application of the
gross-up),
the Federal tax rate is 35%, the applicable state tax rate is
North Carolina at 8% and the city/local tax rate is 0%. The
effective Federal tax rate used to calculate the excise tax
gross-up is
32.8125%. All amounts would be paid by Wachovia directly to the
relevant taxing authority on behalf of the executive. Amounts
presented assume that stock options are cashed out for a payment
equal to the difference between $56.95 and the option exercise
price in the event of a change in control of Wachovia. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Assumes the executive is early retirement eligible as of
December 31, 2006 based on the eligibility requirements of
Wachovias pension plan. Messrs. Carroll and Wurtz
were not eligible for early retirement on such date. |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Assumes a termination by Wachovia without cause or by the
executive for good reason. Assumes the executives
termination-related benefit includes: (i) a pro rata
incentive award for the period through the executives
termination date, based on the highest incentive award paid
during either the three calendar years prior to termination or
the executives then applicable target incentive award;
(ii) an amount equal to three times (two times in the case
of Mr. Wurtz) the executives annual base salary and
the highest incentive award determined in accordance with
(i) above; (iii) an amount equal to three times (two
times in the case of Mr. Wurtz) the highest matching
contribution by Wachovia for the executives benefit in
Wachovias 401(k) savings plan and Savings Restoration Plan
for the preceding five years (three years in the case of
Mr. Wurtz); (iv) medical, dental and life insurance
benefits for the executive and family members for three years
(two years in the case of Mr. Wurtz) after the termination
date. See footnote (4) above for a detail of medical,
dental, and life insurance benefits; and (v) other
perquisites. |
45
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Assumes a termination by Wachovia (or its successor) without
cause or by the executive for good reason following a
change-in-control. In addition to the severance benefits
described in footnote (8) above, assumes that the
executives severance benefit includes medical, dental and
life insurance benefits for the executive and his family for
life because the termination date follows a change in
control of Wachovia. See footnote (4) above for a
detail of medical, dental, and life insurance benefits. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Aggregate termination-related benefits payable to Mr. Wurtz
reflect a reduction of $2,010,938 in accordance with the
severance limitations as provided in his employment agreement
and Wachovias Severance Policy (discussed below in
Employment Agreements). The 280G excise tax
gross-up benefit as reported reflects this reduction. |
Employment
Agreements
Messrs.
Wurtz, Jenkins, Cummings and Carroll
As discussed in Compensation Discussion &
Analysis, Wachovia has entered into employment agreements
with Messrs. Wurtz, Jenkins, Carroll and Cummings. Each of
these employment agreements has an initial employment period of
three years and is automatically extended on an annual basis
unless either party determines otherwise prior to the annual
extension date.
Consistent with Wachovias Severance Policy for Shareholder
Approval of Future Severance Agreements (the Severance
Policy) adopted by the board in August 2006, the aggregate
amount of all severance benefits to which Mr. Wurtz is
entitled under his agreement will not exceed 2.99 times his
annual base salary plus his highest annual incentive award
awarded in any of the last three fiscal years as determined in
accordance with the terms of the Severance Policy. The other
employment agreements were entered into prior to the Severance
Policys adoption. For additional information on
Wachovias Severance Policy, see Post-Termination
Compensation and BenefitsEmployment Agreements under
Compensation Discussion & Analysis.
Payments
Upon Termination Due to Early or Normal Retirement
The employment agreements provide that if the executive
terminates employment due to early retirement or normal
retirement (assuming normal retirement age of 65 as provided
under Wachovias tax qualified pension plan) during the
three year term of the agreement (two year term in the case of
Mr. Wurtz), the executive will be entitled to a pro rata
annual incentive award for the period prior to the termination
date, based on the highest incentive award paid during either
the three calendar years prior to termination or the
executives then current target incentive award. For a
description of stock award acceleration upon termination due to
retirement, see Stock Award Acceleration below.
In addition, the executive would be entitled to benefits under
Wachovias Retiree Health and Welfare Program. Because this
program is available generally to all retired employees, no
amounts are presented in the table above for continued retiree
medical and dental coverage under these circumstances.
Payments
Upon Involuntary not for Cause Termination and Termination for
Good Reason
The employment agreements provide that if Wachovia terminates
the executives employment for reasons other than
cause, death, disability or retirement or the
executive terminates employment for good reason,
then the executive will be entitled to receive: (i) a pro
rata annual incentive award for the period through the
executives termination date, based on the highest
incentive award paid during either the three calendar years
prior to termination or the executives then applicable
target incentive award; (ii) an amount equal to three times
(two times in the case of Mr. Wurtz) the executives
annual base salary and the highest incentive award determined
under (i) above; and (iii) medical, dental and life
insurance benefits for the executive and his family for three
years (two years in the case of Mr. Wurtz) after the
termination date (or for life if the termination date occurs
after a change in control of Wachovia). Each
executive is also entitled to a cash payment equal to the
highest matching contribution by Wachovia for the
executives benefit in Wachovias 401(k) savings plan
and Savings Restoration Plan for the five years (three years in
46
the case of Mr. Wurtz) prior to termination for a three
year period (two year period in the case of Mr. Wurtz).
Such amounts are payable to the executive in equal annual
installments.
In addition, the executive is entitled to continue to
participate in Wachovias fringe benefit and perquisite
plans or programs in which the executive participated
immediately prior to his date of termination for a three year
period (two years in the case of Mr. Wurtz). Those benefits
include reimbursement of financial planning expenses (subject to
an annual maximum of $15,000 under current company policy) and
reimbursement of costs for executive physicals (subject to a
maximum of $7,500 every 18 months under current company
policy). For purposes of the table above, Wachovia has assumed
the maximum amount reimbursable to the executive for financial
planning and executive physical expenses.
A termination is for cause if it is for any of the
following reasons: (i) the continued and willful failure of
the executive to perform substantially the executives
duties with Wachovia (other than any such failure resulting from
incapacity due to physical or mental illness), after a written
demand for substantial performance is delivered to the executive
by Wachovia which specifically identifies the manner in which
Wachovia believes that the executive has not substantially
performed the executives duties and a reasonable time for
such substantial performance has elapsed since delivery of such
demand; or (ii) the willful engaging by the executive in
illegal conduct or gross misconduct which is materially
injurious to Wachovia.
A termination is for good reason if it is for any of
the following reasons:
(ia) as applicable to Messrs. Jenkins, Carroll and
Cummings only, the substantial diminution in the overall
importance of the executives role, as determined by
balancing (A) any increase or decrease in the scope of the
executives management responsibilities against
(B) any increase or decrease in the relative sizes of the
businesses, activities or functions (or portions thereof) for
which the executive has responsibility; provided, however, that
none of (I) a change in the executives title,
(II) a change in the hierarchy, (III) a change in the
executives responsibilities from line to staff or vice
versa, and (IV) placing the executive on temporary leave
pending an inquiry into whether the executive has engaged in
conduct that could constitute cause under the
agreement, either individually or in the aggregate shall be
considered good reason;
(ib) as applicable to Mr. Wurtz only, prior to
a change in control, the substantial diminution in
the overall importance of the executives role, as
determined by a reduction in the executives targeted
annual incentive award opportunity (but not a reduction in the
executives actual annual incentive award payment),
targeted stock-based incentive compensation opportunity (but not
a reduction in the executives actual stock-based incentive
awards) or the executive no longer being deemed to be an
executive officer of Wachovia as determined by the
board; provided, however, that none of (A) a change in the
executives title, (B) a change in the hierarchy,
(C) a change in the executives responsibilities from
line to staff or vice versa, and (D) placing the executive
on temporary leave pending an inquiry into whether the executive
has engaged in conduct that could constitute cause
under the agreement, either individually or in the aggregate
shall be considered good reason;
(ii) any failure by Wachovia to comply with any material
provision of the agreement, other than an isolated,
insubstantial and inadvertent failure not occurring in bad faith
and which is remedied by Wachovia promptly after receipt of
notice thereof given by the executive;
(iii) any purported termination by Wachovia of the
executives employment otherwise than as expressly
permitted by the agreement;
(iv) as applicable to Messrs. Jenkins, Carroll and
Cummings only, at any time prior to the executive reaching
age 63, Wachovia giving notice to the executive of its
intention not to extend the term of the agreement;
(v) following a change in control, the
relocation of the principal place of the executives
employment to a location that is more than 35 miles from
such principal place of employment immediately prior to the date
the proposed change in control is publicly
announced, or Wachovia requiring the executive
47
to travel on company business to a substantially greater extent
than required immediately prior to the change in
control;
(vi) following a change in control,
Wachovias requiring the executive or all or substantially
all of the Wachovia employees who report directly to the
executive immediately prior to the date the proposed
change in control is publicly announced to be based
at any office or location other than such persons office
or location on such date;
(vii) any failure by Wachovia to require any successor by
purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise to assume and agree
to perform Wachovias obligations under the
agreement; or
(viii) following a change in control,
assignment to the executive of any duties inconsistent in any
respect with the executives position as in effect
immediately prior to the public announcement of the proposed
change in control (including status, offices, titles
and reporting requirements), authority, duties or
responsibilities, or any other action by Wachovia which results
in any diminution in such position, authority, duties or
responsibilities.
Payments
upon Termination in Connection with a Change in Control or upon
a Change in Control
The employment agreements provide that if Wachovia terminates
the executives employment without cause or the
executive terminates his employment for good reason
in connection with or following a change in control,
then the executive will be entitled to the benefits described
above under Payments Upon Involuntary not for Cause
Termination and Termination for Good Reason and presented
in the table above. In addition, the executive will be entitled
to medical, dental and life insurance benefits for the executive
and family members for life (rather than for three years, or two
years in the case of Mr. Wurtz) if the termination date
occurs after a change in control of Wachovia.
Upon the occurrence of a change of control under the
covered officer incentive component of the SIP, the executive
will be entitled to payment of his annual performance-based cash
incentive award based on Wachovias adjusted net income for
the prior year or other method of payment as determined by the
Compensation Committee for the award. For purposes of this
discussion, Wachovia has assumed the annual cash incentive award
is the higher of the executives current target incentive
award or highest incentive award paid during the prior three
years.
For a description of stock award acceleration upon a
change of control under the SIP, see
Stock Award Acceleration below.
A change in control under each executives
employment agreement means any of the following:
(i) The acquisition by any individual, entity or group of
beneficial ownership of 20% or more of either
(A) Wachovias then outstanding shares of common stock
or (B) the combined voting power of Wachovias then
outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors; provided, however, that the following
acquisitions will not constitute a change in
control: (1) any acquisition directly from Wachovia;
(2) any acquisition by Wachovia; or (3) any
acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust)
sponsored or maintained by Wachovia or any corporation
controlled by Wachovia; or
(ii) Individuals who constitute the current incumbent board
cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the
board unless the change in control is approved by a vote of at
least a majority of the then incumbent directors; or
(iii) A reorganization, merger, share exchange or
consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or
substantially all of Wachovias assets, unless (A) Wachovia
stockholders immediately prior to the transaction owning at
least 60% of the then outstanding shares of common stock and the
combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities
of Wachovia entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, as the case may be, own then outstanding shares of
common stock and the combined voting power of the then
outstanding voting securities of the resulting corporation in
substantially the same proportion as their ownership immediately
prior to the business combination,
48
(B) no person (excluding any corporation resulting from a
business combination or any employee benefit plan (or related
trust) of Wachovia or such corporation resulting from the
business combination) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly,
20% or more of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of
common stock of the corporation resulting from a business
combination or the combined voting power of the then outstanding
voting securities of such corporation except to the extent that
such ownership existed prior to the business combination and
(C) at least a majority of the members of the board of
directors of the resulting corporation were members of the
incumbent board immediately prior to the time of the execution
of the initial agreement, or of the action of the board,
providing for such a business combination; or
(iv) Approval by Wachovias stockholders of a complete
liquidation or dissolution of Wachovia.
Payments
Upon Termination Due to Death or Disability
The employment agreements provide that if the executives
employment terminates due to death or disability, the executive
will be entitled to payment of (1) a pro rata annual
incentive award for the period prior to the termination date,
based on the highest incentive award paid during either the
three calendar years prior to termination or the
executives then applicable target incentive award and
(2) an amount equal to the executives annual base
salary. For a description of stock award acceleration upon
termination due to death or disability, see Stock
Award Acceleration below.
Assuming that the employment of Messrs. Carroll, Cummings,
Jenkins or Wurtz terminated upon a disability as provided under
their employment agreements, they would not be entitled to
disability benefits under Wachovias group or executive
long-term disability plans in addition to the employment
agreement payments reflected in the table above.
Non-Compete,
Non-Solicitation, Non-Disparagement and Confidentiality
Agreements
Each executives employment agreement also contains
obligations on the part of the executive regarding
non-competition following employment termination in certain
circumstances, non-solicitation of employees for a period of
three years following employment termination, confidentiality of
information obtained while employed with Wachovia and
non-disparagement of the business, goodwill or reputation of
Wachovia. The non-competition agreement generally prohibits the
executive for a period of three years from termination from
becoming a director, officer or consultant for any business
competing with any Wachovia line of business in which the
executive participated while a Wachovia employee and which
competing business is located in the geographic areas of
Wachovia Bank, National Association. The non-competition
agreement will not apply if the executive terminates employment
due to retirement or for any reason following a change in
control, if Wachovia terminates the executives
employment for any reason following a change in
control, or if the term of the employment agreement
expires due to failure of the executive or Wachovia to extend
its term. The confidentiality and non-disparagement obligations
have no set term.
Stock
Award Acceleration
Unless superceded by the terms of another agreement, the terms
of stock awards are governed by the SIP and the applicable stock
award grant agreement.
In the event of termination due to early or normal retirement,
the executive will be entitled to accelerated vesting of all
outstanding stock option awards and automatic termination of any
remaining period of restriction applicable to all outstanding
restricted stock awards under the SIP. For purposes of the
presentation in the table above, Wachovia has assumed that the
Compensation Committee consented to the executives early
retirement.
49
|
|
|
|
|
Death, Displacement or Disability
|
In the event of termination due to death, displacement (as
interpreted under Wachovias severance plan) or disability,
the executive will be entitled to accelerated vesting of all
outstanding stock option awards and automatic termination of any
remaining period of restriction applicable to all outstanding
restricted stock awards under the SIP.
|
|
|
|
|
Change of Control under SIP
|
In the event of a change of control of Wachovia, the
executive will be entitled to accelerated vesting of all
outstanding stock option awards and automatic termination of any
remaining period of restriction applicable to all outstanding
restricted stock awards under the SIP. For purposes of the SIP,
a change of control has the same meaning as in the
employment agreements described above, except that the
beneficial ownership percentage in the first sentence of
(i) in that definition is 25% instead of 20%.
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary Termination Other Than For Cause, Death, Disability
or Retirement or Good Reason Termination
|
The employment agreements provide that if Wachovia terminates
the executives employment for reasons other than
cause, death, disability or retirement or the
executive terminates employment for good reason,
then the executive will be entitled to continued vesting of all
stock options and restricted stock awards for a period of three
years (two years in the case of Mr. Wurtz) and, to the
extent not otherwise vested at the end of that period,
accelerated vesting of all unvested stock options and restricted
stock awards. Notwithstanding the executives termination
of employment, all stock options granted to the executive will
also remain exercisable until the scheduled expiration date of
the option.
In the event that termination of employment occurs after a
change of control under the SIP, the executive would
be entitled to stock award acceleration under the SIP as
described above. Any stock awards made subsequent to the
change of control under the SIP would be subject to
continued vesting and acceleration as described above. For
purposes of the presentation in the table above, Wachovia has
assumed that the change of control event and
termination of employment occurred on the same day.
Insurance
Bonus Agreements
As indicated in footnote (5)(a) to Summary
Compensation Table, following termination of his split
dollar life insurance agreement in 2003, Mr. Cummings
entered into an Insurance Bonus Agreement with Wachovia to
compensate him for the cost of obtaining and maintaining
personal supplemental life insurance benefits in lieu of his
split-dollar life insurance arrangement. Annual bonus amounts
are paid by Wachovia directly to the insurer for
Mr. Cummings benefit and provide a tax gross-up. As a
condition to such payments, Mr. Cummings agreed not to
(a) exchange or surrender any part of the policy,
(b) obtain a loan against the policy from the insurer,
(c) assign any part of the policy as collateral security,
(d) change the ownership of any part of the policy by
endorsement or assignment or (e) request a settlement of
the proceeds of the policy under any method of settlement other
than one which is in reference to the life of the insured.
Mr. Cummings agreement terminates generally upon the
later of his or his spouses death.
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
See Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table for
aggregate balances the executive would be entitled to receive
under all Wachovia-sponsored non-qualified defined contribution
and other deferred compensation plans as of December 31,
2006.
Pension
Benefits
See Pension Benefits Table for the present value of
the accumulated benefits payable to each executive upon
retirement under Wachovias tax qualified pension plan.
Such amounts would be payable to each executive in either a lump
sum or annuity based on the executives elections under the
pension plan.
50
Outplacement
Services
The executive is entitled to career transition or outplacement
support in accordance with Wachovias policies for all
displaced employees. The level of benefit provided is dependent
upon the employees salary at the time of displacement. For
executives, this benefit would be provided for a maximum period
of 12 months. For purposes of presentation in the table,
Wachovia has assumed a maximum cost of $10,000 for that
12 month benefit. Each employment agreement provides that
the executive is entitled to receive this benefit upon a
termination for good reason as well.
280G Tax
Gross-Up
Each executives employment agreement provides for a
gross-up
payment equal to the amount of federal excise taxes under
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (plus the
applicable federal and state income, FICA and excise taxes due
on such
gross-up
payment) payable by the executive in conjunction with a
change in control of Wachovia and such taxes become
payable, as a result of payments under the agreement or
otherwise, and are deemed to be excess parachute
payments for federal income tax purposes. Amounts shown in
the table above do not take into account mitigation for payments
made to the executive in consideration of non-competition
obligations or as reasonable compensation. Any such payments for
Mr. Wurtz may be subject to the limits imposed by his
employment agreement pursuant to Wachovias Severance
Policy.
Benefits
Generally Available to All Employees
Each of the executives also will be entitled to receive certain
benefits available to Wachovia employees generally, including
accrued vacation, 401(k) savings plan distributions, retiree
medical benefits, group and supplemental life insurance benefits
and short-term and long-term disability benefits.
Because each of Messrs. Jenkins, Carroll, Cummings and
Wurtz have an employment agreement with Wachovia providing for
severance compensation in lieu of any severance compensation
otherwise offered to Wachovia employees, none of these
executives would receive any severance compensation pursuant to
Wachovias severance plan in the event of displacement.
Mr. Malone
On January 31, 2006, Mr. Malone terminated his employment
with Wachovia and retired. As previously disclosed in
Wachovias proxy statement for its 2006 annual meeting of
stockholders and the joint proxy statement/prospectus for the
special meeting of stockholders to approve Wachovias
merger with SouthTrust, Mr. Malone entered into an amended
and restated employment agreement with SouthTrust in January
1996, which obligations Wachovia assumed in the
November 2004 Wachovia-SouthTrust merger. Following the
merger, certain changes to his duties entitled him to terminate
employment with Wachovia for good reason under his
employment agreement. His 2006 retirement had the effect of
terminating his employment agreement for good
reason, as well as the Wallace D. Malone, Jr.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan and Agreement, as
amended, and the Wallace D. Malone, Jr. Second Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Plan and Agreement. Upon his retirement
and as previously disclosed in Wachovias prior proxy
statements, he became entitled to certain benefits under various
other benefit plans, including Wachovias deferred
compensation plan, the SouthTrust non-contributory, defined
benefit pension plan for all SouthTrust employees and several
supplemental retirement arrangements which SouthTrust maintained
and which obligations Wachovia assumed following the SouthTrust
merger.
Employment
Agreement
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, in addition
to amounts already earned, Mr. Malone became entitled to
receive annual termination payments for a period of five years
following retirement in the amount of $6.67 million ($33.34
million in the aggregate), which is equal to his annual base
salary immediately prior to retirement ($1 million) and his
highest annual incentive compensation for the prior five year
period ($5.67 million). His employment agreement also
entitled him to retain the automobile
51
owned by Wachovia that he was using at the time of his
retirement, valued at approximately $78,400 (including the tax
gross-up thereon). In accordance with his employment agreement,
he will be provided with office space and administrative support
for a period of five years. The expected cost of comparable
office space and administrative support is $320,000 annually,
including a tax
gross-up for
the tax impact. Additional payments of $7.449 million were
made under his employment agreement to reimburse him for excise
taxes that may be owed in the event that payments under his
employment agreement are excess parachute payments
under Internal Revenue Code Section 280G. Pursuant to the
terms of an amendment to his employment agreement in December
2005 to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code, a six-month delay period applied to all
payments to which he became entitled under his employment
agreement. Termination-related payments in 2006, including the
excise tax reimbursement, are described in Summary
Compensation Table.
Stock
Awards
On his retirement, Mr. Malone held stock options that had
not yet become vested. Because he met the requirements for
retirement under the terms of those stock options
and the applicable stock incentive plans under which the stock
awards were granted, the unvested portion of the stock awards
became vested at retirement and the stock options will remain
exercisable for their full term. On his retirement, he became
vested in 585,825 non-qualified stock options with a value of
$2,606,917 based on the January 31, 2006 closing price of
Wachovia common stock. See also Outstanding Equity Awards
at Fiscal Year-End Table.
Deferred
Compensation Benefits
During his employment with SouthTrust and Wachovia,
Mr. Malone participated in deferred compensation benefit
plans pursuant to which he elected to defer receipt of
compensation previously earned and reported in SouthTrusts
and Wachovias respective proxy statements during the
applicable period. Amounts deferred increase or decrease in
value based on the investment elections of the participants in
such plans. Under his Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
and Agreement, as amended, SouthTrust granted him certain shares
of restricted stock units. Such restricted stock units became
payable in shares of Wachovia common stock on January 15,
2007. See footnote (8) to Outstanding Equity Awards
at Fiscal Year-End Table. Under the Wachovia Elective
Deferral Plan and the Amended and Restated SouthTrust Deferred
Compensation Plan, he previously earned and reported certain
compensation benefits. He started receiving annual distributions
under these plans in 2006 to be provided over 10 years and
15 years, respectively. Under the Wachovia Savings
Restoration Plan available to certain Wachovia executives, he is
entitled to receive annual distributions for a period of ten
years. As of December 31, 2006, he had a deferred balance
in the Wachovia Savings Restoration Plan of $107,917. See
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table for
additional detail on all non-qualified defined contribution and
other deferred compensation plans as of December 31, 2006.
Pension
and Additional Supplemental Retirement Benefits
Mr. Malone participated in several defined benefit
retirement plans as outlined in Pension Benefits
Table and supporting discussions. Plan balances were
distributed in lump sum payments to him in 2006.
In addition, he participated in the SouthTrust Corporation
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan through which he is
currently receiving an annual payment of $480,000. This plan
provides for payments for the greater of 15 years or his
lifetime, with distributions having commenced in 1996.
Miscellaneous
Mr. Malone is also entitled to receive certain benefits
generally payable to retired Wachovia employees, including
accrued vacation, of which $238,462 was paid upon his
retirement, and 401(k) savings plan payments.
52
In addition, he receives annual imputed income representing the
economic benefit on a split-dollar life insurance policy assumed
by Wachovia in connection with the SouthTrust merger. The income
imputed in 2006 is included in the supplemental life insurance
amount disclosed in footnote (5) in Summary
Compensation Table. He will continue to have imputed
income in future years while the policy remains in place.
The non-competition provision of his employment agreement will
apply for a period of thirty-six months following retirement.
Mr. Kelly
On January 31, 2006, Mr. Kelly voluntarily terminated
his employment with Wachovia to accept a position at another
financial services firm. As a result, he terminated his
employment agreement with Wachovia. Pursuant to the terms of the
employment agreement, he was not entitled to receive any
benefits as a result of this voluntary termination other than
his annual base salary through the date of termination (in the
amount of $56,061), the amount of any compensation he previously
deferred, and other benefits available generally to Wachovia
employees, in each case only to the extent owing and unpaid as
of his termination date.
Mr. Kelly received full distribution of his non-qualified
deferred compensation balances in 2006. See Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Table.
As noted in Pension Benefits Table and supporting
discussions, he is fully vested in the Wachovia Pension Plan. He
has not made an election as to how he will receive these
benefits.
In addition, Wachovia recommended to the Compensation Committee
that Mr. Kelly receive an annual cash incentive award
earned for 2005 equal to his target award amount of $2,000,000.
Wachovia paid an annual cash incentive award in that amount to
him in 2006 as was reported in Wachovias proxy statement
for the 2006 annual meeting of stockholders. He continues to be
bound by the non-solicitation and confidentiality obligations
under his employment agreement.
Ms. Davis
Ms. Davis entered into an employment agreement with
Wachovia in November 2001. The terms of her employment
agreement, as amended, entitled her to terminate employment with
Wachovia for any reason between January 1, 2006 and
March 31, 2006. Ms. Davis gave notice of such election
in that period and on May 31, 2006, she terminated her
employment with Wachovia.
Employment
Agreement
Pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement, in addition
to amounts already earned, Ms. Davis received a pro rata
incentive award for 2006 in the amount of $661,918, based on the
highest incentive award paid to her during the three calendar
years prior to her termination. In addition, she is entitled to
receive an annual compensation continuance payment for a period
of three years following her retirement in the amount of
$2.122 million ($6.365 million in the aggregate),
which equals her annual base salary immediately prior to
retirement ($492,000), plus her highest annual incentive award
for the prior five year period ($1.6 million), plus the
highest matching contribution made by Wachovia for her benefit
in Wachovias 401(k) savings plan and Savings Restoration
Plan during the five years prior to her retirement ($29,520).
Under her employment agreement, she is also entitled to
reimbursement of financial planning expenses (subject to an
annual maximum of $15,000) during the three-year compensation
continuance period (for an aggregate of $45,000).
Pursuant to the terms of an amendment to her employment
agreement in December 2005 to comply with the requirements of
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, a six-month
delay period applied to all
53
payments to which she is entitled under her employment
agreement. Termination-related payments in 2006 are described in
Summary Compensation Table.
The non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disparagement and
confidentiality provisions of her employment agreement will
apply during the three-year compensation continuance period.
Stock
Award Acceleration
On her termination, Ms. Davis held certain stock awards
that had not yet vested. These unvested stock awards will
continue to vest over the three-year compensation continuance
period after which the unvested portion of the stock awards will
fully vest and the stock options will remain exercisable for
their full term. As of December 31, 2006, she held 181,066
unvested stock options and 41,563 unvested restricted stock
awards previously granted having a value of $2,224,417 and
$2,367,013, respectively, based on a $56.95 Wachovia stock
price. See Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Table for additional detail.
Deferred
Compensation and Pension Benefits
During her employment with Wachovia, Ms. Davis participated
in deferred compensation benefit plans pursuant to which she
elected to defer receipt of compensation previously earned.
Amounts deferred increase or decrease in value based on the
investment elections of the participants in such plans. See
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table for
aggregate balances she is entitled to under all
Wachovia-sponsored non-qualified defined contribution and other
deferred compensation plans as of December 31, 2006.
Under the Wachovia Pension Plan and Trust, she is entitled to a
lump sum payment which was made to her in December 2006.
Pursuant to the terms of her employment agreement, she is
entitled to three additional years of service credit under her
SERA. At the end of the three-year compensation continuance
period under her employment agreement, the estimated net present
value of the accrued benefit to which she will be entitled under
her SERA will be $9,195,127. This amount reflects an accrued
benefit of $1,536,158 associated with continued service credit
under the SERA during the three-year compensation continuance
period. See Pension Benefits Table for additional
detail.
Medical,
Dental, Life and Disability Coverage
Ms. Davis is also entitled to medical, dental and life
insurance benefits for herself and family members at active
employee rates for three years after her retirement date. The
incremental cost to Wachovia of providing such benefits under
Wachovias special medical program and group life insurance
plan (providing a benefit equal to base salary), assuming a
5.50% discount rate for benefits remaining to be paid, an annual
rate of cost increase ranging from 5% to 10% depending on the
particular year and life expectancies for the executive based on
the RP2000 mortality tables (projected forward six years) are as
follows: Medical$188,600; Dental$400; and
Life$2,100. In addition, an annual $6,050 premium will be
paid for her executive life insurance policy over the three-year
compensation continuance period.
Insurance
Bonus Agreement
As indicated in footnote (5)(a) to Summary
Compensation Table, following termination of her split
dollar life insurance agreement in 2003, Ms. Davis and
Wachovia entered into an Insurance Bonus Agreement to compensate
her for the cost of obtaining and maintaining personal
supplemental life insurance benefits in lieu of her split-dollar
life insurance arrangements.
Based on the longer life expectancy of her or her spouse using
the RP2000 mortality tables projected forward six years and a
5.50% discount rate, the aggregate amount payable under her
Insurance Bonus Agreement would be approximately $1,007,464 over
the life of that agreement. Annual bonus amounts are paid by
Wachovia directly to the insurer for her benefit and do not
reflect any applicable tax withholding. Her agreement terminates
generally upon the later of her or her spouses death.
54
Miscellaneous
Ms. Davis also is entitled to receive certain benefits
payable to retired Wachovia employees generally, including
accrued vacation of which $2,838 was paid upon her termination.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The current members of the Compensation Committee are
Messrs. Brown, Browning, Ingram, McDonald, Proctor and
Dr. Shaw, none of whom is, or has been, an officer or
employee of Wachovia. See Other Matters Relating to
Executive Officers and Directors and Related Party Transactions
Policy.
Compensation
Discussion & Analysis
Executive
Summary
Wachovias board of directors approves and administers
Wachovias executive compensation plans, programs and
payments to our executive officers. The board of directors
utilizes the Compensation Committee to assist the board in
fulfilling the boards responsibilities in the area of
executive compensation.
The Compensation Committee, working with management and with its
independent, external consultant, has approved executive
compensation programs that are designed to attract, retain and
motivate executives in the best interests of Wachovia and its
stockholders. Wachovia and the Compensation Committee believe
executive performance is a distinguishing factor and a
competitive advantage of Wachovia and rewards executives whose
performance is outstanding.
Framework
of Wachovias Executive Compensation Program
Wachovias
Goals
Wachovias goal is to be the best, most trusted and admired
company in the financial services industry. To further that
goal, Wachovia has adopted strategic priorities, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Strengthening employee engagement;
|
|
|
|
Building customer loyalty;
|
|
|
|
Executing revenue growth strategies;
|
|
|
|
Improving cost structure and operating efficiencies;
|
|
|
|
Ensuring financial strength and strong corporate governance; and
|
|
|
|
Successfully integrating mergers and acquisitions.
|
In support of these strategic priorities, Wachovias
operating committee established goals focusing on achieving
earnings per share and revenue growth in the top quartile of the
top 20 financial institutions.
While these are not all of the goals and priorities Wachovia has
established, they represent the foundation of Wachovias
long-term objectives. Wachovias compensation policies,
practices and programs are intended to align executive
compensation within the framework of these strategic goals.
Compensation
Committee Responsibilities
Among other things, the Compensation Committee assists our board
of directors in fulfilling the boards responsibilities
regarding:
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation of our executive officers and other senior
officers, including oversight of our employee benefit and
executive incentive plans, policies, programs and practices;
|
|
|
|
Evaluating the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and
our other senior officers;
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluating and reviewing our management resources, including
succession planning and management development activities; and
|
|
|
|
Compensation of directors.
|
In furtherance of these objectives, the Compensation Committee
is responsible, among other things, for:
|
|
|
|
|
Approving our corporate compensation philosophy, including
overseeing and monitoring our executive officers
compensation policies, plans and programs to ensure they are
consistent with our compensation philosophy and the long-term
interests of our stockholders;
|
|
|
|
Annually reviewing and approving the corporate goals and
objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officers
compensation, and evaluating the CEOs performance in light
of these goals and objectives;
|
|
|
|
Determining and approving the CEOs compensation based on
the evaluation referenced in the previous bullet-point;
|
|
|
|
Annually reviewing and approving the compensation, including
incentive compensation, for our other executive officers;
|
|
|
|
Annually reviewing a tally sheet showing all
compensation and benefit programs in which each executive
participates as well as the cumulative value of these benefits;
|
|
|
|
Reviewing our policies regarding the tax deductibility of
compensation paid to our executive officers, including
establishing performance goals and certifying that performance
goals have been attained;
|
|
|
|
Approving and administering incentive compensation plans,
including stock-based plans, applicable to our executive
officers, with authority to grant any cash or stock awards, to
any executive officer;
|
|
|
|
Evaluating, reviewing and approving, as appropriate under the
facts and circumstances, employment agreements, change in
control agreements or severance agreements for any of our
executive officers;
|
|
|
|
At least annually, in consultation with the independent members
of the board and the CEO, reviewing succession planning and
management development activities and strategies regarding the
CEO and other members of senior management, and to assess our
overall management resources; and
|
|
|
|
At least annually reviewing and evaluating the compensation of
the board.
|
The Compensation Committee is composed of independent,
non-employee directors who are not eligible to participate in
management compensation programs. The Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee determined that
Compensation Committee members are independent as defined by
NYSE rules, applicable SEC rules and regulations and
Wachovias Director Independence Standards.
The Compensation Committee is assisted in performing its duties
by professionals in our Human Resources Division, outside
compensation consultants, legal counsel, and when appropriate,
senior management. The Compensation Committee reviews
Wachovias executive compensation programs at six regularly
scheduled meetings and one special meeting each year. A
consultant with Towers Perrin, a nationally recognized executive
compensation consulting firm, attended all six of the regularly
scheduled meetings in 2006 and reviewed Wachovias
executive compensation programs with the Compensation Committee.
Towers Perrin is independent from Wachovia. The Compensation
Committee engaged Towers Perrin, and the consulting firm reports
directly to the Compensation Committee. Towers Perrin, which was
paid $73,532 by Wachovia in 2006, does not have any significant
business relationships with Wachovia beyond the services
provided as the independent consultant to the Compensation
Committee. Other services provided to Wachovia by Towers Perrin
in 2006 included compensation survey data and related survey
subscriptions in which
56
Wachovia participates and which are used for compensation
benchmarking for other positions throughout Wachovia.
The Compensation Committee meets in executive session without
management for part of each scheduled meeting to ensure
impartiality. The current members of the Compensation Committee
are: Robert J. Brown, Peter C. Browning, Robert A. Ingram,
Mackey J. McDonald, Timothy D. Proctor and Ruth G. Shaw. None of
these individuals is, or has been, an officer or employee of
Wachovia.
The Compensation Committee analyzes objectively produced
competitive market data concerning executive compensation
programs to gauge Wachovias compensation practices against
those of the companies against which Wachovia competes
financially and for executive talent. The Compensation Committee
also relies upon advice from Wachovias CEO,
Mr. Thompson, our head of Human Resources and Corporate
Relations, and the director of Executive Compensation in
assessing, designing and recommending compensation programs,
plans and awards for executive officers other than the CEO.
Mr. Thompsons advice regarding the executive officers
that report directly to him is of importance to the Compensation
Committee in analyzing the subjective aspects of the performance
goals of those executive officers. No other Wachovia executive
officer provides information to the Compensation Committee for
its deliberations in establishing executive compensation for
executive officers. The Compensation Committee meets in
executive session, without the presence of management, including
the CEO, to determine the CEOs compensation.
Objectives
of Compensation Programs
The Compensation Committee has established guiding principles
for Wachovias compensation program that are intended to:
|
|
|
|
|
Align the interests of senior management with the interests of
Wachovias stockholders;
|
|
|
|
Attract and retain key talent needed to succeed in an intensely
competitive environment;
|
|
|
|
Motivate executives with competitive total compensation
opportunities based on the sustained performance of Wachovia and
each individual executives contributions to that
performance;
|
|
|
|
Emphasize performance-based compensation over fixed salary; and
|
|
|
|
Use long-term equity programs based on the performance of
Wachovias common stock to further align the interests of
senior management with our stockholders.
|
The senior management compensation program uses competitive peer
group information to assist in determining base salary, targeted
and maximum incentive cash compensation levels and stock award
guidelines. The Compensation Committee carefully considers this
information, the basis for differences in peer compensation
strategies and relevance to Wachovias markets and
strategies. The Compensation Committee also receives advice from
its independent, external consultant in determining
applicability of peer information. Wachovia targets compensation
for its senior management at the median of the peer market for
base salary, annual cash incentives and stock-based
compensation, with actual award values dependent upon
performance relative to strategic business objectives for the
annual cash incentive and stockholder value creation for
stock-based compensation. In making compensation decisions, the
Compensation Committee takes into consideration individual
performance, experience, skill and how critical the position is
to Wachovias success. The peer groups generally consist of
those comparable financial institutions that compete in the same
markets, and provide similar financial services and products.
The peer groups will change over time and will consist of other
major U.S. and global bank holding companies and other
selected competitors that will vary by business unit. The
Compensation Committee believes that the most direct competitors
for executive talent are not necessarily the same as those we
use to compare total stockholder value; therefore, peer groups
for compensation purposes will not directly correspond to the
broad list of institutions that make up the indices shown under
Performance Graph.
57
The following are those companies that the Compensation
Committee, in consultation with management and the independent
consultant to the Compensation Committee, identified as the
primary competitive market considered in analyzing market data
for 2006 executive compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of America Corporation
|
|
|
|
Citigroup Inc.
|
|
|
|
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
|
|
National City Corporation
|
|
|
|
SunTrust Banks, Inc.
|
|
|
|
U.S. Bancorp
|
|
|
|
Washington Mutual, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company
|
In evaluating the 2006 compensation benchmark for
Mr. Cummings (the head of the Corporate and Investment
Bank), the Compensation Committee expanded the competitive
market to include Credit Suisse First Boston, Deutsche Bank,
Lehman Brothers and UBS to better reflect the corporate and
investment banking market. In evaluating the 2006 compensation
benchmark for Mr. Carroll (the head of the Capital
Management Group), the Compensation Committee expanded the
competitive market to reflect a broader investment management
market, including Allianz Dresdner, Barclays, Columbia
Management, Deutsche Bank, Oppenheimer and State Street and a
broader retail securities brokerage market, including UBS, RBC
Dain Rauscher, Raymond James, Legg Mason and Piper Jaffray.
Compensation
Program
Compensation paid to our executive officers for 2006 performance
consisted primarily of salary, performance-based cash
incentives, awards of stock options and restricted stock, and
perquisites and benefits. The payment of cash incentives and
awards of stock options and restricted stock is directly related
to corporate and individual performance, as well as business
unit performance, where relevant. The Compensation Committee
deems the cash elements of executive compensation, salary and
annual cash incentive, to be short-term compensation and the
stock elementsstock options and restricted stock
awardsto be long-term compensation. The Compensation
Committee considers factors such as market practices of the peer
groups discussed above; corporate, business unit and individual
performance goals; retention; and share ownership requirements,
when determining the overall mixture in total executive
compensation, including short-term versus long-term compensation
and cash versus non-cash compensation.
The Compensation Committee makes its decisions regarding annual
cash incentive compensation at the same time as it makes
decisions regarding stock awards, which is a change in practice
from previous years when the stock award decisions were made
separately from the annual cash incentive award decisions. The
Compensation Committee determined that linking such
decision-making was a better practice for Wachovia because it
permits decision-making regarding individual elements of
compensation in the context of the annual performance review,
and implemented this practice in 2006. In addition, the
Compensation Committee reviews all components of executive
compensation, including retirement benefits, employment
agreement obligations and other programs, and knows what the
separate components will cost when making the stock award and
annual cash incentive award determinations.
The Compensation Committee reviewed 2006 compensation for the
Named Officers relative to the competitive market and relative
to results delivered on established objectives. The Compensation
Committee concluded that their compensation is consistent with
market practice based on company and individual performance.
58
In addition, Towers Perrin, the independent consultant retained
by the Compensation Committee, has reviewed compensation for the
Named Officers, and has affirmed the Compensation
Committees conclusion that the compensation is
market-competitive and well within competitive norms based on
results achieved.
Compensation
and Benefits
Base
Salary
The base salaries of senior managers are determined in
consideration of their positions scope of responsibilities
and their personal skills and experience. Other factors
considered are individual performance, the success of the
individuals business unit in achieving established profit
and business plans, the competitiveness of the executives
total compensation and Wachovias ability to pay an
appropriate and competitive salary. Members of senior management
are eligible for periodic increases in their base salary as a
result of individual performance or significant increases in
their duties and responsibilities. The amount and timing of an
increase depends upon the individuals performance,
position of salary relative to the competitive market median
salary, and the time interval and any added responsibilities
since the last salary increase. The Compensation Committee
annually reviews and approves any salary increases for executive
officers, including the CEO.
Base salary compensation is paid in cash twice monthly. Except
for changes in base salary due to performance, merit increases
or job change, base salary is fixed through the course of a
year. Senior executives may choose to defer a portion of their
base salary as part of Wachovias executive deferred
compensation program. Because base salary is fixed, the
Compensation Committee believes it should comprise a smaller
portion of total executive compensation, while a larger
component of total executive compensation is variable and based
upon performance.
Messrs. Carroll, Cummings, Jenkins and Wurtz have
employment agreements with Wachovia. These agreements
contractually bind Wachovia, among other things, from lowering
their base salaries to a level below what they were paid when
the executive first entered into the employment agreement.
During the term of the employment agreement, the annual base
salary for each executive must be reviewed in accordance with
Wachovias policies and procedures and may be increased
from time to time. If the base salary is increased, it cannot
later be reduced except with the written consent of the
executive. In the event Wachovia were to reduce the
executives base salary without consent, Wachovia may be in
breach of the employment agreement and the executive may be
entitled to terminate the employment agreement for good
reason. Because Mr. Thompson does not have an
employment agreement with Wachovia, he does not have a similar
right if his base salary were to be reduced. Because of
Wachovias contractual obligations to maintain base salary
and the rights of these executives to receive a certain level of
base salary, the Compensation Committee carefully considers base
salary increases prior to approval. Wachovias contractual
obligation with regard to base salary also is weighed against
the Compensation Committees preference for variable
compensation in making compensation decisions for executive
officers who have employment agreements with Wachovia.
Mr. Thompsons base salary was not changed from
$1,090,000 for 2006 based on the Compensation Committees
review of compensation levels for Chief Executive Officers among
the primary peer companies. Based on assessments of the
competitive market for the peer groups referenced above, base
salary levels were increased for 2006 for Messrs. Jenkins
and Cummings while no increase in base salary was provided for
Mr. Carroll, Mr. Malone, Mr. Kelly or Ms. Davis. In
approving Mr. Jenkins increase, the Compensation
Committee considered his appointment to Vice Chairman of
Wachovia in 2005. Upon his selection as Chief Financial Officer
in February 2006, Mr. Wurtz received an increase from his
prior base salary as Treasurer. Mr. Wurtzs base
salary increase reflects the increased responsibilities of his
new position and was established with the intention to move
Mr. Wurtzs compensation towards the median market
compensation benchmark for Chief Financial Officers among our
primary peer companies over several years as he fully
transitions into the role. The base salary for each of the Named
Officers is reflected in Summary Compensation Table.
59
The Compensation Committee approved an increase in
Mr. Carrolls base salary from $642,000 to $650,000
and an increase in Mr. Wurtzs base salary from
$425,000 to $500,000 effective January 1, 2007. The
Compensation Committee considered these increases in light of
competitive market data, changes in the overall compensation
targets for both of these executives and the mix of their total
compensation with respect to fixed and variable pay.
Annual
Cash Incentive
In addition to a fixed base salary, Wachovia provides executives
the opportunity to earn annual cash incentive compensation that
is variable, with funding based on performance relative to
established goals. The Compensation Committee intends for this
annual cash incentive opportunity to be a substantial component
of total executive compensation. Because the annual cash
incentive opportunity depends upon Wachovias and the
individual executives achievement of certain performance
measures, the Compensation Committee believes this form of
compensation greatly benefits Wachovias stockholders. The
Compensation Committee determines this compensation element at
the end of the fiscal year so that all relevant data are
available regarding the corporate and individual performance
measures, relying upon audited financial results.
Wachovia provides the annual cash incentive award opportunities
to our executive officers, including the CEO, under the covered
officer incentive component of the SIP. The maximum individual
award, including cash incentive and restricted stock awards,
under the SIP is limited to 0.5% of Wachovias adjusted net
income, which in 2006 is equal to $39.5 million. Funding
for the SIP annual cash incentive award component is based on an
assessment of Wachovias actual financial performance
relative to the Compensation Committees pre-established
financial performance goals:
|
|
|
|
|
If actual performance does not reach a certain threshold level
of goal performance, the SIP does not fund;
|
|
|
|
If actual performance reaches a threshold level, the SIP funds
at 50% of target;
|
|
|
|
If actual performance reaches the target level, the SIP funds at
100% of target; and
|
|
|
|
If actual performance reaches a superior level, the SIP funds at
200% of target.
|
For 2006, the Compensation Committee set financial performance
goals using a cash earnings per share (cash EPS)
goal of $4.83 and an economic profit (EP) goal of
$5.34 billion. The Compensation Committee believes tying
annual cash incentive awards to cash EPS and EP growth are
effective means of directly linking executive compensation to
stockholders interests. In order to calculate cash EPS
from Wachovias earnings per share prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting practices, merger-related and
restructuring charges and intangible amortization expense is
excluded. EP is a measure of the earnings in excess of the costs
of the capital used to support a transaction or business line.
In order to calculate EP from Wachovias income prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
certain adjustments are made to non-cash transactions, including
merger-related and restructuring charges and intangible
amortization expense, to calculate cash-based income net of a
risk-adjusted capital charge. The Compensation Committee has
discretion under the SIP to make adjustments to performance
goals to include or exclude the effect of extraordinary, unusual
or non-recurring items, gains or losses on the sale of Wachovia
assets, changes in tax or accounting rules, or the effect of
mergers or acquisitions. In 2006, the Compensation Committee
adjusted the performance results for annual cash incentive award
funding purposes to remove the unintended and uncontrollable
expense impact associated with the accelerated recognition of
stock option expense for retirement-eligible employees required
under SFAS 123R and the positive earnings and share impact
of the Golden West transaction to fourth quarter 2006 results.
The Compensation Committee determined that these uncontemplated
events were not considered in establishing performance
objectives for 2006 and that they should neither benefit nor
detrimentally affect incentive funding for 2006 performance. For
2006, Wachovias adjusted cash EPS results of $4.87
exceeded the cash EPS target and adjusted EP results of $5.355
billion exceeded the EP target. As a result, funding for the SIP
annual cash incentive award component was established slightly
above the target level.
60
Upon funding the SIP, determination of individual awards is
based primarily on financial performance, but also includes an
appropriate subjective assessment of individual performance.
With regard to executives reporting directly to the CEO, the
Compensation Committee considers the annual performance
evaluation of those executives conducted by the CEO as well as
the factors discussed below in determining base salary, annual
cash incentive awards and stock-based compensation payable to
such executives. Measures of individual performance include
meeting business unit objectives, customer service goals,
promoting corporate values and providing leadership to
employees. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers
Wachovias performance compared with the performance of
Wachovias peer group in determining the appropriate levels
of actual cash incentive awards. As indicated above,
Wachovias financial performance results were slightly
better than the Compensation Committees pre-established
performance goals. Upon also considering the subjective measures
of individual performance and Wachovias performance versus
its peers, the Compensation Committee approved the cash
incentive award payments to our executive officers, including
payments to the Named Officers that are set forth in
Summary Compensation Table.
Specifically, the Named Officers had the following
target cash incentive awards for 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
Thompson$5,000,000
|
|
|
|
Wurtz$1,600,000
|
|
|
|
Jenkins$2,800,000
|
|
|
|
Cummings$3,750,000
|
|
|
|
Carroll$2,750,000
|
In the case of Mr. Thompsons 2006 annual cash
incentive award, determined in February 2007 for 2006
performance, the Compensation Committee awarded
$5.15 million. This cash award is 103% of target, which is
consistent with the performance-based funding calculation for
2006. The Compensation Committee used discretion in accordance
with the SIP and approved a cash incentive award of
$3.45 million for Mr. Jenkins. This award is 123% of
target and reflects the significant 2006 contributions of
Mr. Jenkins and the General Bank. One of these
contributions was leading Wachovia to a 6th straight year of
being ranked No. 1 in the American Customer Satisfaction
Index and becoming the first major U.S. bank to earn a total
customer satisfaction score of 80. Additionally,
Mr. Jenkins led the successful integration of WestCorp and
strengthened Wachovias product mix and market presence
through the acquisition of Golden West. The Compensation
Committee also used discretion in accordance with the SIP and
approved a cash incentive award of $1.75 million for
Mr. Wurtz, which is 109% of target. In making this
determination, the Compensation Committee considered the strong
2006 gains in achieving Wachovias efficiency goals, as
well as Wachovias strong revenue and credit positioning in
a difficult interest rate environment. The Compensation
Committee also considered the position of Mr. Wurtzs
target compensation, which is less than the median market
compensation benchmark for Chief Financial Officers among our
primary peer companies. Messrs. Cummings and Carroll were
awarded annual cash incentive awards in accordance with the
performance-based funding calculation for 2006. The Compensation
Committee reviewed and discussed 2006 annual cash incentive
awards with its independent consultant before final
determinations were made.
Wachovias employment agreements with Messrs. Carroll,
Cummings, Jenkins and Wurtz do not guarantee the payment of any
specific annual cash incentive award, but indicate the
executives are eligible to receive a cash incentive award if the
Compensation Committee determines it is appropriate. If an
executive did not receive an annual cash incentive award, the
executive would not have the ability to terminate employment
with Wachovia for good reason under the applicable
employment agreement. The employment agreements contain this
provision because Wachovia did not want to be contractually
obligated to award any incentive payment to executives but to
provide the Compensation Committee with absolute discretion in
awarding any incentive compensation.
In the event an executive who has an employment agreement
terminates employment with Wachovia for good reason,
retirement, death or disability or is terminated by Wachovia
without cause, the executive will receive a payment equal to the
amount of the higher of (a) the executives
then-current target annual cash incentive award and
(b) the highest annual cash incentive award payment for the
previous three years,
61
prorated for the number of calendar days prior to the date of
termination. The employment agreements contain this provision to
compensate the executive for contributions made prior to
termination for reasons beyond the executives control. Due
to this provision, upon Ms. Davis termination of
employment in May 2006, she was paid a prorated cash incentive
award for 2006 of $661,918, based on the highest cash incentive
award she had earned in the preceding three years. Although
Mr. Kelly also had an employment agreement with Wachovia,
he did not receive a prorated cash incentive award for 2006
because he voluntarily terminated his employment with Wachovia
in February 2006 without good reason.
Mr. Malones employment agreement with SouthTrust,
which Wachovia assumed following the acquisition of SouthTrust
in November 2004, did not contain a similar provision and
therefore he did not receive a prorated cash incentive award for
2006.
Long-Term
Stock-Based Compensation
The Compensation Committee believes that common stock ownership
and stock-based compensation are the most effective means of
maintaining a strong link between management objectives and
stockholders long-term interests by focusing senior
management on the creation of long-term stockholder value. As a
result, a substantial portion of the total compensation for
Wachovias executive officers is in the form of stock
awards. Like the annual cash incentive award, stock-based awards
are variable compensation with the value that is ultimately
delivered tied to the value generated for stockholders through
stock appreciation and dividends. Stock options may expire
having no value at all and restricted stock awards may be
forfeited if certain performance measures are not met.
To reinforce the long-term perspective of stock-based
compensation and emphasize the relationship between stockholders
and senior management, Wachovias board implemented stock
ownership and share retention guidelines for senior management
and directors in 2002. This policy requires our executive
officers to own shares of common stock having a value equal to
five times base salary in the case of our CEO and Chairman, and
four times base salary for all other executive officers. All of
our Named Officers who are Wachovia employees satisfied this
ownership guideline in 2006. In addition, all of these
executives are required to retain ownership of at least 75% of
any common stock they acquire through our stock compensation
plans, after taxes and transaction costs. Each of our directors
must own common stock or common stock equivalents having a value
equal to at least five times the annual cash retainer, which is
currently $70,000. In 2005, Wachovia expanded our stock
ownership policy to the level of management that reports
directly to our executive officers, establishing a requirement
that they must own shares of common stock having a value equal
to two times base salary, and have three years to meet this
requirement. These ownership levels will be calculated annually
and executive officers and directors have three years to meet
the minimum level. Our board believes this stock ownership
policy substantially enhances stockholder value by materially
aligning managements interest with those of stockholders
over the term of their employment. This is an important element
of managements commitment to performance that benefits all
stockholders. Neither the board nor Wachovia management has
adopted any policies regarding hedging the economic risk of such
share ownership. However, Wachovia believes that no director or
executive officer has any such hedges in place with respect to
shares of Wachovia common stock they beneficially own. See also
Security Ownership of Management.
In considering stock awards, the Compensation Committee values
restricted stock awards using a 30-day average stock price,
which may differ from the closing stock price on the date of
grant, multiplied by the number of shares subject to the
restricted stock award. This value is substantially equivalent
to the value of restricted stock awards presented in
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table using
SFAS 123R, the value Wachovia records as restricted stock
expense in our financial statements prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. However, the values of
restricted stock awards presented in Summary Compensation
Table do not correspond with the values of restricted
stock awards considered by the Compensation Committee, because
that table requires a presentation of all restricted stock
expenses recognized by Wachovia in 2006, including prior
years restricted stock awards. The Compensation Committee
determines the economic value of stock options based
upon an assumed option value equal to 25% of a 30-day average
stock price. The economic values used by the Compensation
Committee in their
62
decision-making are different from the values of stock options
shown in Summary Compensation Table and Grants
of Plan-Based Awards Table. The values shown in these two
tables are presented according to SEC regulations using
SFAS 123R, the value Wachovia records as stock option
expense in our financial statements prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. For purposes of
valuing executive compensation awarded to our executive
officers, however, the Compensation Committee uses the economic
value determination, which it believes is a better indicator of
the potential value of the options granted because it takes into
consideration the full
10-year
option term as opposed to the expected life assumption used for
SFAS 123R valuation purposes. In comparison to the values
shown in Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table, the
economic values the Compensation Committee used in valuing stock
options for each Named Officer in February 2007 for 2006
performance were:
All stock options granted to Wachovia employees have an exercise
price equal to the closing stock price of Wachovia common stock
on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. It has
historically been Wachovias practice to value stock awards
on the date of grant; as such, Wachovia does not
back-date options. In 2006, stock awards were
approved during the Compensation Committees regularly
scheduled meeting in February to become effective on
March 31, 2006, and in 2007, stock awards were approved at
the Compensation Committees regularly scheduled meeting in
February. As discussed in the footnotes to Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table, the Compensation Committee
delayed the effective date of the 2006 grant date to
March 31, 2006 to facilitate the transition in linking
annual cash incentive and stock awards and to allow sufficient
time to ensure that measure date requirements in accordance with
SFAS 123R were met in the initial year of implementation. In
prior years, the annual stock grant occurred at the Compensation
Committees regularly scheduled meeting in April. As noted
in Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table, we present two
years of stock awards in that table. Due to changes in the
SECs executive compensation disclosure rules and the
Compensation Committees desire to grant stock awards
concurrently with annual cash incentive awards, the presentation
in that table aggregates two years of stock awards, rather than
not presenting the February 2007 awards as permitted by the
SECs regulations. In prior years, proxy statement
information reflected stock awards granted in the
applicable year while Wachovias current practice also
reflects stock awards earned for the applicable year.
Hence, although stock awards in February 2007 were granted in
2007, they represent compensation earned for 2006 performance
and the Compensation Committee believes this information is
important to stockholders to understand total executive
compensation for 2006. Pursuant to SFAS 123R, the stock
awards granted in February 2007 will be expensed in 2007 and
such expense will be presented in Wachovias proxy
statement for the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders.
The Compensation Committee determines which executives will
receive stock awards as well as the type, size and restrictions
on the awards. It is not the Compensation Committees
policy to make stock awards while Wachovia is in the possession
of material non-public information, thereby preventing the use
of spring-loaded options that gain value shortly
after the date of grant. The Compensation Committee also grants
stock awards for retention or new hire purposes at regularly
scheduled Compensation Committee meetings. The Compensation
Committee does not grant stock awards to executive officers,
including the Named Officers, more than once per fiscal year,
except in the case of newly hired executive officers or
employees promoted to executive officer status. The Compensation
Committee relies upon the advice of the CEO (only with respect
to executive officers who report to the CEO), Human Resources
management and its independent consultants recommendations
in making stock award determinations. However, the Compensation
Committee makes all final decisions regarding the grants of
stock awards to executive officers; it does not delegate
decision-making. While the Compensation Committee does not
delegate final
63
grant authority to any person, with respect to stock awards to
Wachovia employees who are not executive officers, the
Compensation Committee generally follows the recommendations of
the CEO. For stock awards granted at Compensation Committee
meetings other than the annual grant meeting, the CEO has been
delegated authority to select the employees to receive those
awards; however, the CEO does not have authority to make final
grants of stock awards.
The Compensation Committee determines actual stock awards for
executives based on the same financial and individual
performance review applicable in determining the annual cash
incentive award described above. For stock options granted to
Named Officers in March 2006 (for 2005 performance) and February
2007 (for 2006 performance), the Compensation Committee placed a
vesting restriction on such options so that they vest in equal
one-fifth installments over five years from the date of grant.
The stock options granted in 2006 and 2007 expire at the
tenth-year anniversary from the date of grant. Restricted stock
awarded to our executive officers in March 2006 was subject to
forfeiture unless Wachovia achieved a 20% return on tangible
equity. Return on tangible equity means Wachovias adjusted
net income as a percentage of average tangible common
stockholders equity, excluding adjustment for unrealized
gains or losses on debt and equity securities. Wachovia achieved
a 31.4% return on tangible equity in 2006, so the restricted
stock awards in 2006 will vest (i.e., the restrictions on
transfer will lapse) in equal annual increments over the
five-year period from the date of grant. Restricted stock
awarded to our executive officers in February 2007 is subject to
forfeiture unless Wachovia achieves a 20% return on tangible
equity in 2007. If the return on tangible equity threshold is
met for fiscal year 2007, these restricted stock awards will
vest in equal annual installments over the five-year period from
the date of grant. Pursuant to the terms of the SIP, in the
event of termination of employment due to death, disability,
retirement or a change in control of Wachovia, any
remaining vesting restrictions on restricted stock awards will
lapse and all unvested stock options shall become vested and
exercisable.
Wachovias employment agreements with Messrs. Carroll,
Cummings, Jenkins and Wurtz do not guarantee the grant of any
specific stock award. Those agreements each indicate the
applicable executive is eligible to participate in
Wachovias stock-based incentive compensation plans then
available to other peer executives of Wachovia with awards
thereunder determined by the Compensation Committee, in its sole
discretion. However, the employment agreements supersede
provisions in the SIP following a termination of employment by
the executive for good reason or termination of
Wachovia without cause. In such instance, during the three-year
compensation continuance period (two-year period in the case of
Mr. Wurtz), to the extent not otherwise vested in
accordance with Wachovias stock compensation plans, all
unvested stock options and restricted stock awards will continue
to vest in accordance with the applicable terms of such stock
option or restricted stock awards as if the executives
employment with Wachovia had not been terminated. At the end of
the compensation continuance period, to the extent not otherwise
vested in accordance with the preceding sentence, all unvested
stock options and restricted stock awards will vest. In
addition, the employment agreements also indicate that,
notwithstanding the termination of the executives
employment with Wachovia, all stock options granted to the
executive as of the date of the applicable employment agreement
and during the term of the employment agreement will be
exercisable until the scheduled expiration date of such stock
options.
In the case of Mr. Thompsons 2006 stock award,
granted in February 2007 for 2006 performance, the Compensation
Committee awarded $15.0 million in aggregate economic
value. This stock award is consistent with the target value
established by the Compensation Committee, based on review of
market median compensation levels among our peer group. As
previously noted, Wachovia slightly exceeded its performance
objectives for 2006. In determining Mr. Thompsons
stock award, the Compensation Committee also considered the
36.5% increase in Wachovias total stockholder return,
stock price plus dividends, the 39% increase in earnings per
share over the last three years and that Wachovias
performance on key financial measures exceeded those of peers
for the three-year period ending December 31, 2006. The
Compensation Committee decided to provide a greater portion of
this stock award in the form of restricted stock than in prior
years. By changing the mix of restricted stock and stock
options, the Compensation Committee intends to maintain a strong
ownership mentality among key employees at Wachovia and to
competitively position Wachovias compensation program in
the financial services industry. Accordingly,
64
80% of the aggregate stock award value was delivered in the
form of performance-contingent restricted stock awards and 20%
in the form of stock options for Mr. Thompson as well as
for the Named Officers currently employed at Wachovia. See also
CEO Compensation Summary below. Stock awards
for Messrs. Wurtz, Jenkins, Cummings and Carroll are
consistent with their respective 2006 performance year target.
The Compensation Committee established targets for each officer,
based on its review of median compensation among benchmark peer
companies. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed
2006 stock awards with its independent consultant before final
determinations were made and the awards were granted in February
2007.
Perquisites
As employees, our executive officers are eligible to participate
in employee benefit programs generally available to our
employees. In addition, we compensate our executive officers,
including our CEO, with certain personal benefits and
perquisites that are not generally available to our employee
population. The value of these benefits to the Named Officers is
set forth in Summary Compensation Table under the
column All Other Compensation and detail about each
element is set forth in footnote (5) to Summary
Compensation Table.
The Compensation Committee believes these benefits are aligned
with our desire to attract and retain superior management talent
for the benefit of all Wachovia stockholders. These benefits are
considered by the Compensation Committee as part of the overall
executive compensation package or to protect the interests of
stockholders. The Compensation Committee annually reviews the
personal benefits and perquisites available to executive
officers and determines whether these programs continue to serve
the purposes for which they were intended. The Compensation
Committee has discontinued some programs that they determined no
longer serve a valid purpose. For example, the Compensation
Committee eliminated a supplemental retirement program in 2000,
a split-dollar life insurance program in 2003, expense
allowances in 2005 and reimbursement of expenses associated with
joining and maintaining social club memberships in 2005.
In some instances, Wachovia reimburses employees for the payment
of income taxes. Any such reimbursements in 2006 are set forth
in Summary Compensation Table. These reimbursements
have been provided in accordance with excise tax
gross-up
provisions in employment agreements in change in control
scenarios to protect the executive from unintended tax
consequences where employment is terminated following a change
in control. Excise tax
gross-ups
were provided in 2006 to Mr. Malone in accordance with his
SouthTrust employment agreement, which Wachovia assumed in the
SouthTrust merger. In addition, $9,080 in tax
gross-up
payments were made to Mr. Thompson in 2006 to offset the
impact of imputed income associated with personal use of
corporate aircraft. This amount has been reported in
Summary Compensation Table and, as noted in
footnote (5)(d) of Summary Compensation Table,
the board has required Wachovias chief executive officer
to use company aircraft for all travel whenever practicable for
security reasons. The Compensation Committee has determined it
is appropriate to make these tax
gross-up
payments so Mr. Thompson does not incur personal expense in
order to comply with the boards mandated security policy.
Wachovias employment agreements with Messrs. Carroll,
Cummings, Jenkins and Wurtz each specify the applicable
executive is entitled to fringe benefits and perquisite plans or
programs of Wachovia generally available to peer executives;
provided that Wachovia reserves the right to modify, change or
terminate such fringe benefits and perquisite plans or programs
from time to time, in its sole discretion.
Deferred
Compensation Programs
Wachovia maintains several deferred compensation programs for
employees who have annual compensation generally over
$220,000 per year. Currently, approximately
1,200 employees participate in Wachovias deferred
compensation programs, including the Named Officers. Deferred
compensation programs are offered to employees as an optional
benefit for such employees to defer receipt of a portion of the
salary and/or annual incentive compensation they have earned
into investment accounts to be paid
65
to the employee in later years. Primarily, deferred compensation
programs are intended to promote current and future personal
savings and defer taxes on such compensation (and earnings on
the deferred balances) until later years. The Compensation
Committee believes Wachovias deferred compensation
programs benefit Wachovia and its stockholders by promoting
employee retention. Because these deferred compensation
contributions are unsecured obligations of Wachovia, executives
have their personal wealth at risk and, as a result, an
incentive to make decisions that are in the best long-term
interest of stockholders.
Wachovias deferred compensation programs are not qualified
under the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974,
or ERISA. Participants in the plans make investment
elections for their deferrals from a group of investment options
similar to those available to participants in Wachovias
401(k) savings plan, excluding an investment option in Wachovia
common stock. The deferral account balances increase or decrease
in value based on the performance of the investments selected by
the participants. Participants in these plans may choose to
receive account balances in a lump sum or in ten annual
installments upon termination of employment due to death,
disability or retirement, except in the event of a change
in control of Wachovia where the successor or acquiring
corporation does not choose to continue such plans. In this
case, such balances are to be paid in a lump sum. A nonqualified
retirement trust has been established to fund certain
nonqualified benefit plans, including Wachovias deferred
compensation plans. Prior to a change in control of
Wachovia, benefits are paid from the trust only upon our
direction. Upon the occurrence of a change in
control, we are required to contribute to the trust an
amount sufficient to pay the benefits required to be paid under
such plans as of the date on which the change in
control occurs.
Participation in the deferred compensation plans is voluntary.
Information about the Named Officers participation in
Wachovias deferred compensation plans is set forth in
Summary Compensation Table and Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Table.
Wachovia became obligated to fulfill the contractual deferred
compensation arrangements SouthTrust maintained following the
November 2004 SouthTrust acquisition. During his employment with
SouthTrust and Wachovia, Mr. Malone participated in
deferred compensation benefit plans pursuant to which he elected
to defer receipt of compensation previously earned and reported
in SouthTrusts proxy statements during the applicable
period. Under the Wallace D. Malone, Jr. Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Plan and Agreement, SouthTrust granted him
restricted stock units in 1998 that became payable in shares of
Wachovia common stock in January 2007. See footnote (8) to
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table.
See also Pension Benefits Table and
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.
CEO
Compensation Summary
Wachovia believes changes this year to the disclosure and
reporting requirements for executive compensation make it
difficult for stockholders to determine how an executives
compensation has changed from prior years as we transition to
the new rules. One such change is the requirement to report
equity compensation as it was expensed for the year rather than
based upon the economic values of stock awards for that
years performance that, as described earlier, the
Compensation Committee uses as the basis for granting such
awards. This change was particularly impactful for 2006 as the
Summary Compensation Table must include the
SFAS 123R expense for a portion of stock awards reported in
prior years. See footnote (2) to Summary Compensation
Table.
66
Consistent with Wachovias commitment to clear and
transparent disclosure, the Compensation Committee believes it
is important for Wachovia to provide stockholders with a
historical perspective and a brief explanation of changes with
respect to the CEOs compensation. The table below provides
the value of annual compensation the Compensation Committee
determined to award to the CEO for base salary, annual cash
incentive and stock awards for the performance years
2004-2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stock
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Base Salary ($)
|
|
|
Annual Incentive ($)
|
|
|
Restricted Stock ($)
|
|
|
Stock Options ($)
|
|
|
Award ($)
|
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1,090,000
|
|
|
|
5,150,000
|
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
15,000,000
|
|
|
|
21,240,000
|
|
2005
|
|
|
1,090,000
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,300,000
|
|
|
|
7,700,000
|
|
|
|
14,000,000
|
|
|
|
20,090,000
|
|
2004
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
5,850,000
|
|
|
|
7,150,000
|
|
|
|
13,000,000
|
|
|
|
21,000,000
|
|
Stock award values differ from such values in Summary
Compensation Table, Grants of Plan-Based Awards
Table and in prior Wachovia proxy statements. The
valuation differences are primarily the result of different
methodologies the Compensation Committee uses in assigning the
economic value of stock awards versus those required for proxy
statement reporting purposes and SFAS 123R. For example,
when the Compensation Committee converts the economic value of a
stock award into a fixed number of shares for the applicable
stock award, it uses a
30-day
average stock price that typically differs from the actual
grant-date price used for proxy statement reporting purposes and
SFAS 123R. Similarly, when the Compensation Committee converts
the economic value of stock options to a fixed number of stock
options to grant, the options are assumed to have a value equal
to 25% of the
30-day
average stock price (33% for the 2004 award above); however, for
proxy statement reporting purposes and SFAS 123R, the
Black-Scholes pricing model is used and typically results in a
different option valuation. See Grants of Plan-Based
Awards Table, including footnotes (9) and (10), for
additional valuation information about the 2005 and 2006 awards.
The stock awards for 2004 referenced above were valued in
Wachovias 2006 proxy statement (and reported as
compensation in 2005) as follows: restricted
stock $5,698,482; stock options
$4,816,936; and total stock award $10,515,418.
In 2004, Wachovia significantly exceeded its performance goals
and had performance in the top quartile relative to peers.
Mr. Thompson received an annual cash incentive award of
$7 million based on this performance.
Mr. Thompsons stock award value of $13 million
was delivered in the form of stock options (55%) and restricted
stock (45%) in April 2005 and reflected that Wachovias
performance relative to peers for the
3-year
period ending December 31, 2004 was in the top quartile. In
2005, Wachovias performance was slightly below its
performance goal and performance relative to peers was at about
the median. Mr. Thompsons cash incentive award for
2005 was $5 million. His stock award value of
$14 million was also delivered in the form of stock options
(55%) and restricted stock (45%) in March 2006 and reflected
that Wachovias performance relative to peers over a
3-year
period ending December 31, 2005 was in the top quartile. In
2006, Wachovia exceeded its performance goals but its stock
appreciation relative to peers was slightly below the median.
However, Wachovias performance on key financial measures
continued to exceed those of peers for the
3-year
period ending December 31, 2006. Mr. Thompson received
a stock award value of $15 million delivered in the form of
stock options (20%) and restricted stock (80%) in February 2007.
All restricted stock awards during this period were made subject
to forfeiture unless Wachovia achieves return on tangible equity
of 20% or better in the year of grant. See Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table for detail on these stock awards,
including performance criteria for vesting.
As the table shows, the Compensation Committees valuation
of Mr. Thompsons aggregate performance compensation
for 2006 performance is about 6% higher than for 2005 and 1%
higher than for 2004. During this
3-year
period, Wachovias total stockholder return (stock price
plus dividends) has increased by 36.5% and earnings per share
have increased by over 39%.
67
Post-Termination
Compensation and Benefits
Employment
Agreements
The Compensation Committee believes that employment agreements
between Wachovia and each of Wachovias executive officers
is an important component of attracting and retaining executive
talent for Wachovia. Wachovia adopted the practice of entering
into employment agreements with each executive officer in 1999.
When this policy was first adopted, the Compensation Committee
considered the importance of retaining the senior-most
leadership in Wachovia (known as First Union at the time),
including the CEO, as the company undertook a major corporate
restructuring. The Compensation Committee considered the
importance of continuity of leadership to be a compelling reason
for entering into the employment agreements at the time.
Following the First Union-Wachovia merger in 2001, the
Compensation Committee authorized Wachovia to enter into new
employment agreements with the executive officers of the newly
combined organization, excluding Mr. Thompson, who retained
his 1999 employment agreement. The rationale for entering into
new employment agreements in 2001 (which superseded any existing
legacy First Union or legacy Wachovia employment agreement for
such executives) evolved from preservation of executive
leadership during a difficult corporate restructuring to
preservation and continuity of executive leadership to ensure
the success of the First Union-Wachovia merger. The Compensation
Committee believes that those employment agreements aided in
retaining key executives and contributed to the success of the
First Union-Wachovia merger.
The employment agreements generally provide for payments to the
executive following a termination of employment with Wachovia by
the executive for good reason or a termination of
employment by Wachovia without cause. The employment
agreements do not provide for such payments solely because of a
change in control of Wachovia; an additional
triggering event must occur following the change in control in
order for such payments. The triggering events constituting
good reason and cause were selected as
providing protection to Wachovia and to the executive for
unwarranted terminations of employment that could cause harm to
Wachovia and/or the business units managed by the executive. See
also Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-Control Employment Agreements.
The employment agreements also provide that Wachovia will pay
the executive a
gross-up
payment equal to the amount of excise taxes (plus the applicable
federal and state income, FICA and excise taxes due on such
gross-up
payment) payable by the executive if employment is terminated in
conjunction with a change in control of Wachovia and
such taxes become payable, as a result of payments under the
agreement or otherwise, and are deemed to be excess
parachute payments for federal tax purposes. In addition,
the employment agreements contain restrictive covenants for
Wachovias benefit following such terminations of
employment. The employment agreements prohibit the executive
from competing with Wachovia following employment termination in
certain circumstances; from soliciting Wachovia employees and
customers; and from divulging confidential information obtained
while employed with Wachovia. These provisions are intended to
protect Wachovia from the executive competing against Wachovia
during the compensation continuance period and to protect
confidential or proprietary Wachovia information.
Among others, Messrs. Jenkins, Carroll, Cummings and Kelly
and Ms. Davis entered into employment agreements with
Wachovia in 2001 following the merger (Mr. Thompson at the
time remained bound by the 1999 employment agreement). Under the
terms of these agreements, they may not be amended or terminated
without the executives prior written consent.
Ms. Davis had an employment agreement with legacy Wachovia
that would have enabled her to terminate employment with
Wachovia following the merger for good reason as her
job responsibilities following the merger changed. In order to
persuade her to stay with Wachovia, Wachovia agreed to provide
her in her new employment agreement with three opportunities
during which she could terminate employment with Wachovia for
any or no reason and receive the employment agreement benefits
as if she had terminated for good reason, as she had
the right to do following the First Union-Wachovia merger. The
Compensation Committee believed this provision was in
Wachovias best interests as it would enable Wachovia to
retain her valuable services during the merger integration. In
addition to the critical merger integration between First Union
and Wachovia, Ms. Davis also oversaw the successful
integrations of SouthTrust and Prudential Financials
retail brokerage
68
business with Wachovias computer systems. It was pursuant
to the termination provision discussed above that Ms. Davis
retired from Wachovia in May 2006. Her payments following her
termination are detailed in Summary Compensation
Table and in Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-ControlMs. Davis.
Mr. Kelly terminated employment with Wachovia in February
2006 to become the chief executive officer of another financial
services company. Because Mr. Kelly ended his employment
voluntarily, his employment agreement provided that he receive
only his base salary through the date of termination, his
deferred compensation amounts, and other benefits to which any
terminating employee of Wachovia would be entitled. These
payments are detailed in Summary Compensation Table.
In December 2005, at his request, Mr. Thompson and Wachovia
terminated his employment agreement from 1999. In authorizing
this termination, the Compensation Committee considered the
effects on Wachovia of terminating the employment agreement,
specifically the covenants in the employment agreement
preventing Mr. Thompson from competing with Wachovia, and
the risks to Wachovia if Mr. Thompson were to terminate
employment without these restrictive covenants.
SouthTrust entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Malone in 1984, which Wachovia became obligated to
fulfill following the Wachovia-SouthTrust merger in 2004. The
Compensation Committee and Wachovias board of directors
were aware of his employment agreement when the board approved
the SouthTrust merger. In addition, Wachovias stockholders
voted to approve the SouthTrust merger and the joint proxy
statement-prospectus for the Wachovia stockholders meeting
contained details about his employment agreement. He terminated
employment with Wachovia in January 2006 and received the
payments pursuant to his 1984 employment agreement as detailed
in Summary Compensation Table and in Potential
Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-ControlMr. Malone.
At Wachovias 2006 annual stockholders meeting,
stockholders approved a non-binding stockholder proposal that
urged Wachovias board of directors to seek stockholder
approval of future severance agreements with senior executives
that provide benefits in an amount exceeding 2.99 times the sum
of the executives base salary plus incentive award.
Following approval of this stockholder proposal, Wachovias
board of directors adopted Wachovias Severance Policy
implementing the stockholder proposal. A copy of that policy is
available at Wachovias website, www.wachovia.com
under the tab About WachoviaInvestor Relations
and then under the heading Corporate
GovernanceSeverance Policy.
Consistent with the policy of having employment agreements with
Wachovias executive officers, the Compensation Committee
authorized, and Wachovia entered into, an employment agreement
with Mr. Wurtz following his promotion to Chief Financial
Officer in 2006. The Compensation Committee believes that
executive retention and continuity remains very important to
Wachovia following the acquisition of Golden West Financial
Corporation in 2006. The Compensation Committee authorized
Wachovia to enter into the new employment agreement with
Mr. Wurtz because the Compensation Committee believes he
will play a meaningful and important part of Wachovias
success on behalf of all stockholders in the future.
Mr. Wurtzs employment agreement differs from the
employment agreements entered into by Wachovia in 2001 because
it is subject to Wachovias Severance Policy adopted by
Wachovias board and referenced in the preceding paragraph.
For additional information on the differences between
Mr. Wurtzs agreement and the other applicable Named
Officers employment agreements, refer to the
Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-ControlEmployment Agreements.
Severance
Wachovia maintains a severance plan on behalf of all employees
who meet certain eligibility criteria. Wachovias executive
officers that have employment agreements are not eligible to
also receive severance under Wachovias severance plan if
the executive officers employment with Wachovia is
terminated. Because Mr. Thompson does not have an
employment agreement with Wachovia, if his employment with
Wachovia were to cease, he may be eligible to receive payments
under Wachovias severance plan available to Wachovia
employees generally. In such event, Wachovias severance
plan would entitle Mr. Thompson, based on his years of
service, to receive 16 months of base salary.
69
Retirement
Payments
The Compensation Committee and Wachovia management strongly
believe it is important to provide a post-retirement benefit to
employees who reach retirement age. Wachovias retirement
benefits program, available to all employees generally, consists
of several components, including Wachovia maintaining an
ERISA-qualified pension plan, an ERISA-qualified 401(k) savings
plan, a retiree medical portion of Wachovias
ERISA-qualified health insurance plan, and Wachovias
participation in the federal Social Security program. In
addition, for certain Wachovia employees, Wachovia maintains a
savings restoration plan, which supplements Wachovias
401(k) savings plan by matching contributions of plan
participants that exceed the federal limit of income for
participation in the 401(k) plan (i.e., a
participants income in excess of the federal limit may be
deferred into the savings restoration plan and this contribution
is matched by Wachovia up to 6% of base salary).
Following termination of the legacy First Union supplemental
retirement program in 2000, the Compensation Committees
policy is not to maintain supplemental retirement plans for our
executive officers, although as discussed below, Wachovia has
maintained a supplemental pension benefit for certain other
employees. As a result, Wachovia has not entered into
supplemental retirement agreements with our executive officers,
including the Named Officers. However, certain companies that
Wachovia has acquired did maintain supplemental retirement
arrangements with executives prior to the acquisition.
Mr. Malone and SouthTrust entered into certain supplemental
retirement benefit programs that Wachovia assumed in connection
with the Wachovia-SouthTrust merger in November 2004, and
payments to him following his retirement are described in
Pension Benefits Table. These supplemental
retirement benefit programs were previously described in the
joint proxy statement-prospectus for the Wachovia-SouthTrust
merger.
Ms. Davis entered into her SERA with legacy Wachovia in
1999. Wachovia became obligated to fulfill that agreement
following the First Union-Wachovia merger in September 2001.
Upon Ms. Davis retirement, she became entitled to receive
retirement benefits as a result of this agreement, which are
also detailed in Summary Compensation Table,
Pension Benefits Table and in Potential
Payments Upon Termination or
Change-in-ControlMs. Davis. The legacy Wachovia
supplemental retirement agreements were previously described in
the aggregate for all legacy Wachovia executive officers in the
joint proxy statement-prospectus for the First Union-legacy
Wachovia merger.
Mr. Wurtz has participated in the First Union Benefit
Restoration Plan since 2000, before he became an executive
officer, that provides pension benefits for base salary above
the limit allowable for qualified pension plans.
Accounting
and Regulatory Considerations of Executive
Compensation
Wachovia adopted the fair value method of accounting under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 in
2002, which provided for expensing the value of stock options in
Wachovias financial statements prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. As a result of
adopting this, and the mandatory adoption of SFAS 123R in
2005, the Compensation Committee decided to lengthen the stock
option vesting schedule for stock option grants. Historically,
Wachovia stock options typically vested over a 1- to
3-year
period; stock option grants in March 2006 and February 2007 each
vest over a
5-year
period. Lengthening the time of stock option vesting reduces the
annual stock option expense for Wachovia as well as promotes
retention of executives who are granted stock awards.
Interpretations of SFAS 123R require the immediate
expensing of stock options granted to retirement-eligible
participants because the SIP provides that unvested stock
options automatically vest upon the option-holders
retirement. This required expense was not expected and factored
into the Compensation Committees determinations regarding
performance goals for 2006 (see Annual Cash
Incentive above). As a result of these interpretations,
restricted stock award and stock option information presented in
Summary Compensation Table for retirement-eligible
executives reflects the full SFAS 123R expense for restricted
stock awards and stock options granted in 2006 as well as a
portion of the SFAS 123 expense associated with restricted stock
awards and stock options granted in prior years.
70
In April 2003, our stockholders approved the SIP (and approved
amendments to that plan in August 2006), which was designed to
allow Wachovia to deduct cash incentive and restricted stock
awards made to the CEO and other covered officers.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code establishes a
$1,000,000 limit on tax-deductible compensation paid to these
officers to the extent this compensation is not
performance-related. The Compensation Committees intention
has been to modify our executive compensation plans to minimize
the possibility of lost deductions wherever feasible. Under the
SIP, awards may be made in the form of cash and restricted
stock. These awards will be deductible as long as they are
linked to achieving financial performance targets and payments
do not exceed 0.5% of Wachovias adjusted net income, or
$39.5 million for 2006. No awards to any Wachovia executive
officer for 2006 were in excess of such amount. Wachovia
believes that all 2006 annual cash incentive awards and
restricted stock awards to executive officers, including the
Named Officers, are deductible for tax purposes.
Conclusion
Wachovias board believes Wachovia achieved substantially
all of its financial and strategic goals described earlier in
2006, and therefore, Wachovias executive compensation
program and total payments for 2006 performance appropriately
reward Wachovias executive officers for 2006 performance
and provide incentive to them for future performance. As a
result, the Compensation Committee and Wachovia believe the
amounts paid to our executive officers, including the Named
Officers, for 2006 performance are reasonable and appropriate.
Compensation
Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with
Wachovia management the Compensation Discussion &
Analysis presented in this proxy statement. Based on that
review and discussion with Wachovia management, the Compensation
Committee recommended to the Wachovia board of directors that
the Compensation Discussion & Analysis be included in
Wachovias 2006 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(as incorporated by reference to this proxy statement).
Ruth G. Shaw,
Chair
Robert J. Brown
Peter C. Browning
Robert A. Ingram
Mackey J. McDonald
Timothy D. Proctor
71
Performance
Graph
The following graph compares (i) the yearly change in the
cumulative total stockholder return on Wachovia common stock
with (ii) the cumulative return of the Standard &
Poors 500 Stock Index (S&P 500), and the
Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. Bank Stock Index
(BKX). The graph assumes that the value of an
investment in Wachovia common stock and in each index was $100
on December 31, 2001, and that all dividends were
reinvested. The performance shown in the graph represents past
performance and should not be considered an indication of future
performance.
The S&P 500 and the BKX are market-capitalization-weighted
indices, meaning that companies with a higher market value count
for more in the indices. The BKX includes the 24 bank holding
companies with the largest market capitalizations in the U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
Wachovia
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
119.52
|
|
|
|
157.56
|
|
|
|
184.03
|
|
|
|
191.93
|
|
|
|
214.98
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
77.90
|
|
|
|
100.24
|
|
|
|
111.15
|
|
|
|
116.61
|
|
|
|
135.02
|
|
BKX
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
89.33
|
|
|
|
120.08
|
|
|
|
132.41
|
|
|
|
136.62
|
|
|
|
159.87
|
|
Other
Matters Relating to Executive Officers and Directors and Related
Party Transactions Policy
Our executive officers and directors (including their immediate
family members and organizations with which they are affiliated)
are customers of ours and, in some cases, have lending
relationships with Wachovias banking subsidiaries. In
managements opinion, the lending relationships with these
directors and officers were made in the ordinary course of
business and on substantially the same terms, including interest
rates, collateral and repayment terms, as those prevailing at
the time for comparable transactions with other customers not
related to Wachovia and do not involve more than normal
collection risk or present other unfavorable features. In
addition to these lending relationships, some directors and
their affiliated organizations provide services or otherwise do
business with Wachovia and its affiliated entities, and we in
turn provide services, including retail brokerage, investment
banking and other financial services, or otherwise do business
with the directors and their organizations, in each case in the
ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms
as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with
other nonaffiliated persons. See Corporate Governance
Policies and PracticesDirector Independence. During
2006, Wachovia engaged in transactions in the ordinary course of
business with Barclays Bank plc and certain of its affiliated
entities. Barclays Bank plc is the ultimate parent company of
Barclays Global Investors, NA, which together with affiliated
entities, beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding
shares of Wachovia common stock as of December 31, 2006.
See Security Ownership of
72
Certain Beneficial Owners. Such transactions were on
substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with unrelated third parties and such
transactions were effected prior to Wachovias adoption of
the related party transactions policy described below.
Wachovias Code of Conduct & Ethics and the
boards Corporate Governance Guidelines provide guidance
for addressing actual or potential conflicts of interests
matters, including those that may arise from transactions and
relationships between Wachovia and its executive officers or
directors. In order to provide further clarity and guidance on
these matters, the board recently adopted a written policy
regarding the review, approval or ratification of related party
transactions, including those described above and under
Corporate Governance Policies and PracticesDirector
Independence. The policy generally provides that the
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee will review
and approve in advance, or will ratify, all related party
transactions between Wachovia and Wachovias directors,
executive officers, and persons known by Wachovia to own more
than 5% of Wachovias common stock, and any of their
immediate family members. Related party transactions include
transactions or relationships involving Wachovia and amounts in
excess of $120,000 and in which the above related parties have a
direct or indirect material interest. Under the policy, the
failure to approve a related party transaction in advance would
not invalidate the transaction or violate the policy as long as
it is submitted to the Corporate Governance &
Nominating Committee for review and ratification as promptly as
practicable after entering into the transaction.
Wachovia has various procedures in place to identify potential
related party transactions, and the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee works with management
and Wachovias Legal Division in reviewing and considering
whether any identified transactions or relationships are covered
by the policy. Under the policy, some ordinary course
transactions or relationships are not required to be reviewed,
approved or ratified by the Corporate Governance &
Nominating Committee, including transactions or relationships
where the related party serves solely as a non-management
director or trustee and ordinary course customer relationships
such as the banking and lending relationships described above.
Wachovia has other policies and procedures in place to ensure
compliance with applicable bank regulatory requirements
regarding those banking and lending relationships. In
determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction or
relationship that is covered by the policy, the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee considers, among
other things,
|
|
|
|
|
the identity of the parties involved in the transaction or
relationship;
|
|
|
|
the business purpose and rationale of the transaction or
relationship;
|
|
|
|
the terms of the transaction, including whether those terms are
fair to Wachovia and are substantially comparable with the terms
of transactions or relationships with nonaffiliated persons;
|
|
|
|
whether the transaction or relationship would impair the
directors independence; and
|
|
|
|
the extent that the transaction or relationship would present an
improper conflict of interest, taking into account the size of
the transaction, the overall financial position of the related
party, the nature of the related partys interest and the
significance of the transaction or relationship to Wachovia.
|
A copy of the policy is available on Wachovias website at
www.wachovia.com under the tab About
WachoviaInvestor Relations and then under the
heading Corporate GovernanceRelated Party
Transactions Policy.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act requires the directors
and executive officers subject to that Section to file reports
with the SEC and the NYSE relating to their ownership of
Wachovia common stock and Dividend Equalization Preferred shares
and any changes in that ownership. To our knowledge, based
solely on a review of copies of the reports that we received and
written representations from the individuals required to file
the reports, during the year ended December 31, 2006, all
Section 16(a) reports applicable to
73
directors and executive officers were filed on a timely basis,
except as set forth in prior proxy statements and except for a
late filing by: Ernest S. Rady, a director, relating to the
exercise of 16,999 stock options in December 2006. In the
situation noted above, the failure to file a timely report was
inadvertent and promptly corrected after discovery of the
reporting obligation.
|
|
PROPOSAL 2.
|
PROPOSAL TO
AMEND WACHOVIAS ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO
ELIMINATE THE PROVISIONS CLASSIFYING THE TERMS OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
|
The North Carolina Business Corporation Act provides that,
unless specified in a corporations articles of
incorporation or bylaws, directors serve one-year terms between
annual meetings of stockholders. Wachovias articles of
incorporation currently provide that Wachovias board of
directors will be divided into three classes, each class to be
as nearly equal in number as possible to each other class, with
directors in each class serving staggered three-year terms. At
each annual meeting of stockholders, only one class of directors
are chosen by the stockholders for a term of three years to
succeed those directors whose term expires at that meeting. The
articles of incorporation also provide, as permitted by North
Carolina law, that the affirmative vote of not less than 80% of
the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote in the
election of directors, voting together as a single class, is
required to amend or repeal our classified board.
As previously referenced in Proposal 1, our board, with the
assistance of the Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committee, has conducted an evaluation of whether
Wachovias classified board structure continues to be in
the best interests of Wachovia and its stockholders. In
conducting its evaluation, the board considered that the general
purposes of the classified board are to promote stability and
continuity in leadership on the board and provide the board with
a greater opportunity to protect the interests of stockholders
from abusive takeover tactics in the event of an unsolicited
takeover offer. The board also considered that some corporate
governance experts and institutional stockholders believe that a
classified board reduces accountability to stockholders because
it prevents stockholders from evaluating all directors on an
annual basis. In addition, the board recognized that the annual
election of directors continues to evolve as a best
practice in corporate governance. After a careful review,
the board has determined that it would be in the best interests
of Wachovia and its stockholders to take steps to eliminate the
classified board.
Attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement is
Section 7 of our articles of incorporation as we propose to
amend it. Appendix B is incorporated herein by
reference and stockholders are encouraged to read
Appendix B in its entirety.
If this proposal is adopted, Wachovia would amend our articles
of incorporation as provided in Appendix B to
eliminate the provisions requiring a classified board of
directors. By removing these provisions, the term of directors
will be governed by North Carolina law, which as mentioned above
provides for one-year terms. If adopted at the meeting, Wachovia
directors would stand for election annually, beginning at
Wachovias 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. Under North
Carolina law, all directors, including those directors elected
at this 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, would continue to
serve the remainder of their terms. However, the terms of
Class I directors expire at the 2008 annual meeting of
stockholders, and in order to facilitate the immediate
transition from classified terms to annual terms, the directors
in classes II and III are expected to tender their
resignations and be reappointed by the board prior to the 2008
annual meeting of stockholders, so that all directors will be
elected for a one-year term at that meeting. If Proposal 2
is approved by stockholders, the board will adopt conforming
amendments to Wachovias bylaws regarding declassifying the
board.
Approval of Proposal 2 to amend our articles of
incorporation to declassify the board requires the affirmative
vote of at least 80% of the outstanding shares of Wachovia
common stock entitled to vote at the meeting. If this proposal
does not receive the required number of votes in favor,
Wachovias articles of incorporation will not be amended
and our directors will continue to serve three-year terms as our
articles of incorporation currently provide.
74
If approved, this amendment will become effective upon the
filing of articles of amendment to Wachovias articles of
incorporation with the Secretary of State of North Carolina.
Wachovia would make this filing promptly after approval of the
proposal at the meeting.
Wachovias board of directors have determined that the
proposal to amend our articles of incorporation to eliminate the
provisions classifying the terms of our board is in
Wachovias and our stockholders best interests.
Accordingly, Wachovias board has approved this amendment
and recommends that Wachovia stockholders approve this amendment
by voting FOR this proposal.
The board recommends that stockholders vote FOR
this proposal. Approval of this proposal requires the
affirmative vote of 80% of the shares entitled to vote at the
meeting. Abstentions and votes not cast will have the same
effect as votes against this proposal. Therefore, your vote is
important and we urge you to vote FOR this
proposal.
|
|
PROPOSAL 3.
|
PROPOSAL TO
AMEND WACHOVIAS ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO PROVIDE
FOR MAJORITY VOTING IN UNCONTESTED DIRECTOR ELECTIONS
|
The board of directors recommends that stockholders approve an
amendment to Wachovias articles of incorporation to
provide for majority voting in uncontested director elections.
The North Carolina Business Corporation Act provides that,
unless specified otherwise in a companys articles of
incorporation, a director is elected by a plurality of the votes
cast. Wachovias articles of incorporation do not specify
any voting standard required in director elections and,
therefore, Wachovias directors are elected by plurality
vote. Plurality voting means that the nominees
receiving the largest number of affirmative votes cast are
elected directors up to the maximum number of directors to be
elected, regardless of the number of withheld votes
or whether affirmative votes constitute a majority of the votes
cast.
In February 2006, our board of directors amended its Corporate
Governance Guidelines to provide for a policy regarding majority
voting in the election of directors. The policy provides that in
an uncontested election (i.e., an election where the only
nominees are those proposed by the board), a nominee for
director who receives a greater number of votes
withheld for his or her election than votes
for his or her election must promptly tender his or
her resignation to the Corporate Governance &
Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance &
Nominating Committee will consider the resignation and recommend
to the board whether to accept or reject it. The board, with the
recommendation of the Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committee, then must accept or reject the resignation within
90 days following the stockholders meeting and must
explain its decision in a publicly available SEC filing.
At the time of adopting the director resignation policy, the
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee and the
board recognized that the majority vote standard was an evolving
concept. The Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committee and the board have continued to monitor best practices
in this area, and recently many public companies have amended
their charter or bylaws to provide for majority voting rather
than the current plurality standard. The board, with the
assistance of the Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committee, has engaged in a further evaluation of the majority
vote standard and, after careful consideration, believes it is
in the best interests of Wachovia and its stockholders to
enhance Wachovias majority vote standard by amending
Wachovias articles of incorporation to provide for
majority voting in uncontested director elections.
Our board, based on the recommendation of the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee, proposes to amend
Wachovias articles of incorporation to provide that a
nominee for director in an uncontested election will be elected
to the board of directors if the votes cast for such
nominees election exceed the votes cast against such
nominees election. The amendment provides that an
uncontested election is where (i) no stockholder has
submitted to Wachovias secretary a notice of an intent to
nominate a candidate for election at a stockholders
meeting in accordance with the advance notice procedures
described in Wachovias bylaws or (ii) if a notice has
been submitted, it has been withdrawn in writing on or before
the tenth day preceding the date that Wachovia first mails its
notice of the stockholders meeting. In all director
elections other than uncontested elections, directors will be
elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the
stockholders meeting.
75
Under North Carolina law, if an incumbent director is not
re-elected at an annual meeting of stockholders, then, even
though his or her term has expired, the incumbent director
continues to serve in office as a holdover director
until his or her successor is elected or until there is a
decrease in the number of directors. North Carolina law further
provides that if the stockholders fail to elect the full
authorized number of directors, the board of directors may fill
the vacancy by electing a successor. In addition,
Wachovias articles of incorporation authorize the board to
reduce the size of the board to no fewer than nine directors.
Accordingly, to address holdover situations the amendment to
Wachovias articles of incorporation also provides that if
a director fails to receive the required majority vote, the
board may decrease the number of directors, fill any vacancy, or
take other appropriate action.
If Proposal 3 is approved, the board is expected to amend
its Corporate Governance Guidelines to modify its existing
director resignation policy in order to make it consistent with
North Carolina law. Directors would no longer be required to
tender their resignation if they fail to receive the required
majority vote since the board can unilaterally address a
holdover situation. Rather, the revised provision would provide
that in the event an incumbent director fails to receive the
required majority vote for election, the board of directors may
decrease the number of directors, fill any vacancy, or take
other appropriate action, taking into account the recommendation
of the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee. The
board would act on the Corporate Governance &
Nominating Committees recommendation within 90 days
following the date of the stockholders meeting at which
the election occurred, and would promptly disclose its decision
in a
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC. In addition, the provision would provide
that to the extent practicable and as permitted by North
Carolina law, any director who fails to receive the required
majority vote would not participate in the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committees recommendation
or the boards consideration of the matter. If stockholders
approve Proposal 3, the board also will approve conforming
amendments to Wachovias bylaws regarding the election of
directors.
Approval of Proposal 3 to amend our articles of
incorporation to provide for majority voting in uncontested
director elections requires the affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast on Proposal 3 at the meeting. If the
proposed amendment is approved, a new paragraph 12 will be
added to Wachovias articles of incorporation, as described
in the attached Appendix C to this proxy statement.
Appendix C is incorporated herein by reference and
stockholders are encouraged to read Appendix C in
its entirety.
If approved, this amendment will become effective upon the
filing of articles of amendment to Wachovias articles of
incorporation with the Secretary of State of North Carolina.
Wachovia would make this filing promptly after approval of the
proposal at the meeting. The new majority vote standard would
then be applicable to the election of directors at the 2008
annual meeting of stockholders.
Wachovias board of directors has determined that the
proposal to amend our articles of incorporation to provide for
majority voting in uncontested director elections is in
Wachovias and our stockholders best interests.
Accordingly, Wachovias board has approved this amendment
and recommends that Wachovia stockholders approve this amendment
by voting FOR this proposal.
The board recommends that stockholders vote FOR
this proposal. Approval of this proposal requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on
Proposal 3 at the meeting. Proxies, unless indicated to the
contrary, will be voted FOR this proposal.
|
|
PROPOSAL 4.
|
PROPOSAL TO
RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS
|
The Audit Committee of the board has appointed KPMG LLP as
Wachovias auditors for the year 2007 and, in accordance
with established policy, that appointment is being submitted to
stockholders for ratification. In the event the appointment is
not ratified by a majority of votes cast, in person or by proxy,
it is anticipated that no change in auditors would be made for
the current year because of the difficulty and expense of making
any change so long after the beginning of the current year, but
that vote would be considered in connection with the
auditors appointment for 2008.
KPMG LLP were our auditors for the year ended December 31,
2006, and a representative of the firm is expected to attend the
meeting, respond to appropriate questions and, if the
representative desires, which is not now anticipated, make a
statement.
76
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees for
professional services provided by KPMG LLP to Wachovia for the
calendar years 2006 and 2005.
FEES PAID
TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Audit Fees (1)
|
|
$
|
21,260,660
|
|
|
|
17,123,875
|
|
Audit-Related Fees (2)
|
|
|
7,034,986
|
|
|
|
6,660,637
|
|
Tax Fees (3)
|
|
|
3,680,131
|
|
|
|
4,429,903
|
|
All Other Fees (4)
|
|
|
19,747
|
|
|
|
555,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
31,995,524
|
|
|
|
28,769,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These are fees paid for professional services rendered for the
audit of Wachovias annual consolidated financial
statements and internal controls, for the reviews of the
consolidated financial statements included in Wachovias
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
and for services normally provided in connection with statutory
or regulatory filings or engagements. |
|
(2) |
|
These are fees paid for assurance and related services that were
reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of
our consolidated financial statements and that are not reported
under Audit Fees above, including fees relating to
audits of financial statements of employee benefit plans and
certain subsidiaries, internal control reports, and internal
control related services. |
|
(3) |
|
These are fees paid for professional services rendered for tax
compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. For 2006 and 2005, tax
fees included tax compliance fees of approximately
$3.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
These are fees paid for permissible work performed by KPMG LLP
that does not meet the above categories, consisting of risk
management services, merger integration assistance, forensic
services and business process reviews. |
Audit
Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit
Services
Our Audit Committee pre-approves all audit, audit-related and
non-audit services provided by our independent auditors, KPMG
LLP, prior to the engagement of KPMG LLP with respect to those
services. Generally, prior to or at the beginning of each year,
Wachovias management submits to the Audit Committee
detailed information regarding the specific audit, audit-related
and permissible non-audit services with respect to which it
recommends the Audit Committee engage the independent auditors
to provide for the fiscal year. Management discusses the
services with the Audit Committee, including the rationale for
using our independent auditors for non-audit services, including
tax services, and whether the provision of those non-audit
services by KPMG LLP is compatible with maintaining the
auditors independence. Thereafter, any additional audit,
audit-related or non-audit services that arise and that were not
submitted to the Audit Committee for pre-approval at the
beginning of the year are also similarly submitted to the Audit
Committee for pre-approval. The Audit Committee has delegated to
the Chair of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve
the engagement of the independent auditors when the entire Audit
Committee is unable to do so. All such pre-approvals are then
reported to the entire Audit Committee at its next meeting.
In the Matter of KPMG LLP Certain Auditor Independence
Issues. As Wachovia has disclosed in our 2006
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
the Securities and Exchange Commission has requested Wachovia to
produce certain information concerning any agreements or
understandings by which Wachovia referred clients to KPMG LLP
during the period January 1, 1997 to November 2003 in
connection with an inquiry regarding the independence of KPMG
LLP as Wachovias outside auditors during such period.
Wachovia is continuing to cooperate with the SEC in its inquiry,
which is being conducted pursuant to a formal order of
investigation entered by the SEC on October 21, 2003.
Wachovia believes the SECs inquiry relates to certain tax
services offered to Wachovia customers by KPMG LLP during the
period from 1997 to early 2002 and whether these activities
might have caused KPMG LLP not to be independent
from Wachovia, as defined by applicable accounting and SEC
regulations requiring auditors of an SEC-reporting company
77
to be independent of the company. Wachovia
and/or KPMG
LLP received fees in connection with a small number of personal
financial consulting transactions related to these services.
KPMG LLP has confirmed to Wachovia that during all periods
covered by the SECs inquiry, including the present, KPMG
LLP was and is independent from Wachovia under
applicable accounting and SEC regulations. The Audit Committee
carefully considered all available relevant information about
this matter, including during its discussions regarding the
auditors independence described in Audit Committee
Report, when making its determination to appoint KPMG LLP
as our auditors for 2007.
See also Proposal 1Audit Committee Report.
The board recommends that stockholders vote FOR
this proposal. Proxies, unless indicated to the contrary, will
be voted FOR this proposal.
|
|
PROPOSAL 5.
|
A
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING NON-BINDING STOCKHOLDER VOTE
RATIFYING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Pension Plan, of 1625 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20036, an
owner of 12,403 shares of Wachovia common stock, has
advised Wachovia that it intends to present the following
proposal and supporting statement at the meeting. In accordance
with applicable proxy regulations, the proposal and supporting
statement, that are presented as received by Wachovia and for
which Wachovia and our board accept no responsibility, are set
forth below.
RESOLVED, that stockholders of Wachovia Corporation
(Wachovia) urge the board of directors to adopt a
policy that Wachovia stockholders be given the opportunity at
each annual meeting of stockholders to vote on an advisory
resolution, to be proposed by Companys management, to
ratify the compensation of the named executive officers
(NEOs) set forth in the proxy statements
Summary Compensation Table (the SCT) and the
accompanying narrative disclosure of material factors provided
to understand the SCT (but not the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis). The proposal submitted to shareholders should make
clear that the vote is non-binding and would not affect any
compensation paid or awarded to any NEO.
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
In our view, senior executive compensation at Wachovia has not
always been structured in ways that best serve
stockholders interests. For example, in 2005 Chairman and
CEO G. Kennedy Thompson received $17,321 for taxes associated
with personal use of company aircraft. And non-retired Vice
Chairman Wallace Malone received total compensation calculated
at $12,397,855 for 2005.
We believe that existing U.S. corporate governance
arrangements, including SEC rules and stock exchange listing
standards, do not provide stockholders with enough mechanisms
for providing input to boards on senior executive compensation.
In contrast to U.S. practices, in the United Kingdom,
public companies allow stockholders to cast an advisory vote on
the directors remuneration report, which
discloses executive compensation. Such a vote isnt
binding, but gives stockholders a clear voice that could help
shape senior executive compensation.
Currently U.S. stock exchange listing standards require
stockholder approval of equity-based compensation plans; those
plans, however, set general parameters and accord the
compensation committee substantial discretion in making awards
and establishing performance thresholds for a particular year.
Stockholders do not have any mechanism for providing ongoing
feedback on the application of those general standards to
individual pay packages. (See Lucian Bebchuk &
Jesse Fried, Pay Without Performance 49 (2004))
Similarly, performance criteria submitted for stockholder
approval to allow a company to deduct compensation in excess of
$1 million are broad and do not constrain compensation
committees in setting performance targets for particular senior
executives. Withholding votes from compensation committee
members who are standing for reelection is a blunt and
insufficient instrument for registering
78
dissatisfaction with the way in which the committee has
administered compensation plans and policies in the previous
year.
Accordingly, we urge Wachovias board to allow stockholders
to express their opinion about senior executive compensation at
Wachovia by establishing an annual referendum process. The
results of such a vote would, we think, provide Wachovia with
useful information about whether stockholders view the
companys senior executive compensation, as reported each
year, to be in stockholders best interests.
We urge stockholders to vote for this proposal.
Position
of the Board
Wachovias board recommends that stockholders vote
AGAINST the proposal set forth above for the
following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Wachovia already has a more direct, effective process in
place for stockholders to communicate with our board of
directors;
|
|
|
|
The proposal would create more confusion than clarity, to the
detriment of Wachovia stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
Wachovia already has a very deliberate, thoughtful process
for determining executive compensation.
|
The board believes strongly in Wachovia stockholders having the
mechanisms to provide input to the board. In contrast to the
proponents assertion that Wachovia stockholders do not
have enough mechanisms for providing input to our board on
executive compensation, Wachovia stockholders already have the
ability to directly contact any or all of our board members. As
set forth above under Corporate Governance Policies and
Practices Communications with Directors,
Wachovia stockholders may contact any director at: Board of
Directors (or lead independent director or name of individual
director); c/o Corporate Secretary; Wachovia Corporation;
301 South College Street; Charlotte, North Carolina
28288-0013.
The board believes this is the most effective means for Wachovia
stockholders to provide input to it on any subject of interest
to stockholders, including executive compensation. The board
believes that the proposal represents a less effective method of
influencing the board because it is an inefficient manner of
expressing support or criticism of executive compensation. The
board believes direct communications are more effective and
accurate because it allows stockholders to voice specific
observations or objections directly to the decision-makers
before decisions are made, as opposed to voting on the results
of those decisions. The board believes that the advisory vote in
the proposal will not provide the Compensation Committee with
meaningful insight into specific stockholder concerns that it
could address when considering Wachovias compensation
program. Direct communications are the most effective, most
accurate voice Wachovia stockholders have in expressing concerns
with our board and eliminate the need for the board and the
Compensation Committee to attempt to interpret the results of
the proposals referendum.
Rather than simplify communications with the board, the board
believes that the proposal would create confusion as to how the
board, the Compensation Committee, and Wachovia interpret the
results of the non-binding referendum. The lack of clarity as to
the meaning of the vote results would eliminate any benefits the
proposal seeks to employ. Stockholders vote for or
against matters for many different reasons and the
board and the Compensation Committee would be left attempting to
interpret the results under the proposed referendum. For
example, if stockholders vote in favor of the executive
compensation, the Compensation Committee is not able to
determine if the vote signifies approval of Wachovias
overall practices or if the vote merely signifies approval of a
particular individuals compensation or a particular
component of the total compensation. Conversely, if stockholders
voted against the executive compensation, the Compensation
Committee does not have clarity with what aspect of executive
compensation stockholders did not agree. Instead of encouraging
stockholders to take advantage of Wachovias current direct
communication policy, the proposal advocates substituting a
narrower, more confusing and less effective mechanism.
79
To Wachovias knowledge, none of our peers and competitors
would be similarly bound by a referendum on compensation. The
board believes this would make it more difficult for Wachovia to
attract and retain senior management. In our industry, human
capital is our most important asset, and we believe that
adoption of the proposal could lead to a perception among senior
executives and top producers that compensation opportunities at
Wachovia may be limited or negatively affected by the advisory
vote when compared with opportunities at our competitors. In
addition, if implemented, our boards decisions regarding
executive compensation would be subject to second guessing and
this may impair Wachovias ability to attract and retain
individuals willing to serve as a director of Wachovia, to the
detriment of our stockholders.
As outlined in Compensation Discussion &
Analysis, the Compensation Committee has a very deliberate
and thoughtful process for setting compensation targets and
determining awards for Wachovias executives. That process
occurs at all Compensation Committee meetings that take place
throughout the year. As outlined in this proxy statement,
executive compensation determinations are a complex and
demanding process and Wachovias board exercises great care
and discipline in its analysis and decision-making. The
Compensation Committee has directly engaged an independent,
executive compensation expert whose firm has no other
significant business relationship with Wachovia. The advice of
this expert is used in establishing peer groups, compensation
targets and determining awards. The board believes that the
Compensation Committee and it advisors are much better informed
as to competitive practices in the industry, Wachovias
relative financial performance position and the appropriate
compensation for this performance than would be possible through
an unstructured, undefined referendum. Establishing executive
compensation involves balancing numerous business considerations
against competitive pressures and is an undertaking for which
the board and the Compensation Committee are uniquely suited and
should maintain responsibility. The results of the non-binding
referendum in the proposal could have a chilling effect on the
Compensation Committees deliberations because the
Compensation Committee would not have any specificity from the
results of the referendum as to what part of Wachovias
executive compensation program produced the voting results. As a
result, the proposal may place undue pressure on the
Compensation Committee to compensate Wachovia executives below
competitive levels that would cause great harm to Wachovia
stockholders and circumvent the purposes of Wachovias
executive compensation program as discussed in
Compensation Discussion & Analysis. The
Compensation Committee is charged with exercising its fiduciary
duties to set compensation that is in the best interests of
Wachovias stockholders and this responsibility should not
be subject to stockholder vote after the fact.
WACHOVIAS BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE
AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES, UNLESS INDICATED TO
THE CONTRARY, WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THIS
PROPOSAL.
|
|
PROPOSAL 6.
|
A
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTOR
NOMINEES
|
Hilda Kaplis and Sydney Kaplis Kay, of 5718 Harvest Hill Road,
Dallas, Texas
75230-1253,
owners of 317 shares of Wachovia common stock, have advised
Wachovia that they intend to present the following proposal and
supporting statement at the meeting. In accordance with
applicable proxy regulations, the proposal that is presented as
received by Wachovia and for which Wachovia and our board
accepts no responsibility, is set forth below.
Qualifications
for Director Nominees
WHEREAS MOST of the corporate Boards in the United States are
currently made up of present or past Chairmen/CEOs/Presidents
having considerable executive background experiences in a wide
varieties of businesses.
WHEREAS MOST of the Director Nominees come from businesses
totally different from that of the company to which they have
been nominated to serve on its independent executive governance
Board.
WHEREAS It is known, throughout the financial industry, that
Director Nominees are often appointed by Chairmen/CEOs with the
power and influence to create their own Boards. John Kenneth
Galbraith, the
80
renown economist, said, Senior Executives in the great
corporations of this country set their own salaries...and stock
option deals...subject to the approval of the Board of Directors
that they have appointed. Not surprisingly, the Directors go
along. (The Dallas Morning News, 1-16-2000, p.
1/10J)
WHEREAS Sir J.E.E. Dalberg said, Power tends to corrupt
and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
WHEREAS Such Directors have been called Puppets by
the author of this Proposal; Flunkies by David
Broder of The Washington Post, and
Rubber-stampers by Steve Hamm of BusinessWeek
magazine.
WHEREAS Currently, ALL the non-employee Directors, COMBINED,
often do not own enough shares in the corporation to which they
have been nominated to have genuine feelings of fiduciary
responsibility to its shareholders. Their allegiance tends to be
directed toward the Chairmen-CEOs who nominated them, revealed
in the enormously distorted Compensation Packages given to the
Principal Executives that are totally unrelated to Performance
year after year after year.
WHEREAS To have a truly independent executive governance Board,
the Nominees must come from sources over which the Chairmen-CEO,
and other Principal Executives in the corporation, have no
control.
WHEREAS NO salaried employees shall qualify as a Director
Nominee: their presence on the Board corrupts and destroys its
function as a totally independent executive governance body.
THEREFORE, it is recommended and requested that, beginning with
the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders, all Director Nominees
must be:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Individual Investors who shall, for the past five
(5) years, have been, and currently are, the sole owner of
at least five million DOLLARS ($5,000,000) of the
corporations shares, and/or
|
|
|
2.
|
Representatives from Mutual, Pension, State Treasury Funds or
Foundations that hold at least two million (2,000,000) SHARES in
the corporation to which they are being nominated..
|
Position
of the Board
Wachovias board recommends that stockholders vote
AGAINST the proposal set forth above for the
following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committees present process for identifying qualified
individuals to serve as director already ensures that
Wachovias board consists of experienced and independent
directors and, therefore, the proposals stock ownership
and other qualification requirements are unnecessary;
|
|
|
|
Wachovias board believes that the proposal, if adopted,
would be harmful to Wachovia and its stockholders because its
requirements would immediately disqualify substantially all of
the boards existing directors from serving as a director
in the future and would unnecessarily limit the available pool
of qualified director candidates for Wachovia;
|
|
|
|
The boards existing stock ownership policy for
directors is a more flexible way of ensuring that director and
stockholder interests are aligned.
|
The board strongly believes that it would not be in the best
interests of Wachovia and its stockholders to adopt this
proposal. The board believes that its present nominating process
already ensures that experienced, dedicated, and independent
directors serve on Wachovias board and that the arbitrary
stock ownership and other qualification requirements for
director nominees that would be mandated by the proposal are
unnecessary and would be harmful to stockholders.
As described under Corporate Governance Policies and
Practices Director Nomination Process, the
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, which
consists solely of independent directors, has developed a
process for identifying, and recommending to the board,
individuals qualified to become Wachovia directors. In
evaluating current members of the board and new candidates, the
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee considers
the needs of the entire board and Wachovia in light of the
current mix of director skills and attributes, and considers a
variety of issues and factors in assessing the
81
qualifications of individual director nominees, including the
individuals business experience and background, financial
expertise, reputation, diversity, and knowledge and experience
in matters impacting financial institutions such as Wachovia.
The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee also
considers the boards policies outlined in the boards
Corporate Governance Guidelines, including those relating to the
ability of directors to devote time to board and committee
matters and the boards belief that a substantial majority
of the board should consist of independent directors. Wachovia
believes that its nominating process has resulted in a strong
board that is highly experienced, dedicated and well equipped to
serve Wachovia and its stockholders. The board also has strong
independent leadership, as evidenced by the existence of a lead
independent director and 89% of the members of the board being
considered independent directors as determined in accordance
with NYSE rules and the boards independence standards. The
board, therefore, strongly disagrees with the proposals
suggestion that its board can only be independent and effective
if all director nominees satisfy the stock ownership and other
requirements specified in the proposal, and believes that the
proposal is unnecessary.
In addition to being unnecessary, the board believes that the
proposal, if implemented, would be harmful to Wachovia and its
stockholders. For example, if adopted, the proposals stock
ownership requirements would disqualify for nomination in 2008
as many as 16 of Wachovias 19 existing directors,
including 16 of its outside, independent directors. As a result,
there would be an immediate and extreme turnover in the
membership of the board that would be detrimental to Wachovia
and its stockholders. Wachovia is a complex, diversified
financial services company and its stockholders clearly benefit
from having a solid core of active, knowledgeable and
experienced directors. The implementation of the proposal would
result in a board with a significant number of new directors
unfamiliar with, and inexperienced in, Wachovias
operations and its long-term strategy. Moreover, the strict
stock ownership and other requirements would significantly and
unnecessarily limit the available pool of qualified director
candidates for Wachovia. In addition to disqualifying existing
Wachovia directors, it is very likely that the proposals
arbitrary stock ownership requirements would disqualify many
future candidates for director who would have superior
qualifications, but would not satisfy the proposals
requirements. Wachovia and its stockholders, therefore, would be
denied the services of talented individuals, some of whom may
end up serving as directors for other financial services
companies. There also would be no guarantee that Wachovia would
be able to identify either individual investors satisfying the
stock ownership requirements or representatives from the
specific groups identified in the proposal who would be both
qualified to serve as a director of the fourth largest banking
company in the United States and willing to serve as a director.
Accordingly, the board believes that limiting the Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committees and the
boards ability to consider qualified director nominees by
imposing arbitrary stock ownership requirements would be harmful
to stockholders and is not justified, especially given the
current strength of the board and its present nominating process.
The board, however, recognizes the importance of aligning the
boards interests with those of stockholders. The board has
already adopted a common stock ownership policy for members of
the board, which requires that directors own common stock or
common stock equivalents having a value equal to at least five
times the annual cash retainer, which is currently $70,000.
Under the policy, the directors have three years from first
becoming a director to meet the minimum requirements. The board
believes that its stock ownership policy is a more appropriate
method of aligning board and stockholder interests because it
allows new directors to meet requirements over time rather than
automatically barring otherwise qualified directors from serving
as directors.
WACHOVIAS BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE
AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES, UNLESS INDICATED TO
THE CONTRARY, WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THIS
PROPOSAL.
|
|
PROPOSAL 7.
|
A
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING REPORTING POLITICAL
CONTRIBUTIONS
|
The AFL-CIO Reserve Fund, 815 Sixteenth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20006, an owner of 1,067 shares of
Wachovia common stock, has advised Wachovia that it intends to
present the following proposal and supporting statement at the
meeting. In accordance with applicable proxy regulations, the
proposal and
82
supporting statement, that are presented as received by Wachovia
and for which Wachovia and our board accept no responsibility,
are set forth below.
Shareholder
Proposal
Resolved, that the shareholders of Wachovia
(Wachovia or the Company) hereby request
that the Company provide a report, updated semi-annually,
disclosing the Companys:
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Policies and procedures for political contributions (both direct
and indirect) made with corporate funds.
|
|
|
2.
|
Monetary and non-monetary contributions to political candidates,
political parties, political committees and other political
entities organized and operating under 26 USC Sec. 527 of
the Internal Revenue Code including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a.
|
An accounting of the Companys funds contributed to any of
the organizations described above;
|
|
|
|
|
b.
|
Identification of the person or persons in the Company who
participated in making the decisions to contribute;
|
|
|
|
|
c.
|
The internal guidelines or policies, if any, governing the
Companys political contributions.
|
This report shall be presented to the Board of Directors
Audit Committee or other relevant oversight committee, and
posted on the Companys website.
Supporting
Statement
As long-term shareholders of Wachovia, we support policies that
apply transparency and accountability to corporate political
giving. Absent a system of accountability, we believe that
corporate executives will be free to use the Companys
assets for political objectives that are not in the interests of
the Company and its shareholders. We are concerned that there is
currently no single source of information that provides all of
the information sought by this resolution.
Working Americans do business with our Company as depositors and
brokerage clients. They invest their retirement savings through
Wachovia and own shares in the Company itself. We believe these
relationships are based on the expectation of trust in Wachovia.
In our view, this trust is imperiled by Wachovias partisan
role in the national debate on Social Security that affects the
retirement security of our Companys depositors and
investors.
Our Company has been a member of the Alliance for Worker
Retirement Security (AWRS), which is in our opinion
the main business-backed lobby group for privatization of Social
Security. Wachovia is one of only two known financial services
firms remaining in AWRS (Charlotte Observer, 2/7/05), and
as the groups director pointed out, there is no reason to
belong to AWRS except to support privatization
(St. Louis Post Dispatch, 2/9/05).
We believe that Wachovias support for these groups creates
a serious potential conflict of interest between the
Companys own interest in profits from managing privatized
Social Security accounts and the interests of its clients in
preserving Social Security in its current form. For this reason,
we believe that complete political contributions disclosure by
the Company is necessary for the Board and its shareholders to
be able to fully evaluate the political use of corporate
assets.
Position
of the Board
Wachovias board recommends that stockholders vote
AGAINST the proposal set forth above for the
following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Federal and state election laws already require extensive
disclosure;
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
Wachovias policy is that it does not use corporate
funds to make contributions to political candidates, political
parties or committees, or political entities organized under
Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code; and
|
|
|
|
If adopted, the proposal would serve no useful purpose, be
overly burdensome and result in unnecessary expense for Wachovia
stockholders.
|
The board believes that it is not necessary to adopt this
proposal. Federal and state laws already require extensive
disclosure of political contributions, and Wachovia complies
with all applicable laws and regulations regarding political
contributions and disclosure. In addition, Wachovias
policy is not to use corporate funds to make contributions to
the political candidates and entities described in the proposal,
and information regarding Wachovias policies on political
contributions is located at Wachovias website. The board
believes that any additional disclosures or reports prepared by
Wachovia relating to its political contributions and activities
would result in unnecessary duplication and expense for Wachovia
and its stockholders.
As a large financial services company involved in many different
businesses, including consumer and commercial lending,
securities brokerage, asset and wealth management and insurance,
Wachovia is subject to significant federal, state and local
regulation. Wachovia recognizes that these regulations can have
a profound impact on the way we operate our business, deliver
value to our stockholders, support our employees and serve our
customers and communities. To increase the likelihood that our
views on legislative and regulatory developments affecting
Wachovia and its constituencies are included in the legislative
process, the board believes that it is in the best interests of
Wachovia and its stockholders that Wachovia be an active
participant in the electoral process.
Wachovias policy, however, is that it does not use
corporate funds to make contributions to political candidates,
political parties or committees, or political entities organized
under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code. Instead,
Wachovias political activities consist primarily of
Wachovias sponsorship of political action committees,
known as PACs, which solicit and accept voluntary contributions
from eligible employees and make political contributions to
federal, state and local candidates and candidate committees
that promote responsible government and support effective
financial legislation important to Wachovia and its
stockholders. Decisions regarding political contributions by the
PACs are subject to the oversight of the board of trustees for
each PAC based upon advancing the best interests of Wachovia and
its stockholders and the recommendations made voluntarily by
contributing Wachovia employees. Any Wachovia employee who
contributes to a PAC may request a PAC contribution for a
candidate
and/or
candidate committee. As required by law, all PAC contributions
are reported on a periodic basis to the Federal Election
Commission and to the appropriate state election authorities.
Reports made to those agencies are a matter of public record. In
addition, Wachovias PACs and political contributions made
by the PACs are subject to annual internal audits.
The proposals reporting requirements are unnecessary given
Wachovias political contributions policy described above
and on its website. The board also believes that the legally
required disclosures currently being made by our PACs and the
recipients of political contributions from the PACs, as well as
Wachovias internal oversight process and policies and
procedures, are more than adequate and that any additional
disclosure would serve no useful purpose, would be burdensome,
and would result in an unnecessary duplication and expense for
Wachovias stockholders.
WACHOVIAS BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE
AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES, UNLESS INDICATED TO
THE CONTRARY, WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THIS
PROPOSAL.
|
|
PROPOSAL 8.
|
A
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SEPARATING THE OFFICES OF
CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|
Mr. Richard A. Dee, of 115 East 89th Street, New York,
New York 10128, an owner of 200 shares of Wachovia common
stock, has advised Wachovia that he intends to present the
following proposal and supporting statement at the meeting. In
accordance with applicable proxy regulations, the proposal and
84
supporting statement, that are presented as received by Wachovia
and for which Wachovia and our board accept no responsibility,
are set forth below.
Stockholders hereby request that the Board of Directors
of Wachovia Corporation adopt promptly a resolution requiring
that it have a Chairman who serves in that capacity only, and
has no management duties, titles or responsibilities.
What conflicts of interest can be more damaging to the
interests of stockholders than those that occur when overseers
are allowed to oversee and to supervise themselves?
At Enron, WorldCom, Tyco, and other legends of
mismanagement and corruption, the Chairmen also served as
CEOs. Their dual roles helped those individuals to achieve
virtually total control of the companies.
I believe that far too many of Corporate Americas
problems stem from the efforts of title and power-hungry senior
executives to concentrate power in themselves. Such amassing of
power is a somewhat recent phenomenon in the history of
publicly-owned companies, but certainly not a recent phenomenon
in the history of nations. Such concentrations of power rarely
have proven to be in the best interests of stockholders or
citizenries.
When a top operating officer is allowed to serve also as
its Chairman, or the position is abolished, a crucial link in a
proven successful chain of command and responsibility is
eliminatedand the owners of a company, its outside
stockholders, are deprived of both a vital protection against
conflicts of interest and a clear and direct channel of
communication to the company.
Allowing senior executives, such as CEOs and
Presidents, to be appointed directors of publicly-owned
companies employing them is, in itself, a fairly recent turn of
events. Their presence at board meetings was long considered
inappropriate inasmuch as it could discourage proper
consideration of matters involving them. They were, at times,
invited to be present. Isnt it fair NOW to
ask: What does that say about allowing them to rule
the roost?
When a Chairman also runs a company, the information
received by directors, auditors, and stockholders may not be
accurate. If a Chairman/CEO wishes to cover up corporate
improprieties, how difficult is it to convince subordinates to
go along? If they refuse, to whom do wary subordinates complain?
As a banker, investment banker, and concerned and
outspoken stockholder, my experience with corporate officers and
directors and stockholders has been considerableand gained
over a considerable period.
It is unfortunate that so few individual outside
stockholders ever become well-informed about the companies in
which they risk their hard-earned money. And almost none ever
question corporate actions. Far too many institutional investors
are in the same boat. And that combination of stockholders has
proven a recipe for disasters.
Although institutional stockholders are charged by law
with protecting their investors, most that I have encountered
were far more interested in currying favor with managements than
in questioning them. They wont chance losing collateral
business and access to the extremely profitable Inside
Information Superhighway. They are easy prey for
managements that spend considerable time and stockholder money
convincing large holders to vote against stockholder
proposals that challenge what is fast becoming their absolute
power.
Please vote FOR this proposal.
Position
of the Board
Wachovias board recommends that stockholders vote
AGAINST the proposal set forth above for the
following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
If adopted, the proposal would unnecessarily reduce the
boards flexibility in corporate governance matters;
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
Wachovias lead independent director structure is a
recognized viable corporate governance structure having benefits
very similar to the proposal; and
|
|
|
|
Wachovias strong corporate governance practices and its
corporate performance do not require the changes requested in
the proposal.
|
The board believes that it would not be in the best interests of
Wachovia and its stockholders to require that the Chairman of
the Board serve in that capacity only and have no management
duties, titles or responsibilities. The proposal would prevent
Wachovias Chief Executive Officer from also serving as
Chairman of the Board, and suggests that separating the role of
Chairman of the Board from the Chief Executive Officer is
necessary for ensuring an independent board. The board strongly
disagrees with the proposal because it believes that its
existing corporate governance practices already provide for
strong independent leadership on the board, as well as direct
accountability to stockholders.
As provided in the boards Corporate Governance Guidelines,
the board believes that a substantial majority of the board
should consist of independent directors, and 89% of the members
of the board are independent directors, as determined in
accordance with NYSE rules and the boards independence
standards described in Corporate Governance Policies and
PracticesDirector Independence. Each of the members
of the boards Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committee, Audit Committee and Management Resources &
Compensation Committee are independent directors.
The boards independent leadership is further enhanced by
the existence of a lead independent director, which has been in
place at Wachovia since 2000. The lead independent director is
elected by the independent directors and has clearly delineated
duties. As set forth in the boards Corporate Governance
Guidelines, the lead independent director, among other things,
assists the Chairman of the Board with board related matters,
including approving meeting schedules and agendas, and acts as a
liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors. The
board understands that corporate governance experts recognize
that having a lead independent director is a viable corporate
governance structure, having benefits very similar to separating
the role of Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive
Officer.
The board believes that the existence of the lead independent
director, as well as some of its other governance practices,
ensures the independent exchange of information among
Wachovias independent directors and provides Wachovia and
its stockholders with the same benefits that the proposal
suggests may only be obtained by separating the role of Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. For example, as set
forth in the boards Corporate Governance Guidelines or as
provided in other practices of the board or Wachovia,
|
|
|
|
|
the board meets with the non-management directors in executive
session at least three times a year and meets in executive
session with only the independent directors at least once a year;
|
|
|
|
the lead independent director presides at all meetings of the
non-management directors and the independent directors;
|
|
|
|
the lead independent director may also call meetings of the
independent directors, if desired;
|
|
|
|
the board has provided a process for stockholders to communicate
directly with one or more directors, including the lead
independent director; and
|
|
|
|
Wachovias corporate governance website also provides a
method for interested parties to communicate directly with the
boards Audit Committee.
|
As noted in the boards Corporate Governance Guidelines,
given the existence of the lead independent director and
Wachovias overall governance profile, as well as the
boards belief that it should maintain the flexibility to
determine the leadership of Wachovia, the board does not have a
fixed policy regarding the separation of the offices of the
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The
stockholder proposal, however, would unnecessarily eliminate the
flexibility of the board to consider whether a member of
management is the best suited to serve as Chairman of the Board
at a given time. The board believes that Wachovia and its
stockholders benefit from the boards current ability to
freely select the Chairman of the Board based on criteria that
it deems to be in the best interests of Wachovia and its
stockholders.
86
In the boards view, Wachovias stockholders have
benefited from the boards current sound corporate
governance practices and strong independent board leadership,
and there is no need to require the separation of the role of
Chairman of the Board from Chief Executive Officer.
Wachovias performance, which includes five consecutive
years of double digit earnings per share growth and a stock that
has significantly outperformed the Keefe, Bruyette &
Woods Bank Stock Index and the S&P 500 Index over the past
five years (as shown in Performance Graph), is solid
evidence that our current corporate governance structure is
working.
WACHOVIAS BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE
AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL. PROXIES, UNLESS INDICATED TO
THE CONTRARY, WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THIS
PROPOSAL.
OTHER
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Management is not aware of any other matters to be voted on at
the meeting. If any other matters are presented for a vote, the
enclosed proxy confers discretionary authority to the
individuals named as proxies to vote the shares represented by
proxy, as to those matters.
Stockholder proposals intended to be included in our proxy
statement and voted on at the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders must be received at our offices at 301 South
College Street, Charlotte, North Carolina
28288-0013,
Attention: Corporate Secretary, on or before November 10,
2007. Applicable SEC rules and regulations govern the submission
of stockholder proposals and our consideration of them for
inclusion in next years proxy statement and form of proxy.
Pursuant to Wachovias bylaws, in order for any business
not included in the proxy statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders to be brought before the meeting by a
stockholder, the stockholder must be entitled to vote at that
meeting and must give timely written notice of that business to
Wachovias Corporate Secretary. That meeting is currently
scheduled to be held on April 22, 2008, and to be timely,
the notice must not be received any earlier than
January 18, 2008 (90 days prior to April 17,
2008, the first anniversary of this years annual meeting
date), nor any later than February 17, 2008 (60 days
prior to April 17, 2008). If the date of the meeting is
advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than
60 days from April 22, 2008, the notice must be
received no earlier than the 90th day prior to the 2008
annual meeting and not later than either the 60th day prior
to the 2008 annual meeting or the tenth day after public
disclosure of the actual meeting date, whichever is later. The
notice must contain the information required by our bylaws.
Similarly, a stockholder wishing to submit a director nomination
directly at an annual meeting of stockholders must deliver
written notice of the nomination within the time period
described in this paragraph and comply with the information
requirements in our bylaws relating to stockholder nominations.
For information regarding stockholder nominations to be
considered by the Corporate Governance & Nominating
Committee, see Corporate Governance Policies and
Practices Director Nomination Process. A proxy
may confer discretionary authority to vote on any matter at a
meeting if we do not receive notice of the matter within the
time-frames described above. A copy of our bylaws is available
upon request to: Wachovia Corporation, 301 South College Street,
Charlotte, North Carolina
28288-0013,
Attention: Corporate Secretary. The Chairman of the meeting may
exclude matters that are not properly presented in accordance
with the foregoing requirements.
MISCELLANEOUS
The information referred to under the captions
Compensation Committee Report, Performance
Graph, and Audit Committee Report (to the
extent permitted under the 1934 Act) (i) shall not be
deemed to be soliciting material or to be
filed with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A
or the liabilities of Section 18 of the 1934 Act, and
(ii) notwithstanding anything to the contrary that may be
contained in any filing by Wachovia under the 1934 Act or
the Securities Act of 1933, shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference in any such filing.
March 9, 2007
87
Appendix A
Director
Independence Standards
The rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
provide that a Wachovia director does not qualify as independent
unless the board of directors affirmatively determines that the
director has no material relationship with Wachovia. The NYSE
rules require a board to consider all of the relevant facts and
circumstances in determining the materiality of a
directors relationship with Wachovia, and permit the board
to adopt and disclose standards to assist the board in making
determinations of independence. Accordingly, the board has
adopted the independence standards outlined below to assist the
board in determining whether a director has a material
relationship with Wachovia. These independence standards should
be read together with the NYSEs independence rules,
including the bright line tests and the applicable look-back
periods contained in the NYSEs rules.
Customer
Relationships
General
Standard for Wachovia Customer Relationships
A lending, deposit, banking, brokerage, investment advisory,
investment banking, insurance, trust, custodial or other
customer relationship between Wachovia and (i) a director,
(ii) an Affiliated Entity of a director, (iii) an
Immediate Family Member, or (iv) an Affiliated Entity of an
Immediate Family Member will not be deemed a material
relationship if the relationship was made in the ordinary course
of business and on substantially the same terms as those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other
nonaffiliated persons and, to the extent applicable, the
relationship satisfies the other specific customer relationship
standards for the director and Immediate Family Member
relationships described below.
Specific
Standards for Wachovia Customer Relationships
A relationship is not material if Wachovia is providing
financial services to an entity where a director is an employee,
or to an entity where an Immediate Family Member is an executive
officer, and the payments (i.e. interest payments and fees on
loans and fees for financial services) made by the entity to
Wachovia, or received by the other entity from Wachovia, for
such financial services, in any fiscal year, are less than the
greater of $1 million or two percent of such other
entitys consolidated gross revenues.
Lending
Relationships
A relationship is not material if Wachovia is providing lending
services to (i) a director, (ii) an Affiliated Entity
of a director, (iii) an Immediate Family Member, or
(iv) an Affiliated Entity of an Immediate Family Member who
shares the directors home or who is financially dependent
on the director and
|
|
|
(a) |
|
the loan or extension of credit was made in the ordinary course
of business and on substantially the same terms, including
interest rates and collateral, as, and following credit
underwriting procedures that were not less stringent than, those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other
nonaffiliated persons; |
|
(b) |
|
the loan or extension of credit when made did not involve more
than the normal risk of collectability or, from Wachovias
perspective, present other unfavorable features; |
|
(c) |
|
the loan or extension of credit otherwise complies with
applicable law, including Regulation O of the Federal
Reserve Board; and |
|
(d) |
|
the loan or extension of credit is not classified as nonaccrual,
past due, restructured or potential problems (as provided in
Item III.C.1. and 2. of Industry Guide 3, Statistical
Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies). |
A-1
Supplier
or Other Business Relationships
General
Standard for Supplier or Other Business Relationships
A supplier or other business relationship between Wachovia and
(i) a director, (ii) an Affiliated Entity of a
director, (iii) an Immediate Family Member, or (iv) an
Affiliated Entity of an Immediate Family Member will not be
deemed a material relationship if the relationship was made in
the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same
terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with other nonaffiliated persons and, to the extent
applicable, the relationship satisfies the other specific
business relationship standard for the director and Immediate
Family Member relationships described below.
Specific
Standard for Supplier or Other Business Relationships
The supplier or other business relationship is not material if
the business transaction involves Wachovia and an Affiliated
Entity of a director, or an Affiliated Entity of an Immediate
Family Member, and the payments made by the entity to Wachovia,
or received by the other entity from Wachovia, for property or
services, in any fiscal year, are less than the greater of
$1 million or two percent of such other entitys
consolidated gross revenues.
Family
Relationships
The employment by Wachovia of an Immediate Family Member will
not be deemed a material relationship if (i) the Immediate
Family Member is not an executive officer of Wachovia and
(ii) the compensation and benefits of the Immediate Family
Member were established by Wachovia in accordance with the
compensation policies and practices applicable to Wachovia
employees in comparable positions.
Charitable
Relationships
Contributions, other than matching gift contributions, by
Wachovia or the Wachovia Foundation, to a non-profit entity,
including educational institutions, where a director or an
Immediate Family Member is employed as an executive officer will
not be deemed a material relationship if the contributions, in
any fiscal year, are less than the greater of $1 million or
two percent of such other entitys consolidated gross
revenues.
Consulting
or Advisory Relationships
A director may not accept from Wachovia any payments for
consulting, advisory or other personal services, other than
director and committee fees and pension or other forms of
deferred compensation for prior service (provided such
compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service).
Other
Relationships
Relationships, including charitable relationships, between
Wachovia and an entity, including a non-profit entity or other
charitable organization, where a director or an Immediate Family
Member serves solely as a non-management director, advisory
director or trustee (or in a similar capacity) will not be
deemed a material relationship.
Definitions
Affiliated Entity of a director means any entity (i) where
the director is an employee or (ii) that is a related
interest (as defined in Regulation O of the Federal
Reserve Board) of a director.
Affiliated Entity of an Immediate Family Member means any entity
(i) where the Immediate Family Member is an executive
officer or (ii) that would be a related
interest (as defined in Regulation O of the Federal
Reserve Board) of an Immediate Family Member.
A-2
Immediate Family Member means a directors spouse, parents,
children, siblings, mothers and
fathers-in-law,
sons and
daughters-in-law,
brothers and
sisters-in-law,
and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares the
directors home.
Wachovia means Wachovia or any of its subsidiaries.
A-3
Appendix B
Proposed
Amendments to Wachovias Articles of Incorporation
Regarding Eliminating the Provisions Classifying the Terms of
Directors
Article 7 of the Articles of Incorporation is hereby
amended by deleting the second full paragraph thereof and by
deleting the last sentence of the third paragraph thereof, as
set forth below:
7. The number of directors shall be determined
from time to time by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
directors then in office, but the number of directors shall not
be less than nine or more than 30, provided that no decrease in
the number of directors shall shorten the term of any director
then in office.
The board of directors shall be divided into three
classes, as determined by the affirmative vote of a majority of
the directors then in office, each class to be as nearly equal
in number as possible to each other class. At the annual meeting
of shareholders in 1989, one class of directors shall be elected
to hold office initially for a term expiring at the 1990 annual
meeting of shareholders, a second class of directors shall be
elected to hold office initially for a term expiring at the 1991
annual meeting of shareholders, and a third class of directors
shall be elected to hold office initially for a term expiring at
the 1992 annual meeting of shareholders, in each case to hold
office until their successors have been duly elected and
qualified. At each annual meeting of shareholders, the
successors to the class of directors whose term expires at such
meeting shall be elected to hold office for a term expiring at
the annual meeting of shareholders held in the third year
following the year of their election and until their successors
have been duly elected and qualified.
Vacancies in the board of directors that occur between annual
meetings of shareholders at which directors are elected,
including vacancies resulting from an enlargement of the board
within the authorized number of nine to 30 directors, shall be
filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining
directors even though less than a quorum or by a sole remaining
director, except that any vacancies resulting from removal from
office by a vote of shareholders may be filled by a vote of
shareholders at the same meeting at which such removal occurs.
The directors elected to fill such vacancies shall hold
office for a term expiring at the next annual meeting of
shareholders at which the term of the class of directors to
which they have been elected expires and until their successors
have been duly elected and qualified.
Any director or directors may be removed from office only for
cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the
corporation entitled to vote in the election of directors,
voting together as a single class.
The foregoing provisions of this Article 7 shall not apply
to any director who may be elected under specified circumstances
by holders of any class or series of stock having a preference
over the common stock as to dividends or upon liquidation.
Special meetings of shareholders, other than special meetings
called under specified circumstances for holders of any class or
series of stock of the corporation having a preference over the
common stock as to dividends or upon liquidation, may be called
only by the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board, or
the President of the corporation.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Charter or the
By-laws of the corporation (and as permitted under North
Carolina law to require higher voting percentages than otherwise
prescribed by law), the affirmative vote of the holders of not
less than 80% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the
corporation entitled to vote in the election of directors,
voting together as a single class, shall be required to amend or
repeal, or to adopt any provision (in this Charter, the By-laws
of the corporation or otherwise) or take any action inconsistent
with or (as to any matter covered by this
Article 7) in a manner other than as prescribed by,
this Article 7.
B-1
Appendix C
Proposed
Amendments to Wachovias Articles of Incorporation
Regarding Majority Voting in Uncontested Director
Elections
The Articles of Incorporation are
hereby amended by adding the following paragraph 12 to the
Articles of Incorporation, which shall read as follows:
12. Except as may otherwise
be provided by these Articles of Incorporation, a nominee for
director in an uncontested election shall be elected to the
board of directors if the votes cast for such nominees
election exceed the votes cast against such nominees
election. For purposes of the foregoing, an uncontested
election means any meeting of shareholders at which
directors are elected and with respect to which either
(i) no shareholder has submitted to the Secretary of the
corporation a notice of an intent to nominate a candidate for
election at such meeting pursuant to the advance notice
requirements for shareholder nominees for director set forth in
the corporations By-laws or (ii) if such a notice has
been submitted with respect to such meeting, all such notices
with respect to such meeting have been withdrawn by their
respective submitting shareholders in writing to the Secretary
of the corporation on or before the tenth day preceding the date
the corporation first mails its notice of meeting for such
meeting to the shareholders. In the event that votes cast for a
nominees election are equal to or less than the votes cast
against such nominees election in an uncontested election,
the board of directors may decrease the number of directors,
fill any vacancy, or take other appropriate action. In all
director elections other than uncontested elections, directors
shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast.
C-1
THERE ARE THREE WAYS TO VOTE YOUR PROXY
|
|
|
|
|
TELEPHONE VOTING |
|
INTERNET VOTING |
|
VOTING BY MAIL |
|
|
|
|
|
This method of voting is
available for residents of the
U.S. and Canada. On a touch
tone telephone, call TOLL
FREE 1-877-816-0869, 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week. Have this
proxy card ready, then follow the
prerecorded instructions. Your
vote will be confirmed and cast
as you have directed. Available
until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight
Time on April 16, 2007.
|
|
Visit the Internet voting Web site
at http://proxy.georgeson.com.
Have this proxy card ready and
follow the instructions on your
screen. You will incur only your
usual Internet charges. Available
until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight
Time on April 16, 2007
|
|
Simply mark, sign and date
your proxy card and return it
in the postage-paid envelope
to Georgeson Inc., Wall Street
Station, P.O. Box 1100, New
York, NY 10269-0646. If you
are voting by telephone or the
Internet, please do not mail
your proxy card. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Please mark
votes as in
this example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3 AND 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
AGAINST PROPOSALS 5, 6, 7 AND 8. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
1.
|
|
A Wachovia proposal to elect directors.
Class I: Ernest S. Rady
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
A stockholder proposal regarding non-binding
stockholder vote ratifying executive compensation.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
Class II: Jerry Gitt
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
WITHHOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class III: John T. Casteen, III, Maryellen C. Herringer,
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Neubauer, Timothy D. Proctor, Van L. Richey
and Dona Davis Young |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS: to withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s),
write name(s) in the space provided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
|
|
A stockholder proposal regarding qualifications of director nominees.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
A Wachovia proposal to amend Wachovias articles of incorporation to
eliminate the provisions classifying the terms of its board of directors.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
|
A stockholder proposal regarding reporting political contributions.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
3.
|
|
A Wachovia proposal to amend Wachovias articles of incorporation to
provide for majority voting in uncontested director elections.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
A Wachovia proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as auditors for
the year 2007.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
8. |
|
|
A stockholder proposal regarding
separating the offices of chairman and chief executive officer.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I will attend the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature (if held jointly) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: Signature(s) should agree with name(s) on
proxy card. Executors, administrators, trustees and
other fiduciaries, and persons signing on behalf of
corporations, or partnerships, should so indicate
when signing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTIONS
|
|
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Wachovia Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 9:30 am |
|
|
|
|
Charlotte Convention Center (Room 203AB), 501 South College Street, Charlotte, NC 28202 |
|
|
Free parking is available in Wachovia 1,2 and 3 garages. Enter Wachovia 1 and 2 garages from
Martin Luther King Blvd. Enter Wachovia 3 garage from S. College St. Enter the Convention Center
from South College St. Go upstairs to Room 203AB.
Driving
South on l-85 from points North of Charlotte: Take Brookshire
Frwy (Highway 16 S), Exit 36.
Merge right onto the 1-277 loop (John Belk Frwy). Take Stonewall St, Exit 1E. Turn left on
Stonewall St and proceed 3 blocks. Turn right onto College St. The Convention Center will be on
your right. Wachovia parking garages will be ahead. (Please see map).
Driving
North on l-85 from points South of Charlotte: Take Little Rock Rd, Exit 32. Turn right at
the bottom of the ramp. Turn right at the first traffic light. Turn left at the traffic light onto
Wilkinson Blvd (Hwy 74 E). Follow Wilkinson Blvd as it becomes the 1-277 loop (John Belk Frwy).
Take College St, Exit 1E. The Convention Center will be on your right after you cross Stonewall St.
Wachovia parking garages will be ahead.
Driving
South on l-77 from points North of Charlotte: Take the 1-277 loop (John Belk
Frwy), Exit 9. Take College St, Exit 1E. The Convention Center will be on your right after
you cross Stonewall St. Wachovia parking garages will be ahead.
Driving North on l-77 from points South of Charlotte: Take the l-277 loop (John Belk
Frwy), Exit 9B. Take College St, Exit 1E. The Convention Center will be on your right
after you cross Stonewall St. Wachovia parking garages will be ahead.
Driving East on US Highway 74 (Wilkinson Boulevard) from points West of Charlotte:
Follow Wilkinson Blvd (Highway 74 E) as it becomes the l-277 loop (John Belk Frwy).
Take College St, Exit 1E. The Convention Center will be on your right after you cross
Stonewall St. Wachovia parking garages will be ahead.
Driving West on US Highway 74 (Independence Boulevard) from points East of
Charlotte: Follow Independence Blvd (Highway 74 W) and merge left onto the l-277
loop (John Belk Frwy). Take Stonewall St, Exit 1E. Turn left onto Stonewall St and
proceed 3 blocks. Turn right onto College St. The Convention Center will be on your
right. Wachovia parking garages will be ahead.
TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE
WACHOVIA CORPORATION
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
APRIL 17, 2007
|
|
|
|
P
R
O
X
Y
|
|
The undersigned holder of shares of common stock of Wachovia Corporation (the Corporation) hereby
constitutes and appoints Benjamin P. Jenkins, III, and Shannon W. McFayden, or either of them, the lawful
attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, each with full power of substitution, for and on behalf
of the undersigned, to vote as specified on the matters set forth on the reverse side, all of the
shares of the Corporations common stock held of record by the undersigned on February 12, 2007, at
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Corporation to be held on April 17, 2007, at 9:30 a.m.
EDT, at the Charlotte Convention Center, 501 South College Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28202,
and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IF NO
SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AND AGAINST
PROPOSALS 5, 6, 7 AND 8. IF ANY OTHER MATTERS ARE VOTED ON AT THE MEETING, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED
BY THE PROXYHOLDERS ON SUCH MATTERS IN THEIR SOLE DISCRETION.
PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THIS PROXY ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND MAIL WITHOUT DELAY IN THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |
|
SEE REVERSE SIDE
Return to:
Georgeson Shareholder Communications
Wall Street Station
P.O. Box 1100
New York, NY 10269-0646