KLAC 10Q 3/31/13
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)
T
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
or
£
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to             
Commission File Number 000-09992
KLA-Tencor Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  
Delaware
 
04-2564110
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
 
One Technology Drive, Milpitas, California
 
95035
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)
(408) 875-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer £
 
Non-accelerated filer £
 
Smaller reporting company £
 
 
 
 
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes £    No  x
As of April 12, 2013, there were 165,885,681 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.

Table of Contents

INDEX
 
 
 
Page
Number
 
 
 
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
 
 
 
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1
Item 1A
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
Item 5
Item 6
 
 
 
 
 
 


 

2
Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
 
(In thousands)
March 31,
2013
 
June 30,
2012
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
934,201

 
$
751,294

Marketable securities
1,945,302

 
1,783,150

Accounts receivable, net
454,224

 
701,280

Inventories
649,822

 
650,802

Deferred income taxes
178,928

 
184,670

Other current assets
101,179

 
92,847

Total current assets
4,263,656

 
4,164,043

Land, property and equipment, net
298,617

 
277,686

Goodwill
326,792

 
327,716

Purchased intangibles, net
39,008

 
55,636

Other non-current assets
266,400

 
275,227

Total assets
$
5,194,473

 
$
5,100,308

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Current liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
107,753

 
$
139,183

Deferred system profit
136,816

 
147,218

Unearned revenue
63,751

 
63,095

Other current liabilities
511,688

 
513,411

Total current liabilities
820,008

 
862,907

Non-current liabilities:
 
 
 
Long-term debt
747,240

 
746,833

Income tax payable
59,104

 
50,839

Unearned revenue
32,321

 
34,899

Other non-current liabilities
89,417

 
89,235

Total liabilities
1,748,090

 
1,784,713

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11 and Note 12)

 

Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Common stock and capital in excess of par value
1,141,959

 
1,089,480

Retained earnings
2,329,251

 
2,247,258

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(24,827
)
 
(21,143
)
Total stockholders’ equity
3,446,383

 
3,315,595

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
5,194,473

 
$
5,100,308

 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

3
Table of Contents

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three months ended
 
Nine months ended
 
March 31,
 
March 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Product
$
579,746

 
$
701,179

 
$
1,676,847

 
$
1,852,094

Service
149,283

 
139,342

 
445,902

 
427,385

Total revenues
729,029

 
840,521

 
2,122,749

 
2,279,479

Costs and operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Costs of revenues
309,508

 
355,149

 
930,648

 
968,353

Engineering, research and development
118,788

 
110,102

 
360,138

 
334,227

Selling, general and administrative
98,487

 
90,996

 
289,913

 
278,873

Total costs and operating expenses
526,783

 
556,247

 
1,580,699

 
1,581,453

Income from operations
202,246

 
284,274

 
542,050

 
698,026

Interest income and other, net
3,338

 
3,264

 
11,884

 
10,870

Interest expense
13,469

 
13,505

 
40,403

 
40,694

Income before income taxes
192,115

 
274,033

 
513,531

 
668,202

Provision for income taxes
25,733

 
68,687

 
105,152

 
160,064

Net income
$
166,382

 
$
205,346

 
$
408,379

 
$
508,138

Net income per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
1.00

 
$
1.23

 
$
2.46

 
$
3.05

Diluted
$
0.98

 
$
1.21

 
$
2.41

 
$
2.99

Cash dividends declared per share
$
0.40

 
$
0.35

 
$
1.20

 
$
1.05

Weighted average number of shares:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
166,234

 
167,070

 
166,297

 
166,748

Diluted
169,180

 
170,146

 
169,425

 
170,023

 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

4
Table of Contents

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)

 
Three months ended
 
Nine months ended
 
March 31,
 
March 31,
(In thousands)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Net income
$
166,382

 
$
205,346

 
$
408,379

 
$
508,138

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Currency translation adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in currency translation adjustments
(10,753
)
 
1,085

 
(5,257
)
 
(8,527
)
Change in income tax benefit or expense
1,223

 
(1,018
)
 
(1,489
)
 
2,268

Net change related to currency translation adjustments
(9,530
)
 
67

 
(6,746
)
 
(6,259
)
Cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in net unrealized gains or losses
842

 
2,269

 
2,843

 
852

Reclassification adjustments for gains or losses included in net income
(848
)
 
98

 
116

 
1,023

Change in income tax benefit or expense
2

 
(842
)
 
(1,054
)
 
(667
)
Net change related to cash flow hedges
(4
)
 
1,525

 
1,905

 
1,208

Net change related to unrecognized losses and transition obligations in connection with defined benefit plans
155

 
113

 
473

 
355

Available-for-sale investments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Change in net unrealized gains or losses
105

 
1,525

 
3,054

 
(2,135
)
Reclassification adjustments for gains or losses included in net income
(712
)
 
96

 
(2,069
)
 
652

Change in income tax benefit or expense
217

 
(571
)
 
(301
)
 
621

Net change related to available-for-sale securities
(390
)
 
1,050

 
684

 
(862
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
(9,769
)
 
2,755

 
(3,684
)
 
(5,558
)
Total comprehensive income
$
156,613

 
$
208,101

 
$
404,695

 
$
502,580


See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

5
Table of Contents

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
(In thousands)
2013
 
2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income
$
408,379

 
$
508,138

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
67,109

 
68,851

Asset impairment charges
1,327

 
1,378

Net gain on sale of assets
(1,160
)
 
—

Non-cash stock-based compensation expense
52,478

 
61,056

Excess tax benefit from equity awards
(13,965
)
 
—

Net gain on sale of marketable securities and other investments
(2,069
)
 
(652
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable, net
232,347

 
(52,290
)
Decrease (increase) in inventories
671

 
(86,535
)
Decrease in other assets
3,367

 
19,629

Decrease in accounts payable
(30,866
)
 
(3,497
)
Decrease in deferred system profit
(10,402
)
 
(8,641
)
Increase in other liabilities
30,403

 
160,874

Net cash provided by operating activities
737,619

 
668,311

Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
Capital expenditures, net
(55,663
)
 
(41,324
)
Proceeds from sale of assets
1,838

 
2,228

Purchase of available-for-sale securities
(1,178,157
)
 
(1,114,703
)
Proceeds from sale and maturity of available-for-sale securities
1,006,368

 
823,423

Purchase of trading securities
(33,917
)
 
(44,872
)
Proceeds from sale of trading securities
34,492

 
45,468

Net cash used in investing activities
(225,039
)
 
(329,780
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock
95,542

 
123,738

Tax withholding payments related to vested and released restricted stock units
(29,160
)
 
(29,838
)
Common stock repurchases
(204,943
)
 
(196,906
)
Payment of dividends to stockholders
(199,712
)
 
(175,085
)
Excess tax benefit from equity awards
13,965

 
—

Net cash used in financing activities
(324,308
)
 
(278,091
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
(5,365
)
 
(7,856
)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
182,907

 
52,584

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
751,294

 
711,329

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
934,201

 
$
763,913

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
 
 
 
Income taxes paid, net
$
87,245

 
$
17,369

Interest paid
$
27,119

 
$
27,763

 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

6
Table of Contents

KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Basis of Presentation. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by KLA-Tencor Corporation (“KLA-Tencor” or the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated. These financial statements and notes, however, should be read in conjunction with Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, filed with the SEC on August 6, 2012.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of KLA-Tencor and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal year ending June 30, 2013.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and notes to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations or Cash Flows.
Management Estimates. The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition. KLA-Tencor recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. In general, the Company recognizes revenue for system sales upon acceptance by the customer that the system has been installed and is operating according to predetermined specifications. When a customer delays installation for products for which the Company has demonstrated a history of successful installation and acceptance, the Company recognizes revenue for system sales upon customer acceptance, if the product has been delivered to the customer. Under certain circumstances, however, the Company recognizes revenue upon shipment, prior to acceptance from the customer, as follows:
•
When the customer fab has previously accepted the same tool, with the same specifications, and when the Company can objectively demonstrate that the tool meets all of the required acceptance criteria.
•
When system sales to independent distributors have no installation requirement, contain no acceptance agreement, and 100% payment is due based upon shipment.
•
When the installation of the system is deemed perfunctory.
•
When the customer withholds acceptance due to issues unrelated to product performance, in which case revenue is recognized when the system is performing as intended and meets all published and agreed-upon specifications.
The portion of revenue associated with installation is deferred based on relative selling price and recognized upon completion of the installation.
In many instances, products are sold in stand-alone arrangements. Services are sold separately through renewals of annual maintenance contracts. The Company also allows for multiple element revenue arrangements in cases where certain elements of a sales arrangement are not delivered and accepted in one reporting period. To determine the relative fair value of each element in a revenue arrangement, the Company allocates arrangement consideration based on the selling price hierarchy. For substantially all of the arrangements with multiple deliverables pertaining to products and services, the Company uses vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) or third-party evidence (“TPE”) to allocate the selling price to each deliverable. The Company determines TPE based on historical prices charged for products and services when sold on a stand-alone basis. When the Company is unable to establish relative selling price using VSOE or TPE, the Company uses estimated selling price (“ESP”) in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which the Company

7
Table of Contents

would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis. ESP could potentially be used for new or customized products. The Company regularly reviews relative selling prices and maintains internal controls over the establishment and updates of these estimates. In a multiple element revenue arrangement, the Company defers revenue recognition associated with the relative fair value of the undelivered elements until that element is delivered to the customer. To be considered a separate element, the product or service in question must represent a separate unit of accounting, which means that such product or service must fulfill the following criteria: (a) the delivered item(s) has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis; and (b) if the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s), delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company. If the arrangement does not meet all the above criteria, the entire amount of the sales contract is deferred until all elements are accepted by the customer.
Trade-in rights are occasionally granted to customers to trade in tools in connection with subsequent purchases. The Company estimates the value of the trade-in right and reduces the revenue recognized on the initial sale. This amount is recognized at the earlier of the exercise of the trade-in right or the expiration of the trade-in right.
 Spare parts revenue is recognized when the product has been shipped, risk of loss has passed to the customer and collection of the resulting receivable is probable.
Service and maintenance contract revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance contract. Revenue from services performed in the absence of a maintenance contract, including consulting and training revenue, is recognized when the related services are performed and collectibility is reasonably assured.
The Company sells stand-alone software that is subject to the software revenue recognition guidance. The Company periodically reviews selling prices to determine whether VSOE exists, and in some situations where the Company is unable to establish VSOE for undelivered elements such as post-contract service, revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the service contract.
The Company also defers the fair value of non-standard warranty bundled with equipment sales as unearned revenue. Non-standard warranty includes services incremental to the standard 40-hour per week coverage for twelve months. Non-standard warranty is recognized ratably as revenue when the applicable warranty term period commences.
The deferred system profit balance equals the amount of deferred system revenue that was invoiced and due on shipment, less applicable product and warranty costs. Deferred system revenue represents the value of products that have been shipped and billed to customers which have not met the Company's revenue recognition criteria. Deferred system profit does not include the profit associated with product shipments to customers in Japan, to whom title does not transfer until customer acceptance. Shipments to customers in Japan are classified as inventory at cost until the time of acceptance.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update requiring an increase in the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. The amendment eliminated the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity and required that total comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income be presented in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendment became effective for the Company's interim period ended September 30, 2012. In February 2013, the FASB issued an accounting standard update on the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income of various components, which was originally deferred by the FASB in December 2011. The February 2013 update does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. However, this update requires an entity to present parenthetically (on the face of the financial statements, in the notes, or in some cases, cross-referenced to related footnote disclosures) significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income and the income statement line items affected by the reclassification. The amendment reflected in the February 2013 update becomes effective prospectively for the Company's interim period ending September 30, 2013. Early adoption is permitted. The amendment reflected in the February 2013 update will not have an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows as it is disclosure-only in nature.
In September 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standard update intended to simplify testing goodwill for impairment. The amendments allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. An entity is no longer required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The amendment, by its terms, became effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for the Company's fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, and early adoption was permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this accounting guidance at the beginning of the three months ended December 31, 2011 (see Note 5, “Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets,” for a detailed description).

8
Table of Contents

NOTE 2 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured and recorded at fair value, except for equity investments in privately-held companies. These equity investments are generally accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are periodically assessed for other-than-temporary impairment when an event or circumstance indicates that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred. The Company’s non-financial assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets, and land, property and equipment, are recorded at cost and are assessed for impairment when an event or circumstance indicates that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred.
Fair Value Hierarchy. The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1
  
Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access.
 
 
 
Level 2
  
Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
 
 
 
Level 3
  
Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
All of the Company’s financial instruments were classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2013, because they were valued using quoted market prices, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. As of March 31, 2013, the types of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets included money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities and certain U.S. Government agency securities and sovereign securities. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
As of March 31, 2013, the types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs included corporate debt securities, municipal securities and certain U.S. Government agency securities and sovereign securities. The market inputs used to value these instruments generally consist of market yields, reported trades and broker/dealer quotes. Such instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The principal market in which the Company executes its foreign currency contracts is the institutional market in an over-the-counter environment with a relatively high level of price transparency. The market participants usually are large commercial banks. The Company’s foreign currency contracts’ valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and quoted pricing intervals from public data sources and do not involve management judgment. These contracts are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

9
Table of Contents

Financial assets (excluding cash held in operating accounts and time deposits) and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the date indicated below were presented on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:
As of March 31, 2013 (In thousands)
Total
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Government agency securities
$
6,000

 
$
—

 
$
6,000

Corporate debt securities
24,264

 
—

 
24,264

Money market and other
735,000

 
735,000

 
—

Marketable securities:
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury securities
99,022

 
99,022

 
—

U.S. Government agency securities
653,826

 
653,826

 
—

Municipal securities
82,729

 
—

 
82,729

Corporate debt securities
1,045,256

 
—

 
1,045,256

Sovereign securities
23,852

 
9,529

 
14,323

Total cash equivalents and marketable securities(1)
2,669,949

 
1,497,377

 
1,172,572

Other current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative assets
4,462

 
—

 
4,462

Other non-current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Executive Deferred Savings Plan:
 
 
 
 
 
Money market and other
1,659

 
1,659

 
—

Mutual funds
136,225

 
96,909

 
39,316

Executive Deferred Savings Plan total
137,884

 
98,568

 
39,316

Total financial assets(1)
$
2,812,295

 
$
1,595,945

 
$
1,216,350

Other current liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative liabilities
$
(1,839
)
 
$
—

 
$
(1,839
)
Executive Deferred Savings Plan:
 
 
 
 
 
Money market and other
(12,266
)
 
(12,266
)
 
—

Mutual funds
(126,435
)
 
(87,051
)
 
(39,384
)
Executive Deferred Savings Plan total
(138,701
)
 
(99,317
)
 
(39,384
)
Total financial liabilities
$
(140,540
)
 
$
(99,317
)
 
$
(41,223
)
________________
(1) Excludes cash of $156.1 million held in operating accounts and time deposits of $53.5 million as of March 31, 2013.


10
Table of Contents

Financial assets (excluding cash held in operating accounts and time deposits) and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the date indicated below were presented on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as follows:  
As of June 30, 2012 (In thousands)
Total
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
Money market and other
$
607,038

 
$
607,038

 
$
—

Marketable securities:
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury securities
91,438

 
88,014

 
3,424

U.S. Government agency securities
634,492

 
634,492

 
—

Municipal securities
66,543

 
—

 
66,543

Corporate debt securities
917,392

 
—

 
917,392

Sovereign securities
29,145

 
10,129

 
19,016

Equity securities
10

 
10

 
—

Total cash equivalents and marketable securities(1)
2,346,058

 
1,339,683

 
1,006,375

Other current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative assets
1,407

 
—

 
1,407

Other non-current assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Executive Deferred Savings Plan:

 

 

Money market and other
732

 
732

 
—

Mutual funds
124,622

 
94,572

 
30,050

Executive Deferred Savings Plan total
125,354

 
95,304

 
30,050

Total financial assets(1)
$
2,472,819

 
$
1,434,987

 
$
1,037,832

Other current liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative liabilities
$
(1,909
)
 
$
—

 
$
(1,909
)
Executive Deferred Savings Plan:
 
 
 
 
 
Money market and other
(12,825
)
 
(12,825
)
 
—

Mutual funds
(112,504
)
 
(81,974
)
 
(30,530
)
Executive Deferred Savings Plan total
$
(125,329
)
 
$
(94,799
)
 
$
(30,530
)
Total financial liabilities
$
(127,238
)
 
$
(94,799
)
 
$
(32,439
)
________________
(1) Excludes cash of $126.0 million held in operating accounts and time deposits of $62.4 million as of June 30, 2012.
There were no transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013. The Company did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis within Level 3 fair value measurements as of March 31, 2013 or June 30, 2012.



11
Table of Contents


NOTE 3 – BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
(In thousands)
As of
March 31, 2013
 
As of
June 30, 2012
Accounts receivable, net:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable, gross
$
476,490

 
$
723,607

Allowance for doubtful accounts
(22,266
)
 
(22,327
)
 
$
454,224

 
$
701,280

Inventories:
 
 
 
Customer service parts
$
193,540

 
$
197,013

Raw materials
229,015

 
234,549

Work-in-process
172,920

 
170,254

Finished goods
54,347

 
48,986

 
$
649,822

 
$
650,802

Other current assets:
 
 
 
Prepaid expenses
$
40,611

 
$
53,472

Prepaid income taxes
39,646

 
22,943

Other current assets
20,922

 
16,432

 
$
101,179

 
$
92,847

Land, property and equipment, net:
 
 
 
Land
$
41,883

 
$
41,397

Buildings and leasehold improvements
254,724

 
244,807

Machinery and equipment
470,950

 
443,668

Office furniture and fixtures
21,428

 
19,493

Construction-in-process
26,169

 
11,765

 
815,154

 
761,130

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
(516,537
)
 
(483,444
)
 
$
298,617

 
$
277,686

Other non-current assets:
 
 
 
Executive Deferred Savings Plan(1)
$
137,884

 
$
125,354

Deferred tax assets – long-term
109,963

 
128,738

Other
18,553

 
21,135

 
$
266,400

 
$
275,227

Other current liabilities:
 
 
 
Warranty
$
41,056

 
$
46,496

Executive Deferred Savings Plan(1)
138,701

 
125,329

Compensation and benefits
167,899

 
175,007

Income taxes payable
9,533

 
11,251

Interest payable
21,706

 
8,769

Accrued litigation costs
1,883

 
1,080

Other accrued expenses
130,910

 
145,479

 
$
511,688

 
$
513,411


12
Table of Contents

________________
(1)
KLA-Tencor has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan whereby certain executives and non-employee directors may defer a portion of their compensation. Participants are credited with returns based on their allocation of their account balances among measurement funds. The Company controls the investment of these funds, and the participants remain general creditors of KLA-Tencor. Distributions from the plan commence the quarter following a participant’s retirement or termination of employment, except in cases where such distributions are required to be delayed in order to avoid a prohibited distribution under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had a deferred compensation plan related asset and liability included as a component of other non-current assets and other current liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
NOTE 4 – MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of marketable securities as of the dates indicated below were as follows:
As of March 31, 2013 (In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
U.S. Treasury securities
$
98,853

 
$
169

 
$
(1
)
 
$
99,021

U.S. Government agency securities
658,805

 
1,028

 
(6
)
 
659,827

Municipal securities
82,663

 
128

 
(62
)
 
82,729

Corporate debt securities
1,065,519

 
4,322

 
(321
)
 
1,069,520

Money market and other
735,000

 
—

 
—

 
735,000

Sovereign securities
23,814

 
45

 
(7
)
 
23,852

Subtotal
2,664,654

 
5,692

 
(397
)
 
2,669,949

Add: Time deposits(1)
53,500

 
—

 
—

 
53,500

Less: Cash equivalents
778,147

 
—

 
—

 
778,147

Marketable securities
$
1,940,007

 
$
5,692

 
$
(397
)
 
$
1,945,302

As of June 30, 2012 (In thousands)
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 
Fair
Value
U.S. Treasury securities
$
91,387

 
$
67

 
$
(16
)
 
$
91,438

U.S. Government agency securities
633,587

 
981

 
(76
)
 
634,492

Municipal securities
66,538

 
107

 
(102
)
 
66,543

Corporate debt securities
914,134

 
3,826

 
(568
)
 
917,392

Money market and other
607,038

 
—

 
—

 
607,038

Sovereign securities
29,056

 
89

 
—

 
29,145

Equity securities
10

 
—

 
—

 
10

Subtotal
2,341,750

 
5,070

 
(762
)
 
2,346,058

Add: Time deposits(1)
62,431

 
—

 
—

 
62,431

Less: Cash equivalents
625,339

 
—

 
—

 
625,339

Marketable securities
$
1,778,842

 
$
5,070

 
$
(762
)
 
$
1,783,150

________________
(1)
Time deposits excluded from fair value measurements.

13
Table of Contents

KLA-Tencor’s investment portfolio consists of both corporate and government securities that have a maximum maturity of three years. The longer the duration of these securities, the more susceptible they are to changes in market interest rates and bond yields. As yields increase, those securities with a lower yield-at-cost show a mark-to-market unrealized loss. All unrealized losses are due to changes in market interest rates, bond yields and/or credit ratings. The Company has the ability to realize the full value of all of these investments upon maturity. The following table summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses of the Company’s investments that were in an unrealized loss position as of the date indicated below:
 
As of March 31, 2013 (In thousands)
Fair Value
 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses(1)
U.S. Treasury securities
$
1,996

 
$
(1
)
U.S. Government agency securities
63,513

 
(6
)
Municipal securities
29,376

 
(62
)
Corporate debt securities
232,589

 
(321
)
Sovereign securities
7,589

 
(7
)
Total
$
335,063

 
$
(397
)
__________________ 
(1)
Of the total gross unrealized losses, there were no amounts that, as of March 31, 2013, had been in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more.

The contractual maturities of securities classified as available-for-sale, regardless of their classification on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, as of the date indicated below were as follows:
As of March 31, 2013 (In thousands)
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
Due within one year
$
456,433

 
$
457,332

Due after one year through three years
1,483,574

 
1,487,970

 
$
1,940,007

 
$
1,945,302

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Net realized gains on the Company's investments for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 were $0.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Net realized gains on the Company's investments for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $2.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
NOTE 5 – GOODWILL AND PURCHASED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The following table presents goodwill balances as of the dates indicated below:
(In thousands)
As of
March 31, 2013
 
As of
June 30, 2012
Gross goodwill balance
$
604,362

 
$
604,302

Accumulated impairment losses
(277,570
)
 
(276,586
)
Net goodwill balance
$
326,792

 
$
327,716

The changes in the gross goodwill balance since June 30, 2012 resulted from foreign currency translation adjustments.

14
Table of Contents

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in each business combination. In September 2011, the FASB amended its guidance to simplify testing goodwill for impairment, allowing an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test.
The Company performed a qualitative assessment of the goodwill by reporting unit as of November 30, 2012 during the three months ended December 31, 2012 and concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded its carrying amount. As of December 31, 2012, the Company's assessment indicated that goodwill in the reporting units was not impaired. There have been no significant events or circumstances affecting the valuation of goodwill subsequent to the qualitative assessment performed in the second quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013. The next annual assessment of the goodwill by reporting unit will be performed in the second quarter of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014.
Purchased Intangible Assets
The components of purchased intangible assets as of the dates indicated below were as follows:
(In thousands)
 
 
As of
March 31, 2013
 
As of
June 30, 2012
Category
Range of
Useful Lives
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
and
Impairment
 
Net
Amount
 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
and
Impairment
 
Net
Amount
Existing technology
4-7 years
 
$
133,659

 
$
117,236

 
$
16,423

 
$
134,561

 
$
110,370

 
$
24,191

Patents
6-13 years
 
57,648

 
50,232

 
7,416

 
57,648

 
46,966

 
10,682

Trade name/Trademark
4-10 years
 
19,893

 
15,553

 
4,340

 
19,893

 
14,428

 
5,465

Customer relationships
6-7 years
 
54,680

 
43,851

 
10,829

 
54,823

 
39,525

 
15,298

Other
0-1 year
 
16,200

 
16,200

 
—

 
16,200

 
16,200

 
—

Total
 
 
$
282,080

 
$
243,072

 
$
39,008

 
$
283,125

 
$
227,489

 
$
55,636

Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, amortization expense for other intangible assets was $4.5 million and $7.3 million, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, amortization expense for other intangible assets was $16.3 million and $23.0 million, respectively. Based on the intangible assets recorded as of March 31, 2013, and assuming no subsequent additions to, or impairment of, the underlying assets, the remaining estimated amortization expense is expected to be as follows:
Fiscal year ending June 30:
Amortization
(In thousands)
2013 (remaining 3 months)
$
4,493

2014
15,368

2015
12,752

2016
5,564

2017
806

2018 and thereafter
25

Total
$
39,008


15
Table of Contents


NOTE 6 – LONG-TERM DEBT
In April 2008, the Company issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of 6.90% senior, unsecured long-term debt due in 2018 with an effective interest rate of 7.00%. The discount on the debt amounted to $5.4 million and is being amortized over the life of the debt using the straight-line method as opposed to the interest method due to immateriality. Interest is payable semi-annually on November 1 and May 1. The debt indenture includes covenants that limit the Company’s ability to grant liens on its facilities and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions, subject to significant allowances under which certain sale and leaseback transactions are not restricted. The Company was in compliance with all of its covenants as of March 31, 2013.
In certain circumstances involving a change of control followed by a downgrade of the rating of the Company’s senior notes, the Company will be required to make an offer to repurchase the senior notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company’s ability to repurchase the senior notes in such event may be limited by law, by the indenture associated with the senior notes, by the Company’s then-available financial resources or by the terms of other agreements to which the Company may be party at such time. If the Company fails to repurchase the senior notes as required by the indenture, it would constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the senior notes which, in turn, may also constitute an event of default under other obligations.
Based on the trading prices of the debt on the applicable dates, the fair value of the debt as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012 was $898.6 million and $902.2 million, respectively. While the debt is recorded at cost, the fair value of the long-term debt was determined based on quoted prices in markets that are not active; accordingly, the long-term debt is categorized as Level 2 for purposes of the fair value measurement hierarchy.
NOTE 7 – EQUITY AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS
Equity Incentive Program
Under the Company’s current equity incentive program, the Company issues equity awards from its 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”), which provides for the grant of options to purchase shares of its common stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and deferred stock units to its employees, consultants and members of its Board of Directors. The 2004 Plan permits the issuance of up to 32.0 million shares of common stock. Any 2004 Plan awards of restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units or deferred stock units with a per share or unit purchase price lower than 100% of fair market value on the grant date are counted against the total number of shares issuable under the 2004 Plan as 1.8 shares for every one share subject thereto.
The following table summarizes the combined activity under the Company's equity incentive plans for the indicated period:
(In thousands)
Available
For Grant
Balances as of June 30, 2012(1)
7,969

Restricted stock units granted(2)(3)
(1,899
)
Restricted stock units canceled(2)
346

Options canceled/expired/forfeited
191

Plan shares expired(4)
(40
)
Balances as of March 31, 2013(1)
6,567

__________________ 
(1)
Includes shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan, as well as under the Company’s 1998 Outside Director Option Plan (the “Outside Director Plan”), which only permits the issuance of stock options to the Company’s non-employee members of the Board of Directors. As of March 31, 2013, 1.7 million shares were available for grant under the Outside Director Plan.
(2)
The number of restricted stock units provided in this row reflects the application of the 1.8x multiple described above.
(3)
Includes 0.3 million restricted stock units (reflected as 0.6 million shares in this table due to the application of the 1.8x multiple described above) granted to senior management during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 with performance-based vesting criteria (in addition to service-based vesting criteria for any of such restricted stock units that are deemed to have been earned). As of March 31, 2013, it had not yet been determined the extent to which (if at all) the performance-based vesting criteria of such restricted stock units had been satisfied. Therefore, this line item includes all

16
Table of Contents

such performance-based restricted stock units, reported at the maximum possible number of shares that may ultimately be issuable under such restricted stock units if all applicable performance-based criteria are achieved at their maximum and all applicable service-based criteria are fully satisfied.
(4)
Represents the portion of shares listed as “Options canceled/expired/forfeited” above that were issued under the Company’s equity incentive plans other than the 2004 Plan or the Outside Director Plan. Because the Company is only currently authorized to issue equity awards under the 2004 Plan and the Outside Director Plan, any equity awards that are canceled, expire or are forfeited under any other Company equity incentive plans do not result in additional shares being available to the Company for future grant.
Except for stock options granted to non-employee Board members as part of their regular compensation package for service through the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Company has granted only restricted stock units under its equity incentive program since September 2006. For the preceding several years until September 30, 2006, stock options were granted at the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant (except for the previously disclosed retroactively priced options which were granted primarily prior to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002), generally with a vesting period of five years and an exercise period not to exceed seven years (ten years for options granted prior to July 1, 2005) from the date of issuance. Restricted stock units may be granted with varying criteria such as service-based and/or performance-based vesting.
The fair value of stock-based awards is measured at the grant date and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The fair value is determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model for purchase rights under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan and using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date for restricted stock units, adjusted to exclude the present value of dividends which are not accrued on the restricted stock units.
The following table shows pre-tax stock-based compensation expense for the indicated periods: 
 
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
(In thousands)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Stock-based compensation expense by:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Costs of revenues
$
2,912

 
$
3,194

 
$
8,811

 
$
10,703

Engineering, research and development
5,068

 
4,995

 
14,801

 
16,572

Selling, general and administrative
10,556

 
12,725

 
28,866

 
33,781

Total stock-based compensation expense
$
18,536

 
$
20,914

 
$
52,478

 
$
61,056

The following table shows stock-based compensation capitalized as inventory as of the dates indicated below: 
(In thousands)
As of
March 31, 2013
 
As of
June 30, 2012
Inventory
$
8,096

 
$
7,692

Stock Options
The following table summarizes the activity and weighted-average exercise price for stock options under all plans during the nine months ended March 31, 2013: 
Stock Options
Shares
(In thousands)
 
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding stock options as of June 30, 2012
3,844

 
$
47.36

Granted
—

 
$
—

Exercised
(1,653
)
 
$
45.61

Canceled/expired/forfeited
(191
)
 
$
48.33

Outstanding stock options as of March 31, 2013 (all outstanding and all vested and exercisable)
2,000

 
$
48.72

The Company has not issued any stock options since November 1, 2007. The weighted-average remaining contractual terms for total options outstanding under all plans, and for total options vested and exercisable under all plans, as of March 31, 2013 were each 1.0 year. The aggregate intrinsic values for total options outstanding under all plans, and for total options vested and exercisable under all plans, as of March 31, 2013 were each $10.9 million.

17
Table of Contents

The authoritative guidance on stock-based compensation permits companies to select the option-pricing model used to estimate the fair value of their stock-based compensation awards. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of assumptions, including the option’s expected term and the expected price volatility of the underlying stock. For purposes of the fair value estimates presented in this report, the Company has based its expected stock price volatility assumption on the market-based implied volatility from traded options of the Company’s common stock. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had no unrecognized stock-based compensation balance related to stock options.
The following table shows the total intrinsic value of options exercised, total cash received from employees and non-employee Board members as a result of stock option exercises and tax benefits realized by the Company in connection with these stock option exercises for the indicated periods: 
 
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
(In thousands)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Total intrinsic value of options exercised
$
8,462

 
$
13,690

 
$
13,236

 
$
20,259

Total cash received from employees and non-employee Board members as a result of stock option exercises
$
48,685

 
$
74,640

 
$
75,403

 
$
104,543

Tax benefits realized by the Company in connection with these exercises
$
2,872

 
$
4,619

 
$
4,451

 
$
6,782

The Company generally settles employee stock option exercises with newly issued common shares, except in certain tax jurisdictions where settling such exercises with treasury shares provides the Company or one of its subsidiaries with a tax benefit.
Restricted Stock Units
The following table shows the applicable number of restricted stock units and weighted-average grant date fair value for restricted stock units granted, vested and released, withheld for taxes, and forfeited during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and restricted stock units outstanding as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012: 
Restricted Stock Units
Shares
(In thousands) (1)
 
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding restricted stock units as of June 30, 2012
6,418

 
$
29.49

Granted(2)
1,055

 
$
47.71

Vested and released
(1,231
)
 
$
24.95

Withheld for taxes
(584
)
 
$
24.95

Forfeited
(192
)
 
$
32.46

Outstanding restricted stock units as of March 31, 2013(2)
5,466

 
$
33.56

__________________ 
(1)
Share numbers reflect actual shares subject to awarded restricted stock units. Under the terms of the 2004 Plan, each of the share numbers presented in this column is multiplied by 1.8 to calculate the impact on the share reserve under the 2004 Plan.
(2)
Includes 0.3 million restricted stock units granted to senior management during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 with performance-based vesting criteria (in addition to service-based vesting criteria for any of such restricted stock units that are deemed to have been earned). As of March 31, 2013, it had not yet been determined the extent to which (if at all) the performance-based vesting criteria of such restricted stock units had been satisfied. Therefore, this line item includes all such performance-based restricted stock units, reported at the maximum possible number of shares that may ultimately be issuable under such restricted stock units if all applicable performance-based criteria are achieved at their maximum and all applicable service-based criteria are fully satisfied.

18
Table of Contents

The restricted stock units granted by the Company since the beginning of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 generally vest (a) with respect to awards with only service-based vesting criteria, in four equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date and (b) with respect to awards with both performance-based and service-based vesting criteria, in two equal installments on the third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, in each case subject to the recipient remaining employed by the Company as of the applicable vesting date. The restricted stock units granted by the Company from the beginning of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 through June 30, 2012 generally vest in two equal installments on the second and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the recipient remaining employed by the Company as of the applicable vesting date. The fair value is determined using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date for restricted stock units, adjusted to exclude the present value of dividends which are not accrued on the restricted stock units. The restricted stock units have been awarded under the 2004 Plan, and each unit will entitle the recipient to one share of common stock when the applicable vesting requirements for that unit are satisfied. However, for each share actually issued under the awarded restricted stock units, the share reserve under the 2004 Plan will be reduced by 1.8 shares, as provided under the terms of the 2004 Plan.
The following table shows the weighted-average grant date fair value per unit for the restricted stock units granted and the tax benefits realized by the Company in connection with vested and released restricted stock units for the indicated periods: 
(In thousands, except for weighted-average grant date fair value)
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Weighted-average grant date fair value per unit
$
51.95

 
$
51.32

 
$
47.71

 
$
36.39

Tax benefits realized by the Company in connection with vested and released restricted stock units
$
747

 
$
326

 
$
28,771

 
$
28,562

As of March 31, 2013, the unrecognized stock-based compensation expense balance related to restricted stock units was $114.9 million, excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures, and will be recognized over a weighted-average remaining contractual term and an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 1.4 years. The intrinsic value of outstanding restricted stock units as of March 31, 2013 was $288.3 million.
Cash-Based Long-Term Incentive Compensation
The Company has adopted a cash-based long-term incentive program in fiscal year 2013 for many of its employees as part of the Company's employee compensation program. During the nine months ended March 31, 2013, the Company approved cash-based long-term incentive (“Cash LTI”) awards of $61.5 million under the Company's Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Cash LTI Plan”). Cash LTI awards issued to employees under the Cash LTI Plan will vest in four equal installments, with 25% of the aggregate amount of the Cash LTI award vesting on each yearly anniversary of the grant date over a four-year period. In order to receive payments under the Cash LTI Plan, participants must remain employed by the Company as of the applicable award vesting date. Executives and non-employee Board members are not participating in this program. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013, the Company recognized $3.6 million and $7.1 million, respectively, in compensation expense under the Cash LTI Plan. As of March 31, 2013, the unrecognized compensation balance related to the Cash LTI Plan was $53.9 million, excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
KLA-Tencor’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) provides that eligible employees may contribute up to 10% of their eligible earnings toward the semi-annual purchase of KLA-Tencor’s common stock. The ESPP is qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The employee’s purchase price is derived from a formula based on the closing price of the common stock on the first day of the offering period versus the closing price on the date of purchase (or, if not a trading day, on the immediately preceding trading day).
Effective January 1, 2010, the offering period (or length of the look-back period) under the ESPP has a duration of six months, and the purchase price with respect to each offering period beginning on or after such date is, until otherwise amended, equal to 85% of the lesser of (i) the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the commencement of the applicable six-month offering period or (ii) the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the purchase date.

19
Table of Contents

The Company estimates the fair value of purchase rights under the ESPP using a Black-Scholes valuation model. The fair value of each purchase right under the ESPP was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the straight-line attribution approach with the following weighted-average assumptions: 
 
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Stock purchase plan:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expected stock price volatility
27.5
%
 
39.3
%
 
28.9
%
 
36.0
%
Risk-free interest rate
0.1
%
 
0.1
%
 
0.1
%
 
0.1
%
Dividend yield
3.2
%
 
3.0
%
 
3.3
%
 
3.2
%
Expected life of options (in years)
0.5

 
0.5

 
0.5

 
0.5

 The following table shows total cash received from employees for the issuance of shares under the ESPP, the number of shares purchased by employees through the ESPP, the tax benefits realized by the Company in connection with the disqualifying dispositions of shares purchased under the ESPP and the weighted-average fair value per share for the indicated periods: 
(In thousands, except for weighted-average fair value per share)
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Total cash received from employees for the issuance of shares under the ESPP
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
20,139

 
$
19,195

Number of shares purchased by employees through the ESPP
—

 
—

 
496

 
545

Tax benefits realized by the Company in connection with the disqualifying dispositions of shares purchased under the ESPP
$
724

 
$
1,289

 
$
1,398

 
$
2,132

Weighted-average fair value per share based on Black-Scholes model
$
10.36

 
$
11.26

 
$
10.46

 
$
10.07

The ESPP shares are replenished annually on the first day of each fiscal year by virtue of an evergreen provision. The provision allows for share replenishment equal to the lesser of 2.0 million shares or the number of shares which KLA-Tencor estimates will be required to be issued under the ESPP during the forthcoming fiscal year. As of March 31, 2013, a total of 2.1 million shares were reserved and available for issuance under the ESPP. As of the date of this report, no additional shares have been added to the ESPP with respect to the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013.
NOTE 8 – STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
Since July 1997, the Board of Directors has authorized the Company to systematically repurchase in the open market up to 80.8 million shares of its common stock under a repurchase program, including 8.0 million shares authorized in November 2012. The intent of this program is to offset the dilution from KLA-Tencor’s equity incentive plans and employee stock purchase plan, as well as to return excess cash to the Company’s stockholders. Subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors, the repurchases will be made from time to time in the open market in compliance with applicable securities laws, including the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder, such as Rule 10b-18. As of March 31, 2013, 7.1 million shares were available for repurchase under the Company’s repurchase program.
Share repurchases for the indicated periods (based on the settlement date of the applicable repurchase) were as follows:
 
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
(In thousands)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Number of shares of common stock repurchased
1,289

 
1,341

 
4,115

 
4,510

Total cost of repurchases
$
68,343

 
$
66,934

 
$
204,943

 
$
196,906


NOTE 9 – NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated by using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, increased to include the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if the shares of common stock underlying the Company’s outstanding dilutive stock options and restricted stock units had been issued. The dilutive effect of outstanding options and

20
Table of Contents

restricted stock units is reflected in diluted net income per share by application of the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that is to be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the award becomes deductible are assumed to be used to repurchase shares. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
$
166,382

 
$
205,346

 
$
408,379

 
$
508,138

Denominator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average shares-basic, excluding unvested restricted stock units
166,234

 
167,070

 
166,297

 
166,748

Effect of dilutive options and restricted stock units
2,946

 
3,076

 
3,128

 
3,275

Weighted-average shares-diluted
169,180

 
170,146

 
169,425

 
170,023

Basic net income per share
$
1.00

 
$
1.23

 
$
2.46

 
$
3.05

Diluted net income per share
$
0.98

 
$
1.21

 
$
2.41

 
$
2.99

Anti-dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share
967

 
1,906

 
1,556

 
4,024

The total amount of dividends paid during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $66.6 million and $58.5 million, respectively. The total amount of dividends paid during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $199.7 million and $175.1 million, respectively.
NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES
The following table provides details of income taxes:
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Three months ended March 31,
 
Nine months ended March 31,
 
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Income before income taxes
$
192,115

 
$
274,033

 
$
513,531

 
$
668,202

Provision for income taxes
$
25,733

 
$
68,687

 
$
105,152

 
$
160,064

Effective tax rate
13.4
%
 
25.1
%
 
20.5
%
 
24.0
%
The Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 is approximately 21.0%.
The difference between the actual effective tax rate of 13.4% during the quarter and the estimated annual effective tax rate of 21.0% is primarily due to a decrease in tax expense of $14.4 million as a result of the reinstatement of the U.S. federal research credit during the three months ended March 31, 2013. On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law, which reinstated the research credit retroactive to January 1, 2012 and extended the credit through December 31, 2013, enabling the Company to recognize a retroactive tax credit for prior periods during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Tax expense was lower as a percentage of income during the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012 primarily due to the impact of the following items:
•
Tax expense was decreased by $15.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013 due to the reinstatement of the federal research credit; and
•
Tax expense was increased by $5.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012 related to shortfalls from employee stock activity.
Tax expense was lower as a percentage of income during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2012 primarily due to the impact of the following items:
•
Tax expense was decreased by $10.2 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 due to the reinstatement of the federal research credit;
•
Tax expense was increased by $6.7 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 due to a decrease in the proportion of the Company's earnings generated in jurisdictions with tax rates lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate;

21
Table of Contents

•
Tax expense was increased by $10.9 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 related to shortfalls from employee stock activity;
•
Tax expense was decreased by $3.7 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 related to a non-taxable increase in the value of the assets held within the Company's Executive Deferred Savings Plan. The Company incurred a tax benefit of $4.7 million due to a non-taxable increase in the value of the assets held within that plan during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 compared to a tax benefit of $1.0 million due to a non-taxable increase in the value of the assets held within the plan during the nine months ended March 31, 2012;
•
Tax expense was increased by $7.7 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 due to a decrease in the domestic manufacturing deduction as a result of a change in the timing of when revenue is recognized for federal income tax purposes;
•
Tax expense was decreased by $18.3 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 resulting from a decrease in the Company's unrecognized tax benefits due to the settlement of a U.S. federal income tax examination;
•
Tax expense was decreased by $18.0 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 resulting from a decrease in reserves for uncertain tax positions taken in prior years; and
•
Tax expense was increased by $23.6 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 related to a migration of a portion of the Company's manufacturing to Singapore.
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by tax authorities throughout the world. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax examination for all years beginning from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.  The Company is subject to state income tax examinations for all years beginning from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. The Company is also subject to examinations in other major foreign jurisdictions, including Singapore, for all years beginning from the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. It is possible that certain examinations may be concluded in the next twelve months. The Company believes it is possible that it may recognize up to $6.9 million of its existing unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months as a result of the lapse of statutes of limitations and the resolution of examinations with various tax authorities.
NOTE 11 – LITIGATION AND OTHER LEGAL MATTERS
The Company is named from time to time as a party to lawsuits and other types of legal proceedings and claims in the normal course of its business. Actions filed against the Company include commercial, intellectual property, customer, and labor and employment related claims, including complaints of alleged wrongful termination and potential class action lawsuits regarding alleged violations of federal and state wage and hour and other laws. In general, legal proceedings and claims regardless of their merit, and associated internal investigations (especially those relating to intellectual property or confidential information disputes), are often expensive to prosecute, defend or conduct and may divert management's attention and other company resources. Moreover, the results of legal proceedings are difficult to predict, and the costs incurred in litigation can be substantial, regardless of outcome. The Company believes the amounts provided in its condensed consolidated financial statements are adequate in light of the probable and estimated liabilities. However, because such matters are subject to many uncertainties, the ultimate outcomes are not predictable, and there can be no assurances that the actual amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities from the matters described above will not exceed the amounts reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements or will not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Factoring. KLA-Tencor has agreements (referred to as “factoring agreements”) with financial institutions to sell certain of its trade receivables and promissory notes from customers without recourse. The Company does not believe it is at risk for any material losses as a result of these agreements. In addition, the Company periodically sells certain letters of credit (“LCs”), without recourse, received from customers in payment for goods.
The following table shows total receivables sold under factoring agreements and proceeds from sales of LCs for the indicated periods:
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
Nine months ended March 31,
(In thousands)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Receivables sold under factoring agreements
$
44,400

 
$
71,897

 
$
129,960

 
$
322,227

Proceeds from sales of LCs
$
3,804

 
$
9,500

 
$
3,804

 
$
14,010

Factoring and LC fees for the sale of certain trade receivables were recorded in interest income and other, net and were not material for the periods presented.

22
Table of Contents


Facilities. KLA-Tencor leases certain of its facilities under arrangements that are accounted for as operating leases. Rent expense was $2.4 million and $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Rent expense was $7.0 million and $6.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The following is a schedule of expected operating lease payments:
Fiscal year ending June 30,
Amount
(In thousands)
2013 (remaining 3 months)
$
2,090

2014
7,114

2015
4,691

2016
3,581

2017
3,029

2018 and thereafter
2,668

Total minimum lease payments
$
23,173

Purchase Commitments. KLA-Tencor maintains certain open inventory purchase commitments with its suppliers to ensure a smooth and continuous supply for key components. The Company’s liability under these purchase commitments is generally restricted to a forecasted time-horizon as mutually agreed upon between the parties. This forecasted time-horizon can vary among different suppliers. The Company’s open inventory purchase commitments were approximately $232.7 million as of March 31, 2013 and are primarily due within the next 12 months. Actual expenditures will vary based upon the volume of the transactions and length of contractual service provided. In addition, the amounts paid under these arrangements may be less in the event that the arrangements are renegotiated or canceled. Certain agreements provide for potential cancellation penalties.
Cash Long-Term Incentive Plan. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had committed $61.5 million to future payment obligations under its Cash LTI Plan. The calculation of compensation expense related to the Cash LTI Plan includes estimated forfeiture rate assumptions. Cash LTI awards issued to employees under the Cash LTI Plan will vest in four equal installments, with 25% of the aggregate amount of the Cash LTI award vesting on each yearly anniversary of the grant date over a four-year period. In order to receive payments under the Cash LTI Plan, participants must remain employed by the Company as of the applicable award vesting date.
Guarantees. KLA-Tencor provides standard warranty coverage on its systems for 40 hours per week for 12 months, providing labor and parts necessary to repair the systems during the warranty period. The Company accounts for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to costs of revenues when revenue is recognized. The estimated warranty cost is based on historical product performance and field expenses. Utilizing actual service records, the Company calculates the average service hours and parts expense per system and applies the actual labor and overhead rates to determine the estimated warranty charge. The Company updates these estimated charges on a quarterly basis. The actual product performance and/or field expense profiles may differ, and in those cases the Company adjusts its warranty accruals accordingly.
The following table provides the changes in the product warranty accrual for the indicated periods:
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
Nine months ended March 31,
(In thousands)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Beginning balance
$
41,918

 
$
43,476

 
$
46,496

 
$
41,528

Accruals for warranties issued during the period
11,539

 
13,615

 
32,047

 
35,017

Changes in liability related to pre-existing warranties
1,167

 
796

 
2,899

 
3,726

Settlements made during the period
(13,568
)
 
(12,677
)
 
(40,386
)
 
(35,061
)
Ending balance
$
41,056

 
$
45,210

 
$
41,056

 
$
45,210

The Company maintains guarantee arrangements available through various financial institutions for up to $24.5 million, of which $22.5 million had been issued as of March 31, 2013, primarily to fund guarantees to customs authorities for value-added tax (“VAT”) and other operating requirements of the Company’s subsidiaries in Europe and Asia.

23
Table of Contents

KLA-Tencor is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which it may be obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain matters. Typically, these obligations arise in connection with contracts and license agreements or the sale of assets, under which the Company customarily agrees to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from, or provides customers with other remedies to protect against, bodily injury or damage to personal property caused by the Company's products, non-compliance with the Company's product performance specifications, infringement by the Company's products of third-party intellectual property rights and a breach of warranties, representations and covenants related to such matters as title to assets sold, validity of certain intellectual property rights, non-infringement of third-party rights, and certain income tax-related matters. In each of these circumstances, payment by the Company is typically subject to the other party making a claim to and cooperating with the Company pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract. This usually allows the Company to challenge the other party's claims or, in case of breach of intellectual property representations or covenants, to control the defense or settlement of any third-party claims brought against the other party. Further, the Company's obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of amounts, activity (typically at the Company's option to replace or correct the products or terminate the agreement with a refund to the other party), and duration. In some instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties and/or insurance covering certain payments made by the Company.
Subject to certain limitations, the Company is obligated to indemnify its current and former directors, officers and employees with respect to certain litigation matters and investigations that arise in connection with their service to the Company. These obligations arise under the terms of the Company's certificate of incorporation, its bylaws, applicable contracts, and Delaware and California law. The obligation to indemnify generally means that the Company is required to pay or reimburse the individuals' reasonable legal expenses and possibly damages and other liabilities incurred in connection with these matters.
It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these or similar agreements due to the conditional nature of the Company's obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the Company under these agreements have not had a material effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 13 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The authoritative guidance requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments and hedging activities, including foreign currency exchange contracts, as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge treatment, as well as the ineffective portion of any hedges, are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. In accordance with the guidance, the Company designates foreign currency forward exchange and option contracts as cash flow hedges of certain forecasted foreign currency denominated sales and purchase transactions.
KLA-Tencor’s foreign subsidiaries operate and sell KLA-Tencor’s products in various global markets. As a result, KLA-Tencor is exposed to risks relating to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. KLA-Tencor utilizes foreign currency forward exchange contracts and option contracts to hedge against future movements in foreign exchange rates that affect certain existing and forecasted foreign currency denominated sales and purchase transactions, such as the Japanese yen, the euro and the Israeli new shekel. The Company routinely hedges its exposures to certain foreign currencies with various financial institutions in an effort to minimize the impact of certain currency exchange rate fluctuations. These currency forward exchange contracts and options, designated as cash flow hedges, generally have maturities of less than 18 months. Cash flow hedges are evaluated for effectiveness monthly, based on changes in total fair value of the derivatives. If a financial counterparty to any of the Company’s hedging arrangements experiences financial difficulties or is otherwise unable to honor the terms of the foreign currency hedge, the Company may experience material losses.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gains or losses on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of currency forward exchange and option contracts due to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.
For derivative instruments that are not designated as accounting hedges, gains and losses are recognized in interest income and other, net. The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. The gains and losses on these derivatives are largely offset by the changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.

24
Table of Contents

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: Foreign Exchange Contracts
The locations and amounts of designated and non-designated derivative instruments’ gains and losses reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the indicated periods were as follows:
 
 
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
(In thousands)
Location in Financial Statements
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gains in accumulated OCI on derivatives (effective portion)
Accumulated OCI
$
842

 
$
2,269

 
$
2,843

 
$
852

Gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion):
Revenues
$
720

 
$
122

 
$
146

 
$
(851
)
 
Costs of revenues
128

 
(220
)
 
(262
)
 
(172
)
 
Total gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (effective portion)
$
848

 
$
(98
)
 
$
(116
)
 
$
(1,023
)
Gains recognized in income on derivatives (ineffectiveness portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)
Interest income and other, net
$
61

 
$
77

 
$
73

 
$
175

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gains (losses) recognized in income
Interest income and other, net
$
4,514

 
$
5,605

 
$
14,408

 
$
(6,205
)
The U.S. dollar equivalent of all outstanding notional amounts of hedge contracts, with maximum maturity of 13 months, as of the dates indicated below was as follows: 
(In thousands)
As of
March 31, 2013
 
As of
June 30, 2012
Cash flow hedge contracts
 
 
 
Purchase
$
14,026

 
$
14,689

Sell
$
66,166

 
$
29,362

Other foreign currency hedge contracts
 
 
 
Purchase
$
99,953

 
$
121,965

Sell
$
64,168

 
$
126,827


25
Table of Contents

The locations and fair value amounts of the Company’s derivative instruments reported in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the dates indicated below were as follows: 
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
As of
March 31, 2013
 
As of
June 30, 2012
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
As of
March 31, 2013
 
As of
June 30, 2012
(In thousands)
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts
Other current assets
 
$
1,620

 
$
128

 
Other current liabilities
 
$
689

 
$
736

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments
 
 
$
1,620

 
$
128

 
 
 
$
689

 
$
736

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts
Other current assets
 
$
2,842

 
$
1,279

 
Other current liabilities
 
$
1,150

 
$
1,173

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
 
 
$
2,842

 
$
1,279

 
 
 
$
1,150

 
$
1,173

Total derivatives
 
 
$
4,462

 
$
1,407

 
 
 
$
1,839

 
$
1,909

The following table provides the balances and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), before taxes, related to derivative instruments for the indicated periods:
 
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
(In thousands)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Beginning balance
$
2,003

 
$
(480
)
 
$
(962
)
 
$
12

Amount reclassified to income
(848
)
 
98

 
116

 
1,023

Net change
842

 
2,269

 
2,843

 
852

Ending balance
$
1,997

 
$
1,887

 
$
1,997

 
$
1,887

NOTE 14 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company purchased from, or sold to, several entities, where one or more executive officers of the Company or members of the Company’s Board of Directors, or their immediate family members, also serves as an executive officer or board member, including Cisco Systems, Inc., Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Avago Technologies Ltd. and SAP AG. The following table provides the transactions with these parties for the indicated periods (for the portion of such period that they were considered related):
 
Three months ended
March 31,
 
Nine months ended
March 31,
(In thousands)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Total revenues
$
840

 
$
3,287

 
$
5,611

 
$
3,412

Total purchases
$
1,178

 
$
2,351

 
$
3,630

 
$
6,622

The Company had a receivable balance from these parties of $0.7 million and $1.9 million as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively. Management believes that such transactions are at arm’s length and on similar terms as would have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
NOTE 15 – SEGMENT REPORTING AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
KLA-Tencor reports one reportable segment in accordance with the provisions of the authoritative guidance for segment reporting. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. KLA-Tencor’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer.

26
Table of Contents

The Company is engaged primarily in designing, manufacturing, and marketing process control and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and related nanoelectronics industries. All operating segments have been aggregated due to their inter-dependencies, commonality of long-term economic characteristics, products and services, the production processes, class of customer and distribution processes. The Company’s service products are an extension of the system product portfolio and provide customers with spare parts and fab management services (including system preventive maintenance and optimization services) to improve yield, increase production uptime and throughput, and lower the cost of ownership. Since the Company operates in one reportable segment, all financial segment information required by the authoritative guidance can be found in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s significant operations outside the United States include manufacturing facilities in Israel and Singapore, and sales, marketing and service offices in Western Europe, Japan and the Asia Pacific regions. For geographical revenue reporting, revenues are attributed to the geographic location in which the customer is located. Long-lived assets consist primarily of net property and equipment and are attributed to the geographic region in which they are located.
The following is a summary of revenues by geographic region, based on ship-to location, for the indicated periods (as a percentage of total revenues):
  
Three months ended March 31,
 
Nine months ended March 31,
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
2013
 
2012
 
2013
 
2012
Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
$
268,889

 
38
%
 
$
185,195

 
22
%
 
$
588,505

 
28
%
 
$
543,922

 
24
%
Taiwan
227,535

 
31
%
 
209,772

 
25
%
 
727,328

 
34
%
 
602,076

 
26
%
Japan
61,154

 
8
%