Letter from our Chairman

Fellow shareholders:

Thank you for your investment in ScanSource. On behalf of ScanSource’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), it is my pleasure to invite you to join us at the upcoming 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If you are unable to make the Annual Meeting, I want to encourage you to cast your vote on the items discussed in the Proxy Statement using the attached proxy card.

I would like to take this opportunity to provide you with an update on what the Board has accomplished in 2017.

During fiscal 2017, our Board focused on ensuring that we continued to implement our capital allocation strategy, which is designed to create value for our shareholders. The Board worked to oversee the deployment of capital through organic growth, strategic acquisitions, and share repurchases. One of the highlights of our fiscal 2017 performance is the $95 million of operating cash flow generated over the last twelve months, which is significantly higher than the prior year period. This reflects some working capital efficiency and additional cash flow from acquisitions. Since the last shareholder meeting, we made two acquisitions, the most significant of which was the purchase of POS Portal, a leading distributor of payment devices and services primarily to the SMB market segment. POS Portal brings 17 years of demonstrated success focused solely on the US payments industry channels. We have continued to execute upon our corporate development strategy, completing six acquisitions in the last thirty-six months, and continue to look for opportunities to grow our business in areas that are higher-margin and higher-growth.

In addition to strategic acquisitions, in August 2016, the Board extended our share repurchase program for a second $120 million. In fiscal 2017, we acquired approximately 578,000 shares for approximately $20.3 million and we have approximately $100 million remaining on our existing share repurchase authorization.

We are very pleased that Betty Temple joined our Board effective September 11, 2017. Betty serves as the Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP and, as of November 1, 2017, serves as Co-Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Womble Bond Dickinson, a Global Top 100 law firm. Ms. Temple has a wealth of experience counseling public and private companies on their highest strategic priorities. Her background as a legal advisor to public companies and boards provides our Board with additional expertise in the areas of risk management, corporate governance, acquisitions and securities regulation.

The Board remains deeply committed to a sound governance structure that promotes the best interests of our shareholders. To that end, the Board continues to examine emerging corporate governance trends and best practices. We have corporate governance guidelines to help ensure that the Board is independent from management and appropriately performs its function as the overseer of management, and that the interests of the Board and management align with the interests of our shareholders. We believe that our current leadership structure and corporate governance guidelines ensure effective independent Board leadership and oversight of management. During fiscal 2017, our directors regularly met in executive sessions without the Chief Executive Officer or any other members of management present. Strong independent director leadership also is evidenced by the fact that I am an independent Chairman and all of the Board Committees are comprised solely of, and chaired by, independent directors.

On behalf of ScanSource’s Board and the members of ScanSource’s senior management team, we look forward to seeing you at the upcoming 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement will serve as your guide to the business to be conducted at the meeting this year.

Your vote is important to us. Again, I want to encourage you to participate in the Company’s future by casting your vote on the items discussed in the Proxy Statement. Please vote early by signing and returning your proxy card or by voting via telephone or online as detailed in the Proxy Statement. Thank you for the trust you have placed in us and for your continued support of ScanSource.

Best regards,

Steven R. Fischer

Chairman of the Board

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

December 7, 2017

8:30 a.m., Eastern Standard Time

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of ScanSource, Inc. will be held at our principal executive offices, located at 6 Logue Court, Greenville, South Carolina 29615 on Thursday, December 7, 2017, at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, for the following purposes:

Only shareholders whose names appear of record on our books at the close of business on October 11, 2017 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments thereof.

You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person, but if you are unable to do so, please vote by signing and returning your proxy card or by voting via telephone or online. You are entitled to revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised, and if you attend the Annual Meeting you may also revoke your proxy by voting in person. Voting online, by telephone, by written proxy or voting instruction card will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting regardless of whether you attend in person.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Michael L. Baur

Chief Executive Officer

October 24, 2017

Proxy Summary

Table of Contents

Information Concerning Solicitation and Voting

This Proxy Statement is first being mailed on or about October 24, 2017 to shareholders of ScanSource, Inc. in connection with the solicitation by our Board of Directors of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, December 7, 2017, at 8:30 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, at our principal executive offices, located at 6 Logue Court, Greenville, South Carolina 29615, and any adjournments thereof. The Proxy Statement contains information relating to the proposals to be voted upon at the meeting, the voting process, our Board, the compensation of our “Named Executive Officers”, and certain other information.

The solicitation of proxies is being made by our directors and employees, and the cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. Copies of solicitation materials may be furnished to brokers, custodians, nominees and other fiduciaries for forwarding to beneficial owners of shares of our common stock, and the Company will reimburse the normal handling charges for such forwarding services. Solicitation of proxies may be made by mail, in person, by telephone and by other electronic means, and by our directors, executive officers, and other employees, who will receive no additional compensation for their services.

As used in this Proxy Statement, the terms “ScanSource,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to ScanSource, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

PROPOSALS TO BE CONSIDERED AND VOTE REQUIRED

The following proposals are expected to be voted upon at the 2017 Annual Meeting:

Only shareholders of record on October 11, 2017 (the “record date”) will be entitled to vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting, and each share will be entitled to one vote. At the close of business on the record date, there were 25,499,598 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

All shares of our common stock represented by valid proxies received pursuant to this solicitation, and not revoked before they are exercised, will be voted in the manner specified. If no specification is made, properly executed and returned proxies will be voted (i) “FOR” the director nominees named in this Proxy Statement, (ii) “FOR” approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, (iii) FOR “One Year” on the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, and (iv) “FOR” ratification, on an advisory basis, of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018. Management is not aware of any matters, other than those specified herein, that will be presented for consideration at the 2017 Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly presented for consideration at the 2017 Annual Meeting, the proxies named on the proxy card will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

Our Bylaws provide that the presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the 2017 Annual Meeting and at any adjournments thereof. Signed proxies that withhold authority to vote for directors or reflect abstentions or broker non-votes (as described below) will be counted for purposes of determining if a quorum is present at the 2017 Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present, the shareholders holding a majority of the shares at the meeting, in person or by proxy, have the power to adjourn the meeting; however, if the reconvened meeting is more than 120 days from the date of the original meeting, then we must establish a new record date. At any reconvened meeting at which a quorum is present or represented, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the meeting as originally scheduled.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				1

Proposals to be Considered and Vote Required

Brokers that are members of certain securities exchanges and that hold shares of our common stock in “street name” on behalf of beneficial owners have authority to vote on certain “discretionary” items when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. Under applicable securities exchange rules, our proposal to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is considered a discretionary item. However, proposal numbers one, two and three in this Proxy Statement are considered “non-discretionary” items and brokers cannot vote on these items without instructions, and a “broker non-vote” occurs when brokers do not receive instructions.

Assuming the existence of a quorum at the 2017 Annual Meeting:

HOW TO VOTE

Each shareholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock on all matters presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting. Shareholders do not have the right to cumulate their votes for the election of directors. Shares may be voted by the following procedures:

		Voting In-Person. Shares held directly in your name as the shareholder of record may be voted in person at the 2017 Annual Meeting. If you choose to vote in person at the 2017 Annual Meeting, please bring your proxy card and proof of personal identification. Shares held in street name may be voted in person by you only if you obtain a legal proxy from the shareholder of record giving you the right to vote the shares. If you need directions to the 2017 Annual Meeting, please contact Investor Relations at (864) 286-4892.
		Voting via the Internet. Shares may be voted via the internet. Your voting instructions will be accepted until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on December 6, 2017. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions given.
		Voting via Telephone. Shares may be voted via any touch-tone telephone by following the instructions on your proxy card. Your voting instructions will be accepted until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, on December 6, 2017. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and follow the instructions given.
		Voting via Mail. Shares may be voted via mail by marking, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the postage-paid envelope found in your proxy package.

Even if you currently plan to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting. Submitting your proxy via internet, mobile device, telephone or mail does not affect your right to vote in person at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

2				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Voting of Proxies

VOTING OF PROXIES

By giving your proxy, you grant the right to vote your shares to Michael L. Baur, our Chief Executive Officer, and John Harvey, our Vice President of Worldwide Human Resources. If you return a signed, but unmarked proxy card, your shares will be voted (i) FOR the election of each of the director nominees named herein, (ii) FOR approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, (iii) FOR “One Year” on the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers and (iv) FOR ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018. Management is not aware of any matters, other than those specified herein, that will be presented for action at the 2017 Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting for consideration, the agents named on the proxy card will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

If you are a registered shareholder (meaning a shareholder who holds share certificates issued in his or her name and therefore appears on the share register) and have executed a proxy, your proxy may be revoked at any time prior to such proxy being exercised. Such right of revocation is not limited by or subject to compliance with any formal procedure, but may be accomplished by (i) voting again via the internet, any mobile device or telephone, (ii) requesting, completing and returning a second proxy card bearing a later date, (iii) giving written notice to the Corporate Secretary of the Company, or (iv) by voting in person at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, you should follow the voting instructions you receive from the holder of record to revoke or change your vote.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				3

Corporate Governance

Director Independence

In accordance with the listing standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) and our Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), our Board consists of a majority of independent directors. The Board has determined that all members of the Board, other than Mr. Baur, meet the requirements for being “independent” as defined in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations and NASDAQ listing standards.

The Board maintains an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Governance Committee and a Nominating Committee, each of which is comprised only of independent directors.

In addition, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, executive officers are prohibited from serving as a director of another company that concurrently employs a director of the Company.

Board Leadership Structure

For the past sixteen years, the positions of Chairman of the Board and CEO have been held by separate persons as an aid in the Board’s oversight of management. Our non-executive Chairman of the Board is Mr. Fischer. The duties of the non-executive Chairman of the Board include:

The Board believes that there are advantages to having an independent chairman for matters such as communications and relations between the Board, our CEO and other senior management; in assisting the Board in reaching consensus on particular strategies and policies; and in facilitating robust director, Board and CEO evaluation processes. Our Board currently consists of six non-employee, independent directors and our CEO, Mr. Baur. One of Mr. Fischer’s roles is to oversee and manage the Board and its functions, including setting meeting agendas and presiding over Board meetings. In this regard, Mr. Fischer and the Board in its advisory and oversight roles are particularly focused on overseeing our CEO and senior management in their pursuit and adoption of successful business strategies, risk management policies, and management succession plans. In the event that the Chairman and CEO positions ever are held by the same individual, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide the Board shall appoint a “Lead Independent Director.”

Board and Committee Meetings in 2017

The Board met a total of 16 times during the 2017 fiscal year. Mr. Fischer served as the non-executive Chairman of the Board during the entire fiscal year. Committees of the Board met a total of 14 times during the 2017 fiscal year. All directors attended at least 75% of Board and committee meetings that occurred during their tenure as a director during the 2017 fiscal year. We expect all Board members to attend annual meetings. All of our directors serving at such time attended the 2016 Annual Meeting.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board as a whole actively oversees the risk management of the Company. Risks — the specific financial, operational, business and strategic risks that we face, whether internal or external — are identified by the Board and management together, and then each risk is assigned to either the full Board or a Board committee for oversight in accordance with its charter. Certain strategic and business risks, such as those relating to our products, markets and capital investments, are overseen by the entire Board. The Audit Committee oversees management of market and operational risks that could have a financial impact, or impact financial reporting, such as those relating to internal controls or liquidity. The Nominating Committee and the Governance Committee manage the risks associated with governance issues, such as the independence of the Board, and the Compensation Committee is responsible for managing the risks relating to our executive compensation plans and policies and, in conjunction with the Board, key executive succession. Management regularly reports to the Board or relevant committee on actions that we are taking to manage these risks. In addition, our Board committees annually evaluate compliance with their respective charters, ensuring that the committees are exercising proper oversight.

4				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Director Education

Director Education

Each member of the Board has completed director education programs. Periodically, the Company provides director education with the assistance of external experts on topics relevant to the Company. The Company and each Board member are members of the National Association of Corporate Directors (“NACD”). As members of NACD and through other external director education service providers, the Company and each Board member have access to various programs, materials, reports, and research teams.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has established Guidelines that address various governance matters, including the role, function, responsibilities, size and composition of the Board, Board tenure, service on other public-company boards, conflict of interest issues, executive sessions of non-management directors, review of committee charters and the Board self-evaluation process. Copies of the Guidelines and certain other policies adopted by the Board are available on the “Investors” page of our website, www.scansource.com, under the “Governance” tab.

GENERAL BOARD FUNCTIONS

The Guidelines set forth general functions of the Board, including holding regular and, where appropriate, special meetings, periodically reviewing management’s performance and our organizational structure, reviewing and approving corporate strategy, determining compensation for our Named Executive Officers through the Compensation Committee and awarding equity-based compensation, overseeing our accounting and financial reporting process and audits of our financial statements, and identifying potential candidates for Board membership.

DIRECTOR RESIGNATION POLICY

The Guidelines provide that a director will tender his or her resignation if, in an uncontested election, the director fails to receive a greater number of votes “for” election than votes “withheld” from such election. The Board, on recommendation from the Nominating Committee, will then determine whether to accept the director’s resignation.

RETENTION OF INDEPENDENT ADVISORS

The Guidelines provide that the Board may retain independent advisors when appropriate.

SUCCESSION PLANNING

Our Board engages in an active succession planning process. On an annual basis, with the assistance of our CEO, it reviews the potential in-house candidates for each of the critical senior management positions and identifies areas of growth for those candidates that will best enable them to fill any need that we might have. Where there is not a satisfactory in-house candidate for a position, the Board considers whether outside candidates are likely to be available in a timely manner and whether other alternatives need to be considered.

BOARD TENURE

The Board is elected annually and is not classified.

COMPOSITION OF BOARD

The Board currently consists of seven members. The size of the Board may be increased or decreased by resolution of the Board.

The Guidelines provide that a majority of the Board will at all times be independent. Through the Nominating Committee, the Board will identify potential candidates for Board membership with the objective being that all new, non-management candidates will be independent. The Nominating Committee will confirm the independence of the non-management directors on an annual basis. The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Browning, Fischer, Grainger, Reilly and Whitchurch and Ms. Temple meet the requirements for being “independent” as defined in the NASDAQ listing standards. Mr. Baur is the only management member of the Board.

SERVICE ON OTHER PUBLIC COMPANY BOARDS

A director may serve on only four public boards of directors (including the Company’s Board) and no more than three public company audit committees. The CEO may serve on only three public board of directors (including the Company’s Board). All members of the Board, including the CEO, are compliant with the Guidelines regarding service on boards and audit committees of other public companies.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				5

Corporate Governance Guidelines

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

Pursuant to the Guidelines, independent directors must meet regularly without management present. Our independent directors met three times in executive session during fiscal 2017.

DIRECTOR EVALUATIONS AND REVIEWS

In accordance with the Guidelines, the Board and the Governance Committee conduct annual performance reviews of the Board and its committees. As a part of the evaluation process, the Board and each of the committees meet and discuss self-assessments and corporate governance matters.

CLAW-BACK POLICY

The Company’s claw-back policy applies to certain officers of the Company (a “Covered Officer”), which include all executive officers of the Company (as determined from time to time by the Board or the Compensation Committee), and such other employees who are participants in the Company’s equity incentive plans and cash incentive plans if the Board or the Compensation Committee deems them subject to the policy. Under the policy, if a Covered Officer receives an award under the applicable plan based on financial statements that subsequently are restated in a way that would decrease the amount of the award to which such person otherwise was entitled and the restatement is based in whole or in part on the misconduct of the Covered Officer, the Covered Officer is required to refund to the Company the difference between what he or she received and what he or she should have received. In addition, this policy requires the recoupment of any compensation to the extent otherwise mandated by applicable laws.

ANTI-PLEDGING POLICY

Under the Company’s anti-pledging policy, officers and directors are prohibited from holding Company securities in margin accounts or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan. All executive officers and directors are in compliance with this policy.

ANTI-HEDGING POLICY

The Board has adopted an anti-hedging policy that covers employees, officers and directors of the Company. The policy provides that certain hedging transactions are prohibited by the Company’s employees, officers and directors, although the Company may permit a hedging transaction in limited circumstances if prior approval is obtained for such transaction. No such approval has ever been sought or given. All executive officers and directors are in compliance with this policy.

6				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Corporate Social Responsibility

We are committed to our local communities. Through our philanthropic pursuits and our focus on sustainability, we strive to create better places for our employees and neighbors to work and live.

With a focus on education and workforce training, last year we donated nearly $900,000 to over 64 local non-profit organizations. Our employees and executives also devoted over 2,600 hours of their time during the fiscal year to serve as volunteers in local schools, colleges and universities. These efforts positively impact our business, as we increase community support, provide our employees with greater opportunities for leadership development and training, and improve the job satisfaction of our employees.

This year, ScanSource was honored to once again be named title sponsor of Upstate South Carolina’s largest STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Math) festival, iMAGINE Upstate. The festival is an opportunity for us to reach out to students of all ages and introduce them to our technologies through hands-on activities, while also expanding ScanSource’s reach in the community. In 2017, the event grew to roughly 15,000 attendees, and as one of the biggest community initiatives ScanSource is involved with each year, it was important for our team to grow and expand our exhibit area and influence at the event, as well. After months of planning with an internal marketing and tech team committee, ScanSource created a themed exhibit called ScanSource Future Innovator Training, and presented several activities for kids, from thermal and pan-tilt-zoom cameras to 3D printing and a hands-on barcode scanning game. The Company’s dedication to executing another successful exhibit at iMAGINE was another testament to our culture of teamwork and community involvement.

Additionally, our first Corporate Social Responsibility report has been published and is available on the Company website under the “Investors” tab.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				7

PROPOSAL NUMBER 1 - Election of Directors

The Company intends to nominate each of the individuals named below to serve as members of our Board until their successor is duly elected and qualified at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or, if earlier, their death, resignation or removal. Each of the nominees is currently a director of the Company.

Each of the proposed nominees has consented to stand for election as a member of our Board. We believe that each of our current directors has served our shareholders’ interests well during their tenure as a director and will continue to do so. We believe that the Company and our shareholders benefit from the wide variety of industry and professional experience that characterizes the members of our Board.

The following sets forth certain information regarding the proposed nominees, including each director’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to conclude that each nominee is well-qualified to serve as a member of the Board.

INFORMATION REGARDING NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

8				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Information Regarding Nominees for Director

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				9

Information Regarding Nominees for Director

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” each of the nominees listed above.

10				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

2017 Director Compensation Table

2017 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table provides information regarding the compensation paid to each of our non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.

Cash Retainers

Directors who are not our employees are paid an annual retainer of $70,500. An additional annual retainer of $30,000 is paid, as applicable, to a non-executive Chairman (or acting Chairman) of the Board. An additional annual retainer of $25,000 is paid to the chairman of the Audit Committee, and an additional annual retainer of $15,000 is paid to the chairman of the Compensation Committee. Additional annual retainers of $2,000 are paid to the chairmen of the Nominating Committee and the Governance Committee. Annual service for this purpose relates to the approximate 12-month periods between annual meetings of our shareholders. All directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their services as directors as well as the cost of any director education.

Equity Retainers

Our non-employee directors receive an annual equity retainer (in the form a stock grant of restricted common stock) under the ScanSource, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”). In addition, non-employee directors also may be eligible to receive other awards under our 2013 Plan.

The number of shares of restricted stock subject to a director’s annual restricted stock award is determined by dividing $100,000 by the equity award value per share on the grant date. The equity award value means the value per share based on a 45-day averaging of the fair market value of the common stock over a specified period of time. The date of grant of the annual restricted stock awards is the day following each annual shareholders meeting unless the Board modifies, suspends or delays the grant date because the grant date would not occur during an open “window” for stock transactions under the Company’s insider trading compliance program or if the Board otherwise determines that modification, suspension or delay of the grant date is necessary or appropriate.

A person who first becomes a non-employee director on a date other than a regularly scheduled annual meeting of shareholders will receive a restricted stock award for a pro-rated number of shares of common stock. Restricted stock may not be transferred or sold until it has vested.

Restricted stock granted to directors under the 2013 Plan will vest in full on the day that is six months after the date of grant, or upon the earlier occurrence of (i) the director’s termination of service as a director by reason of death, disability or retirement or (ii) a change in control of the Company. If a director terminates service for any other reason, he or she will forfeit all of his or her right, title and interest in and to the unvested restricted stock as of the date of termination, unless the Board or the Compensation Committee determines otherwise.

Stock Ownership and Retention Policy

Under the equity ownership policy, directors are expected to hold five times their $70,500 annual Board cash retainer in Company securities. The policy also incorporates a retention requirement by requiring such persons to retain 50% of the net shares resulting from the vesting of certain awards until the required ownership under the policy is met. As of the end of the 2017 fiscal year, all directors were in compliance with this policy.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				11

Committees of the Board

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

The Board has standing Audit, Compensation, Governance and Nominating Committees, each of which has a written charter. Copies of the charters for the Board committees, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines, are available on the “Investors” page of our website, www.scansource.com, under the “Governance” tab. The following table reflects the membership of each of the Board’s committees and the Chairman of the Board:

		AUDIT COMMITTEE		COMPENSATION COMMITTEE		GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE		NOMINATING COMMITTEE
Steven R. Fischer*
Michael L. Baur
Michael J. Grainger
John P. Reilly						Chair		Chair
Charles R. Whitchurch		Chair
Peter C. Browning				Chair
Elizabeth O. Temple

*Chairman of the Board

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is currently composed of Chairman Whitchurch and Messrs. Browning, Fischer, Grainger, and Reilly. The functions of the Audit Committee include selecting the independent auditor, reviewing the scope of the annual audit undertaken by our independent auditor and the progress and results of their work, reviewing our financial statements and our internal accounting and auditing procedures and overseeing our internal audit function. The Audit Committee met five times during the 2017 fiscal year. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the definition of independence for audit committee members as set forth in the NASDAQ listing standards and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee meet the requirements of an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in SEC rules and regulations.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is currently composed of Chairman Browning and Messrs. Fischer, Grainger, Reilly and Whitchurch. The functions of the Compensation Committee include reviewing and approving executive compensation policies and practices, reviewing salaries and bonuses for our Named Executive Officers, overseeing our equity-based plans, overseeing compensation risk assessment and considering such other matters as may from time to time be referred to the Compensation Committee by the Board. The Compensation Committee met seven times during the 2017 fiscal year. Each member of the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements for compensation committee members as set forth in the NASDAQ listing standards, the Exchange Act, and the Internal Revenue Code. See “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for a further discussion of the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation.

Governance Committee

The Governance Committee is currently composed of Chairman Reilly and Messrs. Browning, Grainger, Fischer and Whitchurch and Ms. Temple. The functions of the Governance Committee include oversight and responsibility for implementation of the Company’s program for complying with the rules and regulations of the SEC and NASDAQ (in conjunction with the Audit Committee, where necessary or appropriate) as well as other NASDAQ rulemaking initiatives pertaining to corporate governance considerations. The Governance Committee held one committee meeting in the 2017 fiscal year.

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee is currently composed of Chairman Reilly and Messrs. Browning, Fischer, Grainger and Whitchurch and Ms. Temple. The functions of the Nominating Committee include oversight and responsibility for the recruitment and nomination of our directors from time to time including, but not limited to, the nomination of directors for election at each annual meeting of our shareholders. Each member of the Nominating Committee meets the independence requirements as set forth in the NASDAQ listing standards. The Nominating Committee held one committee meeting during the 2017 fiscal year.

12				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Candidates for the Board

CANDIDATES FOR THE BOARD

The Nominating Committee will identify and screen potential nominees for directors, including nominees recommended by shareholders, and recommend nominees to the Board. See “Shareholder Proposals” for a discussion of the Company’s policies for shareholder nominees. The Nominating Committee has not adopted specific objective requirements for service on the Board. Instead, the Nominating Committee will consider various factors in determining whether to recommend to the Board potential new Board members, or the continued service of existing members, including the nominee’s experience and skills and whether such skills or experience are particularly relevant to us; whether the nominee would be an independent director under NASDAQ listing standards and applicable law; and in the case of existing members, the nominee’s contributions as a member of the Board during his or her prior service. In addition, in determining whether to recommend a director nominee, the committee members will consider and discuss diversity, among other factors, with a view toward the needs of the Board as a whole. Generally, the Board considers such factors as race, age, gender, national origin and other factors as part of the consideration with regard to diversity. The Nominating Committee strives to nominate directors with a variety of complementary skills so that the Board, as a whole, will possess the appropriate talent, skills and expertise to oversee our business. The Nominating Committee believes that the inclusion of diversity as one of many factors considered in selecting director nominees is consistent with the committee’s goal of creating a Board that best serves the needs of the company and the interest of its shareholders.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

Our security holders may send written communications to the Board or any one or more of the individual members of the Board by directing such communication to our Corporate Secretary by mail in the care of the Acting Corporate Secretary, John Harvey, at our principal executive offices, or by e-mail to john.harvey@scansource.com. All written communications will be compiled by the Corporate Secretary and promptly submitted to the individual directors being addressed or to the chair of the committee whose areas of responsibility include the specific topic addressed by such communication, or, in all other cases, to the Chairman of the Board.

CODE OF CONDUCT

Our Code of Conduct applies to all of our executive officers, including our CEO and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), directors and employees. We have posted the Code of Conduct on the “Investors” page of our website, www.scansource.com, under the “Governance” tab. We will provide a copy of the Code of Conduct upon request to any person without charge. Such requests may be transmitted by regular mail in the care of the Corporate Secretary.

We will post on our website, www.scansource.com, under the “Governance” tab, or will disclose on a Form 8-K filed with the SEC, any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the Code of Conduct that apply to our CEO and our CFO, or persons performing similar functions, and that relate to (i) honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, (ii) full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the SEC and in other public communications made by us, (iii) compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations, (iv) the prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Conduct to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Conduct, or (v) accountability for adherence to the Code of Conduct. Any waiver granted to an executive officer or a director may only be granted by the Board and will be disclosed, along with the reasons therefor, on a Form 8-K filed with the SEC. No waivers were sought or granted in fiscal 2017.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, Messrs. Fischer, Grainger, Reilly, Whitchurch and Browning served on the Compensation Committee. No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries during fiscal 2017, or at any time prior thereto. During fiscal 2017, no member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, and no executive officers served on the compensation committee (or equivalent) or the board of directors of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				13

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Audit Committee reviews all related party transactions (as defined by Item 404 of Regulation S-K) in accordance with NASDAQ listing standards. In addition, the charter of the Audit Committee requires the Audit Committee to review a summary of any director’s or officer’s related party transactions and potential conflicts of interest on a yearly basis. The charter also requires the Audit Committee to review our conflict of interest policy (which is part of our Code of Conduct) and compliance with that policy on an annual basis.

We are not aware of any related party transaction since the beginning of fiscal 2017 required to be reported under our policy or applicable SEC rules for which our policies and procedures did not require review or for which such policies and procedures were not followed, other than our use of Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP (“Womble”), a national law firm, of which Ms. Temple is a partner. Our use of Womble did not require approval as Ms. Temple was not a director until September 11, 2017. During fiscal 2017, we paid Womble fees of $239,848 for legal services, for which Ms. Temple received no origination fees or other direct benefit. This amount was not material to either Womble or the Company. Prospectively, the Board has determined that we will not engage Womble to provide additional legal services.

There are no family relationships among the executive officers and directors, and there are no arrangements or understandings between any independent director or any other person pursuant to which that independent director was selected as a director.

RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” each of the Nominees previously listed in this Proxy Statement.

14				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL NUMBER 2 - Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

BACKGROUND OF THE PROPOSAL

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our shareholders with the opportunity at the 2017 Annual Meeting to vote on a non-binding advisory resolution, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, approving the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The Company holds this non-binding advisory vote annually. There have been no material changes to our compensation policies this year. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation or the compensation of any specific Named Executive Officer, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. A discussion of these items is found in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Compensation Committee has overseen the development of a compensation program designed to attract, retain and motivate executives who enable us to achieve our strategic and financial goals. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the executive compensation tables regarding Named Executive Officer compensation, together with the accompanying narrative disclosure, illustrate the trends in compensation and application of our compensation philosophies and practices for the years presented. Highlights of our compensation program include the following:

The Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program achieves an appropriate balance between fixed compensation and variable incentive compensation, pays for performance and promotes an alignment between the interests of our Named Executive Officers and our shareholders. Accordingly, we are asking our shareholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting to vote “FOR” the non-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers, including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion below.

EFFECT OF RESOLUTION

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions of our shareholders and will take the outcome of the vote into account when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors believes that our executive compensation program aligns our Named Executive Officers’ compensation with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Our program is guided by the philosophy that total executive compensation should vary based on achievement of goals and objectives, both individual and corporate, and should be focused on long-term strategies to build shareholder value. The Board believes that our philosophy and practices have resulted in executive compensation decisions that are aligned with shareholder interests and that have benefited and will benefit the Company over time.

For the reasons stated above, we recommend a vote “FOR” the following advisory resolution at our 2017 Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Named Executive Officer compensation tables and related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				15

PROPOSAL NUMBER 3 - Frequency Vote on Say on Pay

BACKGROUND OF THE PROPOSAL

Section 14A of the Exchange Act also requires all public companies to hold a separate non-binding advisory shareholder vote with respect to the frequency of the “Say on Pay” vote. Companies must give shareholders the choice of whether to cast an advisory vote on the Say on Pay proposal every year, every two years, or every three years (commonly known as the “Frequency Vote on Say on Pay”). Shareholders may also abstain from making a choice. After such initial vote is held, Section 14A requires all public companies to submit the Frequency Vote on Say on Pay to their shareholders no less often than every six years.

FREQUENCY VOTE ON SAY ON PAY

As discussed above, the Board of Directors believes that our executive compensation programs are designed to secure and retain the services of high quality executives and to provide compensation to our executives that is aligned with our performance. The Board believes that our compensation philosophies and practices advance both the short-term and long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders. The Company currently holds this vote every year. The Board believes that the Frequency Say on Pay Vote should continue to be conducted every year.

The Board believes that an annual vote on named executive officer compensation provides shareholders with the opportunity to provide regular direct input to the Board and its Compensation Committee about the Company’s executive compensation program.

EFFECT OF RESOLUTION

This is an advisory vote and will not be binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may determine that it is in the best interests of our shareholders and the Company to hold a Say on Pay vote more or less frequently than may be indicated by this advisory vote of our shareholders. Nonetheless, the Compensation Committee and the Board will take into account the outcome of this advisory vote when considering how frequently to seek an advisory vote on Say on Pay in future years.

While the Board of Directors recommends that a Say on Pay proposal be voted on every year, you are not voting to approve or disapprove of the Board’s recommendation. Rather, you will be able to specify one of four choices for the Frequency Vote on Say on Pay, as follows: (i) one year, (ii) two years, (iii) three years, or (iv) abstain. The frequency receiving the greatest number of votes cast will be deemed by us as the frequency that has been recommended by our shareholders.

RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors recommends a vote for “One Year” on the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.

16				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL NUMBER 4 -

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors

The Audit Committee has appointed the firm of Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”), an independent registered public accounting firm, as independent auditor to make an examination of our accounts for fiscal 2018, which appointment has been ratified by the Board. See the “Audit Committee Report” below for more information. Shareholder ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton as our independent registered public accounting firm is not required by law but is being presented in the discretion of the Board of Directors. If the shareholders do not ratify this appointment, other independent registered public accounting firms will be considered by the Audit Committee. A representative of Grant Thornton is expected to be in attendance at the 2017 Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement and be available to respond to appropriate questions.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

As reflected in the table below, we incurred fees in fiscal 2017 and 2016 for services performed by Grant Thornton related to such periods.

In the above table, in accordance with applicable SEC rules:

AUDIT COMMITTEE’S PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

It is the policy of the Audit Committee to pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services proposed to be performed by our independent auditor. All audit and permitted non-audit services performed in fiscal 2017 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The process for such pre-approval is typically as follows: Audit Committee pre-approval is sought at one of the Audit Committee’s regularly scheduled meetings following the presentation of information at such meeting detailing the particular services proposed to be performed. The authority to pre-approve non-audit services may be delegated by the Audit Committee, pursuant to guidelines approved by the Audit Committee, to one or more members of the Audit Committee. None of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the exception provided by the Exchange Act rules.

The Audit Committee has reviewed the non-audit services provided by Grant Thornton and has determined that the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining Grant Thornton’s independence for the period of time during which it has served as our independent auditor.

RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				17

Executive Compensation

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following sets forth certain information regarding our current executive officers who, together with our former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Charles A. Mathis, and our former Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, John J. Ellsworth, are our Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017:

18				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The purpose of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis is to provide information about our compensation objectives and practices for our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2017. The Compensation Committee monitors the results of the “Say-on-Pay” vote and considers those results along with the objectives listed above in determining compensation policies. A substantial majority (over 95%) of our shareholders voting at the meeting approved the compensation paid in fiscal 2016 as described in our 2016 proxy statement. The Compensation Committee interpreted this vote result as a strong indication of support for our current compensation program. In light of this support, and its own independent review of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee did not implement any significant changes to the executive compensation program design disclosed in our 2016 proxy statement.

Executive Summary

OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate executives through achieving the following three objectives:

Pay-for-Performance

The guiding principle of our compensation philosophy is that pay should be linked to performance and that the interests of executives and shareholders should be aligned. Our compensation program is designed to provide significant performance-based compensation, including equity compensation that is variable and based on our actual results and our executives’ performance, as compared to fixed or guaranteed compensation. As a result, a significant portion of our Named Executive Officers’ compensation is directly contingent on our operating results (non-GAAP operating income and return on invested capital (“ROIC”)) and aligned with shareholder interests.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				19

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Align Interests of Named Executive Officers and Shareholders

In addition to our pay-for-performance program, the Compensation Committee has adopted a number of other compensation policies or best practices designed to align the interests of our Named Executive Officers and our shareholders. These include:

ScanSource Does
		Tie a high percentage of the pay of our CEO and other Named Executive Officers to corporate and individual performance goals. For example, for fiscal 2017 approximately 58% of the total compensation opportunity for our CEO was variable performance-based compensation.
		Require significant stock ownership. We have adopted minimum ownership guidelines for our CEO. He is required to retain 50% of the net shares resulting from vesting or exercises of equity awards until he owns Company common stock in an amount equal to three times his base salary. As of June 30, 2017, Mr. Baur was in compliance with the Company’s stock ownership guidelines.
		Mandate a claw-back policy tied to a compensation program. We maintain a “claw-back policy,” which would allow us to recover certain incentive compensation based on financial results in the event those results were restated due at least partially to the recipient’s misconduct. In addition, this policy requires the recoupment of any compensation to the extent mandated by applicable laws.
		Seek our shareholders’ input on executive compensation. We value our shareholders’ input on our executive compensation, and we seek an annual non-binding vote on our executive compensation policies.

Retain Talented Leadership

We operate in a marketplace characterized by significant competition for talented executives. Our executive compensation program is designed to enable us to attract, motivate, reward and retain the management talent necessary to achieve both long-term and short-term corporate objectives and enhance shareholder value. We also aim to establish executive compensation levels that correlate directly to the Named Executive Officer’s level of responsibility, with the compensation of our Named Executive Officers being tied both to our performance as a whole and to individual performance. To do this effectively, our philosophy is that our compensation program must provide our Named Executive Officers with a total compensation package that is reasonable in relation to our performance, and sufficiently competitive with the packages offered by similarly sized companies within or outside our industry.

20				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Material Elements of Our Compensation Programs

The Compensation Committee strives to provide our Named Executive Officers with a compensation package that balances short-term and long-term compensation. We believe that our current executive compensation program, consisting of a mix of base salary, retirement contributions, annual performance-based cash incentive awards and both performance-based and annual service-based grants of equity, (i) provides a predictable and transparent structure for executive compensation, (ii) provides a significant percentage of a Named Executive Officer’s compensation through variable performance-based vehicles, and (iii) attracts, retains and motivates our Named Executive Officers.

In determining the compensation of our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee uses the following specific compensation elements, which it believes support our compensation objectives.

The Compensation Committee determines the amounts of each element and the aggregate compensation for our Named Executive Officers, without using any specific formula or attempting to satisfy any specific ratio for compensation among our Named Executive Officers; however, the differences in the aggregate compensation between our CEO and our other Named Executive Officers are intended to reflect the individual responsibilities with respect to their respective positions, experience in the applicable role and experience in our industry.

In determining compensation for our CEO, the Compensation Committee considers the amount of compensation he receives in cash versus equity. A large portion of our CEO’s compensation is in the form of stock options, which are valued at the time of grant using the Black-Scholes model, despite that this form of compensation may never result in value for our CEO. As a result, there can be a significant difference between what is reported as our CEO’s total compensation for a given year and what he actually receives.

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews benchmarking and market surveys in order to ensure that our compensation is competitive with that of our peers. The Compensation Committee also considers analysis and benchmarking by third parties, such as ISS and Equilar and the different peer groups each firm uses for comparative purposes in order to gain a better understanding of compensation practices and trends in the market.

The Compensation Committee views the components of compensation as related, but distinct, and therefore regularly reevaluates the appropriate mix of elements, including the appropriate targets for incentive awards. The Compensation Committee also relies on the independent expertise compiled from the general knowledge, experience and good

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				21

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

judgment of its members, both with regard to competitive compensation levels and the relative success that our Company has achieved. From time to time, the Compensation Committee may also retain a compensation consultant and relies on information provided by the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultants. During fiscal 2014, our Compensation Committee used a compensation consultant, as discussed in our 2015 proxy statement, to design and evaluate all of the elements of our executive compensation for our Named Executive Officers’ three-year employment agreements. In connection with the expiration of our Named Executive Officers’ three-year employment agreements this year, we again utilized the services of a compensation consultant during fiscal 2017 to help determine appropriate executive compensation levels and design. As a result of this review, we adopted a revised structure whereby we have entered into a new three-year employment agreement, effective July 1, 2017, with our CEO and other Named Executive Officers receive employment letters and participate in a severance plan which collectively detail their compensation structure and benefits.

Base Salary

Base salary generally provides a fixed base level of compensation for our executives for the services they render during the year. The purpose of base salary is to compensate our Named Executive Officers in light of their respective roles and responsibilities over time. Base salary is essential to allow us to compete in the employment marketplace for talent and is an important component of total compensation for the Named Executive Officers. It is vital to our goal of recruiting and retaining Named Executive Officers with proven abilities. A Named Executive Officer’s base salary is set in accordance with the terms of his or her employment agreement or letter and is reviewed annually. Increases, if any, to base salary are based generally upon a subjective assessment of overall individual performance, market trends and the Company’s performance. In evaluating the Company’s performance, the primary consideration is our financial performance for the relevant annual period, with a focus on ROIC and non-GAAP operating income, each of which aligns executive and shareholder interests and which we consider to have a strong correlation with shareholder value creation. In fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee approved a 3% base salary increase for the CEO to be effective in fiscal 2018. The Compensation Committee had not provided a base salary increase for the CEO the previous two fiscal years. No other Named Executive Officer had a base salary increase in fiscal 2017.

Annual Variable Performance-Based Cash Incentive Awards

Annual variable performance-based cash incentive awards are designed to encourage the achievement of various pre-determined Company financial and operating performance goals. For fiscal 2017, non-GAAP operating income and ROIC are the primary measurements of performance for cash incentive awards because of our belief that each such measurement has a strong correlation with shareholder value. ROIC assists us in comparing our performance over various reporting periods on a consistent basis because it removes from our operating results the impact of items that do not reflect our core operating performance. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to make adjustments to non-GAAP operating income and ROIC for extraordinary one-time events, or other items beyond management’s control, and to award additional cash incentives based on other criteria.

Our management emphasizes non-GAAP operating income and ROIC, both non-GAAP measures, in evaluating and monitoring the Company’s financial condition and operating performance. For calculations of non-GAAP measures, reconciliations to GAAP measures, and reasons for using these measures, see “Non-GAAP Financial Information” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.

Annual Performance-Based and Service-Based Equity Awards

The Compensation Committee annually grants equity (restricted stock, restricted stock units or stock options) to our Named Executive Officers, since it believes this element of our compensation program provides our Named Executive Officers with the opportunity to develop a significant ownership stake in the Company and directly aligns their interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders. In addition, equity awards serve as a retention vehicle for the Named Executive Officers because, if performance criteria is met, they typically vest over three years and generally are forfeited if not vested upon termination of employment. The Committee has focused on the use of stock options for our CEO to strengthen both pay-for-performance and shareholder alignment.

In approving long-term equity incentives, the Compensation Committee focuses on the Company’s overall performance, the value of the proposed award, the amount and value of awards granted in prior years, and the overall compensation package of the Named Executive Officer with the ultimate goal of aligning the interests of the executives with our

22				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

shareholders’ interests and motivating and retaining critical leadership through the use of equity. The Compensation Committee also believes that linking the personal financial interests of our Named Executive Officers to the Company’s long-term performance discourages excessive risk taking and supports sustainable shareholder value creation.

In addition to the performance-based equity awards, the Company has historically granted service-based annual equity awards at the December meeting of the Compensation Committee. Equity awards are made by the Compensation Committee from time to time to incentivize and reward certain performance and to provide additional retention value. See the “Long-Term Equity Incentives” section of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis for more information.

The Compensation Committee’s policy is to set the exercise price of stock option awards by using the closing price of our stock on the date of the grant. The Compensation Committee determines the number of shares of a value-based restricted stock unit award by using an average of the closing price of the Company’s stock for a 45-day period prior to the date of grant. Annual equity awards are approved at an in-person meeting of the Compensation Committee on the day of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders provided that the Company is in an open trading window, and otherwise at the next Compensation Committee meeting.

Process for Determining Named Executive Officer Compensation in Fiscal 2017

ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing, approving, and monitoring compensation policies and programs that are consistent with the Company’s business strategy and aligned with shareholders’ interests. Specifically, the Compensation Committee is responsible for:

The Compensation Committee meets several times each year to review and approve executive compensation programs and, if necessary, recommend approval to the Board of Directors.

ROLE OF MANAGEMENT

The Compensation Committee regularly meets with the CEO to receive reports and recommendations regarding the compensation of our Named Executive Officers other than the CEO. In particular, the CEO recommends to the Compensation Committee annual base salaries, annual incentive awards and long-term or performance equity grants for the Named Executive Officers other than himself. The Compensation Committee then evaluates each Named Executive Officer, sets performance criteria for annual cash incentive awards, and makes long-term equity grants, if any. At the beginning of each fiscal year, Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”) targets for certain financial measures, such as non-GAAP operating income and ROIC, are established with consideration for adjustments for one-time expenses or longer term investments that are planned. As part of its evaluation process, the Compensation Committee considers the Company’s performance and consistency, the Named Executive Officer’s individual performance over the prior year, changes in responsibilities, and future potential as well as data available from compensation surveys and compensation consultants. Although the Compensation Committee considers the CEO’s recommendations, the final decisions regarding base salary, annual incentive awards and equity awards are made by the Compensation Committee.

ROLE OF COMPENSATION CONSULTANT

From time to time, the Compensation Committee has utilized an independent expert compensation professional. During fiscal 2014, a compensation consultant worked with the Compensation Committee in connection with evaluating Named Executive Officer compensation packages in preparation of new three-year employment agreements for each Named Executive Officer that became effective on July 1, 2014. No compensation consultant was used by the Company during fiscal 2015 or 2016 in the analysis of any executive’s compensation.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				23

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

As a result of the expiration of our Named Executive Officers’ three-year employment agreements this year, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Willis Towers Watson during fiscal 2017 to help determine appropriate executive compensation levels and design. In connection with such engagement, Willis Towers Watson provided the Compensation Committee with general market surveys and other information related to the general market for executive compensation. In addition, Willis Towers Watson provided information derived from proxy statements from peer companies that included publicly traded technology distributors and other technology industry companies with similar revenues. The peer companies included the following:

See “Determining Named Executive Officer Compensation in Fiscal 2018” on page 31 for additional information.

The Compensation Committee reviewed all factors relevant to the independence of Willis Towers Watson, including:

As a result of such evaluation, and a certification from Willis Towers Watson regarding its consultant’s independence, the Compensation Committee determined that Willis Towers Watson is independent.

Determining Named Executive Officer Compensation in Fiscal 2017

SUMMARY

Our executive compensation program emphasizes performance-based pay. The elements of compensation and the general mix of compensation amongst the various elements remained unchanged in fiscal 2017. The Company’s financial performance during fiscal 2017 is reflected in the compensation of each of our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2017, particularly with respect to payouts pursuant to our annual cash incentive program. Our cash incentive opportunity is designed such that if our financial results, as measured by non-GAAP operating income and ROIC, reflect an increase in the financial performance of the Company, then our executives should realize a greater impact on their cash incentive opportunity. Under the cash incentive opportunity for our Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2017, awards were based on non-GAAP operating income targets but could have been adjusted upward or downward based on ROIC for the year. In addition, individual performance is also taken into account by the Compensation Committee, and an additional amount may be paid if an executive exceeds expectations. The award also may be reduced or eliminated completely by the Compensation Committee if an executive does not meet performance expectations of the Compensation Committee. Awards are also capped at 200% of the executive’s target bonus regardless of our financial performance.

For fiscal 2017, based on (i) our financial performance, (ii) the Compensation Committee’s pre-established MIP operating targets for the cash incentive opportunity, and (iii) his performance, the cash incentives paid to our CEO were $205,530 less than the amount he received for fiscal 2016 (a 23% reduction year over year) and $625,452 less than the amount he received for fiscal 2015. We believe this result is appropriately aligned with the Company’s fiscal 2017 financial performance.

The equity awarded to our CEO was $462,464 more than the amount he received for fiscal 2016 (a 39% increase year over year) and $71,320 less than the amount he received for fiscal 2015. The higher equity award is consistent with our goal of aligning our CEO’s pecuniary interests with long-term shareholder value creation.

24				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In addition, the total compensation of our CEO generally has increased or decreased during the past five fiscal years as adjusted ROIC and non-GAAP operating income have increased or decreased. We believe this correlation between the Company’s performance and pay appropriately motivates and rewards our CEO and is beneficial to our shareholders.

In addition, we believe that it is important to link each of our Named Executive Officers’ compensation and personal financial interests with long-term shareholder value creation. Accordingly, 40% of our CEO’s total compensation for fiscal 2017, and 25% of Mr. Lyons’ total compensation was in the form of long-term equity incentives. Our CEO has been awarded restricted stock units and stock options to directly link the CEO’s interest to that of shareholders. For fiscal 2017, variable performance-based compensation in the form of cash and long-term equity incentives constituted $2,349,947, or 58% of our CEO’s total compensation.

Greater detail regarding the compensation of our Named Executive Officers can be found within the 2017 Summary Compensation Table located within this Proxy Statement.

Employment Agreements, Employment Letters and Severance Plan

We have determined that our Company’s and our shareholders’ interests are best served by entering into either (i) employment agreements that have initial terms of three-years or (ii) employment letters with an accompanying severance plan with our Named Executive Officers. Such agreements, letters and plans are the result of arms’ length negotiations between the Compensation Committee, the Company, the CEO and other Named Executive Officers, and all are approved by the Compensation Committee. We believe that these employment arrangements benefit us and our shareholders by permitting us to attract and retain Named Executive Officers with demonstrated leadership abilities and to secure their services over an extended period of time. In addition, the employment arrangements align executive interests with the long-term interests of the Company and serve our recruitment and retention goals by providing executive officers with security based on the knowledge of how they will be compensated over the course of their employment, while at the same time providing the Company with significant protections regarding non-competition, non-solicitation of business and employees, and confidential business information.

Each of our Named Executive Officers was a party to an employment agreement during fiscal 2017, which set forth the executive’s base salary, annual cash incentive opportunity, and equity award opportunity. At the end of fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee approved an amendment to Mr. Lyons’ employment agreement effective June 15, 2017 that extended his employment agreement by one year and modified the restrictive covenant provisions of Mr. Lyons’ employment agreement to clarify that certain rights of Mr. Lyons regarding disclosure of confidential information and/or trade secrets are protected under certain circumstances. At that time, the Compensation Committee also approved a new three-year employment agreement effective July 1, 2017 for Mr. Baur. In connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer in August 2017, we entered into a new employment letter with Mr. Lyons which replaced his previously amended employment agreement. See the “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Certain Events” section of this Proxy Statement for more information on Mr. Baur and Mr. Lyons’ employment agreements that were in effect during fiscal 2017. See the “Determining Named Executive Officer Compensation in Fiscal 2018” section of this Proxy Statement for more information about Mr. Baur’s new employment agreement in effect for fiscal 2018 and Mr. Lyons’ new employment letter which became effective August 23, 2017.

Mr. Ellsworth and Mr. Mathis were also previously party to employment agreements with the Company which terminated upon their resignations during fiscal 2017. Upon his resignation, Mr. Ellsworth and the Company also entered into a Severance Agreement which provided for the severance benefits owed to him under his employment agreement. See the “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Certain Events” section of this Proxy Statement for more information on what Mr. Ellsworth and Mr. Mathis received upon their resignations.

Base Salary

The initial base salary for each Named Executive Officer is established in the Named Executive Officer’s employment agreement or employment letter. Base salary initially was determined for each Named Executive Officer based on the abilities, qualifications, accomplishments and prior work experience of the Named Executive Officer, as well as the market compensation comparable for the position.

All Named Executive Officer employment agreements require an annual review of base salary by the Compensation Committee, and annual upward adjustments may be made by the Compensation Committee on a discretionary basis. In

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				25

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

deciding whether to increase a Named Executive Officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considers company performance, the consistency of the Named Executive Officer’s individual performance over the prior year, changes in the Named Executive Officer’s responsibilities and the Named Executive Officer’s future potential. In evaluating Company performance, the primary focus is upon financial performance for the relevant annual period, measured generally by non-GAAP operating income and ROIC. The Compensation Committee also considers data available from benchmarking studies obtained from a range of industry and general market sources, as well as information that may be provided by its compensation consultants, including comparisons of peer companies comprised of other participants in the industry and other similar companies based on size and other objective factors.

The Compensation Committee met in September of 2016 to determine the Named Executive Officers’ base salaries for fiscal 2017. The Compensation Committee did not award any base salary increase to any Named Executive Officer. Base salaries for the Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2017 as effective on July 1, 2016 were as follows:

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives

The principal objective of our performance-based cash incentives is to motivate and reward our Named Executive Officers for performance in achieving our business objectives based upon annual attainment of both non-GAAP operating income and ROIC targets. The Compensation Committee created a new cash incentive design for the Named Executive Officers beginning in fiscal 2013, which we refer to as the Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”). Annual performance-based cash incentives were set based on an analysis of market data and assessing the experience of the respective individual and their respective role. The design provides that each Named Executive Officer’s cash incentive opportunity will be expressed as a percentage of his or her base salary and earned based on non-GAAP operating income results as compared to pre-established threshold and stretch goals. Each Named Executive Officer has a variable factor by role or position applied as a percentage against their respective base salary. In addition, the cash incentive may be modified by ROIC results. For each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee sets a MIP target of non-GAAP operating income (“MIP Non-GAAP OI Target”) and ROIC target (“MIP ROIC Target”), to provide for appropriate annual incentives to management. The Compensation Committee establishes MIP targets at the beginning of the fiscal year with certain adjustments to align management’s performance on focused strategic objectives. Individual performance results are also factored into the cash incentive opportunity. For example, if an executive performs significantly below expectations, he or she will not earn a bonus regardless of our financial performance. If the Company meets both the MIP Non-GAAP OI Target and MIP ROIC Target and the executive exceeds expectations, he or she may be entitled to an additional cash bonus up to 20% of the bonus earned based on non-GAAP operating income as modified by ROIC. The maximum incentive award for any Named Executive Officer is 200% of their target bonus. For fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee established a MIP Non-GAAP OI Target of $126.6 million and a MIP ROIC Target of 15%.

Under the cash incentive program, for the Named Executive Officers for fiscal 2017, awards may be modified by ROIC results as follows:

26				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Non-GAAP operating income results between standards result in bonus calculation by straight-line interpolation. The Compensation Committee used the table above to set the Named Executive Officers’ cash incentive awards for fiscal 2017. Based on the actual results, the cash incentive award was set at 54.93% of the executive’s bonus target.

Additionally, the cash incentive award may be modified as set forth below based on the results of MIP ROIC. The table below does not include a potential individual modifier:

The Compensation Committee also had the discretion to modify or eliminate an individual executive’s cash incentive award based on the executive’s job performance as follows:

For fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee elected not to make any discretionary modifications to the awards payable under the MIP. Therefore, as a result of the Company’s MIP non-GAAP operating income and MIP ROIC for fiscal 2017 in relation to the targets described above, the cash incentive award earned by all Named Executive Officers under the MIP in fiscal 2017 was 54.93% of all target bonuses, as compared to 71% in fiscal 2016 and 103.99% in fiscal 2015.

Messrs. Ellsworth and Mathis did not receive any awards under the MIP for fiscal 2017 as a result of their resignations prior to the end of the fiscal year.

The specific calculations, target and cash awards for each Named Executive Officer under the MIP for fiscal 2017 are detailed below.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				27

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In recognition of his service as interim Chief Financial Officer and his important contributions to our acquisition activities that resulted in the purchase of POS Portal, in August 2017 the Compensation Committee also determined to award Mr. Lyons a cash incentive payment of $100,000.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

GENERAL OVERVIEW

Equity awards are a significant component of our Named Executive Officer compensation. We grant equity awards, currently in the form of stock options, restricted stock awards and/or restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units or awards, to promote the success and enhance the value of the Company by providing participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. Equity awards are granted under our 2013 Plan, which is designed to align the interests of participants, including our Named Executive Officers, with those of the shareholders by linking a portion of their compensation directly to increases in shareholder value. Equity-based awards also provide the Company with the flexibility to motivate, attract and retain the services of employees upon whose judgment, interest and special effort the successful conduct of our operation is largely dependent. We believe that equity awards provide long-term incentives to our Named Executive Officers because they tie the Named Executive Officers’ financial interests to those of our shareholders.

We maintain a formal Equity Award Grant Policy, whereby equity awards to employees are made by, or with the oversight of, the Compensation Committee or the Board. Under the policy, the Board and the Compensation Committee have delegated limited authority to our CEO to make awards to newly-hired or newly-promoted employees and for performance recognition awards to employees, in each case who are not officers or directors under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act or “covered employees” under Code Section 162(m), subject to individual grant limits of either (but not both) options or stock appreciation rights (or similar awards) for up to 15,000 shares, or restricted awards or restricted stock units (or similar awards) for up to 5,000 shares. In addition, the CEO has authority to grant quarterly equity performance awards to employees. Any individual grant of a quarterly performance equity award pursuant to this delegation of authority to the CEO is limited to a maximum fair market value of $25,000 to any one employee, subject to an aggregate maximum fair market value of $100,000 to all employees receiving such awards in any quarter. The Compensation Committee must approve other equity awards to employees, including grants to officers under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and to “covered employees” under Code Section 162(m), and either the Board or the Compensation Committee must approve equity grants in connection with a merger, acquisition or similar transaction. Under the policy, our Worldwide Vice President of Human Resources and Chief Financial Officer oversee the documentation of, and accounting for, equity award grants.

The Compensation Committee historically has granted annual service-based equity awards to employees based on merit, which vest over a three-year period in the majority of instances, provided that the grantee remains employed with the Company through each vesting date. The grant date for annual equity awards is typically the date following the annual shareholders meeting, provided that such grants must be made during an open “window” for stock transactions (under our insider trading compliance program). In the event that the scheduled annual grant date following the annual shareholders meeting does not occur during an open window with respect to the participant, the annual grant for such participant will occur at the next Compensation Committee meeting that occurs during an open window. The annual grant date for the Named Executive Officers is the same as for other employees, provided that the window is open with respect to the grantee.

In addition to the annual service-based equity awards discussed above, the Compensation Committee, from time to time, also grants to certain of our Named Executive Officers additional performance-based restricted stock awards and/or restricted stock units that contain both performance and service vesting conditions over a multi-year period. These combined performance- and service-based awards are discussed in greater detail below.

The Compensation Committee also may make special grants of equity awards during the year in the case of the hiring or promotion of persons who are Section 16 officers or Code Section 162(m) “covered employees” or other eligible persons, or in other situations not involving annual grants. The grant date for non-annual grants approved by the Compensation Committee is the date of the Compensation Committee meeting at which such grants are approved, provided that the meeting occurs during an open window, except in the case of newly hired or newly promoted officers or employees, in which case the grant date is the fifth trading day of the next month (or, if the window is closed on that date, the first succeeding trading day when the window is open). New hire or promotion grants made by the CEO also

28				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

occur on the fifth trading day of the month following hire and CEO approval of the grant, provided that the window is open on such date (or, if the window is not open on such date, on the first succeeding trading day when the window is open). In any event, all equity awards must be made during an open window with respect to such person.

The number of shares subject to service-based stock options, restricted stock awards or restricted stock units granted by the Compensation Committee to our executives in a given year is based on, among other things, overall Company performance, the number of shares available for awards under the 2013 Plan or successor plan, the value of the proposed award, the amount of options and/or shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units awarded in prior years, total compensation and consideration of the competitive market practice for the respective position level and experience, with the ultimate objective of motivating, rewarding and retaining Named Executive Officers while maintaining efficient use of equity and preserving shareholder value.

The exercise price of all stock options granted by the Compensation Committee, including grants by our CEO pursuant to delegated authority, cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value (as determined under the applicable stock plan) of the common stock on the date of the grant. Stock options generally are subject to a three-year vesting schedule and a ten-year term. Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units that are not performance-based generally are subject to a three-year vesting schedule. In addition, vesting of such awards accelerates on a change of control followed by termination in certain instances or upon death, disability or termination due to retirement. In certain circumstances, the option term may be reduced due to termination of employment, death or disability of a participant.

The Compensation Committee will continue to consider the use of stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units for future grants to our Named Executive Officers.

SERVICE-BASED EQUITY AWARDS

Long-term equity incentives were awarded to our Named Executive Officers during fiscal 2017, as provided below. Each of the following equity awards generally vests and, if applicable, becomes exercisable in one-third increments on the anniversary of the grant date over three years, subject to the continued employment of the Named Executive Officer on the applicable vesting date. Mr. Mathis resigned from the Company prior to the annual equity grant for fiscal 2017. Because Mr. Ellsworth resigned prior to June 30, 2017, his restricted stock units for fiscal 2017 were cancelled and did not vest.

The Compensation Committee has continued its historical practice of granting Mr. Baur’s annual service-based award in the form of stock options. In addition, in fiscal 2017, Mr. Baur was also granted restricted stock units. The Compensation Committee considered a number of factors in making this allocation change:

The Compensation Committee believes that a significant portion of the CEO’s equity award should be directly aligned with shareholder return, given the nature of this position and the role of equity in the total compensation for the CEO compared to the role of equity for the other Named Executive Officers.

PERFORMANCE- AND SERVICE-BASED EQUITY AWARDS

To further strengthen the performance objectives of our long-term equity incentives, the Compensation Committee considers including performance- and service-based restricted stock awards and restricted stock units as a part of long-term incentives for Named Executive Officers.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				29

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In connection with their employment agreements, in 2014 the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Lyons, Mr. Ellsworth and Mr. Mathis three-year performance and service-based restricted stock units. The award for each grantee is split into three one-year performance periods, matching up with the Company’s fiscal year. Vesting of the awards for each executive is subject to attainment of non-GAAP operating income goals, continued service and other terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee (including discretion of the Compensation Committee as to the extent, if any, to which the award is earned). The Compensation Committee established non-GAAP operating income as the performance metric for these awards, with target levels set in line with the MIP Non-GAAP OI Target. Mr. Mathis’ grant was valued at $300,000 ($100,000 per year). Mr. Ellsworth’s grant was valued at $150,000 ($50,000 per year). Mr. Lyons’ grant was valued at $75,000 ($25,000 per year). No stock units vested, if at all, until June 30, 2017 and, in addition to the requirement that the performance goals be met, the grantee must have been employed by the Company from the grant date until that date in order to receive the shares underlying the awards. Because Mr. Mathis and Mr. Ellsworth resigned prior to June 30, 2017, their stock units did not vest.

Based on our non-GAAP operating income results in 2017, Mr. Lyons earned 452 stock units for fiscal 2017. Over the three-year performance periods, Mr. Lyons earned a total of 1,700 stock units with a value of $65,450, all of which vested on June 30, 2017.

Perquisites

The Company only provides limited perquisites to our Named Executive Officers, including the availability of a voluntary comprehensive physical examination once every fiscal year. The physical examination helps ensure our Named Executive Officers’ continued health and ability to render services to the Company through an annual physical program. The physicals are provided to encourage senior leaders of the Company to set the example for living positively and active healthy living. The Company does not provide any other perquisites to its Named Executive Officers.

Health and Insurance Plans

Our Named Executive Officers are entitled to participate in our health, vision, dental, paid time off, life, disability and employee stock purchase plans to the same degree that our other employees are entitled to participate. In addition, our Named Executive Officers participate in a supplemental long-term disability plan and each receives term life insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 (subject to underwriting) and $500,000 (subject to limited underwriting).

Deferred Compensation Plan

We maintain a deferred compensation plan pursuant to which Named Executive Officers may defer a portion of their annual compensation. These deferrals are matched to the extent specified in each Named Executive Officer’s employment agreement or letter, and such contributions vest over a five-year period. Participants invest their deferrals and Company matching contributions among various funds designated by the plan administrator (and currently may not be invested in our common stock). Participants become fully vested in any employer contributions as long as they are continuously employed until their death, total disability, the date in which the sum of age and years of service equals or exceeds 65 or the occurrence of a change of control. We maintain the deferred compensation plan to provide a competitive benefit and to facilitate adequate savings for retirement on a tax efficient basis for our Named Executive Officers.

Retirement Benefits

The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Plan, which is a Company-wide, tax-qualified retirement plan. The intent of this plan is to provide all employees with a tax-advantaged savings opportunity for retirement. We sponsor this plan to help employees at all levels save and accumulate assets for use during their retirement. Eligible pay under this plan is capped at Internal Revenue Code annual limits. The Company provides a match up to a total of $800 per year per employee plus an annual discretionary profit-sharing contribution. These Company contributions vest over a five-year period.

For fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee authorized discretionary profit sharing contributions to the 401(k) plan for all of our employees, including our Named Executive Officers. The amount allocated is calculated as a percentage of eligible cash compensation up to $270,000. The amount allocated to each Named Executive Officer for the fiscal 2017 was the same percentage as for all of our employees, but the amount allocated was capped at $12,771. See the “Summary Compensation Table — All Other Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement for the amounts received by our Named Executive Officers.

30				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Eligible employees may participate in our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which is a Company-wide employee stock purchase plan. The intent of the ESPP is to assist our employees in acquiring a stock ownership interest in the Company.

Determining Named Executive Officer Compensation in Fiscal 2018

OVERVIEW

In May 2017, the Compensation Committee worked with Willis Towers Watson to provide updated market compensation references and information for the Named Executive Officers in connection with the expiration of our Named Executive Officers’ three-year employment agreements this year. Willis Towers Watson provided the Compensation Committee with general market surveys and other information related to the general market for executive compensation. In addition, Willis Towers Watson provided information derived from proxy statements from peer companies that included publicly traded technology distributors and other technology industry companies with similar revenues. The peer companies included the following:

The Compensation Committee reviewed compensation information from this peer group by comparable executive position and level to better understand the market for other participants in the market for all aspects of compensation. In a review of the applicable data, the Compensation Committee sought to ensure that the overall compensation to our Named Executive Officers was competitive and within norms for the industry and other companies of similar characteristics based on the executive’s position, level and job performance.

The Compensation Committee took this evaluation into account in determining the terms of Mr. Baur’s new three-year employment agreement, effective July 1, 2017, and Mr. Lyons’ employment letter, effective August 23, 2017. In addition, the Compensation Committee has determined that going forward, the Chief Executive Officer will be the only executive with an employment agreement, and the other Named Executive Officers will be employed at-will and will participate in the ScanSource, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, which provides certain severance and other benefits in the event of certain terminations, as described in further detail below.

BASE SALARIES

The Compensation Committee met in August of 2017 to determine the Named Executive Officers’ base salaries for fiscal 2018. In addition to the increase of $25,000 to Mr. Baur, which the Compensation Committee made in connection with the amendment of Mr. Baur’s employment agreement and deemed was appropriate in light of his prior accomplishments and experience and market trends, the Compensation Committee also approved a $75,000 increase for Mr. Lyons in connection with his appointment as our Chief Financial Officer and his new employment letter.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND EMPLOYMENT LETTERS

As previously mentioned, on June 15, 2017, we entered into a new three-year employment agreement, effective July 1, 2017 with Mr. Baur. Mr. Baur’s amended employment agreement provides for:

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				31

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In addition, we will make additional payments to Mr. Baur’s deferred compensation account to cover the cost of future premiums for “access only” continuation coverage under our medical and dental plan following termination of employment until Mr. Baur attains age 65, and to cover the cost of coverage for years after age 65 assuming Mr. Baur is enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B and D, obtains a Medicare supplemental policy until age 80 and pays the full cost for such coverage.

Under Mr. Baur’s amended employment agreement, variable cash incentive opportunities will continue to be based upon the performance and attainment of performance goals to be established annually by the Compensation Committee, subject to maximum amounts that may be earned. Mr. Baur’s annual equity award opportunity is subject to the Compensation Committee’s discretion and the terms of the 2013 Plan and related equity award agreements.

Mr. Baur’s amended employment agreement also provides for severance payments to Mr. Baur upon certain events, as further described in the “Severance Plan” section below.

On August 23, 2017, we entered into a new employment letter with Mr. Lyons in connection with his appointment as our Chief Financial Officer, effective that date. This employment letter replaces and terminates Mr. Lyons’ previous employment agreement with the Company, as amended. Under the new employment letter, Mr. Lyons will be paid an annual base salary of $350,000 and have an annual cash bonus target equal to 70% of his base salary (with a maximum of 200% of the target). He also will receive other benefits, including change-in-control payments as a participant in the Severance Plan described below, and is eligible for participation in the Company’s other long-term incentive award programs and our Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.

SEVERANCE PLAN

On June 15, 2017, we approved the ScanSource, Inc. Executive Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”), which became effective July 1, 2017. The Severance Plan was established to provide severance and other benefits to certain executives selected by the Compensation Committee to participate in the Severance Plan.

Mr. Baur’s employment agreement and the Severance Plan also provide that if the employment of Mr. Baur or any executive selected by the Committee to participate in the Severance Plan, respectively, is terminated by the Company without cause, or if the Executive resigns for good reason, we will be required to pay or provide the executive’s base salary earned through the date of termination. In addition, we will also be required to pay to the executive in such instances any other amounts or benefits the executive is eligible to receive under any Company plan, program, policy, practice, contract or agreement in accordance with their terms. In such instances, we will also be required to provide severance benefits to the executive, subject to the executive’s execution of a release in a form provided in the employment agreement, the employment letter, and/or the Severance Plan, as applicable, consisting of compensation equal to the average annual base salary and variable compensation earned by the executive, including any amounts earned but deferred, in the last three fiscal years prior to the termination (the “Average Compensation Amount”), multiplied by a severance multiple, less withholdings. In the case of Mr. Baur, the severance multiple is equal to 2.5, in the case of Mr. Lyons, the severance multiple is 1.5, and in the case of any other executive participating in the Severance Plan, the severance multiple will be set forth in a participation agreement between the Company and such executive (a “Participation Agreement”), but such multiple may not exceed 2.5. In the event the termination occurs within 12 months after or prior to and in contemplation of certain change in control events, Mr. Baur will receive three times his Average Compensation Amount, Mr. Lyons will receive two times his Average Compensation Amount and, in the case of any other executive participating in the Severance Plan, such executive will receive his Average Compensation Amount multiplied by his change in control multiple, as set forth in a Participation Agreement, but such multiple may not exceed 2.5. In addition, in the event that the executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause, or if the executive resigns for good reason, the executive will be entitled to receive a bonus equal to the pro-rata portion of the then current fiscal year annual variable compensation that would otherwise be payable to the executive based on actual performance. For a period of up to twenty-four months following the date of such a termination (or in the case of Mr. Baur, until he attains 65 years of age), the executives shall be entitled to participate in our medical and dental plans, with the executive paying the full premium charged for such coverage subject to the terms of the employment agreement, the employment letter, and/or the Severance Plan, as applicable.

If the executive’s employment is terminated for cause or if the executive voluntarily terminates his employment during the term of the agreement, other than for good reason, we will only be obligated to provide any accrued amounts

32				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

payable on the executive’s annual base salary or any other amounts not previously paid, but earned, by the executive as of the date of termination, and benefits under other plans in accordance with their terms. If the executive dies, becomes disabled, or retires during the term of the employment agreement, the employment letter, and/or the Severance Plan, as applicable, we will only be obligated to provide any accrued amounts payable on the executive’s annual base salary or any other amounts not previously paid, but earned, by the executive as of the date of termination, a bonus equal to the pro-rata portion of the then current fiscal year annual variable compensation that would otherwise be payable to the executive based on actual performance, and benefits under other plans in accordance with their terms.

If we do not renew the employment agreement, or enter into a new employment agreement with the same or similar terms after the end of the employment period, and Mr. Baur remains an employee of the Company in any capacity, Mr. Baur’s employment will be on an at-will basis, and Mr. Baur generally will be eligible to receive the same severance benefits set forth in the employment agreement.

In addition, each of the employment agreement, the employment letter, and/or the Severance Plan, as applicable, requires the executive not to, during the term of his employment and for a period of two years following the termination of such executive’s employment: (a) compete with the Company; (b) solicit certain customers or suppliers and certain prospective customers or suppliers of the Company; or (c) solicit employees to leave the Company. Each of the employment agreement, the employment letter, and/or the Severance Plan, as applicable, also requires the executive not to use or disclose our confidential information or trade secrets during the term of his employment and for a period of five years thereafter or for so long as the trade secrets remain protected. In addition, the Company and each executive agree not to disparage each other during the term of employment or for a period of five years thereafter. If an executive breaches or threatens to breach such restrictions on conduct, we may immediately cease any severance benefits or refuse such payment and shall be entitled to recover from any such executive any amounts previously paid as a severance benefit.

Other Important Compensation Policies Affecting the Named Executive Officers

Claw-Back Policy

If a Named Executive Officer receives an award under the Company equity or cash incentive plans based on financial statements that are subsequently restated in a way that would decrease the amount of the award to which such Named Executive Officer was entitled and the restatement is based in whole or in part on the misconduct of the Named Executive Officer, then the Named Executive Officer will refund to the Company the difference between what they received and what they should have received. In addition, this policy requires the recoupment of any compensation to the extent mandated by all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. The Compensation Committee monitors laws, rules and regulations on claw-back policies and shall amend this policy as required to comply with any future new claw-back rules or regulations.

Stock Ownership Requirements

The Compensation Committee has adopted minimum ownership requirements for Company stock for the CEO, as well as for the other members of the Board of Directors. The ownership target for the CEO has been established as three times his annual base compensation. The other members of our Board of Directors have an ownership target of five times their $70,500 annual board cash retainer in Company securities. As of June 30, 2017, our CEO and all other members of our Board of Directors were in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines. Our CEO is expected to utilize grants under equity compensation plans to maintain the levels of ownership required by the policy. The policy also incorporates an equity retention requirement by requiring him to retain 50% of the net shares resulting from the vesting or exercise of certain awards to obtain the required ownership under the policy.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

Our Named Executive Officers and Directors are prohibited from holding Company securities in margin accounts or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan. Our Named Executive Officers and Directors also generally are prohibited from certain hedging transactions and any hedging transaction would require pre-approval from our General Counsel.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				33

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Post-Termination Restrictions and Compensation

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s Named Executive Officers should be provided with reasonable severance benefits in the event a Named Executive Officer is terminated under certain circumstances. Severance benefits for Named Executive Officers reflect the fact that the Named Executive Officer may not be able to find reasonably comparable employment within a reasonable period of time following a termination. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that certain post-termination benefits such as change of control payments will allow the Named Executive Officers to focus their time on potential transactions that may be beneficial to the Company, rather than have concern for their own employment prospects following a change of control. Severance benefits are provided under our employment agreements, employment letters and/or the Severance Plan, as applicable.

NON-COMPETE AND NON-SOLICITATION AGREEMENTS

Our Named Executive Officers are obligated pursuant to their employment agreements, employment letters, and/or the Severance Plan, as applicable, not to compete with the Company for a period of twenty-four months following their termination of employment with the Company. These agreements also restrict the Named Executive Officer’s disclosure and use of confidential information to which they were exposed during their employment. In addition, the agreements provide for restrictions on the solicitation of vendors, customers and employees of the Company for a period of twenty-four months following termination of employment.

SEVERANCE AND CHANGE OF CONTROL BENEFITS

In the event of a termination of employment by the Company other than for cause, death, disability, retirement, the expiration of the employment agreement, or by a Named Executive Officer for good reason, the Named Executive Officer will be entitled to a severance payment, provided that the Named Executive Officer is in, and remains in, compliance with the non-competition, confidentiality, non-solicitation and related covenants provided in his employment agreement or the Severance Plan. The amount of a severance payment varies based upon the Named Executive Officer’s historic compensation amounts and length of service to the Company, up to two and a half times the Chief Executive Officer’s and one and one-half times the other Named Executive Officer’s average annual base salary and variable compensation over the last three fiscal years prior to a termination. These potential payments are discussed in more detail under the caption “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Certain Events” below.

Our Named Executive Officers’ employment agreements, employment letters, and/or the Severance Plan, as applicable, provide for severance in the event of certain termination in connection with a change of control. Such severance payments will be made only if a “double trigger” is met. That is, both a change in control and a termination of employment are required. This is discussed in more detail under the caption “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Certain Events” below. The Compensation Committee believes this benefit is required to offer competitive benefits to attract and retain highly qualified executives.

Additional Compensation Matters

Consideration of Results of Shareholder Advisory Votes in Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee monitors the results of the “Say-on-Pay” vote and considers those results along with the objectives listed above in determining compensation policies. A substantial majority (over 95%) of our shareholders voting at the meeting approved the compensation described in our 2016 proxy statement. The Compensation Committee interpreted this vote result as a strong indication of support for our current compensation program.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices

We have assessed our compensation programs for all employees and have concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. We believe that our compensation program reflects an appropriate mix of compensation elements and balances current and long-term performance objectives, cash and equity compensation, and risks and rewards. During fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including our Named Executive Officers, particularly as they relate to risk management practices and risk-taking incentives. As part of its review, the Compensation Committee discussed with management the ways in which risk is effectively managed or mitigated as it relates to our compensation programs and policies.

34				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Based on this review, the Compensation Committee believes that our compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk but instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable value creation. The following features of our executive incentive compensation program illustrate this point.

Based on a combination of the above, we believe that (i) our Named Executive Officers and other employees are encouraged to manage the Company in a prudent manner because our compensation programs are aligned with our business strategy and risk profile, and (ii) our incentive programs are not designed to encourage our Named Executive Officers or other employees to take excessive risks or risks that are inconsistent with the Company’s and shareholders’ best interests. In addition, the Company has in place various controls and management processes that help mitigate the potential for incentive compensation plans to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				35

Compensation Committee Report

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with management. Based upon such review, the related discussions and such other matters deemed relevant and appropriate to the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2017 and in this Proxy Statement.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee:

Peter C. Browning, Chair

Michael J. Grainger

Steven R. Fischer

John P. Reilly

Charles R. Whitchurch

The Compensation Committee report does not constitute soliciting material, and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing under the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the Compensation Committee report by reference therein.

36				2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Compensation Tables

COMPENSATION TABLES

2017 Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes compensation paid to or accrued on behalf of the Named Executive Officers for the year ended June 30, 2017:

2017 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT				37

2017 All Other Compensation Table

2017 ALL OTHER COMPENSATION TABLE

The following supplemental table summarizes all other compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers for the year ended June 30, 2017, which is included in the All Other Compensation column in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table above: