Commentary from the sustainability
review panel
P
58
Introduction
Context and strategy
Global priorities and progress
Review processes
AngloGold Ashanti’s ‘Sustainability Report 2011’
demonstrates a significant step forward in how the company
frames and reports on its sustainability challenges and
opportunities. Its focus on a small number of strategic,
material issues is to be commended, alongside the
development of a more integrating lens that views these
issues in country-specific contexts and actions.
Acknowledging the underlying roots of resource nationalism
shows an appreciation of the company’s broader operating
context of under-development and inequality in a number of
resource rich countries during an unprecedented
commodities boom. Furthermore, the company shows
courage in highlighting the need to address the growing
problem of artisanal mining as more than a matter of illegality.
Seeking to report on this more strategic, integrated
approach does raise the bar on what data and analysis are
needed. So whilst the report does provide robust, basic
environmental, social and economic performance targets
and data, there remains more for AngloGold Ashanti to do in
specifying the crucial dynamic linkages between stated
material risks at both global and country levels.
In this early stage of the company’s new approach, the evolving
strategies for addressing risks when stated, at times appear
reactive and at others, not yet fully formed. For example, whilst
the company’s advance of a human rights framework is to be
welcomed, there is a need to clarify its relationship to other
risks faced by the company, as well as to the mitigating actions
and initiatives currently being undertaken in response. Similarly,
while the challenges of artisanal mining and resource
nationalism are clearly highlighted in the report, future reporting
could certainly make clearer the real impact of these issues on
the business, as well as the company’s response – both at a
country and global level.
In this regard, we welcome the positioning of community as
a strategic issue, and would welcome more information on
how the company is contributing towards skills development
and youth employment in its host communities. Continuing
improvements in the reporting process would address some
of these gaps, particularly as AngloGold Ashanti improves
the coherence between its thinking, strategy and practice in
these areas.
AngloGold Ashanti aspires to be the world’s leading mining
company, and clearly sees excellence in sustainability as a
precondition for securing success. As it has expanded
globally, it has established management systems to build the
highest possible quality, consistently, across all parts of
the business.
Yet whilst the report rightly focuses on specific countries and
sites, there is still much to do to facilitate horizontal learning
between operational units, notably on sustainability issues.
Furthermore, although there is much in the report on the
procedures and process of engagement with external
stakeholders, more evidence is required of what has been
learnt from these stakeholders, particularly communities. There
is a need for more diversity of non-corporate ‘voices’ offered in
the report, from employees, communities, or experts and
opinion leaders.
This is the first year that AngloGold Ashanti has engaged an
external group of independent experts to comment on, and
have their views included in, the report. We commend the
company for this step as it provides external stakeholders with
another level of assurance as to the quality of reporting. In
addition, we hope that the process provides useful inputs to
the company as it develops its report and underlying thinking
and practice.
We would in summarising our perspective on this year’s report
commend AngloGold Ashanti for demonstrating both
ambition and progress. To maintain this momentum, we
would like to recommend some further developments in
substance and its communication in future reporting cycles:
•
Greater clarity as to the global responsibilities associated
with being a global company, especially with regard to
employees and communities.
•
Specification of framework and associated metrics for
measuring community impacts and development.
•
Clearly articulated strategy, goals and practice for
advancing leadership in addressing artisanal mining.
•
Inclusion of independently authenticated voices of
employees and communities.