UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

 

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.   )

 

Filed by the Registrant   x                            

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

 

o Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

o Definitive Proxy Statement

 

x Definitive Additional Materials

 

o Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

 

INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x No fee required.

 

o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

  (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 
  (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 
  (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 
  (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 
  (5)  

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

  (1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 
  (2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 
  (3)

Filing Party:

 

 
  (4)

Date Filed:

 


Quotations of Mr. Philip G. Satre, Chairman of the Board of International Game Technology, were included in an article by Mr. Christopher Palmeri on Bloomberg on February 22, 2013.

Excerpts containing such quotations as published by Bloomberg are set forth below.

 

* * * * *

 

International Game Technology Chairman Philip Satre, locked in a fight over board seats, said the world’s largest slot-machine maker has to invest online because young people don’t gamble as much as their parents. “They won’t sit at a machine for two hours or three hours,” Satre, 63, said in an interview. “It is to me one of the biggest single challenges for the gaming industry, having products that are relevant to this new generation.”

 

* * * * *

 

Satre, who was CEO of Harrah’s Entertainment until 2003, said the acquisitions of online companies provided needed technology. IGT spent as much as $500 million last year for Double Down Interactive, a maker of casino-like games for Facebook.com. It paid about $115 million in 2011 for Entraction Holdings AB, a European online gambling business.

 

Forty-six of IGT’s casino-industry customers are offering Double Down’s social games on their websites, according to IGT.

 

Younger Players

 

“This is an incredible opportunity for us to take our content that we’ve developed for our bricks and mortar casinos and move it into another space,” Satre said. The goal is to excite younger players through online play and get them to spend more on slots when they do come to casinos, he said.

 

* * * * *

 

Satre also said management is taking steps to rebuild its share of the North American slot machine business, which shrank to 29 percent in 2010 from 66 percent seven years earlier, according to Eilers. IGT’s share last year was 36 percent.

 

“This company was in a precipitous decline in performance and it wasn’t just the recession,” Satre said.

 

The company has also seen an increase in customers identifying IGT as producing the highest winnings per machine.

 

“We have regained share in our core products,” Satre said. “We built up our studios. We brought in talent.”