legacy_def14a.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Amendment No.
)
Filed by the
Registrant þ
|
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
|
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
o |
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Confidential,
for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Definitive Additional
Materials |
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section
240.14a-12 |
|
|
|
Legacy Reserves
LP |
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its
Charter) |
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement if other than the Registrant) |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the
appropriate box): |
þ |
|
No fee required. |
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange
Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction
applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction
applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials. |
o |
|
Check box if
any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form
or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Reserves LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas
79701
April 12, 2010
To Our Limited Partners:
You are cordially invited to attend
the 2010 Annual Meeting of Unitholders of Legacy Reserves LP to be held on May
12, 2010 commencing at 10:30 a.m. local time at the Midland Petroleum Club
located at 501 W. Wall, Midland, Texas 79701. Proxy materials, which include a
Notice of the Meeting, Proxy Statement and proxy card, are enclosed with this
letter. The attached proxy statement is first being mailed to unitholders of
Legacy Reserves LP on or about April 12, 2010. We have also enclosed our 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009.
The board of directors of our general partner has called this Annual
Meeting for you to consider and act upon the election of directors of our
general partner’s board of directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of
Unitholders. The current board of directors of our general partner unanimously
recommends that you approve this proposal.
Even if you plan to attend the meeting, you are requested to sign, date
and return the proxy card in the enclosed envelope. If you attend the meeting
after having returned the enclosed proxy card, you may revoke your proxy, if you
wish, and vote in person. A proxy may also be revoked at any time before it is
exercised by giving written notice to, or filing a duly exercised proxy bearing
a later date with, our Secretary. If you would like to attend and your units are
not registered in your own name, please ask the broker, trust, bank or other
nominee that holds the units to provide you with evidence of your unit
ownership.
We look forward to seeing you at the
meeting.
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
Cary D.
Brown Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board, Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, general
partner of Legacy Reserves LP
|
Legacy Reserves LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas
79701
_______________
NOTICE OF THE
2010
ANNUAL MEETING OF
UNITHOLDERS
_______________
The Annual Meeting of the Unitholders of Legacy Reserves LP, or the
Partnership, will be held on Wednesday, May 12, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. local time
at the Midland Petroleum Club located at 501 W.
Wall, Midland, Texas 79701 for the following purposes:
1. |
|
To elect seven (7)
directors to the board of directors of our general partner, each to serve
until the next Annual Meeting of Unitholders; and |
|
|
|
2. |
|
To transact any
other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any
adjournment thereof, including, without limitation, the adjournment of the
annual meeting in order to solicit additional votes from unitholders in
favor of adopting the foregoing proposal. |
Only unitholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2010, are
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment
or postponement thereof. A list of such unitholders will be open to examination,
during regular business hours, by any unitholder for at least ten days prior to
the Annual Meeting, at our offices at 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas
79701. Unitholders holding at least a majority of the outstanding units
representing limited partner interests are required to be present or represented
by proxy at the meeting to constitute a quorum.
Please note that space limitations make it necessary to limit attendance
at the meeting to unitholders, though each unitholder may be accompanied by one
guest. Admission to the meeting will be on a first-come, first-served basis.
Registration will begin at 9:30 a.m. Each unitholder may be asked to present
valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport.
Unitholders holding units in brokerage accounts must bring a copy of a brokerage
statement reflecting unit ownership as of the record date. Cameras, recording
devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the
meeting.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
Midland, Texas
April 12, 2010
|
Cary D.
Brown Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board, Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, general
partner of Legacy Reserves LP
|
YOUR VOTE IS
IMPORTANT
To ensure your
representation at the meeting, please sign, date and return your proxy as
promptly as possible. An envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in
the United States, is enclosed for this purpose. Mailing your completed proxy will ensure
your representation at the meeting, whether you attend or not. If you
do attend the meeting and prefer to vote in person, you may do so.
|
Proxy Statement for the
Annual Meeting of
Unitholders of
LEGACY RESERVES LP
To Be Held on Wednesday, May 12, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL
MEETING AND VOTING |
1 |
The Annual Meeting |
1 |
Voting and Proxy Procedures |
1 |
Quorum and Required Votes |
3 |
Additional Questions and
Information |
3 |
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
4 |
Board of Directors |
4 |
Voting |
4 |
Recommendation and Proxies |
4 |
Nominees for Election |
5 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
9 |
Management of Legacy Reserves
LP |
9 |
Board of Directors |
9 |
Director Independence |
9 |
Code of Ethics |
14 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
14 |
Introduction |
14 |
Corporate Governance |
15 |
Executive Officer Compensation Strategy and
Philosophy |
16 |
Components of Compensation |
16 |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT |
26 |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
26 |
Summary Compensation Table |
26 |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year
2009 |
28 |
Employment Agreements |
29 |
Benefits Payable Upon Termination or Change in
Control |
30 |
Option Exercises and Units Vested in
2009 |
33 |
Equity Compensation Plan
Information |
34 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
34 |
Director Compensation for the 2009 Fiscal
Year |
35 |
MANAGEMENT |
35 |
Executive Officers |
35 |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT |
37 |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
38 |
Distribution Upon Liquidation |
39 |
Transactions with Related
Persons |
39 |
Review, Approval and Ratification of
Transactions with Related Persons |
40 |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION |
40 |
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM |
41 |
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 |
42 |
OTHER MATTERS |
43 |
Required Vote |
43 |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance |
43 |
Unitholder Proposals |
43 |
Communications with Directors or the Board of
Directors |
43 |
Availability of Annual Report |
44 |
Legacy Reserves LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas
79701
_______________
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 12,
2010
_______________
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
AND VOTING
The Annual Meeting
Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “Partnership,” “Legacy,” “we,”
“our,” and “us” are used in this proxy statement to refer to Legacy Reserves LP
together with our subsidiaries. The terms “board” and “board of directors” refer
to our general partner’s board of directors.
What is a proxy statement and why is it
important?
We hold a meeting of unitholders annually. This year’s meeting will be
held on May 12, 2010. Our board of directors is seeking your proxy to vote at
the 2010 Annual Meeting of Unitholders. This proxy statement contains important
information about the Partnership and the election of directors to be voted on
at the meeting. Please read these materials carefully so that you have the
information you need to make informed decisions.
You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote. Instead, you may
simply complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card.
When and where is the Annual
Meeting?
The 2010 Annual Meeting of Unitholders of Legacy Reserves LP will be held
on Wednesday, May 12, 2010, at 10:30 a.m., local time, at the Midland Petroleum
Club located at 501 W. Wall, Midland, Texas 79701.
What am I being asked to vote
upon?
You are being asked to approve the election of the directors nominated to
our general partner’s board of directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting
of Unitholders, and to consider and vote upon such other business as may
properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements
thereof.
Voting and Proxy
Procedures
Who may vote at the Annual
Meeting?
Only unitholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2010, the
record date for the Annual Meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and to
participate in the Annual Meeting. If you were a unitholder of record on that
date, you will be entitled to vote all of the units representing limited partner
interests of Legacy Reserves LP, each referred to as a Unit, that you held on
that date at the Annual Meeting, or any postponements or adjournments of the
Annual Meeting. We are mailing this proxy statement to unitholders on or about
April 12, 2010.
IMPORTANT CHANGE:
If your units are held in the name of your broker, it is critical that you
instruct your broker how you wish to vote your units in the election of
directors. In the past, brokers had discretion to vote their customers’ units in
an election of directors, even when the customers had not provided the broker
with voting instructions. However, as of January 1, 2010, brokers are no longer
permitted to vote in the election of directors if the broker has not received
instructions from the beneficial owner of the units. As a result, it is
particularly important
that you instruct your broker how you wish to vote your units. If you do not
complete and return voting instructions to your broker, no votes will be cast on
your behalf when directors are elected. For more information on this topic, see
the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Alert issued in February 2010
entitled “New Shareholder Voting Rules for the 2010 Proxy Season” at
http://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/votingrules2010.htm.
What are the voting rights of the holders of
Units?
Each Unit is entitled to one vote on all matters. Your proxy card
indicates the number of units that you owned as of the record date.
Who is soliciting my
proxy?
Our general partner’s board of directors on behalf of the Partnership is
soliciting proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting.
What different methods can I use to
vote?
By Written Proxy.
Whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting or not, we urge you to complete,
sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope
provided. Returning the proxy card will not affect your right to attend the
Annual Meeting and vote in person.
If you properly fill in your proxy card and send it to us in time to
vote, your “proxy” (Steven H. Pruett or William M. Morris are the individuals
named as proxies on your proxy card) will vote your units as you have directed.
Unless otherwise directed in the proxy card, your proxy will vote your units for
the election of the seven director nominees proposed by our general partner’s
board of directors.
If any other matter is presented, it is the intention of the persons
named in the enclosed proxy card to vote proxies held by them in accordance with
their best judgment. At the time this proxy statement was first mailed to
unitholders, we knew of no matters that needed to be acted on at the Annual
Meeting other than those discussed in this proxy statement.
In Person. All
unitholders of record may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you plan to
attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, we will give you a ballot when you
arrive. However, if your units are held in the name of your broker, bank or
other nominee, you must bring an account statement or letter from the nominee
indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the units on the record
date.
How may I revoke my signed proxy
card?
You may revoke your proxy card or change your vote at any time before
your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting. You can do this in one of three
ways:
- First, you can send a written
notice in advance of the meeting to our Secretary at 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas 79701, stating
that you would like to revoke your proxy.
- Second, you can complete and
submit a later-dated proxy card.
- Third, you can attend the Annual
Meeting and vote in person. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not alone revoke your proxy unless you
vote at the meeting as described below.
If you have instructed a broker to vote your units, you must follow
directions received from your broker to change those instructions.
What does it mean if I get more than one proxy
card?
It indicates that your units are held in more than one account, such as
two brokerage accounts registered in different names. You should complete each
of the proxy cards to ensure that all of your units are voted. We encourage you
to register all of your brokerage accounts in the same name and address for
better service. You should contact your broker, bank or nominee for more
information. Additionally, our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company,
N.A., can assist you if you want to consolidate multiple accounts registered in
your name by contacting our transfer agent at P.O. Box 43078, Providence, RI
02940-3078, Telephone: (781) 575-4238.
2
Quorum and Required Votes
How many votes are needed to hold the
meeting?
A majority of the outstanding units as of the record date must be
represented at the meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business.
This is called a quorum. As of the record date, April 1, 2010, there were
40,070,201 units outstanding held by approximately 51 holders. Unitholders are
entitled to one vote, exercisable in person or by proxy, for each unit, held by
such unitholder on the record date. Our partnership agreement does not provide
for cumulative voting.
Units are counted as present at the
Annual Meeting if:
- the unitholder is present and
votes in person at the meeting,
- the unitholder has properly
submitted a proxy card, or
- under certain circumstances, the
unitholder’s broker votes the units.
Who will count the vote?
Representatives of Computershare
Trust Company, N.A., our transfer agent, will tabulate the votes.
How many votes must the director nominees have
to be elected?
The affirmative vote of holders of a plurality of the units present or
represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the
election of each director nominee. Therefore, abstentions and broker non-votes
will not be taken into account in determining the outcome of the election of
directors.
How are abstentions and broker non-votes
counted?
Abstentions and broker non-votes are included in determining whether a
quorum is present, but will not be included in vote totals and will not affect
the outcome of the vote.
How are proxies solicited?
Proxies may be solicited by mail, telephone, or other means by our
general partner’s officers, directors and our employees. No additional
compensation will be paid to these individuals in connection with proxy
solicitations. We will pay for distributing and soliciting proxies and will
reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians their reasonable fees and expenses
for forwarding proxy materials to unitholders.
Additional Questions and
Information
If you would like additional copies of this proxy statement (which copies
will be provided to you without charge) or if you have questions, including the
procedures for voting your units, you should contact:
Legacy Reserves
LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas 79701
Attention: Steven H. Pruett
President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF
PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
ANNUAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 12,
2010.
The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 are available at http://ir.legacylp.com/annual-proxy.cfm.
3
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Board of Directors
The Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of our
general partner provides that our general partner’s board of directors will
consist of a number of directors as determined from time to time by resolution
adopted by a majority of directors then in office, but shall not be less than
seven, nor more than nine. Currently, our general partner’s board of directors
has seven directors. Each of the nominees for election to the board of directors
is currently a director of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC. If elected at the annual
meeting, each of the nominees will be elected to hold office for a one year term
and thereafter until his successor has been elected and qualified, or until his
earlier death, resignation or removal.
Voting
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes present in person or
represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. Units
represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not
withheld, for the election of the nominees named below. In the event that any
nominee should be unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected
occurrence, such units will be voted for the election of such substitute nominee
as may be nominated by our general partner’s board of directors. Each person
nominated for election has agreed to serve if elected, and we have no reason to
believe that any nominee will be unable to serve.
Recommendation and Proxies
The board of directors recommends a
vote FOR each of the nominees named below.
The persons named in the enclosed proxy card will vote all units over
which they have discretionary authority FOR the election of the nominees named
below. Although our general partner’s board of directors does not anticipate
that any of the nominees will be unable to serve, if such a situation should
arise prior to the meeting, the appointed persons will use their discretionary
authority pursuant to the proxy and vote for the election of such substitute
nominee as may be nominated by our general partner’s board of
directors.
4
Set forth below is biographical information for each person nominated for
a one-year term expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting. Each of the director
nominees is an existing director standing for re-election.
Nominees for Election
Name |
|
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
Director Since |
Cary D.
Brown
|
|
Mr. Brown is
Chairman of the board of directors of our general partner and Chief
Executive Officer of our general partner and has served in such capacities
since our founding in October 2005. Prior to October 2005, Mr. Brown
co-founded two businesses, Moriah Resources, Inc. and Petroleum
Strategies, Inc. Moriah Resources, Inc. was formed in 1992 to acquire oil
and natural gas reserves. Petroleum Strategies, Inc. was formed in 1991 to
serve as a qualified intermediary in connection with the execution of
Section 1031 transactions for major oil companies, public independents and
private oil and natural gas companies. Mr. Brown has served as Executive
Vice President of Petroleum Strategies, Inc. since its inception in 1991.
Mr. Brown served as an auditor for Grant Thornton in Midland, Texas from
January 1991 to June 1991 and for Deloitte & Touche in Houston, Texas
from June 1989 to December 1990. In 1995, Mr. Brown also co-founded and
organized with Mr. Dale Brown The Executive Oil Conference held in
Midland, Texas, which draws over 300 oil and natural gas industry
professionals each year. Mr. Brown has a Bachelor of Business
Administration degree, with honors, from Abilene Christian University. The
board determined that Mr. Brown should be nominated to our board of
directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and
skills, which include: the knowledge and experience attained through 20
years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry and 18 years of
experience in the Permian Basin.
|
|
43
|
|
October
2005
|
Kyle A.
McGraw
|
|
Mr. McGraw is a
member of the board of directors of our general partner and also serves as
the Executive Vice President of Business Development and Land of our
general partner and has served in such capacities since our founding in
October 2005. Mr. McGraw joined Brothers Production Company in 1983, and
has served as its General Manager since 1991 and became President in 2003.
Mr. McGraw is a registered professional engineer (inactive status) in the
state of Texas. Mr. McGraw has a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum
Engineering from Texas Tech University. The board determined that Mr.
McGraw should be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent
experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, which include: the
knowledge and experience attained through 27 years of experience in the
oil and natural gas industry in the Permian Basin, experience as a
petroleum engineer and managerial and executive experience attained
through his service with Brothers Production Company where he has served
in numerous capacities including reservoir and production engineering,
acquisition evaluation and land management.
|
|
50
|
|
October
2005
|
5
Name |
|
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
Director Since |
Dale A.
Brown
|
|
Mr. Brown is a
member of the board of directors of our general partner and has served in
such capacity since our founding in October 2005. Mr. Brown has been
President of Moriah Resources, Inc. since its inception in 1992 and
President of Petroleum Strategies, Inc. since he co-founded it in 1991
with his son, Cary D. Brown. Additionally, Mr. Brown co-founded and
organized with Mr. Cary Brown The Executive Oil Conference, which has been
held annually in Midland, TX since 1995. Mr. Brown is a retired certified
public accountant. Mr. Brown has a Bachelor of Science degree in
Accounting from Pepperdine University. The board determined that Mr. Brown
should be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent
experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, which include:
financial literacy and experience as a Certified Public Accountant
(retired at age 65) since 1967; the knowledge and experience attained
through his service in the petroleum industry since 1972 and managerial
experience attained through his service with Moriah Resources prior to
contribution of its assets as part of the formation of Legacy in
2006.
|
|
67
|
|
October
2005
|
G. Larry
Lawrence
|
|
Mr. Lawrence has
been a member of the board of directors of our general partner since May
1, 2006. Since June 2006, Mr. Lawrence has been self-employed as a
management consultant doing business as Crescent Consulting. From
September 2006 to August 2009, he has served as Chief Financial Officer on
a contract basis for Lynx Operating Company, a private company engaged in
oil and gas operations with a primary business focus on gas processing.
From May 2004 through April 2006, Mr. Lawrence served as Controller of
Pure Resources, an exploration and production company and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Unocal Corporation which was acquired by Chevron
Corporation. From June 2000 through May 2004, Mr. Lawrence was a practice
manager of the Parson Group, LLC, a financial management consulting firm
whose services included Sarbanes Oxley engagements with oil and natural
gas industry clients. From 1973 through May 2000, Mr. Lawrence was
employed by Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) where he most recently (from
1993 through 2000) served as Controller of ARCO Permian. Mr. Lawrence has
a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting, with honors, from Dillard
University. The board determined that Mr. Lawrence should be nominated to
our board of directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications,
attributes and skills, which include: financial expertise and experience
as a chief financial officer and controller, Sarbanes Oxley consulting
expertise, and financial reporting expertise and the knowledge and
experience attained through his years of service in the preparation of
publicly audited financial statements.
|
|
58
|
|
May
2006
|
6
Name |
|
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
Director Since |
William D.
(Bill)
Sullivan |
|
Mr.
Sullivan was appointed to the board of directors of our general partner
upon completion of our private equity offering on March 15, 2006. Since
May 2004, Mr. Sullivan has served as a director and since May 2009, as
non-executive Chairman of the board of directors of St. Mary Land &
Exploration Company, a publicly traded exploration and production company.
Mr. Sullivan has served as director of Targa Resources GP, LLC (the
general partner of Targa Resource Partners LP) since February 14, 2007.
Targa is principally in the gas and gas liquids gathering, processing and
logistics services business. Mr. Sullivan has served as a Director of
Tetra Technologies, Inc. since August 2007. Tetra is principally in the
oilfield services business. From May 2004 through its sale in August 2005,
Mr. Sullivan served as a director of Gryphon Exploration Company, a
privately held exploration and production company. Prior to joining the
board of directors of St. Mary Land & Exploration Company and Gryphon
Exploration Company, Mr. Sullivan was employed in various capacities by
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation from 1981 to August 2003, most recently as
Executive Vice President, Exploration and Production (from August 2001
through August 2003). From June 15, 2005 to August 5, 2005, Mr. Sullivan
was president and CEO of Leor Energy L.P., a privately held exploration
and production company. Mr. Sullivan has a Bachelor of Science degree in
Mechanical Engineering, with high honors, from Texas A&M University.
The board determined that Mr. Sullivan should be nominated to our board of
directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and
skills, which include: the knowledge and experience attained through 25
years as an engineer, manager, and senior executive in the exploration and
production business; his six years as a board member of several
energy sector public companies and one private-equity owned company;
executive experience with project, risk, economic analysis; capital
allocation, strategic planning, organizational development, compensation
program administration, corporate and asset acquisitions, mergers and
integration, international and domestic oil and gas exploration,
development, production, and business development; relationship management
with equipment and service providers, government agencies and
officials. |
|
53 |
|
March
2006 |
7
Name |
|
|
Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
Director Since |
William R. Granberry |
|
Mr.
Granberry was appointed to the board of directors of our general partner
on January 23, 2008. Mr. Granberry has been a member of the Board of
Directors of The Williams Companies, Inc. (an integrated gas company with
exploration and production, midstream, and gas pipeline operations) since
November 2005 and a member of Compass Operating Company, LLC, a small,
private oil and gas exploration, development and producing company with
properties in West Texas and Southeast New Mexico since October 2004. From
1999 through September 2004, he managed investments and consulted with oil
and gas companies. He invested in and became a board member of
Just4Biz.com (a start-up internet company engaged in online office supply)
in 1999 and served as Interim CEO for brief periods in 2000 and 2001.
Just4Biz. com filed for bankruptcy in May 2001. Mr. Granberry was
President and Chief Operating Officer of Tom Brown, Inc. from January 1996
to May 1999. Tom Brown, Inc. was a public oil and gas company with
exploration, development, acquisition and production activities throughout
the central United States. Mr. Granberry earned Bachelor of Science and
Master of Science degrees in Petroleum Engineering from the University of
Texas and upon graduation, worked for Amoco Production Company for 16
years. The board determined that Mr. Granberry should be nominated to our board of
directors due to his pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and
skills, which include: expertise in the oil and gas industry which was
attained through his 44 years of service in engineering and service in
executive positions with companies ranging from a large global energy
company to small independents. |
|
67 |
|
January 2008 |
Kyle D.
Vann |
|
Mr. Vann was appointed
to the board of directors of our general partner upon completion of our
private equity offering on March 15, 2006. From 1979 through January 2001,
Mr. Vann was employed by Koch Industries. From February 2001 through
December 2004, Mr. Vann served as Chief Executive Officer of Entergy —
Koch, LP, an energy trading and transportation company. Mr. Vann continues
to serve Entergy as a consultant and serves on the board and consults with
Texon, LP, a private petroleum transportation company. On May 8, 2006, Mr.
Vann was appointed to the board of directors of Crosstex Energy, L.P., a
publicly traded midstream master limited partnership. In November 2009,
Mr. Vann joined the Advisory Board of Haddington Ventures, LLC - a private
equity firm. In January 2009, Mr. Vann Served as an advisory board member
for Enexus, LLC, which is a subsidiary of Entergy Corporation. Mr. Vann
has a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering, with honors,
from the University of Kansas. The board determined that Mr. Vann should
be nominated to our board of directors due to his pertinent experience,
qualifications, attributes and skills, which include: the knowledge and
experience attained through 29 years of service in the commodity trading
business and his background and expertise in risk assessment and
leadership in the energy sector. |
|
62 |
|
March 2006 |
8
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Management of Legacy Reserves
LP
The directors and
officers of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, as our general partner, manage our
operations and activities. Our general partner is not elected by our unitholders
and will not be subject to re-election on a regular basis in the future. Other
than through their ability to elect directors of our general partner as
described below, unitholders will not be entitled to directly or indirectly
participate in our management or operation.
Our general partner
owes a fiduciary duty to our unitholders. Our general partner will be liable, as
general partner, for all of our debts (to the extent not paid from our assets),
except for indebtedness or other obligations that are made specifically
nonrecourse to it. Our general partner therefore may cause us to incur
indebtedness or other obligations that are nonrecourse to it.
The limited liability
company agreement of our general partner provides for a board of directors of
not less than seven and not more than nine members.
Our unitholders,
including affiliates of our general partner, are entitled to annually elect all
of the directors of our general partner. Directors of our general partner hold
office until the earlier of their death, resignation, removal or
disqualification or until their successors have been elected and
qualified.
Board of Directors
During the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009, our general partner’s board of directors held
fifteen meetings. It is the policy of our general partner’s board of directors
to encourage directors to attend each meeting of unitholders. Six of our seven
directors attended the Annual Meeting held in 2009.
Director Independence
Four members of the
board of directors of our general partner serve on a conflicts committee to
review specific matters that the board believes may involve conflicts of
interest. The conflicts committee will determine if the resolution of the
conflict of interest is fair and reasonable to us. The members of the conflicts
committee may not be officers or employees of our general partner or directors,
officers, or employees of its affiliates, and must meet the independence and
experience standards established by any national securities exchange on which
our securities may be listed and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or Exchange Act, and other federal securities laws. Under NASDAQ Global
Select Market, or NASDAQ, listing standards the board of directors must
affirmatively determine that a director is independent. Any matters approved by
the conflicts committee will be conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to
us, approved by all of our partners and not a breach by our general partner of
any duties it may owe us or our unitholders.
In addition, the
board of directors of our general partner has an audit committee of three
directors who meet the independence and experience standards established by
NASDAQ and the Exchange Act. The audit committee reviews our external financial
reporting, recommends engagement of our independent auditors and reviews
procedures for internal auditing and the adequacy of our internal accounting
controls. The board of directors of our general partner also has a compensation
committee, consisting of three independent members, that administers the Legacy
Reserves LP Long-Term Incentive Plan, or LTIP. Additionally, the board of
directors of our general partner has a nominating and governance committee,
consisting of three independent members, that will nominate candidates to serve
on the board of directors of our general partner.
The board annually
reviews all relevant business relationships any director may have with Legacy
and the independence standards established by the NASDAQ. As a result of its
annual review and nomination process, the board has determined that none of the
Messrs. Sullivan, Lawrence, Vann and Granberry has a material relationship with
the Partnership and, as a result, such directors are determined to be
independent. Although not required, we currently have a majority of independent
directors on the board of directors of our general partner.
9
Independent members
of the board of directors of our general partner serve as the members of the
conflicts (Messrs. Sullivan (chairman), Granberry, Lawrence and Vann), audit
(Messrs. Lawrence (chairman), Granberry and Sullivan ), compensation (Messrs.
Vann (chairman), Granberry and Lawrence) and nominating and governance (Messrs.
Granberry (chairman), Lawrence, Sullivan and Vann) committees.
The audit committee
met six times, the compensation committee met six times, the nominating and
governance committee met one time, and the conflicts committee met twenty-five
times during 2009.
Leadership Structure of the
Board
As prescribed by the
amended and restated limited liability company agreement of our general partner,
the Chairman of the board of directors has the power to preside at all meetings
of the Board. Mr. C. Brown serves as our Chairman of our Board and as our Chief
Executive Officer. The board believes that the combination of the Chairman and
CEO roles is appropriate in the current circumstances, however, such approach is
not established as a policy and the nominating and governance committee will
re-evaluate this approach periodically.
The nominating and
governance committee believes that Mr. C. Brown’s history as one of the
Partnership’s founders and his strategic experience make him the appropriate
leader of the Board. In 2009, the nominating and governance committee considered
the appointment of an independent lead director and determined not to appoint
one. It is the nominating and governance committee’s view that Mr. C. Brown in
his dual capacity as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer will
serve as an effective communication link between the Board and management and
there is no need for an independent lead director at this time. The nominating
and governance committee will re-evaluate its view on the Board’s leadership
structure periodically.
Risk Oversight
While it is the job
of management to assess and manage our risk, the board and its audit committee
(each where applicable) discuss the guidelines and policies that govern the
process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken and evaluate
reports from various functions with the management team on risk assessment and
management. The board interfaces regularly with management and receives periodic
reports that include updates on operational, financial, legal and risk
management matters. The audit committee assists the board in oversight of the
integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, including those related to the health, safety and
environmental performance of Legacy. The audit committee also reviews and
assesses the performance of our internal audit function and our independent
auditors. The board receives regular reports from the audit committee. We do not
believe that the board’s role in risk oversight has an effect on the board’s
leadership structure.
Evaluation of Compensation
Risk
Following a review of
all of the compensation programs available to all employees of the company, we
believe that there is not a reasonable likelihood that our current compensation
practices and programs could have a material adverse effect on Legacy.
Audit Committee
Membership
The audit committee
has been established in accordance with Rule 10A-3 promulgated under the
Exchange Act. The board of directors of our general partner has appointed
Messrs. Lawrence, Sullivan and Granberry as members of the audit committee. Mr.
Lawrence serves as the chair of the committee. Each of the members of the audit
committee has been determined by the board of directors to be independent under
NASDAQ’s standards for audit committee members to serve on its audit committee.
In addition, the board of directors has determined that at least one member of
the audit committee (Mr. Lawrence) has such accounting or related financial
management expertise sufficient to qualify such person as the audit committee
financial expert in accordance with Item 407 of Regulation S-K and NASDAQ
requirements.
10
Responsibilities
The audit committee
assists the general partner’s board of directors in overseeing:
- our accounting and financial
reporting processes;
- the integrity of our financial
statements;
- our compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements;
- the qualifications and
independence of our independent auditors; and
- the performance of our internal
audit function and our independent auditors.
The audit committee
is also charged with making regular reports to the board of directors of the
general partner and preparing any reports that may be required
under NASDAQ listing standards or SEC rules.
Charter
The board of
directors of our general partner has adopted a charter for the audit committee,
a copy of which is available on our website at www.legacylp.com. Please note that the preceding Internet
address is for information purposes only and is not intended to be a hyperlink.
Accordingly, no information found or provided at that Internet address or at our
website in general is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference
herein.
Compensation Committee
Membership
The compensation
committee consists of three members of the board of directors, Messrs. Lawrence,
Granberry (who replaced Mr. Sullivan as a member of the compensation committee
in May 2009) and Vann, all of whom have been determined by the board of
directors of our general partner to be independent under NASDAQ listing
standards. In addition, each member of the compensation committee qualifies as a
“non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the
Exchange Act, and as an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Mr. Vann is the chair of the
compensation committee.
Responsibilities
The committee’s
responsibilities under its charter are to:
- evaluate and/or develop the
compensation policies applicable to the executive officers of the our
general partner, which are
required to include guidance regarding the specific relationship of
performance to executive
compensation;
- review and approve on an annual
basis the corporate goals and objectives with respect to compensation
for the Chief Executive
Officer;
- evaluate at least once a year the
Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of established goals and
objectives;
- determine and approve the Chief
Executive Officer’s compensation;
- make recommendations to the board
with respect to the compensation to be paid to the general partner’s
other executive officers based on the
approval of the compensation committee of the Chief Executive Officer’s report and
recommendation;
- periodically review the
compensation paid to non-employee directors (including board and
committee chairpersons) and to
make recommendations to the board regarding any adjustments;
- review and make recommendations to
the board with respect to our incentive compensation and other unit-based plans;
11
- assist the full board with respect
to the administration of the incentive compensation and other
unit-based plans;
and
- prepare and publish an annual
executive compensation report.
Charter
The board of
directors has adopted a charter for the compensation committee, a copy of which
is available on our website at www.legacylp.com. Please note that the preceding Internet
address is for information purposes only and is not intended to be a hyperlink.
Accordingly, no information found or provided at that Internet address or at our
website in general is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference
herein.
Nominating and Governance
Committee
Membership
The nominating and
governance committee consists of Messrs. Lawrence, Granberry (who joined the
nominating and governance committee in May 2009), Sullivan and Vann. Mr.
Granberry serves as the chair of the committee. The
board of directors has determined that all members of the nominating and
governance committee are independent under NASDAQ listing standards. The purpose
of the nominating and governance committee is to:
- identify, recruit, evaluate and
recommend individuals for election to the board and the committees
thereof as well as to fill any
vacancies, consistent with criteria approved by the board,
- develop and oversee the general
partner’s policies and procedures regarding compliance with applicable
laws and regulations relating to the
honest and ethical conduct of the general partner’s directors, officers
and employees, and senior financial
officers (as well as the sole responsibility for granting any waivers
thereunder),
- evaluate annually, based on input
from the entire board, the performance of the general partner’s Chief
Executive Officer and report the
results of the evaluation to the compensation committee, and
- oversee the evaluations of the
board, the committees of the board and management.
Responsibilities
In addition to the
purposes of the committee listed above, the duties of the nominating and
governance committee include:
- develop a process to be used by
the committee in identifying and evaluating candidates for membership
on the board and its
committees,
- annually present to the board a
list of nominees recommended for election to the board at the annual
meeting of
unitholders,
- adopt a policy regarding the
consideration of any director candidates recommended by unitholders of
the Partnership and the
procedures to be followed by such unitholders in making such
recommendations,
- adopt a process for unitholders of
the Partnership to send communications to the board, and
- recommend general matters for
consideration by the board including, but not limited to: (i) the structure of board meetings, (ii) director
retirement policies, (iii) director and officer insurance policy requirements, (iv) policies regarding the
number of boards on which a director may serve, (v) director orientation and training, and (vi) the role
of the general partner’s executive officers and the outside directorships of such directors.
12
Director
Nominations
Under our amended and
restated agreement of limited partnership, unitholders desiring to suggest a
board nominee must give prior written notice to our Secretary regarding the
persons to be nominated. The notice must be received at our principal executive
offices at the address shown on the cover page within the specified period and
must be accompanied by the information and documents specified in the amended
and restated agreement of limited partnership. A copy of the amended and
restated agreement of limited partnership may be obtained by writing to our
Secretary at the address shown on the cover page of this proxy
statement.
Recommendations by
unitholders for directors to be nominated at the 2011 annual meeting of
unitholders must be in writing and include sufficient biographical and other
relevant information such that an informed judgment as to the proposed nominee’s
qualifications can be made and the name, address and the class and number of
units owned by such unitholder. Recommendations must be accompanied by a
notarized statement executed by the proposed nominee consenting to be named in
the proxy statement, if nominated, and to serve as a director, if elected.
Notice and the accompanying information must be received at our principal
executive office at the address shown on the cover page of this proxy statement
no later than January 14, 2011 and no earlier than December 30,
2010.
The amended and
restated agreement of limited partnership does not affect any unitholder’s right
to request inclusion of proposals in our proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8
promulgated under the Exchange Act. Rule 14a-8 specifies what constitutes timely
submission for a unitholder proposal to be included in our proxy statement.
Under the SEC’s proxy solicitation rules, to be considered for inclusion in the
proxy materials for the 2011 annual meeting of unitholders, unitholder proposals
must be received by our Secretary at our principal offices in Midland, Texas
by December 13, 2010. Unitholders are urged to
review all applicable rules and consult legal counsel before submitting a
nomination or proposal to us.
Nomination
Criteria
The nominating and
governance committee is responsible for assessing the skills and characteristics
that candidates for election to our general partner’s board of directors should
possess, as well as the composition of our general partner’s board of directors
as a whole. The assessments include qualifications under applicable independence
standards and other standards applicable to our general partner’s board of
directors and its committees, as well as consideration of skills and experience
in the context of the needs of our general partner’s board of directors. Each
candidate must meet certain minimum qualifications, including:
- the ability to dedicate sufficient
time, energy and attention to the performance of her or his duties,
taking into consideration the
nominee’s service on other public company boards; and
- skills and expertise complementary
to the skills and expertise of the existing members of our general
partner’s board of directors; in this
regard, the board of directors will consider its need for operational,
managerial, financial, governmental
affairs or other relevant expertise.
The nominating and
governance committee may also consider the ability of a prospective candidate to
work with the then-existing interpersonal dynamics of our general partner’s
board of directors and the candidate’s ability to contribute to the
collaborative culture among the members of the board of directors of our general
partner.
The nominating and
governance committee will also evaluate each nominee based upon a consideration
of diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the
general partner’s board of directors. The nominating and governance committee
does not have a policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in
identifying director nominees. Diversity, including diversity of experience,
professional expertise, gender, race and age, is one factor considered in
evaluating a nominee.
Based on this initial
evaluation, the committee will determine whether to interview the candidate, and
if warranted, will recommend that one or more of its members, other members of
our general partner’s board of directors or senior management, as appropriate,
interview the candidate in person or by telephone. After completing this
evaluation and interview process, the committee ultimately determines its list
of nominees and submits it to the full board of directors of our general partner
for consideration and approval.
13
Charter
Our general partner’s
board of directors has adopted a charter for the nominating and governance
committee, a copy of which is available on our website at www.legacylp.com. Please note that the preceding Internet
address is for information purposes only and is not intended to be a hyperlink.
Accordingly, no information found or provided at that Internet address or at our
website in general is intended or deemed to be incorporated by reference
herein.
Conflicts Committee
Membership
The conflicts
committee consists of Messrs. Granberry, Lawrence, Sullivan and Vann. The board
of directors has determined that all members of the conflicts committee are
independent under NASDAQ listing standards. Mr. Sullivan serves as the chair of
the conflicts committee.
Responsibilities
The conflicts
committee, at the request of the board of directors of our general partner, will
review specific matters that the board of directors of our general partner
believes may involve a conflict of interest. The conflicts committee will
determine if the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and reasonable
to us. Any matters approved by the conflicts committee will be conclusively
deemed to be fair and reasonable to us, approved by all of our partners and not
a breach by our general partner of any duties it may owe us or our
unitholders.
Code of Ethics
The board of
directors of our general partner has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business
Conduct applicable to officers, directors of our general partner and our
employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer and controller, or those persons
performing similar functions, of our general partner. The Code of Ethics and
Business Conduct is available on our website at www.legacylp.com and in print to any unitholder who requests
it. Amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct will
also be available on our website and reported as may be required under SEC
rules; however, any technical, administrative or other non-substantive
amendments to the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct may not be posted. Please
note that the preceding Internet address is for information purposes only and is
not intended to be a hyperlink. Accordingly, no information found or provided at
that Internet addresses or at our website in general is intended or deemed to be
incorporated by reference herein.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following
discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of the named executive
officers of our general partner, Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, should be read
together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth
below.
Introduction
Our general partner
manages our operations and activities through its board of directors. Under our
amended and restated agreement of limited partnership, we reimburse our general
partner for direct and indirect general and administrative expenses incurred on
our behalf, including the compensation of our general partner’s executive
officers. Our general partner has not incurred any reimbursable expenses related
to the compensation of our general partner’s executive officers for their
management of us. Currently, our general partner’s executive officers are
employed by our wholly-owned subsidiary, Legacy Reserves Services, Inc., and are
directly compensated for their management of us pursuant to their employment
agreements. The compensation amounts disclosed in this section and under
“Executive Compensation” reflect the total compensation paid to the executive
officers of our general partner. Please read “Executive Compensation —
Employment Agreements.”
14
The five named
executive officers of our general partner are Cary D. Brown, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer; Steven H.
Pruett, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary; Kyle A. McGraw,
Director and Executive Vice President of Business Development and Land; Paul T.
Horne, Executive Vice President of Operations; and William M. Morris, Vice
President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller.
Corporate Governance
Compensation Committee Authority
Executive officer
compensation is administered by the compensation committee of the board of
directors of our general partner, which is composed of three members, Messrs.
Vann, Lawrence and Granberry (who replaced Mr. Sullivan as a member of the
committee in May 2009). The board of directors appoints the compensation
committee members and delegates to the compensation committee the direct
responsibility for, among other things, determining and approving the Chief
Executive Officer’s compensation, recommending compensation for the general
partner’s other named executive officers, establishing equity and non-equity
incentive plans, and administering our LTIP.
The board of
directors has determined that each committee member is independent under NASDAQ
listing standards, SEC rules and the relevant securities laws, and that each
member qualifies as a “non-employee” director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act, and as an “outside director” as defined in
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The
compensation committee met six times in 2009.
Role of Compensation Experts in Determining 2009 Executive
Officer Compensation
The compensation
committee is authorized to obtain, at the Partnership’s expense, compensation
surveys, reports on the design and implementation of compensation programs for
directors, officers and employees, and other data and documentation as the
compensation committee considers appropriate. In addition, the compensation
committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any outside counsel or
other experts or consultants engaged to assist it in the evaluation of
compensation of our directors and executive officers, including the sole
authority to approve such consultants’ fees and other retention
terms.
The compensation
committee retained BDO Seidman, LLP (“BDO”) as a compensation consultant for
2009. BDO was engaged to provide a study of compensation programs related to
named executive officers and outside directors offered by a broad peer group of
exploration and production companies and publicly traded limited
partnerships. The compensation committee charged BDO with undertaking this study
to ascertain how the members of this peer group structure their compensation and
to assist the compensation committee in establishing and maintaining a
competitive compensation program to better enable the Partnership to attract and
retain highly qualified executive officers and to further align the interests of
our executive officers with those of our unitholders. In addition to peer group
studies, BDO also consulted with the compensation committee regarding the design
of long-term incentive awards and the compensation of outside
directors.
Selection of Compensation Comparative
Data
As discussed in
greater detail below, central to our compensation philosophy is the alignment of
the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our
unitholders. It is the goal of our compensation philosophy to provide financial
incentives to our executive officers to focus on business strategies designed to
increase the distributions we pay to our unitholders. Except for comparing
compensation packages of our named executive officers and outside directors with
the compensation of their counterparts within our peer group of exploration and
production companies and master limited partnerships, other specific performance
levels or “benchmarks” were not used in 2009 to establish the compensation
packages of our named executive officers and outside directors.
15
In 2009, our peer group included Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., Concho
Resources, Inc., Parallel Petroleum, Inc., St. Mary’s Land and Exploration,
Inc., Whiting Petroleum Corp., Atlas Energy Resources, LLC, Breitburn Energy
Partners L.P., Copano Energy, L.L.C., Encore Energy Partners LP, EV Energy
Partners, LP, Linn Energy, LLC, Pioneer Southwest Energy Partners, and Vanguard
Natural Resources.
Decision-Making Process and Role of Executive
Officers
Compensation decisions for executive officers involve both objective and
subjective criteria. In 2009, the first step was the compensation committee
consultant providing information to the compensation committee regarding
competitive market data. The second component of the decision making process was
our Chief Executive Officer providing a written overview of performance by the
Partnership, including an overview of the performance by each named executive
officer other than himself, in light of established operational and
financial goals and objectives. After reviewing this written overview, the
compensation committee met with the Chief Executive Officer in order to ask
questions regarding the information set forth in the written overview and to
gather any additional information needed in order to make recommendations to the
board of directors regarding the compensation of the named executive officers
other than the Chief Executive Officer.
In determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, the
compensation committee took into account the information provided by the
compensation committee consultant. The compensation committee then evaluated the
Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of established operational and
financial goals and objectives and determined as a committee, together with any
other independent directors participating in the process, the Chief Executive
Officer’s compensation.
Executive Officer Compensation Strategy and
Philosophy
In September 2009, we adopted a new executive officer compensation policy
(the “Compensation Policy”) to make our executive officers’ total compensation
more competitive with that of comparably-sized exploration and production
companies that operate in the Permian Basin and U.S. Mid-Continent Region and
publicly traded limited partnerships. In February 2010, the Compensation Policy
was amended to revise the methodology of calculating the objective portion of
equity based incentive compensation.
Our executive officer compensation strategy is designed to align the
compensation of the executive officers with unitholder return, be competitive
with peer companies and have the flexibility to be both competitive and aligned
with unitholder return in a volatile economic climate. We provide financial
incentives to our executive officers for performance, achievement of goals and
enhancement of unitholder value. Our compensation philosophy is to drive and
support the long-term goal of sustainable growth in unit distributions and total
unitholder return by paying for performance. In meeting the goal of sustainable
growth, we intend to invest in our long-term opportunities while meeting our
short-term commitments.
As many of our executive officers hold units in the Partnership, we have
attempted to maintain competitive levels of compensation while focusing on the
growth of our business and distributions. Through this approach, our executives
receive salaries for the market value of their services and their performance is
further rewarded through the distributions they receive on their holdings of our
units, which creates alignment of interests with our unitholders.
At our named executive officers’ 2009 compensation levels and due to our
organizational structure, we did not believe that Internal Revenue Code Section
162(m) would be applicable and accordingly, did not consider it in setting 2009
compensation levels.
Components of Compensation
Named Executive Officer
Compensation
Total compensation to our executive officers is comprised of base salary,
non-equity incentive based compensation (cash bonus) and equity-based incentive
compensation.
16
2009 Performance Goals and
Objectives
For the 2009 performance year, the
operational and financial goals and objectives were as follows:
- Maintain cash distributions of
$0.52 with a coverage ratio of approximately 1.2 times;
- EBITDA (as such term is defined in
the Partnership’s revolving
credit facility) of $115 million on our base assets with $28 million of
development expenditures including workover expenses based on a $50 per bbl
and $5.50 per MMBtu Henry Hub gas prices, and $124.0 million with $100 million
in acquisitions at a six times cash flow purchase
multiple;
- Production cost of $14.30 per Boe,
excluding severance, ad valorem taxes and workover expenses;
- Acquire $100 million of producing
properties at six times cash flow; and
- Zero lost time accidents for
Legacy employees.
These goals and objectives, as supplemented by more detailed supporting
goals and objectives put forth by our named executive officers, provided a
framework for the compensation committee to assess our 2009 performance and to
determine named executive officers’ compensation. Relative weight is not
assigned to any or all of these goals and objectives. Additionally, the various
financial goals were based on various assumptions, with the understanding that
our actual financial performance would be assessed based on factors considered
relevant by the compensation committee at the time named executive officer
compensation was reviewed and determined.
2009 Performance
Assessment
The compensation committee assessed the 2009 performance of executive
officers for purposes of the determination of the subjective cash bonus (as set
forth in the Compensation Policy) based on the attainment of the foregoing goals
and objectives and the performance-related factors that it considered to be
relevant. Among other things, the compensation committee considered the
following achievements by the Partnership and the executive officers:
- Accomplished 1.3x coverage ratio
while paying out $2.08 in annualized distribution;
- Generated $120.0 million of EBITDA
against a goal of $115 million without acquisitions, and a goal of $124.0
million with $100 million in acquisitions at a six times cash flow purchase
multiple;
- Lowered production costs to $14.02
per Boe as compared to a goal of $14.30;
- Acquired $8.4 million of
properties at four times cash flow with an additional $130 million
acquisitions pending at year end; and
- Only one lost time accident
involving an auto collision that was not the fault of the lease
operator.
Based on achieving a distribution coverage ratio of 1.3 (in excess of a
goal of a distribution coverage ratio of 1.2), $120 million of EBITDA against a
goal of $115 without the impact of acquisitions, lowering productions costs to
$14.02 below a goal of $14.30 and only one lost time accident during 2009, the
compensation committee awarded to Mr. Brown the subjective component of the cash
bonus and recommended to the board that the executive officers other than Mr.
Brown be awarded the subjective component of the cash bonus at the individual
levels set forth under “Subjective Cash Award” below.
Base
Salaries
Overview
We pay base salary to attract talented executives and provide a fixed
base of cash compensation. The compensation committee determines and approves
the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, including salary, based on a review
of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of established corporate
goals and objectives. The compensation committee, with the assistance of the
compensation committee consultant and input of the Chief Executive Officer, also
makes recommendations to the board of directors as a whole with respect to the
compensation, including base salary, to be paid to the other executive officers
of our general partner.
17
It is the intent of the compensation committee to have the base salaries
of our named executive officers reviewed on an annual basis as well as at the
time of a promotion or other material change in responsibilities.
2009 Base Salary
Determinations
On September 21, 2009, the board, upon recommendation of the compensation
committee, determined that the following salaries to each of our named executive
officers for 2009 remain unchanged from 2008 levels: Cary D. Brown, $325,000;
Steven H. Pruett, $275,000; Paul T. Horne, $250,000; Kyle A. McGraw, $235,000;
and William M. Morris, $220,000.
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation
(Cash Bonus)
Overview
As a component of total compensation, the compensation committee chooses
to pay annual incentives to drive the achievement of key results and to
recognize individuals based on their contributions to those results. The
compensation committee recognizes that short-term results contribute to
achieving long-term goals. The amount of annual incentives is based upon our
results and the achievement of operational and financial goals and
objectives. The range and target amounts are recommended to the compensation
committee by our Chief Executive Officer.
In determining non-equity incentive awards, a subjective evaluation of
prior fiscal year individual officer and Partnership performance (subjective
criteria) and our results and the achievement of operational and financial goals
and objectives during the prior fiscal (objective criteria) are considered. The
objective and subjective components of the non-equity incentive compensation
each comprise 50% of the maximum bonus available expressed as a percentage of
annual salary for each executive officer, as set forth in the following
table.
|
|
|
|
Maximum Cash Bonus Opportunity
as |
|
|
|
|
a Percentage of Annual
Salary |
Named
Executive Officer |
|
|
Title |
|
Subjective |
|
Objective |
|
Total |
Cary D. Brown |
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief |
|
55 |
% |
|
55 |
% |
|
110 |
% |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven H. Pruett |
|
President, Chief Financial Officer and |
|
50 |
% |
|
50 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul T. Horne |
|
Executive Vice President of
Operations |
|
40 |
% |
|
40 |
% |
|
80 |
% |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
Director, Executive Vice President of |
|
35 |
% |
|
35 |
% |
|
70 |
% |
|
|
Business Development and Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William M. Morris |
|
Vice President, Chief
Accounting |
|
30 |
% |
|
30 |
% |
|
60 |
% |
|
|
Officer and Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective Component of Cash
Bonus
The objective component (up to 50%
of the annual cash bonus) is based on two measures of equal weight:
- EBITDA (as defined in the
Partnership’s revolving credit facility); and
- Growth in cash distributions per
unit.
18
The percentage levels that may be earned each year are based on the
ranges of performance levels with respect to each target as set forth in the
following table, as determined by straight-line interpolation.
Performance Measure |
|
|
Weight |
|
Performance Level/Percent
Earned |
EBITDA |
|
50% |
|
85% of Target |
|
100% of Target |
|
115% of Target |
|
|
|
|
30% |
|
75% |
|
100% |
Growth in Cash Distributions Per
Unit |
|
50% |
|
0% of
Growth |
|
7.5% of
Growth |
|
15% of
Growth |
|
|
|
|
50% |
|
75% |
|
100% |
These objective measures are intended to align the incentive compensation
of each executive officer with unitholder return by rewarding performance that
maintains or grows distributions and increases EBITDA. EBITDA and growth in cash
distributions per unit are used to determine the objective component of the cash
bonus. The respective target levels, for purposes of the annual cash bonus
determination only, will be set by the compensation committee at the beginning
of each year after considering management’s recommendation.
During 2009, the Partnership achieved EBITDA of $120.0 million, or 96.8%
of the $124 million target EBITDA, resulting in a Percentage Earned (pursuant to
the table above) of 65.3% (weighted at 50% or 32.6%) and distribution growth in
2009 was 0%, resulting in a Percentage Earned of 50% (weighted at 50% or 25%),
resulting in bonus amounts at 57.6% of the Objective Factor (as set forth in the
table below).
Subjective Cash
Award
Each executive officer was awarded the cash bonuses in the amounts
determined by the percentage of maximum levels available, as set forth under “%
of Subjective Factor” in the table below, and the potential maximum level of the
subjective component of short-term (cash) incentive compensation for 2009 (the
“Subjective Factor” as set forth below).
Based on Legacy’s and the individual executive officers’ accomplishments
and performances as set forth above, under the caption - “2009 Performance
Assessment,” on February 18, 2010, the compensation committee recommended to the
board, and the board set the subjective portion of the cash bonus as shown in
the following table.
The chart below illustrates the 2009 cash incentive award for each named
executive officer in accordance with the performance level/percentage earned
calculation set forth in the Compensation Policy:
|
|
|
|
|
Subjective |
|
Objective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Subjective |
|
Subjective |
|
Bonus |
|
Objective |
|
Bonus |
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer |
|
|
Salary |
|
Factor |
|
Factor |
|
Amount |
|
Factor |
|
Amount (a) |
|
Total Bonus |
Cary D. Brown |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
55% |
|
80% |
|
$ |
143,000 |
|
55% |
|
$ |
103,049 |
|
$ |
246,049 |
Steven H. Pruett |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
50% |
|
80% |
|
$ |
110,000 |
|
50% |
|
$ |
79,269 |
|
$ |
189,269 |
Paul T. Horne |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
40% |
|
90% |
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
40% |
|
$ |
57,650 |
|
$ |
147,650 |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
35% |
|
70% |
|
$ |
57,575 |
|
35% |
|
$ |
47,417 |
|
$ |
104,992 |
William M. Morris |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
30% |
|
70% |
|
$ |
46,200 |
|
30% |
|
$ |
38,049 |
|
$ |
84,249 |
____________________
(a) |
|
The
amounts are determined by using a weighted earned percentage of 57.6% of
the Objective Factor as determined in accordance with the formula set
forth in the Compensation Policy. See “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation”
above. |
19
Determination and Approval of
Executive Officer One-time Bonus for 2009
On September 25, 2009, the board, upon recommendation of the compensation
committee, awarded onetime cash bonuses to each of the executive officers in the
amounts set forth below. The bonuses were awarded as recognition of management’s
focus during the first half of 2009 while the conflicts committee evaluated the
offer of Apollo Management VII, LP to acquire for cash all of the outstanding
units of Legacy as well as management’s performance during the challenging
commodity price and capital markets environment while achieving the
following:
- Reduced production costs 24% to
$14.22 per Boe in the first half of 2009 from $17.37 per Boe for the year
ending December 31, 2008;
- With limited capital investment
available, stabilized oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas
production;
- Maintained Legacy’s borrowing
capacity over the period; and
- Raised net proceeds, before
offering expenses, of $57.6 million through the public offering and sale of
3,795,000 units.
|
One-time |
Named Executive Officer |
|
Bonus |
Cary D. Brown |
$ |
162,500 |
Steven H. Pruett |
$ |
110,000 |
Paul T. Horne |
$ |
75,000 |
Kyle A. McGraw |
$ |
58,750 |
William M. Morris |
$ |
44,000 |
Equity-Based Incentive
Compensation
Overview
We provide performance-based equity-based incentive compensation
opportunities to our executive officers as part of the compensation program
because we believe that this element of compensation ties the interests of our
executive officers directly to the interests of our unitholders. We also believe
that equity-based incentive compensation serves as an important retention
tool.
More specifically, the equity-based incentive compensation program
adopted by the board of directors and compensation committee of our general
partner is designed to reward our named executive officers for their long-term
performance by aligning grants of phantom units with associated distribution
equivalent rights, or DERs, with the growth of distributions to unitholders. The
DERs entitle the recipient of the award with a payment equivalent to the amount
of per unit distribution payable to unitholders.
We consider equity-based incentive compensation to be an important
element of our compensation program for named executive officers. We believe
meaningful equity participation by each named executive officer to be a strong
motivating factor that will result in significant increases in value and in
growth. This belief is reflected in the aggregate awards of unit options and
phantom units that have been made to named executive officers that did not
already have a significant interest in our units.
In September 2009, the compensation committee established a new award
structure for long-term equity-based incentives that employs a mix of subjective
and objective measures, weighted at 50% each.
Subjective or Service-Based Component. The subjective or service-based component is
determined by a subjective evaluation of prior fiscal year performance and, with
respect to each executive officer, may be awarded up to the maximum percentage
of annual salary as set forth in the table below. Once granted, the only
condition to vesting will be that the executive officer remain in the service of
the Partnership until the end of the respective vesting period. The vesting of
service-based equity-based awards, once granted, is not subject to the
attainment of any performance criteria.
20
Objective or Performance-Based Component. The objective or performance-based component
is granted each year at the maximum percentage listed in the table below, but
the amount vested each year for the three-year vesting period is determined on
each vesting date in accordance with a formula (as set forth under “Calculation
of Vesting of Objective Component of Equity-Based Compensation” below) based on
the objective total unitholder return and relative performance measures
(described below) achieved during the fiscal year prior to the applicable
vesting date. If none or only a portion of phantom units of a particular tranche
vest as a result of target levels not being met, the unvested portion of phantom
units will be forfeited.
All equity-based incentive compensation awards will be phantom units,
with associated DERs, up to the maximum amounts reflected as percentages of
annual salary as set forth in the following table.
|
|
|
|
Maximum Grant Value of
Phantom |
|
|
|
|
Units as a Percentage of Annual
Salary |
Named Executive Officer |
|
|
Title |
|
Subjective |
|
Objective |
|
Total |
Cary D. Brown |
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief |
|
100 |
% |
|
150 |
% |
|
250 |
% |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven H. Pruett |
|
President, Chief Financial Officer and |
|
80 |
% |
|
120 |
% |
|
200 |
% |
|
|
Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul T. Horne |
|
Executive Vice President of
Operations |
|
60 |
% |
|
90 |
% |
|
150 |
% |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
Director, Executive Vice President of |
|
50 |
% |
|
75 |
% |
|
125 |
% |
|
|
Business Development and Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William M. Morris |
|
Vice President, Chief
Accounting |
|
40 |
% |
|
60 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
Officer and Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A phantom unit is a notional unit that entitles the holder upon vesting
to receive cash valued at the closing price of units on the vesting date, or, at
the discretion of the compensation committee, the same number of Partnership
units. The number of phantom units granted will be determined by dividing the
dollar amount of the intended grant value by the average closing price of
Partnership units over the 20 trading days preceding the date of grant. All
phantom unit grants vest over a three-year period, with each tranche to vest on
the first, second and third anniversary of the initial grant date, as
applicable. With respect to the objective component only, the actual number
vested will be determined based on the three-step formula set forth
below.
With respect to all phantom unit grants, DERs accumulate and accrue based
on the assumed 100% vesting of each tranche. With respect to the objective
component only, the actual amounts payable are based solely on the number of
vested underlying phantom units.
Calculation of Vesting of Objective Component of
Equity-Based Compensation
At the vesting date of each one-third tranche of the objective or
performance-based component of equity-based compensation, the number of phantom
units to vest each year is determined based on the following three-step process,
with the total vested amount for each year to be determined by adding the values
arrived at in Step 1 and Step 2.
Step 1:
50% of the performance-based award will be a function of the Total Unitholder
Return for the Partnership (“Legacy TUR”) and the ordinal rank of the Legacy TUR
among such upstream master limited partnership (“MLP”) peer companies as
determined by the compensation committee at the beginning of each fiscal year
(“Peer Group”). The percentage of the 50% of the performance-based award to vest
under this Step 1 is determined within a matrix which ranges from 0% to 100% and
will increase from 0% to 100% as each of the Legacy TUR and the ordinal rank of
the Legacy TUR among the Peer Group increase. The applicable Legacy TUR range is
from less than 8% (where no vesting will occur) to more than 20% (where 100% of
the amount available under this Step 1 is subject to vesting, dependent upon the
Legacy TUR rank among the Peer Group).
Step 2:
50% of the performance-based award will be a function of the Legacy TUR and the
percentile rank of the Partnership among a group of MLPs included in the Alerian
MLP Index (such group of MLPs as determined by the compensation committee,
excluding publicly traded general partners of MLPs and shipping companies) (the
“Adjusted Alerian Index”). The percentage of the 50% of the performance-based
award to vest
21
under this Step 2 is
determined within a matrix which ranges from 0% to 100% and will increase from
0% to 100% as the Legacy TUR and the percentile rank of the Legacy TUR among the
Adjusted Alerian Index increases. The applicable Legacy TUR range is from less
than 8% (where no vesting occurs) to more than 20% (where 100% vesting will be
available, dependent upon the percentile rank of the Legacy TUR within the
Adjusted Alerian Index).
Step 3:
The respective award values arrived at by performing the calculations set forth
in Step 1 and Step 2 above will be added to determine the total vested portion
of the performance-based equity award with respect to a particular fiscal
year.
On February 18, 2010, the compensation committee approved the following
phantom unit awards for Mr. Cary Brown, and, with respect to the remaining
executive officers, recommended the following phantom unit awards to the board
and the board approved such awards:
|
|
Phantom Unit Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
Subjective Grant |
|
Objective Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
Subjective |
|
Subjective |
|
Phantom |
|
Objective |
|
Phantom |
Named Executive Officer |
|
|
2009 Salary |
|
Factor (a) |
|
Award |
|
Units (b) |
|
Factor (a) |
|
Units
(c)
|
Cary D. Brown |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
16,193 |
|
150 |
% |
|
25,848 |
Steven H. Pruett |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
80 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
10,962 |
|
120 |
% |
|
17,497 |
Paul T. Horne |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
60 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
7,474 |
|
90 |
% |
|
11,930 |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
50 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
5,855 |
|
75 |
% |
|
9,345 |
William M. Morris |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
40 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
|
4,385 |
|
60 |
% |
|
6,999
|
____________________
(a) |
|
Represents percentage of 2009 salary. |
|
(b) |
|
Phantom units vest 1/3 each anniversary. |
|
(c) |
|
Subject to performance criteria. Represents maximum number of
phantom units available to vest in one-third tranches over the next three
years starting February 18, 2011, pending attainment of specified
performance criteria. Unvested phantom units will be
forfeited. |
Subjective or Service-Based Component. Based upon the rationale set forth in “— 2009 Performance Assessment” set forth above,
each executive officer was awarded the maximum level available of the potential
subjective component of equity-based incentive compensation for 2009 (such
maximum available level as set forth in the table above), with the number of
phantom units granted determined by using the 20-day average closing price of
Partnership units prior to February 18, 2010, or $20.07. The only condition to
vesting will be that the award recipient remains in the service of the
Partnership until the end of the respective vesting period. The vesting of
service-based equity-based awards, once granted, is not subject to the
attainment of any performance criteria.
Objective Equity Compensation. The number of phantom units for the objective
component of equity-based compensation was granted as prescribed by the
Compensation Policy at the maximum level, in an amount based on the average
closing price of Partnership units for the 20 trading day period ended the last
trading day prior to January 1, 2010, or $18.86. As set forth in the
Compensation Policy, the objective or performance-based component is granted
each year at the maximum percentage listed in the table above but the amount
vested each year for the three-year vesting period will be determined on each
vesting date in accordance with a formula based on the objective total
unitholder return measures achieved during the fiscal year prior to the
applicable vesting date. If none or only a portion of phantom units of a
particular one-third tranche vest as a result of target levels not being met,
such number of phantom units will be forfeited.
22
Amended and Restated Legacy Reserves LP
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
Long-term incentive compensation awards are administered through our LTIP
adopted in March 2006 and amended and restated on August 17, 2007. The plan is
administered by the compensation committee and permits the grant of awards
resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 2,000,000 units. The purpose of the
plan is to promote the interests of our unitholders by encouraging our
employees, directors and other service providers to acquire or increase their
equity interest in us, thereby giving them the added incentive to work toward
our continued growth and success. The plan permits awards of unit grants,
restricted units, phantom units, unit options, unit appreciation rights,
performance based units and other forms of equity compensation.
As of December 31, 2009, grants of awards, net of forfeitures, covering
945,198 units have been made including 65,116 restricted units, 729,864 unit
options and unit appreciation rights and 105,250 phantom units and 44,968 units
issued to directors. We have awarded unit options (until 2007) and phantom units
as the primary forms of equity-based compensation. We selected these forms
because of the favorable accounting and tax treatment and the expectation by key
employees that part of their compensation would be derived from options to
purchase units in the Partnership.
Unit option awards have been tied to the performance of our named
executive officers in expanding the business and increasing the cash flow
available for distribution. All unit-based awards we have made have been
time-based. Time-based awards vest in accordance with vesting schedules
determined by our general partner’s board of directors and its compensation
committee. The phantom units we have awarded to our named executive officers in
2009 vest in one-third increments each year over a three-year period. Our belief
is that time-based awards more closely align our executives’ interests with
those of our unitholders by providing a greater incentive for long-term
performance.
Our general partner’s board of directors, or its compensation committee,
in its discretion may terminate, suspend or discontinue the LTIP at any time
with respect to any award that has not yet been granted. Our general partner’s
board of directors, or its compensation committee, also has the right to alter
or amend the LTIP or any part of the plan from time to time, including
increasing the number of units that may be granted, subject to unitholder
approval as required by the exchange upon which the units are listed at that
time. However, no change in any outstanding grant may be made that would
materially impair the rights of the participant without the consent of the
participant.
Unit grants
The LTIP permits the grant of units.
A unit grant is a grant of units that vests immediately upon
issuance.
Restricted Units and Phantom
Units
A restricted unit is a unit that is subject to forfeiture prior to the
vesting of the award. A phantom unit is a notional unit that entitles the
grantee to receive a unit upon the vesting of the phantom unit or, in the
discretion of the compensation committee, cash equivalent to the value of a
unit. The compensation committee may make grants under the plan of restricted
units and phantom units to employees, consultants and directors containing such
terms, consistent with the plan, as the compensation committee shall determine.
The compensation committee will determine the period over which the restricted
units and phantom units granted to employees, consultants and directors will
vest. The compensation committee may base vesting upon the achievement of
specified financial objectives or on the grantee’s completion of a period of
service. In addition, the restricted units and phantom units will vest upon a
change of control of the Partnership or our general partner, unless provided
otherwise by the compensation committee in the award agreement.
If the grantee’s employment, service relationship or membership on the
board of directors terminates for any reason, the grantee’s restricted units and
phantom units will be automatically forfeited unless, and to the extent, the
compensation committee provides otherwise in the award agreement or waives (in
whole or in part) any such forfeiture. Units to be delivered in connection with
the grant of restricted units or upon the vesting of phantom units may be units
acquired by us on the open market, or from any other person, or we may issue new
units, or any combination of the foregoing. Our general partner is entitled to
reimbursement by us for the cost
23
incurred in acquiring
units. Thus, the cost of the restricted units and the delivery of units upon the
vesting of phantom units will be borne by us. If we issue new units in
connection with the grant of restricted units or upon vesting of the phantom
units, the total number of units outstanding will increase. The compensation
committee, in its discretion, may provide for tandem distribution rights with
respect to restricted units and grant tandem distribution equivalent rights with
respect to phantom units that entitle the holder to receive cash equal to any
cash distributions made on units prior to the vesting of a restricted or phantom
unit.
Unit Options and Unit
Appreciation Rights
The LTIP permits the grant of options covering units and the grant of
unit appreciation rights. A unit appreciation right is an award that, upon
exercise, entitles the participant to receive the excess of the fair market
value of a unit on the exercise date over the exercise price established for the
unit appreciation right. Such excess may be paid in units, cash, or a
combination thereof, as determined by the compensation committee in its
discretion. The compensation committee will be able to make grants of unit
options and unit appreciation rights under the plan to employees, consultants
and directors containing such terms as the committee shall determine consistent
with the plan. Unit options and unit appreciation rights may not have an
exercise price that is less than the fair market value of the units on the date
of grant. In general, unit options and unit appreciation rights granted will
become exercisable over a period determined by the compensation committee. In
addition, the unit options and unit appreciation rights will become exercisable
upon a change in control of the Partnership or our general partner, unless
provided otherwise by the committee in the award agreement. The compensation
committee, in its discretion may grant tandem distribution equivalent rights
with respect to unit options and unit appreciation rights.
Upon exercise of a unit option (or a unit appreciation right settled in
units), we will acquire units on the open market or from any other person or we
may issue new units, or any combination of the foregoing. If we issue new units
upon exercise of the unit options (or a unit appreciation right settled in
units), the total number of units outstanding will increase, and our general
partner will pay us the proceeds it receives from an optionee upon exercise of a
unit option. The availability of unit options and unit appreciation rights is
intended to furnish additional compensation to employees, consultants and
directors and to align their economic interests with those of
unitholders.
Unit Option
Practices
Although our LTIP permits us to award options under a variety of
circumstances, we have not granted unit options since early 2007 and do not
anticipate granting any further unit options. We have not back-dated any option
awards. The option grants we have made to date had an exercise price that
corresponded with the offering price to purchasers of our units in a private
offering we conducted in March 2006, the price at which our units traded on the
Portal Market, the price to the public of our units in our January 2007 initial
public offering, or the market value of our units at the close of trading on the
date of the grant. Any option grants we may make in the future will have an
exercise price equal to the market value of our units at the close of trading on
the date of the grant. We have chosen to replace the use of unit options in the
future with unit appreciation rights to reduce the administrative costs
associated with unit options.
Perquisites and Other Personal
Benefits
We maintain a 401(k) plan. The plan permits eligible full-time employees,
including named executive officers, to make voluntary, pre-tax contributions to
the plan up to a specified percentage of compensation, subject to applicable tax
limitations. We may make a discretionary matching contribution to the plan for
each eligible employee equal to 4.0% of an employee’s annual compensation not in
excess of $230,000 for 2008, and equal to 6.0% of an employee’s annual
compensation not in excess of $245,000 for 2009 and 2010, subject to applicable
tax limitations. Eligible employees who elect to participate in the plan are
generally vested in any matching contribution after commencement of employment
with the company. The plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code so that contributions to the plan, and income earned
on plan contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the
plan, and so that contributions, if any, will be deductible when
made.
24
We maintain an employee benefit plan that provides our employees with the
opportunity to enroll in our health, dental and life insurance plans. We pay all
of our employees’ health and life insurance premiums. Our dental plan requires
the employee to pay a portion of the premium, with the company picking up the
remainder. We provide these benefits so that we will remain competitive in the
employment market and offer the benefits to all employees on the same
basis.
The compensation committee approved the following grants of phantom units
with associated DERs, which were granted, in accordance with the compensation
policy in effect for 2008, to our named executive officers on January 29, 2009,
with respect to the declared distribution of $0.52 per unit ($2.08 on an
annualized basis) with respect to the fourth quarter of 2008:
|
|
Phantom Units |
|
|
with associated |
Named Executive Officer |
|
|
DERs |
Cary D. Brown |
|
11,760 |
Steven H. Pruett |
|
11,760 |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
9,800 |
Paul T. Horne |
|
9,800 |
William M. Morris |
|
5,880 |
The phantom units vest annually in one-third increments, beginning on the
first anniversary of the grant date, over a three-year period.
These grants of phantom units with associated DERs were in addition to
the following grants of phantom units with associated DERs that were granted on
February 4, 2008 with respect to the declared distribution of $0.45 per unit
($1.80 on an annualized basis) with respect to the fourth quarter of
2007:
|
|
Phantom Units |
|
|
with associated |
Named Executive Officer |
|
|
DERs |
Cary D. Brown |
|
6,720 |
Steven H. Pruett |
|
6,720 |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
5,600 |
Paul T. Horne |
|
5,600 |
William M. Morris |
|
3,360 |
These phantom units also vest annually in one-third increments, beginning
on the first anniversary of the grant date, over a three-year period. One third
of each of these phantom unit grants vested on February 4, 2009.
Unit Ownership Guidelines
We do not currently have any policy or guideline that requires a
specified ownership of our units by our directors or executive officers or unit
retention guidelines applicable to equity-based awards granted to directors and
executive officers. Although we do not have a policy requiring ownership, each
of our named executive officers directly or indirectly owns units.
As of December 31, 2009, our named executive officers as a group
beneficially owned 6,189,216 units and options to acquire 93,320 units. If all
options were exercised, our named executive officers would have beneficially
owned approximately 15.7% of our 40,070,201 issued and outstanding units. See
“Executive Compensation — Outstanding Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal Year-End” for
outstanding options held by our named executive officers.
25
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
REPORT
The compensation committee of the board of directors of Legacy Reserves
GP, LLC held six meetings during fiscal year 2009. The compensation committee
has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with
management. Based upon such review, the related discussions and such other
matters deemed relevant and appropriate by the compensation committee, the
compensation committee has recommended to the board of directors of Legacy
Reserves GP, LLC that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in
this proxy statement.
Members of the compensation
committee of the board of directors of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC:
|
Kyle D. Vann (Chairman) |
|
G. Larry Lawrence |
|
William R. Granberry |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation awarded to,
earned by or paid to our named executive officers serving at December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009 and reflects the total compensation paid to the executive officers
of our general partner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit |
|
Option |
|
Incentive
Plan |
|
Deferred |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
Name and Principal
Position |
|
|
Year |
|
($)(a) |
|
($) |
|
($)(b) |
|
($)(c) |
|
($) |
|
Earnings |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
Cary D. Brown |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
216,667 |
|
$ |
161,000 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
22,671 |
(c) |
|
$ |
400,338 |
Chairman of the
Board |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
$ |
184,889 |
|
$ |
106,771 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,901 |
(c) |
|
$ |
603,561 |
and Chief
Executive |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
$ |
408,549 |
|
$ |
107,140 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,342 |
(c) |
|
$ |
904,031 |
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven H. Pruett |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
191,667 |
|
$ |
122,000 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
46,775 |
(d) |
|
$ |
360,442 |
President,
Chief |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
241,667 |
|
$ |
167,444 |
|
$ |
106,771 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,901 |
(d) |
|
$ |
552,783 |
Financial Officer
and |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
$ |
299,269 |
|
$ |
107,140 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,342 |
(d) |
|
$ |
744,751 |
Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
$ |
98,000 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
21,196 |
(e) |
|
$ |
284,196 |
Director,
Executive |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
208,333 |
|
$ |
133,689 |
|
$ |
88,976 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,012 |
(e) |
|
$ |
465,010 |
Vice President
of |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
235,000 |
|
$ |
163,742 |
|
$ |
89,283 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,417 |
(e) |
|
$ |
565,442 |
Business
Development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul T. Horne |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
$ |
112,000 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
21,196 |
(f) |
|
$ |
298,196 |
Executive
Vice |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
213,333 |
|
$ |
147,222 |
|
$ |
88,976 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,212 |
(f) |
|
$ |
483,743 |
President of
Operations |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
$ |
222,650 |
|
$ |
89,283 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57,417 |
(f) |
|
$ |
619,350 |
William M. Morris |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
$ |
102,000 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
51,788 |
(g) |
|
$ |
318,788 |
Vice President,
Chief |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
203,333 |
|
$ |
129,556 |
|
$ |
53,386 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,440 |
(g) |
|
$ |
432,715 |
Accounting Officer
and |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
$ |
128,249 |
|
$ |
53,570 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,421 |
(g) |
|
$ |
443,240 |
Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
(a) |
|
Annual
salary adjustments for 2007 became effective on September 1, 2007. Annual
salary adjustments for 2008 became effective on September 1, 2008. For
2009, executive salaries were kept at the level effective since September
1, 2008. |
|
(b) |
|
Phantom units were granted to officers on February 4, 2008 and
January 29, 2009. The amount shown reflects the grant date fair value of
these awards based upon the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s
authoritative guidance relating to stock compensation. The assumptions
used in calculating these amounts are incorporated by reference to Note 13
– “Unit Based Compensation” to the financial statements
in |
26
|
|
our
annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2010. In the
prior years’ Summary Compensation Table, based on then prevailing rules,
the value of these awards reflected the grant date fair value of the
amounts expensed each year, for financial reporting purposes. On December
16, 2009, the SEC adopted a final rule that requires reporting all stock
and option awards granted during the fiscal year at the full grant date
value. The value for each of the three years in this Summary Compensation
Table reflects the full grant date fair value. |
|
(c) |
|
Reflects for 2007 $8,056 of 401(k) employer matching contributions
and $14,615 of health, life and disability insurance premiums (which are
provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis). Reflects for
2008 $9,200 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $14,395 of health,
life and disability insurance premiums and $13,306 of unit distributions
received by Mr. Brown on his unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009
$14,700 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $13,698 of health, life
and disability insurance premiums and $34,944 of unit distributions
received by Mr. Brown on his unvested phantom units. |
|
(d) |
|
Reflects for 2007 the $9,220 value of perquisites we paid for Mr.
Pruett’s travel to and from our offices in Midland from his former
residence in Houston, $15,273 of packing and moving expenses to move from
Houston to Midland, $7,667 of 401(k) employer matching contributions and
$14,615 of health, life and disability insurance premiums (which are
provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis). Reflects for
2008 $9,200 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $14,395 of health,
life and disability insurance premiums and $13,306 of unit distributions
received by Mr. Pruett on his unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009
$14,700 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $13,698 of health, life
and disability insurance premiums and $34,944 of unit distributions
received by Mr. Pruett on his unvested phantom units. |
|
(e) |
|
Reflects for 2007 $6,600 of 401(k) employer matching contributions
and $14,596 of health, life and disability insurance premiums (which are
provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis). Reflects for
2008 $8,560 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $14,364 of health,
life and disability insurance premiums and $11,088 of unit distributions
received by Mr. McGraw on his unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009
$14,600 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $13,698 of health, life
and disability insurance premiums and $29,119 of unit distributions
received by Mr. McGraw on his unvested phantom units. |
|
(f) |
|
Reflects for 2007 $6,600 of 401(k) employer matching contributions
and $14,596 of health, life and disability insurance premiums (which are
provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis). Reflects for
2008 $8,760 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $14,364 of health,
life and disability insurance premiums and $11,088 of unit distributions
received by Mr. Horne on his unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009
$14,700 of 401(k) employer matching contributions, $13,698 of health, life
and disability insurance premiums and $29,119 of unit distributions
received by Mr. Horne on his unvested phantom units. |
|
(g) |
|
Reflects for 2007 $43,847 of unit distributions received by Mr.
Morris on his unvested restricted units, $5,300 of 401(k) employer
matching contributions and $2,641 of health, life and disability insurance
premiums (which are provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory
basis). Reflects for 2008 $28,414 of unit distributions received by Mr.
Morris on his unvested restricted units, $8,269 of 401(k) employer
matching contributions, $3,104 of health, life and disability insurance
premiums and $6,653 of unit distributions received by Mr. Morris on his
unvested phantom units. Reflects for 2009 $6,080 of unit distributions
received by Mr. Morris on his unvested restricted units, $14,693 of 401(k)
employer matching contributions, $3,176 of health, life and disability
insurance premiums and $17,472 of unit distributions received by Mr.
Morris on his unvested phantom units. |
27
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year
2009
The following table sets forth the payments that may be made under our
LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
Awards: |
|
or Base |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit |
|
Number of |
|
Price of |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Estimated Future Payouts
Under |
|
Awards: |
|
Securities |
|
Option |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Grant |
|
Action |
|
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards |
|
Number |
|
Underlying |
|
Award |
|
of Unit and |
Name |
|
|
Date(a) |
|
Taken(b) |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
of Units(c) |
|
Options |
|
($/Unit) |
|
Option Awards |
Cary D. Brown |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
11,760 |
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
107,140 |
Steven H. Pruett |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
11,760 |
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
107,140 |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
9,800 |
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
89,283 |
Paul T. Horne |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
9,800 |
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
89,283 |
William M. Morris |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
1/29/2009 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
5,880 |
|
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
53,570 |
____________________
(a) |
|
Reflects grants made in fiscal year 2009. |
|
(b) |
|
Reflects the date on which the compensation committee was deemed to
take action in making a grant of unit options. |
|
(c) |
|
Phantom units vest annually in one-third increments beginning on
the first anniversary of their respective grant dates and are payable in
cash or, at the discretion of the compensation committee, in units. For
2009, the numbers granted reflects the subjective portion of the
Compensation Policy. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal
Year-End
The following table reflects all of the outstanding equity awards held by
our named executive officers as of December 31, 2009. All named executive
officers exercised all of their outstanding options on March 11,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Market Value |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
Option |
|
Units That |
|
of Units That |
|
|
Options (#) |
|
Options
(#) |
|
Unearned |
|
Exercise |
|
Expiration |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
Name |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Options (#) |
|
Price ($) |
|
Date (a) |
|
Vested (#)(b) |
|
Vested
($)(c) |
Cary D. Brown |
|
20,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
17.00 |
|
July 16, 2011 |
|
16,240 |
|
$ |
319,441 |
Steven H. Pruett |
|
20,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
17.00 |
|
July 16,
2011 |
|
16,240 |
|
$ |
319,441 |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
20,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
17.00 |
|
July 16, 2011 |
|
13,533 |
|
$ |
266,194 |
Paul T. Horne |
|
20,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
17.00 |
|
July 16,
2011 |
|
13,533 |
|
$ |
266,194 |
William M. Morris |
|
13,320 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
17.00 |
|
July 16, 2011 |
|
8,120 |
|
$ |
159,720 |
____________________
(a) |
|
Options vest one-third annually commencing March 15, 2007 and
expire five years from the grant date of July 17, 2006. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes the phantom units that were granted on February 4, 2008,
which vest annually in one-third increments, beginning on the first
anniversary of the grant date, over a three-year period and the phantom
units that were granted on January 29, 2009, which vest annually in
one-third increments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant
date, over a three-year period. |
|
(c) |
|
Reflects the value of phantom units based on the closing price of
our units on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on December 31, 2009 of
$19.67. |
28
Employment Agreements
Through our wholly-owned subsidiary Legacy Reserves Services, Inc. we
have employment agreements with each of our executive officers. These agreements
establish that each of our named executive officers is employed by Legacy
Reserves Services, Inc., and provide for the employment of Mr. Brown as Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. Pruett as President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr.
McGraw as Executive Vice President — Business Development and Land, Mr. Horne as
Vice President — Operations and Mr. Morris as Controller of our general partner.
Mr. Horne is now Executive Vice President of Operations and Mr. Morris is
now Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller. Each of
these agreements became effective upon the completion of our private placement
on March 15, 2006, and is terminable either by the executive or by us at any
time.
Base
Salaries
The employment agreements provide that Messrs. Brown, Pruett, McGraw,
Horne and Morris will receive an annual base salary of $200,000, $175,000,
$150,000, $150,000 and $125,000, respectively. On August 20, 2007, the board of
directors of our general partner approved increased salaries for each of the
named executive officers effective September 1, 2007, as follows: Mr. Brown,
$250,000; Mr. Pruett, $225,000; Mr. McGraw, $195,000; Mr. Horne, $195,000; and
Mr. Morris, $195,000. On August 26, 2008, the board of directors of our general
partner approved increased salaries for each of the named executive officers
effective September 1, 2008, as follows: Mr. Brown, $325,000; Mr. Pruett,
$275,000; Mr. McGraw, $235,000; Mr. Horne, $250,000; and Mr. Morris, $220,000.
On September 21, 2009, at the recommendation of the compensation committee the
board of directors of our general partner determined that the 2009 salary levels
for the named executive officers would remain at the 2008 levels until the
compensation committee and the board had the opportunity to redesign the
executive compensation policy and fully determine 2009 performance. As a result,
the board determined that a decision as to salary levels would be deferred until
the first quarter of 2010. On January 11, 2010, the compensation committee of
our general partner approved an increased salary for Mr. Brown of $364,000
effective March 1, 2010. On February 18, 2010, at the recommendation of the
compensation committee, the board of directors of our general partner approved
increased salaries for each of the other named executive officers effective
March 1, 2010, as follows: Mr. Pruett, $292,000; Mr. McGraw, $242,000; Mr.
Horne, $258,000; and Mr. Morris, $227,000. The employment agreements provide
that each executive officer is entitled to participate in equity and non-equity
incentive programs that we may establish from time to time and incentive
compensation will be paid at the discretion of the board of directors of our
general partner. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Components of
Compensation — Named Executive Officer Compensation.”
Intellectual Property and
Non-Compete Clauses
The employment agreements with each of our named executive officers
require that the executive officer must promptly disclose and assign any
individual rights that he may have in any intellectual property and business
opportunities to us. For purposes of the employment agreements, intellectual
property includes inventions, discoveries, processes, designs, methods,
substances, articles, computer programs, or improvements and business
opportunities include business ideas, prospects, proposals or other
opportunities pertaining to the lease, acquisition, exploration, production,
gathering or marketing of hydrocarbons and related products and the exploration
potential of geographical areas on which hydrocarbon exploration prospects are
located. Under the non-compete provisions of these agreements, the executive
officers are prohibited from engaging or participating, with any person or
entity, in any activity pertaining to the leasing, acquiring, exploring,
producing, gathering or marketing of hydrocarbons during the term of the
executive officer’s employment and the executive officer may not invest in any
other such business unless prior approval is granted in writing by our general
partner’s board of directors. The non-compete provisions limit the executives’
right to engage in these activities for a period of 90 days after termination of
employment in counties where we do business, 90 days in adjacent counties, and
limit investment to $500,000 in publicly traded companies engaged in similar
businesses for a period of one year after termination unless such competitive
activity is approved in writing by a majority of the independent directors of
our general partner’s board of directors. The employment agreements also
prohibit the executive officer from soliciting any of our employees or customers
for two years following termination.
29
The employment agreements prohibit the executive officers from engaging
in or participating in any publicly traded partnership or limited liability
company or privately held company contemplating an initial public offering as a
limited partnership or a limited liability company that is in direct competition
with us for one year following the termination of employment.
The non-compete provisions contained in the employment agreements will
not apply to investments by the executive officers made prior to the effective
date of their respective employment agreements, provided that the investments
were identified in the employment agreement. In addition, the non-compete
provisions will not apply if we terminate the executive officer’s employment
within one year following a change of control.
Severance and Change in Control
Payments
Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements, we may be obligated
to make severance payments to our named executive officers following the
termination of their employment. These benefits are described below under “—
Benefits Payable Upon Termination or Change in Control.”
In the event that any payments to
which any named executive officer is entitled become subject to the excise tax
imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, then the board shall
provide for the payment of, or otherwise reimburse the executive for the amount
of the excise tax. These gross-up payments will be in an amount such that, after
payment by the named executive officer of all taxes, including any income tax or
excise tax imposed on the gross-up payments, the named executive officer retains
an amount equal to the payment before any excise tax is imposed. The gross-up
payments, if applicable, will be in addition to any payments made below under “—
Severance Benefits” or “— Change in Control Benefits.” Additionally, to the
extent any payments to which any named executive officer is entitled is deemed
to constitute non-qualified deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code, then we will have the discretion to adjust the terms of
such payment or benefit as we deem necessary to comply with the requirements of
Section 409A to avoid the imposition of any additional tax or other penalty or
interest with respect to such payment or benefit under Section
409A.
Benefits Payable Upon Termination or Change in
Control
The following table presents, for each named executive officer, the
potential post-employment payments and payments upon a change in control as of
December 31, 2009. Set forth below the table is a description of certain
post-employment arrangements with our named executive officers, including the
severance benefits and change in control benefits to which they are entitled
under their employment agreements.
|
|
|
Before Change in |
|
After Change in |
|
|
|
Control w/o |
|
Control w/o |
|
|
|
Cause or for |
|
Cause or for |
Named Executive Officer |
|
Benefit |
|
|
Good Reason |
|
Good Reason |
Cary D. Brown |
Severance(a) |
|
$ |
650,000 |
|
$ |
975,000 |
|
Bonus(b) |
|
$ |
593,438 |
|
$ |
890,157 |
|
Benefits(c) |
|
$ |
25,512 |
|
$ |
38,268 |
|
Unit Options(d) |
|
$ |
53,400 |
|
$ |
53,400 |
|
Phantom Units(e) |
|
$ |
319,441 |
|
$ |
319,441 |
|
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g) |
|
$ |
386,689 |
|
$ |
586,366 |
Steven H. Pruett |
Severance(a) |
|
$ |
550,000 |
|
$ |
825,000 |
|
Bonus(b) |
|
$ |
466,713 |
|
$ |
700,070 |
|
Benefits(c) |
|
$ |
25,512 |
|
$ |
38,268 |
|
Unit Options(d) |
|
$ |
53,400 |
|
$ |
53,400 |
|
Phantom Units(e) |
|
$ |
319,441 |
|
$ |
319,441 |
|
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g) |
|
$ |
333,460 |
|
$ |
497,461 |
30
|
|
|
|
Before Change in |
|
After Change in |
|
|
|
|
Control w/o |
|
Control w/o |
|
|
|
|
Cause or for |
|
Cause or for |
Named Executive Officer |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Good Reason |
|
Good Reason |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
Severance(a) |
|
$ |
470,000 |
|
$ |
705,000 |
|
|
Bonus(b) |
|
$ |
297,431 |
|
$ |
446,147 |
|
|
Benefits(c) |
|
$ |
25,512 |
|
$ |
38,268 |
|
|
Unit Options(d) |
|
$ |
53,400 |
|
$ |
53,400 |
|
|
Phantom Units(e) |
|
$ |
266,194 |
|
$ |
266,194 |
|
|
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g) |
|
$ |
259,985 |
|
$ |
384,760 |
Paul T. Horne |
|
Severance(a) |
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
$ |
750,000 |
|
|
Bonus(b) |
|
$ |
369,872 |
|
$ |
554,808 |
|
|
Benefits(c) |
|
$ |
25,512 |
|
$ |
38,268 |
|
|
Unit Options(d) |
|
$ |
53,400 |
|
$ |
53,400 |
|
|
Phantom Units(e) |
|
$ |
266,194 |
|
$ |
266,194 |
|
|
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g) |
|
$ |
285,865 |
|
$ |
426,759 |
William M. Morris |
|
Severance(a) |
|
$ |
440,000 |
|
$ |
660,000 |
|
|
Bonus(b) |
|
$ |
257,805 |
|
$ |
386,708 |
|
|
Benefits(c) |
|
$ |
17,904 |
|
$ |
26,856 |
|
|
Unit Options(d) |
|
$ |
35,564 |
|
$ |
35,564 |
|
|
Phantom Units(e) |
|
$ |
159,720 |
|
$ |
159,720 |
|
|
Estimated Tax Gross-Ups(f)(g) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
____________________
(a) |
|
If
terminated without cause, or executive terminates with good reason,
executive is entitled to an amount equal to two years’ annual salary
payable in 24 monthly payments, or three years’ annual salary if
termination occurs within one year of a change of control. |
|
(b) |
|
Executives are entitled to an average of bonus paid over past two
years plus the pro-rata bonus earned in the year of termination but unpaid
at the time of termination. |
|
(c) |
|
Executives are entitled to COBRA benefits for the shorter of the
severance period or the time at which executive receives substantially
similar benefits from a subsequent employer. |
|
(d) |
|
Reflects the market value on December 31, 2009 of the 20,000 unit
options granted on July 17, 2006, all of which are still outstanding at
December 31, 2009 except in the case of Mr. Morris who had 13,320 unit
options outstanding. On March 11, 2010, all executive officers exercised
their outstanding unit options in full. |
|
(e) |
|
Reflects the market value on December 31, 2009 of the unvested
phantom units granted on February 4, 2008 and January 29,
2009. |
|
(f) |
|
Assumes a federal income tax rate of 35%, an excise tax rate under
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 20% and a Medicare tax rate
of 1.45% and that no payments will constitute “reasonable compensation”
under Section 280G(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. |
|
(g) |
|
Assumes that the executive is entitled to a full reimbursement by
the Partnership of (i) any excise taxes that are imposed upon the
executive as a result of a change in control, (ii) any income and excise
taxes that are imposed upon the executive as a result of reimbursement of
the excise tax amount and (iii) any additional income and excise taxes
that are imposed upon executive as a result of the reimbursement to the
executive of any excise or income taxes. |
31
Severance
Benefits
Under the employment agreements, we may be obligated to make severance
payments following the termination of each executive officer’s employment if we
terminate him without cause or he terminates his employment for good reason,
subject to certain cure periods. “Cause” is defined under each employment
agreement as:
- the executive officer’s conviction
of or plea of nolo contendere to any felony or crime or offense
causing substantial harm to the
Partnership, general partner, or its direct or indirect subsidiaries, or
involving acts of theft, fraud,
embezzlement, moral turpitude or similar conducts;
- the executive officer’s repeated
intoxication by alcohol or drugs during the performance of his
duties;
- the executive officer’s
malfeasance in the conduct of the executive’s duties including, but not
limited to, willful and
intentional misuse or diversion of any funds, embezzlement or fraudulent or
willful material misrepresentations or concealments on any written
reports;
- the executive officer’s material
failure to perform the duties of his employment consistent with his
position, expressly including the
provisions of the employment agreements or material failure to follow
or comply with the reasonable and
lawful written directives of the board;
- a material breach of the
employment agreement; or
- a material breach by the executive
officer of written policies of the Partnership, the general partner, or
any of our direct or indirect
subsidiaries.
Each named executive officer will have a 15 day cure period prior to
termination for cause under these agreements.
“Good reason” is defined under each
employment agreement as:
- a reduction in the executive
officer’s base salary;
- the relocation of the executive
officer’s primary place of employment to a location more than 20 miles
from Midland, Texas;
or
- any material reduction in the
executive officer’s title, authority or responsibilities.
If the employment of any named executive officer is terminated by us for
cause or by the executive officer without good reason, we are not obligated to
make any severance payments to the executive officer. The amount that an
executive officer is entitled to receive upon a termination of his employment by
us without cause or by the executive officer with good reason is based on the
executive officer’s salary and his incentive compensation. Under the severance
provisions of each executive officer’s employment agreement, they are each
entitled to severance pay in the amount of two years’ of annual base salary
payable monthly at the highest rate in effect at any time during the 36 month
period prior to termination, a lump sum payment equal to the average annual
bonus of the two years preceding the termination and an amount equal to the
executive’s pro-rata bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs,
such pro-rata bonus amount to be paid in a lump sum within 30 days following the
date of termination. In addition, the executive officers are entitled to the
full costs of the executive’s COBRA continuation coverage for the shorter of the
severance period or the time when the executive receives substantially similar
benefits from a subsequent employer. In addition, Messrs. Brown and McGraw would
have the right to exercise one demand registration right each.
Change in Control
Benefits
Pursuant to the employment agreements, we may be required to make
payments to named executive officers upon a change in control, which occurs upon
any of the following:
- the acquisition by any individual
or entity of beneficial ownership of 35% or more of either (i) the
then-outstanding equity
interests of the Partnership or (ii) the combined voting power of the
then-outstanding voting
securities of the Partnership entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors, provided
32
that the following will not constitute a change of control: any
acquisitions from or by the Partnership; any acquisition by a Partnership
employee benefit plan; any business combination (x) where persons owning more
than 50% of the outstanding equity interests in the Partnership own
substantially the same percentages of the entity resulting from such business
combination, (y) where no person owns more than 35% of the combined entity,
except to the extent such ownership existed prior to the combination, or (z) any
combination where at least a majority of the members of the board of the
combined entity were also members of board of directors of the Partnership’s
general partner at the time of initial execution of any acquisition agreement;
- where individuals who constitute
the board at the time of the agreement cease to constitute at least a
majority of the board, unless
an individual becoming a director subsequent to the date of the agreement
was approved by a vote of at
least a majority of the directors then comprising the board, excluding any
individual whose election
occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election
contest;
- consummation of a reorganization,
merger, statutory share exchange or consolidation or similar corporate transaction involving the
Partnership or any of its subsidiaries, a sale or other disposition of
all assets or equity interests
of another entity by the Partnership or any of its subsidiaries unless all or
substantially all of the
individuals and entities that were the beneficial owners of the outstanding
equity and voting securities
immediately prior to such transaction beneficially own more than 50% of the
then-outstanding equity
interests and the combined voting power of the then-outstanding voting
securities entitled to vote
after such business transaction in substantially the same proportions as their
ownership immediately prior to
such transaction, no person beneficially owns 35% or more of the entity
resulting from such
transaction, except to the extent that such ownership existed prior to the
transaction, and at least a
majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation or
equivalent body of any other
entity resulting from such transactions were members of the board at the time
of the execution of the initial
agreement or of the action of the board providing for such transaction;
or
- consummation of a complete
liquidation or dissolution of the Partnership.
If a termination without cause or by the executive officer with good
reason occurs within one year following a change in control, the executive
officer will be entitled to a payment of 36 months of his annual base salary
determined at the highest rate in effect at any time during the 36 month period
prior to termination, payable in a lump sum within 30 days. In addition, the
executive will be entitled to receive the average annual bonus of the two years
preceding the termination, an amount equal to the executive’s pro-rata bonus for
the fiscal year in which the termination occurs (such pro-rata bonus amount to
be paid in a lump sum within 30 days following the date of termination) and the
full costs of the executive’s COBRA continuation coverage for the shorter of the
severance period or the time when the executive receives substantially similar
benefits from a subsequent employer.
Option Exercises and Units Vested in
2009
None of our named executive officers exercised unit options during 2009.
On February 4, 2009, one-third of the Phantom units granted to the named
executive officers on February 4, 2008 vested.
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Unit Awards |
|
|
Number of Units |
|
|
|
Number of Units |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired On |
|
Value Realized |
|
Acquired On |
|
Value Realized |
|
|
Exercise |
|
On Exercise |
|
Vesting |
|
On Vesting |
Name |
|
|
(#) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
($)(a) |
Cary D. Brown |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,240 |
|
$ |
27,121 |
Steven H. Pruett |
|
— |
|
— |
|
2,240 |
|
$ |
27,121 |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
— |
|
— |
|
1,867 |
|
$ |
22,647 |
Paul T. Horne |
|
— |
|
— |
|
1,867 |
|
$ |
22,647 |
William M. Morris |
|
— |
|
— |
|
12,813 |
|
$ |
120,334 |
____________________
(a) |
|
Represents the cash payments made to each of the named executive
officers upon vesting of the limited 1/3 tranche of the February 4, 2008
phantom unit grant, except that in the case of Mr. Morris, it also
includes the $106,748 of value, not cash, he realized on March 14, 2009
when 11,693 restricted units granted on March 15, 2006
vested. |
33
Equity Compensation Plan
Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2009 with
respect to the units that may be issued under our existing equity compensation
plans.
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon |
|
Exercise Price of |
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
Exercise of |
|
Outstanding |
|
Remaining Available
For |
|
|
Outstanding Options, |
|
Options, Warrants |
|
Future Issuance
Under |
Plan Category |
|
|
Warrants and Rights(b) |
|
and Rights |
|
Equity Compensation
Plan |
Equity compensation plans approved
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
security holders |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
Equity compensation plans not approved
by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
security holders(a) |
|
784,962 |
|
$ |
19.23 |
|
1,006,649 |
Total |
|
784,962 |
|
$ |
19.23 |
|
1,006,649 |
____________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Please
read “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Components of Compensation —
Equity-Based Incentive Compensation” for a description of the material
features of the plan, including the awards that may be granted under the
plan. This plan did not require approval by our limited partners since it
was adopted prior to our initial public offering. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes phantom units, unit options and Unit Appreciation Rights.
These phantom units will be settled in cash unless the compensation
committee determines that they should be settled in units. These UARs will
be settled in cash or, at the discretion of the compensation committee, in
units. |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Officers or employees of our general partner and its affiliates who also
serve as directors of our general partner did not receive additional
compensation for their board service in 2009. In accordance with this policy,
neither Cary D. Brown nor Kyle A. McGraw received any compensation for their
service as a director in 2009. Each non-employee director and independent
director was entitled to receive an annual retainer of $40,000 and up to $1,000
for each board of directors and committee meeting less than one hour and $1,500
for each board of directors and committee meeting in excess of one hour for each
meeting in excess of the four quarterly meetings scheduled each year.
Each non-employee director receives an annual grant of units valued at
$50,000, generally corresponding to the service period between each annual
election of the board members. In accordance with this policy, Messrs. Dale A.
Brown, Granberry, Lawrence, Sullivan, and Vann received grants of 3,227 units on
August 20, 2009 for their service on our general partner’s board of directors
during the period of May 2009 to May 2010.
In addition to the annual retainer and units paid to board members, the
chairmen of our audit, conflicts, compensation, and nominating and governance
committees each received an annual retainer for their additional service. For
2009, Mr. Lawrence received $25,000 as chairman of the audit committee, Mr.
Sullivan received $5,000 as chairman of the conflicts committee, Mr. Granberry
received $10,000 as chairman of the nominating and governance committee, and Mr.
Vann received $15,000 as chairman of the compensation committee. In connection
with the review of the proposal of Apollo Management VII, LP to acquire all of
the Partnership’s outstanding units, each member of the conflicts committee that
received a monthly retainer fee in addition to a fee for each meeting attended.
For each of the months of March, April, May and June 2009, Messrs. Granberry,
Lawrence and Vann received a $12,500 retainer fee and Mr. Sullivan received a
$17,500 retainer fee. Additionally, each director received $38,000 for his attendance at the
conflicts committee meetings held during the months of March, April, May and
June 2009.
34
Our general partner’s directors are eligible to receive awards under the
LTIP but do not participate in any non-equity incentive plan, pension plan, or
deferred compensation plan. Each non-employee director and independent director
is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings
of the board of directors or committees. Each director will be indemnified by us
for actions associated with being a director to the fullest extent permitted
under Delaware law.
The following table sets forth the
aggregate compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our general partner’s
directors during 2009.
Director Compensation for the 2009 Fiscal
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned |
|
Unit |
|
Option |
|
Incentive Plan |
|
Deferred |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
in Cash ($)(a) |
|
($)(b) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
Earnings |
|
($) |
|
($) |
Dale A. Brown |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
56,500 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
106,500 |
William R. Granberry |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
166,500 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
216,500 |
G. Larry Lawrence |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
230,000 |
William D. Sullivan |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
172,500 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
222,500 |
Kyle D. Vann |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
162,500 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
$ |
212,500 |
____________________
(a) |
For 2009, Mr.
Lawrence received $25,000 as chairman of the audit committee, Mr. Sullivan
received $5,000 as chairman of the conflicts committee, Mr. Granberry
received $10,000 as chairman of the nominating and governance committee,
and Mr. Vann received $15,000 as chairman of the compensation committee.
Each member of the conflicts committee received a monthly retainer fee in
addition to a fee for each meeting attended. For each of the months of
March, April, May and June 2009, Messrs. Granberry, Lawrence and Vann
received a $12,500 retainer fee and Mr. Sullivan received a $17,500
retainer fee. Additionally, each member of the special conflicts committee
received a total of $38,000 for his attendance at the conflicts committee
meetings held during the months of March, April, May and June
2009. |
|
(b) |
On August 20,
2009, each non-employee director was awarded an annual unit grant valued
at $50,000, or 3,227 units. |
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers
The following table shows information for the executive officers of our
general partner.
Name |
|
|
Age |
|
Position with Legacy Reserves GP,
LLC |
Cary D. Brown |
|
43 |
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board |
Steven H. Pruett |
|
48 |
|
President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
Kyle A. McGraw |
|
50 |
|
Director, Executive Vice President of
Business Development and Land |
Paul T. Horne |
|
48 |
|
Executive Vice President of Operations |
William M. Morris |
|
57 |
|
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
and Controller |
Officers of our general partner serve at the discretion of the board of
directors. None of our executive officers and directors are related except for
Dale A. Brown and Cary D. Brown, who are father and son.
Cary D. Brown is Chairman of the board of directors of our
general partner and Chief Executive Officer of our general partner and has
served in such capacities since our founding in October 2005. Prior to October
2005, Mr. Brown co-founded two businesses, Moriah Resources, Inc. and Petroleum
Strategies, Inc. Moriah Resources, Inc. was formed in 1992 to acquire oil and
natural gas reserves. Petroleum Strategies, Inc. was formed in 1991 to serve as
a qualified intermediary in connection with the execution of Section 1031
transactions for major oil companies, public independents and private oil and
natural gas companies.
35
Mr. Brown has served as Executive Vice President of Petroleum Strategies,
Inc. since its inception in 1991. Mr. Brown served as an auditor for Grant
Thornton in Midland, Texas from January 1990 to June 1991 and for Touche Ross in
Houston, Texas from June 1989 to December 1990. In 1995, Mr. Brown also
co-founded and organized with Mr. Dale Brown, The Executive Oil Conference,
which is held in Midland, Texas and draws over 300 oil and natural gas industry
professionals each year. Mr. Brown has a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree, with honors, from Abilene Christian University. Mr. Brown has 20 years
of experience in the oil and natural gas industry with 18 years of experience in
the Permian Basin.
Steven H. Pruett is President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of our general partner and has served as President and Chief Financial
Officer since our founding in October 2005. From January 2005 until he joined
our general partner, Mr. Pruett served as a Managing Director at Quantum Energy
Partners, a private equity group focused in the energy industry. From August
2004 to December 2004, Mr. Pruett was the President of PSI Management LLC, where
his focus was investing in oil and natural gas projects in the United States.
From June 2002 to July 2004, Mr. Pruett was the President of Petroleum Place and
its subsidiary, P2 Energy Solutions, an acquisition and divestment advisor and
accounting and land software systems developer serving over 100 public oil and
natural gas companies. From June 2001 to June 2002, Mr. Pruett was employed by
First Permian as its President and Chief Executive Officer until its sale to
Energen Corporation. From April 2000 to May 2001, Mr. Pruett served as a Vice
President of Enron North America Corp., where he managed 12 active oil and
natural gas joint ventures and served as chairman of CGAS, an Appalachian oil
and natural gas company. From April 1995 to March 2000, Mr. Pruett was President
and Chief Executive Officer of First Reserve Oil & Gas Co., a Permian Basin
and Oklahoma oil and natural gas property acquisition and development company.
Mr. Pruett has a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering, with high
honors, from the University of Texas and a Master of Business Administration
degree from Harvard Business School where he was a Baker Scholar. Mr. Pruett has
26 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry with 21 years of
experience in the Permian Basin.
Kyle A. McGraw is a member of the board of directors of our
general partner and also serves as the Executive Vice President of Business
Development and Land of our general partner and has served in such capacities
since our founding in October 2005. Mr. McGraw joined Brothers Production
Company in 1983, and has served as its General Manager since 1991 and became
President in 2003. During his 23-year tenure at Brothers Production Company, Mr.
McGraw has served in numerous capacities including reservoir and production
engineering, acquisition evaluation and land management. Mr. McGraw has a
Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas Tech University.
Mr. McGraw has 27 years of experience in the oil and natural gas industry in the
Permian Basin.
Paul T. Horne is Executive Vice President of Operations of
our general partner and has served in such capacity since our founding in
October 2005. From January 2000 to the present, Mr. Horne has served as
Operations Manager of Moriah Resources, Inc. From January 1985 to January 2000,
Mr. Horne worked for Mobil E&P U.S. Inc. in a variety of petroleum
engineering and operations management roles primarily in the Permian Basin. Mr.
Horne has a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from Texas
A&M University. Mr. Horne has 26 years of experience in the oil and natural
gas industry with 24 years of experience in the Permian Basin.
William M. Morris is Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
and Controller of our general partner and has served in such capacity since our
founding in October 2005. From January 2000 until he joined our general partner
in October 2005, Mr. Morris served as Financial Reporting Manager of Titan
Exploration Inc. (from January 2000 through May 2000) and continued in that
position upon Titan Exploration Inc.’s merger with the Permian Basin Business
Unit of Unocal to form Pure Resources, Inc. (from May 2000 to January 2003) and
most recently as a Financial Manager for Pure Resources, Inc. (from February
2003 to September 2005). Mr. Morris is a certified public accountant. Mr. Morris
has a Bachelor of Science degree in Applied Mathematics, with honors, from the
School of Engineering and Applied Science of the University of Virginia and a
Master of Business Administration degree from Colgate Darden Graduate School of
Business Administration of the University of Virginia. Mr. Morris has 29 years
of experience in the oil and natural gas industry with 28 years of experience in
the Permian Basin.
36
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our units as
of April 1, 2010 for:
- each person known by us to be a
beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding units;
- each of the directors of our
general partner;
- each named executive officer of
our general partner; and
- all directors and executive
officers of our general partner as a group.
The amounts and percentage of units
beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing
the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the
SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person
has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the
voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to
dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also
deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a
right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days of April 1, 2010. Under
these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same
securities, and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to
which he has no economic interest.
Except as indicated by footnote, to
our knowledge the persons named in the table below have sole voting and
investment power with respect to all units shown as beneficially owned by them,
subject to community property laws where applicable.
Percentage of total units
beneficially owned is based on 40,070,201 units outstanding as of April 1, 2010.
The business address for the beneficial owners listed below is 303 W. Wall,
Suite 1400, Midland, Texas 79701.
|
Units Beneficially
Owned |
|
|
Number |
|
Percentage |
|
Name of Beneficial
Owner |
|
|
|
|
Moriah Properties,
Ltd.(a) |
4,391,408 |
|
10.6 |
% |
Brothers Production
Properties, Ltd. |
2,356,199 |
|
5.9 |
|
Brothers Production
Company, Inc.(b) |
2,546,720 |
|
6.4 |
|
Directors and Officers |
|
|
|
|
Dale A.
Brown(c) |
5,527,713 |
|
13.8 |
|
Cary D.
Brown(d)(e) |
5,379,345 |
|
13.4 |
|
William R.
Granberry |
14,810 |
|
* |
|
Kyle A.
McGraw(d)(f) |
374,386 |
|
* |
|
Kyle D. Vann |
53,227 |
|
* |
|
William D.
Sullivan |
17,227 |
|
* |
|
G. Larry
Lawrence |
9,227 |
|
* |
|
Steven H.
Pruett(d)(g) |
301,666 |
|
* |
|
Paul T.
Horne(d)(h) |
128,742 |
|
* |
|
William M.
Morris(d) |
5,077 |
|
* |
|
All directors and
executive officers as a group (10 persons) |
7,386,340 |
|
18.4 |
% |
____________________
*
|
Percentage of
units beneficially owned does not exceed 1%.
|
|
|
(a) |
1,500,000 units
are pledged as collateral pursuant to a customary brokerage
arrangement. |
|
(b) |
Brothers
Production Company, Inc., in its capacity as general partner of Brothers
Production Properties, Ltd., is deemed to beneficially own the units held
by Brothers Production Properties, Ltd. as well as 190,521 units it holds
directly. |
37
(c) |
Mr. Dale A. Brown
is deemed to beneficially own 33,672 units owned by Moriah Resources, Inc.
and the 4,391,408 units held by Moriah Properties, Ltd., as well as
542,281 units held by DAB Resources, Ltd. Mr. Dale A. Brown and Mr. Cary
D. Brown share voting and investment power with respect to the units held
by Moriah Properties, Ltd. and Moriah Resources, Inc. Mr. Dale A. Brown
directly owns 560,3352 units. |
|
(d) |
Does not include
grants of 52,121 phantom units to Cary D. Brown, grants of 38,539 phantom
units to Steven H. Pruett, grants of 23,601 phantom units to Kyle A.
McGraw, grants of 27,805 phantom units to Paul T. Horne and grants of
16,424 phantom units to William M. Morris. |
|
(e) |
Mr. Cary D. Brown
is deemed to beneficially own 33,672 units owned by Moriah Resources, Inc.
and the 4,391,408 units held by Moriah Properties, Ltd. Mr. Dale A. Brown
and Mr. Cary D. Brown share voting and investment power with respect to
the units held by Moriah Properties, Ltd. and Moriah Resources, Inc. Mr.
Cary D. Brown directly owns 954,265 units. |
|
(f) |
Mr. McGraw is
deemed to beneficially own the 374,386 units held by Kyle A. McGraw Family
Holdings, Ltd. |
|
(g) |
Mr. Pruett is
deemed to beneficially own the 296,935 units held by SHP Capital
LP. |
|
(h) |
Mr. Horne is
deemed to beneficially own the 121,684 units held by H2K Holdings,
Ltd. |
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of equity
interests of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC:
Name of Beneficial
Owner |
|
Equity Interest |
|
Dale A. Brown(a) |
61.7 |
% |
Cary D. Brown(a)(b) |
61.7 |
|
Kyle A. McGraw |
— |
|
William R. Granberry |
— |
|
Steven H. Pruett |
2.2 |
|
Kyle D. Vann |
— |
|
William D. Sullivan |
— |
|
G. Larry Lawrence |
— |
|
Paul T. Horne |
0.5 |
|
William M. Morris |
— |
|
All directors and executive officers as
a group (10 persons) |
64.4 |
% |
____________________
(a) |
Includes a 56.6%
equity interest held by Moriah Properties, Ltd. and a 5.1% equity interest
held by DAB Resources, Ltd. |
|
(b) |
Includes a 56.6%
equity interest held by Moriah Properties, Ltd. |
|
(c) |
Owned by SHP
Capital LP, an entity controlled by Mr.
Pruett. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS
Our founding investors, including members of our general partner’s
management team and directors, own an aggregate of 10,560,923 units, which
represents a 26.4% limited partner interest in us. In addition, our general
partner owns less than a 0.1% general partner interest in us.
Distributions and Payments to Our General Partner and Its
Affiliates
The following table summarizes the
distributions and payments made or to be made by us to our general partner and
our founding investors in connection with our formation, ongoing operation and
any liquidation of the Partnership. These distributions and payments were
determined by and among affiliated entities and, consequently, are not the
result of arm’s-length negotiations.
38
Distributions of
available cash to our
general partner and our
founding investors
|
|
We will
generally make cash distributions of approximately 99.9% to the
unitholders pro rata, including our founding investors and members of our
general partner’s management team and directors, as the holders of an
aggregate of 10,560,923 units, and approximately 0.1% to our general
partner.
Assuming we have
sufficient available cash to pay the full amount of our current quarterly
distribution on all of our outstanding units for four quarters, our
general partner would receive an annual distribution of approximately
$38,087 on its approximate 0.1% general partner interest, and our founding
investors, including members of our general partner’s management team and
directors, would receive approximately $22.0 million on their
units.
|
|
|
|
Payments to our
general partner
|
|
Our general
partner is entitled to reimbursement for all expenses it incurs on our
behalf. Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will
determine the expenses that are allocable to us in good
faith.
|
|
|
|
Withdrawal or
removal of our general
partner
|
|
If our general
partner withdraws or is removed, its general partner interest will either
be sold to the new general partner for cash or converted into units, for
an amount equal to the fair market value of that
interest.
|
|
|
|
Distribution Upon
Liquidation
|
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
Upon our
liquidation, the partners, including our general partner, will be entitled
to receive liquidating distributions according to their respective capital
account balances.
|
Transactions with Related
Persons
Office Leases
TCTB Partners, a limited partnership of which Dale A. Brown, Cary D.
Brown and Kyle A. McGraw are limited partners, owns the office building in which
the principal offices of the Moriah Group, Brothers Group and Petroleum
Strategies, Inc. are located. We assumed the existing leases in 2006 for 15,000
square feet of office space. The annual rental payable to TCTB Partners is
$102,528, without respect to property taxes and insurance. We also sublease
3,117 square feet of our space to Petroleum Strategies, Inc. at the same rate
per square foot that we are charged by TCTB Partners.
In August 2006 we entered in to an
additional lease of 20,000 square feet, having an initial five year term with a
five year renewal option, with TCTB Partners. Under this additional lease, we
occupied 10,000 square feet in 2006, and another 10,000 square feet in June
2007. From September 2006 through May 2007, the monthly rent exclusive of
property taxes and insurance was $2,333. From June 2007 through August 2009, the
monthly rent exclusive of property taxes and insurance was $5,833. From
September 2009 through December 2009 the monthly rent exclusive of property
taxes and insurance was $11,667.
Other
Travis McGraw, the brother of Kyle
A. McGraw, Executive Vice President of Business Development and Land and a
member of the board of directors of our general partner, is an employee of the
Partnership serving as our Marketing, Revenue, and Regulatory Reporting
Coordinator. We paid Travis McGraw $124,393 as compensation for his services
during the year ended December 31, 2009. Travis McGraw’s current annual salary
is $110,931 plus a discretionary, non-guaranteed bonus. Additionally, during the
year ended December 31, 2009,
39
we retained Scott
McGraw, also the brother of Kyle McGraw, as an independent contractor to perform
engineering services. We paid Scott McGraw $56,000 during this time as
compensation for his services and expect to pay him approximately $15,000 per
quarter in 2010 for his contract engineering services.
Review, Approval and Ratification of
Transactions with Related Persons
Our partnership agreement contains specific provisions that address
potential conflicts of interest between our general partner and its affiliates,
on one hand, and us and our subsidiaries, on the other hand. Whenever such a
conflict of interest arises, our general partner will resolve the conflict. Our
general partner may, but is not required to, seek the approval of such
resolution from the conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general
partner, which is comprised of independent directors. Our partnership agreement
provides that our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations under
the partnership agreement or its duties to us or to our unitholders if the
resolution of the conflict is:
- approved by the conflicts
committee;
- approved by the vote of a majority
of the outstanding common units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner or any of its
affiliates;
- on terms no less favorable to us
than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated
third parties; or
- fair and reasonable to us, taking
into account the totality of the relationships between the parties
involved, including other transactions
that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us.
If our general partner does not seek
approval from the conflicts committee and the board of directors of our general
partner determines that the resolution or course of action taken with respect to
the conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth in the
third and fourth bullet points above, then it will be presumed that, in making
its decision, the board of directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding
brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the Partnership, the person
bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming such
presumption. Unless the resolution of a conflict is specifically provided for in
our partnership agreement, our general partner or the conflicts committee may
consider any factors it determines in good faith to consider when resolving a
conflict. When our partnership agreement requires someone to act in good faith,
it requires that person to reasonably believe that he is acting in the best
interests of the Partnership, unless the context otherwise
requires.
In addition, our code of ethics
requires that all employees, including employees, officers and members of the
board of directors of our general partner, avoid or disclose any activity that
may interfere, or have the appearance of interfering, with their
responsibilities to us and our unitholders.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION
No current executive officer served
as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other
entity (other than our subsidiaries) that has or has had one or more executive
officers serving as a member of the board of directors of our general partner or
the compensation committee of our general partner.
40
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
BDO Seidman, LLP was our independent registered public accounting firm
for our 2009 audit. In connection with this audit, we entered into an engagement
agreement with BDO Seidman, LLP, which sets forth the terms by which BDO
Seidman, LLP will perform audit services for us. That agreement is subject to
alternative dispute resolution procedures. A representative of BDO Seidman, LLP
will attend our annual meeting. The representative will have the opportunity to
make a statement if he desires to do so and to respond to appropriate
questions.
The audit committee’s policy is to
pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the
independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit
services, audit-related services, and other services. Pre-approval is detailed
as to the specific service or category of service and is subject to a specific
approval.
The aggregate fees for professional
services rendered by our principal accountants, BDO Seidman, LLP, for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 were:
|
Year Ended December
31, |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Audit Fees |
$ |
659,325 |
|
$ |
996,385 |
Audit Related Fees |
$ |
12,150 |
|
$ |
42,885 |
Tax Fees |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
All Other Fees (Executive compensation studies) |
$ |
40,853 |
|
$ |
24,900 |
Total |
$ |
712,328 |
|
$ |
1,064,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the above table, “Audit Fees” are fees we paid for professional
services for the audit of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our
annual report on Form 10-K or for services that are normally provided by our
principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements and fees for Sarbanes-Oxley 404 audit work. “Audit-Related Fees” are
fees billed for assurance and related services in connection with acquisition
transactions and related regulatory filings.
In regard to executive compensation
services, as required by the PCAOB, all services are approved in advance by the
audit committee. All compensation consulting services are provided under the
terms of a separate engagement letter that describes the approved services and
the company’s acceptance of its responsibilities. Under the terms of the
engagement, BDO does not perform management functions or make any management
decisions. The company must designate an individual with suitable skill,
knowledge and experience to oversee the consulting engagement, evaluate the
adequacy and results of the services performed, accept responsibility for the
results of the services and establish and maintain internal controls and monitor
ongoing activities.
41
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR
2009
The audit committee is responsible for overseeing the Partnership’s
financial reporting process, reviewing the financial information that will be
provided to unitholders and others, monitoring internal accounting controls,
selecting our independent auditors and providing to the board of directors of
Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, such additional information and materials as we may
deem necessary to make the board of directors of Legacy Reserves GP, LLC, aware
of significant financial matters. We operate under a written audit committee
charter adopted by the board of directors of Legacy Reserves GP,
LLC.
We have reviewed and discussed the
audited financial statements of the Partnership for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 with management and BDO Seidman, LLP, our independent auditor
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. In addition, we have discussed with
BDO Seidman, LLP the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section
380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.
We also have received the written disclosures and the letter from BDO Seidman,
LLP, as required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526
regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee
concerning independence and we have discussed the independence of BDO Seidman,
LLP with that firm.
We, the members of the audit
committee, are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or
accounting nor are we experts in the fields of accounting or auditing, including
determination of auditor independence. We rely, without independent
verification, on the information provided to us and on the representations made
by management and the independent auditors. Accordingly, our oversight does not
provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained
appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or appropriate
internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting
standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, our considerations
and discussions referred to above do not assure that the audit of our financial
statements has been carried out in accordance with the auditing standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or that the financial statements are
presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Based upon the discussions referred
to above, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that our
audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
|
Members of the
audit committee of the Board of Directors of Legacy Reserves GP,
LLC
G. Larry
Lawrence (Chairman) William D. Sullivan William R. Granberry
|
42
OTHER MATTERS
Required Vote
Only holders of units as of the Record Date will be entitled to vote in
person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. A majority of issued and outstanding
units as of the Record Date represented at the meeting in person or by proxy and
entitled to vote at the meeting will constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business.
Abstentions and broker non-votes
will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum,
but will not be included in vote totals and will not affect the outcome of the
vote. Provided that a quorum is present at the meeting, the director nominees
who receive the greatest number of votes cast for election by unitholders
entitled to vote therefor will be elected directors by plurality
vote.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Under Section 16(a) of the Exchange
Act, directors, certain officers, and beneficial owners of 10% or more of any
class of the Partnership’s units, or Reporting Persons, are required from time
to time to file with the SEC and NASDAQ reports of ownership and changes of
ownership. Reporting Persons are required to furnish the Partnership with copies
of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on its review of forms and
written representations received from Reporting Persons by it with respect to
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, with the exception of a late Form 4 for
Mr. Vann as a result of the erroneous identification of Mr. Vann’s Legacy units
in an automatic dividend reinvestment plan administered by Mr. Vann’s IRA
account administrator which is described in further detail below, the
Partnership believes that all filing requirements applicable to the general
partner’s officers and directors and the Partnership’s greater than 10%
unitholders have been met.
On February 16, 2010, Mr. Vann filed
a Form 5 to report two transactions on September 4, 2009 that resulted in the
subtraction of 974 units representing limited partner interests of Legacy
Reserves LP from the units held in Mr. Vann’s IRA account. The Form 4 dated
August 20, 2009 reported two transactions that occurred on November 13, 2008 and
February 17, 2009 in which the reporting person acquired 535 units and 439
units, respectively, pursuant to an automatic reinvestment of distributions
received on units held in the reporting person’s IRA account. On September 4,
2009, the IRA account administrator unwound the automatic distribution
reinvestments that occurred on November 13, 2008 and February 17, 2009,
crediting the original cash purchase prices of $9.73 per unit and $12.47 per
unit, respectively, to the reporting person’s money market fund. Mr. Vann did
not authorize his IRA account administrator to take such action at such time and
was therefore unable to report such transaction in a timely manner.
Unitholder Proposals
Any unitholder who wishes to submit
a proposal for action to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy
relating to the 2011 annual meeting of unitholders must submit the proposal to
us on or before December 13, 2010. Any such proposals should
be timely sent to our Secretary at 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas
79701. Such proposal must meet all of the requirements of the SEC to be eligible
for inclusion in our 2011 proxy materials. Furthermore, proposals by unitholders
may be considered untimely if we have not received notice of the proposal within
the deadline set under the SEC rules. In no event are limited partners allowed
to vote on matters that would cause the limited partners to be deemed to be
taking part in the management and control of our business and affairs so as to
jeopardize the limited partners’ limited liability under the Delaware limited
partnership act or the law of any other state in which we are qualified to do
business.
Communications with Directors or the Board of
Directors
Unitholders wishing to communicate
with the general partner’s board of directors should send any communication to
our Secretary at 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas 79701. Any such
communication should state the number of units beneficially owned by the
unitholder making the communication. Communications received are distributed to the board or to any individual
director or directors as appropriate, depending upon the directions and the
facts and circumstances outlined in the communication. The board of directors
has directed the Secretary to forward such communication to the full board of
directors or to any
43
individual director or
directors to whom the communication is directed, excluding only any
communication that does not relate to the business or affairs of the Company or
the function or duties of the board of directors or any of its committees, or is
a job inquiry or an advertisement or other commercial solicitation or
communication.
Availability of Annual
Report
The Annual Report to Unitholders of the Partnership for the year ended
December 31, 2009, including audited financial statements, is enclosed with this
proxy statement but does not constitute a part of the proxy soliciting material.
The Partnership will furnish a copy of its Annual Report for the year ended
December 31, 2009, without exhibits, free of charge to each person who forwards
a written request to our Secretary at 303 W. Wall, Suite 1400, Midland, Texas
79701.
44
Using a black ink pen mark your votes with an X as shown
in this example. Please do not write outside the designated
areas.
|
|
x |
Annual Meeting Proxy Card
¨ PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE
PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE.
¨
|
A |
|
Election of Directors – The Board of
Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees
listed.
|
+
|
1. |
|
Nominees to serve a one-year term: |
01 – Cary D. Brown 04 – G. Larry
Lawrence 07 – Kyle D. Vann |
02 – Kyle A. McGraw 05 – William D.
Sullivan |
03 – Dale A. Brown 06 – William R.
Granberry |
o |
|
Mark here to vote FOR all
nominees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Mark here to WITHHOLD vote from all
nominees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
For all EXCEPT – To withhold a vote for one or more
nominees, mark the box to the left and the corresponding numbered box(es)
to the right. |
01 o |
02 o |
03 o |
04 o |
05 o |
06 o |
07 o |
B |
|
Non-Voting
Items Change of Address – Please print new address below
|
|
C |
|
Authorized Signatures – This
section must be completed for your vote to be counted. – Date and Sign
Below Please sign
exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When
signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee,
guardian, or custodian, please give full title.
|
|
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) – Please print date
below. |
|
Signature 1 – Please keep signature
within the box. |
|
Signature 2 – Please keep signature
within the box. |
/ |
/ |
|
|
|
|
¨ PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE
PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE.
¨
|
Proxy – Legacy
Reserves LP
303 W. Wall, Suite 1400
Midland, Texas
79701
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LEGACY RESERVES GP, LLC FOR THE
ANNUAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS OF LEGACY RESERVES LP TO BE HELD ON MAY 12,
2010
The undersigned hereby
appoints Steven H. Pruett and William M. Morris, and each of them, any one of
whom may act without joinder of the other, with full power of substitution,
resubstitution and ratification, attorneys and proxies of the undersigned to
vote all units representing limited partnership interests of Legacy Reserves LP
which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the annual meeting of unitholders
to be held at the Midland Petroleum Club located at 501 W. Wall on Wednesday,
May 12, 2010 at 10:30 a.m., Midland, Texas time, and at any adjournment or
postponement thereof, in the manner stated herein as to the matters set forth in
the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, and in their discretion on any
other matter that may properly come before the meeting.
THIS
PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS MADE HEREON. IF NO
CONTRARY SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THEN THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION
OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED IN ITEM 1 AND, IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES,
WITH RESPECT TO SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE
MEETING.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF LEGACY RESERVES GP, LLC RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION
OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR.
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY
ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS AND THE
PROXY STATEMENT FURNISHED HEREWITH. PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY
PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED, PRE-ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE.
(To be Voted and Signed on
Reverse Side)