QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )

  Filed by the Registrant ý

 
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

 
Check the appropriate box:

 
o
 
Preliminary Proxy Statement

 
o
 
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 
ý
 
Definitive Proxy Statement

 
o
 
Definitive Additional Materials

 
o
 
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.
 
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 
    
 
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý
 
No fee required.

o
 
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
    (1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
         
    (2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
         
    (3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
         
    (4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
         
    (5)   Total fee paid:
         

o
 
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o
 
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 
 
(1)
 
Amount Previously Paid:
         
    (2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
         
    (3)   Filing Party:
         
    (4)   Date Filed:
         

TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

30 North LaSalle Street
Suite 4000
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Phone: (312) 630-1900
Fax: (312) 630-9299		  
GRAPHIC

 
 
April 14, 2011

 
 
 

Dear Shareholders:

        You are cordially invited to attend our 2011 Annual Meeting of shareholders of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. ("TDS") on Thursday, May 19, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., Chicago time, at The Standard Club, 320 South Plymouth Court, Chicago, Illinois.

        The formal notice of the meeting and our board of directors' Proxy Statement are enclosed. Also enclosed is our 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders. At our 2011 Annual Meeting, shareholders are being asked to take the following actions:

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" its nominees for election as directors, "FOR" the proposal to ratify accountants and "FOR" approval of the Say-on-Pay proposal. The board of directors also unanimously recommends that shareholders vote for holding future Say-on-Pay votes "EVERY YEAR".

        In addition, as required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Proxy Statement includes a proposal submitted by a shareholder of TDS calling for the board of directors to take steps to adopt a plan for all of TDS' outstanding stock to have one vote per share. The board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote "AGAINST" this proposal.

        As noted above, the Say-on-Pay proposal asks shareholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

        TDS operates in highly competitive markets through its primary business units, United States Cellular Corporation ("U.S. Cellular") and TDS Telecommunications Corporation ("TDS Telecom"), and needs to and has been able to attract and retain high-quality executives. We believe that our compensation practices are transparent and reflect our commitment to align compensation with our business strategy and our short- and long-term performance.

        Highlights of the TDS compensation programs:

2010 Compensation

        Our executive officers' compensation is comprised of a mix of base salary, annual cash bonuses and equity-based, long-term incentive awards.

        We encourage you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a detailed discussion and analysis of our executive compensation program, including information about the fiscal 2010 compensation of the named executive officers.

        We would like to have as many shareholders as possible represented at the meeting. Therefore, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please sign and return the enclosed white proxy card(s), or vote on the Internet in accordance with the instructions set forth on the proxy card(s).

        We look forward to visiting with you at the Annual Meeting.

Very truly yours,

GRAPHIC
 
GRAPHIC
Walter C.D. Carlson
Chairman of the Board		   LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
AND
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 2011

TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF

TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.

        The 2011 Annual Meeting of shareholders of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held at The Standard Club, 320 South Plymouth Court, Chicago, Illinois, on Thursday, May 19, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., Chicago time, for the following purposes:

        We are first mailing this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement to you on or about April 15, 2011. We have fixed the close of business on March 30, 2011, as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

        The following additional information is being provided as required by SEC rules:

        The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.teldta.com under Investor Relations—Proxy Vote, or at www.teldta.com/proxyvote.

        The following items have been posted to this website:

        Any control/identification numbers that you need to vote are set forth on your proxy card(s) if you are a record holder, or on your voting instruction card if you hold shares through a broker, dealer or bank.

        The location where the Annual Meeting will be held is the Standard Club in Chicago, Illinois. This is located in the Chicago loop area between Jackson Boulevard and Van Buren Street at 320 South Plymouth Court, which is between State Street and Dearborn Street.

1


 SUMMARY

        The following is a summary of the actions being taken at the 2011 Annual Meeting and does not include all of the information that may be important to you. You should carefully read this entire Proxy Statement and not rely solely on the following summary.

Proposal 1—Election of Directors

        Under TDS' Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, the terms of all incumbent directors will expire at the 2011 Annual Meeting.

        Holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares, voting as a group, will be entitled to elect eight directors. Your board of directors has nominated the following incumbent directors for election by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares: LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Letitia G. Carlson, M.D., Prudence E. Carlson, Walter C.D. Carlson, Kenneth R. Meyers, Donald C. Nebergall, George W. Off and Mitchell H. Saranow.

        Holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares, voting as a group, will be entitled to elect four directors. Your board of directors has nominated the following incumbent directors for election by the holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares: Clarence A. Davis, Christopher D. O'Leary, Gary L. Sugarman and Herbert S. Wander.

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" its nominees for election as directors.

Proposal 2—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2011

        As in prior years, shareholders are being asked to ratify PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2011.

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" this proposal.

Proposal 3—Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation or "Say-on-Pay"

        As required by the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"), beginning at the 2011 Annual Meeting, shareholders are being asked to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote "FOR" this proposal.

Proposal 4—Advisory Vote on Frequency of Say-on-Pay Votes or "Say-on-Frequency"

        As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, beginning at the 2011 Annual Meeting, shareholders are being asked to vote to advise whether future Say-on-Pay votes should be held every one, two or three years.

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote for holding future Say-on-Pay votes EVERY YEAR.

Proposal 5—Proposal Submitted by a Shareholder

        As required by the rules of the SEC, the Proxy Statement includes a proposal submitted by a shareholder of TDS calling for the board of directors to take steps to adopt a plan for all of TDS' outstanding stock to have one vote per share.

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote "AGAINST" this proposal.

2


 VOTING INFORMATION

What is the record date for the meeting?

        The close of business on March 30, 2011 is the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

        A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, arranged in alphabetical order and by voting group, showing the address of and number of shares held by each shareholder, will be made available at the offices of TDS, 30 North LaSalle Street, 40th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60602, for examination by any shareholder during normal business hours, for a period of at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.

What shares of stock entitle holders to vote at the meeting?

        We have the following classes of stock outstanding, each of which entitles holders to vote at the meeting:

        The Common Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "TDS." The Special Common Shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol "TDS.S."

        No public market exists for the Series A Common Shares, but the Series A Common Shares are convertible on a share-for-share basis into Common Shares or Special Common Shares.

        No public market exists for the Preferred Shares. The Preferred Shares are divided into series, none of which is currently convertible into any class of common stock. All holders of Preferred Shares vote together with the holders of Common Shares and Series A Common Shares, except in the election of directors. In the election of directors, all holders of Preferred Shares vote together with the holders of Series A Common Shares.

What is the voting power of the outstanding shares in the election of directors?

        The following shows information relating to the outstanding shares and voting power of such shares in the election of directors as of the record date:

Class of Stock
  Outstanding
Shares 		  Votes per
Share 		  Voting Power   Total Number of
Directors
Elected by
Voting Group
and Standing for
Election 		 

Series A Common Shares

     6,509,968     10     65,099,680        

Preferred Shares

     8,300     1     8,300        
                         
 

Subtotal

                 65,107,980     8  
                         

Common Shares

     49,896,824     1     49,896,824        

Special Common Shares

     47,288,552     1     47,288,552        
                         
 

Subtotal

                 97,185,376     4  
                       
 

Total Directors

                       12  
                         

3

What is the voting power of the outstanding shares in matters other than the election of directors?

        The following shows information relating to the outstanding shares and voting power of such shares in matters other than the election of directors as of the record date:

Class of Stock
  Outstanding
Shares 		  Votes per
Share 		  Total Voting
Power 		  Percent  

Series A Common Shares

     6,509,968     10     65,099,680     56.6 %

Common Shares

    
49,896,824		    
1		    
49,896,824		    
43.4
%

Preferred Shares

    
8,300		    
1		    
8,300		    
*		  
                       

               
115,004,804		    
100.0
%
                       
*
Less than .1%

        Other than as required by law or regulation, holders of Special Common Shares do not have any right to vote on any matters except in the election of certain directors, as described above. Accordingly, actions submitted to a vote of shareholders other than the election of directors will be voted on only by holders of Common Shares, Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares.

How may shareholders vote with respect to the election of directors in Proposal 1?

        Shareholders may, with respect to directors to be elected by such shareholders:

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR its nominees for election as directors.

How may shareholders vote with respect to the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2011 in Proposal 2?

        Shareholders may, with respect to the proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2011:

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

How may shareholders vote with respect to Say-on-Pay in Proposal 3?

        Shareholders may, with respect to Say-on-Pay:

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR this proposal.

How may shareholders vote with respect to Say-on-Frequency in Proposal 4?

        Shareholders may, with respect to Say-on-Frequency in Proposal 4, vote for the Say-on-Pay vote to be held:

4

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends a vote for holding future Say-on-Pay votes EVERY YEAR.

How may shareholders vote with respect to the shareholder proposal in Proposal 5?

        Shareholders may, with respect to the shareholder proposal:

        Your board of directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.

How does the TDS Voting Trust intend to vote?

        The Voting Trust under Agreement dated June 30, 1989, as amended (the "TDS Voting Trust"), holds 6,159,631 Series A Common Shares on the record date, representing approximately 94.6% of the Series A Common Shares. By reason of such holding, the TDS Voting Trust has the voting power to elect all of the directors to be elected by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares and has approximately 53.6% of the voting power with respect to matters other than the election of directors. The TDS Voting Trust holds 6,083,574 Special Common Shares on the record date, representing approximately 12.9% of the Special Common Shares. By reason of such holding, the TDS Voting Trust has approximately 6.3% of the voting power with respect to the election of directors elected by the holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares. The TDS Voting Trust does not currently own Common Shares or Preferred Shares.

        The TDS Voting Trust has advised us that it intends to vote:

How do I vote?

        Proxies are being requested from the holders of Common Shares in connection with the election of four directors in Proposal 1 and in connection with Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5.

        Proxies are being requested from the holders of Special Common Shares only in connection with the election of four directors in Proposal 1.

        Proxies are being requested from the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares in connection with the election of eight directors in Proposal 1 and in connection with Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5.

        Whether or not you intend to be present at the 2011 Annual Meeting, please sign and mail your proxy card(s) in the enclosed self-addressed envelope to Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43126, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-5138, or vote on the Internet using the control/

5


identification number on your proxy card(s) and in accordance with the instructions set forth on the proxy card(s). If you hold more than one class of our shares, you will find enclosed a separate proxy card for each holding. To assure that all your shares are represented, please vote on the Internet or return the enclosed proxy card(s) by mail as follows:

How will proxies be voted?

        All properly executed and unrevoked proxies received in the enclosed form in time for our 2011 Annual Meeting of shareholders will be voted in the manner directed on the proxies.

        If no direction is made on the applicable proxy card(s), a proxy by any shareholder will be voted FOR the election of the board of directors' nominees to serve as directors in Proposal 1, FOR Proposal 2, FOR Proposal 3, for holding Say-on-Pay votes EVERY YEAR in Proposal 4 and AGAINST Proposal 5.

        Proxies given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked at any time prior to the voting of the shares at the Annual Meeting by written notice to the Secretary of TDS, by submitting a later dated proxy or by attendance and voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

        Because the board of directors has no knowledge of any other proposals to be presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting and because no other proposals were received by TDS by the date specified by the advance notice provision in TDS' Bylaws, the proxy solicited by the board of directors for the 2011 Annual Meeting confers discretionary authority to the proxies named therein to vote on any matter that may properly come before such meeting or any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof, other than the foregoing proposals.

How will my shares be voted if I own shares through a broker?

        If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in "street name" by a broker, bank, or other nominee ("broker"), such broker, as the record holder of the shares, is required to vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give specific instructions to the broker or have standing instructions on file with the broker, under Rule 452 of the NYSE as amended in 2009, depending on the timing of certain actions, the broker may be entitled to vote the shares with respect to "discretionary" items but will not be permitted to vote the shares with respect to "non-discretionary" items (in which case such shares will be treated as "broker non-votes"). In addition, whether the broker can or will vote your shares with respect to discretionary items if you have not given instructions to the broker and how such shares may be voted by the broker (i.e., proportionately with voting instructions received by the broker from other shareholders or pursuant to the recommendation of management, etc.) depend on the particular broker's policies. As a result, we cannot advise you whether your broker will or will not vote your shares or how it may vote the shares if it does not receive or have voting instructions from you and, accordingly, recommend that you contact your broker. In general, the ratification of auditors is a discretionary item. On the other hand, matters such as the election of directors (whether contested or not), votes on Say-on-Pay and Say-on-Frequency, the approval of an equity compensation plan and shareholder proposals are non-discretionary items. In such cases, if your broker does not have specific or standing instructions, your shares will be treated as "broker non-votes" and will not be voted on such matters. Accordingly, we urge you to provide instructions to your broker so that your votes may be counted on all matters. If your shares are held in street name, your broker will include a voting instruction card with this Proxy Statement. We strongly encourage you to vote your shares by following

6


the instructions provided on the voting instruction card. Please return your voting instruction card to your broker and/or contact your broker to ensure that a proxy card is voted on your behalf.

What constitutes a quorum for the meeting?

        A majority of the voting power of shares of capital stock in matters other than the election of directors and entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum to permit the Annual Meeting to proceed. Withheld votes and abstentions of shares entitled to vote and broker "non-votes" will be treated as present in person or represented by proxy for purposes of establishing a quorum for the meeting. If such a quorum is present or represented by proxy, the meeting can proceed. If the shares beneficially owned by the TDS Voting Trust are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, such shares will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting to permit the meeting to proceed. In addition, where a separate vote by a class or group is required with respect to a proposal, a quorum is also required with respect to such proposal for the vote to proceed with respect to such proposal.

        In the election of directors, the holders of a majority of the votes of the stock of such class or group issued and outstanding and entitled to vote with respect to such director, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum with respect to such election. Withheld votes by shares entitled to vote with respect to a director and broker "non-votes" with respect to such director will be treated as present in person or represented by proxy for purposes of establishing a quorum for the election of such director. If Series A Common Shares beneficially owned by the TDS Voting Trust are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, such shares will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting in connection with the election of directors by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares. If a quorum of the holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares is not present at the time the Annual Meeting is convened, the chairman of the meeting or holders of a majority of the voting power in matters other than the election of directors represented in person or by proxy may adjourn or postpone the Annual Meeting.

        With respect to Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5, the holders of a majority of the votes of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote with respect to such proposals, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting in connection with such proposals. Abstentions from voting on such proposals by shares entitled to vote on such proposals and broker "non-votes" with respect to such proposals will be treated as present in person or represented by proxy for purposes of establishing a quorum for such proposals. If TDS shares beneficially owned by the TDS Voting Trust are present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, such shares will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting in connection with such proposals.

        Even if a quorum is present, holders of a majority of the voting stock represented in person or by proxy may adjourn or postpone the Annual Meeting. Because it holds a majority of the voting power of all classes of stock, the TDS Voting Trust has the voting power to approve an adjournment or postponement. TDS does not currently have any expectation that the Annual Meeting would be adjourned or postponed for any reason. However, if there is a proposal to adjourn or postpone the Annual Meeting by a vote of the stockholders, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will have discretionary authority to vote with respect to such adjournment or postponement.

What vote is required to elect directors in Proposal 1?

        Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in the election of directors by the class or group of stockholders entitled to vote in the election of such directors which are present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting.

        Accordingly, if a quorum exists, the persons receiving a plurality of the votes cast by shareholders entitled to vote with respect to the election of such directors will be elected to serve as a director. Withheld votes and broker non-votes with respect to the election of such directors will not be counted as votes cast for purposes of determining if a director has received a plurality of the votes.

7

What vote is required with respect to Proposals 2, 3 and 5?

        The holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares and Series A Common Shares will vote together as a single group with respect to Proposals 2, 3 and 5. Each holder of outstanding Common Shares or Preferred Shares is entitled to one vote for each Common Share or Preferred Share held in such holder's name. Each holder of Series A Common Shares is entitled to ten votes for each Series A Common Share held in such holder's name.

        If a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, the approval of Proposals 2, 3 and 5 will require the affirmative vote of the holders of stock having a majority of the votes which could be cast by the holders of all stock entitled to vote on such question which are present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting. Abstentions by shares entitled to vote on such proposals will be treated as votes which could be cast that are present for such purposes and, accordingly, will effectively count as a vote cast against such proposal. Broker non-votes with respect to such proposals will not be included in the total of votes which could be cast which are present for purposes of determining whether such proposals are approved, even though they may be included for purposes of determining a quorum.

What vote is required with respect to Proposal 4?

        The holders of Common Shares, Preferred Shares and Series A Common Shares will vote together as a single group with respect to Proposal 4. Each holder of outstanding Common Shares or Preferred Shares is entitled to one vote for each Common Share or Preferred Share held in such holder's name. Each holder of Series A Common Shares is entitled to ten votes for each Series A Common Share held in such holder's name.

        Accordingly, if a quorum exists, the frequency receiving a plurality of the votes cast by shareholders entitled to vote with respect to Proposal 4 will be considered to be the shareholders' recommendation as to the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes. Withheld votes and broker non-votes with respect to Proposal 4 will not be counted as votes cast for purposes of Proposal 4.

8


 PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        The terms of all incumbent directors will expire at the 2011 Annual Meeting. The board of directors' nominees for election of directors are identified in the tables below. Each of the nominees has consented to be named in the Proxy Statement and consented to serve if elected. In the event any such nominee fails to stand for election, the persons named in the proxy presently intend to vote for a substitute nominee if one is designated by the board of directors.

To be Elected by Holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares

Name
  Age   Position with TDS and Principal Occupation   Served as
Director
since
Clarence A. Davis   69   Director of TDS and Business Consultant   2009

Christopher D. O'Leary
 
51
 
Director of TDS and Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer—International of General Mills, Inc.
 
2006

Gary L. Sugarman
 
58
 
Director of TDS, Executive Chairman of FXecosystem, Inc., Managing Member—Richfield Capital Partners and Principal of Richfield Associates, Inc.
 
2009

Herbert S. Wander
 
76
 
Director of TDS and Partner, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, Illinois
 
1968

To be Elected by Holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares

Name
  Age   Position with TDS and Principal Occupation   Served as
Director
since
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.    64   Director and President and Chief Executive Officer of TDS   1968

Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. 
 
50
 
Director of TDS and Physician and Associate Clinical Professor at George Washington University Medical Center
 
1996

Prudence E. Carlson
 
59
 
Director of TDS and Private Investor
 
2008

Walter C.D. Carlson
 
57
 
Director and non-executive Chairman of the Board of TDS and Partner, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois
 
1981

Kenneth R. Meyers
 
57
 
Director and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TDS
 
2007

Donald C. Nebergall
 
82
 
Director of TDS and Consultant
 
1977

George W. Off
 
64
 
Director of TDS, Private Investor and retired Director and Chairman of Checkpoint Systems, Inc.
 
1997

Mitchell H. Saranow
 
65
 
Director of TDS and Chairman of The Saranow Group, L.L.C.
 
2004

Background of Board of Directors' Nominees

        The following briefly describes the business experience during at least the past five years of each of the nominees, including each person's principal occupation(s) and employment during at least the past five years; the name and principal business of any corporation or other organization in which such occupation(s) and employment were carried on; and whether such corporation or organization is a parent, subsidiary or other affiliate of TDS. The following also indicates any other directorships held, including any other directorships held during at least the past five years, by each nominee in any SEC registered company or any investment company, and the identity of such company.

        In addition, the following also briefly discusses the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that each such person should serve as a director for TDS, in light of TDS'

9


business and structure, including information about the person's particular areas of expertise or other relevant qualifications. As discussed below under "Director Nomination Process", TDS does not have any specific, minimum qualifications that the board believes must be met by a nominee for a position on the TDS board of directors, or any specific qualities or skills that the board believes are necessary for one or more of the TDS directors to possess. The TDS board believes that substantial judgment, diligence and care are required to identify and select qualified persons as directors. The TDS board has consistently sought to nominate to the board of directors eminently qualified individuals whom the board believes would provide substantial benefit and guidance to TDS. Also as discussed below, TDS believes that it is desirable for directors to have diverse backgrounds, experience, skills and other characteristics. In addition, the conclusion of which persons should serve as directors of TDS is based in part on the fact that TDS is a controlled company with a capital structure in which different classes of stock vote for different directorships. In particular, as discussed under "Director Nomination Process", because the TDS Voting Trust has over 90% of the voting power in the election of directors elected by holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares, nominations of directors for election by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares are based on the recommendation of the trustees of the TDS Voting Trust.

Nominees for Election by Holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares

        Clarence A. Davis.    Clarence A. Davis initially was nominated to the TDS board of directors pursuant to a Settlement Agreement dated April 24, 2009 between GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. and TDS (the "Settlement Agreement"). Although TDS initially nominated Mr. Davis to the TDS board of directors in 2009 as part of such settlement, after observing the performance and contributions of Mr. Davis on the TDS board of directors since that time, the TDS board of directors determined to re-nominate Mr. Davis to the TDS board of directors in 2010 and 2011. In addition, Mr. Davis was appointed to the TDS Audit Committee in 2010. The following provides information on the background of Mr. Davis, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

        Mr. Davis is currently a business consultant.

        Mr. Davis was previously a director of Nestor, Inc., a software solutions company (formerly NASDAQ: NEST), and was a member and the chairman of Nestor's audit committee. He was the chief executive officer of Nestor from August 2007 until January 2009. Within the last ten years, Nestor successfully petitioned the Rhode Island Superior Court for a court-appointed receiver who assumed all aspects of the company's operations in June 2009. The receiver sold the assets of Nestor to American Traffic Solutions in September 2009. Mr. Davis ceased to be a director of Nestor at that time.

        From May 2006 to August 2007, Mr. Davis was an independent consultant, and from September 2005 through May 2006, he served as consultant to the National Headquarters, American Red Cross.

        Prior thereto, Mr. Davis was employed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA"), serving as chief financial officer from 1998 through 2000 and chief operating officer from 2000 through 2005. Mr. Davis was an accountant at the public accounting firm of Spicer & Oppenheim and a predecessor public accounting firm between 1967 and 1990, and was a partner at such firm between 1979 and 1990. Mr. Davis is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive). Mr. Davis has a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Long Island University.

        Mr. Davis is, and has been since 2007, a member of the board of directors and board of trustees of The Gabelli SRI Fund and The Gabelli Global Deal Fund, respectively, which are registered investment companies that are managed by an affiliate of GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. Mr. Davis is a member of the audit committee of each of such funds. (As noted above, TDS entered into a Settlement Agreement with GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. in 2009 that resulted in the nomination of Mr. Davis as a director of TDS.)

        In addition, since 2009, Mr. Davis has been a director of Pennichuck Corp. (Nasdaq: PNNW), a water utility company in New Hampshire, and Sonesta International Hotels (Nasdaq: SNSTA), a company that operates hotels. Mr. Davis is a member of the audit committee of each of such companies.

10

        Also, in 2011, Mr. Davis was appointed as a director of Bizequity.com, a private company and website that provides capital, knowledge and talent for emerging growth companies.

        Mr. Davis was appointed to the TDS Audit Committee on May 26, 2010. The board of directors determined that his simultaneous service on the foregoing two public company audit committees and the two fund audit committees would not impair his ability to effectively serve on the TDS Audit Committee.

        Between 2005 and 2006, Mr. Davis was a director of Oneida Ltd., a privately-held company which designs and distributes stainless steel and silverplated flatware.

        Mr. Davis has been a member of the Finance Council of the Diocese of Savannah, Georgia, since 2010.

        Mr. Davis brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications as a director and former chief executive officer of a public technology company, as a chief financial officer and chief operating officer of the AICPA and as a director or trustee of investment funds. In addition, he has substantial experience, expertise and qualifications in accounting as a result of having been a chief financial officer of the AICPA and a Certified Public Accountant in a public accounting firm for many years, and as a result of being or having been a member of six audit committees, including the TDS Audit Committee since 2010. Further, his background and attributes bring diversity to the board.

        Christopher D. O'Leary.    Christopher D. O'Leary has been a director of TDS since 2006 and was initially nominated as a director based on a search conducted by TDS' executive search firm. He is also a member of the TDS Compensation Committee. The following provides information on the background of Mr. O'Leary, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

        In June 2006, Christopher D. O'Leary was appointed executive vice president, chief operating officer—international of General Mills, Inc. (NYSE: GIS), which manufactures and markets branded consumer foods on a worldwide basis. In this capacity, he oversees over 14,000 employees in over 100 countries. Before that, he was a senior vice president of General Mills since 1999. In addition, he was the president of the General Mills Meals division between 2001 and 2006 and was president of the Betty Crocker division between 1999 and 2001. Mr. O'Leary joined General Mills in 1997.

        Prior to his employment with General Mills, Mr. O'Leary was employed for 17 years with PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP), which manufactures, markets, and sells various snacks, beverages and foods on a worldwide basis. His assignments included leadership roles for the Walkers-Smiths business in the United Kingdom and the Hostess Frito-Lay business in Canada.

        Mr. O'Leary has an MBA from New York University.

        Mr. O'Leary brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications in retail and marketing as a result of over 30 years experience in retail and marketing. In addition, Mr. O'Leary has over 15 years of significant and high-level experience in management of large retail businesses with a large number of employees, including businesses outside the U.S. Because of the retail nature of the TDS businesses, the TDS board of directors believes that it is highly desirable to have a director with significant knowledge and experience in retail and marketing, as well as significant, high-level experience in managing retail businesses.

        Gary L. Sugarman.    Gary L. Sugarman initially was nominated to the TDS board of directors pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. and TDS. Although TDS initially nominated Mr. Sugarman to the TDS board of directors in 2009 as part of such settlement, after observing the performance and contributions of Mr. Sugarman on the TDS board of directors since that time, the TDS board of directors determined to re-nominate Mr. Sugarman to the TDS board of directors in 2010 and 2011. In addition, Mr. Sugarman was appointed to the TDS Compensation Committee in 2010. The following provides information on the background of Mr. Sugarman, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

11

        Mr. Sugarman founded and has been the Managing Member of Richfield Capital Partners, a private venture capital firm since 2010. Mr. Sugarman is also principal of Richfield Associates, Inc., a privately-held telecom investment/merchant banking firm he founded in 1994.

        In November 2010, Richfield Capital Partners invested in FXecosystem, Inc., a private infrastructure provider to foreign exchange markets. In connection with this investment, Mr. Sugarman became a director and Executive Chairman of FXecosystem, Inc.

        Previously, Mr. Sugarman was the executive chairman of Veroxity Technology Partners, a privately held facilities-based fiber network provider, between December 2007 and September 2010.

        Mr. Sugarman was on the board of directors of PrairieWave Communications, Inc., a privately-held over-builder providing telecommunications and cable television service in South Dakota, Iowa and Minnesota, from 2003 until it was sold in 2007.

        Prior to that, he served as chairman and chief executive officer of Mid-Maine Communications, a privately-held facilities-based telecom company, from the time he co-founded the company in 1994 until it was sold in 2006.

        Prior thereto, Mr. Sugarman held various operating positions at Rochester Telephone Company, (now known as Frontier Corporation (NYSE: FTR)), a public telecommunications company, from 1984 to 1991, including as Director of Business Development, in which capacity he was involved in many acquisitions and other development activities in the telecommunications industry.

        Mr. Sugarman is currently a director of LICT Corporation, a telecommunications company that is quoted on the Pink Sheets. (Mario J. Gabelli, who is the chairman of and may be deemed to control LICT Corporation, controls GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. As noted above, TDS entered into a Settlement Agreement with GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. in 2009 that resulted in the nomination of Mr. Sugarman as a director of TDS.)

        Mr. Sugarman has an MBA from the University at Buffalo—State University of New York.

        Mr. Sugarman brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications in the telecommunications industry as a result of his current position at LICT and his many years of prior experience with other companies in the telecommunications industry. Mr. Sugarman also has management experience as executive chairman of Veroxity and as chairman and chief executive officer of Mid-Maine Communications, a company that he co-founded, has been a director of business development of a public telecommunications company and has substantial experience in acquisitions and development activities in the telecommunications industry.

        Herbert S. Wander.    Herbert S. Wander has been on the TDS board of directors since the time that TDS was founded in 1968. He is also a member of the TDS Audit Committee and a member and chairperson of the TDS Compensation Committee. The following provides information on the background of Mr. Wander, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

        Herbert S. Wander has been a partner of the law firm of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP for more than 30 years. He has been a lawyer for over 50 years, concentrating on all aspects of business law, including corporate governance and business acquisitions. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP does not provide legal services to TDS or its subsidiaries.

        In 2004, Mr. Wander was appointed by the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), William Donaldson, to Chair the SEC Advisory Committee on smaller public companies, which committee delivered its final report to the SEC in 2006.

        Mr. Wander is the former Chair of the Corporate Laws Committee of the American Bar Association's Business Law Section and former Chair of the Business Law Section. Mr. Wander is a frequent lecturer on topics of corporate governance.

12

        Mr. Wander served two terms as a member of the Legal Advisory Committee to the NYSE Board of Governors and was a member of the Legal Advisory Committee to the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.

        In addition, Mr. Wander has significant experience with the telecommunications industry and TDS as a director of TDS for over 40 years, as a member of the TDS Audit Committee for over 15 years and as a member of the TDS Compensation Committee for over 5 years.

        Mr. Wander has also previously served as a director of Advance Ross Corporation (formerly Nasdaq: AROS), the primary business of which was operating a value-added tax (VAT) refund service in Europe.

        Mr. Wander has a law degree from Yale Law School.

        Mr. Wander brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications, with a national reputation as a corporate and acquisitions lawyer and as a corporate governance expert. He also brings to the board substantial experience, expertise and qualifications with TDS and the telecommunications industry as a result of his many years as a director of TDS and as a member of the TDS Audit Committee and the TDS Compensation Committee.

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" each of the above nominees for election by the holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares.

Nominees for Election by Holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares

        LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.    LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. has been a director of TDS since the time that TDS was founded. He is also a member of the TDS Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The following provides information on the background of Mr. Carlson, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

        LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. is TDS' President and Chief Executive Officer (an executive officer of TDS). He has been TDS' President since 1981 and its Chief Executive Officer since 1986.

        LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. has been a director of United States Cellular Corporation (NYSE: USM), a subsidiary of TDS which operates and invests in wireless telephone companies and properties ("U.S. Cellular"), since 1984, and has been its Chairman (an executive officer) since 1989. He has also been a director of TDS Telecommunications Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of TDS which operates local telephone companies ("TDS Telecom"), and its Chairman (an executive officer) for over 20 years.

        Mr. Carlson was previously a director of former TDS subsidiaries Aerial Communications, Inc. (formerly Nasdaq: AERL), which developed and operated wireless personal communications services, and American Paging, Inc. (formerly AMEX: APP), which operated wireless paging services.

        Mr. Carlson has an MBA from Harvard University.

        Mr. Carlson is one of the four largest beneficial owners of TDS Series A Common Shares and also beneficially owns a significant number of TDS Special Common Shares.

        Mr. Carlson brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications with respect to TDS and the telecommunications industry as a result of his many years as a director and President and Chief Executive Officer of TDS, and as a director and Chairman of its two principal business units. As the senior executive officer of TDS and each of its business units, the board of directors considers it essential that Mr. Carlson serve on the TDS board to provide the board with his views on strategy and operations of TDS and its business units. In addition, as a shareholder with a significant economic stake in TDS, Mr. Carlson provides to the TDS board of directors the perspective of shareholders in managing and operating TDS in the best long-term interests of shareholders.

        LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. is the son of LeRoy T. Carlson and the brother of Walter C.D. Carlson, Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. and Prudence E. Carlson.

13

        Letitia G. Carlson, M.D.    Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. has been a director of TDS for 13 years. The following provides information on the background of Dr. Carlson, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that she should serve as a director of TDS.

        Dr. Carlson has been a physician at George Washington University Medical Center for twenty years.

        At such medical center, she was a primary care fellow between 1990 and 1992, an assistant professor between 1992 and 2001 and an assistant clinical professor between 2001 and 2003, and has been an associate clinical professor since 2003.

        Dr. Carlson has an M.D. from Harvard Medical School.

        Dr. Carlson is one of the four largest beneficial owners of TDS Series A Common Shares and also beneficially owns a significant number of TDS Special Common Shares.

        Dr. Carlson brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications with respect to TDS and the telecommunications industry as a result of her 13 years as a director of TDS. Further, her background and attributes bring diversity to the board. In addition, as a shareholder with a significant economic stake in TDS, Dr. Carlson provides to the TDS board of directors the perspective of shareholders in managing and operating TDS in the best long-term interests of shareholders.

        Dr. Carlson is the daughter of LeRoy T. Carlson and the sister of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Walter C.D. Carlson and Prudence E. Carlson.

        Prudence E. Carlson.    Prudence E. Carlson has been a director of TDS since 2008 and was initially elected as a director based on the recommendation of the trustees of the TDS Voting Trust, which holds over 90% of the Series A Common Shares. The following provides information on the background of Ms. Carlson, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that she should serve as a director of TDS.

        Ms. Carlson has a Bachelor of Arts degree from Harvard University.

        Ms. Carlson has been a private investor for more than five years. Ms. Carlson is one of the four largest beneficial owners of TDS Series A Common Shares and also beneficially owns a significant number of TDS Special Common Shares.

        Ms. Carlson is the daughter of LeRoy T. Carlson and the sister of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Walter C.D. Carlson and Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. and is a trustee of the TDS Voting Trust. Ms. Carlson was elected to the TDS board of directors in 2008 to fill the vacancy created on the board of directors by the decision of LeRoy T. Carlson not to stand for election in 2008. As a director elected by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares, the decision to nominate Ms. Carlson was based primarily on the recommendation of the trustees of the TDS Voting Trust.

        Ms. Carlson brings to the TDS board of directors experience with respect to TDS and the telecommunications industry as a result of her background as an investor in TDS for many years, as a trustee of the TDS Voting Trust, and as a director of TDS, and brings diversity of background and attributes to the board. In addition, as a shareholder with a significant economic stake in TDS, Ms. Carlson provides to the TDS board of directors the perspective of shareholders in managing and operating TDS in the best long-term interests of shareholders.

        Walter C.D. Carlson.    Walter C.D. Carlson has been a director of TDS for 30 years. He is also a member and chairperson of the TDS Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The following provides information on the background of Mr. Carlson, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

        Mr. Carlson was elected non-executive Chairman of the Board of TDS in 2002.

        Mr. Carlson has been a partner of the law firm of Sidley Austin LLP for more than 20 years and is a member of its executive committee. Mr. Carlson is an experienced litigator, and has represented various clients in a variety of types of specialized and general commercial litigation. Mr. Carlson is the head of the Financial and Securities Litigation group in the Chicago office of Sidley Austin LLP. The law firm of

14


Sidley Austin LLP provides legal services to TDS and its subsidiaries on a regular basis. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below. Walter C.D. Carlson does not provide legal services to TDS, U.S. Cellular or their subsidiaries.

        Mr. Carlson has been a director of U.S. Cellular (NYSE: USM) since 1989.

        Mr. Carlson was previously a director of former TDS subsidiary Aerial Communications, Inc. (formerly Nasdaq: AERL).

        Mr. Carlson has a J.D. from Harvard University.

        Mr. Carlson is one of the four largest beneficial owners of TDS Series A Common Shares and also beneficially owns a significant number of TDS Special Common Shares.

        Mr. Carlson brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications with respect to TDS and the telecommunications industry as a result of his many years as a director of TDS and U.S. Cellular and as Chairman of the Board of TDS, and as a result of having represented many corporate clients. In addition, as a shareholder with a significant economic stake in TDS, Mr. Carlson provides to the TDS board of directors the perspective of shareholders in managing and operating TDS in the best long-term interests of shareholders.

        Walter C.D. Carlson is the son of LeRoy T. Carlson and the brother of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. and Prudence E. Carlson.

        Kenneth R. Meyers.    Kenneth R. Meyers was appointed a director of TDS on January 1, 2007. The following provides information on the background of Mr. Meyers, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

        Mr. Meyers was appointed as a director of TDS in connection with his appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TDS (an executive officer of TDS), and Chief Accounting Officer (an executive officer) of U.S. Cellular and of TDS Telecom, on January 1, 2007.

        Prior to that time, he was the Executive Vice President—Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of U.S. Cellular since 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Meyers was Senior Vice President-Finance (Chief Financial Officer) and Treasurer of U.S. Cellular from 1997 to 1999 and was the Vice President-Finance (Chief Financial Officer) and Treasurer of U.S. Cellular for more than five years prior to 1997. Mr. Meyers had been employed by U.S. Cellular in accounting and financial capacities since 1987.

        Mr. Meyers has also been a director of U.S. Cellular since 1999 and a director of TDS Telecom since 2007.

        Mr. Meyers is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and has an MBA from Northwestern University's J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management.

        Mr. Meyers brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications with respect to TDS and the telecommunications industry as a result of his background as a director and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TDS since 2007, and his many years as a director and Executive Vice President—Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and in other positions at U.S. Cellular. He also brings substantial experience, expertise and qualifications in management, finance and accounting as a result of such background.

        Donald C. Nebergall.    Donald C. Nebergall has been a director of TDS for over 30 years. He is also a member of the TDS Audit Committee. The following provides information on the background of Mr. Nebergall, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

        Mr. Nebergall has been a consultant to companies since 1988, including TDS from 1988 to 2002.

        Mr. Nebergall was vice president of The Chapman Company, a privately-held registered investment advisory company located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, from 1986 to 1988.

        Prior to that, he was the chairman of Brenton Bank & Trust Company, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, from 1982 to 1986, and was its president from 1972 to 1982.

15

        Mr. Nebergall also is or has been a board member of several private, civic and charitable organizations.

        Mr. Nebergall also manages several family farms.

        Mr. Nebergall has a Bachelor of Science degree in Agricultural Economics from Iowa State University.

        Mr. Nebergall brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications with respect to TDS and the telecommunications industry as a result of his many years as a director of TDS and his prior background as a consultant to TDS. He also brings experience and knowledge as a result of his background in investment advisory services and banking and as a result of his board service for several organizations.

        George W. Off.    George W. Off has been a director of TDS since 1997 and was initially nominated as a director based on a search conducted by TDS' executive search firm. He is also a member of the TDS Compensation Committee and a member and chairperson of the TDS Audit Committee. The following provides information on the background of Mr. Off, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

        Before he retired, Mr. Off was a director of Checkpoint Systems, Inc (NYSE: CKP) from 2002 to 2009, and was its chairman between 2002 and 2008. He was also the chief executive officer of Checkpoint Systems, Inc. between 2002 and 2007. Checkpoint Systems is a multinational manufacturer and marketer of integrated system solutions for retail security, labeling and merchandising.

        Prior to that, Mr. Off was chairman of the board of directors of Catalina Marketing Corporation, a provider of in-store electronic marketing services, which at the time was a NYSE listed company (formerly NYSE: POS), from 1998 until 2000. Mr. Off served as president and chief executive officer of Catalina from 1994 to 1998.

        Mr. Off is a director of Infinian Mobile Commerce & Analytic Solutions Inc., a private start-up company that provides promotions and coupons for mobile phones.

        In addition, Mr. Off has significant experience with the telecommunications industry as a director of TDS since 1997. Mr. Off also has been a member of the TDS Audit Committee for over 10 years and a member of the TDS Compensation Committee for over 5 years.

        Mr. Off has a Bachelor of Science degree from the Colorado School of Mines.

        Mr. Off brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications in marketing and management as a result of his prior positions as a director and as chief executive officer and chairman of Checkpoint Systems and of Catalina Marketing. Because of the retail nature of the TDS businesses, the TDS board of directors believes that it is highly desirable to have directors with significant knowledge and experience in retail and marketing, as well as significant, high-level experience in managing retail businesses. In addition, Mr. Off has significant experience with respect to TDS and the telecommunications industry as a result of his many years as a director of TDS and as a member of the TDS Audit Committee and the TDS Compensation Committee.

        Mitchell H. Saranow.    Mitchell H. Saranow has been a director of TDS since 2004 and has served as a member of, and an "audit committee financial expert" on, TDS' Audit Committee since that time. He is also a member of the TDS Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The following provides information on the background of Mr. Saranow, including the specific factors that led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of TDS.

        Mr. Saranow is Chairman of The Saranow Group, L.L.C., a family-owned investment company he founded in 1984, through which Mr. Saranow founded or co-founded, developed and sold several successful ventures.

        Mr. Saranow was Chairman of the Board and co-Chief Executive Officer of Navigant Consulting, Inc. (NYSE: NCI), which provides consulting services to various industries on an international level, from November 1999 to June 2000.

16

        Prior thereto, he was Chairman and Managing General Partner of Fluid Management, L.P. for more than five years. Fluid Management was a privately-held specialized machinery manufacturer which was the world leader in designing, manufacturing and distributing dispensing and mixing equipment for the paint, coatings, ink and personal care industries.

        Within the last ten years, Mr. Saranow served as Chief Executive officer of two related privately-held Dutch companies which were sold under Dutch insolvency laws in 2008.

        Earlier in his career, he was an accountant, Chief Financial Officer of two large, privately-held food manufacturers, an investment banker specializing in financing the CATV industry, and an attorney with Mayer, Brown and Platt in Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Saranow is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive).

        Mr. Saranow was formerly a director of Lawson Products, Inc. (Nasdaq: LAWS), which distributes industrial maintenance and repair supplies, Navigant Consulting, Inc. (NYSE: NCI), which provides consulting services to various industries in North America, Europe and Asia, North American Scientific, Inc. (Nasdaq: NASM), which designs, develops, manufactures, and sells radioisotopic products for the treatment of cancer, and Telular Corp. (Nasdaq: WRLS), which designs, develops, manufactures and markets fixed cellular products. At Lawson Products, Mr. Saranow was a member and chairman of the nominating and corporate governance committee and the financial strategies committee and was a member of the audit committee and the compensation committee. Mr. Saranow also was a member of the audit committee of Navigant Consulting, a member and an "audit committee financial expert" of the audit committee of North American Scientific and a member and chairman of the audit committee of Telular Corp.

        Mr. Saranow has a JD/MBA degree from Harvard University.

        Mr. Saranow brings to the TDS board of directors substantial experience, expertise and qualifications as a result of his extensive background. Mr. Saranow is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and has been an accountant, lawyer, investment banker and a chief financial officer, chief executive officer and/or chairman at multiple companies. Mr. Saranow has founded or co-founded, developed and sold several successful ventures. He has significant experience with public companies and their boards of directors, having been a director of five public companies, including TDS. He has been a member of the audit committees of all five of such companies and was designated an audit committee financial expert by two of such companies, including TDS. In addition, Mr. Saranow brings to the board of directors experience and qualifications with respect to TDS and the telecommunications industry as a result of his earlier experience in the CATV industry and his service as a director of TDS and as its audit committee financial expert for over five years.

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" each of the above nominees for election by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares.

17


 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board of Directors

        The business and affairs of TDS are managed by or under the direction of the board of directors. The board of directors consists of twelve members. Holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares elect 25% of the directors rounded up plus one director, or a total of four directors based on a board size of twelve directors. Holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares elect the remaining eight directors. The TDS Voting Trust has approximately 94.6% of the voting power in the election of such eight directors and approximately 53.6% of the voting power in all other matters.

Board Leadership Structure

        Under the leadership structure selected for TDS, the same person does not serve as both the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Walter C.D. Carlson, who is not an employee or officer of TDS, serves as the non-executive Chairman of the Board and presides over meetings of the full board of directors. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., who is an officer and employee of TDS, serves as President and Chief Executive Officer and is responsible for day-to-day leadership and performance of TDS. This leadership structure is set forth in TDS' Bylaws. TDS has determined that this leadership structure is appropriate given the specific characteristics and circumstances of TDS. In particular, TDS considers it appropriate that the person who is the President and Chief Executive Officer of TDS also not serve as the Chairman of the Board in order to separate the executive who is primarily responsible for the performance of the company from the person who presides over board meetings at which performance of TDS is evaluated.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

        The following discloses the extent of the board of directors' role in the risk oversight of TDS, including how the board administers its oversight function, and the effect of the board's leadership structure discussed above on risk oversight.

        The TDS board of directors is primarily responsible for oversight of risk assessment and risk management of TDS. Although the TDS board of directors can delegate this responsibility to board committees, the TDS board has not done so, and continues to have full responsibility relating to risk oversight. Although the TDS board of directors has oversight responsibilities, the actual risk assessment and risk management is carried out by the President and Chief Executive Officer and other officers of TDS and reported to the board.

        TDS has established an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program, which applies to TDS and all of its business units. This program was designed with the assistance of an outside consultant and was integrated into TDS' existing management and strategic planning processes. The ERM program provides a common enterprise-wide language and discipline around risk identification, quantification and mitigation. The TDS board of directors currently receives periodic updates about the status and progress of this ERM program and takes action to the extent appropriate based on such updates.

        Although the TDS board of directors has ultimate oversight authority over risk and has not delegated such responsibility to any committees, certain TDS committees also have certain responsibilities relating to risk.

        Under NYSE listing standards, and as set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee is required to "discuss policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management." NYSE listing standards further provide that, "while it is the job of the CEO and senior management to assess and manage the listed company's exposure to risk, the audit committee must discuss guidelines and policies to govern the process by which this is handled. The audit committee should discuss the listed company's major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. The audit committee is not required to be the sole body responsible for risk assessment and management, but, as stated above, the committee must discuss guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken."

        Accordingly, pursuant to the foregoing requirements, the Audit Committee discusses TDS' major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures in connection with its review of financial statements and related matters on a quarterly basis.

18

        In addition, as part of the ERM program, the Audit Committee discusses guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and risk management are handled. The Audit Committee receives updates and discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management on a regular basis. The Audit Committee is not solely responsible for ERM, but the committee discusses guidelines and policies to govern the process by which ERM is undertaken.

        In addition, in connection with the functions of the Compensation Committee relating to the compensation of the executive officers of TDS (other than executive officers of U.S. Cellular), the Compensation Committee considers risks relating to compensation of executive officers of TDS, as discussed below in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. In addition, the Compensation Committee has responsibilities under its charter with respect to long-term compensation for all employees, as discussed below under "Risks from Compensation Policies and Practices".

        Also, the TDS Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may consider certain risks in connection with its responsibilities relating to corporate governance and director nominations, as described below.

        TDS believes that the leadership structure described above facilitates risk oversight because the role of the Chief Executive Officer, who has primary operating responsibility to assess and manage TDS' exposure to risk, is separated from the role of the Chairman of the Board, who sets the agenda for and presides over board of directors' meetings at which the TDS board exercises its oversight responsibility with respect to risk.

Director Independence and New York Stock Exchange Listing Standards

        TDS Common Shares and Special Common Shares are listed on the NYSE. Accordingly, TDS is subject to the listing standards applicable to companies that have equity securities listed on the NYSE.

        Under listing standards of the NYSE, TDS is a "controlled company" as such term is defined by the NYSE. TDS is a controlled company because over 50% of the voting power for the election of directors of TDS is held by the trustees of the TDS Voting Trust (i.e., the TDS Voting Trust has the voting power to elect eight of the twelve directors, or 66.7% of the directors). Accordingly, it is exempt from certain listing standards that require listed companies that are not controlled companies to (i) have a board composed of a majority of directors that qualify as independent under the rules of the NYSE, (ii) have a compensation committee composed entirely of directors that qualify as independent under the rules of the NYSE, and (iii) have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of directors that qualify as independent under the rules of the NYSE.

        As a controlled company, TDS is required to have at least three directors who qualify as independent to serve on the Audit Committee. The TDS Audit Committee has five members: George W. Off (chairperson), Clarence A. Davis, Donald C. Nebergall, Mitchell H. Saranow and Herbert S. Wander. Such directors must qualify as independent under the NYSE Listed Company Manual, including Section 303A.02(a) and Section 303A.02(b), and Section 303A.06, which incorporates the independence requirements of Section 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Section 10A-3"). Except as required by listing standards or SEC rule, TDS does not have any categorical standards of independence that must be satisfied.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, the TDS board of directors affirmatively determined that each member of the TDS Audit Committee has no material relationship with TDS or any other member of the TDS consolidated group ("TDS Consolidated Group"), either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with any member of the TDS Consolidated Group, and that each of such persons is independent (pursuant to Section 303A.02(a), Section 303A.02(b) and Section 10A-3) considering all relevant facts and circumstances, including commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships, if any.

        Such relevant facts and circumstances included the following: None of such persons is an employee or officer of TDS or any other member of the TDS Consolidated Group. None of such persons has any direct or indirect business relationships and/or fee arrangements with the TDS Consolidated Group and none of such persons receives any compensation from the TDS Consolidated Group except for his

19


services as a director and member of board committees of TDS. None of such persons has any other relationship or arrangement with the TDS Consolidated Group other than in his capacity as a director of TDS. Each of such persons qualifies as independent under each of the categorical standards in Section 303A.02(b) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Each of such persons qualifies as independent under Section 10A-3 because none of such persons receives any compensatory fee from any member of the TDS Consolidated Group and is not an "affiliated person" (as defined by the SEC) with respect to any member of the TDS Consolidated Group. None of such persons is an "immediate family member" (as defined by Section 303A.02(b)) of any person who is not independent under Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The only relationship and/or fee arrangement which such persons have with the TDS Consolidated Group are as directors and members of board committees of TDS. See also "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners And Management" below for information relating to beneficial share ownership and other relationships of Donald C. Nebergall.

        In addition, incumbent directors Christopher D. O'Leary and Gary L. Sugarman would qualify as independent directors under the listing standards of the NYSE. As a result, seven of the twelve incumbent directors, or over 58% of the directors, have been determined to qualify or would qualify as independent under the listing standards of the NYSE.

Meetings of Board of Directors

        The board of directors held seven meetings during 2010. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the board of directors (held during 2010 at which time such person was a director) and at least 75% of the total number of meetings held by each committee of the board on which such person served (during the period that such person served).

Corporate Governance Guidelines

        Under NYSE listing standards, TDS is required to adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines that address certain specified matters. TDS has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that address (i) board of directors structure, (ii) director qualification standards, (iii) director responsibilities, orientation and continuing education, (iv) director compensation and stock ownership, (v) board resources and access to management and independent advisors, (vi) annual performance evaluation of the Board, (vii) board committees, (viii) management succession and (ix) periodic review of the guidelines. A copy of such guidelines is available on TDS' website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

        Because TDS is a controlled company, it is not required under NYSE listing standards to have a corporate governance/nominating committee or, if it has one, that the corporate governance/nominating committee be composed entirely of independent directors. Although not required to do so under NYSE listing standards, TDS voluntarily has established a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are Walter C.D. Carlson (chairperson), LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. and Mitchell H. Saranow. Mr. Saranow qualifies as an independent director under NYSE listing standards. The primary function of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is to advise the board on corporate governance matters, including developing and recommending to the board the corporate governance guidelines for TDS. In addition, the charter of the committee provides that the committee will develop selection objectives and oversee the search for qualified individuals to serve on the board of directors and recommend to the board prospective nominees and the re-nomination of incumbent directors as it deems appropriate. A copy of the committee charter is available on TDS' website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—Board Committee Charters. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met three times in 2010.

Audit Committee

        The primary function of the Audit Committee is to (a) assist the board of directors of TDS in its oversight of (1) the integrity of TDS' financial statements, (2) TDS' compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent auditor's qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of TDS' internal audit function and independent auditors; (b) prepare an audit committee report as required

20


by the rules of the SEC to be included in TDS' annual Proxy Statement and (c) perform such other functions as set forth in the TDS Audit Committee charter, which shall be deemed to include the duties and responsibilities set forth in Section 10A-3. A copy of the Audit Committee charter is available on TDS' website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—Board Committee Charters.

        The Audit Committee is currently composed of five members who qualify as independent under NYSE listing standards, including Section 10A-3, as discussed above. The current members of the Audit Committee are George W. Off (chairperson), Clarence A. Davis, Donald C. Nebergall, Mitchell H. Saranow and Herbert S. Wander. The board of directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate and has "accounting or related financial management expertise" pursuant to listing standards of the NYSE.

        The board has made a determination that Mr. Saranow is an "audit committee financial expert" as such term is defined by the SEC.

        In accordance with the SEC's safe harbor rule for "audit committee financial experts," no member designated as an audit committee financial expert shall (i) be deemed an "expert" for any other purpose or (ii) have any duty, obligation or liability that is greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on a member of the board or the audit committee not so designated. Additionally, the designation of a member or members as an "audit committee financial expert" shall in no way affect the duties, obligations or liability of any member of the audit committee, or the board, not so designated.

        The Audit Committee held ten meetings during 2010.

Pre-Approval Procedures

        The Audit Committee adopted a policy in 2003, as last amended in May 2009, pursuant to which all audit and non-audit services must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The following describes the policy as amended. Under no circumstances may TDS' principal independent registered public accounting firm provide services that are prohibited by the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 or rules issued thereunder. Non-prohibited audit related services and certain tax and other services may be provided to TDS, subject to such pre-approval process and prohibitions. The Audit Committee has delegated to the chairperson together with one other member of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve services by the principal independent registered public accountant firm. In the event the chairperson is unavailable, pre-approval may be given by any two members of the Audit Committee. In addition to pre-approval of specific services, specified services have been pre-approved in detail up to specified dollar limits pursuant to the policy. All services are required to be reported to the full Audit Committee at each of its regularly scheduled meetings. The pre-approval policy relates to all services provided by TDS' principal independent registered public accounting firm.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

        The Audit Committee Charter provides that the Audit Committee has responsibilities with respect to related party transactions, as such term is defined by the rules of the NYSE. Related party transactions are addressed in Section 314.00 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.

        Section 314.00 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual states that "Related party transactions normally include transactions between officers, directors, and principal shareholders and the company." In general, "related party transactions" would include transactions required to be disclosed in TDS' Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K of the SEC. Pursuant to Item 404, TDS is required to disclose any transaction, which includes any financial transaction, arrangement, or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or a series of transactions, that has taken place since the beginning of TDS' last fiscal year or any currently proposed transaction in which: (1) TDS was or is to be a participant, (2) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (3) any "related person" had or will have a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction during any part of the fiscal year. For this purpose, in general, the term "related person" includes any director or executive officer of TDS, any nominee for director, any beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of TDS' voting securities and any "immediate family member" of such persons, within the meaning of Item 404.

21

        Section 314.00 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual provides that "Each related party transaction is to be reviewed and evaluated by an appropriate group within the listed company involved. While the Exchange does not specify who should review related party transactions, the Exchange believes that the Audit Committee or another comparable body might be considered as an appropriate forum for this task. Following the review, the company should determine whether or not a particular relationship serves the best interest of the company and its shareholders and whether the relationship should be continued or eliminated."

        Accordingly, pursuant to such provisions, the TDS Audit Committee has responsibilities over transactions that are deemed to be related-party transactions under Section 314.00 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Other than the foregoing, TDS has no policy relating to (i) the types of transactions that are covered by such policies and procedures; (ii) the standards to be applied pursuant to such policies and procedures; or (iii) the persons or groups of persons on the board of directors or otherwise who are responsible for applying such policies and procedures, and TDS does not maintain any other written document evidencing such policies and procedures.

        See Executive and Director Compensation—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation—Certain Relationships and Related Transactions for discussion of any related party transactions since the beginning of the last fiscal year.

Compensation Committee

        Although not required to do so under NYSE listing standards because it is a controlled company, TDS voluntarily has established a Compensation Committee comprised solely of directors that qualify as independent under the rules of the NYSE.

        Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC is required to direct the NYSE to adopt listing standards prohibiting the listing of any equity security of an issuer that does not comply with listing requirements with respect to the independence of members of the compensation committee of the board of directors of such issuer, except that this provision of the Dodd-Frank Act expressly provides that it does not apply to an issuer that is a controlled company. Although such listing standards have not yet been issued, when issued, they will not be applicable to TDS because it is a controlled company. Nevertheless, as indicated above, the Compensation Committee is comprised solely of directors that qualify as independent under the current listing standards of the NYSE.

        The primary functions of the Compensation Committee are to discharge the board of director's responsibilities relating to the compensation of the executive officers of TDS, other than executive officers of U.S. Cellular or any of its subsidiaries. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include the review of salary, bonus, long-term compensation and all other elements of compensation of such executive officers.

        For these purposes, "executive officers" means all officers that are employees who are or will be identified in TDS' annual Proxy Statement as "executive officers," including the President and CEO of TDS Telecom, except that the compensation of the President and CEO of U.S. Cellular is established and administered by U.S. Cellular's chairman and long-term incentive compensation committee, as described in the proxy statement of U.S. Cellular relating to its 2011 Annual Meeting of shareholders.

        The Compensation Committee is comprised of at least two non-employee members of TDS' board of directors, each of whom is an "outside director" within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and a "Non-Employee Director" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As noted above, such members also qualify as independent under the rules of the NYSE. During 2010, the members of the Compensation Committee included Herbert S. Wander (chairperson), George W. Off, Christopher D. O'Leary and Gary L. Sugarman. These persons do not have any compensation committee interlocks and are not related to any other directors.

        The Compensation Committee charter permits it to delegate some or all of the administration of the long-term incentive plans or programs to the President and Chief Executive Officer or other executive officers of TDS as the committee deems appropriate, to the extent permitted by law and the applicable long-term incentive plan or program, but not regarding any award to the President and CEO. However,

22


the Compensation Committee has not delegated any of its authority with respect to any of the officers identified in the below Summary Compensation Table.

        The Compensation Committee's charter provides that it will obtain advice and assistance from the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President of Human Resources and from any other officer or employee of TDS, as it determines is appropriate. TDS' Human Resources Department also supports the Compensation Committee in its work. As discussed below, the Compensation Committee also utilizes the services of an independent compensation consultant. See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below for information about compensation consultants, which information is incorporated by reference herein.

        The Compensation Committee does not approve director compensation. It is the view of the TDS board of directors that this should be the responsibility of the full board of directors. Only non-employee directors receive compensation in their capacity as directors and, as a result, the view of the TDS board of directors is that all directors should participate in such compensation decisions, rather than only some or all of the non-employee directors.

        A copy of the charter of the Compensation Committee is available on TDS' website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—Board Committee Charters.

        The Compensation Committee held five meetings during 2010. It also took actions by unanimous written consent.

Other Committee

        TDS has a Pricing Committee, consisting of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., as Chairman, and Kenneth R. Meyers, as a regular member. Walter C.D. Carlson is an alternate member of this committee. The Pricing Committee does not have a charter. Pursuant to resolutions of the TDS board of directors from time to time, the Pricing Committee is authorized to take certain actions with respect to financing and capital transactions of TDS, such as the issuance, redemption or repurchase of debt or the repurchase of shares of capital stock of TDS.

Director Nomination Process

        As discussed above, because TDS is a controlled company, it is not required under NYSE listing standards to have a corporate governance/nominating committee or, if it has one, that it be composed entirely of independent directors. Although not required to do so under NYSE listing standards, TDS voluntarily has established a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The charter of the committee provides that the committee will develop selection objectives and oversee the search for qualified individuals to serve on the board of directors and recommend to the board of directors prospective nominees and the re-nomination of incumbent directors as it deems appropriate. The committee does not nominate directors. It only recommends to the board of directors prospective nominees and the re-nomination of incumbent directors as it deems appropriate. The entire board of directors determines whether to nominate prospective nominees and re-nominate incumbent directors.

        TDS does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by shareholders. However, because the TDS Voting Trust has over 90% of the voting power in the election of directors elected by holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares, nominations of directors for election by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares is based on the recommendation of the trustees of the TDS Voting Trust. With respect to candidates for director to be elected by the holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and/or the TDS board may from time to time informally consider candidates submitted by shareholders that hold a significant number of Common Shares and/or Special Common Shares. Although TDS has no formal procedures to be followed by shareholders in submitting recommendations of candidates for director, shareholders that desire to nominate directors must follow the procedures set forth in TDS' Bylaws.

        Except to the extent provided in the next paragraph, TDS does not have any specific, minimum qualifications that the board believes must be met by a nominee for a position on the TDS board of directors, or any specific qualities or skills that the board believes are necessary for one or more of the

23


TDS directors to possess. The TDS board believes that substantial judgment, diligence and care are required to identify and select qualified persons as directors and does not believe that it would be appropriate to place limitations on its own discretion, except to the extent provided in the next paragraph. The TDS board has consistently sought to nominate to the board of directors eminently qualified individuals whom the board believes would provide substantial benefit and guidance to TDS.

        Considering the importance of Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") licenses to TDS, the TDS Bylaws include a qualification requirement providing that a candidate will not be eligible for election or continued service as a director unless he or she is eligible to serve as a director of a company that controls licenses granted by the FCC, as determined by the Corporation's Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee or the board of directors with the advice of counsel. In addition, another qualification requirement provides that candidate will not be eligible for election or continued service as a director if he or she is or becomes affiliated with, employed by or a representative of, or has or acquires a material personal involvement with, or material financial interest in, a Business Competitor (as defined in the Bylaws), as determined by the Corporation's Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee or the board of directors. Also, another qualification requirement provide that a candidate will not be eligible for election or continued service as a director if, as determined by the Corporation's Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee or the board of directors with the advice of counsel, (i) such candidate's election as a director would violate federal, state or foreign law or applicable stock exchange requirements (other than those related to independence) or (ii) such candidate has been convicted, including a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, of any felony, or of any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude.

        The TDS Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. However, as reflected in its Code of Business Conduct, TDS values diversity and does not discriminate on the basis of gender, age, race, color, sexual orientation, religion, ancestry, national origin, marital status, disability, military or veteran status or citizenship status. In considering whether to nominate individuals as director candidates, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee takes into account all facts and circumstances, including diversity. For this purpose, diversity broadly means a variety of backgrounds, experience, skills, education, attributes, perspectives and other differentiating characteristics. TDS believes that it is desirable for a board to have directors that can bring the benefit of diverse backgrounds, experience, skills and other characteristics to permit the board to have a variety of views and insights. Accordingly, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers how director candidates can contribute to board diversity as one of the many factors it considers in identifying nominees for director.

        Section 1.15 of the TDS bylaws provides that a person properly nominated by a shareholder for election as a TDS director shall not be eligible for election as a director unless he or she signs and returns to the Secretary of TDS, within fifteen days of a request therefor, written responses to any questions posed by the Secretary, that are intended to (i) determine whether such person may qualify as independent and would qualify to serve as a director of TDS under rules of the FCC, and (ii) obtain information that would be disclosed in a proxy statement with respect to such person as a nominee for election as a director and other material information about such person.

        Whether or not the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will recommend that the TDS board re-nominate, and the TDS board will re-nominate, existing directors for re-election depends on all facts and circumstances, including views on how the director has performed and is performing his or her duties. In the event of a vacancy on the board of a director elected by the Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares, nominations are based on the recommendation of the trustees of the TDS Voting Trust. In the event of a vacancy on the board of a director elected by the Common Shares and Special Common Shares, TDS may use various sources to identify potential candidates, including an executive search firm. In addition, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may consider recommendations by shareholders that hold a significant number of Common Shares and/or Special Common Shares. Potential candidates are initially screened by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and by other persons as the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee designates. Following this process, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider whether one or more candidates should be considered by the full board of directors. When appropriate, information about the candidate is presented to and discussed by the full board of directors.

24

        All of the nominees approved by the TDS board for inclusion on TDS' proxy card for election at the 2011 Annual Meeting are executive officers and/or directors who are standing for re-election and were recommended for re-nomination by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

        From time to time, TDS may pay a fee to an executive search firm to identify potential candidates for election as directors. TDS did not pay a fee in 2010 or 2011 to any third party or parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying or evaluating potential new nominees for election as directors at the 2011 Annual Meeting.

Non-Management Directors and Shareholder Communication with Directors

        As required by NYSE listing standards, the non-management directors of TDS meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. The TDS Chairman of the Board, Walter C.D. Carlson, a non-management director, presides at all meetings of the non-management directors. In addition, as required by NYSE listing standards, the independent directors of TDS meet at least once per year in an executive session without management or directors who are not independent.

        Shareholders or other interested parties may send communications to the TDS board of directors, to the Chairman of the Board, to the non-management directors or to specified individual directors of TDS at any time. Shareholders or other interested parties should direct their communication to such persons or group in care of the Secretary of TDS at its corporate headquarters, 30 N. LaSalle St., Suite 4000, Chicago IL 60602. Any shareholder communications that are addressed to the board of directors, the Chairman of the Board, the non-management directors or specified individual directors will be delivered by the Secretary of TDS to such persons or group.

        For more information, see the instructions on TDS' website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—Contacting the TDS Board of Directors.

TDS Policy on Attendance of Directors at Annual Meeting of Shareholders

        All directors are invited and encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting of shareholders, which is normally followed by the Annual Meeting of the board of directors. In general, all directors attend the Annual Meeting of shareholders unless they are unable to do so due to unavoidable commitments or intervening events. All except one of the persons serving as directors at the time attended the 2010 Annual Meeting of shareholders.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

        On March 10, 2011, the TDS board of directors amended its stock ownership guidelines for directors to provide that, within three years after the date on which a director first becomes a director, and thereafter for so long as each director remains a director of TDS, each such director is required to own Series A Common Shares, Common Shares and/or Special Common Shares of TDS having a combined value of at least three times the value of the annual stock award payable to non-employee directors under the Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, as it may be amended from time to time. The TDS board of directors will review this minimum ownership requirement periodically. The stock ownership guidelines are included in TDS' Corporate Governance Guidelines, which have been posted to TDS' website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Applicable to Directors

        As required by Section 303A.10 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, TDS has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Officers and Directors, as amended effective September 15, 2008. This code has been posted to TDS' internet website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Officers and Directors.

25


 EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        The following executive officers of TDS were identified in the above tables regarding the election of directors: LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., President of TDS; and Kenneth R. Meyers, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TDS. In addition to the executive officers identified in the tables regarding the election of directors, set forth below is a table identifying current officers of TDS and its subsidiaries who are executive officers of TDS under SEC rules. Unless otherwise indicated, the position held is an office of TDS. The age of the following persons is as of the date of this Proxy Statement.

Name   Age   Position
LeRoy T. Carlson     94   Chairman Emeritus
Mary N. Dillon     49   President and CEO of United States Cellular Corporation
David A. Wittwer     50   President and CEO of TDS Telecommunications Corporation
Douglas D. Shuma     50   Senior Vice President and Controller
Kurt B. Thaus     52   Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Scott H. Williamson     59   Senior Vice President—Acquisitions and Corporate Development
C. Theodore Herbert     75   Vice President—Human Resources
Joseph R. Hanley     44   Vice President—Technology Planning and Services

        LeRoy T. Carlson.    LeRoy T. Carlson has been Chairman Emeritus of TDS (an executive officer of TDS) for more than five years. He is a director of U.S. Cellular and is a director emeritus of TDS. Mr. Carlson is the father of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Walter C.D. Carlson, Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. and Prudence E. Carlson.

        Mary N. Dillon.    Mary N. Dillon was appointed the President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of U.S. Cellular effective June 1, 2010. Prior to that, Ms. Dillon had been employed as Executive Vice President and Global Chief Marketing Officer of McDonald's Corporation, a global restaurant company (NYSE: MCD), since October 2005. Prior to joining McDonald's, Ms. Dillon had been employed by PepsiCo Corporation, a global beverage company (NYSE: PEP), for approximately five years, most recently as President of its Quaker Foods Division from September 2004 to September 2005.

        David A. Wittwer.    David A. Wittwer has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of TDS Telecom since January 1, 2007. On February 21, 2006, TDS appointed Mr. Wittwer as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (COO) of TDS Telecom and designated him to succeed James Barr III as President and CEO of TDS Telecom on January 1, 2007. Prior to his appointment as Executive Vice President and COO of TDS Telecom, Mr. Wittwer was President of TDS Telecom's incumbent local exchange carrier operations since March 2005. Prior to that time, he was Executive Vice President—Staff Operations, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of TDS Telecom for more than five years.

        Douglas D. Shuma.    Douglas D. Shuma was appointed Senior Vice President and Controller of TDS on September 1, 2007. Prior to that time, Mr. Shuma was a consultant at Douglas Financial Consultants, a private accounting consulting company that he founded, since 2006. Before that time, he was the Vice President and Controller of Baxter International Inc., a global supplier of medical instruments and supplies (NYSE: BAX), for more than five years. Mr. Shuma is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive).

        Kurt B. Thaus.    Kurt B. Thaus was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer on January 12, 2004. Prior to that time, he was employed by T-Systems North America, Inc., a division of Deutsche Telekom, A.G., a global provider of telecommunications and information technology services (XETRA: DTE.DE), for more than five years, most recently as senior vice president of technology management services.

        Scott H. Williamson.    Scott H. Williamson has been Senior Vice President—Acquisitions and Corporate Development of TDS for more than five years.

        C. Theodore Herbert.    C. Theodore Herbert has been Vice President—Human Resources of TDS for more than five years.

26

        Joseph R. Hanley.    Joseph R. Hanley has been Vice President—Technology Planning and Services of TDS for more than five years.

        All of our executive officers devote all their employment time to the affairs of TDS and its subsidiaries.

Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics Applicable to Officers

        As required by Section 303A.10 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, TDS has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Officers and Directors, that also complies with the definition of a "code of ethics" as set forth in Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the SEC. The foregoing code has been posted to TDS' internet website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Officers and Directors.

        In addition, TDS has adopted a broad Code of Business Conduct that is applicable to all officers and employees of TDS and its subsidiaries. The foregoing code has been posted to TDS' internet website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—TDS Code of Business Conduct.

        TDS intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to any of the foregoing codes, by posting such information to TDS' internet website. Any waivers of any of the foregoing codes for directors or executive officers will be approved by TDS' board of directors or an authorized committee thereof, as applicable, and disclosed in a Form 8-K that is filed with the SEC within four business days of such waiver.

27


 PROPOSAL 2
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

What am I being asked to vote on in Proposal 2?

        In Proposal 2, we are requesting shareholders to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

How does the board of directors recommend that I vote on this proposal?

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR approval of the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as TDS' independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

        Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, who served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the last fiscal year, are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions raised by shareholders at the Annual Meeting or submitted in writing prior thereto.

        This proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on TDS' independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.

Is this vote binding on the board of directors?

        This vote is an advisory vote only, and therefore it will not bind TDS or our board of directors. We are not required to obtain shareholder ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm by our Bylaws or otherwise. However, we have elected to seek such ratification by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes which could be cast by shares entitled to vote with respect to such matter at the Annual Meeting. Should the shareholders fail to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee will review whether to retain such firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the approval of Proposal 2.

28


FEES PAID TO PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS

        The following sets forth the aggregate fees (including expenses) billed by TDS' principal accountants PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 2010 and 2009 (as updated from amounts reported in the 2010 Proxy Statement):

 
   2010   2009  

Audit Fees (1)

   $ 3,857,302   $ 3,466,476  

Audit Related Fees (2)

     292,032     260,579  

Tax Fees (3)

     —     101,161  

All Other Fees (4)

     8,130     17,130  
           

Total Fees

   $ 4,157,464   $ 3,845,346  
           
(1)
Represents the aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services rendered for the audit of the annual financial statements for the years 2010 and 2009 included in TDS' and U.S. Cellular's Forms 10-K for those years and the reviews of the financial statements included in TDS' and U.S. Cellular's Forms 10-Q for those years, including the attestation and report relating to internal control over financial reporting. Also includes fees for services that are normally incurred in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, consents, and review of documents filed with the SEC.

(2)
Represents the aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of TDS' and U.S. Cellular's financial statements that are not reported under Audit Fees. In 2010 and 2009, the amount represents fees billed for audits of subsidiaries.

(3)
Represents the aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 2010 and 2009 for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. In 2009, this represented fees for a review of state and franchise tax returns.

(4)
Represents the aggregate fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services, other than services covered above. In both 2010 and 2009, this amount includes the fee for access to a virtual accounting research service and in 2009 includes a fee for training.

        See "Corporate Governance—Audit Committee—Pre-Approval Procedures" above for a description of the Audit Committee's pre-approval policies and procedures with respect to TDS' independent registered public accounting firm.

29


 AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

        This report is submitted by the current members of the Audit Committee of the board of directors of TDS. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the TDS board of directors, a copy of which is available on TDS' website, www.teldta.com, under Corporate Governance—Board Committee Charters.

        Management is responsible for TDS' internal controls and the financial reporting process. TDS has an internal audit staff, which performs testing of internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of TDS' consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.

        In this context, the Audit Committee held meetings with management, the internal audit staff and representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, TDS' independent registered public accounting firm for 2010. In these meetings, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Management represented to the Audit Committee that TDS' consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

        The discussions with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP also included the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standard, Vol. 1. AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T, relating to information regarding the scope and results of the audit. The Audit Committee also received from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP written disclosures and a letter regarding its independence as required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and this information was discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

        Based on, and in reliance upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 be included in TDS' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

        By the members of the Audit Committee of the board of directors of TDS:

George W. Off
Chairperson

   Clarence A. Davis   Donald C. Nebergall   Mitchell H. Saranow   Herbert S. Wander

30


 PROPOSAL 3
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

What am I being asked to vote on in Proposal 3?

        In Proposal 3, we are providing shareholders with a vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to compensation disclosure rules set forth in Item 402 of Regulation S-K of the SEC (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure). This vote is required to be submitted to shareholders beginning in 2011 pursuant to SEC rules adopted under recently enacted provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act codified in Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The advisory vote on executive compensation described in this proposal is commonly referred to as a "Say-on-Pay" vote.

How does the board of directors recommend that I vote on this proposal?

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR approval of the Say-on-Pay proposal.

        TDS believes that its executive compensation program is reasonable, competitive and strongly focused on pay for performance.

        TDS' compensation objectives for executive officers are to support the overall business strategy and objectives, attract and retain high-quality management, link compensation to both individual and company performance, and provide compensation that is both competitive and consistent with our financial performance.

        Consistent with these goals and as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee has developed and approved an executive compensation philosophy to provide a framework for TDS' executive compensation program featuring the policies and practices described in the Executive Summary of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis below.

        This proposal gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement.

Is this vote binding on the board of directors?

        The Say-on-Pay vote is an advisory vote only, and therefore will not bind TDS or our board of directors. However, the board of directors and the Compensation Committee will consider the voting results as appropriate when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

        The results of the Say-on-Pay vote will be disclosed on a Form 8-K.

        The next Say-on-Pay vote will occur at the 2012 Annual Meeting of shareholders.

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR approval of Proposal 3.

31


PROPOSAL 4
ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF SAY-ON-PAY VOTES

What am I being asked to vote on in Proposal 4?

        In Proposal 4, we are asking shareholders to vote, on an advisory basis, as to whether future Say-on-Pay votes should be held every year, every two years or every three years. This vote is required to be submitted to shareholders beginning in 2011 pursuant to SEC rules adopted under recently enacted provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act codified in Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. TDS' policy is to provide shareholders with a Say-on-Pay vote EVERY YEAR. The advisory vote on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes described in this proposal is commonly referred to as a "Say-on-Frequency" vote.

How does the board of directors recommend that I vote on this proposal?

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR holding a Say-on-Pay vote EVERY YEAR.

        After careful consideration of this proposal, our board of directors has determined that TDS should hold a Say-on-Pay vote every year for a number of reasons, including the following:

        Shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the board of director's recommendation. Instead, the proxy card provides shareholders with four choices with respect to this proposal: every year, every two years, every three years or shareholders may abstain from voting on the proposal.

Is this vote binding on the board of directors?

        This vote is an advisory vote only, and therefore it will not bind TDS or our board of directors. However, the board of directors and the Compensation Committee will consider the voting results as appropriate when considering TDS' policy on the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes. The option of every year, every two years or every three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders will be considered by the board of directors and the Compensation Committee as the shareholders' recommendation as to the frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes. Nevertheless, the board of directors and the Compensation Committee may decide that TDS' policy should be to hold Say-on-Pay votes more or less frequently than the option that receives the most votes from shareholders. As required by SEC rules, TDS will disclose on a Form 8-K its decision in light of such vote as to how frequently TDS will include a shareholder vote on the compensation of executives in its proxy materials until the next Say-on-Frequency vote.

        TDS is required to request shareholders to vote on a Say-on-Frequency proposal at least once every six years. Accordingly, TDS intends to next submit a Say-on-Frequency proposal to shareholders at the 2017 Annual Meeting of shareholders.

        The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote for holding a Say-on-Pay vote EVERY YEAR with respect to Proposal 4.

32


 EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

        The following discussion and analysis of our compensation practices and related compensation information should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation Table and other tables included below, as well as our financial statements and management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.


Compensation Discussion And Analysis

        This Compensation Discussion and Analysis discusses the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table.

Executive Summary

        TDS provides wireless, Internet, telephone and broadband communications services to more than 7 million customers in 36 states through its primary business units, U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom. U.S. Cellular accounted for 84% of TDS' revenues in 2010, and TDS Telecom accounted for 16%.

        TDS and its business units operate in the highly competitive telecommunications industry. As the companies continue to position themselves to compete aggressively for customers, TDS has placed greater emphasis on company performance in the executive bonus structure, as follows:

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

        TDS and its business units are committed to providing the very best in customer satisfaction, achieving long-term profitable growth, and building the high-quality teams required to make this possible. As such, we focus on operating in a fiscally responsible manner, and on recruiting and retaining talented employees who believe in the company's values and long-term perspective.

        TDS' compensation objectives for executive officers are to support the overall business strategy and objectives, attract and retain high-quality management, link compensation to both individual and company performance, and provide compensation that is both competitive and consistent with our financial performance.

Highlights of the TDS Compensation Programs:

33

2010 Compensation

Our executive officers' compensation is comprised of a mix of base salary, annual cash bonuses and equity-based, long-term incentive awards.

Say-on-Pay Vote

        As indicated above, TDS has included a Say-on-Pay vote in this Proxy Statement and expects to do this on an annual basis. TDS will consider the results of this annual vote in determining its compensation policies and decisions. Beginning in the 2012 Proxy Statement, this Compensation Discussion and Analysis will include a discussion of how TDS considered the results of the most recent Say-on-Pay vote in determining compensation policies and decisions and how that consideration affected TDS' executive compensation decisions and policies.

Overview

        TDS' compensation policies for executive officers are intended to provide incentives for the achievement of corporate and individual performance goals and to provide compensation consistent with the financial performance of TDS. TDS' policies establish incentive compensation performance goals for executive officers based on factors over which such officers have control and which are important to

34


TDS' long-term success. TDS believes compensation should be related to the financial performance of TDS and should be sufficient to enable TDS to attract and retain individuals possessing the talents required for long-term successful performance. Nevertheless, although performance influences compensation and awards, all elements of compensation are discretionary and officers do not become entitled to any compensation or awards solely as a result of the achievement of performance levels.

        The responsibilities of the TDS Compensation Committee include the review of salary, bonus, long-term compensation and all other elements of compensation of executive officers of TDS, other than officers of U.S. Cellular or any of its subsidiaries. For these purposes, "executive officers" means all officers that are employees who are or will be identified in TDS' Proxy Statement as "executive officers," including the President and CEO of TDS Telecom, except that the compensation of the President and CEO of U.S. Cellular is established and administered by U.S. Cellular's chairman and long-term incentive compensation committee, as described in the proxy statement of U.S. Cellular relating to its 2011 Annual Meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, except as expressly indicated below, the following discussion does not apply to Mary N. Dillon, the President and CEO of U.S. Cellular. Also, Ms. Dillon does not receive any awards with respect to TDS shares; all her awards made by the U.S. Cellular long-term incentive compensation committee are with respect to Common Shares of U.S. Cellular (NYSE: USM).

        The Compensation Committee's charter provides that it will obtain advice and assistance from the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President of Human Resources and from any other officer or employee of TDS, as it determines is appropriate. As discussed below, the Compensation Committee also utilizes the services of both an independent compensation consultant and TDS' compensation consultant.

        The Compensation Committee has not delegated any of its authority with respect to any of the officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table. The Compensation Committee's charter, however, permits it to delegate some or all of the administration of the long-term incentive plans or programs to the President and Chief Executive Officer or other executive officer of TDS as the Committee deems appropriate, to the extent permitted by law and the applicable long-term incentive plan or program, but not regarding any award to the President and CEO.

Objectives and Reward Structure of TDS' Compensation Programs

        The above Overview generally describes the objectives and reward structure of TDS' compensation programs. This section further discusses, with respect to the officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, (1) the objectives of TDS' compensation programs and (2) what the compensation programs are designed to reward.

        The objectives of TDS' compensation programs for executive officers, and their relationship to the reward structure, are to:

        The primary financial focus of TDS as a consolidated enterprise is the increase of long-term shareholder value through growth, measured primarily in such terms as return on capital, revenues, customer units in service, operating cash flow (operating income plus depreciation, amortization and accretion) and operating income. Operating units of TDS may have somewhat different primary financial measures. However, there is no strict relationship between elements of compensation or total compensation and such measures of performance. Instead, compensation decisions are made subjectively by the Compensation Committee, considering certain performance measures, as well as all other appropriate facts and circumstances. TDS' compensation policies for executive officers are designed to reward the achievement of such corporate performance goals.

35

        Each element of compensation and the total compensation of the named executive officers are determined on the basis of the committee's analysis of multiple factors rather than specific measures of performance. The Compensation Committee does not rely on predetermined formulas or a limited set of criteria when it evaluates the performance of the named executive officers.

        TDS' compensation programs are designed to reward performance of TDS on both a short-term and long-term basis. With respect to the officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, the design of compensation programs and performance rewarded is similar but with some differences for each of the named executive officers depending on such officer's position and responsibilities.

        The Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the President and CEO of TDS in light of the annual and ongoing objectives for TDS and for its primary business units and the attainment of those objectives, and sets the elements of compensation for the President and CEO based on such performance evaluation and compensation principles, as discussed below.

        With respect to the other officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, the Compensation Committee reviews management's evaluation of the performance of such executive officers and determines and approves the elements of compensation for such executive officers based on such performance evaluations and compensation principles and the Compensation Committee's own assessment on the performance of these officers, as discussed below.

Elements of Compensation

        This section discusses, with respect to the officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, (i) each element of compensation paid to such officers, (ii) why TDS chooses to pay each element of compensation, (iii) how TDS determines the amount or formula for each element of pay, and (iv) how each compensation element and TDS' decisions regarding that element fit into TDS' overall compensation objectives and affect decisions regarding other elements.

        Each element of compensation paid to officers is as follows:

36

        TDS has chosen to pay or provide these elements of compensation after considering common compensation practices of peers and other companies with similar characteristics, in order to support TDS' overall business strategy and objectives. TDS recognizes that it must compensate its executive officers in a competitive manner comparable to similar companies in order to attract and retain high quality management, attain or exceed business objectives and targeted financial performance and increase shareholder value. Executive compensation is intended to provide, in the judgment of the Compensation Committee, an appropriate balance between the long-term and short-term performance of TDS, and also a balance between TDS' financial performance and shareholder return.

        TDS does not have defined guidelines that determine the amount or formula for each element of pay. TDS also does not have defined guidelines that determine how each compensation element and decisions regarding that element fit into TDS' overall compensation objectives and affect decisions regarding other elements. TDS has no target levels for cash versus equity compensation. Instead, TDS establishes elements of compensation and determines how they fit together overall and in the manner described in the following discussion.

        As noted above, the elements of executive compensation consist of both annual cash and long-term equity compensation. Annual cash compensation consists of base salary and an annual bonus. Annual compensation decisions are based partly on individual and corporate short-term performance and partly on the individual and corporate cumulative long-term performance during the executive's tenure in his or her position, particularly with regard to the President and CEO. Long-term equity compensation is intended to compensate executives primarily for their contributions to long-term increases in shareholder value and is generally provided through the grant of stock options and restricted stock units.

        The Compensation Committee determines annually each executive officer's base salary, taking into consideration: (1) the appropriate salary range for the executive officer's position and responsibilities, (2) his or her performance during the preceding year, (3) his or her performance during the executive's tenure in the position, (4) TDS' and its business units' performance during the year compared to plan and compared with that of similar companies, (5) the recommendation of the President and CEO (with respect to executive officers other than the President and CEO and (6) such other factors and circumstances as the committee may deem relevant. The Compensation Committee makes such determination considering the matters described below, including advice and information from its independent compensation consultant, Compensation Strategies, Inc. See Compensation Consultant below for information about Compensation Strategies.

        In addition, the Compensation Committee determines annually the executive officer's bonus, taking into consideration: (1) the executive officer's performance during the preceding year, including contributions to TDS and its business units, and achievement of individual objectives, (2) TDS' and its business units' performance during the year compared to plan and compared with that of similar companies, (3) the achievement of important corporate and business unit objectives for the year, (4) the recommendation of the President and CEO (with respect to executive officers other than the President and CEO and (5) such other factors and circumstances as the committee may deem relevant.

        In general, other facts and circumstances that the Compensation Committee considers in determining the annual cash compensation of the named executive officers and/or that the President and CEO considers in his evaluation and recommendation to the Compensation Committee with respect to the named executive officers, other than the President and CEO, include the following: the fact that TDS is a public company; the publicly-available benchmark information of cash compensation of TDS' publicly-held peers and other publicly-held companies, as discussed below; the fact that TDS is primarily a regional competitor and that some of its competitors are national or global telecommunications companies that are much larger than TDS and possess greater resources than TDS; the fact that TDS is a controlled company; and the fact that the primary financial focus of TDS as a consolidated enterprise is the increase of long-term shareholder value through growth. Additional facts and circumstances considered with respect to the named executive officers are discussed below in the discussion relating to each such officer.

        The Compensation Committee also determines long-term equity compensation awards to the identified executive officers under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which include options,

37


restricted stock units and bonus match units, as discussed below. Grants of options, restricted stock units and bonus match units by TDS to the President and CEO and the other executive officers are generally made to all such officers at the same time in a particular year. In 2010, options and restricted stock units were granted on May 25, 2010. Bonus match units were granted on March 1, 2010 (the date that the related bonus was determined). TDS may also make grants of equity awards during other times of the year as it deems appropriate. All option, restricted stock unit and bonus match unit awards are expensed over the applicable vesting periods.

        TDS does not backdate options or have any program, plan or practice to time the grant of awards in coordination with the release of material non-public information.

        The Compensation Committee does not consider an officer's outstanding equity awards or stock ownership levels when determining the value of the long-term incentive award component of such officer's compensation. The Compensation Committee makes long-term incentive awards based on performance for a particular year and other considerations as described herein and does not consider outstanding equity awards and stock ownership to be relevant in connection therewith.

Risks Relating to Compensation to Executive Officers

        TDS does not believe that the incentives in compensation arrangements maintained by TDS encourage executive officers to take unnecessary, excessive or inappropriate risks that could threaten the value of TDS, or that risks arising from TDS' compensation policies and practices for executive officers are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS, as explained below. The following describes the process undertaken to reach the conclusion, and the basis for the conclusion, that TDS' compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS.

        In 2010 and 2011, representatives of TDS took the following steps: Various elements of compensation (including plans and arrangements) provided to executive officers, non-executive officers and all other employees were identified and cataloged. The potential risks associated with each element of compensation were identified and evaluated for materiality and likelihood. Controls and potential mitigating factors were then identified and evaluated. Based on this process, documentation was prepared which maps and identifies TDS' various compensation elements, describes their characteristics and purposes, identifies potential risks associated with each compensation element, and then describes controls and mitigating factors. This documentation was used to evaluate the potential risks of the various elements of compensation, which are summarized below.

        In addition, TDS considered the following processes and matters. TDS has internal controls in place and has processes to identify deficiencies, including significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. These processes have not identified any compensation policies or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS. TDS also has an Enterprise Risk Management process that has not identified any compensation policies or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS. In addition, in connection with its process to review and identify risks for its Annual Report on Form 10-K, TDS did not identify any compensation policies or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS. Furthermore, TDS has not had any incident in which TDS' compensation policies and practices have resulted in a material adverse effect on TDS. Although TDS' compensation policies and practices have evolved over time, their risk characteristics have not changed in any material respect for several years. TDS does not believe that its compensation policies and practices are unusual in any significant respect and believes that they are comparable in many respects with those of many other commercial public companies. TDS' compensation policies and practices have been developed over time with the assistance of its nationally-recognized compensation consultant, Tower Watson. Such policies and practices also have been reviewed by the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, Compensation Strategies.

        TDS' compensation policies for executive officers are intended to provide incentives for the achievement of corporate and individual performance goals and to provide compensation consistent with the financial performance of TDS. TDS' policies establish incentive compensation performance goals for executive officers based on factors over which such officers have substantial control and which are important to TDS' long-term success. TDS believes that the elements of compensation are appropriately

38


balanced between short and long-term compensation in a way that does not encourage excessive risk taking. In particular, all executives receive a competitive base salary that is paid regardless of performance and a significant portion of compensation is long-term incentive compensation, which discourages short-term risk taking.

        Although executive officers also receive an annual bonus (including, in the case of certain executive officers, bonus amounts that are reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the Summary Compensation Table as required under SEC rules—see discussion under "Annual Cash Compensation—Summary of Bonus Payments" below), only part of the annual bonus is based on company performance—the rest is based on individual performance and discretion. Further, even with respect to company performance, TDS does not have incentive plans pursuant to which executive officers become entitled to compensation as a result of the achievement of a certain level of performance regardless of the risk undertaken. All incentive compensation is discretionary and, as a result, could be reduced or not awarded if an executive officer caused TDS to undertake unauthorized risk. Further, TDS believes that its controls and monitoring do not provide officers with substantial discretion that would permit them to undertake unauthorized risk.

        Also, long-term equity compensation includes restricted stock units that retain value even if stock prices decline. As a result, as long as the stock continues to have some value, such awards will not expire without value and, as a result, do not encourage risk taking to attempt to avoid having awards expire without value, as could occur with stock options. Although executive officers also receive stock options, multi-year vesting and an exercise period that is generally ten years reduces the potential for excessive risk taking and, in any event, options are only one of several elements of compensation.

        Also, depending on the facts and circumstances, TDS may seek to adjust or recover awards or payments if the relevant performance measures upon which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of an award or payment.

        As a telecommunications company, TDS faces general business risks similar to many other businesses and certain other risks specific to a telecommunications business (as disclosed in TDS' most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K). TDS has an authorization policy that requires various levels of approvals for executive officers to take action depending on the dollar amount involved, and internal controls, procedures and processes to monitor and review such actions. Under such policy, executive officers have dollar limits with respect to the matters that they unilaterally can approve. Actions involving amounts over such limits would need to be approved by the board of directors and/or more than one executive officer of TDS.

        As a result, considering the foregoing processes and considerations, TDS does not believe that its compensation policies and practices for executive officers provide incentives to such employees to undertake risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS. Also, as discussed below under "Risks from Compensation Policies and Practices", TDS does not believe that risks arising from TDS' compensation policies and practices for its employees, including non-executive officers, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS.

Compensation Consultant

        Towers Watson is TDS management's primary compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee also obtained the advice of this consultant as described below.

        In 2010, the role of such compensation consultant in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive officer compensation was to provide external benchmarking data to TDS from its executive compensation survey database and to provide recommendations on the type and amount of compensation to be granted to officers.

        The nature and scope of the assignment, and the material elements of the instructions or directions given to such consultant with respect to the performance of its duties under its engagement, were to make recommendations based on external benchmarking data obtained from its executive compensation survey database. See "Benchmarking" below.

39

        In addition, the Compensation Committee's charter provides that the committee shall have the authority to engage advisors as it deems necessary to carry out its duties and that TDS shall provide appropriate funding, as determined by the Compensation Committee, for payment of any advisor retained by the committee, as well as ordinary administrative expenses of the committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties. Pursuant to such authority, the Compensation Committee retained and obtained the advice of Compensation Strategies, Inc., a provider of executive compensation consulting services, since 2008. Compensation Strategies is independent and does not have any other relationships with TDS or its affiliates.

        The role of Compensation Strategies in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive officer compensation, the nature and scope of the assignment, and the material elements of the instructions or directions given to such consultant with respect to the performance of its duties under its engagement, are to review TDS' various compensation elements and programs and to provide independent analysis and advice to the Compensation Committee for the purpose of evaluating such elements and programs. As discussed below under "Benchmarking", such compensation consultant conducted a competitive review of compensation levels of TDS executive officers in 2010 as a cross-check to the information provided by Towers Watson.

        Other than to provide to the Compensation Committee the foregoing advice or recommendations on the amount or form of executive compensation, neither Compensation Strategies nor its affiliates provided any additional services to TDS or its affiliates or to the Compensation Committee in 2010.

        Neither Towers Watson nor Compensation Strategies provides any advice as to director compensation.

Benchmarking

        TDS engages in benchmarking as described below.

        For executive compensation purposes, market benchmark data is obtained from the Towers Watson Executive Compensation Database. For compensation decisions in 2010, data was obtained from the 2009 database. The database contained over 750 companies that represented a diverse range of companies across all industries, including companies from the telecommunications, retail, financial, electronics, pharmaceutical, manufacturing and consumer products sectors. The data was developed using regression analysis based on annual revenues approximating TDS' revenues. When regression data was not available, tabular data from the database was used, and approximately scoped to reflect TDS revenues. This database was used to benchmark the ranges of annual cash compensation considered to be appropriate for the named executive officers, as discussed below. This database also was used to benchmark the equity compensation awards of the named executive officers, as discussed below. TDS believes this approach provides a reasonably accurate reflection of the competitive market for such elements of compensation necessary to retain current executives and attract future executives to positions at TDS. In addition, TDS believes this methodology is more statistically valid than solely benchmarking these elements of compensation to the limited number of companies in the peer group used for the Stock Performance Graph for the applicable performance year.

        The identities of the individual component companies that are included in the Towers Watson database are neither disclosed to nor considered by TDS or the Compensation Committee. TDS and the Compensation Committee rely upon and consider to be material only the aggregated survey data prepared by Towers Watson. They do not obtain or consider information on the identities of the individual companies included in the survey in connection with any compensation decisions because this information is not considered to be material. Instead, TDS and the Compensation Committee rely on Towers Watson for such purposes.

        In 2010, the Compensation Committee also obtained peer group information from its independent compensation consultant, Compensation Strategies. In particular, in 2010, Compensation Strategies provided market data for a peer group for purposes of a competitive review of compensation levels of TDS' executive officers. This was done as a cross-check against the compensation that was approved based on the above information provided by Towers Watson.

40

        For this cross-check, Compensation Strategies created an industry peer group that consisted of 14 publicly-traded companies of somewhat similar size to TDS from the telecommunications industry. The companies in this group were: CenturyLink, Cincinnati Bell, Frontier Communications, Global Crossing, IDT Corp., Leap Wireless International, Level 3 Communications, MetroPCS Communications, NII Holdings, Primus Telecommunication Group, Qwest Communications International, tw telecom, Windstream, and XO Holdings.

        TDS also generally considers compensation arrangements at the companies in the peer group index included in the "Stock Performance Graph" that is included in the TDS annual report to shareholders, as discussed below, as well as other companies in the telecommunications industry and other industries, to the extent considered appropriate, based on similar size, function, geography or otherwise. This information is used to generally understand the market for compensation arrangements for executives, but is not used for benchmarking purposes.

        TDS selected the Dow Jones U.S. Telecommunications Index, a published industry index, as its peer group for the Stock Performance Graph. As of December 31, 2009, the Dow Jones U.S. Telecommunications Index was composed of the following companies: AT&T, CenturyLink, Cincinnati Bell, Frontier Communications, Leap Wireless International, Leucadia National, Level 3 Communications, MetroPCS Communications, NII Holdings, Qwest Communications International, Sprint Nextel, Telephone and Data Systems (TDS and TDS.S), tw telecom (Class A), U.S. Cellular, Verizon Communications, Virgin Media and Windstream. As of December 31, 2010, Dow Jones added the following companies to this index: AboveNet Inc., American Tower Corp. (Class A), Crown Castle Communications Corp. and SBA Communications Corp.

Company Performance

        Each year, TDS calculates an overall percentage of TDS performance based on the performance of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom. The following shows TDS' level of achievement with respect to 2010.

        Overall TDS adjusted performance for 2010 was 77.5% of target. This represents the average of the adjusted U.S. Cellular percentage of 70% and the adjusted TDS Telecom percentage of 100%, as weighted by a specified percentage intended to represent the approximate proportion of TDS that U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom represent, calculated as follows:

Business Unit
  2010 Bonus Program
Performance as a
Percent of Target
Performance 		  Adjusted
Performance 		  Allocated
Proportion of
Total
Company 		  Unadjusted
Weighted
Performance 		  Adjusted
Weighted
Performance 		 
 
   (a)
   (b)
   (c)
   (a)×(c)
   (b)×(c)
  
U.S. Cellular     61.1%       70%     75%     45.8%       52.5%  
TDS Telecom     90.5%     100%     25%     22.6%       25.0%  
Weighted Average Company Performance
as a Percentage of Target 		                      68.5%*     77.5%
 		 
*
Does not add due to rounding

        Performance of U.S. Cellular is discussed in the U.S. Cellular proxy statement. As noted therein, the overall average percentage achieved with respect to 2010 performance for purposes of the U.S. Cellular bonus pool was calculated to be 61.1%. Nevertheless, the entire amount of the bonus pool is discretionary and subject to approval by the Chairman of U.S. Cellular, who is also the President and CEO of TDS. Pursuant to this discretionary authority, the Chairman of U.S. Cellular adjusted the overall bonus pool to 70% of target. This was done due to the accomplishments of U.S. Cellular in 2010 despite the continuing weak economy and a continuing challenging and competitive industry, including other achievements by U.S. Cellular in 2010 that were not measured by the U.S. Cellular executive bonus plan, and to adjust for certain changes in facts and circumstances that were not anticipated when the targets were established.

41

        The following provides information on performance metrics and achievement of TDS Telecom with respect to 2010 that was considered in evaluating the bonus paid in 2011. These are the criteria that the President and CEO and the Compensation Committee of TDS believe should be used for evaluating performance with respect to 2010 because such criteria reflect TDS Telecom's business goals. Financial information presented in the below table is based on the performance metrics established specifically for bonus purposes and may not agree with the segment financial information for TDS Telecom reported in TDS' 2010 Form 10-K, which is based on GAAP, or with other publicly disclosed information.

        The below table shows that the overall percentage achievement of the performance metrics was 90.5% with respect to 2010 for TDS Telecom. Nevertheless, the entire amount of the bonus pool is discretionary and subject to approval by the Chairman of TDS Telecom, who is also the President and CEO of TDS. Pursuant to this discretionary authority, the Chairman of TDS Telecom adjusted the overall bonus pool to 100% of target. This was done because 2010 was a very strong year of performance for TDS Telecom beyond the below-referenced performance measures. In addition, TDS Telecom (i) was instrumental in pursuing the successful acquisitions of two Hosted and Managed Services companies; (ii) won economic stimulus funds of over $100 million; (iii) maintained TDS Telecom's share of the broadband wired connections in its ILEC markets in the face of intense competition; (iv) kept tight control of costs; and (v) made strong progress in developing viable strategies and in strengthening TDS Telecom's strategic thinking to be even more successful in the years ahead.

Measurement
  Actual
2010
Results 		  2010
Target 		  Actual
Results
as a % of
Target 		  Minimum
Threshold
Performance
(as a % of
Target) 		  Maximum
Performance
(as a % of
Target) 		  Target
Points 		  Actual
Points
Earned 		  %
Achieved 		 

GROWTH

                                                  

Consumer Weighted RGUs (Revenue Generating Units)

     255,017     276,722     92 %   80 %   120 %   140     107     76 %

Commercial Weighted RGUs

     72,595     104,589     69 %   70 %   130 %   140     —     — %

Revenue per Account

   $ 129.97   $ 129.41     100 %   90 %   110 %   140     146     104 %

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

                                                  

Consumer Weighted Churn*

     1.52 %   1.53 %   99 %   110 %   90 %   90     95     106 %

Commercial Weighted Churn*

     1.13 %   1.31 %   86 %   120 %   80 %   90     154     171 %

PRODUCTIVITY

                                                  

Cost to Provide Service per Weighted RGU*

   $ 23.74   $ 23.18     102 %   110 %   90 %   100     86     86 %

General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses as a % of Revenue*

     9.3 %   9.3 %   100 %   110 %   90 %   100     100     100 %

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

                                                  

Return on Capital (ROC)

     4.55 %   4.47 %   102 %   80 %   120 %   200     217     109 %
                                             

                                  1000     905     90.5 %
                                             
*
Lower actual amount is better.

        If a metric does not meet the minimum threshold performance level, no target points are awarded with respect to such metric. If maximum performance or greater is achieved, 200% of the target points are awarded. As shown above, the minimum threshold was achieved with respect to all except one of the metrics, but was less than maximum performance in each case. As a result, the target points were prorated based on the formula included in the TDS Telecom bonus plan.

        A total of 905 actual versus 1,000 target points was achieved and, as a result, the overall percentage achieved was 90.5%. However, as noted above, pursuant to his discretionary authority, the Chairman of TDS Telecom adjusted the overall bonus pool to 100% of target.

Personal Objectives and Performance

        In addition to TDS and/or business unit performance, the Compensation Committee may consider personal objectives and performance. The personal objectives and performance that the Compensation Committee considered in its evaluation of the President and CEO are discussed below. The personal

42


objectives and performance that the President and CEO considered in his evaluation to the Compensation Committee of the named executive officers other than himself are also discussed below. There was no minimum level of achievement of any of those objectives that was required for any cash compensation decision. The assessment of the achievement of such objectives is not formulaic, objective or quantifiable. Instead, the individual performance considerations are factors, among others, that are taken into account in the course of making subjective judgments in connection with compensation decisions.

Annual Cash Compensation

        Annual cash compensation decisions, consisting of base salary for the current year and bonus based on performance, are generally made concurrently by the Compensation Committee each year for each of the identified executive officers.

        As part of the process of determining the appropriate elements of annual cash compensation for the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee is provided with information about the compensation of similar executive officers at other companies, including chief executive officers of companies, chief executive officers and chief operating officers of their principal business units, if available, chief financial officers and other officers with responsibilities comparable to the foregoing TDS officers, as reported in proxy statements and salary surveys. The Compensation Committee also considers recommendations from the President and CEO regarding compensation for the named executives other than the President and CEO, each of which reports directly to him. The Vice President—Human Resources prepares for the committee an analysis of compensation paid to similar executive officers of other comparable companies. See "Benchmarking" above.

        Annually, the nature and extent of each executive officer's personal accomplishments and contributions for the year are determined, based on information submitted by the executive and by others familiar with his or her performance, including the President and CEO in the case of the named executive officers other than the President and CEO. The Compensation Committee evaluates the information in terms of the personal objectives established for such executive officer for the performance appraisal period.

        The Compensation Committee also assesses how well TDS did as a whole during the year, as discussed above, and the extent to which the President and CEO believes the executive officers other than the President and CEO contributed to the results, as discussed below. With respect to executive officers having primary responsibility over a certain business unit or division of TDS, the Compensation Committee considers the performance of the business unit or division and the contribution of the executive officer thereto.

        The Compensation Committee uses these sources and makes the determination of appropriate elements of compensation and ranges for such elements for such identified executive officers based on its informed judgment, using the information provided to it by the Vice President of Human Resources, including information from Towers Watson. The Compensation Committee also considers information from its independent compensation consultant, Compensation Strategies. The elements of compensation and ranges for such elements are not based on any formal analysis nor is there any documentation of this decision making process.

        The Compensation Committee also has access to numerous performance measures and financial statistics prepared by TDS. This financial information includes the audited financial statements of TDS, as well as internal financial reports such as budgets and actual results, operating statistics and other analyses. In 2010 (and 2011 with respect to the performance bonus for 2010), the Compensation Committee also considered information from TDS' compensation consultant, Towers Watson, and its independent compensation consultant, Compensation Strategies, as discussed above. The committee may also consider such other factors as it deems appropriate in making its compensation decisions. No specific measures of performance are considered determinative in the compensation of executive officers. Instead, all the facts and circumstances are taken into consideration by the Compensation Committee. Ultimately, it is the informed judgment of the committee, after reviewing the compensation information provided by the Vice President—Human Resources, TDS' compensation consultant, Towers

43


Watson, and its independent compensation consultant, Compensation Strategies, that determines the elements of compensation and total compensation for the executive officers.

        The base salary element of compensation of each officer is set within the range identified for this element based on an assessment of the responsibilities and the performance of such officer, also taking into account the performance of TDS and/or its business units or divisions, other comparable companies, the industry and the overall economy during the preceding year. Column (c), "Salary," of the below Summary Compensation Table includes the dollar value of base salary (cash and non-cash) earned by the identified executive officers during 2010, 2009 and 2008, whether or not paid in such year.

        TDS established performance guidelines and procedures for awarding bonuses to certain officers (not including the President and CEO of each of TDS, U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom). These guidelines and procedures, as amended and restated, were filed by TDS as Exhibit 10.3 to TDS' Form 8-K dated November 18, 2009. The guidelines provide that each year a specified percentage of an officer's bonus will be determined based on individual performance and that the remaining percentage will be based on company performance. For bonuses relating to 2010 performance that were paid in 2011, 55% of an officer's target bonus was based on the officer's individual performance and the remaining 45% was based on company performance. The guidelines provide that, to the extent and only to the extent that any bonus is paid for a performance year, such bonus shall be deemed to have been earned on December 31 of that performance year. In addition, the guidelines specify that, notwithstanding any other provision of the guidelines, 100% of the bonus is discretionary, and that negative discretion may be used to reduce the portion of any bonus calculated pursuant to the guidelines with respect to company performance. The guidelines also specify the officers to whom the guidelines apply, and specify which officers' bonuses are approved by the TDS Compensation Committee and which officers' bonuses are approved by the President and CEO of TDS (or such other TDS officer to whom the President and CEO of TDS delegates such authority). The guidelines also provide that any bonus awarded with respect to a performance year will be paid during the period commencing on the January 1 immediately following the performance year and ending on the March 15 immediately following the performance year.

        In addition, TDS established performance guidelines and procedures for awarding bonuses to the President and CEO. These guidelines and procedures were filed by TDS as Exhibit 10.2 to TDS' Form 8-K dated November 19, 2008. These guidelines and procedures provide that the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion determines whether an annual bonus will be payable to the President and CEO for a performance year and, if so, the amount of such bonus, and describe factors that may be considered by the committee in making such determination, including any factors that the committee in the exercise of its judgment and discretion determines relevant. The guidelines and procedures provide that no single factor will be determinative and no factor will be applied mechanically to calculate any portion of the bonus of the President and CEO. The entire amount of the bonus is discretionary. The guidelines and procedures provide that the President and CEO will have no right or expectation with respect to any bonus until the committee has determined whether a bonus will be paid for a performance year. The guidelines also provide that any bonus awarded with respect to a performance year will be paid during the period commencing on the January 1 immediately following the performance year and ending on the March 15 immediately following the performance year.

        The guidelines and procedures for awarding bonuses to the President and CEO and other officers were amended effective January 1, 2009. These guidelines and procedures were filed by TDS as Exhibits to TDS' Form 8-K dated November 18, 2009. Prior to such amendments, such guidelines and procedures provided that bonuses were not earned until the date the bonus is paid. As a result, bonuses were not reported as earned in the Summary Compensation Table until the year in which bonuses were paid. Effective for 2009, the foregoing guidelines and procedures were amended to provide that, to the extent and only to the extent that any bonus is paid for a performance year, such bonus shall be deemed to have been earned on December 31 of that performance year. For accounting purposes, TDS had been accruing bonuses in the performance year as required by Generally Accepted Accounting

44


Principles. The effect of the amendment to the guidelines and procedures was that, effective for the 2009 bonus year and bonus years thereafter, TDS reports bonuses in the performance year for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table in its Proxy Statement.

        In addition, the President and CEO of TDS Telecom is a named executive officer of TDS. The TDS Telecom Chairman and TDS Compensation Committee have established guidelines and procedures for awarding bonuses to the President and CEO of TDS Telecom. These guidelines and procedures were filed as Exhibit 10.27 to TDS' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. These guidelines and procedures provide that the TDS Telecom Chairman and TDS Compensation Committee in their sole discretion determine whether an annual bonus will be payable to the TDS Telecom President and CEO for a performance year and, if so, the amount of such bonus, and describe factors that may be considered by the TDS Telecom Chairman and TDS Compensation Committee in making such determination, including any factors that they in the exercise of their judgment and discretion determine relevant. The guidelines and procedures provide that no single factor will be determinative and no factor will be applied mechanically to calculate any portion of the bonus of the President and CEO of TDS Telecom. The entire amount of the bonus is discretionary. The guidelines and procedures provide that the President and CEO of TDS Telecom will have no right or expectation with respect to any bonus until the TDS Telecom Chairman and TDS Compensation Committee have determined whether a bonus will be paid for a performance year. The foregoing guidelines and bonus plan also provide that, to the extent and only to the extent that any bonus is paid for a performance year, such bonus shall be deemed to have been earned on December 31 of that performance year. The guidelines also provide that any bonus awarded with respect to a performance year will be paid during the period commencing on the January 1 immediately following the performance year and ending on the March 15 immediately following the performance year.

        The following discusses annual cash compensation with respect to the specified named executive officers.

President and CEO

        The Compensation Committee evaluates the performance of the President and CEO of TDS in light of the annual and ongoing objectives for TDS and for its primary business units and the attainment of those objectives, and sets the elements of compensation for the President and CEO based on such performance evaluation and compensation principles.

        In addition to the general facts and circumstances that are considered for all executive officers as discussed above, facts and circumstances that the Compensation Committee considers in determining the annual cash compensation of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., the President and CEO of TDS (whom we sometimes refer to as "TDS CEO" in this discussion), include the following: the responsibilities of the TDS CEO; the period of time that the TDS CEO has held this position and served with TDS; the Compensation Committee's subjective view of the TDS CEO's contribution to the growth and development of TDS during that time; the fact that TDS is a holding company that includes two primary subsidiaries, TDS Telecom and U.S. Cellular; the fact that the TDS CEO is the Chairman of each of such subsidiaries; the prior year's performance of TDS Telecom (as discussed above) and U.S. Cellular (as discussed in the U.S. Cellular proxy statement); the overall performance of TDS, as discussed above; the performance of the TDS CEO, as discussed below; the personal objectives of the TDS CEO for the preceding year, as discussed below; the annual cash compensation of the other named executive officers, including the salary increase and bonus granted to each of such other officers, as discussed below; and the fact that the TDS CEO has a substantial beneficial interest in TDS, as described below under "Security Ownership of Management", and will benefit together with other shareholders based on the performance of TDS.

        With respect to the TDS CEO, the Compensation Committee considers the overall performance of TDS based on the weighted average performance of TDS Telecom and U.S. Cellular, as discussed above. No minimum level of performance is established for overall TDS performance. Instead, the Compensation Committee considers overall TDS performance after the fact but without any predetermined threshold performance level.

45

        The following shows the level of achievement with respect to 2010.

        As noted above, the adjusted overall percentage achievement of performance targets with respect to 2010 was 100% for TDS Telecom. As discussed in the U.S. Cellular proxy statement, the adjusted overall percentage achievement of performance targets with respect to 2010 was 70% for U.S. Cellular. As discussed above, the weighted average adjusted performance of these business units was 77.5%.

        The following provides information with respect to the achievements of the TDS CEO for 2010 related to the management of TDS and its business units: (i) TDS' adjusted overall company performance was 77.5% of target, as discussed above; (ii) TDS assisted U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom with identifying and exploring business opportunities, including new services, products, marketing initiatives and acquisitions (this included providing support for U.S. Cellular's Belief Project and acquiring several 700 MHz licenses to support U.S. Cellular's LTE deployment); (iii) TDS assured that the business units had sound strategies and programs which delivered high levels of customer satisfaction and successfully differentiated them in the marketplace (this included assisting both business units in their strategic planning work, providing analytical resources and executive review, which delivered significant progress in many areas at TDS Telecom (including in the areas of IPTV, hosted and managed services, the Broadband Improvement Program, triple play churn, managedIP and a customer-premise based IP solution), and which involved oversight of changes in leadership and focus on the launch of The Belief Project at U.S. Cellular); (iv) TDS assured that the business units identified and realized additional cost savings from process improvements and other efficiencies (which resulted in U.S. Cellular identifying and committing to several cost savings opportunities and TDS Telecom improving its operating cash flow margin by effectively managing its costs as it pursued its growth strategy); (v) TDS assured that the new U.S. Cellular Operating Support System/Business Support System was the best available alternative, that the needed contractual arrangements were handled successfully, and that implementation began in an effective manner; (vi) TDS sought additional spectrum at reasonable prices, although this was not acquired due to cost or technology issues; (vii) TDS took action to promote the company's interests in spectrum policy and other critical policy areas to permit U.S. Cellular to increase its spectrum depth at reasonable prices in key markets, and enhance its footprint (which included providing congressional testimony on proposed spectrum legislation); (viii) TDS actively assisted TDS Telecom's initiative to evaluate hosted and managed services acquisitions (which resulted in two acquisitions in 2010), as well as clustered ILEC acquisitions and those that build scale; (ix) TDS worked on completing U.S. Cellular's fixed asset system conversion to SAP; (x) TDS analyzed the build up of cash across the TDS enterprise and how best to utilize the cash, which resulted in increased yield while minimizing risk; and (xi) TDS management collaboratively worked with the TDS board of directors to improve the content of the strategic planning process of the enterprise.

        In addition to the foregoing achievements of TDS, other important considerations of the Compensation Committee with respect to the TDS CEO's performance were that, in 2010, the TDS CEO successfully identified and recruited a highly qualified person to fill the position of President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Cellular, and that the TDS CEO added greater emphasis and receptivity to strategic planning at TDS and its business units.

        The Compensation Committee did not perform an individual assessment and analysis of each of the foregoing objectives. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee is a member of the TDS board of directors, and participates in regular and special board meetings where TDS' objectives and progress relating thereto are presented, considered and discussed. Based on such participation and the foregoing achievements, the Compensation Committee believes that the TDS CEO's overall individual performance exceeded expectations in 2010.

46

        The base salary of Mr. Carlson was $1,275,000 for 2009 and the Compensation Committee determined to increase this amount to $1,313,300 for 2010, or an increase of about 3.0%. The median salary with respect to the TDS CEO's salary for 2010 based on a survey prepared by Compensation Strategies was $980,000, which represented the 50th percentile of a population of comparable base salaries. The range with respect to the TDS CEO for 2010 based on the survey from TDS' compensation consultant, Towers Watson, was approximately $1,000,000 to $1,210,000, which represented the 50th to 75th percentiles, respectively, of a population of comparable base salaries. See "Benchmarking" above. Mr. Carlson's base salary exceeds the foregoing median and range based on the TDS Compensation Committee's subjective view of the appropriate base salary considering Mr. Carlson's responsibilities and his performance as President and CEO.

        For disclosure purposes, the base salary of Mr. Carlson for 2011 was increased by $39,400 to $1,352,700.

        In March 2011, the Compensation Committee approved a bonus of $875,000 for Mr. Carlson with respect to 2010 performance, which was paid in 2011. Mr. Carlson's informal target bonus with respect to the 2010 bonus paid in 2011 was 75% of his 2010 base salary of $1,313,300, or $984,975. Mr. Carlson's bonus of $875,000 was approximately 89% of his target. This reflects the overall company performance of approximately 77.5% for 2010 and the Compensation Committee's assessment of Mr. Carlson's personal achievements and performance as discussed above.

Other Executive Officers

        With respect to the officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table other than the TDS CEO, the Compensation Committee considers the TDS CEO's evaluation of the performance of such executive officers and sets the annual base and bonus compensation levels for such executive officers based on such performance evaluations and the compensation principles described above. In addition to the general factors described above, the compensation elements of certain officers are based on their specific responsibilities.

        In addition to the general facts and circumstances that are considered for all executive officers as discussed above, additional facts and circumstances that the TDS CEO and Compensation Committee consider in determining the annual cash compensation of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (whom we sometimes refer to as "CFO" in this discussion) are as follows: the responsibilities of the CFO; the period of time that the CFO has held this position and served with TDS; the Compensation Committee's subjective view of the CFO's contributions to TDS during that time; the prior year's performance of TDS, as discussed above; the Compensation Committee's subjective view of the CFO's contributions to such performance of TDS; the CFO's relationship with management and personnel of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom; whether there has been any restatement of financial statements and the nature of any such restatement; progress in improving internal controls and remediating control deficiencies; and the TDS CEO's assessment of achievement of personal objectives of the CFO for the preceding year, as discussed below.

        Mr. Meyers' base salary was evaluated based on his responsibilities as TDS' CFO, and considering the compensation of officers at comparable companies with similar responsibilities. The median salary with respect to the TDS CFO's salary for 2010 based on a survey prepared by Compensation Strategies was $516,000, which represented the 50th percentile of a population of comparable base salaries. The range with respect to the TDS CFO for 2010 based on the survey from TDS' compensation consultant, Towers Watson, was approximately $500,000 to $600,000, which represented the 50th to 75th percentiles, respectively, of a population of comparable base salaries. See "Benchmarking" above. The

47

base salary approved for Mr. Meyers for 2010 was $632,500, representing an increase of about 3.0% over his 2009 base salary of $614,000.

        The salary of $632,500 exceeds the foregoing median and range for the following reasons: Prior to his appointment as CFO of TDS, Mr. Meyers was the Executive Vice President—Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Cellular for many years and had been employed by U.S. Cellular in financial and accounting capacities since 1987. Mr. Meyers became the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TDS on January 1, 2007. Mr. Meyers was promoted to this position to succeed the former CFO with general directions to improve the accounting and finance functions of TDS and its business units, complete the restatement of financial statements, remediate material weaknesses, file all future financial statements on time and without further restatements, fully staff accounting and control functions enterprise-wide, develop detailed system-wide accounting policies and processes, improve the budget process, and improve relationships and communications with outside auditors, outside counsel, directors, other officers, management, business units, and the business development, corporate strategy and enterprise strategy groups. Since that time, Mr. Meyers' performance at TDS has exceeded expectations. Accordingly, the TDS CEO and Compensation Committee believe that Mr. Meyers' base salary is at an appropriate level considering the importance of Mr. Meyers' responsibilities, his performance at TDS since 2007, his long period of service to U.S. Cellular and TDS and his extensive experience with and knowledge of U.S. Cellular and TDS and the telecommunications industry.

        For disclosure purposes, the base salary of Mr. Meyers for 2011 was increased by $26,000 to $658,500.

        Mr. Meyers received a bonus of $353,900 with respect to 2010 performance, which was paid in 2011. Mr. Meyers' target bonus was 50% of his 2010 base salary of $632,500, or $316,250, of which 45% is for company performance and 55% is for individual performance. As described above, TDS' adjusted performance was 77.5% of target for 2010. Mr. Meyers' bonus of $353,900 represents a bonus of 77.5% of his target bonus for company performance and about 140% of his target bonus for individual performance. The individual performance percentage was based on the recommendation of the TDS CEO, reflecting the fact that Mr. Meyers' performance in 2010 exceeded expectations, as discussed below.

        The TDS CEO believes that the CFO's overall individual performance exceeded expectations in 2010. In particular, the following identifies the primary achievements of Mr. Meyers in 2010: Mr. Meyers (i) maintained high quality accounting and control throughout the TDS enterprise, (ii) achieved excellent investor relations, (iii) made major contributions to the strategy development process, (iv) completed two successful refinancings, (v) maintained good relations with all three rating agencies, (vi) maintained good relations with the outside auditor and successfully transitioned to the new audit partner, (vii) worked closely with the new U.S. Cellular President and CEO and her direct reports to successfully integrate her into her new role, (viii) achieved outstanding results on the TDS culture survey, (ix) developed a strong sense of teamwork throughout the accounting and finance team within the TDS enterprise, (x) provided valuable advice to the TDS President and CEO on a number of important business and human resource issues, (xi) maintained a very visible presence at U.S. Cellular in Chicago and at TDS Corporate in Madison, as well as at TDS Corporate in Chicago, (xii) was a major innovator and valuable contributor to TDS strategy meetings, (xiii) maintained good relations throughout the TDS enterprise, and (xiv) took on key responsibilities, contributed valuable ideas and demonstrated a long term view in the best interest of TDS and its business units.

        In addition to the general facts and circumstances that are considered for all executive officers as discussed above, additional facts and circumstances that the TDS CEO and Compensation Committee consider in determining the annual cash compensation of the Senior Vice President of Acquisitions and Corporate Development (whom we sometimes refer to as "SVP-ACD" in this discussion) are as follows: the responsibilities of the SVP-ACD; the period of time that the SVP-ACD has held this position and

48

served with TDS; the Compensation Committee's subjective view of the SVP-ACD's contributions to TDS during that time; the prior year's performance of TDS, as discussed above; the Compensation Committee's subjective view of the SVP-ACD's contributions to such performance of TDS; and the TDS CEO's assessment of achievement of personal objectives of the SVP-ACD for the preceding year, as discussed below.

        Mr. Williamson's base salary was evaluated based on his responsibilities as SVP-ACD, and considering the compensation of officers at comparable companies with similar responsibilities. The median salary with respect to the TDS SVP-ACD's salary for 2010 based on a survey prepared by Compensation Strategies was $366,000, which represents the 50th percentile of a population of comparable base salaries. The range with respect to the TDS SVP-ACD for 2010 based on the survey from TDS' compensation consultant, Towers Watson, was approximately $355,000 to $430,000, which represented the 50th to 75th percentiles, respectively, of a population of comparable base salaries. See "Benchmarking" above. The base salary approved for Mr. Williamson for 2010 was $594,500, representing an increase of about 2.0% over his 2009 base salary of $583,000.

        The salary of $594,500 exceeds the foregoing median and range for the following reasons: Mr. Williamson has been a vice president and the chief corporate development officer of TDS since 1995. Mr. Williamson has been a senior vice president since 1998. TDS considers its corporate development activities to be key and integral business functions. Mr. Williamson also provides important services with respect to strategic planning for TDS and its business units. Mr. Williamson has consistently exceeded expectations during his lengthy tenure at TDS. As a result, Mr. Williamson's compensation has risen above the 75th percentile as a consequence of his many years of service and salary increases over such period of time commensurate with his consistently high rating. The TDS CEO and Compensation Committee believe that Mr. Williamson's base salary is at an appropriate level considering the importance of Mr. Williamson's responsibilities and his consistently outstanding performance over a long period of time.

        For disclosure purposes, the base salary of Mr. Williamson for 2011 was increased by $16,500 to $611,000.

        Mr. Williamson received a bonus of $235,100 with respect to 2010 performance, which was paid in 2011. Mr. Williamson's target bonus with respect to the 2010 bonus paid in 2011 was 35% of his 2010 base salary of $594,500, or $208,075, of which 45% is for company performance and 55% is for individual performance. As described above, TDS' adjusted performance was 77.5% of target for 2010. Mr. Williamson's bonus of $235,100 represents a bonus of 77.5% of his target bonus for company performance and about 142% of his target bonus for individual performance. The individual performance percentage was based on the recommendation of the TDS CEO, reflecting the fact that Mr. Williamson's performance in 2010 exceeded expectations, as discussed below.

        The TDS CEO believes that Mr. Williamson's overall individual performance exceeded expectations in 2010. In particular, the following identifies the primary achievements of Mr. Williamson in 2010: Mr. Williamson (i) led TDS in the acquisition of two Hosted and Managed Services companies, (ii) led TDS in the acquisition of several 700 MHz licenses to enable U.S. Cellular to rollout 4G services, (iii) developed strategy to evaluate additional new business opportunities for TDS and its business units, (iv) took a co-lead in all corporate strategy work, (v) provided expert advice to the TDS President and CEO and to TDS on important strategic, economic, business and human resource matters, (vi) reviewed and made appropriate decisions with respect to numerous acquisition possibilities and spectrum opportunities, (vii) made excellent presentations to both the TDS and U.S. Cellular boards of directors, (viii) conducted and led excellent corporate development team meetings, (ix) made many excellent contributions in strategy meetings, and (x) maintained excellent relationships with other business functions and business units.

49

        In addition to the general facts and circumstances that are considered for all executive officers as discussed above, additional facts and circumstances that the Chairman of TDS Telecom and the TDS Compensation Committee consider in determining the annual cash compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer of TDS Telecom (whom we sometimes refer to as "TDS Telecom CEO" in this discussion) are as follows: Mr. Wittwer's position and the fact that, as President and CEO of TDS Telecom, Mr. Wittwer is primarily responsible for the performance of TDS Telecom; the fact that Mr. Wittwer has held this position since January 2007; that previously Mr. Wittwer served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (COO) of TDS Telecom, President of TDS Telecom's incumbent local exchange carrier operations and Executive Vice President—Staff Operations, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of TDS Telecom, and has been employed by TDS Telecom since 1983; the fact that TDS Telecom is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TDS and is not publicly-traded; and the subjective views of the TDS Telecom Chairman and the TDS Compensation Committee of the extent to which Mr. Wittwer contributed to the performance of TDS Telecom during his employment at TDS Telecom.

        The TDS Telecom Chairman and the TDS Compensation Committee also considered TDS Telecom's performance for the preceding year and the extent to which the TDS Telecom CEO contributed to such performance. As the TDS Telecom CEO, David A. Wittwer is the principal executive officer of TDS Telecom and supervises and controls all of the business and affairs of TDS Telecom. As a result, Mr. Wittwer is primarily responsible for the performance of TDS Telecom.

        Mr. Wittwer's base salary was evaluated based on his responsibilities as the TDS Telecom CEO, and considering the compensation of officers at comparable companies with similar responsibilities. The median salary with respect to the TDS Telecom CEO's salary for 2010 based on a survey prepared by Compensation Strategies was $529,000, which represented the 50th percentile of a population of comparable base salaries. The range with respect to the TDS Telecom CEO for 2010 based on the survey from TDS' compensation consultant, Towers Watson, was approximately $560,000 to $685,000, which represented the 50th to 75th percentiles, respectively, of a population of comparable base salaries. The population of comparable base salaries was comprised one-half of the base salaries of chief executive officers of companies and one-half of the base salaries of sector heads of a major segment of a company's operations, similar in size to TDS Telecom. See "Benchmarking" above. The base salary approved for Mr. Wittwer for 2010 was $513,000, representing an increase of about 3.4% over his 2009 base salary of $496,000. The base salary approved for Mr. Wittwer for 2010 of $513,000 reflects the level considered to be appropriate in the judgment of the TDS Telecom Chairman and TDS Compensation Committee based on the factors discussed above.

        For disclosure purposes, the base salary of Mr. Wittwer for 2011 was increased by $20,000 to $533,000.

        Mr. Wittwer received a bonus of $297,500 with respect to 2010 performance, which was paid in 2011. Mr. Wittwer's informal target bonus with respect to the 2010 bonus paid in 2011 was 50% of his 2010 base salary of $513,000, or $256,500. As described above, TDS Telecom's adjusted performance for 2010 was 100% of target. Mr. Wittwer's bonus of $297,500 was approximately 116% of his target for 2010. This primarily reflects TDS Telecom's adjusted performance of 100% for 2010 and the achievements of Mr. Wittwer in 2010.

        In particular, the following identifies the primary achievements of Mr. Wittwer in 2010: Mr. Wittwer (i) led TDS Telecom to an increase in revenues and cash flow, raising the level of customer satisfaction (despite a reduced workforce) and an increasing share in the high speed data market (ILEC) and in the small, medium business market (CLEC), (ii) increased TDS Telecom's penetration of high speed data, (iii) continued to increase TDS Telecom's triple play penetration, (iv) led effective regulatory and legislative efforts, (v) led TDS Telecom in winning over $100 million in Stimulus Fund grants, (vi) led

50

TDS Telecom in the successful integration of acquisitions, (vii) led TDS Telecom in developing strategies for technological improvements, (viii) made important contributions to strategy and planning and made clear and convincing presentations to the TDS board of directors, (ix) led TDS Telecom in its Hosted and Managed Services strategy, (x) kept tight control on TDS Telecom's costs, and (xi) represented TDS Telecom well in industry forums and with the investor community.

        The following shows certain information with respect to each named executive officer relating to the bonus for 2010 performance (paid in 2011) showing the amount of bonus awarded as a result of the achievement of the above company performance measures and the amount awarded on a discretionary, individual basis:

 
   LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. 		  Kenneth R.
Meyers 		  Scott H.
Williamson 		  David A.
Wittwer 		 

2010 Base salary

   $ 1,313,300   $ 632,500   $ 594,500   $ 513,000  

Target bonus percentage (1)

     N/A     50 %   35 %   N/A  
                   

Target Bonus for 2010 Paid in 2011

     N/A   $ 316,250   $ 208,075     N/A  
                   

Amount of 2010 Bonus Paid in 2011 based on Company Performance

     N/A     45 %   45 %   N/A  
                   

Target Bonus for Company Performance

     N/A   $ 142,313   $ 93,634     N/A  
                   

Amounts reported under "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column

                          
   

Allocation of 68.5% based on unadjusted company performance in 2010

     N/A   $ 97,484   $ 64,139     N/A  
                   

Amounts reported under "Bonus" column:

                          
   

Discretionary adjustment of company performance from 68.5% to 77.5%

     N/A   $ 12,809   $ 8,427     N/A  
   

Discretionary bonus

   $ 875,000   $ 243,607   $ 162,534   $ 297,500  
                   
   

Subtotal (reported under "Bonus" column)

   $ 875,000   $ 256,416   $ 170,961   $ 297,500  
                   
 

Total Bonus for 2010 paid in 2011

   $ 875,000   $ 353,900   $ 235,100   $ 297,500  
                   
(1)
Unlike the bonus guidelines for other officers, which provide that a specified percentage of an officer's bonus will be determined based on company performance (with negative discretion) and that the remaining percentage will be discretionary based on individual performance, the bonus guidelines for the President and CEO of TDS (LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.) and the President and CEO of TDS Telecom (David A. Wittwer), do not provide such specificity and provide that the entire amount of the bonus is discretionary. Accordingly, the entire amount of the bonus for each of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. and David A. Wittwer is reported under the "Bonus" column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Long-Term Equity Compensation

        The Compensation Committee also determines long-term equity compensation awards for the named executive officers under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee may establish performance measures and restriction periods, and determine the form, amount and timing of each grant of an award, the number of shares of stock subject to an award, the purchase price or base price per share of stock associated with the award, the time and conditions of exercise or settlement of the award and all other terms and conditions of the award.

51

        Although the Compensation Committee has the discretion to grant various awards, it generally only grants service-based restricted stock units and service-based options. The restricted stock units generally vest in full (cliff vesting) in December in the second year following the grant, subject to continued employment. Options are exercisable until the tenth anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment. Options granted in 2010 become exercisable with respect to one-third of the number of shares subject to the option on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

        With respect to long-term compensation, the Vice President—Human Resources prepares for the Compensation Committee an analysis of long-term compensation paid to similar officers of comparable companies (see Benchmarking above). This information is presented to the committee, which approves the long-term compensation of the named executive officers in part based on such information. The committee also looks at the mix of salary, bonus and long-term incentive compensation, and obtains additional information from its compensation consultant, Compensation Strategies, as discussed above.

        Long-term compensation decisions for the named executive officers are made by the Compensation Committee in a manner similar to that described above for annual base salary and bonus decisions, except that the stock options and restricted stock units will generally vest over several years, in order to reflect the goal of relating long-term compensation of the named executive officers to increases in shareholder value over the same period. The President and CEO may recommend to the Compensation Committee long-term compensation in the form of stock option and restricted stock unit grants, stock appreciation rights ("SARs") or otherwise for executive officers other than the President and CEO.

        The performance of TDS is also a factor in determining the number of restricted stock units which will be awarded with respect to the executive officers. The named executive officer receives an award of restricted stock units in the current year based primarily on the achievement of certain levels of corporate performance in the immediately preceding year, and an award of options in the current year based primarily on the achievement of certain levels of individual performance in the immediately preceding year.

        Executive officers do not become entitled to any options or restricted stock units as a result of the achievement of any corporate or individual performance levels. The award of options and restricted stock units is entirely discretionary and the named executive officer has no right to any options or restricted stock units unless and until they are awarded. Pursuant to SEC rules, awards with respect to 2009 performance are included in the Summary Compensation Table below as compensation earned in 2010. All awards are granted in consideration for future service over the vesting period of the award.

        The named executive officers received an award of restricted stock units in 2010 based on the achievement of certain levels of corporate performance in 2009. Awards of restricted stock units in 2009 and 2008 were based on the achievement of certain levels of corporate performance in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Column (e), "Stock Awards," of the Summary Compensation Table includes the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation ("FASB ASC 718") in 2010, 2009 and 2008. In years prior to 2010, the grant date fair value of restricted stock units was calculated as the product of the number of restricted stock units granted and the closing price of the underlying shares on the date of grant. However, FASB ASC 718 permits this value to be reduced by the discounted cash flow of the dividends that would normally be received on the underlying shares, because dividends are not earned with respect to the underlying shares until after the award becomes vested. Accordingly, as permitted by FASB ASC 718, beginning in 2010, the value of restricted stock unit awards relating to TDS Special Common Shares was reduced by the discounted cash flow of the dividends that would normally be received on the underlying shares. The Black-Scholes valuation model was used to compute the grant date fair value of the TDS restricted stock unit awards without the discounted cash flow of dividends that would normally be received on the underlying shares and this has been reported in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. No change was made in the way that U.S. Cellular restricted stock units are valued because U.S. Cellular does not currently pay dividends.

        The named executive officers also received an award of options in 2010 based on the achievement of certain levels of individual performance in 2009 and received an award of options in 2009 and 2008

52


based on the achievement of certain levels of individual performance in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Column (f), "Option Awards," of the Summary Compensation Table includes the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 in 2010, 2009 and 2008. The grant date fair value of stock options is calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model.

        Stock option awards represent a performance award based on an assessment of the individual's performance for the prior year. The restricted stock unit awards are based on TDS or business unit performance for the prior year. For awards granted in 2010 based on 2009 performance, the percentages of the total target long-term incentive value are 60% for stock options and 40% for restricted stock units. The total target long-term incentive value is determined primarily by multiplying the officer's salary by a multiple. The amount of this multiple is determined by the officer's title and job responsibilities and the benchmarking data from Towers Watson. See "Benchmarking" above.

        The value used for stock options and restricted stock units was determined by Towers Watson using a binomial methodology based on the stock price for TDS Special Common Shares of $27.34 on May 24, 2010. The values calculated by Towers Watson were $8.32 per TDS stock option and $23.68 per TDS restricted stock unit.

        The following provides information on how the foregoing was used to calculate the options and restricted stock units granted to the TDS CEO in 2010, and then describes how awards to other named executive officers were determined.

        On May 25, 2010, the Compensation Committee awarded the TDS CEO stock options to acquire 250,000 TDS Special Common Shares based on 2009 individual performance. The TDS options granted on May 25, 2010 have an exercise price of $26.66 per share, which was the closing price of a TDS Special Common Share on May 25, 2010, become exercisable with respect to one third of the shares subject to option on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant and are exercisable until May 24, 2020.

        On May 25, 2010, the Compensation Committee also awarded the TDS CEO restricted stock units with respect to 37,400 TDS Special Common Shares based on 2009 company performance. The TDS restricted stock units will become vested on December 15, 2012.

        As noted above, the 2009 base salary of the TDS CEO was $1,275,000. The multiple used for the TDS CEO was 239%. This multiple was based on the information from Towers Watson for CEOs of the companies included in the benchmarking data.

        The total target long-term incentive value for the TDS CEO using the above formula was $3,047,000, determined by multiplying $1,275,000 by 239%. Using this amount, the target allocation for each component of long-term compensation was determined by using the percentages identified above, as follows:

Grant Type
  Percentage of Target Value   Amount  

Stock Options

     60 % $ 1,828,200  

Restricted Stock Units

     40 % $ 1,218,800  
           

Total

     100 % $ 3,047,000  
           

        Dividing the foregoing values by $8.32 per TDS stock option and $23.68 per TDS restricted stock unit results in the following calculation of the target options and restricted stock units. The following compares this target amount to the amounts actually granted by the Compensation Committee in 2010 to the TDS CEO:

Grant Type
  Target Value   Target Grant   Actual Grant  

Stock Options

   $ 1,828,200     219,800     250,000  

Restricted Stock Units

   $ 1,218,800     51,470     37,400  
               

Total

   $ 3,047,000     n/a     n/a  
               

53

        The Compensation Committee granted approximately 114% of the target of stock options based on its view that the TDS CEO had exceeded his personal objectives, identified above. With respect to the restricted stock units, the actual grant was 72.7% of the target grant based on TDS' overall performance in 2009.

        The following options and restricted stock units with respect to TDS Special Common Shares were granted to the other named executive officers in 2010:

Name
  Number of Shares Underlying Stock Options   Number of Shares Underlying Restricted Stock Units  

Kenneth R. Meyers

     132,500     17,000  

Scott H. Williamson

     91,200     11,700  

David A. Wittwer

     92,800     12,200  

        The following summarizes the information described above for the TDS CEO and provides comparable information with respect to option and restricted stock unit grants for the CFO, SVP-ACD and TDS Telecom CEO in 2010.

 
    
   Formula   TDS CEO   CFO   SVP-ACD   TDS
Telecom
CEO 		 

a

  

2009 Salary

       $ 1,275,000   $ 614,000   $ 583,000   $ 496,000  

b

  

Multiple used

         239 %   225 %   163 %   195 %

c

  

Long-Term Incentive Target Value

   a × b   $ 3,047,000   $ 1,382,000   $ 950,000   $ 967,000  

d

  

Options Target

   c × 60%/$8.32     219,800     99,660     68,510     69,740  

e

  

Approx. Individual Performance % for 2009

         114 %   133 %   133 %   133 %

f

  

Options Granted

   d × e     250,000     132,500     91,200     92,800  

g

  

Target RSUs

   c × 40%/$23.68     51,470     23,345     16,047     16,334  

h

  

Company/Business Unit Performance % for 2009

         72.7 %   72.7 %   72.7 %   74.8 %

 

RSUs Granted

   g × h     37,400     17,000     11,700     12,200  

        The individual performance percentage in the above table is based on each officer's individual performance assessment relating to 2009. The individual performance percentage for the TDS CEO was approximately 114% based on the Compensation Committee's view that the TDS CEO had exceeded expectations in 2009. The individual performance percentage for each of the CFO, SVP-ACD and TDS Telecom CEO was approximately 133% based on the TDS CEO's evaluation and recommendation to the Compensation Committee that the CFO, SVP-ACD and TDS Telecom CEO had exceeded expectations in 2009.

        The Company/Business Unit Performance percentage represents the overall performance of TDS or TDS Telecom, as applicable. The overall company performance for TDS in 2009 was 72.7%. Accordingly, each of the identified TDS Corporate executive officers received 72.7% of his target restricted stock units. The business unit performance for TDS Telecom in 2009 was 74.8%. Accordingly, the TDS Telecom CEO received 74.8% of his target restricted stock units.

54

Analysis of Compensation

        The following table identifies the percentage of each element of total compensation of each of the named executive officers other than Mary N. Dillon based on the Summary Compensation Table for 2010:

 
   LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. 		  Kenneth R.
Meyers 		  Scott H.
Williamson 		  David A.
Wittwer 		 

Salary

     24.5 %   24.0 %   30.2 %   26.4 %

Bonus

     16.4 %   9.7 %   8.7 %   15.3 %

Stock Awards

     18.4 %   17.3 %   15.2 %   16.0 %

Stock Options

     39.1 %   42.1 %   38.8 %   40.0 %

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

     0 %   3.7 %   3.3 %   0 %

Other

     1.6 %   3.2 %   3.8 %   2.3 %
                   

    100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %   100.0 %
                   

        As indicated in the Summary Compensation Table, LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.'s total compensation for 2010 was $5,350,036 and the total compensation for the other named executive officers, excluding Mary N. Dillon, for 2010 ranged from a high of $2,631,441 to a low of $1,942,887. Mr. Carlson's total compensation for 2010 is approximately 2.0 times the total compensation for 2010 of the next highest compensated named executive officer, other than Mary N. Dillon. Ms. Dillon's compensation in 2010 would not be representative of a typical year because she was first employed as of June 2010 and received compensation based on the terms of the letter agreement relating to her employment rather than based on individual or company performance.

        The following explains the reasons for the disparity between the compensation of the President and CEO and the other named executive officers, and the disparities in compensation among the other named executive officers. As noted herein, TDS' overall compensation objectives are to (i) support TDS' overall business strategy and objectives; (ii) attract and retain high quality management; (iii) link individual compensation with attainment of individual performance goals and with attainment of business unit and TDS objectives; and (iv) provide competitive compensation opportunities consistent with the financial performance of TDS.

        As noted herein, TDS determines the amount of compensation to pay or provide to each named executive officer considering compensation practices of peers and other companies with similar characteristics, in order to support TDS' overall business strategy and objectives. As noted herein, TDS recognizes that it must compensate its executive officers in a competitive manner comparable to similar companies in order to attract and retain high quality management, attain or exceed business objectives and targeted financial performance and increase shareholder value.

        Considering the foregoing, TDS recognizes that it needs to and believes that it should compensate the President and CEO at a level that considers the compensation of presidents and CEOs of similar companies, which compensation is higher than the compensation of other named executive officers of such companies. TDS believes that this is necessary to attract and retain a highly qualified person to serve as President and CEO and to compete successfully against other companies. A level of compensation similar to that paid to the President and CEO is not necessary to attract and retain, and therefore is not appropriate for, the other named executive officers. However, TDS recognizes that it needs to and believes that it should compensate the other named executive officers at levels that reflect the compensation of similarly situated positions at similar companies in order to attract and retain high quality persons for such positions at TDS.

        In addition, other factors have an impact on the amount of compensation of each particular officer, as discussed in detail above. For instance, an officer who exceeds expectations would generally have a higher relative level of compensation for his particular function than an officer who did not exceed expectations, all other things being equal. Further discussion of the basis for compensation levels of the individual officers based on TDS' performance, the executive's contribution to such performance, and the executive's individual performance is set forth above in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

55

        The Compensation Committee believes that the elements of compensation and total compensation of the above named executive officers of TDS were set at an appropriate level considering the foregoing principles.

        Mary N. Dillon's compensation in 2010 was set forth in a letter agreement dated May 3, 2010 related to her employment with U.S. Cellular effective June 1, 2010. This letter agreement provides for the following: (i) a base salary of $725,000 per year through December 31, 2010, with a performance review following year-end 2010; (ii) a one-time payment of $450,000 on the three month anniversary of Ms. Dillon's date of employment; (iii) a one-time payment of $250,000 on the fifteenth month anniversary of her date of employment; (iv) a 2010 bonus of at least $580,000; (v) starting in 2011, Ms. Dillon's target bonus opportunity will be 80% of her base salary for the year; (vi) a grant of 75,000 U.S. Cellular stock options on her first day of employment at a strike price equal to the closing price of U.S. Cellular's stock on that date, to vest in 3 equal annual installments, on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of the grant; (vii) a grant of 20,000 U.S. Cellular restricted stock units on her first day of employment, to cliff vest on the third anniversary of the date of the grant; (viii) in the event that Ms. Dillon terminates without Cause or for Good Reason (as defined in the letter agreement) within two years of her starting date, she will fully vest in the foregoing stock option and restricted stock unit awards, and will have one year from the date of such a termination to exercise the options; (ix) in the event that Ms. Dillon terminates without Cause or for Good Reason within two years of her starting date, subject to Ms. Dillon's execution of a release of all claims against TDS and U.S. Cellular, she will receive an amount equal to one year of her then current salary; (x) a grant of an additional 75,000 U.S. Cellular stock options on her first day of employment at a strike price equal to the closing price of U.S. Cellular's stock on that date, which will cliff vest on the sixth anniversary of the date of the grant; (xi) a grant of an additional 25,000 U.S. Cellular restricted stock units on her first day of employment, which will cliff vest on the sixth anniversary of the date of the grant; (xii) starting in 2011, annual grants of U.S. Cellular stock options and restricted stock units; (xiii) the total combined value of her stock option award and restricted stock unit award in each of 2011 and 2012 will be no less than $1,800,000; and (xiv) a seat on the U.S. Cellular Board.

        In the future, subject to the terms of such agreement, Ms. Dillon's annual cash compensation will be approved by LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., the Chairman of U.S. Cellular, and long-term compensation for Ms. Dillon will approved by the long-term incentive compensation committee of U.S. Cellular, as described in the 2011 proxy statement of U.S. Cellular.

Other Benefits and Plans Available to Identified Officers

        The identified officers participate in certain benefits and plans, as described below.

        As noted herein, TDS' overall compensation objectives for its executive officers are to (i) support TDS' overall business strategy and objectives; (ii) attract and retain high quality management; (iii) link individual compensation with attainment of individual performance goals and with attainment of business unit and TDS objectives; and (iv) provide competitive compensation opportunities consistent with the financial performance of TDS.

        To achieve these objectives, the Compensation Committee believes that the named executive officers must be offered a competitive compensation package, including benefits and plans. TDS' compensation packages are designed to compete with other companies for talented employees. TDS' benefits and plans are part of this package and are also designed to enable TDS to attract and retain highly qualified employees, including the named executive officers. Thus, the benefits and plans fit into TDS' overall compensation objectives primarily by helping TDS achieve the second objective of TDS' overall compensation objectives, which is to attract and retain high quality management. Benefits and plans are an important part of the mix of compensation used to attract and retain management, but do not otherwise significantly affect decisions relating to other elements of annual or long-term compensation, which are provided consistent with the above compensation objectives, including to support TDS' overall business strategy and objectives, link individual compensation with TDS goals and objectives and provide competitive compensation opportunities consistent with the financial performance of TDS, as well as attract and retain high quality management.

56

Deferred Salary and Bonus under Deferred Compensation Arrangements

        Deferred Salary and/or Bonus Arrangements.    The identified officers are permitted to defer salary and/or bonus pursuant to deferred compensation agreements or plans. The entire amount of the salary earned is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (c) under "Salary," whether or not deferred. The entire amount of the bonus earned is reported in the Summary Compensation Table whether or not deferred. Pursuant to the agreement or plan, the officer's deferred compensation account is credited with interest compounded monthly, computed at a rate equal to one-twelfth of the sum of the average thirty-year Treasury Bond rate for amounts deferred as an employee of TDS or TDS Telecom, or the twenty-year Treasury Bond rate for amounts deferred as an employee of U.S. Cellular, plus 1.25 percentage points, until the deferred compensation amount is paid to such person. As required by SEC rules, column (h) in the Summary Compensation Table includes any portion of such interest that exceeded 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, with compounding (as prescribed under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code), at the time each monthly interest rate was set. The deferred compensation accounts are paid at the time and in the form provided in the applicable plan or agreement, which permits certain distribution elections by the officer.

        As indicated in the below tables, certain of the named executive officers have deferred a specified portion of their salaries pursuant to the above-described arrangements. The executive is always 100% vested in all salary amounts that have been deferred and any interest credited with respect thereto. Accordingly, the executive is entitled to 100% of the amount deferred and all earnings thereon upon any termination. Such amounts are reported below in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table and, because there would not be any increased benefit or accelerated vesting in the event of any termination or change in control, are not included in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

        Deferred Bonus under Long-Term Incentive Plan.    The identified officers are also permitted to defer bonus pursuant to the applicable long-term incentive plan. The entire amount of the bonus earned is reported in the Summary Compensation Table whether or not deferred. Deferred bonus will be deemed invested, as applicable, in phantom TDS Special Common Shares under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan and in phantom USM Common Shares under the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as discussed below. The named executive officers employed by TDS receive a distribution of the deferred compensation account at the earlier of the date elected by the officer and the officer's separation from service (or, with respect to amounts subject to section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the seventh calendar month following the calendar month of the officer's separation from service). The named executive officers employed by U.S. Cellular receive a distribution of the deferred compensation account at the date elected by the officer (either the officer's separation from service, subject to any six-month delay required by section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, or a date specified by the officer). The identified officers that defer bonus also receive a company match. This is discussed below under "TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan" with respect to the identified officers other than Mary N. Dillon, who does not participate in the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Instead, she participates in the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which also has a company match feature as described in the U.S. Cellular proxy statement for its 2011 annual meeting of shareholders.

        Certain named executive officers are parties to executive deferred compensation agreements, pursuant to which they have deferred a specified portion of their bonuses. The executive is always 100% vested in all bonus amounts that have been deferred and any dividends credited with respect thereto. Such amounts are reported below in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table and, because there would not be any increased benefit or accelerated vesting of such vested amounts in the event of any termination or Change in Control, are not included in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan

        Long-term compensation awards under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan were discussed above in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The following provides certain additional information relating to deferred bonus, restricted stock units and stock options.

57

        Under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, executives may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of their annual bonuses up to $400,000 and to receive stock unit matches on the amount deferred. Deferred compensation will be deemed invested in phantom TDS Special Common Shares. TDS match amounts will depend on the amount of annual bonus that is deferred into stock units. Participants receive (i) a 25% stock unit match for amounts deferred up to 50% of their total annual bonus and (ii) a 33% match for amounts deferred that exceed 50% of their total annual bonus. The matched stock units vest ratably at a rate of one-third per year over three years. Column (e), "Stock Awards," of the Summary Compensation Table below includes the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Vested stock units are credited with dividends. The Summary Compensation Table does not include any dividends (or dividend equivalents) on deferred bonus or the related match denominated in phantom TDS stock because such dividends are not preferential under SEC rules, since they are not earned at a rate higher than dividends on TDS' common stock.

        Restricted stock units may be granted under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Column (e), "Stock Awards," of the Summary Compensation Table includes the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Dividends are not earned with respect to shares underlying restricted stock units until the award becomes vested and the shares are issued.

        Stock options may be granted under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Column (f), "Option Awards," of the Summary Compensation Table includes the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Dividends are not earned with respect to shares underlying options until such options are exercised and the shares are issued.

        The TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan and related stock option, restricted stock unit and deferred bonus agreements provide various rights upon termination and/or change in control, as summarized below.

        Stock Options.    The TDS option agreements with named executive officers provide as follows:

        Disability. If the officer ceases to be employed by reason of Disability (a total physical disability which prevents the substantial performance of employment duties for a continuous period of at least six months), the option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the effective date of the officer's termination of employment, and after such date may be exercised by the option holder for a period of 12 months after the effective date of the officer's termination of employment or until the option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter.

        Retirement. If the officer ceases to be employed by reason of Retirement (termination of employment on or after the officer's attainment of age 65 that does not satisfy the definition of "Special Retirement", as set forth below), the option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the effective date of the officer's Retirement, and after such date may be exercised by the holder for a period of 90 days after the effective date of the Retirement or until the option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter. However, effective for options granted in or after 2008, the option will become 100% exercisable if at the time of termination, the officer has attained age 66 and the termination occurs subsequent to the year of grant.

        Special Retirement. If the officer ceases to be employed by reason of Special Retirement, (termination of employment on or after the later of reaching age 62 and the officer's early retirement date or normal retirement date under the TDS Pension Plan), the option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the effective date of the officer's Special Retirement, and after such date may be exercised by the holder for a period of 12 months after the effective date of the Special Retirement or until the option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter. However, effective for options granted in or after 2008, the option will become 100% exercisable if at the time of termination, the officer has attained age 66 and the termination occurs subsequent to the year of grant.

        Resignation with Prior Consent of the Board. If the officer ceases to be employed by reason of the officer's resignation of employment at any age with the prior consent of the board of directors of TDS, the option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the effective date of the officer's resignation, and after such date may be exercised by the holder for a period of 90 days after such effective date or until the option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter.

58

        Death. If the officer ceases to be employed by reason of death, the option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the date of the officer's death, and after the date of death may be exercised by the beneficiary or beneficiaries duly designated by the deceased officer, for a period of 180 days after the date of death or until the option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter. However, effective for options granted in or after 2008, the option will be exercisable by the beneficiary or beneficiaries for a period of 180 days after the date of death.

        Other Termination of Employment or Service. If the officer ceases to be employed for any reason other than Disability, Retirement, Special Retirement, resignation of employment with the prior consent of the board of directors of TDS or death, the option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the effective date of the officer's termination of employment, and after such date may be exercised by the holder (or the holder's legal representative) for a period of 30 days after the effective date of the officer's termination of employment or until the option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter.

        Extension of Option Exercise Period. The option exercise period may be extended 30 days beyond the end of a blackout period or legally-required plan suspension in the event that the option would otherwise expire during a blackout period or legally-required plan suspension.

        Restricted Stock Unit Awards.    The TDS restricted stock unit agreements with named executive officers provide as follows:

        Disability or Death. If the officer separates from service prior to vesting by reason of Disability or death, the restricted stock unit award will vest upon such separation from service. The shares subject to the restricted stock unit award generally will be issued within sixty days following the officer's separation from service. However, if the officer separates from service by reason of Disability, and if the award is subject to section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, then the shares subject to the award will be issued in the seventh calendar month following the calendar month during which the officer separates from service.

        Retirement at or after Attainment of Age 66. If the officer separates from service after the calendar year in which the restricted stock unit award was granted but prior to vesting, by reason of retirement at or after attainment of age 66, the restricted stock unit will vest upon such separation from service. The shares subject to the restricted stock unit award will be issued within sixty days following the officer's separation from service unless the award is subject to section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. If the award is subject to section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the shares subject to the award will be issued in the seventh calendar month following the calendar month during which the officer separates from service. If the officer is age 66 or older but separates from service during the calendar year in which the restricted stock unit award was granted, or if the officer separates from service by reason of retirement prior to the attainment of age 66, the restricted stock unit will be forfeited.

        Other Separation from Service. If the officer separates from service prior to vesting for any reason other than Disability, death or retirement at or after attainment of age 66, the restricted stock unit award will be forfeited.

        Employer Match Awards.    If the officer separates from service with TDS or its affiliates by reason of Disability or death, all employer match awards within the officer's deferred compensation account shall become nonforfeitable upon such separation from service. If the officer separates from service with TDS or its affiliates for any other reason, any unvested employer match awards will be forfeited.

        Forfeiture of Award Upon Competition with or Misappropriation of Confidential Information of TDS or its Affiliates.    If a recipient of an award enters into competition with, or misappropriates confidential information of, TDS or any affiliate thereof, then all awards held by the recipient shall terminate and be forfeited.

        Notwithstanding any provision in the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan or any agreement, in the event of a Change in Control:

59

        The foregoing outlines the effect of a Change in Control relating to all potential awards available under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. However, TDS currently only has outstanding restricted stock units, options and phantom stock units related to deferred compensation accounts.

        The definition of Change in Control is set forth in Section 8.9(b) of TDS' 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan was filed with the SEC as Exhibit 10.1 to TDS' Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 11, 2005, and amendments to TDS' 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan were filed with the SEC as Exhibits to TDS' Current Reports on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2007 and December 22, 2008.

        Because certain termination events and/or a Change in Control would result in the acceleration of vesting of options, restricted stock units and bonus match awards, the effects of such accelerated vesting in such event are included in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan

        Mary N. Dillon does not participate in the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Instead, she participates in the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. For further information about the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, see the U.S. Cellular proxy statement for its 2011 annual meeting of shareholders. In addition, see the above description of the letter agreement between U.S. Cellular and Ms. Dillon dated May 3, 2010.

SERP

        Each of the identified officers participates in a supplemental executive retirement plan or SERP, which is a non-qualified defined contribution plan. The SERP is not intended to provide substantial benefits other than to replace the benefits which cannot be provided under the TDS Pension Plan as a result of tax law limitations on the amount and types of annual employee compensation which can be taken into account under a tax qualified pension plan. The SERP is unfunded. The amount of the SERP contribution with respect to the executives identified in the Summary Compensation Table is included in column (i), "All Other Compensation," of the Summary Compensation Table. Participants are credited with interest on balances of the SERP. Pursuant to SEC rules, column (h) of the Summary Compensation Table includes any portion of interest earned under the SERP to the extent the rate exceeds 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, with compounding (as prescribed under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code), at the time the rate is set.

        A participant is entitled to distribution of his entire account balance under the SERP if the participant has a separation from service without cause, after either (a) his or her attainment of age 65; or (b) his or her completion of at least ten years of service. If a participant has a separation from service under circumstances other than those set forth in the preceding sentence, without cause, the participant will be entitled to distribution of 10% of his or her account balance for each year of service up to ten years. Upon a separation from service under circumstances that permit payments under the SERP, the participant will be paid his or her account balance in one of the following forms as elected by the participant prior to the first day of the first plan year for which the participant commences participation in

60


the SERP: (a) a single lump sum or (b) annual installments over a period of 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 years. The SERP does not include any provision that would increase benefits or accelerate amounts upon any termination or change in control and, accordingly, no amount is included in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control. The balance of the SERP as of December 31, 2010 for each named executive officer is set forth below in the "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" Table.

Perquisites

        TDS does not provide any significant perquisites to its officers. See note (i) under "Explanation of Columns" under the Summary Compensation Table for information about perquisites to the named executive officers. In addition, TDS has no formal plan, policy or procedure pursuant to which executive officers are entitled to any perquisites following termination or change in control. However, in connection with any termination, TDS may enter into a retirement, severance or similar agreement that may provide for certain limited perquisites. Perquisites and personal benefits represent a relatively insignificant portion of the named executive officers' total compensation. Accordingly, they do not materially influence the Compensation Committee's consideration in setting compensation.

Other Generally Applicable Benefits and Plans

Employee Stock Purchase Plans

        TDS sponsors an Employee Stock Purchase Plan that permits eligible employees of TDS and its subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular, to purchase a limited number of TDS Special Common Shares on a quarterly basis. The per share cost to each participant is 85% of the market value of the Special Common Shares as of the quarterly purchase date. Pursuant to SEC rules, the Summary Compensation Table does not include the discount amount because such discount is available generally to all employees of TDS.

        U.S. Cellular also sponsors an Employee Stock Purchase Plan that permits eligible employees of U.S. Cellular and its subsidiaries to purchase a limited number of U.S. Cellular Common Shares on a quarterly basis. The per share cost to each participant is 85% of the market value of the Common Shares as of the quarterly purchase date. Pursuant to SEC rules, the Summary Compensation Table does not include the discount amount because such discount is available generally to all employees of U.S. Cellular.

        Under the TDS and U.S. Cellular Employee Stock Purchase Plans, all shares purchased are distributed quarterly and no shares are retained for distribution upon retirement or otherwise. These plans do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of executive officers and are available generally to all employees of TDS or U.S. Cellular, as applicable, and benefits are not enhanced upon any termination or change in control. Accordingly, no amounts are reported in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

Tax-Deferred Savings Plan

        TDS sponsors the Tax-Deferred Savings Plan (TDSP), a qualified defined contribution plan pursuant to Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. This plan is available to employees of TDS and participating employer subsidiaries of TDS which have adopted the TDSP, including U.S. Cellular. Employees contribute amounts from their compensation, and TDS and participating employers make matching contributions to the plan in cash equal to 100% of an employee's contributions up to the first 3% of such employee's compensation, and 40% of an employee's contributions up to the next 2% of such employee's compensation. Participating employees have the option of investing their contributions and their employer matching contributions in a TDS Common Share fund, a TDS Special Common Share fund, a U.S. Cellular Common Share fund and certain unaffiliated funds. The amount of the matching contribution with respect to the executives identified in the Summary Compensation Table is included in column (i), "All Other Compensation," of the Summary Compensation Table. SEC rules do not require the Summary Compensation Table to include earnings or other amounts with respect to tax-qualified defined contribution plans.

        Under the TDS Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, employees are always fully vested in their employee contributions, but are subject to a two year graduated vesting schedule (34% vesting at one year of

61


service and 100% vesting at two years of service) for employer matching contributions. Vesting in employer matching contributions is not accelerated upon a Change in Control or termination event, except a termination by reason of death, total and permanent disability, or after an employee attains age 65. The vested portion of an employee's account becomes payable following the employee's termination of employment as (a) a lump sum or (b) a series of annual or more frequent installments. This plan does not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of executive officers and is available generally to all employees, and benefits are not enhanced upon any termination (other than a termination by reason of death, total and permanent disability or after an employee attains age 65) or Change in Control. Accordingly, no amounts are reported in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

Pension Plan

        TDS sponsors a qualified noncontributory defined contribution Pension Plan for the employees of TDS and its subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular. Under this plan, pension costs are calculated separately for each participant and are funded annually. The Pension Plan is designed to provide retirement benefits for eligible employees of TDS and participating employer subsidiaries which have adopted the Pension Plan. TDS and its participating subsidiaries make annual employer contributions for each eligible participant based on the applicable pension formula. The amount of the contribution with respect to the executives identified in the Summary Compensation Table is included in column (i), "All Other Compensation," of the Summary Compensation Table. SEC rules do not require the Summary Compensation Table to include earnings or other amounts with respect to tax-qualified defined contribution plans.

        Benefits under the TDS Pension Plan are subject to a five year graduated vesting schedule (20% vesting at two years of service, 40% vesting at three years of service, 60% vesting at four years of service and 100% vesting at five years of service). Vesting is not accelerated upon a Change in Control or termination event, except a termination of employment due to a total and permanent disability or after the employee has attained his or her Early or Normal Retirement Date as defined in the Plan. The vested portion of an employee's account becomes payable following the employee's termination of employment as (a) an annuity or (b) a lump sum payment. This plan does not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of executive officers and is available generally to all employees, and benefits are not enhanced upon any termination (except due to a total and permanent disability or after the employee has attained his or her Early or Normal Retirement Date) or change in control. Accordingly, no amounts are reported in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

Retiree Welfare Benefits

        TDS sponsors retiree medical and life insurance plans for eligible retirees of TDS and participating employer subsidiaries of TDS which have adopted the plans. Eligible retirees are required to pay a portion or, in certain cases, all of the premiums for the insurance coverage dependent upon the employee's hire date and employer at the time of termination of employment. These plans do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of executive officers and are available generally to all employees of participating employers, and benefits are not enhanced upon any termination or change in control. Accordingly, no amounts are reported in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

Welfare Benefits during Employment

        TDS also provides customary health and welfare and similar plans for the benefit of its employees. These group life, health, hospitalization, disability and/or medical reimbursement plans do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of executive officers and are available generally to all employees, and benefits are not enhanced upon any termination or change in control. Accordingly, no amounts are reported in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatments of Particular Forms of Compensation

        The Compensation Committee considers the accounting and tax treatments of particular forms of compensation. Accounting treatments do not significantly impact the Compensation Committee's

62


determinations of the appropriate compensation. The Compensation Committee considers the accounting treatments primarily to be informed and to confirm that company personnel understand and recognize the appropriate accounting that will be required with respect to compensation decisions.

        The Compensation Committee places more significance on the tax treatments of particular forms of compensation, because these may involve an actual cash expense to the company or the executive. One objective of the Compensation Committee is to maximize tax benefits to the company and executives to the extent feasible within the overall goals of the compensation policy discussed above. In particular, one consideration is the effect of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

        Subject to certain exceptions, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code provides a one million dollar annual limit on the amount that a publicly held corporation is allowed to deduct as compensation paid to each of the corporation's principal executive officer ("PEO") and the corporation's three most highly compensated officers, exclusive of the corporation's PEO and principal financial officer. TDS does not believe that the one million dollar deduction limitation currently has or should have in the near future a material adverse effect on TDS' financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. If the one million dollar deduction limitation is expected to have a material adverse effect on TDS in the future, TDS will consider ways to maximize the deductibility of executive compensation, while retaining the discretion TDS deems necessary to compensate executive officers in a manner commensurate with performance and the competitive environment for executive talent.

        TDS does not have any arrangements with its executive officers pursuant to which it has agreed to "gross-up" payments due to taxes or to otherwise reimburse officers for the payment of taxes, except with respect to certain perquisites as noted below.

Clawback

        Depending on the facts and circumstances, TDS may seek to adjust or recover awards or payments if the relevant TDS performance measures upon which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of an award or payment. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, TDS will be required to adopt a formal clawback policy that satisfies SEC and NYSE requirements. This will be done later in 2011 after the SEC and NYSE issue rules relating to this requirement.

TDS Policy on Stock Ownership

        TDS does not have a formal policy relating to stock ownership by executive officers. However, because the President and CEO and the Executive Vice President and CFO are also directors of TDS, they are subject to the stock ownership guidelines applicable to directors. See "Corporate Governance—Stock Ownership Guidelines" above. In addition, it should be noted that the President and CEO of TDS is a substantial shareholder of TDS. See "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" below.

        TDS' Policy Regarding Insider Trading and Confidentiality provides that persons subject to the blackout policy may not, under any circumstances, trade options for, pledge, or sell "short," any securities of TDS or U.S. Cellular, and may not enter into any hedging, monetization or margin transactions with respect to any such securities.

Forward Looking Statements

        The foregoing discussion includes statements of judgment and forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our business, compensation, management's beliefs, and certain assumptions made by us, all of which are subject to change. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "predicts," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "may," "will," "should," "would," "could," "potential," "continue," "ongoing," similar expressions, and variations or negatives of these words and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding projected performance and compensation. Actual results could differ significantly from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, the risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. We assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements.

63


 Compensation Committee Report

        The Compensation Committee of the board of directors of TDS oversees TDS' compensation program on behalf of the board of directors. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above in this Proxy Statement.

        In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in TDS' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and TDS' Proxy Statement related to the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

        This Compensation Committee Report is submitted by Christopher D. O'Leary, George W. Off, Gary L. Sugarman and Herbert S. Wander.


Risks from Compensation Policies and Practices

        TDS does not believe that risks arising from TDS' compensation policies and practices for its employees, including non-executive officers, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS. The following describes the process undertaken to reach the conclusion, and the basis for the conclusion, that TDS' compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS.

        In 2010 and 2011, representatives of TDS took the following steps: Various elements of compensation (including plans and arrangements) provided to executive officers, non-executive officers and all other employees were identified and cataloged. The potential risks associated with each element of compensation were identified and evaluated for materiality and likelihood. Controls and potential mitigating factors were then identified and evaluated. Based on this process, documentation was prepared which maps and identifies TDS' various compensation elements, describes their characteristics and purposes, identifies potential risks associated with each compensation element, and then describes controls and mitigating factors. This documentation was used to evaluate the potential risks of the various elements of compensation, which are summarized below.

        In addition, TDS considered the following processes and matters. TDS has internal controls in place and has processes to identify deficiencies, including significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. These processes have not identified any compensation policies or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS. TDS also has an Enterprise Risk Management process that has not identified any compensation policies or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS. In addition, in connection with its process to review and identify risks for its Annual Report on Form 10-K, TDS did not identify any compensation policies or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS. Furthermore, TDS has not had any incident in which TDS' compensation policies and practices have resulted in a material adverse effect on TDS. Although TDS' compensation policies and practices have evolved over time, their risk characteristics have not changed in any material respect for several years. TDS does not believe that its compensation policies and practices are unusual in any significant respect and believes that they are comparable in many respects with those of many other commercial public companies. TDS' compensation policies and practices have been developed over time with the assistance of its nationally-recognized compensation consultant, Tower Watson. Such policies and practices also have been reviewed by the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant, Compensation Strategies.

        TDS believes that its policies and practices of compensating its employees, including non-executive officers, as they relate to risk management practices and risk-taking incentives, involve less risk than its compensation policies and practices relating to executive officers, as discussed in the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis. As discussed therein, TDS does not believe that its compensation policies and practices relating to executive officers are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS. To an even greater extent, TDS does not believe that its compensation policies and practices relating to its employees, including non-executive officers, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS, for the reasons discussed below.

64

        As a telecommunications company, TDS faces general business risks similar to many other businesses and certain other risks specific to a telecommunications business (as disclosed in TDS' most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K). Both of TDS' principal business units, U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom, are telecommunications companies, and TDS does not have any business units that have significantly different risk profiles from TDS' risk profile (such as a business unit involved in finance, securities, investing, speculation or similar activities), or where compensation expense is a dominant percentage of the business unit's revenues or with a risk and reward structure that varies significantly from the overall risk and reward structure of TDS. In general, TDS and both of its principal business units have similar compensation policies and practices.

        The general design philosophy of the compensation policies and practices for employees of TDS and its business units is similar to the design philosophy discussed with respect to executive officers in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above. In addition to such executive officers, the employees whose behavior would be most affected by the incentives established by such policies and practices are the non-executive officers and director-level employees of TDS and each of its principal business units.

        Similar to the compensation of executive officers, non-executive officers and director-level employees are compensated using a mix of short and long-term compensation. Each such employee receives a substantial portion of compensation in the form of a fixed salary, which does not encourage any risk taking, and may receive a portion of compensation as long-term incentive compensation, which discourages short-term risk taking.

        A portion of the long-term incentive compensation of such employees may include restricted stock units, which retain value even if stock prices decline to some degree. As a result, as long as the stock continues to have some value, such awards will not expire without value and, as a result, do not encourage risk taking to attempt to avoid having awards expire without value, as could occur with stock options. Although such employees may also receive stock options, multi-year vesting and an exercise period that is generally ten years reduce the potential for excessive risk taking and, in any event, options are only one of several elements of compensation.

        Although employees, including non-executive officers, may be entitled to an annual bonus that relates to annual company performance, such bonuses are limited and represent only a portion of compensation. Also, such compensation is not designed to compensate non-executive employees for results that might be achieved by taking significant risks because non-executive employees do not have the authority to take significant risks, as compared to executive officers. In particular, non-executive employees have specified and limited authority compared to executive officers. In addition, TDS and its business units are subject to an authorization policy that requires various levels of approvals for employees to take action depending on the dollar amount involved, and internal controls, procedures and processes to monitor and review such actions. Under such policy, actions that could have a material effect on TDS would need to be approved by the board of directors and/or one or more executive officers of TDS and/or such business units. TDS compensation policies and practices relating to non-executive employees are not designed to provide incentives to such employees to take action which they have no authority to take. In addition, there is a significant amount of discretion in awarding bonuses as well as other compensation and, as a result, such compensation could be reduced, or not awarded or not increased, if an employee undertook unauthorized risk. Also, depending on the facts and circumstances, TDS may seek to adjust or recover awards or payments if the relevant performance measures upon which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of an award or payment.

        As a result, considering the foregoing, TDS does not believe that its compensation policies and practices for employees, including non-executive officers, provide incentives to such employees to undertake risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TDS.

65


 Compensation Tables

Summary of Compensation

        The following table summarizes the compensation earned by the named executive officer in 2010 and, except as indicated, 2009 and 2008.


Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal
Position (a)
  Year
(b) 		  Salary
($) (c) 		  Bonus
($) (d) 		  Stock
Awards
($) (e) 		  Option
Awards
($) (f) 		  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($) (g) 		  Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($) (h) 		  All Other
Compensation
($) (i) 		  Total
($) (j) 		 

LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.

                                                        
 

(1)(6)(7)

     2010   $ 1,313,300   $ 875,000   $ 985,846   $ 2,091,375   $ —   $ 5,724   $ 78,791   $ 5,350,036  
 

President and Chief

     2009   $ 1,275,000   $ 1,480,000   $ 1,133,313   $ 2,342,475   $ —   $ 9,722   $ 75,581   $ 6,316,091  
 

Executive Officer

     2008   $ 1,275,000   $ 950,000   $ 1,192,807   $ 2,003,618   $ —   $ 1,438   $ 80,007   $ 5,502,870  

Kenneth R. Meyers

                                                        
 

(2)(6)(7)

     2010   $ 632,500   $ 256,416   $ 454,932   $ 1,108,428   $ 97,484   $ 7,556   $ 74,125   $ 2,631,441  
 

Executive Vice

     2009   $ 614,000   $ 583,643   $ 495,532   $ 1,242,280   $ 80,557   $ 10,428   $ 74,273   $ 3,100,713  
 

President and Chief

     2008   $ 595,000   $ 356,000   $ 497,637   $ 822,950   $ —   $ 1,516   $ 67,916   $ 2,341,019  
 

Financial Officer

                                                        

Mary N. Dillon

                                                        
 

(3)(6)(7)

     2010   $ 422,917   $ 580,000   $ 1,836,450   $ 2,647,736     —   $ 284   $ 469,467   $ 5,956,854  
 

President and Chief

                                                        
 

Executive Officer

                                                        
 

of U.S. Cellular

                                                        

Scott H. Williamson

                                                        
 

(4)(7)

     2010   $ 594,500   $ 170,961   $ 298,730   $ 762,934   $ 64,139   $ 5,379   $ 68,857   $ 1,965,500  
 

Senior Vice

     2009   $ 583,000   $ 439,757   $ 333,884   $ 870,748   $ 53,543   $ 9,061   $ 65,077   $ 2,355,070  
 

President—Acquisitions

     2008   $ 565,000   $ 277,000   $ 350,106   $ 606,152   $ —   $ 1,309   $ 70,701   $ 1,870,268  
 

and Corporate

                                                        
 

Development

                                                        

David A. Wittwer

                                                        
 

(5)(7)

     2010   $ 513,000   $ 297,500   $ 311,497   $ 776,318   $ —   $ 11,851   $ 32,721   $ 1,942,887  
 

President and Chief

     2009   $ 496,000   $ 464,100   $ —   $ 859,227   $ —   $ 12,929   $ 31,596   $ 1,863,852  
 

Executive Officer

                                                        
 

of TDS Telecom

                                                        

Explanation of Columns:

(a)
Includes the following "named executive officers": all individuals serving as TDS' principal executive officer or acting in a similar capacity during the last completed fiscal year; all individuals serving as the principal financial officer or acting in a similar capacity during the last completed fiscal year; and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the foregoing who were serving as executive officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year, including executive officers of subsidiaries. The determination as to which executive officers are most highly compensated is made by reference to total compensation for the last completed fiscal year as set forth in column (j), reduced by any amount in column (h).

(b)
For additional details relating to 2009, see the TDS Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on Schedule 14A on April 23, 2010. For additional details relating to 2008, see the TDS Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on Schedule 14A on April 28, 2009.

(c)
Represents the dollar value of base salary (cash and non-cash) earned by the named executive officer during the fiscal year, whether or not paid in such year. Kenneth R. Meyers and Mary N. Dillon deferred a portion of their 2010 base salaries, all of which salary is included in column (c) whether or not deferred. See "Information Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" below. The other officers did not defer any base salary in 2010.

(d)
Represents the dollar value of bonus (cash and non-cash) earned by the named executive officer during the fiscal year, whether or not paid in such year. As discussed above, as a result of amendments to TDS' bonus guidelines and procedure, 2009 bonus includes both the bonus relating to 2008 performance that was paid in 2009 pursuant to the prior guidelines and the bonus relating to 2009 performance that was paid in 2010 pursuant to the amended guidelines.

LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., deferred 15% of his 2009 bonus paid in 2010. Kenneth R. Meyers deferred 25% of his 2009 bonus paid in 2010. The amount deferred is deemed invested in phantom stock units in TDS Special Common Shares for TDS officers or in USM Common Shares for U.S. Cellular officers. See "Grants of Plan-Based Awards" below. The entire amount of bonus, including any amount deferred, is included in the Summary Compensation Table above. See "Information Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" below.

66

   
   LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. 		  Kenneth R.
Meyers 		  Scott H.
Williamson 		  David A.
Wittwer 		 
 

Total 2009 Bonus Paid in 2010

   $ 825,000   $ 334,300   $ 233,800   $ 185,500  
 

Percentage Deferred

     15 %   25 %   —     —  
                     
 

Amount Deferred

   $ 123,750   $ 83,575   $ —   $ —  
                     
   

Number of Underlying TDS.S Shares

     4,309     2,910     —     —  
                     
 

Company Match—see Note (e)

   $ 30,931   $ 20,879   $ —   $ —  
                     
   

Number of Underlying TDS.S Shares

     1,077     727     —     —  
                     
(e)
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. In the case of restricted stock units, such value is reduced by the estimated value of the discounted cash flows of dividends that would normally be received with respect to such shares (because restricted stock units do not receive credit for dividends prior to vesting). The vesting period of the awards granted in 2010 is set forth under "Grants of Plan-Based Awards" below. Assumptions made in the valuation of the stock awards in this column are incorporated by reference from Note 16—Stock Based Compensation in TDS' financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Includes the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 relating to restricted stock units in TDS Special Common Shares under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan and/or relating to restricted stock units in USM Common Shares under the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. See "Information Regarding Plan-Based Awards" below for vesting and other information. The restricted stock units granted to Mary N. Dillon vest as set forth in a letter agreement dated May 3, 2010 between U.S. Cellular and Mary N. Dillon, as described in the footnotes to the Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

Also, as noted in note (d) above, includes the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 relating to phantom stock bonus match units awarded to such officer in 2010 with respect to deferred bonus compensation. TDS deferred bonus is deemed invested in phantom TDS Special Common Shares and U.S. Cellular deferred bonus is deemed invested in phantom USM Common Shares. The TDS phantom stock units are credited with dividend equivalents. The Summary Compensation Table does not include any dividends (or dividend equivalents) on deferred bonus denominated in phantom TDS stock because such dividends are not preferential under SEC rules, because they are not earned at a rate higher than dividends on TDS' common stock. U.S. Cellular does not currently pay dividends. For information relating to U.S. Cellular, see U.S. Cellular's proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting.

As noted above, LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., and Kenneth R. Meyers deferred part of their 2009 bonus which was paid in 2010 and, accordingly, received a stock unit match in phantom TDS Special Common Shares in 2010. Column (e) above includes the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 related to awards in 2010. See "Information Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" below.

For reference purposes, the following is a summary of the grant date value of stock awards in 2010 reflected in column (l) of the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below that is included in column (e) in the above Summary Compensation Table:

   
   LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. 		  Kenneth R.
Meyers 		  Mary N.
Dillon 		  Scott H.
Williamson 		  David A.
Wittwer 		 
 

TDS:

                                
 

2010 TDS.S Restricted Stock Unit Award

   $ 954,915   $ 434,053   $ —   $ 298,730   $ 311,497  
 

TDS.S Match Awards for 2009 Bonus paid in 2010

     30,931     20,879     —     —     —  
 

USM:

                                
 

2010 USM Restricted Stock Unit Award

     —     —     1,836,450     —     —  
 

USM Match Awards for 2009 Bonus paid in 2010

     —     —     —     —     —  
                         
   

Total

   $ 985,846   $ 454,932   $ 1,836,450   $ 298,730   $ 311,497  
                         
(f)
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The dates on which the options granted in 2010 become exercisable and expire are set forth below under "Grants of Plan-Based Awards." Assumptions made in the valuation of the option awards in this column are incorporated by reference from Note 16—Stock Based Compensation, in TDS' financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Options granted in 2010 to the named executive officers other than Ms. Dillon become exercisable with respect to one-third of the number of shares subject to the option on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. Options granted in 2010 to Ms. Dillon become exercisable as set forth in a letter agreement dated May 3, 2010 between U.S. Cellular and Ms. Dillon, as described in the footnotes to the Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

67

(g)
Represents the portion of the bonus that represents non-equity incentive plan compensation pursuant to SEC rules. See the discussion under "Bonus" in the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

(h)
As required by SEC rules, column (h) includes the portion of interest that exceeded 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate ("AFR"), with compounding (as prescribed under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code), at the time each annual interest rate is set. Each of the identified officers participates in a supplemental executive retirement plan or SERP, except that Ms. Dillon did not begin to participate until 2011. The interest rate for 2010 was set as of the last trading date of 2009 at 6.36% per annum, based on the yield on ten year BBB rated industrial bonds at such time. Such rate exceeded the AFR of 5.02% at such time. Accordingly, pursuant to SEC rules, column (h) of the Summary Compensation Table for 2010 includes the portion of such interest that exceeded the AFR at the time the interest rate was set. In addition, column (h) includes interest that Ms. Dillon and Mr. Meyers received from U.S. Cellular (in the case of Mr. Meyers, as a result of deferred salary during Mr. Meyers' employment by U.S. Cellular prior to 2007) and that Mr. Meyers and Mr. Wittwer received from TDS (including TDS Telecom), on deferred salary that exceeds the AFR, as indicated in the below table. The other officers have not deferred any of their salaries. Interest on deferred salary is compounded monthly, computed at a rate equal to one-twelfth of the sum of the average thirty-year Treasury Bond rate for salary deferred as an employee of TDS, or the twenty-year Treasury Bond rate for salary deferred as an employee of U.S. Cellular, plus 1.25 percentage points.

   
   LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. 		  Kenneth R.
Meyers 		  Mary N.
Dillon 		  Scott H.
Williamson 		  David A.
Wittwer 		 
 

Excess Earnings

                                
   

SERP

   $ 5,724   $ 5,626   $ —   $ 5,379   $ 1,757  
   

TDS Deferred Salary

     —     1,645     —     —     10,094  
   

USM Deferred Salary

     —     285     284     —     —  
                         
 

Total Excess Earnings

   $ 5,724   $ 7,556   $ 284   $ 5,379   $ 11,851  
                         
(i)
Includes a one-time payment of $450,000 to Mary N. Dillon on the three month anniversary of her date of employment pursuant to the terms of the letter agreement dated May 3, 2010 between U.S. Cellular and Ms. Dillon relating to her employment.

Does not include any discount amount under the TDS dividend reinvestment plans because such discounts are available generally to all security holders of TDS.

Does not include any discount amount under the TDS or U.S. Cellular employee stock purchase plans because such discounts are available generally to all employees of TDS or U.S. Cellular, as applicable. The per share cost to each participant is 85% of the market value of the TDS Special Common Shares or USM Common Shares as of the issuance date, as applicable.

Does not include perquisites and other personal benefits, or property, unless the aggregate amount of such compensation is $10,000 or more. Perquisites do not include expenditures that are used exclusively for business purposes.

Includes the following: (1) if applicable, the total of perquisites and personal benefits if they equal or exceed $10,000, summarized by type, or specified for any perquisite or personal benefit that exceeds the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits for each officer, in each case, valued on the basis of the aggregate incremental cost of such perquisite or personal benefit to TDS, including any related tax gross up (if the total amount is less than $10,000, the following indicates "N/A"), (2) contributions by TDS for the benefit of the named executive officer under (a) the TDS Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, which is referred to as the TDSP, (b) the TDS Pension Plan and (c) the TDS supplemental executive retirement plan, which is

68

   
   LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. 		  Kenneth R.
Meyers 		  Mary N.
Dillon 		  Scott H.
Williamson 		  David A.
Wittwer 		 
 

Perquisites:

                                
   

Corporate automobile allowance and other personal travel and related expenses

   $ 17,490   $ 12,530   $ 6,057   $ 10,584     N/A  
   

Tax gross up relating to corporate automobile allowance

     2,860     3,161     2,528     4,047     N/A  
   

Reimbursement of legal fees for negotiation of terms of employment

     —     —     10,882     —     N/A  
   

Other (Club Dues and Health and Fitness reimbursements)

     —     —     —     1,202     N/A  
                         
 

Total Perquisites if $10,000 or more

   $ 20,350   $ 15,691   $ 19,467   $ 15,833     N/A  
 

One Time Payment

  
$
—		  
$
—		  
$
450,000		  
$
—		  
$
—		  
 

Contributions to Benefit Plans

                                
   

TDSP

   $ 9,317   $ 9,310   $ —   $ 4,024   $ 9,310  
   

Pension Plan

     43,128     11,496     —     24,291     11,411  
   

SERP

     5,872     37,504     —     24,709     12,000  
   

Life Insurance

     124     124     —     —     —  
                         
 

Total, including perquisites if $10,000 or more

   $ 78,791   $ 74,125   $ 469,467   $ 68,857   $ 32,721  
                         
(j)
Represents the dollar value of total compensation for the fiscal year based on the sum of all amounts reported in columns (c) through (i). See the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of the proportions of each of the compensation elements to total compensation.

Footnotes:

(1)
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., as President and Chief Executive Officer of TDS, is included in the above table as TDS' principal executive officer. He is also Chairman of U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom. TDS does not have any employment, severance or similar agreement with LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. Mr. Carlson is the son of Chairman Emeritus, LeRoy T. Carlson, and the brother of non-executive Chairman of the Board and director, Walter C.D. Carlson, director, Letitia G. Carlson, M.D., and director, Prudence E. Carlson.

(2)
Kenneth R. Meyers is included in the above table because he is TDS' principal financial officer. TDS does not have any employment, severance or similar agreement with Kenneth R. Meyers.

(3)
Mary N. Dillon, as President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Cellular, a principal business unit of TDS which operates wireless telephone companies, is deemed to be an executive officer of TDS under SEC rules. She is one of the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer or principal financial officer who was serving as an executive officer at the end of the last completed fiscal year, including executive officers of subsidiaries. U.S. Cellular is party to a letter agreement dated May 3, 2010 relating to her employment as President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Cellular, as discussed in the footnotes to the Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control. All of Ms. Dillon's compensation is paid by U.S. Cellular, which is a public company and an SEC registrant. Further information about Ms. Dillon's

69

(4)
Scott H. Williamson, Senior Vice President—Acquisitions and Corporate Development of TDS, is one of the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer or principal financial officer of TDS who was serving as an executive officer at the end of the last completed fiscal year, including executive officers of subsidiaries. TDS does not have any employment, severance or similar agreement with Scott H. Williamson.

(5)
David A. Wittwer, President and Chief Executive Officer of TDS Telecom, is one of the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer or principal financial officer of TDS who was serving as an executive officer at the end of the last completed fiscal year, including executive officers of subsidiaries. Only his 2009 and 2010 compensation is reported because he was not a named executive officer prior to 2009 because he was not one of the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer or principal financial officer in years prior to 2009. TDS does not have any employment, severance or similar agreement with David A. Wittwer.

(6)
Each of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Kenneth R. Meyers and Mary N. Dillon is also an executive officer and/or director of U.S. Cellular. Mary N. Dillon receives all of her compensation from U.S. Cellular. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., director and Chairman of U.S. Cellular, and Kenneth R. Meyers, director and Chief Accounting Officer of U.S. Cellular, did not receive any compensation from U.S. Cellular in 2010. In 2010, LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., and Kenneth R. Meyers were compensated by TDS in connection with their services for TDS and TDS subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular. A portion of their compensation expense incurred by TDS is allocated to U.S. Cellular by TDS, along with the allocation of other compensation expense and other expenses of TDS. This allocation by TDS to U.S. Cellular is done in the form of a single management fee pursuant to an Intercompany Agreement between TDS and U.S. Cellular. There is no identification or quantification of the compensation of such persons to U.S. Cellular, or of any other allocated expense in this management fee. The management fee is recorded as a single expense by U.S. Cellular, U.S. Cellular does not obtain details of the components that make up this fee and does not segregate this fee or allocate any part of the management fee to other accounts such as compensation expense. All of the compensation of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. and Kenneth R. Meyers was approved by the TDS Compensation Committee and none of it was subject to approval by any U.S. Cellular directors or officers. Accordingly, all of such compensation expense incurred by TDS is reported in the above table by TDS and is not reported by U.S. Cellular. U.S. Cellular discloses the amount of the management fee that it pays to TDS in its proxy statement together with a description of the Intercompany Agreement.

(7)
Effective January 1, 2009, TDS amended its guidelines and procedures for awarding bonuses. Prior to such amendments, such guidelines provided that bonuses were not earned until the date the bonus was paid. Effective for 2009 and subsequent years, the foregoing guidelines and procedures were amended to provide that, to the extent and only to the extent that any bonus is paid for a performance year, such bonus shall be deemed to have been earned on December 31 of that performance year.

As a result of such amendments, with respect to the 2009 bonus, the above Summary Compensation Table includes both the bonus relating to 2008 performance that was paid in 2009 pursuant to the prior guidelines and procedures, and the bonus relating to 2009 performance that was paid in 2010 pursuant to the amended guidelines and procedures. The 2010 bonus includes only the bonus paid in 2011 relating to 2010 performance. The 2008 bonus includes only the bonus paid in 2008 relating to 2007 performance.

In addition to the foregoing change, the above Summary Compensation Table includes certain changes in the columns in which bonus is reported as required by SEC rules. With respect to the bonus relating to 2008 and prior years, because the bonus amount was entirely discretionary and not deemed to be earned unless and until paid, the entire amount of the bonus is reported under the "Bonus" column. However, certain amounts of the bonus relating to performance in 2009 and paid in 2010 and certain amounts of the bonus relating to performance in 2010 and paid in 2011 for certain officers are required to be included under the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column. The portion of the bonus paid in 2010 based on 2009 performance and of the bonus paid in 2011 based on 2010 performance that is included in the column captioned "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" is the amount of the bonus calculated based on company performance excluding any discretionary adjustment to such bonus and excluding any discretionary bonus based on individual performance. See the discussion under "Bonus" in the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis for how this is calculated with respect to the bonus relating to performance in 2010 that was paid in 2011. The bonus amounts that are not included in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column are included in the "Bonus" column.

The following summarizes the bonus amounts in 2009 (the following does not include Mary N. Dillon because she did not begin service until June 1, 2010 and accordingly did not receive a 2009 bonus):

   
   LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. 		  Kenneth R.
Meyers 		  Scott H.
Williamson 		  David A.
Wittwer 		 
 

Bonus paid in 2010 for 2009 Performance

   $ 825,000   $ 334,300   $ 233,800   $ 185,500  
 

Bonus paid in 2009 for 2008 Performance

     655,000     329,900     259,500     278,600  
                     
 

Subtotal

     1,480,000     664,200     493,300     464,100  
 

Less 2010 payment reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation for 2009

     —     (80,557 )   (53,543 )   —  
                     
 

Total Amount reported as Bonus for 2009

   $ 1,480,000   $ 583,643   $ 439,757   $ 464,100  
                     

70

   
   LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. 		  Kenneth R.
Meyers 		  Mary N.
Dillon 		  Scott H.
Williamson 		  David A.
Wittwer 		 
 

Bonus paid in 2011 for 2010 Performance

   $ 875,000   $ 353,900   $ 580,000   $ 235,100   $ 297,500  
 

Less amount reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

     —     (97,484 )   —     (64,139 )   —  
                         
 

Total Amount reported as Bonus for 2010

   $ 875,000   $ 256,416   $ 580,000   $ 170,961   $ 297,500  
                         

71

Information Regarding Plan-Based Awards

        The following table shows, as to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table, certain information regarding plan-based awards in 2010.


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 
    
    
    
    
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
(i) 		  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
(j) 		   
    
  
 
    
   Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards   Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(k) 		  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
(l) 		 
Name
(a) 		  Grant
Date
(b) 		  Threshold
(c) 		  Target
(d) 		  Maximum
(e) 		 

LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.

                                                  

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

    
—		    
—		    
—		    
—		                          

Awards in TDS.S Shares (2)

                                                  
   

TDS.S Restricted Stock Units

    
5/25/10		                      
37,400		              
$
954,915		  
   

TDS.S Phantom Stock Match Units for 2009 Bonus paid in 2010 (4)

     3/1/10                       1,077               $ 30,931  
                                                 

Total Grant Date Value of Stock Awards

                                             $ 985,846  
   

TDS.S Options

    
5/25/10		                            
250,000		  
$
26.66		  
$
2,091,375		  
                                                 

Total Grant Date Value of all Awards

                                             $ 3,077,221  
                                                 

Kenneth R. Meyers

                                                  

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

    
1/1/10		  
$
—		  
$
142,313		  
$
284,626		                          

Awards in TDS.S Shares (2)

                                                  
   

TDS.S Restricted Stock Units

    
5/25/10		                      
17,000		              
$
434,053		  
   

TDS.S Phantom Stock Match Units for 2009 Bonus paid in 2010 (4)

     3/1/10                       727               $ 20,879  
                                                 

Total Grant Date Value of Stock Awards

                                             $ 454,932  
   

TDS.S Options

     5/25/10                             132,500   $ 26.66   $ 1,108,428  
                                                 

Total Grant Date Value of all Awards

                                             $ 1,563,360  
                                                 

Mary N. Dillon

                                                  

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

    
—		    
—		    
—		    
—		                          

Awards in USM Common Shares (3)

                                                  
   

Initial CEO USM Restricted Stock Units (with accelerated vesting)

    
6/1/10		                      
20,000		              
$
816,200		  
   

Initial CEO USM Restricted Stock Units (without accelerated vesting)

     6/1/10                       25,000                 1,020,250  
                                                 

Total Grant Date Value of Stock Awards

                                             $ 1,836,450  
                                                 
   

Initial CEO USM Options (with accelerated vesting)

     6/1/10                             75,000   $ 40.81   $ 1,509,227  
   

Initial CEO USM Options (without accelerated vesting)

     6/1/10                             75,000   $ 40.81     1,138,509  
                                                 

Total Grant Date Value of Option Awards

                                              
2,647,736		  
                                                 

Total Grant Date Value of all Awards

                                             $ 4,484,186  
                                                 

Scott H. Williamson

                                                  

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

    
1/1/10		  
$
—		  
$
93,634		  
$
187,268		                          

Awards in TDS.S Shares (2)

                                                  
   

TDS.S Restricted Stock Units

    
5/25/10		                      
11,700		              
$
298,730		  
   

TDS.S Options

     5/25/10                             91,200   $ 26.66   $ 762,934  
                                                 

Total Grant Date Value of All Awards

                                             $ 1,061,664  
                                                 

72

 
    
    
    
    
   All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
(i) 		  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
(j) 		   
    
  
 
    
   Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards   Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(k) 		  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
(l) 		 
Name
(a) 		  Grant
Date
(b) 		  Threshold
(c) 		  Target
(d) 		  Maximum
(e) 		 

David A. Wittwer

                                                  

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

    
—		    
—		    
—		    
—		                          

Awards in TDS.S Shares (2)

                                                  
   

TDS.S Restricted Stock Units

    
5/25/10		                      
12,200		              
$
311,497		  
   

TDS.S Options

     5/25/10                             92,800   $ 26.66   $ 776,318  
                                                 

Total Grant Date Value of all Awards

                                             $ 1,087,815  
                                                 


Explanation of Columns:

(a)
 
Includes the persons identified in the Summary Compensation Table.

(b)
 
Represents the date on which the Compensation Committee, or in the case of Ms. Dillon, the U.S. Cellular Long-Term Incentive Compensation Committee, took action or was deemed to take action to grant the awards.

(c)—(e)
 
These columns as set forth in SEC rules relate to non-equity incentive plan awards, as defined by SEC rules. See Note (1) below.

(f)—(h)
 
These columns as set forth in SEC rules are not applicable because the identified officers did not receive any equity incentive plan awards, as defined by SEC rules. Accordingly, such columns are not included above.

(i)
 
Except with respect to Mary N. Dillon, includes the number of TDS Special Common Shares underlying restricted stock units awarded pursuant to the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The TDS.S restricted stock units will become vested on December 15, 2012. With respect to Ms. Dillon, includes the number of USM Common Shares underlying restricted stock units granted to Ms. Dillon pursuant to the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as specified in a letter agreement between U.S. Cellular and Ms. Dillon dated May 3, 2010. The RSUs with respect to 20,000 USM Common Shares become vested on June 1, 2013 (subject to continued employment) but have accelerated vesting in the event Ms. Dillon's employment terminates without cause or for good reason on or prior to June 1, 2012. The RSUs with respect to 25,000 USM Common Shares become vested on June 1, 2016 (subject to continued employment) and do not have accelerated vesting in the event of Ms. Dillon's termination of employment without cause or for good reason. Ms. Dillon's letter agreement is further discussed below in Note 2 under Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Changes in Control.

 
 
Under the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, executives (other than Mary N. Dillon) may elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of their annual bonuses up to $400,000 and to receive stock unit matches on the amount deferred. Deferred compensation is deemed invested in phantom TDS Special Common Shares. Participants receive (i) a 25% stock unit match for amounts deferred up to 50% of their total annual bonus and (ii) a 33% match for amounts deferred that exceed 50% of their total annual bonus. The matched stock units vest ratably at a rate of one-third per year over three years. The value of phantom stock bonus match units with respect to such officer is included in column (e), "Stock Awards," of the above Summary Compensation Table. After vesting, the matched stock units are credited with dividends. The Summary Compensation Table does not include any dividends (or dividend equivalents) on deferred bonus denominated in phantom TDS stock because such dividends are not preferential under SEC rules, because they are not earned at a rate higher than dividends on TDS' common stock. Any deferred bonus by Mary N. Dillon will be deemed invested in phantom USM Common Shares. U.S. Cellular does not currently pay dividends. For information relating to similar provisions under the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan applicable to the bonus deferral of Mary N. Dillon, see U.S. Cellular's proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting.

(j)
 
Except with respect to Mary N. Dillon, represents the number of TDS Special Common Shares underlying options awarded during the year pursuant to the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The TDS.S options granted on May 25, 2010 have an exercise price of $26.66 per share, which was the closing price of a TDS Special Common Share on May 25, 2010, become exercisable with respect to one-third of the number of shares subject to the option on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date and are exercisable until May 24, 2020.

 
 
In the case of Ms. Dillon, represents the number of USM Common Shares underlying options awarded during the fiscal year pursuant to the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as specified in a letter agreement between U.S. Cellular and Ms. Dillon dated May 3, 2010. The USM options were granted on June 1, 2010 at an exercise price of $40.81 per share, which was the closing price of a USM Common Share on June 1, 2010. Options for 75,000 USM Common Shares become exercisable with respect to one-third of the number of shares subject thereto on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date (subject to continued employment) and are subject to accelerated vesting in the event Ms. Dillon's employment terminates without cause or for good reason on or prior to June 1, 2012. Options for 75,000 USM Common Shares become exercisable on June 1, 2016 (subject to continued employment) and are not subject to accelerated vesting in the event Ms. Dillon's employment terminates without cause or for good reason. All of such options are exercisable until June 1, 2020. Ms. Dillon's letter agreement is further discussed below in Note 2 under Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

(k)
 
Represents the per-share exercise price of the options granted in column (j). Such exercise price is not less than the closing market price of the underlying security on the date of the grant.

73

(l)   Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. In the case of the restricted stock units, such value is reduced by the estimated value of the discounted cash flows of dividends that would normally be received with respect to such shares (because restricted stock units do not receive credit for dividends prior to vesting). In the case of any adjustment or amendment of the exercise or base price of options, stock appreciation rights ("SARs") or similar option-like instruments previously awarded to a named executive officer, whether through amendment, cancellation or replacement grants, or any other means ("repriced"), or other material modification of such awards, represents the incremental fair value, computed as of the repricing or modification date in accordance with FASB ASC 718, with respect to that repriced or modified award. No options, SARs or other similar awards were repriced or materially modified in the last fiscal year with respect to the identified executive officers.

Footnotes:

(1)
 
Represents amounts payable under the bonus guidelines and procedures. The bonus guidelines for the President and CEO of TDS, the President and CEO of U.S. Cellular and the President and CEO of TDS Telecom do not provide for a Threshold, Target or Maximum bonus based on specified performance measures. The above amounts for the other officers relate to the Company performance portion of the bonus with respect to 2010 performance that was paid in 2011. The Threshold amount is zero because there is no minimum level that is required for overall Company performance before a bonus can be earned. The Target amount represents the bonus for Company performance that would have been paid in 2011 if the target performance for the payment of a bonus was achieved for each performance measure in 2010 by U.S. Cellular and TDS Telecom. The Maximum amount represents the maximum bonus for Company performance that would have been paid in 2011 if each performance measure for U.S. Cellular and TDS in 2010 equaled or exceeded 200% of its target in 2010. The following shows the actual amount of non-equity incentive plan compensation in 2010 for Kenneth R. Meyers and Scott H. Williamson for reference for comparison to the Threshold, Target and Maximum above, representing 68.5% of the Target (before any discretionary adjustment).

 
 
Kenneth R. Meyers—$ 97,484
Scott H. Williamson—$ 64,139

(2)
 
Pursuant to the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, on the date specified, such executive officer was granted restricted stock units and options to purchase TDS Special Common Shares. The aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 of the stock awards is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (e) and the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 of the option awards is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (f). Dividends are not earned with respect to shares underlying restricted stock units until the award becomes vested and the shares are issued or on shares underlying options until such options are exercised and the shares are issued.

 
 
Pursuant to the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, executives who deferred all or a portion of their annual bonuses received phantom stock match units. The aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 of the phantom stock match units is reported in the Summary Compensation Table under "Stock Awards" in column (e).

(3)
 
Pursuant to the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, on the date specified, the U.S. Cellular Long-Term Incentive Compensation Committee granted to Mary N. Dillon restricted stock units and options to purchase USM Common Shares pursuant to a letter agreement dated May 3, 2010 between U.S. Cellular and Ms. Dillon. The aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 of the stock awards is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (e) and the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 of the option awards is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (f). U.S. Cellular does not currently pay dividends.

(4)
 
Includes the number of phantom stock units in TDS Special Common Shares awarded to such officer with respect to company match units related to deferred bonus compensation. The TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan provides the opportunity for the above officers (other than Ms. Dillon) to defer receipt of a portion of their bonuses and receive TDS matching stock units. The aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 of the matched stock units is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (e) under "Stock Awards" and the grant date fair value is reported in the above table. The above table does not include the amount of the dividends paid on deferred bonus. Such dividends are not preferential because they are not earned at a rate higher than dividends on TDS' common stock. See the "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" table below for bonus phantom stock and dividends credited to the named executive officers.

74

Information Regarding Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End

        The following table shows, as to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table, certain information regarding outstanding equity awards at year end.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 
   Option Awards   Stock Awards  
Name
(a) 		  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options: (#)
Exercisable
(b) 		  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options: (#)
Unexercisable
(c) 		  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d) 		  Option
Exercise
Price
(e) 		  Option
Expiration
Date
(f) 		  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
(g) 		  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
(h) 		  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested (#)
(i) 		  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(j) 		 

LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. (1)

                                                        
 

Options:

                                                        
   

2010 TDS.S Options (3)

           250,000         $ 26.66     5/25/20                          
   

2009 TDS.S Options (4)

     81,333     162,667         $ 26.95     5/20/19                          
   

2008 TDS.S Options (5)

     150,950     75,475         $ 35.35     5/21/18                          
   

2007 TDS.S Options (6)

     179,653               $ 59.45     7/2/17                          
   

2006 TDS.S Options (7)

     213,333               $ 49.80     12/13/16                          
   

2005 Tandem Options (8)

     111,045               $ 77.36     4/20/15                          
   

2004 Tandem Options (9)

     67,540               $ 66.00     5/8/14                          
   

2003 Tandem Options (10)

     65,567               $ 52.92     7/3/13                          
   

2002 Tandem Options (11)

     68,215               $ 60.20     8/19/12                          
   

2001 Tandem Options (12)

     29,429               $ 99.44     4/30/11                          
 

Stock Awards:

                                                        
   

2010 TDS.S RSUs (13)

                                   37,400   $ 1,178,848              
   

2009 TDS.S RSUs (14)

                                   41,141   $ 1,296,764              
   

TDS.S Bonus Match not vested: (19)

                                   1,079   $ 34,010              
                                                 
     

Total TDS.S

     625,269     488,142                       79,620   $ 2,509,622              
                                                 
     

Total Tandem

     341,796     —                       —   $ —              
                                                 

Kenneth R. Meyers (2)

                                                        
 

Options:

                                                        
   

2010 TDS.S Options (3)

           132,500         $ 26.66     5/25/20                          
   

2009 TDS.S Options (4)

     43,133     86,267         $ 26.95     5/20/19                          
   

2008 TDS.S Options (5)

     62,000     31,000         $ 35.35     5/21/18                          
   

2007 TDS.S Options (6)

     52,942               $ 59.45     7/2/17                          
   

2006 USM Options (15)

     22,819               $ 59.43     4/3/16                          
   

2005 USM Options (16)

     17,200               $ 45.63     3/31/15                          
   

2004 USM Options (17)

     8,807               $ 38.65     3/31/14                          
 

Stock Awards:

                                                        
   

2010 TDS.S RSUs (13)

                                   17,000   $ 535,840              
   

2009 TDS.S RSUs (14)

                                   17,622   $ 555,445              
   

TDS.S Bonus Match not vested (19)

                                   788   $ 24,838              
                                                 
     

Total TDS.S

     158,075     249,767                       35,410   $ 1,116,123              
                                                 
     

Total USM

     48,826     —                       —   $ —              
                                                 

                                                       

75

 
   Option Awards   Stock Awards  
Name
(a) 		  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options: (#)
Exercisable
(b) 		  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options: (#)
Unexercisable
(c) 		  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d) 		  Option
Exercise
Price
(e) 		  Option
Expiration
Date
(f) 		  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
(g) 		  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)
(h) 		  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested (#)
(i) 		  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
(j) 		 

Mary N. Dillon (2)

                                                        
 

Options:

                                                        
   

Initial CEO USM Options (with accelerated vesting) (18)

           75,000         $ 40.81     6/1/20                          
   

Initial CEO USM Options (without accelerated vesting) (18)

           75,000         $ 40.81     6/1/20                          
 

Stock Awards:

                                                        
   

Initial CEO USM RSUs (with accelerated vesting) (20)

                                   20,000   $ 998,800              
   

Initial CEO USM RSUs (without accelerated vesting) (20)

                                   25,000   $ 1,248,500              
                                                 
     

Total USM

     —     150,000                       45,000   $ 2,247,300              
                                                 

Scott H. Williamson (1)

                                                        
 

Options:

                                                        
   

2010 TDS.S Options (3)

           91,200         $ 26.66     5/25/20                          
   

2009 TDS.S Options (4)

     30,233     60,467         $ 26.95     5/20/19                          
   

2008 TDS.S Options (5)

     45,666     22,834         $ 35.35     5/21/18                          
   

2007 TDS.S Options (6)

     56,998               $ 59.45     7/2/17                          
   

2006 TDS.S Options (7)

     75,122               $ 38.00     6/19/16                          
   

2005 Tandem Options (8)

     24,493               $ 77.36     4/20/15                          
   

2001 Tandem Options (12)

     7,690               $ 99.44     4/30/11                          
 

Stock Awards:

                                                        
   

2010 TDS.S RSUs (13)

                                   11,700   $ 368,784              
   

2009 TDS.S RSUs (14)

                                   12,389   $ 390,501              
                                                 
     

Total TDS.S

     208,019     174,501                       24,089   $ 759,285              
                                                 
     

Total Tandem

     32,183     —                       —   $ —              
                                                 

David A. Wittwer (1)

                                                        
 

Options:

                                                        
   

2010 TDS.S Options (3)

           92,800         $ 26.66     5/25/20                          
   

2009 TDS.S Options (4)

     29,833     59,667         $ 26.95     5/20/19                          
   

2008 TDS.S Options (5)

     45,666     22,834         $ 35.35     5/21/18                          
   

2007 TDS.S Options (6)

     43,077               $ 59.45     7/2/17                          
   

2006 TDS.S Options (7)

     35,364               $ 38.00     6/19/16                          
   

2001 Tandem Options (12)

     1,441               $ 99.44     4/30/11                          
 

Stock Awards:

                                                        
   

2010 TDS.S RSUs (13)

                                   12,200   $ 384,544              
                                                 
     

Total TDS.S

     153,940     175,301                       12,200   $ 384,544              
                                                 
     

Total Tandem

     1,441     —                       —   $ —              
                                                 

Explanation of Columns:

(a)
Includes the persons identified in the Summary Compensation Table.

(b)
Includes, on an award-by-award basis, the number of securities underlying unexercised options, including awards that have been transferred other than for value, that are exercisable as of December 31, 2010. No awards have been transferred. TDS awards for 2006 and subsequent years represent awards with respect to TDS Special Common Shares. TDS awards prior to 2006 represent the number of tandem TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares subject to options. Awards to Ms. Dillon, and awards to Mr. Meyers relating to periods prior to 2007, represent awards with respect to USM Common Shares.

76

(c)
Includes, on an award-by-award basis, the number of securities underlying unexercised options, including awards that have been transferred other than for value, that are unexercisable as of December 31, 2010, if any. No awards have been transferred.

(d)
This column is not applicable because the identified officers do not have any options that are equity incentive plan awards, as defined by SEC rules.

(e)
Represents the exercise prices of the awards identified in columns (b) and (c).

(f)
Represents the expiration dates of the awards identified in columns (b) and (c).

(g)
Represents the total number of shares underlying stock awards that have not vested as of December 31, 2010.

(h)
Represents the market value of shares underlying stock awards that have not vested as of December 31, 2010, calculated using the closing price of TDS Special Common Shares of $31.52, on December 31, 2010, the last trading day of 2010. With respect to Ms. Dillon, the aggregate market value of shares underlying stock awards that have not vested as of December 31, 2010, was calculated using the closing price of USM Common Shares of $49.94 on December 31, 2010, the last trading day of 2010.

(i)
This column is not applicable because the identified officers do not have any stock awards that are equity incentive plan awards, as defined by SEC rules.

(j)
This column is not applicable because the identified officers do not have any stock awards that are equity incentive plan awards, as defined by SEC rules.

Footnotes:

        The following provides additional information with respect to outstanding equity awards at year end. Number references correspond to numbers in the above table. The following discloses the date that options were scheduled to become exercisable and that restricted stock units were scheduled to become vested.

(1)
With respect to such officer, information is presented as to the number of TDS shares underlying options or stock awards. Awards subsequent to 2005 represent awards with respect to TDS Special Common Shares. Award prior to 2006 represent the number of tandem TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares subject to options. The tandem awards provide that upon exercise, the holder will acquire an equal number of TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares. Dividends are not earned with respect to shares underlying restricted stock units until the award becomes vested and the shares are issued or on shares underlying options until such options are exercised and the shares are issued.

(2)
With respect to Mary N. Dillon, and with respect to Kenneth R. Meyers relating to periods prior to 2007, represents USM Common Shares underlying options or stock awards. With respect to Kenneth R. Meyers for 2007 and thereafter, represents TDS Special Common Shares underlying options or stock awards. U.S. Cellular does not currently pay any dividends.

(3)
Such 2010 TDS.S Options represent options to purchase TDS Special Common Shares, were granted on May 25, 2010, become exercisable with respect to one third of such options on each of May 25, 2011, May 25, 2012 and May 25, 2013, and are exercisable until May 25, 2020 at the exercise price of $26.66 per share.

(4)
Such 2009 TDS.S Options represent options to purchase TDS Special Common Shares, were granted on May 21, 2009, become exercisable with respect to one third of such options on each of May 21, 2010, May 21, 2011 and May 21, 2012, and are exercisable until May 20, 2019 at the exercise price of $26.95 per share.

(5)
Such 2008 TDS.S Options represent options to purchase TDS Special Common Shares, were granted on August 26, 2008, become exercisable with respect to one third of such options on each of August 26, 2009, August 26, 2010 and August 26, 2011, and are exercisable until May 21, 2018 at the exercise price of $35.35 per share.

(6)
Such 2007 TDS.S Options represent options to purchase TDS Special Common Shares, were granted on July 2, 2007, became exercisable on December 15, 2007 and are exercisable until July 2, 2017 at the exercise price of $59.45 per share.

(7)
With respect to LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., such 2006 TDS.S Options were granted on December 13, 2006, became exercisable on December 15, 2006 and are exercisable until December 13, 2016 at the exercise price of $49.80 per share. With respect to Scott H. Williamson and David A. Wittwer, such 2006 TDS.S Options represent options to purchase TDS Special Common Shares, were granted on June 19, 2006, became exercisable on December 15, 2006 and are exercisable until June 19, 2016 at the exercise price of $38.00 per share.

(8)
Such 2005 Tandem Options became exercisable on December 15, 2005 and are exercisable until April 20, 2015 at the exercise price of $77.36 per tandem option to purchase an equal number of TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares.

(9)
Such 2004 Tandem Options became exercisable on December 15, 2004 and are exercisable until May 8, 2014 at the exercise price of $66.00 per tandem option to purchase an equal number of TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares.

(10)
Such 2003 Tandem Options became exercisable on December 15, 2003 and are exercisable until July 3, 2013 at the exercise price of $52.92 per tandem option to purchase an equal number of TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares.

(11)
Such 2002 Tandem Options became exercisable on December 15, 2002 and are exercisable until August 19, 2012 at the exercise price of $60.20 per tandem option to purchase an equal number of TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common.

(12)
Such 2001 Tandem Options became exercisable on December 15, 2001 and are exercisable until April 30, 2011 at the exercise price of $99.44 per tandem option to purchase an equal number of TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares.

(13)
Such 2010 TDS.S Restricted Stock Units will become vested on December 15, 2012.

77

(14)
Such 2009 TDS.S Restricted Stock Units will become vested on December 15, 2011.

(15)
The 2006 USM Options granted to Mr. Meyers became exercisable in annual increments of 25% on April 3 of each year beginning in 2007 and ending in 2010, and are exercisable until April 3, 2016 at an exercise price of $59.43 per share.

(16)
The 2005 USM Options granted to Mr. Meyers became exercisable in annual increments of 25% on March 31 of each year beginning in 2006 and ending in 2009, and are exercisable until March 31, 2015 at an exercise price of $45.63 per share.

(17)
The 2004 USM Options granted to Mr. Meyers became exercisable in annual increments of 25% on March 31 of each year beginning in 2005 and ending in 2008, and are exercisable until March 31, 2014 at an exercise price of $38.65 per share.

(18)
The Initial CEO USM Options (with accelerated vesting, as discussed in Note 2 under the Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control below) become exercisable with respect to one-third of such options on each of June 1, 2011, June 1, 2012 and June 1, 2013, and are exercisable until June 1, 2020 at an exercise price of $40.81 per share. The Initial CEO USM Options (without accelerated vesting) become exercisable on June 1, 2016 and are exercisable until June 1, 2020 at an exercise price of $40.81 per share.

(19)
Represents phantom stock match units awarded to such officer with respect to deferred bonus compensation. See "Information Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" below. Represents the number of TDS Special Common Shares underlying stock awards. One-third of the phantom stock bonus match units become vested on each of the first three anniversaries of the last day of the year for which the applicable bonus is payable, provided that such officer is an employee of TDS or an affiliate on such date.

(20)
The Initial CEO USM RSUs (with accelerated vesting, as discussed in Note 2 under the Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control) become vested on June 1, 2013. The Initial CEO USM RSUs (without accelerated vesting) become vested on June 1, 2016.

78

Information Regarding Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2010

        The following table shows, as to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table, certain information regarding option exercises and stock vested in 2010.

Option Exercises And Stock Vested

 
   Option Awards   Stock Awards  
Name
(a) 		  Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
(b) 		  Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
(c) 		  Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
(d) 		  Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
(e) 		 

LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. (1)

                          
 

TDS/TDS.S Options Exercised (Exercise Date) (7):

     —     —              
 

TDS.S Stock Awards Vested:

                          
   

2008 TDS.S Restricted Stock Units (3)

                 32,735   $ 1,012,494  
   

TDS.S Bonus Match Units (4) (5)

                 1,016   $ 32,024  
                   
     

Total TDS.S

     —   $ —     33,751   $ 1,044,518  
                   

Kenneth R. Meyers (1)(2)

                          
 

TDS.S Options Exercised (Exercise Date) (6)(7):

     —     —              
 

TDS.S Stock Awards Vested

                          
   

2008 TDS.S Restricted Stock Units (3)

                 13,448   $ 415,947  
   

TDS.S Bonus Match Units (4)(5)

                 727   $ 22,915  
 

USM Options Exercised (Exercise Date) (6)(7):

     —     —              
                   
     

Total TDS.S

     —   $ —     14,175   $ 438,862  
                   
     

Total USM

     —   $ —     —   $ —  
                   

Mary N. Dillon (2)

                          
 

USM Options Exercised (Exercise Date) (7):

     —     —              
 

USM Stock Awards Vested:

                 —     —  
                   
     

Total USM

     —   $ —     —   $ —  
                   

Scott H. Williamson (1)

                          
 

TDS/TDS.S Options Exercised (Exercise Date) (7):

     —     —              
 

TDS.S Stock Awards Vested:

                          
   

2008 TDS.S Restricted Stock Units (3)

                 9,904   $ 306,331  
                   
     

Total TDS.S

     —   $ —     9,904   $ 306,331  
                   

David A. Wittwer (1)

                          
 

TDS/TDS.S Options Exercised (Exercise Date) (7):

     —     —              
 

TDS.S Stock Awards Vested:

                          
   

2008 TDS.S Restricted Stock Units (3)

                 9,120   $ 282,082  
                   
     

Total TDS.S

     —   $ —     9,120   $ 282,082  
                   

Explanation of Columns:

(a)
Includes the persons identified in the Summary Compensation Table.

(b)
Represents the number of securities for which options were exercised.

(c)
Represents the aggregate dollar value realized upon exercise of options, based on the difference between the market price of the underlying securities at exercise and the exercise or base price of the options.

(d)
Represents the number of shares of stock that have vested. This includes restricted stock units and bonus plan company-match phantom stock units that became vested in 2010.

(e)
Represents the aggregate dollar value realized upon vesting of stock, calculated by multiplying the number of shares of stock or units by the market value of the underlying shares on the vesting date.

Footnotes:

(1)
Except with respect to Kenneth R. Meyers to the extent indicated, information is presented as to the number of TDS shares underlying options or stock awards. Except for TDS awards granted prior to 2006, which represent tandem TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares subject to options, the TDS awards represent awards with respect to TDS Special Common Shares. The tandem awards provide that upon exercise, the holder will acquire an equal number of TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares.

79

(2)
With respect to Mary N. Dillon, and with respect to Kenneth R. Meyers to the extent indicated, represents USM Common Shares underlying options or stock awards.

(3)
On December 15, 2010, the 2008 TDS.S restricted stock units vested and were issued in TDS Special Common Shares. The amounts in column (e) relating to such shares represent the market values of these shares on such date, using the closing price of $30.93 on December 15, 2010.

(4)
Pursuant to the TDS 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the bonus plan company-match phantom stock units vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the last day of the year for which the applicable bonus is payable, provided that such employee is an employee of TDS or an affiliate on such date. The stock price used to calculate the value realized on vesting for TDS shares was the closing price of TDS Special Common Shares of $31.52 on December 31, 2010, the last trading day of 2010. See "Information Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" below.

(5)
Pursuant to SEC rules, column (h) of the Summary Compensation Table does not include any dividends (or dividend equivalents) on deferred bonus denominated in phantom TDS stock because such dividends are not preferential under SEC rules, because they are not earned at a rate higher than dividends on TDS' common stock. U.S. Cellular does not currently pay dividends.

(6)
Kenneth R. Meyers received options, restricted stock units and bonus match units in USM Common Shares prior to 2007 when he was employed by U.S. Cellular and received such awards in TDS Special Common Shares in 2007 and later years after he became employed by TDS.

(7)
See the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table above for a description of the options that continued to be held by the named executive officers at December 31, 2010.

        From time to time, TDS authorizes its executive officers to enter into plans under Section 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These plans may include specific instructions for the broker to exercise stock options and/or sell stock on behalf of the executive based on a pre-determined schedule or formula. The purpose of such plans is to enable executive officers to recognize the value of their compensation and sell their holdings of TDS common stock during periods in which the officer would otherwise be unable to buy or sell such stock because important information about TDS has not been publicly released.

80

Information Regarding Pension Benefits

        TDS and U.S. Cellular executive officers are covered by the Tax-Deferred Savings Plan (a tax-qualified "defined contribution" plan), the Pension Plan (a tax-qualified "defined contribution" plan) and the SERP (a non-qualified "defined contribution" supplemental plan), as discussed above. The company contributions for each of the named executive officers under these plans is disclosed in column (i), "All Other Compensation," of the Summary Compensation Table. TDS and U.S. Cellular do not have any "defined benefit" pension plans (including supplemental plans). The named executive officers only participate in tax-qualified defined contribution plans and a non-qualified defined contribution plan. Accordingly, the Pension Benefits table required to be provided by SEC rules is not applicable.

Information Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

        The following table shows, as to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table, certain information regarding nonqualified deferred compensation.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Name
(a) 		  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(b) 		  Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(c) 		  Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)
(d) 		  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
(e) 		  Aggregate
Balance at Last
FYE
($)
(f) 		 

LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.

                                

SERP (1)

                                
 

Company contribution

         $ 5,872                    
 

Interest up to AFR

               $ 21,493              
 

Interest above AFR

               $ 5,724              
                               
 

Total Interest

               $ 27,217              
 

Balance at year end

                           $ 461,233  

Bonus Deferral and Company Match (3):

                                
 

Deferral of 2009 Bonus paid in 2010—4,309 TDS.S Shares

   $ 123,750                          
 

Company Match for 2009 Bonus paid in 2010 of 1,077 TDS.S Shares

         $ 30,931                    
 

Dividends on Deferred Bonus and Company Match:

                                
   

454 TDS.S Shares

               $ 14,310              
   

155 TDS Shares

               $ 5,665              
 

Changes in Value in 2010

               $ 85,937              

Accumulated Balance at Year End:

                                
 

34,369 TDS.S Shares (including 1,079 unvested shares)

                           $ 1,083,311  
 

12,787 TDS Shares (all vested)

                           $ 467,365  
                               

Total Value of Accumulated Balance

                           $ 1,550,676  
                       

Aggregate Totals (5)

   $ 123,750   $ 36,803   $ 133,129   $ —   $ 2,011,909  
                       

81

Name
(a) 		  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(b) 		  Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(c) 		  Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)
(d) 		  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
(e) 		  Aggregate
Balance at Last
FYE
($)
(f) 		 

Kenneth R. Meyers

                                

SERP (1)

                                
 

Company contribution

         $ 37,504                    
 

Interest up to AFR

               $ 21,125              
 

Interest above AFR

               $ 5,626              
                               
 

Total Interest

               $ 26,751              
 

Balance at year end

                           $ 485,069  

Salary Deferral (2)

                                
 

TDS

                                
   

Salary deferral

   $ 56,868                          
   

Interest up to AFR

               $ 9,283              
   

Interest above AFR

               $ 1,645              
                               
   

Total Interest

               $ 10,928              
   

Balance at year end

                           $ 237,483  
 

U.S. Cellular (for periods prior to 2007)

                                
   

Interest up to AFR

               $ 2,166              
   

Interest above AFR

               $ 285              
                               
   

Total Interest

               $ 2,451              
   

Balance at year end

                           $ 47,726  

Bonus Deferral and Company Match (3):

                                
 

TDS.S Shares:

                                
 

Deferral of 2009 Bonus paid in 2010—2,910 TDS.S Shares

   $ 83,575                          
 

Company Match for 2009 Bonus paid in 2010 of 727 TDS.S Shares

         $ 20,879                    
 

Dividends on Deferred Bonus and Company Match of 136 TDS.S Shares

               $ 4,287              
 

Changes in Value in 2010

               $ 20,006              

Accumulated Balance at Year End:

                                
 

11,191 TDS.S Shares (including 788 unvested shares)

                           $ 352,740  
 

USM Shares:

                                
 

Changes in Value in 2010

               $ (1,273 )            
 

Distribution in 2010—1,226 USM Common Shares (4)

                     $ (50,722 )      
 

Accumulated Balance at Year End—0 USM Shares (all distributed)

                           $ —  
                       

Aggregate Totals (5)

   $ 140,443   $ 58,383   $ 63,150   $ (50,722 ) $ 1,123,018  
                       

82

Name
(a) 		  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(b) 		  Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
(c) 		  Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)
(d) 		  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
(e) 		  Aggregate
Balance at Last
FYE
($)
(f) 		 

Mary N. Dillon

                                

Salary Deferral (2)

                                
 

Salary deferral

   $ 97,596                          
 

Interest up to AFR

               $ 921              
 

Interest above AFR

               $ 284              
                               
 

Total Interest

               $ 1,205              
 

Balance at year end

                           $ 98,801  
                       

Aggregate Totals (5)

   $ 97,596   $ —   $ 1,205   $ —   $ 98,801  
                       

Scott H. Williamson

                                

SERP (1)

                                
 

Company contribution

         $ 24,709                    
 

Interest up to AFR

               $ 20,198              
 

Interest above AFR

               $ 5,379              
                               
 

Total Interest

               $ 25,577              
 

Balance at year end

                           $ 452,643  
                       

Aggregate Totals (5)

   $ —   $ 24,709   $ 25,577   $ —   $ 452,643  
                       

David A. Wittwer

                                

SERP (1)

                                
 

Company contribution

         $ 12,000                    
 

Interest up to AFR

               $ 6,596              
 

Interest above AFR

               $ 1,757              
                               
 

Total Interest

               $ 8,353              
 

Balance at year end

                           $ 151,759  

Salary Deferred in prior years (2)

                                
 

Interest up to AFR

               $ 62,558              
 

Interest above AFR

               $ 10,094              
                               
 

Total Interest

               $ 72,652              
 

Balance at year end

                           $ 1,379,310  
                       

Aggregate Totals (5)

   $ —   $ 12,000   $ 81,005   $ —   $ 1,531,069  
                       

Explanation of Columns:

(a)
Includes the persons identified in the Summary Compensation Table.

(b)
Represents the dollar amount of executive contributions during the last fiscal year. With respect to any deferred salary, includes the actual dollar amount deferred. The entire amount of the salary earned in 2010 is included in column (c) of the Summary Compensation Table, whether or not deferred. Only Mary N. Dillon and Kenneth R. Meyers deferred a portion of their salary in 2010. The deferred salary account is paid at the time and in the form provided in the applicable plan or agreement, which permits certain distribution elections by the officer.

With respect to deferred bonus, includes the actual dollar amount of bonus deferred, which amount is also included in the Summary Compensation Table. The entire amount of the bonus is included in the Summary Compensation Table, whether or not deferred. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. and Kenneth R. Meyers each deferred a portion of their 2009 bonus paid in 2010. The named executive officers employed by TDS receive a distribution of the deferred compensation account at the earlier of the date elected by the officer and the officer's separation from service (or, with respect to amounts subject to section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the seventh calendar month following the calendar month of the officer's separation from service). The named executive officers employed by U.S. Cellular receive a distribution of the deferred compensation account at the date elected by the officer (either the officer's separation from service, subject to any six-month delay required by section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, or a date specified by the officer).

(c)
Represents the dollar amount of aggregate contributions by TDS or U.S. Cellular during the last fiscal year. With respect to the SERP, represents the actual dollar amount contributed with respect to 2010 for the officer. This is the same as the amount reported in column (i) of the Summary Compensation Table. With respect to the company match, the amount in 2010 represents the value of the shares underlying the phantom stock units awarded to such officer. This is the same as the amount included in column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table.

83

(d)
Includes the dollar amount of aggregate interest or other earnings accrued during the last fiscal year. With respect to the SERP, represents the actual dollar amount earned in 2010 by the officer, of which any amount that is deemed to be above-market or preferential earnings as defined by SEC rules is included in column (h) of the Summary Compensation Table. With respect to any deferred salary, includes the amount of interest credited to the deferred account for 2010, of which any amount that is deemed to be above-market or preferential earnings as defined by SEC rules is included in column (h) of the Summary Compensation Table. The amount up to the AFR (as previously defined) is not deemed to be above-market or preferential. The amount above the AFR is deemed to be above-market or preferential and, therefore, is included in the Summary Compensation Table. With respect to dividends on the bonus deferral and company match, represents the dollar value of the phantom stock units credited to the account of the identified officer as dividends, based on the closing price of the underlying shares on December 31, 2010, the last trading day of the year.

Also includes the changes in value of the bonus deferral units and company match units in 2010. This amount is not included in the Summary Compensation Table.

(e)
Represents the aggregate dollar amount of any withdrawals by or distributions to the executive during the last fiscal year. Any such amounts represent withdrawals or distributions of company and/or employee contributions and/or earnings and are not included in 2010 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table.

(f)
Represents the dollar value of the balance of the executive's account as of the end of the last fiscal year. With respect to the SERP, represents the actual dollar amount in the executive's account as of December 31, 2010. With respect to any deferred salary, represents the actual dollar amount in the executive's account as of December 31, 2010. With respect to bonus deferral and company match, represents the dollar value of the number of phantom stock units held in the executive's account as of December 31, 2010 based on the closing price of the underlying shares on December 31, 2010, the last trading day of the year. The stock price used for TDS shares was the closing price of TDS Common Shares of $36.55 and TDS Special Common Shares of $31.52, on December 31, 2010. The stock price used for U.S. Cellular shares was the closing price of USM Common Shares of $49.94 on December 31, 2010. Column (f) includes amounts reported as 2010 compensation in the Summary Compensation Table, as indicated in notes to columns (b) through (d).

Footnotes:

(1)
Each of the identified officers participates in the SERP, except that Ms. Dillon did not begin to participate until 2011. This plan provides supplemental benefits to the TDS Pension Plan to offset the reduction of benefits caused by the limitation on annual employee compensation which can be considered for tax qualified pension plans under the Internal Revenue Code. The SERP is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan and is intended to be unfunded. Such officers are credited with earnings on their balances in this nonqualified defined contribution plan. Under the SERP, the deferred balance is credited with an assumed rate of earnings on all amounts other than the contributions for the current year equal to the yield on ten year BBB rated industrial bonds for the last trading date of the prior year as quoted by Standard & Poor's. The interest rate for 2010 was set as of the last trading date of 2009 at 6.36% per annum, based on the yield on ten year BBB rated industrial bonds at such time. Such rate exceeded 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, with compounding (as prescribed under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code) ("AFR"), of 5.02% at such time. Accordingly, pursuant to SEC rules, column (h) of the Summary Compensation Table for 2010 includes the portion of such interest that exceeded the AFR at the time the interest rate was set.

See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" for information relating to vesting and distribution of amounts under the SERP.

(2)
Represents deferred salary accounts pursuant to deferred salary compensation agreements with Ms. Dillon, Mr. Meyers and Mr. Wittwer. The other officers have not deferred any of their salaries. All of the annual salary is reported in column (c) of the Summary Compensation Table, whether or not deferred. Pursuant to the agreements, the deferred salary accounts are credited with interest compounded monthly, computed at a rate equal to one-twelfth of the sum of the average thirty-year Treasury Bond rate for salary deferred as an employee of TDS, or the twenty-year Treasury Bond rate for salary deferred as an employee of U.S. Cellular, plus 1.25 percentage points, until the deferred compensation amount is paid to such person. As required by SEC rules, column (h) of the Summary Compensation Table includes the portion of such interest that exceeded interest calculated using the AFR at the time each monthly interest rate is set.

(3)
The amounts in column (b) represent deferrals of annual bonus. All of the annual bonus earned is reported in the Summary Compensation Table, whether or not deferred. The amounts in column (c) represent the value of company match units awarded to such officer. One-third of the phantom stock bonus match units vest with respect to a particular year's deferred bonus on each of the first three anniversaries of the last day of the year for which the applicable bonus is payable, provided that the officer is an employee of TDS or U.S. Cellular or an affiliate on such date. If the officer continues as an employee during the entire vesting period, he or she will receive a total bonus match equal to the sum of (i) 25% of amounts deferred up to 50% of such year's bonus and (ii) 33% (331/3% in the case of an officer employed by U.S. Cellular) of amounts deferred that exceed 50% of such year's bonus. The vesting of unvested phantom stock match units may accelerate under certain circumstances and the effects of such acceleration are disclosed in the "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" table below. The aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 of the matched stock units is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (e) under "Stock Awards."

A TDS officer will receive in shares an amount equal to his or her vested deferred compensation account balance at the earlier of the date elected by the officer and the officer's separation from service (or, with respect to amounts subject to

84

(4)
Represents a distribution of Mr. Meyer's entire USM Common Share account balance on May 15, 2010, all of which relates to 2007. The distribution represented 1,226 gross USM Common Shares, having a value of $50,722. The distribution represents shares underlying phantom stock units relating to deferred bonus and the company match reported in prior years in the Summary Compensation Table under Bonus and Stock Awards, respectively. After deduction of shares for taxes, Mr. Meyers received a net of 882 USM Common Shares, plus cash for a fractional share.

(5)
Information relating to deferred compensation amounts included in the above Summary Compensation Table for 2010 is discussed in the above notes. As required by SEC rules, the following is a summary of the amount of the total deferred compensation balances reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table in years prior to 2010, beginning with deferred compensation in 2006, which is the first year in which deferred compensation was reported pursuant to the above table. The below amounts do not include previously reported deferred compensation that has been distributed.

 
   LeRoy T.
Carlson, Jr. 		  Kenneth R.
Meyers 		  Mary N.
Dillon 		  Scott H.
Williamson 		  David A.
Wittwer 		 

SERP Company Contribution

   $ 82,083   $ 107,189   $ —   $ 76,354   $ 11,311  

Salary Deferral

     —     158,617     —     —     —  

Excess Interest

     11,319     12,163     —     10,511     12,929  

Bonus Deferral

     470,750     240,690     —     —     —  

Company Match

     120,188     60,173     —     —     —  
                       
 

Total

   $ 684,340   $ 578,832   $ —   $ 86,865   $ 24,240  
                       

85

Potential Payments Upon Termination Or Change-In-Control

        This section discusses, with respect to the executives identified in the Summary Compensation Table, each contract, agreement, plan or arrangement, whether written or unwritten, that provides for payments to such executive at, following, or in connection with any termination, including resignation, severance, retirement or constructive termination, or a change in control of TDS or a change in the executive officer's responsibilities.

        TDS does not have any plans or policies that provide for severance or other compensation or benefits to the named executive officers upon termination or a Change in Control other than the acceleration of vesting of option and stock awards upon certain events as discussed herein and other than certain agreements described in the footnotes to the Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control. However, TDS may enter into agreements or arrangements with officers that provide for severance or other compensation or benefits under circumstances that are negotiated with an officer in connection with the employment or termination of employment of such officer, as discussed below.

        The acceleration of vesting of awards is considered to be appropriate under certain qualified termination events or a Change in Control, but TDS does not consider it appropriate to generally provide for other significant severance or similar benefits in such events or to permit the acceleration of vesting of awards as a general rule for non-qualified termination events. TDS considers the fact that, unlike many companies that may be widely held, TDS is controlled by the TDS Voting Trust. As a result, TDS does not follow the practices of certain other companies that may provide for substantial benefits upon a termination or a Change in Control as a standard practice. Instead, potential payments upon termination or a Change in Control are designed primarily so that employees are neither harmed nor given a windfall in such circumstances. The acceleration of awards under certain circumstances is intended to motivate executive officers to act in the best long-term interests of TDS.

        With respect to agreements with specific officers, TDS may enter into arrangements that provide for severance or other compensation or benefits under circumstances that are negotiated with such officer in connection with employment or termination of employment. Any such agreement or arrangement is based on the facts and circumstances at the time relating to that particular employment relationship. TDS has entered into certain agreements with the named executive officers as described in the footnotes to the Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.

        The foregoing limited and customized approach to termination payments is consistent with TDS' overall compensation objectives, as discussed herein. These objectives assume that officers will be compensated primarily based on performance during their continued employment with TDS and are designed to motivate executive officers to act in the best long-term interest of TDS, recognizing that TDS is a controlled company. As a result, these objectives do not contemplate providing significant benefits upon or providing significant incentives with respect to qualified termination events or a Change in Control or providing any benefits upon non-qualified termination events. Accordingly, the limited amounts of termination and Change in Control payments provided as discussed herein are taken into account with all other facts and circumstances, but otherwise do not significantly affect decisions relating to other elements of compensation, which are provided consistent with the foregoing compensation objectives assuming continued employment until normal retirement.

Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

        The following table summarizes the estimated payments to be made under each contract, agreement, plan or arrangement which provides for payments to a named executive officer at, following, or in connection with any termination of employment including by resignation, retirement, disability or a constructive termination of a named executive officer, or a Change in Control or a change in the named executive officer's responsibilities. However, in accordance with SEC regulations, the following does not report any amount to be provided to a named executive officer under any arrangement that does not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our executive officers and which is available generally to all employees. Also, the following table does not repeat information disclosed above under the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table or the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

86


table, except to the extent that the amount payable to the named executive officer would be enhanced or accelerated by the termination event.

        The following table provides quantitative disclosure, assuming that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2010 and, if applicable, that the price per share of the registrant's securities is the closing market price as of December 31, 2010, the last trading day in 2010. Because all of the options granted prior to 2008 are exercisable as of December 31, 2010, no additional amounts would become payable with respect to options granted prior to 2008 upon any termination or Change in Control. However, additional payments may become due as a result of the acceleration of the vesting of restricted stock units and/or bonus match units, or options granted during 2008, 2009 or 2010, upon the following triggering events: (i) a qualified disability (for restricted stock units and bonus match awards but not options), (ii) death (for restricted stock units and bonus match awards but not options), (iii) a Change in Control (as defined above); (iv) a qualified retirement (for restricted stock units and options granted by either TDS or U.S. Cellular and bonus match awards granted by U.S. Cellular but not bonus match awards granted by TDS) and (v) a termination without cause or for good reason (for certain restricted stock units and options granted by U.S. Cellular to Mary N. Dillon, provided that such termination occurs on or before June 1, 2012) (collectively, "Triggering Events"). No such additional payments would be made in the event of any other termination of employment or service. In addition, the below table identifies other payments that have been, will be or could be made pursuant to agreements, if any, to the extent discussed in the footnotes to the below table. In particular, see footnote (2) to the below table relating to Mary N. Dillon.

87

Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Name
(a) 		  Early Vesting
of Options
($)
(b) 		  Early
Vesting
of Restricted
Stock Units
($)
(c) 		  Early Vesting
of Bonus Stock
Match Units
($)
(d) 		  Other
($)
(e) 		  Total
($)
(f) 		 

LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.

                                

Options (exercise price):

                                
 

2010 Options for 250,000 TDS.S Shares ($26.66) (1)

   $ 1,215,000                     $ 1,215,000  
 

2009 Options for 162,667 TDS.S Shares ($26.95) (1)

   $ 743,388                     $ 743,388  
 

2008 Options for 75,475 TDS.S Shares ($35.35) (1)

   $ —                     $ —  

Restricted Stock Units:

                                
 

2010 Award of 37,400 TDS.S Shares

         $ 1,178,848               $ 1,178,848  
 

2009 Award of 41,141 TDS.S Shares

         $ 1,296,764               $ 1,296,764  

Bonus Stock Match Units for unvested shares as of December 31, 2010:

                                
 

1,079 TDS.S Shares

               $ 34,010         $ 34,010  
                       

Aggregate Totals

   $ 1,958,388   $ 2,475,612   $ 34,010     —   $ 4,468,010  
                       

Kenneth R. Meyers

                                

Options (exercise price):

                                
 

2010 Options for 132,500 TDS.S Shares ($26.66) (1)

   $ 643,950                     $ 643,950  
 

2009 Options for 86,267 TDS.S Shares ($26.95) (1)

   $ 394,240                     $ 394,240  
 

2008 Options for 31,000 TDS.S Shares ($35.35)(1)

   $ —                     $ —  

Restricted Stock Units:

                                
 

2010 Award of 17,000 TDS.S Shares

         $ 535,840               $ 535,840  
 

2009 Award of 17,622 TDS.S Shares

         $ 555,445               $ 555,445  

Bonus Stock Match Units for unvested shares as of December 31, 2010:

                                
 

788 TDS.S Shares

               $ 24,838         $ 24,838  
                       

Aggregate Totals

   $ 1,038,190   $ 1,091,285   $ 24,838     —   $ 2,154,313  
                       

Mary N. Dillon (2)

                                

One Year of Current Salary

                     $ 725,000   $ 725,000  

Awards with Accelerated Vesting upon Termination without Cause or for Good Reason (exercise price):

                                
 

Initial CEO USM Options for 75,000 USM Shares ($40.81)

   $ 684,750                     $ 684,750  
 

Initial CEO USM RSUs (20,000 USM Shares)

         $ 998,800               $ 998,800  
                       

Subtotal of amounts that may be paid upon termination without Cause or for Good Reason (2)

   $ 684,750   $ 998,800   $ —   $ 725,000   $ 2,408,550  

Awards Without Accelerated Vesting upon Termination without Cause or for Good Reason:

                                
 

Initial CEO USM Options for 75,000 USM Shares ($40.81)

   $ 684,750                     $ 684,750  
 

Initial CEO USM RSUs (25,000 USM Shares)

         $ 1,248,500               $ 1,248,500  
                       

Aggregate Totals

   $ 1,369,500   $ 2,247,300   $ —   $ 725,000   $ 4,341,800  
                       

88

Name
(a) 		  Early Vesting
of Options
($)
(b) 		  Early
Vesting
of Restricted
Stock Units
($)
(c) 		  Early Vesting
of Bonus Stock
Match Units
($)
(d) 		  Other
($)
(e) 		  Total
($)
(f) 		 

Scott H. Williamson

                                

Options (exercise price):

                                
 

2010 Options for 91,200 TDS.S Shares ($26.66) (1)

   $ 443,232                     $ 443,232  
 

2009 Options for 60,467 TDS.S Shares ($26.95) (1)

   $ 276,334                     $ 276,334  
 

2008 Options for 22,834 TDS.S Shares ($35.35) (1)

   $ —                     $ —  

Restricted Stock Units:

                                
 

2010 Award of 11,700 TDS.S Shares

         $ 368,784               $ 368,784  
 

2009 Award of 12,389 TDS.S Shares

         $ 390,501               $ 390,501  
                       

Aggregate Totals

   $ 719,566   $ 759,285     —     —   $ 1,478,851  
                       

David A. Wittwer

                                

Options (exercise price):

                                
 

2010 Options for 92,800 TDS.S Shares ($26.66) (1)

   $ 451,008                     $ 451,008  
 

2009 Options for 59,667 TDS.S Shares ($26.95) (1)

   $ 272,678                     $ 272,678  
 

2008 Options for 22,834 TDS.S Shares ($35.35) (1)

   $ —                     $ —  

Restricted Stock Units:

                                
 

2010 Award of 12,200 TDS.S Shares

         $ 384,544               $ 384,544  
                       

Aggregate Totals

   $ 723,686   $ 384,544     —     —   $ 1,108,230  
                       

Explanation of Columns:

(a)
Includes the persons identified in the Summary Compensation Table.

(b)
Represents the maximum potential value of accelerated options assuming that a Triggering Event took place on December 31, 2010 and that the price per share of the registrant's securities is the closing market price as of December 31, 2010, the last trading day in 2010. The stock price used for TDS Special Common Shares was the closing price of TDS Special Common Shares of $31.52 on December 31, 2010. The stock price used for U.S. Cellular shares was the closing price of USM Common Shares of $49.94 on December 31, 2010.

(c)
Represents the maximum potential value of accelerated restricted stock units assuming that a Triggering Event took place on December 31, 2010 and that the price per share of the registrant's securities is the closing market price as of December 31, 2010, the last trading day in 2010. The stock price used for TDS Special Common Shares was the closing price of TDS Special Common Shares of $31.52 on December 31, 2010. The stock price used for U.S. Cellular shares was the closing price of USM Common Shares of $49.94 on December 31, 2010.

(d)
Represents the maximum potential value of accelerated bonus match units assuming that a Triggering Event took place on December 31, 2010 and that the price per share of the registrant's securities is the closing market price as of December 31, 2010, the last trading day in 2010. The stock price used for TDS Special Common Shares was the closing price of TDS Special Common Shares of $31.52 on December 31, 2010. The stock price used for U.S. Cellular shares was the closing price of USM Common Shares of $49.94 on December 31, 2010.

(e)
Except as disclosed for Mary N. Dillon, there were no other potential payments upon a termination or change in control as of December 31, 2010.

(f)
Represents the total of columns (b) through (e).

Although TDS has attempted to make a reasonable estimate (or a reasonable estimated range of amounts) applicable to the payment or benefit based on the disclosed material assumptions, the calculation of the foregoing represents forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be significantly different from the amounts expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include those set forth under "Risk Factors" in TDS' Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

TDS has no current obligations to pay any perquisites or other personal benefits to any of the named executive officers upon termination or change in control.

No information is provided with respect to contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements to the extent they do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of executive officers of the registrant and that are available generally to all employees.

Footnotes:

(1)
Represents the potential acceleration of unvested options. TDS options otherwise become exercisable with respect to one-third of the number of shares subject to the option on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. No dollar amount is reflected in the table with respect to the 2008 TDS options because the exercise price of $35.35 per share exceeded the closing price of the TDS.S shares of $31.52 per share on December 31, 2010, the last trading day of the year.

89

(2)
A letter agreement dated May 3, 2010 between U.S. Cellular and Mary N. Dillon related to her employment with U.S. Cellular effective June 1, 2010 provides for the following: (i) a base salary of $725,000 per year through December 31, 2010, with a performance review following year-end 2010; (ii) a one-time payment of $450,000 on the three month anniversary of Ms. Dillon's date of employment; (iii) a one-time payment of $250,000 on the fifteenth month anniversary of her date of employment; (iv) a 2010 bonus of at least $580,000; (v) starting in 2011, Ms. Dillon's target bonus opportunity will be 80% of her base salary for the year; (vi) a grant of 75,000 U.S. Cellular stock options on her first day of employment at a strike price equal to the closing price of U.S. Cellular's stock on that date, to vest in 3 equal annual installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of the grant; (vii) a grant of 20,000 U.S. Cellular restricted stock units on her first day of employment, to cliff vest on the third anniversary of the date of the grant; (viii) in the event that Ms. Dillon terminates without Cause or for Good Reason (as defined in the letter agreement) within two years of her starting date, she will fully vest in the foregoing stock option and restricted stock unit awards, and will have one year from the date of such a termination to exercise the options; (ix) in the event that Ms. Dillon terminates without Cause or for Good Reason within two years of her starting date, subject to Ms. Dillon's execution of a release of all claims against U.S. Cellular and TDS, she will receive an amount equal to one year of her then current salary (which was $725,000 as of December 31, 2010); (x) a grant of an additional 75,000 U.S. Cellular stock options on her first day of employment at a strike price equal to the closing price of U.S. Cellular's stock on that date, which will cliff vest on the sixth anniversary of the date of the grant; (xi) a grant of an additional 25,000 U.S. Cellular restricted stock units on her first day of employment, which will cliff vest on the sixth anniversary of the date of the grant; (xii) starting in 2011, annual grants of U.S. Cellular stock options and restricted stock units; (xiii) the total combined value of her stock option award and restricted stock unit award in each of 2011 and 2012 will be no less than $1,800,000; and (xiv) a seat on the U.S. Cellular Board. Reference is made to U.S. Cellular's Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010 for further information.

As a result of the foregoing severance payment and accelerated vesting provisions, with respect to Ms. Dillon, the above table shows a subtotal of the one year of salary that would be paid and the awards that would be accelerated if Ms. Dillon had terminated without Cause or for Good Reason as of December 31, 2010.

90

Compensation of Directors

        The following table shows, as to directors who are not executive officers of TDS, certain information regarding director compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.


Director Compensation

Name
(a) 		  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
(b) 		  Stock
Awards
($)
(c) 		  Option
Awards
($)
(d) 		  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
(e) 		  Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(f) 		  All Other
Compensation
($)
(g) 		  Total
($)
(h) 		 

Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. 

   $ 69,000   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 124,124  

Prudence E. Carlson

   $ 69,000   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 124,124  

Walter C.D. Carlson

   $ 127,500   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 182,624  

Clarence A. Davis

   $ 78,000   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 133,124  

Donald C. Nebergall

   $ 94,000   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 149,124  

George W. Off

   $ 126,000   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 181,124  

Christopher D. O'Leary

   $ 84,750   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 139,874  

Mitchell H. Saranow

   $ 106,000   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 161,124  

Gary L. Sugarman

   $ 77,750   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 132,874  

Herbert S. Wander

   $ 120,250   $ 55,000     —     —     —   $ 124   $ 175,374  

Explanation of Columns:

(a)
Includes each director unless such director is an executive officer whose compensation, including any compensation for service as a director, is fully reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. Accordingly, this includes only non-employee directors. Directors who are employees of TDS or its subsidiaries are identified in the Summary Compensation Table. Such directors do not receive director fees or compensation except for director life insurance, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table.

(b)
Includes the aggregate dollar amount of all fees earned or paid in cash for services as a director during 2010, including annual retainer fees, committee and/or chairmanship fees, and meeting fees.

(c)
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Pursuant to the terms of the Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended, represents the 2010 annual stock award of $55,000 (including cash in lieu of fractional shares). Based on the closing price of the TDS Special Common Shares on February 26, 2010, the last trading day in February 2010, of $28.39, 1,937 shares were issued. The following table discloses certain additional information with respect to stock awards to non-employee directors.

91

Name   Aggregate Number of
awards of TDS Special
Common Shares
outstanding at
December 31, 2010 		  Aggregate Number of
TDS Special Common
Shares underlying
Stock Awards Granted
in 2010 		  Aggregate Grant Date
Fair Value of Stock
Awards in 2010 		 

Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. 

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  

Prudence E. Carlson

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  

Walter C.D. Carlson

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  

Clarence A. Davis

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  

Donald C. Nebergall

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  

George W. Off

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  

Christopher D. O'Leary

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  

Mitchell H. Saranow

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  

Gary L. Sugarman

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  

Herbert S. Wander

     —     1,937   $ 55,000  
(d)
This column is not applicable because non-employee directors do not receive options.

(e)
This column is not applicable because non-employee directors do not participate in any non-equity incentive plans, as defined by SEC rules.

(f)
This column is not applicable because non-employee directors do not participate in any pension plans or receive any earnings on deferred compensation.

(g)
Represents the dollar value of insurance premiums paid by, or on behalf of, TDS during the fiscal year with respect to life insurance for the benefit of such director, which is the only category of other compensation.

(h)
Represents the sum of all amounts reported in columns (b) through (g).

Narrative Disclosure to Director Compensation Table

        The following provides additional information with respect to director compensation. All director compensation is approved by the full board of directors.

        The board of directors has approved a Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended (the "Directors Plan"), which was approved by TDS shareholders at the 2009 Annual Meeting. The following describes the approved plan.

        Non-employee directors will receive an annual director's retainer fee of $55,000 paid in cash. Non-employee directors also will receive an annual stock award of $55,000 paid in the form of TDS Special Common Shares, which will be distributed in March on or prior to March 15 of each year, for services performed during the 12 month period that commenced on March 1 of the immediately preceding calendar year and ended on the last day of February of the calendar year of payment. The number of shares will be determined on the basis of the closing price of TDS Special Common Shares for the last trading day in the month of February of each year.

        The Chairperson of the board of directors will receive an additional annual retainer fee of $45,000, paid in cash.

        Each non-employee director who serves on the Audit Committee, other than the Chairperson, will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $11,000, and the Chairperson will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $22,000.

        Each non-employee director who serves on the Compensation Committee, other than the Chairperson, will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $7,000, and the Chairperson will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $14,000.

        Each non-employee director who serves on the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, other than the Chairperson, will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $5,000, and the Chairperson will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $10,000.

92

        Non-employee directors also will receive a meeting fee of $1,750 for each board or committee meeting attended.

        Under the Directors Plan, annual retainers will be paid in cash on a quarterly basis, as of the last day of each quarter. Fees for all board and committee meetings will be paid in cash on a quarterly basis, as of the last day of each quarter.

        The Directors Plan approved by shareholders provides that directors have the authority without further shareholder approval to amend the Directors Plan from time to time, including amendments to increase the amount of the compensation payable in Special Common Shares from time to time, provided that the total number of Special Common Shares issued under the Plan may not exceed the amount previously approved by shareholders.

        The TDS board of directors reserved 125,000 Special Common Shares of TDS for issuance pursuant to the Directors Plan, of which approximately 70,500 Special Common Shares have been issued as of February 28, 2011.

        In addition, TDS pays life insurance premiums to provide life insurance of $100,000 for each of its directors. Except for life insurance coverage, directors who are employees of TDS or any affiliate do not receive fees or compensation for services rendered as directors. The compensation of directors who are named executive officers is disclosed in the tables under Executive and Director Compensation above.

        Directors are also reimbursed for travel and expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings, director education and other board or company related matters pursuant to TDS' travel and expense reimbursement policy. TDS also reimburses directors for the cost of attending director education programs.

        None of the directors had stock awards or option awards outstanding at fiscal year end.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        The Compensation Committee has responsibilities relating to the compensation of the executive officers of TDS (other than executive officers employed by U.S. Cellular or any of its subsidiaries), including the review of salary, bonus, long-term incentive compensation and all other compensation. The members of the Compensation Committee are Herbert S. Wander (chairperson), George W. Off, Christopher D. O'Leary and Gary L. Sugarman. Such persons are independent, as discussed above. None of such persons was, during 2010 or during any of the preceding three years, an officer or employee of TDS (or its affiliates), or had any relationship requiring disclosure by TDS under any paragraph of Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K.

        Long-term incentive compensation for executive officers who are employees of U.S. Cellular is approved by the long-term incentive compensation committee of U.S. Cellular. The long-term incentive compensation committee of U.S. Cellular is composed of directors of such subsidiary who are neither officers nor employees of TDS or any of its subsidiaries nor directors of TDS. The annual compensation of U.S. Cellular's President and Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Dillon, is approved by LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., the Chairman of U.S. Cellular. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. is also President and CEO of TDS. Mr. Carlson is a member of the board of directors of TDS, U.S. Cellular, and TDS Telecom. He is also the Chairman of TDS Telecom and, as such, approves the executive officer annual compensation decisions for TDS Telecom other than as they relate to the President and CEO of TDS Telecom, and recommends the annual compensation of the President and CEO of TDS Telecom to the TDS Compensation Committee. David A. Wittwer, deemed by SEC rules to be an executive officer of TDS, was the President and CEO of TDS Telecom in 2010. Mr. Carlson is compensated by TDS for his services to TDS and all its subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular. However, U.S. Cellular effectively reimburses TDS for a portion of such compensation as part of a management fee pursuant to an intercompany agreement between TDS and U.S. Cellular, as discussed above. Further information about the intercompany agreement is included in the proxy statement of U.S. Cellular for its 2011 Annual Meeting of shareholders.

93

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

        In addition to the above-described compensation committee interlocks and insider participation in compensation decisions, TDS and certain related parties are involved in the following relationships and transactions.

        The following persons are partners of Sidley Austin LLP, the principal law firm of TDS, U.S. Cellular and their subsidiaries: Walter C.D. Carlson, a trustee and beneficiary of the Voting Trust that controls TDS and U.S. Cellular, the non-executive Chairman of the Board and member of the board of directors of TDS and a director of U.S. Cellular; William S. DeCarlo, the General Counsel of TDS and an Assistant Secretary of TDS and certain subsidiaries of TDS; and Stephen P. Fitzell, the General Counsel and/or an Assistant Secretary of U.S. Cellular and certain subsidiaries of TDS. Mr. Carlson does not provide legal services to TDS, U.S. Cellular or their subsidiaries. TDS, U.S. Cellular and their subsidiaries incurred legal expenses from Sidley Austin LLP of $14.0 million in 2010, $13.8 million in 2009 and $12.0 million in 2008.

        On September 29, 2010, TDS repurchased 272,323 Special Common Shares at the then current market price on the NYSE for a total price of $7.7 million, or an average of $28.21 per Special Common Share including broker fees, from an affiliate of Southeastern Asset Management, Inc. ("SEAM"). At the time, SEAM was a shareholder of more than 5% of TDS Special Common Shares and continues to hold more than 5% of the Special Common Shares. See "Security Ownership by Certain Beneficial Owners" for further information about SEAM and its interest in TDS. This transaction was not solicited by TDS and TDS did not enter into any agreement with SEAM. The transaction was effected by TDS' broker pursuant to TDS' existing institutional brokerage account agreement on the NYSE pursuant to Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        The Audit Committee of the board of directors is responsible for the review and evaluation of all related party transactions, as such term is defined by the rules of the NYSE, except as they relate to LeRoy T. Carlson. As described below, transactions and arrangements as they relate to LeRoy T. Carlson are approved by the TDS Compensation Committee.

        LeRoy T. Carlson, Chairman Emeritus of TDS, is the father of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., a director and President and CEO of TDS, Walter C.D. Carlson, a director and non-executive Chairman of TDS, Letitia G. Carlson, M.D., a director of TDS, and Prudence E. Carlson, a director of TDS. Each of such children of LeRoy T. Carlson is also a trustee of the Voting Trust that controls TDS. Accordingly, even though he is not required to be included in the Summary Compensation Table as of December 31, 2010, because of such relationships, the following table summarizes the compensation paid by TDS in 2010 to LeRoy T. Carlson using the same rules as used in the Summary Compensation Table above. Although the following transactions and arrangements are being reported in this section as related party transactions under SEC rules, because such transactions and arrangements relate to compensation, they are approved by the TDS Compensation Committee pursuant to its charter rather than by the Audit Committee.

 
   Amount Earned in 2010  

Salary (1)

   $ 480,000  

Bonus(2)

     165,800  

Stock Awards (3)

     239,571  

Option Awards (4)

     333,783  

Excess Earnings on SERP (5)

     5,565  

All Other Compensation (6)

     28,644  
       

Total (7) (8)

   $ 1,253,363  
       
(1)
Represents the dollar value of base salary (cash and non-cash) earned by Mr. Carlson during 2010, whether or not paid in such year, none of which was deferred.

(2)
Represents the dollar value of bonus (cash and non-cash) earned by Mr. Carlson during 2010, whether or not paid in such year.

94

(3)
Includes the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 of $191,494 with respect to 7,500 Special Common Shares awarded in 2010 and the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 of $48,077 with respect to phantom stock bonus match units relating to 1,674 Special Common Shares awarded to Mr. Carlson in 2010 in connection with deferred bonus compensation. Mr. Carlson deferred 100% of his 2009 bonus paid in 2010 and, accordingly, received a stock unit match in phantom TDS Special Common Shares in 2010.

(4)
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 with respect to 39,900 Special Common Shares awarded in 2010.

(5)
See explanation under "Executive and Director Compensation" above.

(6)
Includes the following: (1) the total of perquisites and personal benefits if they equal or exceed $10,000 (representing corporate automobile allowance and other personal travel and related expenses and the tax gross up related thereto), and (2) contributions by TDS for the benefit of Mr. Carlson under the TDS Tax Deferred Savings Plan, which is referred to as the TDSP:

Total Perquisites if $10,000 or more

   $ 19,334  

TDSP

     9,310  
       
 

Total

   $ 28,644  
       
(7)
See the above "Executive and Director Compensation" section for a discussion of the terms of stock awards and options awarded in 2010, and information about other benefits and plans available to executive officers, including the Chairman Emeritus.

(8)
In addition, TDS has entered into an agreement, as amended, with LeRoy T. Carlson whereby it will employ Mr. Carlson until he elects to retire from TDS. Mr. Carlson is to be paid at least $60,000 per annum until his retirement. The agreement also provides that upon his retirement, Mr. Carlson will be retained by TDS as a part-time consultant (for not more than 60 hours in any month) until his death. Upon his retirement, Mr. Carlson will receive $75,000 per annum as a consultant, plus increments beginning in 1985 equal to the greater of three percent of his consulting fee or two-thirds of the percentage increase in the consumer price index for the Chicago metropolitan area. If Mr. Carlson becomes disabled before retiring, TDS can elect to discontinue his employment and retain him in accordance with the consulting arrangement described above. Upon Mr. Carlson's death (unless his death follows his voluntary termination of the consulting arrangement), his widow will receive until her death an amount equal to that which Mr. Carlson would have received as a consultant. TDS may terminate payments under the agreement if Mr. Carlson becomes the owner of more than 21% of the stock, or becomes an officer, director, employee or paid agent of any competitor of TDS within the continental United States. No amounts have ever been paid or become payable under this agreement. Any amounts that become payable under this agreement may be subject to the six-month payment delay required by section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Carlson would receive approximately $168,000 in 2011 assuming he began receiving such payments after December 31, 2010. This amount represents $75,000, plus increments beginning in 1985 equal to the greater of three percent of his consulting fee or two-thirds of the percentage increase in the consumer price index for the Chicago metropolitan area through 2010. This amount would increase on an annual basis at December 31, 2011 and each year thereafter at increments equal to the greater of three percent of his consulting fee or two-thirds of the percentage increase in the consumer price index for the Chicago metropolitan area until such payments ceased pursuant to the foregoing agreement. Reference is made to TDS' Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 2-92307) for a copy of this agreement and to TDS' Form 8-K dated December 22, 2009 for an amendment to this agreement.

95


 SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

        The following table provides information as of December 31, 2010 regarding TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares that may be issued under equity compensation plans currently maintained by TDS.

Plan Category
  (a)
Number of securities to be
issued upon the exercise
of outstanding options
and rights 		  (b)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
and rights 		  (c)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a)) 		 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1):

                    
 

TDS Common Shares

     N/A     N/A     1,258,819  
 

Tandem TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares

     698,782   $ 69.60     N/A  
 

TDS Special Common Shares

     5,513,657   $ 35.41     3,044,956  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:

     -0-     N/A     -0-  

Total:

                    
 

TDS Common Shares

     N/A     N/A     1,258,819  
 

Tandem TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares

     698,782   $ 69.60     N/A  
 

TDS Special Common Shares

     5,513,657   $ 35.41     3,044,956  

Explanation of Columns:

(a)
Represents the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or pursuant to unvested restricted stock units and vested and unvested phantom stock units.

(b)
Represents the weighted-average exercise price of all outstanding options, warrants and rights, including tandem options and TDS Special Common Share options. Restricted stock units and phantom stock units do not have any exercise price.

(c)
Represents the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the plan, other than securities to be issued upon the exercise of the outstanding options or pursuant to restricted stock units and phantom stock units disclosed in column (a).

Footnotes:

(1)
This includes the following plans that have been approved by TDS shareholders:

Plan
  Number of securities to be
issued upon the exercise
of outstanding options
and rights 		  Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance (excluding
securities reflected in
prior column) 		  Total  

2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan:

                    
 

TDS Common Shares

     N/A     1,258,819     1,258,819  
 

Tandem TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares

     698,782     N/A     698,782  
 

TDS Special Common Shares

     5,513,657     2,911,298     8,424,955  

2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan:

                    
 

TDS Special Common Shares

     -0-     60,574     60,574  

Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors:

                    
 

TDS Special Common Shares

     -0-     73,084     73,084  

Total:

                    
 

TDS Common Shares

     N/A     1,258,819     1,258,819  
 

Tandem TDS Common Shares and TDS Special Common Shares

     698,782     N/A     698,782  
 

TDS Special Common Shares

     5,513,657     3,044,956     8,558,613  

96


 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

        On February 28, 2011, TDS had outstanding and entitled to vote 49,896,812 Common Shares, par value $.01 per share (excluding 6,711,689 Common Shares held by TDS and 484,012 Common Shares held by a subsidiary of TDS), 47,481,797 Special Common Shares, par value $.01 per share (excluding 15,476,615 Special Common Shares held by TDS and 484,012 Special Common Shares held by a subsidiary of TDS), and 6,509,968 Series A Common Shares, par value $.01 per share (collectively representing a total of 103,888,577 shares of common stock); and 8,300 Preferred Shares, par value $.01 per share.

        Each of the Common Shares and Preferred Shares is entitled to one vote and each of the Series A Common Shares is entitled to ten votes. Accordingly, the total voting power of the Series A Common Shares was 65,099,680 votes at February 28, 2011 with respect to matters other than the election of directors. The total voting power of the Common Shares was 49,896,812 votes at February 28, 2011 with respect to matters other than the election of directors. The total voting power of all outstanding shares of all classes of capital stock was 115,004,792 votes at February 28, 2011 with respect to matters other than the election of directors, including 8,300 votes by holders of Preferred Shares.

        Other than as required by law, holders of Special Common Shares do not have any right to vote on any matters except in the election of certain directors. In the election of directors, the holders of Special Common Shares vote together with the holders of Common Shares in the election of 25% of the directors rounded up plus one director (or four of the twelve present directors), and the holders of Series A Common Shares and Preferred Shares, voting as a group, are entitled to elect the remaining members of the board of directors of TDS.

        In the election of four of the directors, each of the Special Common Shares and Common Shares is entitled to one vote. As of February 28, 2011, the voting power of the Special Common Shares was 47,481,797 votes and the voting power of the Common Shares was 49,896,812 votes, or a total of 97,378,609 votes, with respect to the election of such four directors.

        For purposes of the following tables, percentages are calculated pursuant to SEC Rule 13d-3(d)(1). Under such rule, shares underlying options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2011, restricted stock units that become vested within 60 days after February 28, 2011 and vested phantom stock units are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number of shares owned and percentages of shares and voting power with respect to the person holding such options, restricted stock units or phantom stock units, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentages of shares or voting power of other persons.

Security Ownership of Management

        The following table sets forth as of February 28, 2011, or the latest practicable date, the number of Common Shares, Special Common Shares and Series A Common Shares beneficially owned, and the percentage of the outstanding shares of each such class so owned, by each director and nominee for director of TDS, by each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table and by all directors and executive officers as a group. As of February 28, 2011 or the latest practicable date, none of the directors or executive officers of TDS beneficially owned Preferred Shares.

97

Name of Individual or Number of
Persons in Group
  Title of Class or Series   Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(1) 		  Percent of
Class or
Series 		  Percent of
Shares of
Common Stock 		  Percent of
Voting
Power(2) 		 

LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Walter C.D. Carlson, Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. and Prudence E. Carlson(3)

   Special Common Shares     6,083,574   12.8%   5.9%     —  

  Series A Common Shares     6,159,631   94.6%   5.9%     53.6 %

LeRoy T. Carlson(4)(11)

  

Common Shares

    
205,104		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     334,969   *   *     —  

  Series A Common Shares     55,427   *   *     *  

LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.(5)(11)

  

Common Shares

    
369,807		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     1,063,863   2.2%   *     —  

  Series A Common Shares     18,481   *   *     *  

Walter C.D. Carlson(6)

  

Common Shares

    
6,086		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     14,590   *   *     —  

  Series A Common Shares     918   *   *     *  

Letitia G. Carlson, M.D.(7)

  

Common Shares

    
2,203		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     9,981   *   *     —  

  Series A Common Shares     991   *   *     *  

Prudence E. Carlson (8)

  

Common Shares

    
11		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     49,693   *   *     —  

  Series A Common Shares     179,280   2.8%   *     1.6 %

Kenneth R. Meyers(9)(11)

  

Common Shares

    
4,014		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     188,683   *   *     —  

Donald C. Nebergall(10)

  

Common Shares

    
3,449		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     11,530   *   *     —  

  Series A Common Shares     1,099   *   *     *  

Herbert S. Wander

  

Common Shares

    
3,159		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     9,979   *   *     —  

George W. Off

  

Common Shares

    
4,391		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     11,280   *   *     —  

Christopher D. O'Leary

  

Common Shares

    
—		  
—		  
—		    
—		  

  Special Common Shares     6,897   *   *     —  

Mitchell H. Saranow

  

Common Shares

    
1,926		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     8,738   *   *     —  

Clarence A. Davis(12)

  

Common Shares

    
—		  
—		  
—		    
—		  

  Special Common Shares     3,793   *   *     —  

Gary L. Sugarman

  

Common Shares

    
—		  
—		  
—		    
—		  

  Special Common Shares     3,793   *   *     —  

Mary N. Dillon

  

Common Shares

    
—		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     —   *   *     —  

Scott H. Williamson(11)

  

Common Shares

    
37,734		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     257,818   *   *     —  

David A. Wittwer(9)(11)

  

Common Shares

    
1,441		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     164,685   *   *     —  

Other executive officers(9)(11)(13)

  

Common Shares

    
87,342		  
*		  
*		    
*		  

  Special Common Shares     293,065   *   *     —  

  Series A Common Shares     —   —   —     —  

All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)(9)(11)

   Common Shares     726,667   1.5%   *     *  

  Special Common Shares     8,516,931   17.9%   8.2%     —  

  Series A Common Shares     6,415,827   98.6%   6.2%     55.8 %
*
Less than 1%

(1)
The nature of beneficial ownership for shares in this column is sole voting and investment power, except as otherwise set forth in these footnotes. Except with respect to customary brokerage agreement terms pursuant to which shares in a brokerage account are pledged as collateral security for the repayment of debit balances, none of the above shares are pledged as security, unless otherwise specified.

98

(2)
Represents the percent of voting power in matters other than the election of directors.

(3)
The shares listed are held by the persons named as trustees under the TDS Voting Trust which expires June 30, 2035, created to facilitate long-standing relationships among the trust certificate holders. The trustees share voting and investment power. The address of the trustees of the TDS Voting Trust in their capacities as such is c/o LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., 30 N. LaSalle St., Suite 4000, Chicago, IL 60602. Under the terms of the TDS Voting Trust, the trustees hold and vote the Special Common Shares and Series A Common Shares held in the trust. If the TDS Voting Trust were terminated, the following individuals, directly or indirectly with their spouses, would each be deemed to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding Series A Common Shares: LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Walter C.D. Carlson, Prudence E. Carlson and Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. The above numbers of shares and percentages do not assume conversion of the TDS Series A Common Shares because the trustees have advised TDS that the TDS Voting Trust has no intention of converting its Series A Common Shares.

(4)
Includes 9,471 Special Common Shares and 55,427 Series A Common Shares held by Mr. Carlson's wife. Does not include 29,364 Special Common Shares and 33,313 Series A Common Shares held for the benefit of LeRoy T. Carlson or 189,871 Special Common Shares and 190,786 Series A Common Shares held for the benefit of Mr. Carlson's wife (an aggregate of 219,235 Special Common Shares, or 0.5% of class, and 224,099 Series A Common Shares, or 3.4% of class) in the TDS Voting Trust described in footnote (3).

(5)
Includes 1,158 Common Shares, 6,444 Special Common Shares and 5,283 Series A Common Shares held by Mr. Carlson's wife outside the TDS Voting Trust. Also includes 1,634 TDS Special Common Shares held by Mr. Carlson's children.

Special Common Shares in TDS Voting Trust.    Does not include (i)1,128,832 Special Common Shares (2.4% of class) held in the TDS Voting Trust described in footnote (3) for the benefit of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., his spouse and/or their descendants (individually or through family partnerships, grantor retained annuity trusts, custodial arrangements and otherwise), of which 705,648 shares are held for the benefit of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., or (ii) 685,645 shares (1.4% of class) held by a family partnership in such TDS Voting Trust for the benefit of descendants and family members of LeRoy T. Carlson and his spouse, of which LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. is a general partner.

Series A Common Shares in TDS Voting Trust.    Does not include (i) 1,131,504 Series A Common Shares (17.4% of class) held in the TDS Voting Trust described in footnote (3) for the benefit of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., his spouse and/or their descendants (individually or through family partnerships, grantor retained annuity trusts, custodial arrangements and otherwise), of which 175,074 shares are held for the benefit of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., or (ii) 687,023 shares (10.6% of class) held by a family partnership in such TDS Voting Trust for the benefit of descendants and family members of LeRoy T. Carlson and his spouse, of which LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. is a general partner.

(6)
Special Common Shares in TDS Voting Trust.    Does not include (i) 1,217,486 Special Common Shares (2.6% of class) held in the TDS Voting Trust described in footnote (3) for the benefit of Walter C.D. Carlson, his spouse and/or their descendants (individually or through family partnerships, grantor retained annuity trusts, custodial arrangements and otherwise), of which 1,097,390 shares are held for the benefit of Walter C.D. Carlson, or (ii) 685,645 shares (1.4% of class) held by a family partnership in such TDS Voting Trust for the benefit of descendants and family members of LeRoy T. Carlson and his spouse, of which Walter C.D. Carlson is a general partner.

Series A Common Shares in TDS Voting Trust.    Does not include (i) 1,259,015 Series A Common Shares (19.3% of class) held in the TDS Voting Trust described in footnote (3) for the benefit of Walter C.D. Carlson, his spouse and/or their descendants (individually or through family partnerships, grantor retained annuity trusts, custodial arrangements and otherwise), of which 1,136,537 shares are held for the benefit of Walter C.D. Carlson, or (ii) 687,023 shares (10.6% of class) held by a family partnership in such TDS Voting Trust for the benefit of descendants and family members of LeRoy T. Carlson and his spouse, of which Walter C.D. Carlson is a general partner.

(7)
Special Common Shares in TDS Voting Trust.    Does not include (i) 1,154,348 Special Common Shares (2.4% of class) held in the TDS Voting Trust described in footnote (3) for the benefit of Letitia G. Carlson, M.D., her spouse and/or their descendants (individually or through family partnerships, grantor retained annuity trusts, custodial arrangements and otherwise), of which 1,056,660 shares are held for the benefit of Letitia G. Carlson, M.D., or (ii) 685,645 shares (1.4% of class) held by a family partnership in such TDS Voting Trust for the benefit of descendants and family members of LeRoy T. Carlson and his spouse, of which Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. is a general partner.

Series A Common Shares in TDS Voting Trust.    Does not include (i) 1,159,059 Series A Common Shares (17.8% of class) held in the TDS Voting Trust described in footnote (3) for the benefit of Letitia G. Carlson, M.D., her spouse and/or their descendants (individually or through family partnerships, grantor retained annuity trusts, custodial arrangements and otherwise), of which 1,047,887 shares are held for the benefit of Letitia G. Carlson, M.D., or (ii) 687,023 shares (10.6% of class) held by a family partnership in such TDS Voting Trust for the

99

(8)
Special Common Shares in TDS Voting Trust.    Does not include (i) 1,032,788 Special Common Shares (2.2% of class) held in the TDS Voting Trust described in footnote (3) for the benefit of Prudence E. Carlson, her spouse and/or their descendants (individually or through family partnerships, grantor retained annuity trusts, custodial arrangements and otherwise), of which 999,227 shares are held for the benefit of Prudence E. Carlson, or (ii) 685,645 shares (1.4% of class) held by a family partnership in such TDS Voting Trust for the benefit of descendants and family members of LeRoy T. Carlson and his spouse, of which Prudence E. Carlson is a general partner.

Series A Common Shares in TDS Voting Trust.    Does not include (i) 1,032,631 Series A Common Shares (15.9% of class) held in the TDS Voting Trust described in footnote (3) for the benefit of Prudence E. Carlson, her spouse and/or their descendants (individually or through family partnerships, grantor retained annuity trusts, custodial arrangements and otherwise), or (ii) 687,023 shares (10.6% of class) held by a family partnership in such TDS Voting Trust for the benefit of descendants and family members of LeRoy T. Carlson and his spouse, of which Prudence E. Carlson is a general partner.

(9)
Includes shares as to which voting and/or investment power is shared, and/or shares held by spouse and/or children.

(10)
Does not include shares held in the TDS Voting Trust, which are included in the shares described in footnote (3), that are reported by the TDS Voting Trust: 301 Special Common Shares and 299 Series A Common Shares held for the benefit of Donald C. Nebergall; 1,425 Special Common Shares and 1,416 Series A Common Shares held for the benefit of Mr. Nebergall's wife; 463,300 Special Common Shares (1.0% of class) and 461,124 Series A Common Shares (7.1% of class) held by Mr. Nebergall as trustee under trusts ("Trusts") for the benefit of the heirs of LeRoy T. Carlson (Chairman Emeritus of TDS) and his wife, Margaret D. Carlson, which heirs include LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. (director and President and CEO of TDS), Walter C.D. Carlson (director and non-executive Chairman of the Board of TDS), Letitia G. Carlson, M.D. (director of TDS), Prudence E. Carlson (director of TDS) and/or their heirs. In addition, Mr. Nebergall holds 31 Common Shares and 10 Special Common Shares for the Trusts outside of the TDS Voting Trust. All shares held under the Trusts are held by Mr. Nebergall as a trustee in a fiduciary capacity, and he has no beneficial interest in such shares. Since the creation of the Trusts, Mr. Nebergall has withdrawn $1,000 per year from each trust in compensation for his services as trustee. These are not arrangements with or compensation from TDS or any other member of the TDS Consolidated Group.

(11)
Includes the following number of Common Shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options and/or restricted stock units which are currently vested or will vest within 60 days: LeRoy T. Carlson, 110,371 shares; LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., 341,796 shares; Kenneth R. Meyers, 0 shares; Scott H. Williamson, 32,183 shares; David A. Wittwer, 1,441 shares; all other executive officers, 45,086 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group, 530,877 shares. Includes the following number of Special Common Shares that may be acquired pursuant to stock options and/or restricted stock units which are currently vested or will vest within 60 days: LeRoy T. Carlson, 249,346 shares; LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., 967,065 shares; Kenneth R. Meyers, 158,075 shares; Scott H. Williamson, 240,202 shares; David A. Wittwer, 155,381 shares; all other executive officers, 44,764 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group, 1,814,833 shares. Includes the following number of Common Shares underlying vested phantom stock units: LeRoy T. Carlson, 31,554 shares; LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., 12,787 shares; Kenneth R. Meyers, 0 shares; Scott H. Williamson, 0 shares; David A. Wittwer, 0 shares; all other executive officers, 0 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group, 44,341 shares. Includes the following number of Special Common Shares underlying vested phantom stock units: LeRoy T. Carlson, 66,099 shares; LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., 33,290 shares; Kenneth R. Meyers, 10,403 shares; Scott H. Williamson, 0 shares; David A. Wittwer, 0 shares; all other executive officers, 2,607 shares; and all executive directors and executive officers as a group, 112,399 shares.

(12)
Mr. Davis is a director of the Gabelli SRI Fund and the Gabelli Global Deal Fund. The above does not include TDS shares owned by such funds, if any. As of the latest available information, neither the Gabelli SRI Fund nor the Gabelli Global Deal Fund owns any TDS shares.

(13)
Includes shares held by the other executive officers identified in "Executive Officers" above: Douglas D. Shuma, Kurt B. Thaus, C. Theodore Herbert and Joseph R. Hanley.

100

Security Ownership by Certain Beneficial Owners

        In addition to persons listed in the preceding table and the footnotes thereto, the following table sets forth as of February 28, 2011 or the latest practicable date, information regarding each person who is known to TDS to own beneficially more than 5% of any class of voting securities of TDS, based on publicly available information and TDS' stock records as of such date. The nature of beneficial ownership in this table is sole voting and investment power except as otherwise set forth in footnotes thereto.

Shareholder's Name and Address   Title of Class or Series   Shares of Class
or Series
Owned 		  Percent of
Class 		  Percent of
Shares of
Common Stock 		  Percent of
Voting
Power(1) 		 

Capital Research Global
Investors (2)(3)(5)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
 
Common Shares
 
 
4,626,600
 
 
9.3
%
 
4.5
%
 
4.0
%
    Special Common Shares     4,337,400     9.1 %   4.2 %   —  

Capital World Investors (4)(5)
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
 
Special Common Shares
 
 
3,493,100
 
 
7.4
%
 
3.4
%
 
—
 
                             

Total for Capital Research and Management Company (5)
 
 
 
 
12,457,100
 
 
N/A
 
 
12.0
%
 
4.0
%
                             
Southeastern Asset
Management, Inc. (6)(7)
6410 Poplar Ave., Suite 900
Memphis, TN 38119		   Special Common Shares     9,633,778     20.3 %   9.3 %   —  
                             

GAMCO Investors, Inc. (8)(9)
One Corporate Center
Rye, NY 10580
 
Common Shares
 
 
4,878,156
 
 
9.8
%
 
4.7
%
 
4.2
%
    Special Common Shares     3,390,996     7.1 %   3.3 %   —  
                             
    Total     8,269,152     N/A     8.0 %   4.2 %
                             

BlackRock, Inc. (10)
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
 
Common Shares
 
 
6,451,246
 
 
12.9
%
 
6.2
%
 
5.6
%
                             

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (11)(12)
100 E. Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202
 
Common Shares
 
 
1,401,400
 
 
2.8
%
 
1.3
%
 
1.2
%
    Special Common Shares     2,685,888     5.7 %   2.6 %   —  
                             
          4,087,288     N/A     3.9 %   1.2 %
                             
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (13)
270 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017		   Special Common Shares     3,603,464     7.6 %   3.5 %   —  
                             

Anchor Capital Advisors LLC (14)
One Post Office Square
Boston, MA 02109
 
Special Common Shares
 
 
2,914,370
 
 
6.1
%
 
2.8
%
 
—
 
                             

Wallace R. Weitz & Company (15)
1125 South 103rd Street,
Suite 600
Omaha, NE 68124-6008
 
Special Common Shares
 
 
2,728,200
 
 
6.7
%
 
2.6
%
 
—
 
                             
(1)
Represents voting power in matters other than election of directors.

(2)
Based on the most recent Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 3) filed with the SEC. In such Schedule 13G, Capital Research Global Investors reports that it has sole power to vote or direct the vote of, and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of, 4,626,600 Common Shares.

101

(3)
Based on the most recent Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 3) filed with the SEC. In such Schedule 13G, Capital Research Global Investors reports that it has sole power to vote or direct the vote of, and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of, 4,337,400 Special Common Shares.

(4)
Based on the most recent Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 3) filed with the SEC. In such Schedule 13G, Capital World Investors reports that it has sole power to vote or direct the vote of, and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of, 3,493,100 Special Common Shares.

(5)
Based on the most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, Capital Research Global Investors and Capital World Investors are both divisions of Capital Research and Management Company, 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

(6)
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, Southeastern Asset Management reports that it has sole power to vote or direct the vote of 2,822,730 Special Common Shares and shared power to vote 5,666,200 Special Common Shares and no power to vote with respect to 1,144,848 Special Common Shares. Southeastern Asset Management reports that it has sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 3,967,578 Special Common Shares and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 5,666,200 Special Common Shares. The Special Common Shares for which voting and dispositive power is shared are owned by Longleaf Partners Fund.

(7)
Although Southeastern Asset Management previously beneficially owned more than 5% of the Common Shares, it filed a Schedule 13D reporting that it no longer owns more than 5% of the Common Shares and has not filed any subsequent amendment to such Schedule 13D or a Schedule 13G reporting the amount of Common Shares that it may currently own.

(8)
Based on a Schedule 13D (Amendment No. 21) filed with the SEC. Includes Common Shares held by the following affiliates: GAMCO Asset Management, Inc.—3,118,956 Common Shares; Gabelli Funds, LLC—1,689,200 Common Shares; GGCP, Inc.—6,000 Common Shares; MJG Associates, Inc.—7,000 Common Shares; Mario J. Gabelli—45,500 Common Shares; and Gabelli Securities, Inc.—11,500 Common Shares. In such Schedule 13D, such group reports sole voting power with respect to 4,767,656 Common Shares and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 4,878,156 Common Shares.

(9)
Based on a Schedule 13D (Amendment No. 2) filed with the SEC. Includes Special Common Shares held by the following affiliates: Gabelli Funds, LLC—1,235,300 Special Common Shares; GAMCO Asset Management, Inc.—2,125,696 Special Common Shares; GGCP, Inc.—4,000 Special Common Shares; Mario J. Gabelli—2,500 Special Common Shares; and Gabelli Securities, Inc.—13,500 Special Common Shares. In such Schedule 13D, such group reports sole voting power with respect to 3,310,196 Special Common Shares and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 3,390,996 Special Common Shares.

(10)
Based on the most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, BlackRock, Inc. reports that it has sole power to vote or direct the vote of, and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of, 6,451,246 Common Shares.

(11)
Based on the most recent Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 1) filed with the SEC. Includes Common Shares held by the following affiliates: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reports sole voting authority over 602,200 Common Shares and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 989,290 Common Shares; T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund, Inc. reports sole voting authority over 799,200 Common Shares.

(12)
Based on the most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. reports that it has sole power to vote 429,400 Special Common Shares and sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 2,685,888 Special Common Shares.

(13)
Based on the most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reports that it has sole power to vote or direct the vote of 3,193,082 Special Common Shares and shared power to vote or direct the vote of 260,073 Special Common Shares. JPMorgan Chase & Co. reports that it has sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 3,341,253 Special Common Shares and shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 262,211 Special Common Shares.

(14)
Based on the most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, Anchor Capital Advisors LLC reports that it has sole power to vote or direct the vote of, and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of, 2,914,370 Special Common Shares.

(15)
Based on a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC, Wallace R. Weitz & Company reports that it has sole or shared power to vote or direct the vote of, and sole or shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of, 2,728,200 Special Common Shares.

102


 SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder require TDS' directors and officers, and persons who are deemed to own more than ten percent of the Common Shares, to file certain reports with the SEC with respect to their beneficial ownership of Common Shares. The reporting persons are also required to furnish TDS with copies of all such reports they file.

        Based on a review of copies of such reports furnished to TDS by the reporting persons and written representations by directors and officers of TDS, TDS believes that all filing requirements under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act applicable to the reporting persons during and with respect to 2010 were complied with on a timely basis.


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

        See "Executive and Director Compensation—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" above.


PROPOSAL 5
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL THAT IS OPPOSED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

        A person who purports to be the beneficial holder of 600 TDS Common Shares has advised TDS that he intends to have his proxy introduce the proposal set forth below at the TDS 2011 Annual Meeting. The name and address of such shareholder is Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Avenue, 2M, Great Neck, NY 11021. Mr. Steiner has appointed John Chevedden of 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278 and/or Mr. Chevedden's designee to act on his behalf in matters relating to the proposal. The below shareholder proposal and related supporting statement represent the views of the shareholder who submitted it, and not the views of TDS. TDS is not responsible for the content of the following shareholder proposal or supporting statement. TDS does not endorse the shareholder proposal or supporting statement, which are required to be included in this Proxy Statement pursuant to rules established by the SEC. The shareholder proposal and supporting statement have been included below verbatim as supplied by the shareholder and TDS declines to comment on any of the statements therein. For the reasons discussed below the shareholder proposal, the TDS board of directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST the following proposal:


"5—Equal Shareholder Voting

        RESOLVED: Shareholders request that our Board take steps to adopt a plan for all of our company's outstanding stock to have one-vote per share. This would include all practicable steps including encouragement and negotiation with family shareholders to request that they relinquish, for the common good of all shareholders, any preexisting rights, if necessary.

        This proposal is not intended to unnecessarily limit our Board's judgment in crafting the requested change in accordance with applicable laws and existing contracts. This proposal is important because certain shares not owned by the general public have super-sized voting power with 10-votes per share compared to one-vote per share.

        The danger of giving disproportionate power to insiders is illustrated by Adelphia Communications. Adelphia's dual-class voting stock gave the Rigas family control and contributed to Adelphia's participation in "one of the most extensive financial frauds ever to take place at a public company." See Securities and Exchange Commission Litigation Release No. 17627 (July 24, 2002).

        The SEC alleged that Adelphia fraudulently excluded more than $2 billion in bank debt from its financial statements and concealed "rampant self-dealing by the Rigas Family." Meanwhile, the price of Adelphia stock collapsed from $20 to 79¢ in two-years.

        With stock having 10-times more voting power our company takes our public shareholder money but does not let us have an equal voice in our company's management. Without a voice, shareholders cannot hold management accountable.

103

        The merit of this Equal Shareholder Voting proposal should also be considered in the context of the need for additional improvement in our company's 2010 reported corporate governance status.

        Please encourage our board to respond positively to this proposal for Equal Shareholder Voting—Yes on 5."

TDS BOARD OF DIRECTORS' STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSAL 5

        The TDS board of directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the following reasons:

        The implementation of the shareholder proposal would require an amendment of the TDS Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended. To be approved thereunder and under Delaware law, such an amendment would require, among other things, approval by a majority of the voting power of all shares of capital stock entitled to vote for matters other than the election of directors, voting as a group, as well as by a majority of the outstanding TDS Series A Common Shares voting as a class. As of February 28, 2011, the TDS Voting Trust holds 6,159,631 Series A Common Shares, representing 5.9% of all shares of TDS common stock, and 6,083,574 TDS Special Common Shares, representing 5.9% of all shares of TDS common stock, for a total economic interest of 11.8% in TDS. By reason of such holdings, the TDS Voting Trust owns a majority (94.6%) of the outstanding TDS Series A Common Shares and, because the Series A Common Shares have 10 votes per share, a majority (53.6%) of the voting power of all shares of capital stock entitled to vote for matters other than the election of directors.

        Dual or multiple class capital structures are recognized and valid under applicable federal and corporate law and stock exchange regulations and are not uncommon among public companies. Various companies have had dual or multiple class capital structures for many years and companies continue to implement dual or multiple class capital structures.

        The common equity of TDS has included different classes of high and low vote common stock since TDS became a public company in 1981. TDS has clearly and consistently disclosed in its Risk Factors in its Form 10-K the impact of the differences in voting rights, particularly with regard to any potential takeover attempt. Purchasers of TDS Common Shares and Special Common Shares, including the proponent of the shareholder proposal, therefore bought shares of TDS with full knowledge of the differences in the voting rights of the shares. Holders of Common Shares and Special Common Shares also have no basis for anticipating the possibility of any action that would reduce the voting power of the TDS Series A Common Shares. As stated in the Risk Factors set forth in TDS' Form 10-K, the TDS Voting Trust has advised TDS that it intends to maintain the ability to keep or dispose of voting control of TDS.

        The TDS Voting Trust also has advised the TDS board of directors that it (i) opposes and will vote against the shareholder proposal and (ii) will not vote in favor of or support any action to implement the shareholder proposal or any other action that would dilute its voting control of TDS. Considering all of the foregoing factors, the TDS board of directors has determined that action in furtherance of the proposal would serve no useful purpose and accordingly opposes the proposal and recommends that shareholders vote against it.

        Finally, it should be noted that under SEC rules, in addition to the above shareholder proposal, TDS is also required to include the shareholder's supporting statement in the TDS Proxy Statement. This has been included above verbatim as supplied by the shareholder. TDS is not the author of the shareholder's supporting statement and declines to comment on any of the statements therein.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY OPPOSES THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL AND RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "AGAINST" PROPOSAL 5.

104


 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

        The 2012 Annual Meeting of shareholders is currently scheduled for May 17, 2012, and the proxy statement for such meeting is expected to be dated on or about April 15, 2012.

        Pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8, proposals by shareholders intended to be included in TDS' proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2012 Annual Meeting of shareholders must be received by TDS at its principal executive offices not later than December 16, 2011 (120 calendar days before the anniversary date of this proxy statement of April 14, 2011). However, if the date of the 2012 Annual Meeting changes for any reason by more than 30 days from the date of the 2011 Annual Meeting, then the deadline will be a reasonable time before TDS begins to print and send its proxy materials. In such event, TDS would disclose such date in a Form 8-K, 10-Q or 10-K at the appropriate time.

        In addition, pursuant to TDS' bylaws, proposals by shareholders intended to be presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of shareholders (other than proposals included in TDS' proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2012 Annual Meeting pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8), must be received by TDS at its principal executive offices not earlier than January 20, 2012 and not later than February 17, 2012 for consideration at the 2012 Annual Meeting of shareholders (120 calendar days and 90 days, respectively, before the anniversary date of the 2011 Annual Meeting of May 19, 2011 except that, because the 90th day falls on a Sunday, the deadline pursuant to the bylaws is the immediately preceding Friday, February 17, 2012). However, if the 2012 Annual Meeting is changed by more than 30 calendar days before or after May 19, 2012 (the anniversary date of the 2011 Annual Meeting), different provisions will apply as set forth in the TDS bylaws.

        Pursuant to SEC rules, the proxy solicited by the board of directors for the 2012 Annual Meeting will confer discretionary authority to vote on any matter that may properly come before such meeting or any adjournment thereof, other than with respect to proposals that are duly submitted pursuant to the foregoing requirements and/or that are included in the proxy statement.


SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

        Your proxy is being solicited by the board of directors and its agents, and the cost of solicitation will be paid by TDS. Officers, directors and regular employees of TDS, acting on its behalf, may also solicit proxies by mail, email, advertisement, telephone, telecopy, press release, employee communication, postings on TDS' Internet website and Intranet website or in person. We will not pay such persons additional compensation for their proxy solicitation efforts. TDS has also retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies. The standard fee charged by MacKenzie Partners, Inc. for proxy solicitation in connection with an Annual Meeting is $10,000 plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. TDS will, at its expense, request brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons.


FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

        We will furnish you or any shareholder as of the record date without charge a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, including the financial statements and the schedules thereto, upon written or oral request, and will provide copies of the exhibits to any such documents upon payment of a reasonable fee which shall not exceed our reasonable expenses incurred to do so. Requests for such materials should be directed to Investor Relations, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., 30 North LaSalle Street, 40th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60602, telephone (312) 630-1900.

        In addition, to the extent that, as permitted by SEC rules, TDS delivers only one copy of an annual report to shareholders, proxy statement or notice of internet availability of proxy materials to an address that is shared by separate persons who are shareholders (addressed to such shareholders as a group), TDS shall deliver promptly additional copies of any of such documents to any shareholder located at such shared address upon written or oral request by such shareholder.

105


 OTHER BUSINESS

        It is not anticipated that any action will be asked of the shareholders other than those set forth above, but if other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment.

  By order of the Board of Directors

 
 
SIG

  Kevin C. Gallagher
 Vice President and Corporate Secretary

        All shareholders are urged to sign, date and mail their proxy card(s) promptly or vote on the Internet in accordance with the instructions set forth on the proxy card(s)

106

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X 01BFSB 1 U PX + Annual Meeting Proxy Card - Common Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below C NOTE: Please sign your name(s) EXACTLY as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. All joint holders must sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or corporate officer, please provide your FULL title. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. + A 01 - C. A. Davis 04 - H. S. Wander 02 - C. D. O’Leary 03 - G. L. Sugarman For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold B Change of Address — Please print new address below. Proposals — The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR its nominees in Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2 and 3, EVERY YEAR (1 Yr) in Proposal 4 and AGAINST Proposal 5. 1. Election of Directors: For Against Abstain 2. Ratify Accountants for 2011. 6. In accordance with their discretion, to vote upon all other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof, including matters incidental to the conduct of the meeting. For Against Abstain 3. Advisory vote on executive compensation. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION For Against Abstain 5. Shareholder proposal to recapitalize TDS’ outstanding stock. 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs Abstain 4. Advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation. 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 1 1 3 9 7 7 1 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND C 1234567890 J N T C123456789 1234 5678 9012 345 000004 MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 ENDORSEMENT_LINE SACKPACK IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Electronic Voting Instructions You can vote by Internet! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose the voting method outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 19, 2011. Vote by Internet • Log on to the Internet and go to www.investorvote.com • Follow the steps outlined on the secured website.

 

Proxy for Common Shares Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. To Be Held May 19, 2011 The undersigned hereby appoints Walter C.D. Carlson and LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., or either of them acting in the absence of the other, with power of substitution, attorneys and proxies for and in the name and place of the undersigned, to vote the number of Common Shares that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then personally present at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., to be held on Thursday, May 19, 2011, or at any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof, as set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement. The undersigned hereby revokes any and all other proxies heretofore given by the undersigned to vote at such 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” its nominees in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3, “EVERY YEAR” in Proposal 4 and “AGAINST” Proposal 5. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed on the reverse side hereof. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” the nominees in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3 and “EVERY YEAR” in Proposal 4 (which have been proposed by the Board of Directors) and “AGAINST” Proposal 5 (which has been proposed by a shareholder). If a nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the persons named in this proxy shall have discretionary authority to vote for a substitute nominee if one is designated by the Board of Directors (unless authority to vote for nominees has been withheld). Whether or not you are able to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, it is important that your shares be represented. Accordingly, please complete and sign the proxy card, and mail the card in the enclosed postage paid envelope addressed to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., c/o Computershare Trust Company, N.A. If “401K” is indicated next to the share amount on the reverse side, this is a ballot for voting the shares of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. stock allocated to your TDS Tax-Deferred Savings Plan (“401(k) Plan”) account. Indicate your voting instructions for the proposal on the ballot, sign and date it, and return it in the envelope provided. Your ballot must be received on or before May 17, 2011 in order to be counted. Your voting instructions will be kept confidential. If you properly sign and return your ballot, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, as Trustee of the 401(k) Plan, will vote your shares according to your instructions. If this voting instruction card is not properly completed and signed, or if it is not timely received by the designated tabulator, shares allocated to your account for the TDS 401(k) Plan will be voted as directed by the Investment Management Committee for the TDS 401(k) Plan, which shall act in the best interest of the Plan participants. (Continued and to be signed on Reverse Side) Proxy - Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available at www.teldta.com/proxyvote. IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

 

 

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X 01BFUA 4 0 A V + Annual Meeting Proxy Card - Special Common Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below C NOTE: Please sign your name(s) EXACTLY as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. All joint holders must sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or corporate officer, please provide your FULL title. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. + A Proposal — The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR its nominees listed below. 01 - C. A. Davis 04 - H. S. Wander 02 - C. D. O’Leary 03 - G. L. Sugarman 1. Election of Directors: For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold B Change of Address — Please print new address below. 2. In accordance with their discretion, to vote upon all other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof, including matters incidental to the conduct of the meeting. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 1 1 3 9 7 7 3 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND C 1234567890 J N T C123456789 1234 5678 9012 345 000004 MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 ENDORSEMENT_LINE SACKPACK IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Electronic Voting Instructions You can vote by Internet! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose the voting method outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 19, 2011. Vote by Internet • Log on to the Internet and go to www.investorvote.com • Follow the steps outlined on the secured website.

 

Proxy for Special Common Shares Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. To Be Held May 19, 2011 The undersigned hereby appoints Walter C.D. Carlson and LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., or either of them acting in the absence of the other, with power of substitution, attorneys and proxies for and in the name and place of the undersigned, to vote the number of Special Common Shares that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then personally present at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., to be held on Thursday, May 19, 2011, or at any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof, as set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement. The undersigned hereby revokes any and all other proxies heretofore given by the undersigned to vote at such 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” its nominees in Proposal 1. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed on the reverse side hereof. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” the nominees in Proposal 1. If a nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the persons named in this proxy shall have discretionary authority to vote for a substitute nominee if one is designated by the Board of Directors (unless authority to vote for nominees has been withheld). Whether or not you are able to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, it is important that your shares be represented. Accordingly, please complete and sign the proxy card, and mail the card in the enclosed postage paid envelope addressed to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., c/o Computershare Trust Company, N.A. If “401K” is indicated next to the share amount on the reverse side, this is a ballot for voting the shares of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. stock allocated to your TDS Tax-Deferred Savings Plan (“401(k) Plan”) account. Indicate your voting instructions for the proposal on the ballot, sign and date it, and return it in the envelope provided. Your ballot must be received on or before May 17, 2011 in order to be counted. Your voting instructions will be kept confidential. If you properly sign and return your ballot, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, as Trustee of the 401(k) Plan, will vote your shares according to your instructions. If this voting instruction card is not properly completed and signed, or if it is not timely received by the designated tabulator, shares allocated to your account for the TDS 401(k) Plan will be voted as directed by the Investment Management Committee for the TDS 401(k) Plan, which shall act in the best interest of the Plan participants. (Continued and to be signed on Reverse Side) Proxy - Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available at www.teldta.com/proxyvote. IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

 

 

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X 01BFWB 1 U PX + Annual Meeting Proxy Card - Series A Common Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below B Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. + A Proposals — The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR its nominees in Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2 and 3, EVERY YEAR (1 Yr) in Proposal 4 and AGAINST Proposal 5. 01 - L. T. Carlson, Jr. 04 - W. C. D. Carlson 07 - G. W. Off 02 - L. G. Carlson 05 - K.R. Meyers 08 - M. H. Saranow 03 - P. E. Carlson 06 - D. C. Nebergall 1. Election of Directors: For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold 6. In accordance with their discretion, to vote upon all other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof, including matters incidental to the conduct of the meeting. IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION For Against Abstain 2. Ratify Accountants for 2011. For Against Abstain 3. Advisory vote on executive compensation. For Against Abstain 5. Shareholder proposal to recapitalize TDS’ outstanding stock. 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs Abstain 4. Advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation. 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 1 1 3 9 7 7 5 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND C 1234567890 J N T C123456789 1234 5678 9012 345 000004 MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 ENDORSEMENT_LINE SACKPACK IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Electronic Voting Instructions You can vote by Internet! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose the voting method outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 19, 2011. Vote by Internet • Log on to the Internet and go to www.investorvote.com • Follow the steps outlined on the secured website.

 

Proxy for Series A Common Shares Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. To Be Held May 19, 2011 The undersigned hereby appoints Walter C.D. Carlson and LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., or either of them acting in the absence of the other, with power of substitution, attorneys and proxies for and in the name and place of the undersigned, to vote the number of Series A Common Shares that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then personally present at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., to be held on Thursday, May 19, 2011, or at any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof, as set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement. The undersigned hereby revokes any and all other proxies heretofore given by the undersigned to vote at such 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” its nominees in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3, “EVERY YEAR” in Proposal 4 and “AGAINST” Proposal 5. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed on the reverse side hereof. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” the nominees in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3 and “EVERY YEAR” in Proposal 4 (which have been proposed by the Board of Directors) and “AGAINST” Proposal 5 (which has been proposed by a shareholder). If a nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the persons named in this proxy shall have discretionary authority to vote for a substitute nominee if one is designated by the Board of Directors (unless authority to vote for nominees has been withheld). Whether or not you are able to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, it is important that your shares be represented. Accordingly, please complete and sign the proxy card, and mail the card in the enclosed postage paid envelope addressed to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., c/o Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (Continued and to be signed on Reverse Side) Proxy - Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available at www.teldta.com/proxyvote. C Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print new address below. IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. + + IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

 

 

Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. X 01BFYB 1 U PX + Annual Meeting Proxy Card - Preferred Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below B Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. + A Proposals — The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR its nominees in Proposal 1, FOR Proposals 2 and 3, EVERY YEAR (1 Yr) in Proposal 4 and AGAINST Proposal 5. 1. Election of Directors: 01 - L. T. Carlson, Jr. 04 - W. C. D. Carlson 07 - G. W. Off 02 - L. G. Carlson 05 - K.R. Meyers 08 - M. H. Saranow 03 - P. E. Carlson 06 - D. C. Nebergall For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION 6. In accordance with their discretion, to vote upon all other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof, including matters incidental to the conduct of the meeting. For Against Abstain 2. Ratify Accountants for 2011. For Against Abstain 3. Advisory vote on executive compensation. For Against Abstain 5. Shareholder proposal to recapitalize TDS’ outstanding stock. 1 Yr 2 Yrs 3 Yrs Abstain 4. Advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on executive compensation. 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext NNNNNNN 1 1 3 9 7 7 7 MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND C 1234567890 J N T C123456789 1234 5678 9012 345 000004 MR A SAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 ENDORSEMENT_LINE SACKPACK IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Electronic Voting Instructions You can vote by Internet! Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose the voting method outlined below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Proxies submitted by the Internet must be received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 19, 2011. Vote by Internet • Log on to the Internet and go to www.investorvote.com • Follow the steps outlined on the secured website.

 

Proxy for Preferred Shares Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. To Be Held May 19, 2011 The undersigned hereby appoints Walter C.D. Carlson and LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., or either of them acting in the absence of the other, with power of substitution, attorneys and proxies for and in the name and place of the undersigned, to vote the number of Preferred Shares that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if then personally present at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., to be held on Thursday, May 19, 2011, or at any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof, as set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement. The undersigned hereby revokes any and all other proxies heretofore given by the undersigned to vote at such 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournment, postponement, continuation or rescheduling thereof. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” its nominees in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3, “EVERY YEAR” in Proposal 4 and “AGAINST” Proposal 5. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed on the reverse side hereof. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted “FOR” the nominees in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3 and “EVERY YEAR” in Proposal 4 (which have been proposed by the Board of Directors) and “AGAINST” Proposal 5 (which has been proposed by a shareholder). If a nominee is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the persons named in this proxy shall have discretionary authority to vote for a substitute nominee designated by the Board of Directors (unless authority to vote for nominees has been withheld). Whether or not you are able to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, it is important that your shares be represented. Accordingly, please complete and sign the proxy card, and mail the card in the enclosed postage paid envelope addressed to Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., c/o Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (Continued and to be signed on Reverse Side) Proxy - Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available at www.teldta.com/proxyvote. C Non-Voting Items Change of Address — Please print new address below. IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOU MUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD. + + IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

 

 



QuickLinks

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT AND IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 2011
SUMMARY
VOTING INFORMATION
PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
PROPOSAL 2 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
FEES PAID TO PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
PROPOSAL 3 ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
PROPOSAL 4 ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF SAY-ON-PAY VOTES
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion And Analysis
Compensation Committee Report
Risks from Compensation Policies and Practices
Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
Director Compensation
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
PROPOSAL 5 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL THAT IS OPPOSED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
"5—Equal Shareholder Voting
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2012 ANNUAL MEETING
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
OTHER BUSINESS