Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4)
File No. 333-122260
$1,000,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. is organized as a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and develops real estate properties, consisting primarily of high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties that are net leased to creditworthy corporate customers. Dividend Capital Trust was formed as a Maryland corporation in April 2002. Dividend Capital Trust is organized and conducts its operations in a manner so as to qualify as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for federal income tax purposes.
We are offering up to $1,000,000,000 in shares of our common stock. We are offering up to 72,770,273 shares to the public at $10.50 per share and Dividend Capital Securities LLC, which is an affiliate of Dividend Capital Trust, is acting as an underwriter and dealer manager of this offering on a best efforts basis. We are also offering up to 23,650,339 shares to participants in our distribution reinvestment plan at $9.975 per share. Subject to certain exceptions described in this prospectus, investors that want to participate in this offering must invest a minimum of $2,000.
Dividend Capital Advisors LLC, our advisor, which is an affiliate of Dividend Capital Trust, is responsible for managing our day-to-day activities under the terms and conditions of an advisory agreement. Our advisor is beneficially owned and/or controlled by three of our directors. See the "Conflicts of Interest" section of this prospectus for a discussion of the relationship between Dividend Capital Trust, our advisor and other of our affiliates.
See "Risk Factors" beginning on page 22 for a discussion of certain factors that you should consider before you invest in our common stock. In particular, you should carefully consider the following risks:
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities regulator has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. In addition, the Attorney General of the State of New York has not passed on or endorsed the merits of this offering. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense. The use of forecasts in this offering is prohibited. Any representation to the contrary and any predictions, written or oral, as to the amount or certainty of any present or future cash benefits or tax consequences which may flow from your investment is not permitted.
|
Price to Public |
Selling Commissions |
Proceeds to the Company(2)(3) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary Offering Per Share | $10.50 | $0.63(1) | $9.87 | ||||
Total Maximum | $764,087,870 | $45,845,272(1) | $718,242,598 | ||||
Distribution Reinvestment Plan Per Share | $9.975 | $ | $9.975 | ||||
Total Maximum | $235,912,130 | $ | $235,912,130 | ||||
DIVIDEND CAPITAL SECURITIES LLC
(Dividend Capital Securities LLC will be underwriting any offering on a best efforts basis)
The date of this prospectus is June 27, 2005
i
ii
iii
We make statements in this prospectus that are considered "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are usually identified by the use of words such as "will," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "projects," "plans," "intends," "should" or similar expressions. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995 and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe harbor provisions. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about our plans, strategies and prospects, which are based on the information currently available to us and on assumptions we have made. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations as reflected in or suggested by those forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that the plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. We have discussed in this prospectus some important risks, uncertainties and contingencies which could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the forward-looking statements we make in these documents.
We assume no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In evaluating forward-looking statements, you should consider these risks and uncertainties, together with the other risks described from time to time in our reports and documents filed with the SEC, and you should not place undue reliance on those statements.
1
The shares we are offering are suitable only as a long-term investment for persons of adequate financial means. Initially, we do not expect to have a public market for the common stock, which means that it may be difficult for you to sell your shares. You should not buy these shares if you need to sell them immediately or will need to sell them quickly in the future.
Dividend Capital Advisors LLC (the "Advisor" or our advisor) and those selling shares on our behalf shall make every reasonable effort to determine that the purchase of common stock is a suitable and appropriate investment for each investor based on information obtained by those selling shares on our behalf concerning the investor's financial situation and investment objectives. In consideration of these factors, we have established suitability standards for initial shareholders and subsequent transferees. Those selling shares on our behalf will determine that each purchaser of common stock satisfy these standards. These suitability standards require that a purchaser of common stock have either:
The minimum purchase is $2,000 except in certain states as described below. In order to satisfy the minimum purchase requirements for retirement plans, unless otherwise prohibited by state law, a husband and wife may jointly contribute funds from their separate IRAs, provided that each such contribution is made in increments of $100. You should note that an investment in common stock of Dividend Capital Trust will not, in itself, create a retirement plan and that, in order to create a retirement plan, you must comply with all applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").
The minimum purchase for Maine, Minnesota, New York and North Carolina residents is $2,500, except for IRAs and other qualified retirement plans which must purchase a minimum of $2,000.
Purchases of common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan may be in amounts less than set forth above.
Several states have established suitability standards different from those we have outlined. Shares will be sold only to investors in these states who meet the special suitability standards set forth below.
Arizona, California, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon and TennesseeInvestors must have either (1) a net worth of at least $225,000 or (2) gross annual income of $60,000 and a net worth of at least $60,000.
MaineInvestors must have either (1) a net worth of at least $200,000 or (2) gross annual income of $50,000 and a net worth of at least $50,000.
Kansas, Michigan, Ohio and PennsylvaniaIn addition to our suitability requirements, investors must have a net worth of at least ten times their investment in Dividend Capital Trust.
In the case of sales to fiduciary accounts, these suitability standards must be met by the fiduciary account, by the person who directly or indirectly supplied the funds for the purchase of the common stock or by the beneficiary of the account. These suitability standards are intended to help ensure that, given the long-term nature of an investment in our common stock, our investment objectives and the relative illiquidity of our common stock, shares of Dividend Capital Trust are an appropriate investment for each shareholder. Each participating broker-dealer must make every reasonable effort to determine that the purchase of shares is a suitable and appropriate investment for each shareholder based on information provided by the shareholder in the Subscription Agreement. Each participating broker-dealer is required to maintain for six years records of the information used to determine that an investment in the shares is suitable and appropriate for a shareholder.
2
This prospectus summary summarizes information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the "Risk Factors" section.
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. is organized as a real estate investment trust that owns, operates and develops real estate properties, consisting primarily of high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties that are net leased to creditworthy corporate customers. Dividend Capital Trust was formed as a Maryland corporation on April 12, 2002. We are structured as an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust ("UPREIT") under which substantially all of our current and future business is and will be conducted through our controlling interest in Dividend Capital Operating Partnership, LP (the "Partnership" or our operating partnership). Our office is located at 518 17th Street, Suite 1700, Denver, Colorado 80202 and our telephone number is (303) 228-2200.
The Advisor is responsible for managing our affairs on a day-to-day basis and for identifying and making investments on our behalf. Our board of directors, or our investment committee comprised of board members, must approve each property acquisition or development proposed by the Advisor, as well as certain other matters set forth in our articles of incorporation. We have seven members on our board of directors. Four of our directors are independent of the Advisor and have responsibility for reviewing the performance of the Advisor. Our directors are elected annually by the shareholders.
Sale of Common Stock
Since February 10, 2003, the date of our initial issuance of common stock, through March 31, 2005 we have raised approximately $820 million in aggregate gross offering proceeds from the sale of our common stock, including the sale of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, of which approximately $143 million has been raised subsequent to December 31, 2004.
Our Operating Partnership's Private Placement
Since November 26, 2003 through March 31, 2005, we have raised approximately $50.6 million in gross proceeds from our operating partnership's private placement of tenancy-in-common interests in industrial properties, of which approximately $18.0 million has been raised subsequent to December 31, 2004. Additionally, on April 8, 2005, our operating partnership issued approximately $4.45 million of limited partnership units in our operating partnership in conjunction with the exercise of a purchase option for an industrial property in which our operating partnership had sold tenancy-in-common interests. The unamortized portion of up-front fees and expense reimbursements paid to affiliates in conjunction with the initial sale of tenancy-in-common interests in this property were recorded against shareholders' equity as a selling cost of the limited partnership units issued. Our operating partnership's private placement is discussed in greater detail in the "Investment Objectives and CriteriaOur Operating Partnership's Private Placement" section of this prospectus.
Investment in Real Estate
Consistent with our investment strategy to invest in high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties, since March 31, 2005 through May 23, 2005, we have completed a number of property acquisitions with a total estimated investment of approximately $119 million. As of May 23, 2005, the total estimated investment in our properties was approximately $970 million comprised of 124 industrial buildings located in 19 of our 25 target markets. (See the "Recent
3
Developments," "Investment Objectives and Criteria" and "Real Estate Investments" sections of this prospectus).
We operate in a manner to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2003. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that we distribute to our shareholders. Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), REITs are subject to numerous organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that they distribute at least 90% of their taxable income. If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any year, our income will be taxed at regular corporate rates, we will not be allowed a deduction for distributions to our shareholders in computing our taxable income and we may be precluded from qualifying for treatment as a REIT for the four-year period following the year of our failure to qualify. Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may still be subject to state and local taxes on our income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.
Following are the most significant risks relating to your investment:
4
Before you invest in Dividend Capital Trust, you should read the "Risk Factors" section of this prospectus.
We invest in commercial real estate properties consisting primarily of high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties that are net leased to creditworthy corporate customers. These facilities will generally be located in the top 25 distribution and logistics markets in the United States. Such properties may include properties which are under development or construction, newly constructed or have been constructed and have operating histories. In addition, we may acquire properties with some level of vacancy at the time of closing. Please see the "Real Estate Investments" section of this prospectus for a more complete description of the properties we have acquired.
Estimated Use of Proceeds of Offering
Our management team intends to invest approximately 91.2% of the gross offering proceeds, assuming we sell 72,770,273 shares to the public and 23,650,339 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, to acquire properties as described above. The remainder of the gross offering proceeds will be used to pay fees and expenses of this offering, which shall include sales commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution reinvestment plan servicing fees, the reimbursement of offering expenses and acquisition fees. In the aggregate, these fees total an amount of up to approximately 8.8% of gross offering proceeds, assuming we sell 72,770,273 shares to the public and 23,650,339 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan.
Our investment objectives are:
5
stock by February 2013, our articles of incorporation require us to begin selling our properties and other assets and distribute the net proceeds to our shareholders.
We may only change these investment objectives upon a majority vote of our shareholders. See the "Investment Objectives and Criteria" section of this prospectus for a more complete description of our business and objectives.
The Advisor will experience conflicts of interest in connection with the management of our business affairs, including but not limited to the following:
The following chart shows the ownership structure of the various Dividend Capital entities that are affiliated with the Advisor. Dividend Capital Securities Group LLLP, Dividend Capital Management Group LLC, Dividend Capital Advisors Group LLC and Dividend Capital Exchange Facilitators LLC are presently each majority owned by one or more of the following: John Blumberg, Thomas Florence, James Mulvihill, Mark Quam, Thomas Wattles, Evan Zucker and/or their affiliates. Dividend Capital Advisors Group LLC has issued and may further issue, and Dividend Capital Management Group LLC has not issued as of the date of this prospectus but may in the future issue, equity interests or derivatives thereof to certain of their employees or other unaffiliated individuals, consultants or other parties. However, none of such transactions are expected to result in a change in control of these entities.
6
The Advisor initially invested $200,000 in the Partnership in exchange for a regular limited partner interest. Dividend Capital Trust, which serves as the general partner of the Partnership, contributed $2,000 in exchange for 200 general partnership units of the Partnership. Dividend Capital Advisors Group LLC, the parent of the Advisor, has invested $1,000 in the Partnership and has been issued limited partnership units of the Partnership which constitute the Special Units (as defined below). Currently, except as described above, the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and the Property Manager do not have any ownership interests in Dividend Capital Trust or the Partnership.
In January 2005, in connection with our third public offering, members of our board of directors, managers of our advisor, our advisor's senior management team and/or each of their respective affiliates collectively purchased in excess of $1.0 million of our common stock.
Certain managers of the Advisor, directly or indirectly through affiliated entities, have sponsored two public REITs, (i) American Real Estate Investment Corp. (known as Keystone Property Trust, NYSE:KTR) which raised approximately $93,230,000 of equity capital (including $10,750,000 in its initial public offering and $82,480,000 in connection with the acquisition of real estate) from more than
7
130 investors and was acquired by ProLogis (NYSE:PLD) in August 2004, and (ii) Dividend Capital Trust Inc., which as of March 31, 2005, had raised approximately $820,000,000 from more than 20,900 investors. In addition, as of March 31, 2005, certain of these managers have sponsored 49 private real estate programs which had raised approximately $510,000,000 of equity capital from over 600 investors. Collectively, as of March 31, 2005, the public and private programs sponsored by certain managers of the Advisor, as described above, purchased interests in 215 real estate projects having combined acquisition and development costs of approximately $1.7 billion. In addition, the Chief Investment Officer of the Advisor, in his capacity as either or both Co-Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of ProLogis, participated in overseeing the growth in its asset base from its inception in 1992 to approximately $2.5 billion in March 1997.
We are offering up to $1,000,000,000 in shares of our common stock. We are offering up to 72,770,273 shares to the public at $10.50 per share, and we are also offering up to 23,650,339 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan through which participants will be able to acquire shares at a discounted price equal to 95% of the current offering price of our common stock, or $9.975 per share. We reserve the right to reallocate the shares of common stock we are offering between our primary offering and our distribution reinvestment plan.
In addition, after the commencement of this offering, our board of directors may from time to time change the offering price of our common stock, and therefore the amount of shares being offered in this offering, through one or more supplements or amendments to this prospectus or post-effective amendments to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
This offering will continue until June 9, 2007 (two years after the SEC's effective date of this offering) or until all shares under this offering are sold, whichever is sooner. However, our board of directors may also terminate this offering at any time prior to such termination dates. The offering proceeds will be available for the acquisition of properties or the payment of fees and expenses as soon as we accept your Subscription Agreement. We generally intend to continue to admit shareholders to Dividend Capital Trust on a daily basis.
8
The Advisor and its affiliates will receive compensation and fees for services relating to any offering and the investment and management of our assets. In addition, Dividend Capital Advisors Group LLC, the parent of the Advisor, has been issued partnership units in the Partnership constituting a separate series of limited partnership interests with special distribution rights (the "Special Units"). The most significant items of compensation and the terms of the Special Units are as follows:
Organizational and Offering Stage | ||||
|
Sales Commissions: |
Up to 6.0% of gross offering proceeds (all or substantially all of which we expect will be re-allowed to participating broker-dealers). |
||
|
Dealer Manager Fee: |
Up to 2.0% of gross offering proceeds (up to 1% of which the Dealer Manager may re-allow to participating broker-dealers as a marketing expense reimbursement based on such factors as the volume of shares sold by such participating broker-dealers, marketing support and bona fide conference fees incurred). |
||
|
Distribution Reinvestment Plan Servicing Fee: |
Up to 1% of the undiscounted selling price of shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (all or substantially all of which we expect will be re-allowed to participating broker-dealers). |
||
|
Organizational and Offering Expense Reimbursement: |
Up to 2.0% of aggregate gross offering proceeds. Of the approximately $15.3 million maximum organizational and offering expense reimbursement (assuming we sell 72,770,273 shares to the public), approximately $12.7 million of the expenses are anticipated to be used for wholesaling activities and are therefore deemed to be additional underwriting compensation within the meaning established by the National Association of Securities Dealers. To the extent that the remaining approximately $2.6 million of organizational and offering expenses are insufficient to cover our cost of administering this offering, such shortfall would serve to reduce the organizational and offering expenses available to provide underwriting compensation. |
||
Acquisition and Development Stage |
||||
|
Acquisition and Advisory Fees: |
Up to 1% of the aggregate purchase price of all properties we acquire. |
||
Operational Stage |
||||
|
Asset Management Fees: |
Up to 0.75% annually of the cost of properties acquired (before non-cash reserves and depreciation). |
||
|
Property Management Fees: |
Up to the lesser of 3% of the gross revenues of our properties managed by the Property Manager or 0.6% of the net asset value of our properties managed by the Property Manager. |
||
|
Initial Lease-Up Fee for Newly Constructed Property: |
Competitive fee for geographic location of property based on a survey of brokers and agents. |
||
9
|
Real Estate Commissions: |
Up to the lesser of (1) 50% of the reasonable, customary and competitive commission paid for the sale of a comparable property or (2) 3% of the contract price of each property sold. Payment of any Real Estate Commissions is deferred until partners of the Partnership have received a return of capital plus a 7% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return on their net capital contributions. |
||
|
Special Units: |
In general, the holder of the Special Units will be entitled to receive 15% of specified distributions made after other partners of the Partnership have received, in the aggregate, cumulative distributions equal to their capital contributions plus a 7% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return on their net contributions. |
||
More specifically, while the Special Units are outstanding, and after other partners of the Partnership have received, in the aggregate, cumulative distributions from all sources equal to their net capital contributions plus a 7% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return on their contributions, the holder will receive 15% of net sales proceeds received by the Partnership on dispositions of the Partnership's assets. Special Units will be redeemed upon the earlier of the listing of our common stock or a sale or merger that results in a termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement for the amount that would have been distributed with respect to the Special Units in accordance with the preceding sentence if the Partnership sold all of its assets for their then fair market values, paid all of its liabilities and distributed any remaining amounts to partners in liquidation of the Partnership. |
||||
Except as described above, the Special Units shall not be entitled to receive any redemption or similar payment from Dividend Capital Trust or the Partnership. |
There are many conditions to and restrictions on the amount of compensation the Advisor and its affiliates may receive. There are also some smaller items of expense reimbursements that the Advisor may receive. For a more detailed explanation of these fees and expenses payable to the Advisor and its affiliates, and for a more detailed discussion of the Special Units described above, please see the "ManagementManagement Compensation" section of this prospectus.
Dividend Capital Trust operates in a manner to qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2003. In order to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute 90% of our annual taxable income to our shareholders. We accrue and pay distributions on a quarterly basis and we will calculate our distributions based upon daily record and distribution declaration dates so investors will be entitled to earn distributions immediately upon purchasing common stock.
We presently intend to list our common stock on a national securities exchange or an over-the-counter market or complete a sale or merger of Dividend Capital Trust in a transaction which
10
provides our shareholders with securities of a publicly traded company. In the event we do not list our common stock, complete a sale or merger of Dividend Capital Trust in a transaction which provides our shareholders with a combination of cash and/or securities of a publicly-traded company or sell substantially all of our properties for cash or other consideration prior to February 2013, our articles of incorporation require us to begin selling our properties and other assets and to distribute the net proceeds to our shareholders.
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
You may participate in our distribution reinvestment plan pursuant to which you may have the cash distributions you receive reinvested in common stock of Dividend Capital Trust at a discount purchase price equal to the current or most recent offering price of our common stock less 5%. If you participate, you will be taxed on an amount equal to the fair market value, on the relevant distribution date, of the shares of our common stock purchased with reinvested distributions even though you will not receive the cash from those distributions. As a result, you may incur a tax liability without receiving cash to pay such liability. Our board of directors may terminate the distribution reinvestment plan in our discretion at any time upon 10 days notice to our shareholders. Following any termination of the distribution reinvestment plan, all subsequent distributions to shareholders would be made in cash. Any such termination may limit our ability to fund the share redemptions discussed below. (See "Description of SecuritiesDistribution Reinvestment Plan").
As long as our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or traded on an over-the-counter market, shareholders of Dividend Capital Trust who have held their shares for at least one year may be able to redeem all or any portion of their shares in accordance with the procedures outlined in the prospectus relating to the shares they purchased. At that time, we may, subject to the conditions and limitations described below, redeem the shares presented for redemption for cash to the extent that we have sufficient funds available to us to fund such redemption.
The amount received from the redemption of shares issued pursuant to this prospectus will be equal to a percentage of the price actually paid for the shares, which percentage is dependent upon the number of years the shares are held, as described in the following table:
Share Purchase Anniversary |
Redemption Price as a Percentage of Purchase Price* |
|
---|---|---|
0-1 | No Redemption Allowed | |
1 | 92.5% | |
2 | 95.0% | |
3 | 97.5% | |
4 | 100.0% |
We currently expect that our distribution reinvestment plan will be the primary source of funds used to redeem common stock. Our board of directors reserves the right to use other sources of funds to redeem common stock, to reject any request for redemption of common stock for any reason or no reason or to amend or terminate the share redemption program at any time. You will have no right to request the redemption of your shares after the common stock is listed on a national securities exchange or an over-the-counter market. (See "Description of SecuritiesShare Redemption Program").
11
Dividend Capital Operating Partnership
We intend to own all of our real estate properties through Dividend Capital Operating Partnership LP or its subsidiaries. We are the sole general partner of the Partnership. Along with the Advisor and the parent of the Advisor, we are currently the only limited partners of the Partnership. Our ownership of properties in the Partnership allows us to acquire real estate properties in exchange for limited partnership units in the Partnership. This structure will also allow sellers of properties to transfer their properties to the Partnership in exchange for limited partnership units of the Partnership and defer recognition of taxable gain that would have been recognized if the properties had instead been sold to us. The holders of limited partnership units in the Partnership may have their units redeemed under certain circumstances. (See "The Partnership Agreement").
The section of this prospectus entitled "ERISA Considerations" describes the effect the purchase of common stock will have on individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and retirement plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), and/or the Code. ERISA is a federal law that regulates the operation of certain tax-advantaged retirement plans. Any retirement plan trustee or individual considering purchasing common stock for a retirement plan or an IRA should read this section of the prospectus very carefully.
General
Your investment will be recorded on our books only. We will not issue stock certificates. If you wish to transfer your shares, you will be required to send an executed transfer form to us. We will provide the required form to you upon request.
Shareholder Voting Rights and Limitations
We will hold annual meetings of our shareholders for the purpose of electing our directors and conducting other business matters that may be presented at such meetings. We may also call a special meeting of shareholders from time to time for the purpose of conducting certain matters. You are entitled to one vote for each share you own at any of these meetings.
Restriction on Share Ownership
Our articles of incorporation contain a restriction on ownership of the common stock that prevents any person or entity from owning directly or indirectly more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock. (See "Description of SecuritiesRestriction on Ownership of Common Stock"). These restrictions, as well as other share ownership and transfer restrictions contained in our articles of incorporation, are designed to enable us to comply with share accumulation and other restrictions imposed on REITs by the Code. For a more complete description of the common stock, including restrictions on the ownership of common stock, please see the "Description of Securities" section of this prospectus.
12
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THIS OFFERING
Set forth below are some of the more frequently asked questions and answers relating to an offering of this type. Please see the "Prospectus Summary", the remainder of this prospectus for more detailed information about this offering.
13
14
15
partners have received, in the aggregate, cumulative distributions equal to their capital contributions plus a 7% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return on their net contributions.
The Advisor's management team plans to accomplish these objectives by acquiring primarily high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties that are net leased to creditworthy corporate customers. These facilities will generally be located in the top 25 distribution and logistics markets in the United States. Such properties may include properties which are under development or construction, newly constructed or have been constructed and have operating histories. The Advisor's management team will on a limited basis also develop properties directly or in joint ventures with third party developers. In general, national, regional and local companies utilize the space in these building types to store and ship product to their customers. In some cases, the buildings can be used for light manufacturing or assembly. The Advisor intends to generally focus on properties that have been leased or pre-leased on a net basis to one or more creditworthy corporate customers, although some of the properties we purchase may have some vacancy to be filled after closing.
Although our management team also believes that there may be certain advantages to investing in industrial properties, by focusing on industrial properties we will not have the advantage of a portfolio of properties that is diversified across different property types. As a result, we will be exposed to risks or trends that have a greater impact on the market for industrial properties. These risks or trends may include the movement of manufacturing facilities to foreign markets which have lower labor or production costs, transportation or distribution trends which may change user demand for distribution space on a national or regional basis, including our target markets and other economic trends or events which would cause industrial properties to under-perform other property types.
16
that include acquisition rights on current or future properties to be built or leased or both. Depending upon the circumstance, the joint ventures may have a debt and/or an equity component.
17
18
this offering, which shall include sales commissions, dealer manager fees, distribution reinvestment plan servicing fees, reimbursement of offering expenses and acquisition fees in an aggregate amount of up to approximately 8.8% of gross offering proceeds, assuming we sell 72,770,273 shares to the public and 23,650,339 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan.
In January 2005, in connection with our third public offering, members of our board of directors, managers of our advisor, our advisor's senior management team and/or each of their respective affiliates collectively purchased in excess of $1.0 million of our common stock.
19
As discussed in the following paragraph, the absence of a public market may continue for an extended period of time after the date of this prospectus. As a result, you may find it difficult to find a buyer for your shares and realize a return on your investment. Subject to certain resale restrictions, you may sell your shares to any buyer unless such sale would cause any person or entity to directly or indirectly own more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock or would violate the other restrictions imposed by our articles of incorporation on ownership and transfers of our common stock. (See "Description of SecuritiesRestriction on Ownership of Common Stock").
In addition, after you have held your shares for at least one year, you may be able to redeem all or a portion of your shares pursuant to our share redemption program as outlined in the prospectus (See "Description of SecuritiesShare Redemption Program"). If we have not listed the common stock on a national securities exchange or an over-the-counter market, completed a sale or merger of Dividend Capital Trust in a transaction which provides our shareholders with a combination of cash and/or securities of a publicly traded company or sold substantially all of our properties for cash or other consideration by February 2013, our articles of incorporation require us to begin selling our properties and other assets and to distribute the net proceeds to our shareholders.
20
Charles
Murray, President
Dividend Capital Securities LLC
518 17th Street, 12th Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 228-2200
Fax: (303) 228-2201
21
Your purchase of common stock involves a number of risks. In addition to other risks discussed in this prospectus, you should specifically consider the following:
We have a limited operating history.
Dividend Capital Trust was formed as a Maryland corporation on April 12, 2002 in order to own, operate and develop industrial real estate properties. We have a limited history of operations and a limited portfolio of properties which you are able to evaluate in making a decision to purchase our common stock.
There is no current public trading market for your shares.
There is no current public market for the common stock and we have no obligation or immediate plans to apply for quotation or listing in any public securities market. Although in the future we will consider opportunities to establish a public market for our common stock, there can be no assurance that a public market will ever exist. It will therefore be very difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all. Even if you are able to sell your shares, the absence of a public market may cause the price received for any common stock sold to be less than the proportionate value of the real estate we own or less than the price you paid. Therefore, you should purchase the common stock only as a long-term investment. (See the "Description of SecuritiesShare Redemption Program" section of this prospectus).
We currently do not have research analysts reviewing the performance of our company.
We do not have research analysts reviewing the performance of our company or our securities on an ongoing basis. Therefore, we do not have an independent review of our performance and value of our common stock relative to publicly traded companies.
We currently utilize the Advisor for selection of properties and we rely on our board of directors for ultimate approval of the investment of offering proceeds.
Our ability to pay distributions and achieve our other investment objectives is partially dependent upon the performance of the Advisor in the acquisition of real estate properties, the operation of such properties and the determination of any financing arrangements. Our board of directors, which must approve all property acquisitions, will have broad discretion to monitor the performance of the Advisor as well as to determine the manner in which the net offering proceeds are invested. Our board of directors may delegate to our investment committee, which is comprised of three directors, two of whom are independent directors, the authority to approve individual property acquisitions or developments of up to $25 million. All acquisitions or developments in excess of $25 million must be approved by our board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors. As a result, you must rely on the Advisor to identify properties and propose transactions and on the board of directors to oversee and approve such transactions. (See "Management").
Distributions payable by REITs do not qualify for the reduced tax rates that apply to other corporate distributions.
Tax legislation enacted in 2003 generally reduces the maximum tax rate for distributions payable by corporations to individuals to 15% through 2008. Distributions payable by REITs, however, generally continue to be taxed at the normal rate applicable to the individual recipient, rather than the 15% preferential rate. Although this legislation does not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or
22
distributions paid by REITs, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate distributions could cause investors who are individuals to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay distributions, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common stock. (See "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsTaxation of Taxable U.S. ShareholdersDistributions Generally").
We depend on key personnel.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of certain key personnel, including but not limited to James R. Mulvihill, Thomas G. Wattles, Evan H. Zucker, Thomas I. Florence, John A. Blumberg, James D. Cochran, Daryl H. Mechem and Matthew T. Murphy, each of whom would be difficult to replace. We do not have employment agreements with any of our key personnel, and we currently do not have key man life insurance on any person. If any of our key personnel were to cease employment with us, our operating results could suffer. We also believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon our ability to hire and retain highly skilled managerial, operational and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such skilled personnel. (See "Management").
The Advisor will face conflicts of interest relating to time management.
The Advisor is currently pursuing other business opportunities with third parties. Managers of the Advisor are currently engaged in other real estate activities, including acquisition and development of commercial and residential real estate in the United States and Mexico. We are not able to estimate the amount of time that the managers of the Advisor will devote to our business. As a result, the managers of the Advisor may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities. During times of intense activity in other programs and ventures, the time they devote to our business may decline and be less than we would require. We expect that as our real estate activities expand, the Advisor may attempt to hire additional employees who would devote substantially all of their time to the business of Dividend Capital Trust and its affiliates. However, there can be no assurance that the Advisor will devote adequate time to our business activities. (See "Conflicts of Interest").
The Advisor may face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase and leasing of properties.
We may buy properties at the same time as other entities that are affiliated with the Advisor are buying properties. There is a risk that the Advisor will choose a property that provides lower returns to us than a property purchased by another entity affiliated with the Advisor. We may acquire properties in geographic areas where other affiliates of the Advisor own properties. If one of the entities affiliated with the Advisor attracts a customer that we are competing for, we could suffer a loss of revenue due to delays in locating another suitable customer. (See "Conflicts of InterestCompetition").
The Advisor will face conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures with affiliates.
We may enter into joint ventures with third parties, including entities that are affiliated with the Advisor, for the acquisition, development and improvement of properties. We may also purchase and develop properties directly or in joint ventures or partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with the sellers of the properties, affiliates of the sellers, developers or other persons. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with a direct investment in real estate, including, for example:
23
Actions by such a venture partner or co-tenant might have the result of subjecting the property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and may have the effect of reducing your returns.
Under certain joint venture arrangements, neither venture partner may have the power to control the venture, and an impasse could be reached, which might have a negative influence on the joint venture and decrease potential returns to you. In the event that a venture partner has a right of first refusal to buy out the other partner, it may be unable to finance such buy-out at that time. It may also be difficult for us to sell our interest in any such joint venture or partnership or as a co-tenant in property. In addition, to the extent that our venture partner or co-tenant is an affiliate of the Advisor, certain conflicts of interest will exist. (See "Conflicts of InterestJoint Ventures with Affiliates of the Advisor").
The Dealer Manager was recently formed and has not participated in similar offerings.
The Dealer Manager was formed in December 2001 and it has not participated in any securities offering other than our prior public offerings. The Dealer Manager has entered into agreements with broker-dealers pursuant to which those firms will sell our common stock in this offering. Should the Dealer Manager be unable to maintain agreements with a significant group of broker-dealers, then we may be unable to sell a significant number of shares. If we do not sell a significant number of shares then we will likely acquire a limited number of properties and will not achieve significant diversification of our property holdings. Because the Dealer Manager has limited experience in prior offerings, it may be difficult to evaluate its ability to manage this offering.
A limit on the number of shares a person may own may discourage a takeover or business combination.
Our articles of incorporation restrict direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock. This restriction may discourage a change of control of Dividend Capital Trust and may deter individuals or entities from making tender offers for common stock on terms that might be financially attractive to shareholders or which may cause a change in our management. This ownership restriction may also prohibit business combinations that would have otherwise been approved by our board of directors and shareholders. (See "Description of SecuritiesRestriction on Ownership of Common Stock").
You are limited in your ability to sell your shares pursuant to our share redemption program.
Our share redemption program may provide you with a limited opportunity to redeem your shares after you have held them for a period of one year. However, our board of directors reserves the right to suspend or terminate the share redemption program at any time. In addition, our share redemption program contains certain restrictions and limitations. Common stock may be redeemed quarterly on a pro rata basis. Subject to funds being available, the number of shares redeemed during any calendar year will be limited to the lesser of (1) three percent (3%) of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year, and (2) the number of shares we can redeem with the proceeds we receive from the sale of common stock under our distribution reinvestment plan. Therefore, in making a decision to purchase our common stock, you should not assume that you will be able to sell any of your shares back to us pursuant to our share redemption program. (See "Description of SecuritiesShare Redemption Program").
24
We did not establish the offering price of our common stock based on an appraised value of our properties.
We have not obtained an appraisal of our properties in connection with this offering. Our board of directors determined the selling price of the common stock; however, such price may bear no relationship to property appraisals or to any established criteria for valuing our issued or outstanding common stock. Our board of directors determined the price of our shares pursuant to this offering considering a number of factors including, but not limited to: our historic, current and anticipated dividend yields; yields provided by similar and other real estate investments; our current and anticipated operating results; the quality, size, diversity and location of properties in our portfolio; the quality and diversity of our tenant base; our existing and anticipated debt structure; and our progress in executing our investment and operating strategy.
If we have not listed our stock for public trading or created an alternative liquidity event for our shareholders by February 2013, then we will take steps to liquidate our assets.
If we have not listed our common stock on a national securities exchange or an over-the-counter market, completed a sale or merger of Dividend Capital Trust in a transaction which provides our shareholders with a combination of cash and/or securities of a publicly traded company or sold substantially all of our properties for cash or other consideration by February 2013, our articles of incorporation require us to begin selling our properties and other assets and to distribute the net proceeds to our shareholders. Various economic and political conditions existing at the time we liquidate our assets may adversely affect our ability to sell assets at favorable prices. As a result, there can be no assurance that we would be able to sell our assets at prices which are consistent with our estimate of the fair market value of our properties or that would provide our stockholders with any particular return. (See "Questions and Answers About this OfferingIf I buy common stock in this offering, how may I later sell it?").
Your interest in Dividend Capital Trust may be diluted if we issue additional common stock.
Our shareholders do not have preemptive rights to any common stock issued by Dividend Capital Trust in the future. Therefore, in the event that we (1) sell common stock in the future, including those issued pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan, (2) sell securities that are convertible into common stock, (3) issue common stock in a private offering to institutional investors, (4) issue shares of common stock upon the exercise of the options granted to our independent directors or employees of the Advisor and our property manager or warrants issued or that may be issued to our dealer manager or to participating broker-dealers, or (5) issue common stock to sellers of properties acquired by us in connection with an exchange of limited partnership interests in our operating partnership or one of its subsidiaries, existing shareholders and investors purchasing shares in this offering will experience dilution of their percentage ownership in Dividend Capital Trust. Depending on the terms of such transactions, most notably the offer price per share, which may be less than the price paid per share in this offering, and the value of our properties, existing shareholders might also experience a dilution in the book value per share of their investment in Dividend Capital Trust. (See "Description of Securities").
Payment of fees to the Advisor and its affiliates will reduce cash available for investment and distribution.
The Advisor and its affiliates will perform services for us in connection with the offer and sale of the common stock, the selection and acquisition of our properties, and the management and leasing of our properties. They will be paid substantial fees for these services, which will reduce the amount of cash available for investment in properties and distribution to shareholders. We estimate that approximately 8.8% of gross offering proceeds, assuming we sell 72,770,273 shares to the public and 23,650,339 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, will be paid to the Advisor, its
25
affiliates and third parties for up-front fees and expenses associated with the offer and sale of our common stock. (See "ManagementManagement Compensation").
The availability and timing of cash distributions is uncertain.
We expect to pay quarterly distributions to our shareholders. However, we bear all expenses incurred by our operations, which are deducted from cash funds generated by operations prior to computing the amount of cash distributions to be distributed to our shareholders. In addition, our board of directors, in its discretion, may retain any portion of such funds for working capital. We cannot assure you that sufficient cash will be available to pay distributions to you.
We are uncertain of our sources for funding our future capital needs.
Substantially all of the gross offering proceeds will be used for investment in properties and for payment of various fees and expenses. (See the "Estimated Use of Proceeds" section of this prospectus). In addition, we do not anticipate that we will maintain any permanent working capital reserves. Accordingly, in the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future for the improvement of our properties or for any other reason, we cannot assure you that such funding will be available to us.
If we are unable to find suitable investments, we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives or pay distributions.
Our ability to achieve our investment objectives, including the payment of distributions, depends upon the performance of the Advisor in the acquisition of our investments and the determination of any financing arrangements and upon the performance of our operating professionals and to maintain our customer base, maintain strong occupancies and negotiate favorable leasing arrangements. Except for the investments described in our previous filings, you will have no opportunity to evaluate the terms of transactions or other economic or financial data concerning our investments. You must rely entirely on the management abilities of the Advisor, the property managers the Advisor selects and the oversight by our board of directors. We cannot be sure that the Advisor will be successful in obtaining suitable investments on financially attractive terms or that, if the Advisor makes investments on our behalf, our objectives will be achieved. The more capital we raise in this offering or any future offerings, the greater will be our challenge to invest all of the net offering proceeds on attractive terms. Therefore, the large size of this offering increases the risk that we may pay too much for real estate acquisitions. If we, through the Advisor, are unable to find suitable investments promptly, we will hold the proceeds from any offering in an interest-bearing account or invest the proceeds in short-term, investment-grade investments (which are not likely to earn as high a return as we expect to earn on our real estate investments) and may, ultimately, liquidate. In such an event, our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders would be adversely affected. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaAcquisition and Investment Policies").
We may have difficulty funding our distributions with funds provided by our operations.
As a growing company, to date we have funded our quarterly distributions to investors with funds from operations and, to a lesser extent, with borrowings under our bank credit facility. Our long-term corporate strategy is to fund the payment of quarterly distributions to our shareholders entirely from funds from our operations. However, if we are unsuccessful in deploying the offering proceeds we raise on an effective and efficient basis, we may continue to fund our quarterly distributions to investors from a combination of funds from operations and financing proceeds. In the event we are unable to consistently fund future quarterly distributions to investors entirely from our funds from operations, the value of your shares upon the possible listing of our stock, the sale of our assets or any other liquidity event may be negatively impacted.
26
Our articles of incorporation permit our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of our common stockholders or discourage a third party from acquiring us in a manner that could result in a premium price to our shareholders.
Our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued common stock or preferred stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to cash distributions and other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption of any such stock. Thus, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of preferred stock with terms and conditions that could have priority as to distributions and amounts payable upon liquidation over the rights of the holders of our common stock. Such preferred stock could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might otherwise provide a premium price to holders of our common stock. (See "Description of SecuritiesPreferred Stock").
Our management has broad control over our operations and you will have limited control over changes in our policies and operations.
Our board of directors determines our major policies, including our policies regarding financing, growth, debt capitalization, REIT qualification, distributions, acquisitions of properties and acquisitions of businesses (including the business of our advisor or property manager). Our board of directors may amend or revise these and other policies without a vote of the shareholders. Under the Maryland General Corporation Law and our articles of incorporation, our shareholders have a right to vote only on limited matters. Our board's broad discretion in setting policies and our shareholders' inability to exert control over those policies increases the uncertainty and risks you face as a shareholder. (See "ManagementGeneral").
Adverse economic and geopolitical conditions could negatively affect our returns and profitability.
Among others, the following market and economic challenges may adversely affect our operating results:
Our operations could be negatively affected to the extent that an economic downturn is prolonged or becomes more severe.
Actions of our joint venture partners could negatively impact our performance.
We are likely to enter into additional joint ventures with third parties to acquire, develop or improve properties. We may also purchase and develop properties directly or in joint ventures or through partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with other methods of investment in real estate, including, but not limited to:
27
Any of the above might subject a property to liabilities in excess of those contemplated and thus reduce your returns. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaJoint Venture Investments").
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
We have incurred indebtedness and expect that we will incur additional indebtedness in the future. Interest we pay reduces our cash available for distributions. Additionally, since we have incurred variable rate debt, increases in interest rates raise our interest costs, which reduces our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to you. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments in properties at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaBorrowing Policies and Related Indebtedness").
Our hedging strategies may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with interest rates.
We use various derivative financial instruments to provide a level of protection against interest rate risks, but no hedging strategy can protect us completely. We cannot assure you that our use of derivatives will offset the risks related to changes in interest rates. In addition, the nature and timing of hedging transactions may influence the effectiveness of our hedging strategies. Poorly designed strategies or improperly executed transactions could actually increase our risk and losses. In addition, hedging strategies involve transaction and other costs. We cannot assure you that our hedging strategy and the derivatives that we use will adequately offset the risk of interest rate volatility or that our hedging transactions will not result in losses.
Your return on investment may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
We are not registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. If we were obligated to register as an investment company, we would have to comply with a variety of substantive requirements under the Investment Company Act. These requirements include:
In order to maintain our exemption from regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, we must engage primarily in the business of buying real estate, and these investments must be made within a year after the offering ends. If we are unable to invest a significant portion of the proceeds of the offering in properties within one year of the termination of the offering such that more than 40% of our assets consist of "investment securities," as defined under the Investment Company Act of 1940, we may avoid being required to register as an investment company by temporarily investing any unused proceeds in government securities with low returns. This would reduce the cash available for distribution to shareholders and possibly lower your returns.
28
To maintain compliance with the Investment Company Act exemption, we may be unable to sell assets we would otherwise want to sell and may need to sell assets we would otherwise wish to retain. In addition, we may have to acquire additional income or loss generating assets that we might not otherwise have acquired or may have to forgo opportunities to acquire interests in companies that we would otherwise want to acquire and would be important to our strategy.
If we were required to register as an investment company but failed to do so, we would be prohibited from engaging in our business, and criminal and civil actions could be brought against us. In addition, our contracts would be unenforceable unless a court were to require enforcement, and a court could appoint a receiver to take control of us and liquidate our business.
Our derivative financial instruments used to hedge against interest rate fluctuations could reduce the overall returns on your investment.
We have and may continue to use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates on loans secured by our properties. These instruments involve risk, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to perform under the terms of the derivative contract or that such arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. In addition, the possible use of such instruments may reduce the overall return on our investments. These instruments may also generate income that may not be treated as qualifying REIT income for purposes of the 75% or 95% REIT income test.
The Advisor may have conflicting fiduciary obligations if we acquire properties with its affiliates.
The Advisor may cause us to acquire an interest in a property through a joint venture with its affiliates. In these circumstances, the Advisor will have a fiduciary duty to both us and its affiliates participating in the joint venture. The resolution of this conflict of interest may cause the Advisor to sacrifice our best interest in favor of the seller of the property and therefore, we may enter into a transaction that is not in our best interest. The resolution of this conflict of interest may negatively impact our financial performance. (See "Conflicts of Interest").
The fees we pay in connection with this offering were not determined on an arm's-length basis and therefore may not be on the same terms we could achieve from a third-party.
The compensation paid to the Advisor, Dealer Manager and other affiliates for services they provide us was not determined on an arm's-length basis. All agreements, contracts or arrangements with our affiliates were not negotiated at arm's length. Such agreements include, but are not limited to, the Advisory Agreement, the Dealer Manager Agreement and the Property Management and Leasing Agreement. These agreements may contain terms that are not in our best interest and may not otherwise be applicable if we entered into arm's-length agreements. See "Conflicts of Interest" for a discussion of various conflicts of interest. (See "ManagementManagement Compensation").
We cannot predict the amounts of compensation to be paid to the Advisor and our other affiliates.
Because the fees that we will pay to the Advisor and our other affiliates are based in part on the level of our business activity, it is not possible to predict the amounts of compensation that we will be required to pay these entities. In addition, because key employees of our affiliates are given broad discretion to determine when to consummate a transaction, we rely on these key persons to dictate the level of our business activity. Furthermore, the fees paid to our affiliates will reduce funds available for distribution, and therefore we cannot predict precisely how such fees will impact our distributions. (See "ManagementManagement Compensation").
29
Our dealer manager, which is affiliated with us, has not made an independent review of us or the prospectus.
The Dealer Manager is one of our affiliates and will not make an independent review of us or this offering. Accordingly, you do not have the benefit of an independent review of the terms of this offering. Further, the due diligence investigation of us by the Dealer Manager cannot be considered to be an independent review and, therefore, may not be as meaningful as a review conducted by an unaffiliated broker-dealer or investment banker. In addition, a substantial portion of the proceeds of any offering will be paid to the Dealer Manager for managing the offering, including selling commissions, a dealer manager fee and marketing expense reimbursements.
If we invest in a limited partnership as a general partner we could be responsible for all liabilities of such partnership.
In some joint ventures or other investments we may make, if the entity in which we invest is a limited partnership, we may acquire all or a portion of our interest in such partnership as a general partner. As a general partner, we could be liable for all the liabilities of such partnership. Additionally, we may also be required to take our interests in other investments as a non-managing general partner as in the case of our initial investment. Consequently, we would be potentially liable for all such liabilities without having the same rights of management or control over the operation of the partnership as the managing general partner or partners may have. Therefore, we may be held responsible for all of the liabilities of an entity in which we do not have full management rights or control, and our liability may far exceed the amount or value of investment we initially made or then had in the partnership.
If we do not have sufficient capital resources from equity and debt financings for acquisitions of new properties or other assets because of our inability to retain earnings, our growth may be limited.
In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our taxable income. This requirement limits our ability to retain income or cash flow from operations to finance the acquisition of new properties. We will explore acquisition opportunities from time to time with the intention of expanding our operations and increasing our profitability. We anticipate that we will use debt and equity financing for such acquisitions because of our inability to retain significant earnings. Consequently, if we cannot obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to acquire new properties and expand our operations will be adversely affected.
Your investment may be subject to additional risks if we make international investments.
We may purchase properties located in Mexico and Canada. Any such investment could be affected by factors peculiar to the laws and business practices of the jurisdictions in which the properties are located. These laws may expose us to risks that are different from and in addition to those commonly found in the United States. Foreign investments could be subject to the following risks:
30
Our UPREIT structure may result in potential conflicts of interest.
Persons holding units in our operating partnership have the right to vote on certain amendments to the Limited Partnership Agreement, as well as on certain other matters. Persons holding such voting rights may exercise them in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our shareholders. As general partner of the operating partnership, we will be obligated to act in a manner that is in the best interest of all partners of the operating partnership. Circumstances may arise in the future when the interest of limited partners in the operating partnership may conflict with the interests of our shareholders. For example, the timing and terms of dispositions of properties held by the operating partnership may result in tax consequences to certain limited partners and not to our shareholders. (See "The Partnership Agreement").
General Real Estate Risks
We will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:
For these and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will be profitable or that we will realize growth in the value of our real estate properties. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaAcquisition and Investment Policies").
31
Competition for investments may increase costs and reduce returns.
We will compete for real property investments with pension funds and their advisors, bank and insurance company investment accounts, other real estate investment trusts, real estate limited partnerships, individuals and other entities engaged in real estate investment activities. Many other competitors have greater financial resources than us and a greater ability to borrow funds to acquire properties. Competition for investments may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities available to us and may have the effect of increasing acquisition costs reducing the rents we can charge and, as a result, reducing your returns. We believe the current market for acquisitions to be extremely competitive.
A property that incurs a vacancy could be difficult to sell or re-lease.
A property may incur a vacancy either by the continued default of a customer under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. In addition, certain of the properties we acquire may have some level of vacancy at the time of closing. Certain of our properties may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a customer. We may have difficulty obtaining a new customer for any vacant space we have in our properties. If the vacancy continues for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues resulting in less cash available to be distributed to shareholders. In addition, the resale value of a property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaAcquisition and Investment Policies").
We are dependent on customers for our revenue.
Certain of our properties are occupied by a single customer. As a result, the success of those properties will depend on the financial stability of a single customer. Lease payment defaults by customers could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders. A default by a customer on its lease payments could force us to find an alternative source of revenue to pay any mortgage loan on the property. In the event of a customer default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs, including litigation and related expenses, in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. If a lease is terminated, we may be unable to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaTerms of Leases and Customer Creditworthiness").
We may not have funding for future tenant improvements.
When a customer at one of our properties does not renew its lease or otherwise vacates its space in one of our buildings, it is likely that, in order to attract one or more new customers, we will be required to expend funds to construct new tenant improvements in the vacated space. Substantially all of our net offering proceeds will be invested in real estate properties and therefore, while we intend to manage our cash position or financing availability to pay for any improvements required for re-leasing, we cannot assure you that we will have adequate sources of funding available to us for such purposes in the future.
Uninsured losses relating to real property may adversely affect your returns.
The Advisor will attempt to ensure that all of our properties are adequately insured to cover casualty losses. However, changes in the cost or availability of insurance could expose us to uninsured casualty losses. In the event that any of our properties incurs a casualty loss that is not fully covered by insurance, the value of our assets will be reduced by any such uninsured loss. In addition, we may have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct the damaged property, and we cannot assure you that any
32
such sources of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. (See "Real Estate InvestmentsInsurance Coverage on Properties").
Development and construction of properties may result in delays and increased costs and risks.
We may invest some of the net offering proceeds available for investment in the acquisition of raw land upon which we will develop and construct improvements at a fixed contract price. In any such projects we will be subject to risks relating to the builder's ability to control construction costs or to build in conformity with plans, specifications and timetables. The builder's failure to perform may result in legal action by us to rescind the purchase or construction contract or to enforce the builder's obligations. Performance may also be affected or delayed by conditions beyond the builder's control. Delays in completion of construction could also give customers the right to terminate preconstruction leases for space at a newly developed project. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to such builders prior to completion of construction. Each of these factors could result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects if they are not fully leased prior to the commencement of construction. Furthermore, the price we agree to for the land will be based on projections of rental income and expenses and estimates of construction costs as well as the fair market value of the property upon completion of construction. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for the land and fail to achieve our forecast of returns due to the factors discussed above. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaDevelopment and Construction of Properties").
Delays in acquisitions of properties may have adverse effects on your investment.
Delays we encounter in the selection, acquisition and development of properties could adversely affect your returns. Where properties are acquired prior to the start of construction, it will typically take 8 to 18 months to complete construction and lease available space. Therefore, you could suffer delays in the payment of cash distributions attributable to those particular properties. Our articles of incorporation limits the amount we can invest in unimproved land to 10% of our total assets.
Uncertain market conditions and the broad discretion of the Advisor relating to the future disposition of properties could adversely affect the return on your investment.
We expect to hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as the Advisor decides that a sale or other disposition is appropriate given our investment objectives. The Advisor, subject to approval of the board, may exercise its discretion as to whether and when to sell a property, and we will have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time, except in the event of a liquidation of our properties in accordance with our articles of incorporation if we do not list our common stock, complete a sale or merger of Dividend Capital Trust in a transaction which provides our shareholders with a combination of cash and/or securities of a publicly traded company or sell substantially all of our properties for cash or other consideration by February 2013. We cannot predict the various market conditions affecting real estate investments which will exist at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions which may affect the future disposition of our properties, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell our properties at a profit in the future. Accordingly, the extent to which you will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will be dependent upon fluctuating market conditions. (See "ManagementThe Advisor").
Discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our operating results.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removing or remediating hazardous or toxic substances on
33
such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated. A property owner who violates environmental laws may be subject to sanctions which may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our properties, we may be exposed to such costs. The cost of defending against environmental claims, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements or of remediating any contaminated property could materially adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distribution to our shareholders.
If we fail to make our debt payments, we could lose our investment in a property.
Loans obtained to fund property acquisitions will generally be secured by first mortgages on such properties. If we are unable to make our debt service payments as required, a lender could foreclose on the property or properties securing its debt. This could cause us to lose part or all of our investment which in turn could cause the value of the common stock and the distributions payable to shareholders to be reduced. Certain of our existing and future indebtedness is and may be cross-collateralized and, consequently, a default on this indebtedness could cause us to lose part or all of our investment in multiple properties. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaBorrowing Policies and Related Indebtedness").
Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations.
In connection with obtaining certain financing, a lender may impose certain restrictions on us which affect our ability to incur additional debt and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. Loan documents we enter into may contain negative covenants which limit our ability to further mortgage the property, replace the Advisor or impose other limitations. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaBorrowing Policies and Related Indebtedness").
If we enter into financing arrangements involving balloon payment obligations, it may adversely affect our ability to make distributions.
Some of our financing arrangements require us to make a lump-sum or "balloon" payment at maturity. Our ability to make a balloon payment at maturity is uncertain and may depend upon our ability to obtain additional financing or our ability to sell the property. At the time the balloon payment is due, we may or may not be able to refinance the existing financing on terms as favorable as the original loan or sell the property at a price sufficient to make the balloon payment. The effect of a refinancing or sale could affect the rate of return to shareholders and the projected time of disposition of our assets. In addition, payments of principal and interest made to service our debts may leave us with insufficient cash to pay the distributions that we are required to pay to maintain our qualification as a REIT. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaBorrowing Policies and Related Indebtedness").
Costs of complying with governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect our income and the cash available for any distributions.
All real property and the operations conducted on real property are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Some of these laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on customers, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge such property as collateral for future borrowings.
34
Some of these laws and regulations have been amended so as to require compliance with new or more stringent standards as of future dates. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. Additionally, our customers' operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties may affect our properties. In addition, there are various local, state and federal fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply, and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance. Any material expenditures, fines, or damages we must pay will reduce our ability to make distributions and may reduce the value of your investment.
If we sell properties and provide financing to purchasers, defaults by the purchasers would adversely affect our cash flows.
If we decide to sell any of our properties, we presently intend to use our best efforts to sell them for cash. However, in some instances we may sell our properties by providing financing to purchasers. If we provide financing to purchasers, we will bear the risk that the purchaser may default, which could negatively impact our cash distributions to shareholders and result in litigation and related expenses. Even in the absence of a purchaser default, the distribution of the proceeds of sales to our shareholders, or their reinvestment in other assets, will be delayed until the promissory notes or other property we may accept upon a sale are actually paid, sold, refinanced or otherwise disposed of.
High mortgage rates may make it difficult for us to finance or refinance properties, which could reduce the number of properties we can acquire and the amount of cash distributions we can make.
If mortgage debt is unavailable at reasonable rates, we may not be able to finance the purchase of properties. If we place mortgage debt on properties, we run the risk of being unable to refinance such debt when the loans come due, or of being unable to refinance such debt on favorable terms. If interest rates are higher when we refinance such debt, our income could be reduced. We may be unable to refinance such debt at appropriate times, which may require us to sell properties on terms that are not advantageous to us, or could result in the foreclosure of such properties. If any of these events occur, our cash flow would be reduced. This, in turn, would reduce cash available for distribution to you and may hinder our ability to raise more capital by issuing more stock or by borrowing more money.
We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so.
The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property.
We may be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a property can be sold. We cannot assure you that we will have funds available to correct such defects or to make such improvements.
In acquiring a property, we may agree to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that property for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that property. These provisions would restrict our ability to sell a property.
35
If a sale and leaseback transaction is recharacterized, our financial condition could be adversely affected.
We may enter into sale and leaseback transactions, where we would purchase a property and then lease the same property back to the person from whom we purchased it. In the event of the bankruptcy of a customer, a transaction structured as a sale and leaseback may be recharacterized as either a financing or a joint venture, either of which outcomes could adversely affect our business.
If the sale and leaseback was recharacterized as a financing, we might not be considered the owner of the property, and as a result would have the status of a creditor in relation to the customer. In that event, we would no longer have the right to sell or encumber our ownership interest in the property. Instead, we would have a claim against the customer for the amounts owed under the lease, with the claim arguably secured by the property. The customer/debtor might have the ability to propose a plan restructuring the term, interest rate and amortization schedule of its outstanding balance. If confirmed by the bankruptcy court, we could be bound by the new terms, and prevented from foreclosing our lien on the property. These outcomes could adversely affect our cash flow and the amount available for distributions to you.
If the sale and leaseback were recharacterized as a joint venture, we and our customer could be treated as co-venturers with regard to the property. As a result, we could be held liable, under some circumstances, for debts incurred by the customer relating to the property. The imposition of liability on us could adversely affect our cash flow and the amount available for distributions to our stockholders. (See "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsSale-Leaseback Transactions").
If our customers are highly leveraged, they may have a higher possibility of filing for bankruptcy or insolvency.
Of our customers that experience downturns in their operating results due to adverse changes to their business or economic conditions, those that are highly leveraged may have a higher possibility of filing for bankruptcy or insolvency. In bankruptcy or insolvency, a customer may have the option of vacating a property instead of paying rent. Until such a property is released from bankruptcy, our revenues would be reduced and could cause us to reduce distributions to shareholders. We may have highly leveraged customers in the future. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaTerms of Leases and Customer Creditworthiness").
We may acquire properties with "lock-out" provisions which may affect our ability to dispose of the properties.
We may acquire properties through contracts that could restrict our ability to dispose of the property for a period of time. These "lock-out" provisions could affect our ability to turn our investments into cash and could affect cash available for distributions to you. Lock-out provisions could also impair our ability to take actions during the lock-out period that would otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders and, therefore, may have an adverse impact on the value of our shares, relative to the value that would result if the lock-out provisions did not exist.
We may acquire interests in partnerships and limited liability companies that could subject us to additional liabilities.
We may acquire partnership interests, including general partnership interests, in partnerships that could subject us to the liabilities of the partnership.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S PRIVATE PLACEMENT
Our operating partnership's private placement subjects us to liabilities.
Our operating partnership is currently offering undivided tenancy-in-common interests in industrial properties to accredited investors in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act. We anticipate that these tenancy-in-common interests may serve as replacement properties for
36
investors seeking to complete like-kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, the tenancy-in-common interests sold to investors will be 100% leased by our operating partnership, and such leases will contain purchase options whereby our operating partnership will have the right to acquire the tenancy-in-common interests from the investors at a later point in time in exchange for limited partnership units in our operating partnership under Section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code. Investors who acquire tenancy-in-common interests pursuant to our operating partnership's private placement may do so seeking certain tax benefits that depend on the interpretation of, and compliance with, extremely technical tax laws and regulations. As the general partner of our operating partnership, we may be subject to liability, from litigation or otherwise, as a result of these transactions, including in the event an investor fails to qualify for any desired tax benefits.
We have and may continue to acquire co-ownership interests in real property that are subject to certain co-ownership agreements which may affect our ability to operate or dispose of the property or our co-ownership interest.
We have and may continue to acquire co-ownership interests, especially in connection with our operating partnership's private placement, such as tenancy-in-common interests in industrial properties, that are subject to certain co-ownership agreements. The co-ownership agreements may limit our ability to encumber, lease, or dispose or our co-ownership interest. Such agreements could affect our ability to turn our investments into cash and could affect cash available for distributions to you. The co-ownership agreements could also impair our ability to take actions that would otherwise be in the best interest of our shareholders and, therefore, may have an adverse impact on the value of our shares, relative to the value that would result if the co-ownership agreements did not exist.
Our operating partnership's private placement is discussed in greater detail in the "Investment Objectives and CriteriaOur Operating Partnership's Private Placement" section of this prospectus.
Failure to qualify as a REIT could adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions.
We operate in a manner so as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2003. Although we do not intend to request a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service as to our REIT status, we will receive the opinion of our special tax counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, with respect to our qualification as a REIT. This opinion will be issued in connection with this offering. Investors should be aware, however, that opinions of counsel are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or on any court. The opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP represents only the view of our counsel based on our counsel's review and analysis of existing law and on certain representations as to factual matters and covenants made by us, including representations relating to the values of our assets and the sources of our income. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP has no obligation to advise us or the holders of our common stock of any subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed in its opinion or of any subsequent change in applicable law. Furthermore, both the validity of the opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of numerous requirements (some on an annual and quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex provisions of the Code for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. The fact that we hold substantially all of our assets through our operating partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements for us. No assurance can be given that we will qualify as a REIT for any particular year. See "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsGeneralREIT Qualification" and "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsRequirements for Qualification as a REIT."
37
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year for which a REIT election has been made, we would not be allowed a deduction for distributions paid to our shareholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at corporate rates. Moreover, unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, we would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost. This treatment would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to our shareholders because of the additional tax liability to us for the years involved. As a result of the additional tax liability, we might need to borrow funds or liquidate certain investments on terms that may be disadvantageous to us in order to pay the applicable tax, and we would not be compelled to make distributions under the Code.
To qualify as a REIT, we must meet annual distribution requirements.
To obtain the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs, among other requirements, we normally will be required each year to distribute to our shareholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the deduction for distributions paid and by excluding net capital gains. We will be subject to federal income tax on our undistributed taxable income and net capital gain. In addition, if we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (a) 85% of our ordinary income for such year, (b) 95% of our capital gain net income for such year, and (c) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, we would be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the sum of (i) the amounts actually distributed by us, plus (ii) retained amounts on which we pay income tax at the corporate level. These requirements could cause us to distribute amounts that otherwise would be spent on acquisitions or development of properties and it is possible that we might be required to borrow funds or sell assets to fund these distributions. Although we intend to make distributions sufficient to meet the annual distribution requirements and to avoid corporate income taxation on the earnings that we distribute, it is possible that we might not always be able to do so.
Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect our shareholders.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the federal income tax laws applicable to investments in REITs and similar entities. Additional changes to tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a shareholder. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our common stock. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in common stock.
Recharacterization of transactions under our operating partnership's private placement may result in a 100% tax on income from prohibited transactions, which would diminish our cash distributions to our shareholders.
The Internal Revenue Service could recharacterize transactions under our operating partnership's private placement such that our operating partnership is treated as the bona fide owner, for tax purposes, of properties acquired and resold by the entity established to facilitate the transaction. Such recharacterization could result in the income realized on these transactions by our operating partnership being treated as gain on the sale of property that is held as inventory or otherwise held primarily for the sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. In such event, such gain would constitute income from a prohibited transaction and would be subject to a 100% tax. If this occurs, our ability to pay cash distributions to our shareholders will be adversely affected.
You may have current tax liability on distributions you elect to reinvest in our common stock.
If you participate in our distribution reinvestment plan, you will be deemed to have received, and for income tax purposes will be taxed on, the amount reinvested in common stock to the extent the
38
amount reinvested was not a tax-free return of capital. As a result, you may have to use funds from other sources to pay your tax liability on the value of the common stock received.
In certain circumstances, we may be subject to federal and state income taxes as a REIT, which would reduce our cash available for distribution to you.
Even if we qualify and maintain our status as a REIT, we may be subject to federal income taxes or state taxes. For example, net income from a "prohibited transaction" will be subject to a 100% tax. In addition, we may not be able to make sufficient distributions to avoid excise taxes. We may also decide to retain certain gains from the sale or other disposition of our property and pay income tax directly on such gains. In that event, our stockholders would be required to include such gains in income and would receive a corresponding credit for their share of taxes paid by us. We may also be subject to state and local taxes on our income or property, either directly or at the level of our operating partnership or at the level of the other companies through which we indirectly own our assets. In addition, any net taxable income earned directly by the taxable REIT subsidiary we utilize to hold fractional interests in certain of our properties will be subject to federal and state corporate income tax. Any federal or state taxes we pay will reduce our cash available for distribution to you.
The opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP regarding our status as a REIT does not guarantee our ability to remain a REIT.
Our special tax counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, will render its opinion upon commencement of this offering that, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2003, we were organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT and our actual and proposed method of operation has enabled and will enable us to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT. This opinion is based upon our representations as to the manner in which we will be owned, invest in assets, and operate, among other things. The validity of the opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and our qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis, the results of which will not be monitored by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that we will satisfy the REIT requirements in any one taxable year. Also, the opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP represents counsel's legal judgment based on the law in effect as of the date of the commencement of this offering, is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, and could be subject to modification or withdrawal based on future legislative, judicial or administrative changes to the federal income tax laws, any of which could be applied retroactively.
If our operating partnership was classified as a "publicly traded partnership" under the Code, our status as a REIT and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.
Our operating partnership is organized as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Even though our operating partnership will not elect to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation, it may be taxed as a corporation if it is deemed to be a "publicly traded partnership." A publicly traded partnership is a partnership whose interests are traded on an established securities market or are considered readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof. We believe and currently intend to take the position that our operating partnership should not be classified as a publicly traded partnership because interests in our operating partnership are not traded on an established securities market, and our operating partnership should satisfy certain safe harbors which prevent a partnership's interests from being treated as readily tradable on an established securities market or substantial equivalent thereof. No assurance can be given, however, that the Internal Revenue Service would not assert that our operating partnership constitutes a publicly traded partnership, or that facts and circumstances will not develop which could result in our operating partnership being treated as a publicly traded partnership. If the Internal Revenue Service were to
39
assert successfully that our operating partnership is a publicly traded partnership, and substantially all of our operating partnership's gross income did not consist of the specified types of passive income, our operating partnership would be treated as an association taxable as a corporation and would be subject to corporate tax at the entity level. In such event, the character of our assets and items of gross income would change and would result in a termination of our status as a REIT. In addition, the imposition of a corporate tax on our operating partnership would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to you. See "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsFederal Income Tax Aspects of Our Partnership."
Foreign investors may be subject to FIRPTA tax on sale of common shares if we are unable to qualify as a "domestically controlled" REIT.
A foreign person disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to a tax, known as FIRPTA tax, on the gain recognized on the disposition. Such FIRPTA tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is a "domestically controlled REIT." A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its shares is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. holders. We cannot assure you that we will qualify as a domestically controlled REIT. If we were to fail to so qualify, gain realized by a foreign investor on a sale of our common stock would be subject to FIRPTA tax unless our common stock was traded on an established securities market and the foreign investor did not at any time during a specified testing period directly or indirectly own more than 5% of the value of our outstanding common stock. See "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsSpecial Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. ShareholdersNon-Dividend Distributions."
There are special considerations that apply to pension or profit sharing trusts or IRAs investing in common stock.
If you are investing the assets of an IRA, pension, profit sharing, 401(k), Keogh or other qualified retirement plan, you should satisfy yourself that:
For a more complete discussion of the foregoing issues and other risks associated with an investment in our common stock by retirement plans, please see the "ERISA Considerations" section of this prospectus.
40
The following table sets forth our best estimates of how we intend to use the gross proceeds from our offering assuming (i) 72,770,273 shares sold to the public and no shares sold pursuant to our Distribution Reinvestment Plan ("DRIP"), (ii) 72,770,273 shares sold to the public and 11,825,169 shares sold pursuant to our DRIP and (iii) 72,770,273 shares sold to the public and 23,650,339 shares sold pursuant to our DRIP. As of March 31, 2005, we had sold approximately 81.3 million shares in our public offerings, which included approximately 1.5 million shares issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. The number of distribution reinvestment plan shares sold in the future will depend on the level of continued shareholder participation in the distribution reinvestment plan and the length of time covered by this offering.
|
72,770,273 Shares Sold |
84,595,442 Shares Sold (Including 11,825,169 Pursuant to DRIP) |
96,420,612 Shares Sold (Including 23,650,339 Pursuant to DRIP) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dollars |
Percent |
Dollars |
Percent |
Dollars |
Percent |
||||||||||
Gross Proceeds | $ | 764,087,870 | 100.0% | $ | 882,043,935 | 100.0% | $ | 1,000,000,000 | 100.0% | |||||||
Less Public Offering Expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Sales Commissions(1) | 45,845,272 | 6.0% | 45,845,272 | 5.2% | 45,845,272 | 4.6% | ||||||||||
Dealer Manager Fee(1) | 15,281,757 | 2.0% | 15,281,757 | 1.7% | 15,281,757 | 1.5% | ||||||||||
DRIP Servicing Fee(2) | | | 1,241,643 | 0.1% | 2,483,286 | 0.3% | ||||||||||
Organization and Offering Expenses(3) | 15,281,757 | 2.0% | 15,281,757 | 1.7% | 15,281,757 | 1.5% | ||||||||||
Amount Available for Investment(4) | $ | 687,679,084 | 90.0% | $ | 804,393,506 | 91.2% | $ | 921,107,928 | 92.1% | |||||||
Acquisition and Development: | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition and Advisory Fees(5) | 6,876,791 | 0.9% | 8,043,935 | 0.9% | 9,211,079 | 0.9% | ||||||||||
Initial Working Capital Reserve(6) | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Amount Invested in Properties(4)(7) | $ | 680,802,293 | 89.1% | $ | 796,349,571 | 90.3% | $ | 911,896,849 | 91.2% | |||||||
41
42
but are not required to, establish reserves from gross offering proceeds, out of cash flow generated by operating properties or out of net sale proceeds in non-liquidating sale transactions.
43
Since February 10, 2003, the date of our initial issuance of common stock, through March 31, 2005 we have raised approximately $820 million in aggregate gross offering proceeds from the sale of our common stock, including the sale of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, of which approximately $143 million has been raised subsequent to December 31, 2004. These proceeds, net of commissions, fees and reimbursements, together with debt proceeds were used primarily to fund the acquisition of 112 industrial buildings.
Our Operating Partnership's Private Placement
Since November 26, 2003 through March 31, 2005, we have raised approximately $50.6 million in gross proceeds from our operating partnership's private placement of tenancy-in-common interests in industrial properties, of which approximately $18.0 million has been raised subsequent to December 31, 2004. Additionally, on April 8, 2005, our operating partnership issued approximately $4.45 million of limited partnership units in our operating partnership in conjunction with the exercise of a purchase option for an industrial property in which our operating partnership had sold tenancy-in-common interests. The unamortized portion of up-front fees and expense reimbursements paid to affiliates in conjunction with the initial sale of tenancy-in-common interests in this property were recorded against shareholders' equity as a selling cost of the limited partnership units issued. Our operating partnership's private placement is discussed in greater detail in the "Investment Objectives and CriteriaOur Operating Partnership's Private Placement" section of this prospectus.
Consistent with our investment strategy to invest in high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties, since March 31, 2005 through May 23, 2005, we have completed a number of property acquisitions with a total estimated investment of approximately $119 million.
Eastpark I, Eastpark II and Shelby 18 Distribution FacilitiesMemphis, TN
On April 6, 2005, and May 13, 2005, we acquired three distribution facilities totaling 1,626,262 square feet that are located in Memphis, Tennessee. The total estimated cost of these facilities is approximately $57.5 million (including an acquisition fee of $565,500 paid to the Advisor), which was paid from net proceeds from our public offering and the assumption of debt.
Miami Service CenterMiami, FL
On April 7, 2005, we acquired a service center comprising 49,384 square feet that is located in Miami, Florida. The total estimated cost of this facility is approximately $5.0 million (including an acquisition fee of $48,000 paid to the Advisor), which was paid from net proceeds from our public offering.
Delta PortfolioBaltimore, MD
On April 12, 2005, we acquired seven distribution facilities totaling 874,455 square feet that is located in Baltimore, Maryland. The total estimated cost of these facilities is approximately $43.2 million (including an acquisition fee of $425,000 paid to the Advisor), which was paid from net proceeds from our public offering and the assumption of debt.
44
Miami Commerce CenterMiami, FL
On April 13, 2005, we acquired a distribution facility comprising 201,399 square feet that is located in Miami, Florida. The total estimated cost of this facility is approximately $12.8 million (including an acquisition fee of $125,000 paid to the Advisor), which was paid from net proceeds from our public offering and the assumption of debt.
As of May 23, 2005, our portfolio consisted of 124 industrial buildings located in 19 of our 25 target markets. The combined investment in these properties totals approximately $970 million (including acquisition fees paid to our advisor).
45
The following table sets forth selected financial data relating to our historical financial condition and results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the periods ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. The table also sets forth selected financial data relating to the balance sheets as of March 31, 2005 and 2004 and December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. Since this information is only a summary, you should refer to the "Financial Statements" and the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" sections for additional information.
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002(1) |
|||||||||||
Operating Data: | ||||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 15,932,724 | $ | 2,981,658 | $ | 28,625,448 | $ | 2,289,074 | $ | | ||||||
Other real estate income | 3,669,321 | 600,253 | 6,052,863 | 356,019 | | |||||||||||
Total revenue | 20,212,435 | 3,595,235 | 35,553,182 | 2,706,457 | 155 | |||||||||||
Operating expenses and real estate taxes | 4,818,784 | 797,850 | 7,204,725 | 366,650 | | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 12,350,161 | 1,646,277 | 19,273,357 | 1,195,330 | | |||||||||||
Interest expense | 3,717,621 | 650,588 | 5,977,888 | 385,424 | | |||||||||||
General and administrative | 727,875 | 328,074 | 2,371,591 | 411,948 | 212,867 | |||||||||||
Asset management fees, related party | 1,179,473 | | 1,525,194 | | | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (2,581,479 | ) | $ | 172,446 | $ | (255,012 | ) | $ | 347,105 | $ | (12,712 | ) | |||
Per Share Data: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic earning (loss) per common share | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.09 | $ | (63.56 | ) | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.09 | $ | (63.56 | ) | |||
Common share distributions declared | $ | 11,743,700 | $ | 9,737,171 | $ | 24,263,891 | $ | 2,451,367 | $ | | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 74,420,520 | 16,579,579 | 37,907,838 | 3,987,429 | 200 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 74,400,520 | 16,599,579 | 37,927,838 | 4,007,429 | 200 |
|
As of March 31, |
As of December 31, |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: | ||||||||||||||||
Gross investment in real estate | $ | 855,269,990 | $ | 182,015,783 | $ | 754,063,569 | $ | 151,846,113 | $ | | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,002,934,882 | $ | 253,092,725 | $ | 784,808,270 | $ | 156,607,536 | $ | 751,678 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 305,299,949 | $ | 54,271,190 | $ | 203,593,467 | $ | 49,782,191 | $ | 761,390 | ||||||
Total shareholders' equity | $ | 697,633,933 | $ | 198,820,535 | $ | 581,213,803 | $ | 106,824,345 | $ | (10,712 | ) | |||||
Number of common shares outstanding | 81,319,720 | 22,799,467 | 67,719,883 | 12,470,400 | 200 |
46
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Dividend Capital Trust was formed as a Maryland corporation in April 2002 in order to invest in commercial real estate properties consisting primarily of high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties net leased to creditworthy corporate customers. In order to provide capital for these investments, we are selling our common stock through public offerings. We intend to continue raising significant amounts of capital through this offering and potential follow-on offerings, through our operating partnership's private placement more fully described below and through the issuance of debt.
Our primary focus is to build a diversified portfolio of properties in terms of geography and the industry group of our customers that will satisfy our corporate objectives of maximizing cash available for distributions to investors, preserving our capital, and realizing growth in the value of our portfolio over time.
The following discussion includes a quarter to quarter comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2005 with the three months ended March 31, 2004 and a year to year comparison of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the period from inception (April 12, 2002) through December 31, 2002. The year to year comparison primarily compares the years ended 2004 and 2003 as the period from inception through December 31, 2002 had very limited activity. In 2002, the year of our inception, we began the process of marketing the sale of our common stock under our first public offering. However, as described in more detail below, we did not sell any shares of our common stock until February 10, 2003. Furthermore, we acquired our first property in June of 2003 and therefore there were no rental activities during 2002. For the period ended December 31, 2002, we were considered a "development stage enterprise" and had only recognized a limited amount of general and administrative expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally, which we anticipate may have a material impact on either capital resources or the revenues or income to be derived from the operation of real estate properties. We believe that capital will continue to flow into the real estate industry and industrial real estate in particular, which will continue to foster a competitive environment for the assets we are seeking to acquire. Consequently, we, through the activities of our advisor, have assembled a team of 25 professionals with over 250 years of aggregate experience who are dedicated to the acquisition and operation of properties that meet our investment criteria. The ability of our advisor to find and acquire these properties at a pace that is consistent with the capital that is raised through our public offerings, our operating partnership's private placement and other financing activities will directly impact our financial performance and the metrics that management uses to evaluate our performance, including funds from operations available to pay dividends.
Management expects that our principal sources of working capital and funding for acquisitions and potential capital requirements for expansion and renovation of properties will include:
47
Over the short term, we believe that our sources of capital, specifically our cash flow from operations, borrowings under our credit facility and our ability to raise capital through public offerings and our operating partnership's private placement are adequate and will continue to be adequate to meet our liquidity requirements and capital commitments. These liquidity requirements and capital commitments include the payment of distributions, capital expenditures at our properties, forward purchase commitments (as more fully described below) and, as of May 10, 2005, the acquisition of 28 buildings which were then under contract or had closed since March 31, 2005. These buildings total 4.1 million square feet and have an aggregate purchase price of approximately $190.0 million. We anticipate that the acquisitions that have not yet closed will close over the next several months. However, the contracts related to such acquisitions are subject to a number of contingencies and there are no assurances that these acquisitions will transpire.
Over the longer term, we anticipate we will continue to utilize the same sources of capital we rely on to meet our short term liquidity requirements as well as additional secured and unsecured financings and capital from co-investment partners. We expect these resources will be adequate to fund our operating activities and distributions, which we presently anticipate will grow over time, and will be sufficient to fund our ongoing acquisition activities as well as providing capital for investment in future development and other joint ventures along with additional potential forward purchase commitments.
During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, cash generated from financing activities was approximately $190.0 million and $91.5 million, respectively. This increase was generally comprised of an increase in gross proceeds generated by our public offerings and our operating partnership's private placement of approximately $53.5 million compared to the same period in 2004. Additionally, cash provided by operating activities increased to approximately $10.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from approximately $3.1 million for the same period ended March 31, 2004 due to the additional properties owned during the 2005 period. These sources of capital were primarily utilized to fund approximately $76.5 million and $29.7 million of cash invested in real estate during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, cash generated from financing activities was approximately $558.0 million and $152.3 million, respectively. This increase was generally comprised of an increase in net proceeds generated by our public offerings and our operating partnership's private placement of approximately $405.6 million. Additionally, cash provided by operating activities increased from approximately $1.7 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 to approximately $21.5 million for the same period ended December 31, 2004. These sources of capital were primarily utilized to fund approximately $548.5 million and $149.6 million of cash invested in real estate in 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Our management anticipates that over time, cash provided by operating activities, debt proceeds and cash from co-investment partners will become a larger portion of our capital resources.
Public Offerings
On April 15, 2002, we filed an S-11 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering our first public offering of our common stock. The registration statement was declared effective on July 17, 2002 and we received approval of our offering in all 50 states in December 2002. The common stock was offered at a price of $10 per share on a 200,000 share minimum, 25,000,000 share maximum, best-efforts basis. The registration statement also covered up to 4,000,000 shares available pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan and up to 1,000,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants issued to the Dealer Manager for a price of $.001 per share for every 25 shares sold. Until we received subscriptions covering at least 200,000 shares from at least 100
48
non-affiliated investors, offering proceeds were required to be held in escrow. The escrow conditions were satisfied on February 10, 2003, at which time 226,567 shares of common stock were issued to investors. In April of 2004, we completed our first public offering and sold 24,998,691 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $249.2 million.
Our second offering began immediately following the completion of our initial offering. The second registration statement was filed on February 27, 2004, and was declared effective on April 16, 2004. The registration statement offered common stock at a price of $10 per share for a maximum of 30,000,000 shares. The registration statement also covered up to 10,000,000 shares available pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan as well as up to 1,200,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants sold to the Dealer Manager for a price of $.001 per share for every 25 shares sold. In October of 2004, we completed our second public offering and sold 29,997,723 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $299.0 million.
Our third offering began immediately following the completion of the second offering. The third registration statement was filed on June 28, 2004, and was declared effective on October 18, 2004. The registration statement offered common stock at a price of $10.50 per share for a maximum of 40,000,000 shares. The third registration statement also covered up to 13,000,000 shares available pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. As of March 31, 2005, we had sold 25,190,548 shares pursuant to our third public offering for total gross proceeds of approximately $264.1 million.
As of March 31, 2005, 81,319,720 common shares were issued and outstanding including shares sold pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan and net of shares redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program. The net proceeds from the sale of these securities were transferred to our operating partnership on a one-for-one basis for limited partnership units. Upon commencement, we intend to continue to sell shares in this offering and potential follow-on offerings, providing capital primarily for acquisitions and development joint ventures. We will continue to obtain debt financing and may cause our operating partnership to issue limited partnership interests to help fund property acquisitions.
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, our advisor is obligated to advance all of our organization and offering costs, subject to its right to be reimbursed for such costs by us in an amount up to 2% of the aggregate gross offering proceeds raised. Such organization and offering costs include but are not limited to actual legal, accounting, printing and other expenses attributable to preparing the Securities and Exchange Commission registration statements, qualification of the shares for sale in the states and filing fees incurred by our advisor, as well as reimbursements for marketing, salaries and direct expenses of its employees while engaged in registering and marketing the shares, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee (see below).
During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, our advisor incurred approximately $2.1 and $1.9 million of organization and offering costs, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we reimbursed our advisor approximately $2.8 and $1.9 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2005, the net un-reimbursed amount of organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor, since inception (April 12, 2002), was approximately $4.2 million.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for the period from inception (April 12, 2002) through December 31, 2002, our advisor incurred approximately $8.3, $7.7, and $3.4 million of organization and offering costs, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we reimbursed our advisor approximately $10.9 and $3.3 million, respectively. There were no reimbursements made during the period from inception (April 12, 2002) through December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2004, the net un-reimbursed amount of organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor, since inception (April 12, 2002), was approximately $5.2 million.
49
If we are not successful in raising additional amounts of equity proceeds, no additional amounts will be payable by us to our advisor for reimbursement of organization and offering costs.
Pursuant to the Dealer Manager Agreement, we are obligated to pay the Dealer Manager a dealer manager fee and commissions up to 2.0% and 6.0%, respectively, of gross proceeds raised from our public offerings of common stock.
As of March 31, 2005, all sales commissions had been re-allowed to participating broker-dealers. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we incurred approximately $10.8 million and $8.0 million, respectively, payable to the Dealer Manager for dealer manager fees and sales commissions.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we incurred amounts payable to the Dealer Manager of approximately $42.5 million and $11.2 million, respectively, of which $31.0 and $8.2 million, respectively had been re-allowed to broker-dealers participating in our public offerings. No payments were made to the Dealer Manager during 2002 as no shares were sold during this period.
Our Operating Partnership's Private Placement
Our operating partnership is currently offering undivided tenancy-in-common interests in industrial properties to accredited investors in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act. We anticipate that these tenancy-in-common interests may serve as replacement properties for investors seeking to complete like-kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, the tenancy-in-common interests sold to investors will be 100% leased by our operating partnership, and such leases will contain purchase options whereby our operating partnership will have the right to acquire the tenancy-in-common interests from the investors at a later point in time in exchange for limited partnership units, or DCX Units, in our operating partnership under Section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Our operating partnership will pay certain up-front fees and reimburse certain related expenses to the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and Dividend Capital Exchange Facilitators LLC (the "Facilitator" or our facilitator) for raising capital through the private placement. The Advisor is obligated to pay all of the offering and marketing related costs associated with the private placement. However, our operating partnership is obligated to pay the Advisor a non-accountable fee for such costs which equals 2% of the gross equity proceeds raised through this private placement. In addition, our operating partnership is obligated to pay the Dealer Manager a dealer manager fee of up to 1.5% of gross equity proceeds raised and a commission of up to 5% of gross equity proceeds raised through this private placement. The Dealer Manager may re-allow such commissions to the effecting broker dealers. Our operating partnership is also obligated to pay a transaction facilitation fee to the Facilitator, an affiliate of the Advisor, of up to 1.5% of gross equity proceeds raised.
During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we raised approximately $18.0 and $1.9 million, respectively, from the sale of undivided tenancy-in-common interests in our properties, which is included in financing obligations in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets (unaudited) pursuant to SFAS No. 98 "Accounting for Leases" ("SFAS No. 98").
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, and 2003, we raised $29.9 million and $2.7 million from the sale of undivided tenancy-in-common interests in our properties, which is similarly included in financing obligations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets pursuant to SFAS No. 98.
In accordance with SFAS No. 98, a portion of the rental payments made by our operating partnership to owners of tenancy-in-common interests will be recognized by our operating partnership as interest expense using the interest method.
50
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, and 2003, we incurred approximately $750,000 and $15,000 of rental expense under various lease agreements with these third party investors. A portion of such amounts were accounted for as a reduction of the principal outstanding balance of the financing obligations and a portion was accounted for as an increase to interest expense. The various lease agreements in place as of December 31, 2004, contain expiration dates ranging from November 2013, to July, 2019. The following table sets forth the five year, future minimum rental payments due to third parties under the various lease agreements:
The Year Ended December 31, |
Future Minimum Rental Payments |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | $ | 2,243,724 | ||
2006 | 3,518,026 | |||
2007 | 3,493,168 | |||
2008 | 3,363,775 | |||
2009 | 3,232,299 | |||
Thereafter | 9,795,806 | |||
Total | $ | 25,646,798 |
During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, our operating partnership incurred upfront costs of approximately $1.6 million and $190,000, respectively, payable to our advisor and other affiliates for affecting these transactions which are recorded as deferred loan costs. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, our operating partnership incurred upfront costs of approximately $2.6 and $0.2 million payable to our advisor and other affiliates for affecting these transactions. If our operating partnership elects to exercise any purchase option as described above and issue limited partnership units, the unamortized portion of the up-front fees and expense reimbursements paid to affiliates with respect to such transactions will be recorded against shareholders' equity as a selling cost of the limited partnership units. If our operating partnership does not elect to exercise any such purchase option, the remaining unamortized portion of the up-front fees and expense reimbursements paid to affiliates with respect to such transactions will be considered in the calculation of a gain or loss on the sale of real estate.
Financing
In January 2005, we entered into $57.0 million of secured, non-recourse debt with a stated fixed interest rate of 4.40% which matures in 2010. The underlying notes require monthly payments of interest only until January 1, 2006 at which time monthly payments of principal and interest will be required. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we assumed three secured, non-recourse notes, totaling $22.5 million, excluding premiums, in conjunction with the acquisition of Shelby 4, Shelby 5 and Shelby 19. These assumed notes bear fixed interest rates ranging from 5.69% to 7.40% and require monthly payments of principal and interest. The maturity dates of such assumed notes range from December 2013 to November 2022. Pursuant to SFAS No. 141 (see "Critical Accounting Policies" below), the difference between the fair value and face value of these assumed notes at the date of acquisition resulted in a premium of approximately $1.5 million, which will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the underlying notes.
In December 2004, we issued $55.0 million of secured, non-recourse debt. The debt has a stated fixed interest rate of 5.31% and matures in 2015. The underlying notes require monthly payments of interest only for one year and monthly payments of principal and interest thereafter. In December 2003, we issued $40.5 million of secured, non-recourse debt with a fixed interest rate of 5.00%, maturing in September 2011 and requiring monthly payments of principal and interest. During 2004, in conjunction with the acquisitions of Parkwest A, B and G, Mid-South Logistics Center V and Sky Harbor Transit Center, we assumed five secured, non-recourse notes totaling $45.6 million with stated interest rates ranging from 6.22% to 7.21%. All of these notes bear interest at a fixed rate and require monthly payments of principal and interest. They have maturity dates ranging from 2007 to
51
2012. Pursuant to SFAS No. 141, the difference between the fair value and face value of these notes at the date of acquisition resulted in a premium of approximately $2.9 million, which will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the underlying notes.
In October 2003, we entered into a $50.0 million secured revolving credit facility with JP Morgan Securities (formerly BankOne). In February 2004, the credit facility was amended and restated into a syndicated credit facility maturing in February 2007 and expanded commitments were received in July 2004 to reach its current capacity of $225.0 million. The credit facility currently bears interest at either LIBOR plus 1.125% to 1.500%, depending upon the level of our leverage, or, at our election, the prime rate and is subject to an annual 0.250% facility fee. This credit facility contains various covenants including financial covenants regarding net worth, interest and fixed charge coverage and consolidated leverage.
As of March 31, 2005, the gross book value of all of our properties was approximately $855.3 million and the gross book value of all properties securing our fixed rate mortgage debt and secured credit facility was approximately $353.4 million and $282.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, the gross book value of all of our properties was approximately $754.1 million and the gross book value of all properties securing our fixed rate mortgage debt and secured credit facility was approximately $310.6 million and $237.7 million, respectively. Our debt has various covenants and we believe we were in compliance with all of these covenants at March 31, 2005 and at December 31, 2004.
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance as of |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Stated Interest Rate |
Effective Interest Rate(4) |
Maturity Date |
March 31, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 |
|||||||||
Secured Mortgage Debt: | ||||||||||||||
ING Investment Management(2) | 4.40 | % | 5.42 | % | January 2010 | $ | 57,000,000 | $ | | |||||
ING Investment Management(2) | 5.31 | % | 5.34 | % | January 2015 | 55,000,000 | 55,000,000 | |||||||
New York Life | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | March 2011 | 39,748,376 | 39,953,415 | |||||||
Assumed Secured Mortgage Debt: | ||||||||||||||
Principal(1) | 7.08 | % | 4.81 | % | July 2008 | 17,061,397 | 17,174,107 | |||||||
State Farm(1) | 6.72 | % | 5.62 | % | November 2022 | 12,702,660 | | |||||||
Prudential(1) | 6.40 | % | 6.09 | % | November 2012 | 12,700,000 | 12,700,000 | |||||||
Principal(1) | 7.21 | % | 4.81 | % | July 2008 | 11,521,586 | 11,570,162 | |||||||
Prudential(1) | 5.69 | % | 5.22 | % | December 2013 | 8,254,722 | | |||||||
Principal(1) | 6.22 | % | 4.18 | % | September 2012 | 3,819,410 | 3,838,755 | |||||||
Legacy(1) | 7.40 | % | 5.21 | % | December 2017 | 1,480,037 | | |||||||
Weighted Avg./Totals(3) | 5.44 | % | 5.26 | % | $ | 219,288,188 | $ | 140,236,439 | ||||||
Premiums, Net of Amortization(1) | 3,833,990 | 2,518,329 | ||||||||||||
Carrying Value of Debt | $ | 223,122,178 | $ | 142,754,768 | ||||||||||
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility: | ||||||||||||||
JP Morgan | 5.75 | % | 5.75 | % | February 2007 | $ | 8,000 | $ | 4,000 | |||||
52
Forward Capital Commitment Agreement
In October 2004, we entered into a forward capital commitment with Wachovia Bank National Association ("Wachovia") in connection with our commitment to acquire two buildings located in Atlanta, Georgia, comprising 677,667 square feet from an unrelated third party developer. We have entered into this binding agreement with Wachovia, the construction lender, to purchase the two buildings at a price of up to $29.0 million. Our obligation to acquire the buildings from the developer upon completion can be satisfied under a variety of scenarios, mostly dependent upon leasing, with a minimum purchase price equal to actual development costs. In order to provide security to Wachovia under this capital commitment, we were required to place $4.9 million in escrow in lieu of a letter of credit. We anticipate funding this commitment with proceeds from our public offerings and debt.
Distributions
The payment of distributions is determined by our Board of Directors and may be adjusted at its discretion at any time. In December 2004 and 2003, our Board of Directors set the 2005 and 2004 distribution level at an annualized $0.64 per share. The distribution was set by our Board of Directors at a level we believe to be appropriate and sustainable based upon the evaluation of existing assets within our portfolio, anticipated acquisitions and projected levels of additional capital to be raised, debt to be incurred in the future and the anticipated results of operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, our board of directors declared distributions totaling approximately $11.7 million. No distributions were declared during the three months ended March 31, 2003. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, our board of directors declared distributions totaling approximately $24.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively. To fund total distributions, we utilized both funds from our operations and debt proceeds.
The short term dilution of operating results brought upon by the pace of raising capital meeting or exceeding the pace at which we have deployed such capital during the initial stages of our existence was anticipated and is a byproduct of our continued effort to build a high-quality portfolio. It is our objective to add accretive leverage to the balance sheet and to conservatively fund our distributions from funds from operations over time.
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
Pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, $6.3 million and $1.4 million of the distributions declared during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, was satisfied through the issuance of our common shares. For the same period in 2005 and 2004, 631,077 and 148,799 shares, respectively were issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at a 5.0% discount from our then current public offering share price. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, $12.9 million and $1.3 million of the distributions declared were satisfied through the issuance of our common shares. For the distributions declared for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, approximately 1.3 million and 132,000 shares, respectively were issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan at a 5.0% discount from our then current public offering share price.
53
The following table reflects our contractual obligations as December 31, 2004, specifically our obligations under long-term debt agreements and operating lease agreements and our purchase obligations:
|
Payments due by Period |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contractual Obligations |
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
3-5 Years |
More Than 5 Years |
|||||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 193,762,600 | $ | 9,361,181 | $ | 21,012,764 | $ | 43,417,170 | $ | 119,971,485 | ||||||
Operating leases(1) | 25,646,798 | 2,243,724 | 7,011,194 | 6,596,074 | 9,795,806 | |||||||||||
Purchase obligation(2) | 29,000,000 | | 29,000,000 | | | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 248,409,398 | $ | 11,604,905 | $ | 57,023,958 | $ | 50,013,244 | $ | 129,767,291 | ||||||
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004, respectively, and as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Summary of the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004
As of March 31, 2005, we owned 112 properties located in 17 markets across the United States, 97 of which were acquired after March 31, 2004. As a result of the acquisition of 97 properties subsequent to March 31, 2004, the revenues and expenses from our operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 reflect a significant increase compared to the revenues and expenses from our
54
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The following table describes our portfolio as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively:
|
As of March 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
||||||||||||||||||
Market |
Number of Buildings |
Gross Book Value |
Gross Leasable Area |
Occupancy(1) |
Number of Buildings |
Gross Book Value |
Gross Leasable Area |
Occupancy(1) |
||||||||||||
Atlanta | 18 | $ | 147,536,587 | 3,946,931 | 88.0 | % | 1 | $ | 15,051,295 | 414,160 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Boston | 5 | 26,897,276 | 405,741 | 78.2 | % | | | | | |||||||||||
Chicago | 2 | 33,096,000 | 661,785 | 100.0 | % | 1 | 11,369,570 | 222,122 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Cincinnati | 7 | 78,930,383 | 1,797,369 | 97.6 | % | 3 | 26,241,585 | 470,957 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Dallas | 18 | 93,181,861 | 2,330,906 | 90.6 | % | 3 | 40,711,130 | 982,776 | 86.8 | % | ||||||||||
Denver | 1 | 8,999,806 | 160,232 | 100.0 | % | | | | | |||||||||||
Houston | 21 | 83,807,929 | 1,622,270 | 88.2 | % | 1 | 8,596,927 | 189,467 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Indianapolis | 1 | 15,186,262 | 442,127 | 100.0 | % | 1 | 15,559,470 | 442,127 | 68.3 | % | ||||||||||
Los Angeles | 4 | 32,743,856 | 444,066 | 100.0 | % | 1 | 10,317,311 | 201,493 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Louisville | 2 | 18,350,820 | 521,000 | 100.0 | % | | | | | |||||||||||
Memphis | 7 | 114,199,030 | 3,115,756 | 99.3 | % | 2 | 14,888,160 | 392,006 | 94.2 | % | ||||||||||
Nashville | 3 | 59,340,369 | 1,699,530 | 100.0 | % | 2 | 39,280,336 | 1,179,530 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Orlando | 2 | 15,779,127 | 367,137 | 100.0 | % | | | | | |||||||||||
Philadelphia | 1 | 5,163,291 | 100,000 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Phoenix | 13 | 78,945,463 | 1,474,963 | 87.5 | % | | | | | |||||||||||
San Antonio | 2 | 7,724,491 | 172,050 | 100.0 | % | | | | | |||||||||||
San Francisco | 5 | 35,387,439 | 474,636 | 100.0 | % | | | | | |||||||||||
Total | 112 | $ | 855,269,990 | 19,736,499 | 93.8 | % | 15 | $ | 182,015,784 | 4,494,638 | 93.5 | % | ||||||||
Description of the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004
Although we recognized a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to net income for the three months ended March 31, 2004, our cash provided by operating activities increased from approximately $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to approximately $10.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. This increase is primarily a result of the acquisitions noted above. The fact that we recognized a net loss despite an increase in operating activities as described above is primarily a result of depreciation. Depreciation as a percent of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was 61.1% and 45.8%, respectively. This difference was primarily a result of proportionately more value being attributed to tenant improvements and intangible assets, pursuant to the SFAS No. 141, associated with in-place leases. The acquisitions made subsequent to March 31, 2004 have proportionately higher tenant improvements associated with smaller demised spaces and thus higher rental rates causing in-place leases to have a greater value. This in turn resulted in proportionately greater depreciation and amortization expense recognized for the first quarter of the 2005 as the remaining life of such assets is significantly shorter than other long-lived assets such as building and building improvements (see "Note 1Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)).
55
The following table illustrates the relative allocation of the costs of our properties as of March 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
As of March 31, |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
||||||||
|
Balance |
% of Total |
Balance |
% of Total |
||||||
Land | 134,763,015 | 15.9 | % | 20,968,862 | 11.6 | % | ||||
Land Improvements | 63,617,720 | 7.5 | % | 10,933,561 | 6.1 | % | ||||
Building | 508,141,044 | 60.0 | % | 124,131,386 | 68.7 | % | ||||
Lease Related Assets(1) | 140,735,535 | 16.6 | % | 24,521,838 | 13.6 | % | ||||
Total | 847,257,314 | 100.0 | % | 180,555,647 | 100.0 | % | ||||
The components of the increase in operating activities are reflected in the changes in rental revenues, interest and other income, property operating expenses and other expenses as more fully described below.
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rental Revenues and Other Real Estate Income |
|
|||||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
$ Change |
||||||||||
Base rental revenue: | ||||||||||||
Same store | $ | 3,021,924 | $ | 2,820,028 | $ | 201,896 | ||||||
2005 acquisitions | 970,687 | | 970,687 | |||||||||
2004 acquisitions | 11,582,649 | 57,644 | 11,525,005 | |||||||||
Other real estate income | 3,669,321 | 600,253 | 3,069,068 | |||||||||
Straight-line rents | 800,501 | 117,994 | 682,507 | |||||||||
Above and below market rents, net | (443,037 | ) | (14,008 | ) | (429,029 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 19,602,045 | $ | 3,581,911 | 16,020,134 | |||||||
Rental revenues and other real estate income were higher in the three months ended March 31, 2005 than in the three months ended March 31, 2004, primarily due to the operations of 97 properties acquired subsequent to March 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, we owned 112 and 15 properties, respectively. The increase in straight-line rents over the same periods is mainly attributable to the revenue generated by newly acquired leases resulting from the 97 aforementioned property acquisitions. The decrease in above and below market rents is due to the majority of the properties acquired subsequent to March 31, 2004 having leases with rental rates proportionately higher than market rental rates measured at the time of acquisition.
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest and Other Income |
|
||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
$ Change |
|||||||
Interest and other income | $ | 610,390 | $ | 13,324 | $ | 597,066 | |||
Interest and other income consist primarily of interest income on cash balances and notes receivable. The increase in interest income is due to higher cash balances held in interest bearing bank accounts during the three months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. In addition, we had $8.2 million in notes receivable outstanding as of March 31, 2005, $7.5 million of which was issued subsequent to March 31, 2004, to a third-party national real estate
56
developer. Collectively, these notes earned interest income of approximately $133,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to $2,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Property Operating Expenses |
|
||||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
$ Change |
|||||||||
Properties: | |||||||||||
Same store | $ | 823,088 | $ | 796,900 | $ | 26,188 | |||||
2005 acquisitions | 71,268 | | 71,268 | ||||||||
2004 acquisitions | 3,924,428 | 950 | 3,923,478 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 4,818,784 | $ | 797,850 | $ | 4,020,934 | |||||
Property operating expenses were higher in the three months ended March 31, 2005 than in the three months ended March 31, 2004, primarily due to the operations of 97 properties acquired subsequent to March 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, we owned 112 and 15 properties, respectively.
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Expenses |
|
|||||||||
2005 |
2004 |
$ Change |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 12,350,161 | $ | 1,646,277 | $ | 10,703,884 | ||||
Interest | 3,717,621 | 650,588 | 3,067,033 | |||||||
General and administrative | 727,875 | 328,074 | 399,801 | |||||||
Asset management fees, related party | 1,179,473 | | 1,179,473 | |||||||
Total | $ | 17,975,130 | $ | 2,624,939 | $ | 15,350,191 | ||||
The increase in interest expense is attributable to higher mortgage note balances and higher financing obligation balances that were outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. Depreciation and amortization expense was higher during the three months ended March 31, 2005, than in the three months ended March 31, 2004, primarily due to the acquisition of 97 additional properties with a gross book value of $674.7 million. General and administrative expenses were higher during the three months ended March 31, 2005 than in the three months ended March 31, 2004 as a result of increased compliance costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and an increase in general business activities. The increase in asset management fees payable to our advisor (see "Note 8Related Party Transactions" to the condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited)) was attributable to the aforementioned acquisition of additional properties.
Summary of the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to the year ended December 31, 2003
In June 2003, we acquired our first property and through December 31, 2004, we had acquired an additional 105 properties that were funded from net proceeds from our public offerings, our operating partnership's private placement and debt proceeds. As a result of these acquisitions, and because during the twelve months ended December 31, 2003, we had limited operations, the revenues and expenses from our operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 reflected a significant increase compared to the revenues and expenses from our operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003.
57
The following table summarizes our acquisition activity for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Transaction |
Date |
Number of Markets |
Number of Buildings |
Gross Leasable Area |
Approximate Total Acquisition Cost(1) |
Occupancy at Acquisition(2) |
Occupancy at 12/31/04(2) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 Acquisitions: | ||||||||||||||||
Eastgate | 3/19 | 1 | 1 | 423,500 | $ | 14,796,664 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Newpoint I | 3/31 | 1 | 1 | 414,160 | 15,051,295 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
MassPrim | 5/03 | 2 | 2 | 426,500 | 14,875,607 | 89.7 | % | 89.7 | % | |||||||
Bondesen, Beltway, Rittiman Business Parks | 6/03 | 2 | 13 | 798,412 | 50,817,159 | 84.4 | % | 99.1 | % | |||||||
Eagles Landing & SouthCreek I, II & III(3) | 6/08 / 9/21 | 1 | 4 | 1,761,874 | 53,048,730 | 73.0 | % | 73.0 | % | |||||||
AREP | 6/08 / 6/29 | 2 | 4 | 1,719,912 | 67,941,804 | 95.8 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Memphis Trade Center | 6/22 | 1 | 1 | 709,000 | 24,859,076 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Trade Pointe III | 9/28 | 1 | 1 | 221,000 | 8,259,775 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Interpark 70 | 9/30 | 1 | 1 | 160,232 | 8,949,122 | 82.8 | % | 82.8 | % | |||||||
RN Portfolio | 10/01 | 6 | 53 | 4,890,753 | 238,897,395 | 84.3 | % | 85.1 | % | |||||||
Cypress Park East | 10/22 | 1 | 2 | 367,137 | 15,681,760 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Bayside Distribution | 11/03 | 1 | 2 | 340,765 | 22,128,638 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Norcross Facilities | 11/05 | 1 | 2 | 458,426 | 17,708,926 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Sky Harbor Transit Center | 11/24 | 1 | 1 | 145,228 | 10,131,396 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
C&L Facilities | 12/03 | 2 | 2 | 445,636 | 19,016,457 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Foothill Business Center | 12/9 | 1 | 3 | 242,573 | 22,426,545 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Total 2004 Acquisitions | 8 | 93 | 13,525,108 | $ | 604,590,349 | 88.8 | % | 90.5 | % | |||||||
2003 Acquisitions: | ||||||||||||||||
Bridgestone/Firestone | 6/9 | 1 | 1 | 756,030 | $ | 24,483,672 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Chickasaw | 7/22 | 1 | 2 | 392,006 | 14,977,799 | 94.2 | % | 94.2 | % | |||||||
Rancho | 10/16 | 1 | 1 | 201,493 | 9,838,394 | 50.1 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Mallard Lake | 10/29 | 1 | 1 | 222,122 | 11,369,570 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
West by Northwest | 10/30 | 1 | 1 | 189,467 | 8,596,927 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Park West | 12/15 | 1 | 3 | 470,957 | 26,241,585 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Pinnacle | 12/15 | 1 | 2 | 730,000 | 29,441,260 | 89.0 | % | 89.0 | % | |||||||
DFW | 12/15 | 1 | 1 | 252,776 | 11,372,841 | 80.2 | % | 80.2 | % | |||||||
Plainfield I | 12/22 | 1 | 1 | 442,127 | 15,663,010 | 68.3 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Total 2003 Acquisitions | 8 | 13 | 3,656,978 | $ | 151,985,058 | 89.2 | % | 95.8 | % | |||||||
Total Acquisition Activity | 16 | 106 | 17,182,086 | $ | 756,575,407 | 88.9 | % | 91.6 | % | |||||||
Description of the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003
Although we recognized a net loss in 2004 compared to net income in 2003, our cash provided by operating activities increased from approximately $1.7 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 to approximately $21.5 million for the same period ended December 31, 2004. This increase is primarily a product of the acquisitions noted above. We recognized a net loss of $255,012 for the year ended December 31, 2004, and we recognized net income of $347,105 for the year ended
58
December 31, 2003. The fact that we recognized a net loss despite the increase in operating activities as noted above is primarily a result of changes in depreciation. Depreciation in 2004 and 2003 as a percentage of revenues was 53.4% and 44.2%, respectively. This difference was primarily a result of the allocation, pursuant to SFAS No. 141, of the total costs of the 2004 acquisitions resulting in proportionately more value being attributed to tangible and intangible assets associated with in-place leases. This in turn resulted in proportionately greater depreciation and amortization expense recognized in 2004 as the remaining life of such assets is significantly shorter than other long-lived assets such as building and building improvements. The following table illustrates the relative allocation of the cost of our 2004 and 2003 property acquisitions to the various tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2004.
|
As of December 31, 2004 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 Acquisitions |
2003 Acquisitions |
Total |
|||||||||||
|
Balance |
% of Total |
Balance |
% of Total |
Balance |
% of Total |
||||||||
Land | 102,674,285 | 17.2 | % | 17,380,389 | 11.6 | % | 120,054,674 | 16.0 | % | |||||
Land improvements | 46,068,215 | 7.7 | % | 7,105,857 | 4.8 | % | 53,174,072 | 7.1 | % | |||||
Building | 347,084,236 | 58.0 | % | 105,119,212 | 70.5 | % | 452,203,448 | 60.5 | % | |||||
Lease related assets(1) | 102,959,730 | 17.1 | % | 19,591,236 | 13.1 | % | 122,550,966 | 16.4 | % | |||||
Total | 598,786,467 | 100.0 | % | 149,196,694 | 100.0 | % | 747,983,160 | 100.0 | % | |||||
The components of the increase in operating activities are reflected in the changes in rental revenues and other real estate income, interest income and other income, property operating expenses and other expenses as more fully described below.
Rental Revenues and Other Real Estate Income |
2004 |
2003 |
$ Change |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Properties: | ||||||||||||
2004 acquisitions | $ | 19,207,389 | $ | | $ | 19,207,389 | ||||||
2003 acquisitions | 14,176,482 | 2,554,422 | 11,622,060 | |||||||||
Straight-line rents | 2,134,194 | 85,420 | 2,048,774 | |||||||||
Above and below market rents | (839,754 | ) | 5,251 | (845,005 | ) | |||||||
Total | $ | 34,678,311 | $ | 2,645,093 | $ | 32,033,218 | ||||||
Rental revenues and other real estate income for the 2003 acquired properties were higher in 2004 than in 2003 as property revenues associated with properties acquired during 2003 do not reflect an entire period of operations as compared to 2004 wherein these properties were operating for a full twelve months. The increase in straight-line rents over the same periods is attributable to the revenue generated by newly acquired leases resulting from 2003 and 2004 property acquisitions. The decrease in above and below market rents is primarily due to certain leases acquired in 2004 generally having rental rates above market rental rates and that difference being amortized against rental revenues in accordance with SFAS No. 141.
Interest Income and Other Income |
2004 |
2003 |
$ Change |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest and other income | $ | 874,871 | $ | 61,364 | $ | 813,507 | ||||
Gain on hedging activities | 544,561 | | 544,561 | |||||||
Total | $ | 1,419,432 | $ | 61,364 | $ | 1,358,068 | ||||
59
Interest income consists primarily of interest income on cash balances and notes receivable with the increase in interest income due to higher cash balances held in interest bearing bank accounts during 2004 as compared to 2003. In addition, as a part of a development joint venture, we issued approximately $4.2 million in notes receivable to a third-party national real estate developer during 2004 (See "Note 8Notes Receivable" to the consolidated financial statements). These notes earned interest income of approximately $267,498 during 2004.
The gain on hedging activity was a result of a hedging transaction that settled on September 30, 2004, which resulted in a gain of $544,561 that was included in other income as a result of ineffectiveness. The ineffectiveness resulted because the fair values of the hedges increased between the date we locked the interest rate of our anticipated debt issuance and the settlement, or valuation, date of the hedges.
Operating Expenses |
2004 |
2003 |
$ Change |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Properties: | |||||||||||
2004 acquisitions | $ | 4,157,260 | $ | | $ | 4,157,260 | |||||
2003 acquisitions | 3,047,465 | 366,650 | 2,680,815 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 7,204,725 | $ | 366,650 | $ | 6,838,075 | |||||
Property operating expenses for the 2003 acquired properties were higher in 2004 than in 2003 as property operating expenses associated with properties acquired during 2003 do not reflect an entire period of operations as compared to 2004 wherein these properties were operating for a full twelve months. In addition, the increase in operating expenses in 2004 as compared to 2003 is attributable to the operating expenses resulting from 2004 property acquisitions.
Other Expenses |
2004 |
2003 |
$ Change |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest | $ | 5,977,888 | $ | 385,424 | $ | 5,592,464 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 19,273,357 | 1,195,330 | 18,078,027 | |||||||
General and Administrative | 3,896,785 | 411,948 | 3,484,837 | |||||||
Total | $ | 29,148,030 | $ | 1,992,702 | $ | 27,155,328 | ||||
In December 2003, we issued $40.5 million of mortgage notes which were outstanding during 2004. In addition, in conjunction with property acquisitions during 2004, we assumed $45.6 million of mortgage debt. These transactions combined with periodic borrowings under our secured credit facility, caused interest expense to increase significantly in 2004. Depreciation and amortization expense was higher in 2004 than in 2003 primarily due to the acquisition of an additional 93 properties with an approximate total cost of $604.6 million and a full year's depreciation of 2003 acquisitions. General and administrative expenses were higher in 2004 than 2003 due to the aforementioned acquisition of properties and resulting asset management fees payable to our advisor of approximately $1.5 million. We did not incur any asset management fees during 2003. In addition, increased audit costs and costs associated with consulting services specific to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of approximately $888,000 and an increase in general business activities also contributed to the increase in general and administrative expenses.
General
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and
60
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following discussion pertains to accounting policies management believes are most "critical" to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations which require management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets held and used are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 provides that such an evaluation should be performed when events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted. Examples include the point at which we deem the long-lived asset to be held for sale, downturns in the economy, etc. Impairment of long-lived assets is considered a "critical accounting estimate" because the evaluation of impairment and the determination of fair values involve a number of management assumptions relating to future economic events that could materially affect the determination of the ultimate value, and therefore, the carrying amounts of our real estate. Such assumptions include, but are not limited to, projecting vacancy rates, rental rates, property operating expenses, capital expenditures and debt financing rates, among other things. The capitalization rate is also a significant driving factor in determining the property valuation which requires management's judgment of factors such as market knowledge, historical experience, lease terms, customer financial strength, economy, demographics, environment, property location, visibility, age, physical condition and investor return requirements, among other things. All of the aforementioned factors are taken as a whole by management in determining the valuation of investment property. The valuation is sensitive to the actual results of any of these uncertain factors, either individually or taken as a whole. Should the actual results differ from management's judgment, the valuation could be negatively affected.
Valuation and Allocation of Real Estate Acquisitions
Upon acquisition, the purchase price of a property and other costs associated with the acquisition such as the acquisition fee paid to our advisor are capitalized and allocated to land, building, land improvements, tenant improvements and other intangible assets and associated liabilities as required by SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." The allocation to land, building, land improvements and tenant improvements will be based on management's estimate of its fair value based on all available information. The allocation to intangible lease assets, as required by SFAS No. 141, represents the value associated with the in-place leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related costs. Also, SFAS No. 141 requires the creation of an intangible asset or liability resulting from in-place leases being above or below the current market rental rates on the date of the acquisition. This asset or liability will be amortized over the life of the remaining in-place leases as an adjustment to revenue. Pursuant to SFAS No. 141, the difference between the fair value and the face value of debt assumed in an acquisition should be recorded as a premium or discount and amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt assumed. Valuation and allocation of real estate acquisitions is considered a critical accounting policy because the determination of the value and allocation of the cost of a real estate acquisition involves a number of management's assumptions relating to the ability to lease vacant space, market rental rates, term of new leases, property operating expenses and leasing commissions, among other things. All of the aforementioned factors will be taken as a whole by management in determining the valuation and allocation of the costs of real estate acquisitions. The valuation and allocation is sensitive to the actual results of any of these uncertain factors, either individually or taken as a whole.
61
Should the actual results differ from management's judgment, the valuation and allocation could be negatively affected and may result in a negative impact to the financial statements.
Interest Rate Contracts
Under SFAS 133/138 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as amended, the resulting assets and liabilities associated with derivative financial instruments are carried on the financial statements at estimated fair value at the end of each reporting period. The change in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges are carried on our financial statements as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If deemed effective pursuant to SFAS 133/138 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", these hedges will impact the amount recorded as interest expense.
Valuation of Accounts and Rent Receivable
Periodically, management will assess the collectability of accounts and rent receivable balances in order to determine if an adjustment to the value of these balances is necessary. Management will take into consideration certain factors that require judgments to be made as to the collectability of receivables. Collectability factors taken into consideration will be the amounts outstanding, payment history and financial strength of the customer, which taken as a whole, determines the valuation.
New Accounting Principles
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46R, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity's activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns or both. FIN 46 requires disclosures about variable interest entities that a company is not required to consolidate, but in which it has a significant variable interest. The consolidation requirements apply to existing public entities as of March 31, 2004. We do not believe that any of our consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures are variable interest entities under the provisions of FIN 46.
62
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market conditions such as prices and interest rates. Our future earnings and cash flows are dependent upon prevailing market rates. Accordingly, we manage our market risk by matching projected cash inflows from operating, investing and financing activities with projected cash outflows for debt service, acquisitions, capital expenditures, distributions to shareholders and unitholders, and other cash requirements. The majority of our outstanding debt has fixed interest rates, which minimizes our risk related to fluctuating interest rates.
Our exposure to market risk includes interest rate fluctuations in connection with our credit facility and forecasted fixed rate debt issuances, including refinancing of existing fixed rate debt. Interest rate risk may result from many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors that are beyond our control. To manage interest rate risk for forecasted issuances of fixed rate debt, we primarily use treasury locks as part of our cash flow hedging strategy. A treasury lock is designed to mitigate the risk of future interest rate fluctuations by providing a future fixed interest rate for a limited pre-determined period of time. During 2004 and the first quarter of 2005, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with $250 million of forecasted issuances of debt. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors.
As of March 31, 2005, we had three treasury lock hedges which had not been settled and were, therefore, subject to variability based upon market interest rates and, as of December 31, 2004, we had one treasury lock which had not been attributed to a specific debt issuance and was, therefore, also subject to variability based upon market interest rates. We estimate the fair value of our treasury lock agreements by calculating the present value of the difference between the corresponding locked treasury rates and the expected yield on the specific treasury obligations referenced in the treasury lock agreement. Based upon this calculation,
Similarly, our variable rate debt is subject to risk based upon prevailing market interest rates. If the prevailing market interest rates relevant to our variable rate debt as of March 31, 2005, were to increase 10% (0.575%, based upon prevailing market rates at March 31, 2005), it would not have a material effect on the results of our operations. Furthermore, if the prevailing market interest rates relevant to our variable rate debt as of December 31, 2004, were to increase 10% (0.525%, based upon prevailing market rates at December 31, 2004), it would also not have a material effect on the results of our operations.
As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the estimated fair value of our debt was $220.7 million and $143.0 million, respectively, based on our estimate of the then current market interest rates.
63
We operate under the direction of our board of directors, the members of which are accountable to us and our shareholders as fiduciaries. The board is responsible for the management and control of our affairs. The board has retained the Advisor, subject to the board's approval and oversight, to manage our day-to-day affairs and the acquisition and disposition of our investments. Our articles of incorporation were reviewed and ratified by our board of directors, including our independent directors, at their initial meeting.
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that the number of our directors may be established by a majority of the entire board of directors but may not be fewer than three nor more than fifteen. We currently have a total of seven directors. Our articles of incorporation also provide that a majority of the directors must be independent directors. An "independent director" is a person who is not an officer or employee of Dividend Capital Trust, the Advisor or their affiliates and has not otherwise been affiliated with such entities for the previous two years. Of our seven current directors, four are considered to be independent directors.
Pursuant to our bylaws and the Maryland General Corporation Law, each director will serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his successor has been duly elected and qualified. Our 2004 annual meeting was intended to be held on June 15, 2004, primarily to re-elect our current board members; however, a quorum was not reached. Our annual meeting was therefore adjourned until August 12, 2004. Despite the efforts of our proxy solicitor, we were unable to obtain a quorum on August 12, 2004 and pursuant to our bylaws, our directors will continue in their current capacity as board members until their successors have been duly elected. The next election of our board members is anticipated to be held at our annual meeting which has been scheduled for June 14, 2005. Although the number of directors may be increased or decreased, a decrease shall not have the effect of shortening the term of any incumbent director.
Any director may resign at any time and may be removed with or without cause by the shareholders upon the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at a meeting called for the purpose of the proposed removal. The notice of the meeting shall indicate that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to determine if the director shall be removed.
Unless filled by a vote of our shareholders as permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, a vacancy created by an increase in the number of directors or the death, resignation, removal, adjudicated incompetence or other incapacity of a director shall be filled by a vote of a majority of the remaining directors and:
If at any time there are no independent or affiliated directors in office, these successor directors shall be elected by the shareholders. Each director will be bound by the articles of incorporation and the bylaws.
Our directors are not required to devote all of their time to our business and are only required to devote the time to our affairs as their duties require. Our directors will meet quarterly or more frequently if necessary. We do not expect that our directors will be required to devote a substantial portion of their time to discharge their duties as our directors. Consequently, in the exercise of their
64
fiduciary responsibilities, our directors will be relying heavily on the Advisor. Our board is empowered to fix the compensation of all officers that it may select and may pay compensation to independent directors for services rendered to us in any other capacity.
Our general investment and borrowing policies are set forth in this prospectus. Our directors may establish further written policies on investments and borrowings and shall monitor our administrative procedures, investment operations and performance to ensure that the policies are fulfilled and are in the best interest of our shareholders. We will follow the policies on investments and borrowings set forth in this prospectus unless and until they are modified by our directors.
Our board is also responsible for reviewing all of our fees and expenses at least annually and with sufficient frequency to determine that the expenses incurred are in the best interest of our shareholders. In addition, a majority of our independent directors and a majority of directors not otherwise interested in the transaction must approve all transactions with the Advisor or its affiliates. Our independent directors will also be responsible for reviewing the performance of the Advisor and determining that the compensation to be paid to the Advisor is reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of services to be performed and that the provisions of the Advisory Agreement are being carried out. Specifically, our independent directors will consider factors such as:
Neither our directors nor their affiliates will vote or consent to the voting of shares they now own or hereafter acquire on matters submitted to the shareholders regarding either (1) the removal of the Advisor, any director or any affiliate of the Advisor, or (2) any transaction between us and the Advisor, any director or any affiliate of the Advisor.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our entire board of directors considers all major decisions concerning our business. However, our board has established an Investment Committee, Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee so that issues arising in these areas can be addressed in more depth and with greater frequency than may be possible with a full board meeting.
Investment Committee
The Investment Committee's primary function is to review, evaluate and ultimately vote to approve acquisitions or developments proposed by the Advisor of up to $25 million. Proposed acquisitions or developments in excess of $25 million require approval by the board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors. The Investment Committee is required to include three directors, at least two of whom must be independent directors, and is currently comprised of Tripp H. Hardin, John C. O'Keeffe and Thomas G. Wattles.
65
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee meets on a regular basis (and meets at least once annually) throughout the year as necessary. The Audit Committee's primary function is to assist the board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial information to be provided to the shareholders and others, the system of internal controls which management has established, and the audit and financial reporting process all in accordance with our Audit Committee Charter. The Audit Committee is comprised of three directors, two of whom shall be independent directors. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Tripp H. Hardin, John C. O'Keeffe and Thomas G. Wattles.
Compensation Committee
Our board of directors has established a Compensation Committee to administer our Employee Option Plan, as described below. The Compensation Committee is comprised of three directors, two of whom shall be independent directors. The primary function of the Compensation Committee is to administer the granting of stock options to selected employees of the Advisor and our property manager based upon recommendations from the Advisor, and to set the terms and conditions of such options in accordance with the Employee Option Plan. The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of James R. Mulvihill, Robert F. Masten and Lars O. Soderberg.
Directors and Executive Officers
The directors and executive officers of Dividend Capital Trust, their ages and their positions and offices are as follows:
Name |
Age |
Position |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Thomas G. Wattles | 53 | Chairman, Chief Investment Officer and Director | ||
Evan H. Zucker | 40 | Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Director | ||
James R. Mulvihill | 40 | Chief Financial Officer and Director | ||
Tripp H. Hardin | 44 | Director* | ||
Robert F. Masten | 55 | Director* | ||
John C. O'Keeffe | 45 | Director* | ||
Lars O. Soderberg | 46 | Director* |
Thomas G. Wattles, age 53, is the Chairman, Chief Investment Officer and a director of Dividend Capital Trust, a manager and Chief Investment Officer of Dividend Capital Advisors and a manager of Dividend Capital Property Management. Mr. Wattles is a principal of both Dividend Capital Group LLC and Black Creek Capital, LLC, both of which he joined in February 2003. From November 1993 to March 1997, Mr. Wattles served as Co-Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of ProLogis (NYSE:PLD), and served as Chairman between March 1997 and May 1998. ProLogis is a publicly-traded industrial REIT. Mr. Wattles was a Managing Director of Security Capital Group Incorporated ("Security Capital Group") and was with Security Capital Group in various capacities including Chief Investment Officer from January 1991 to December 2002. Mr. Wattles is a director of Regency Centers Corporation (NYSE:REG) and chairs its Investment Committee. Mr. Wattles holds a Bachelor's degree and an MBA degree from Stanford University.
Evan H. Zucker, age 40, is the Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and a director of Dividend Capital Trust. Mr. Zucker is also a manager of both Dividend Capital Advisors and Dividend Capital Property Management. Mr. Zucker is a principal of Black Creek Capital, LLC, a Denver-based real estate investment firm which he co-founded in 1993. Mr. Zucker has been active in real estate acquisition, development and redevelopment activities since 1989 and as of March 31, 2005 with
66
Mr. Mulvihill and other affiliates has overseen directly or indirectly through affiliated entities, the acquisition, development, redevelopment, financing and sale of approximately 215 real estate projects with an aggregate value in excess of approximately $1.7 billion. In 1993 Mr. Zucker co-founded American Real Estate Investment Corp. (known as Keystone Property Trust, NYSE:KTR) which was an industrial, office and logistics REIT and was acquired by ProLogis (NYSE:PLD) in August 2004. Mr. Zucker served as the President and as a director of American Real Estate Investment Corp. from 1993 through 1997 and as a director of Keystone Property Trust from 1997 through 1999. Mr. Zucker graduated from Stanford University with a Bachelor's degree in Economics.
James R. Mulvihill, age 40, is the Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Dividend Capital Trust. Mr. Mulvihill is also a manager of both Dividend Capital Advisors and Dividend Capital Property Management. Mr. Mulvihill is a principal of Black Creek Capital, LLC, a Denver-based real estate investment firm which he co-founded in 1993. He is also a co-founder and Chairman of the Board of Corporate Properties of the Americas ("CPA"). CPA, a joint venture between an affiliate of Black Creek Capital and Equity International Properties, is a fully-integrated industrial real estate company that acquires, develops and manages industrial properties throughout Mexico. To date, CPA has developed and/or acquired approximately 9.6 million square feet of industrial buildings and developed industrial parks totaling approximately 660 acres. Mr. Mulvihill has been active in real estate acquisition, development and redevelopment activities since 1992 and as of March 31, 2005 with Mr. Zucker and other affiliates has overseen directly, or indirectly through affiliated entities, the acquisition, development, redevelopment, financing and sale of approximately 215 real estate projects with an aggregate value in excess of approximately $1.7 billion. In 1993 Mr. Mulvihill co-founded American Real Estate Investment Corp. (known as Keystone Property Trust, NYSE:KTR) which was an industrial, office and logistics REIT and was acquired by ProLogis (NYSE:PLD) in August 2004. Mr. Mulvihill served as its Chairman and as a director from 1993 through 1997 and as a director of Keystone Property Trust from 1997 through 2001. Prior to co-founding Black Creek Capital, Mr. Mulvihill served as Vice President of the Real Estate Banking and Investment Banking Groups of Manufacturer's Hanover and subsequently Chemical Bank, where his responsibilities included real estate syndication efforts, structured debt underwritings and leveraged buyout real estate financings. Mr. Mulvihill holds a Bachelor's degree from Stanford University in Political Science.
Tripp H. Hardin, age 44, is an independent director of Dividend Capital Trust. Mr. Hardin is a Vice President of Grubb & Ellis, and he has been active in real estate activities since 1984, focusing primarily on the sale and leasing of industrial, office and commercial properties. He has also been active in real estate investment and build-to-suit transactions. Mr. Hardin graduated from Stanford University with a Bachelor of Science Degree.
Robert F. Masten, age 55, is an independent director of Dividend Capital Trust. Mr. Masten has been active in commercial real estate transactions and title insurance matters since 1972. Mr. Masten is currently a Senior Vice President of Chicago Title Company, Denver, Colorado. Prior to joining Chicago Title Company, from 1993 to 2003, Mr. Masten had been a Senior Vice President of North American Title Company, Denver, Colorado, where he has provided title insurance for commercial real estate transactions. Prior to joining North American Title Company he was with Land Title Guaranty Company for 16 years. Before joining Land Title, Mr. Masten leased, managed and sold properties for 33 different syndicates for which Perry & Butler was the general partner. Mr. Masten graduated from the University of Colorado with a Bachelor's degree in Arts and Sciences.
John C. O'Keeffe, age 45, is an independent director of Dividend Capital Trust. Mr. O'Keeffe has been active in real estate construction activities since 1987. Since 1987 he has served as a project manager for Wm. Blanchard Co., Springfield, New Jersey, where he has been responsible for the construction of large healthcare projects. Mr. O'Keeffe graduated from Denison University with a Bachelor's Degree in English Literature.
67
Lars O. Soderberg, age 46, is an independent director of Dividend Capital Trust. From 1995 until July 2004, Mr. Soderberg was employed by Janus Funds. Janus Funds and certain of its affiliates have been defendants or respondents in various legal proceedings involving market-timing and other trading practices. Certain of these proceedings, including those commenced by the New York Attorney General, have been settled through the payment of significant fines, disgorgement and fee reductions by Janus. In his capacity as Vice President and Managing Director of Janus Institutional Services, he was responsible for the development, marketing and distribution of Janus' investment products to the institutional market place. Prior to joining Janus, Mr. Soderberg was employed by Fidelity Investments for approximately 14 years. Mr. Soderberg graduated from Denison University with a Bachelor of Arts Degree in History.
We pay each of our independent directors $5,000 per quarter plus $1,000 for each meeting attended. In addition, we have reserved 300,000 shares of common stock for future issuance upon the exercise of stock options granted to the independent directors pursuant to our Independent Director Option Plan (as discussed below). All directors receive reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of directors. If a director also is an officer of Dividend Capital Trust, we do not pay separate compensation for services rendered as a director.
Compensation of Executive Officers
We currently have no paid employees. Day-to-day management functions are performed by our advisor, and related affiliates.
Our executive officers are all employees of our advisor. We do not pay any of these individuals cash compensation for serving in their respective positions. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below for a discussion of fees paid to our advisor and other affiliated companies.
Our executive officers qualify for our Employee Option Plan. However, since the plan's inception through December 31, 2004, no option grants have been made to executive officers.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2004, the following directors served on our compensation committee: Robert F. Masten, James R. Mulvihill and Lars O. Soderberg. Mr. Mulvihill also served as our Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer.
Board Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
Our compensation committee may recommend awards of stock options to our executive officers under our Employee Option Plan.
Independent Director Option Plan
We have adopted an independent director stock option plan which we will use in an effort to attract and retain qualified independent directors (the "Independent Director Option Plan"). As of March 31, 2005, we have granted 15,000 non-qualified stock options to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock to each independent director for a total of 60,000 stock options, pursuant to the Independent Director Option Plan. We intend to issue options to purchase 5,000 shares to each independent director then in office on the date of each annual shareholder's meeting. Options may not be granted under the Independent Director Option Plan at any time when the grant would cause the
68
total number of options outstanding under the Independent Director Option Plan and the Employee Option Plan to collectively exceed 10% of our issued and outstanding shares.
A total of 300,000 shares are authorized and reserved for issuance under the Independent Director Option Plan. If the number of outstanding shares is changed into a different number or kind of shares or securities through a reorganization or merger in which Dividend Capital Trust is the surviving entity, or through a combination, recapitalization or otherwise, an appropriate adjustment will be made in the number and kind of shares that may be issued pursuant to exercise of the options. A corresponding adjustment to the exercise price of the options granted prior to any change will also be made. Any such adjustment, however, will not change the total payment, if any, applicable to the portion of the director options not exercised, but will change only the exercise price for each share. Options granted under the Independent Director Option Plan shall lapse on the first to occur of (1) the tenth anniversary of the date we grant them, (2) the removal of the independent director for cause, or (3) three months following the date the independent director ceases to be a director for any reason other than death or disability. Options may be exercised by payment of cash or through the delivery of fully-paid common stock. Options granted under the Independent Director Option Plan are generally exercisable in the case of death or disability for a period of one year after death or the disabling event. No option may be granted or exercised if such grant or exercise would jeopardize our status as a REIT under the Code or otherwise violate the ownership and transfer restrictions imposed under our articles of incorporation. The independent directors may not sell, pledge, assign or transfer their options other than by will or the laws of descent or distribution.
Upon the dissolution or liquidation of Dividend Capital Trust, upon our reorganization, merger or consolidation with one or more corporations as a result of which we are not the surviving corporation or upon sale of all or substantially all of our properties, the Independent Director Option Plan will terminate, and any outstanding options will terminate and be forfeited. The board of directors may provide in writing in connection with any such transaction for any or all of the following alternatives:
We have adopted an employee stock option plan (the "Employee Option Plan"). The Employee Option Plan is designed to enable Dividend Capital Trust, the Advisor and our property manager to obtain or retain the services of employees (not to include any person who is a sponsor or affiliate of Dividend Capital Trust) considered essential to our long-range success and the success of the Advisor and our property manager by offering such employees an opportunity to participate in the growth of Dividend Capital Trust through ownership of our common stock. The Employee Option Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee, which is authorized to grant "non-qualified" stock options (the "Employee Options") to selected employees of the Advisor and our property manager. All grants of Employee Options will be based upon the recommendation of the Advisor and subject to the absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee and applicable limitations of the Employee Option Plan. Employee Options may not be granted under the Employee Option Plan at any time when the grant would cause the total number of options outstanding under the Employee Option Plan and the Independent Director Option Plan to exceed 10% of our issued and outstanding shares. A total of
69
750,000 shares are authorized and reserved for issuance under the Employee Option Plan. The Compensation Committee shall set the term of the Employee Options in its discretion, which shall not exceed ten years. The Compensation Committee shall set the period during which the right to exercise an Employee Option vests. No Employee Option may be issued or exercised, however, if such issuance or exercise would jeopardize our status as a REIT under the Code or otherwise violate the ownership and transfer restrictions imposed under our articles of incorporation. In addition, no Employee Option may be sold, pledged, assigned or transferred by an employee in any manner other than by will or the laws of descent or distribution. As of March 31, 2005, 107,500 Employee Options had been granted to purchase 107,500 shares of common stock to employees of the Advisor and its affiliates.
In the event that the Compensation Committee determines that any cash distribution or other distribution, recapitalization, stock split, reorganization, merger, liquidation, dissolution, or sale, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, or other similar corporate transaction or event, affects the shares such that an adjustment is determined by the Compensation Committee to be appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under the Employee Option Plan or with respect to an Employee Option, then the Compensation Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable, adjust the number and kind of shares or the exercise price with respect to any option.
Limited Liability and Indemnification of Directors, Officers and Others
Our organizational documents limit the personal liability of our shareholders, directors and officers for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted under the current Maryland General Corporation Law. In addition, we have obtained directors and officers liability insurance. The Maryland General Corporation Law allows directors and officers to be indemnified against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and expenses actually incurred in a proceeding unless the following can be established:
Any indemnification or any agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of our assets and not from the shareholders. Indemnification could reduce the legal remedies available to us and the shareholders against the indemnified individuals, however.
This provision does not reduce the exposure of directors and officers to liability under federal or state securities laws, nor does it limit the shareholder's ability to obtain injunctive relief or other equitable remedies for a violation of a director's or an officer's duties to us or our shareholders, although the equitable remedies may not be an effective remedy in some circumstances.
In spite of the above provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law, our articles of incorporation provide that the directors, the Advisor and its affiliates will be indemnified by us for losses arising from our operation only if all of the following conditions are met:
70
We have agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the Advisor and its affiliates performing services for us from specific claims and liabilities arising out of the performance of their obligations under the Advisory Agreement. As a result, we and our shareholders may be entitled to a more limited right of action than we would otherwise have if these indemnification rights were not included in the Advisory Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of the Maryland General Corporation Law or our organizational documents, we may not indemnify or hold harmless the Advisor, its affiliates or any of their respective officers, directors, partners or employees in any manner that would be inconsistent with the REIT Guidelines adopted by the North American Securities Administrators Association.
The general effect to investors of any arrangement under which any of our controlling persons, directors or officers are insured or indemnified against liability is a potential reduction in distributions resulting from our payment of premiums associated with insurance. In addition, indemnification could reduce the legal remedies available to Dividend Capital Trust and our shareholders against the officers and directors.
The Securities and Exchange Commission takes the position that indemnification against liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 is against public policy and unenforceable. Indemnification of the directors, officers, the Advisor or its affiliates will not be allowed for liabilities arising from or out of a violation of state or federal securities laws, unless one or more of the following conditions are met:
Indemnification will be allowed for settlements and related expenses of lawsuits alleging securities laws violations and for expenses incurred in successfully defending any lawsuits, provided that a court either:
Certain of our officers and directors also actively participate in management of the Advisor. The Advisor has certain contractual responsibilities to Dividend Capital Trust and its shareholders pursuant
71
to the Advisory Agreement. The Advisor's address is Dividend Capital Advisors LLC, 518 17th Street, Suite 1700, Denver, CO 80202. The Advisor is collectively managed by the following individuals:
John A. Blumberg | James D. Cochran | Daryl H. Mechem | Mark W. Bowen | |||
James R. Mulvihill | Teresa L. Corral | Matthew T. Murphy | Bonnie B. Micus | |||
Thomas G. Wattles | Matthew R. Holberton | Michael J. Ruen | ||||
Evan H. Zucker | W. Jeffrey Jones | Gregory D. Skirving |
John A. Blumberg, age 46, is a manager of both Dividend Capital Advisors and Dividend Capital Property Management. Mr. Blumberg is a principal of both Dividend Capital Group LLC and Black Creek Capital, LLC, a Denver-based real estate investment firm which he co-founded in 1993. He is also a co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Mexico Retail Partners ("MRP"). MRP, a joint venture between an affiliate of Black Creek Capital and Equity International Properties, is a fully-integrated retail real estate company that acquires, develops and manages retail properties throughout Mexico. Mr. Blumberg has been active in real estate acquisition, development and redevelopment activities since 1993 and as of March 31, 2005 with Mr. Zucker and Mr. Mulvihill has overseen directly, or indirectly through affiliated entities, the acquisition, development, redevelopment, financing and sale of approximately 215 real estate projects with an aggregate value in excess of approximately $1.7 billion. Prior to co-founding Black Creek Capital, Mr. Blumberg was president of JJM Investments, which owned 113 shopping center properties in Texas. During the 12 years prior to joining JJM, Mr. Blumberg served in various positions with Manufacturer's Hanover Real Estate, Inc., Chemical Bank and Chemical Real Estate, Inc., most recently as President of Chemical Real Estate, Inc. and its predecessor company, Manufacturer's Hanover Real Estate, Inc. In this capacity Mr. Blumberg oversaw real estate investment banking, merchant banking and loan syndications. Mr. Blumberg holds a Bachelor's degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
James R. Mulvihill, age 40, is the Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Dividend Capital Trust. Mr. Mulvihill is also a manager of both Dividend Capital Advisors and Dividend Capital Property Management. Mr. Mulvihill is a principal of Black Creek Capital, LLC, a Denver-based real estate investment firm which he co-founded in 1993. He is also a co-founder and Chairman of the Board of Corporate Properties of the Americas ("CPA"). CPA, a joint venture between an affiliate of Black Creek Capital and Equity International Properties, is a fully-integrated industrial real estate company that acquires, develops and manages industrial properties throughout Mexico. To date, CPA has developed and/or acquired approximately 9.6 million square feet of industrial buildings and developed industrial parks totaling approximately 660 acres. Mr. Mulvihill has been active in real estate acquisition, development and redevelopment activities since 1992 and as of March 31, 2005 with Mr. Zucker and other affiliates has overseen directly, or indirectly through affiliated entities, the acquisition, development, redevelopment, financing and sale of approximately 215 real estate projects with an aggregate value in excess of approximately $1.7 billion. In 1993 Mr. Mulvihill co-founded American Real Estate Investment Corp. (known as Keystone Property Trust, NYSE:KTR) which was an industrial, office and logistics REIT and was acquired by ProLogis (NYSE:PLD) in August 2004. Mr. Mulvihill served as its Chairman and as a director from 1993 through 1997 and as a director of Keystone Property Trust from 1997 through 2001. Prior to co-founding Black Creek Capital, Mr. Mulvihill served as Vice President of the Real Estate Banking and Investment Banking Groups of Manufacturer's Hanover and subsequently Chemical Bank, where his responsibilities included real estate syndication efforts, structured debt underwritings and leveraged buyout real estate financings. Mr. Mulvihill holds a Bachelor's degree from Stanford University in Political Science.
Thomas G. Wattles, age 53, is the Chairman, Chief Investment Officer and a director of Dividend Capital Trust, a manager and Chief Investment Officer of Dividend Capital Advisors and a manager of Dividend Capital Property Management. Mr. Wattles is a principal of both Dividend Capital Group LLC and Black Creek Capital, LLC, both of which he joined in February 2003. From November 1993
72
to March 1997, Mr. Wattles served as Co-Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of ProLogis (NYSE:PLD), and served as Chairman between March 1997 and May 1998. Mr. Wattles was a Managing Director of Security Capital Group Incorporated ("Security Capital Group") and was with Security Capital Group in various capacities including Chief Investment Officer from January 1991 to December 2002. Mr. Wattles is a director of Regency Centers Corporation (NYSE:REG) and chairs its Investment Committee. Mr. Wattles holds a Bachelor's degree and an MBA degree from Stanford University.
Evan H. Zucker, age 40, is the Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and a director of Dividend Capital Trust. Mr. Zucker is also a manager of both Dividend Capital Advisors and Dividend Capital Property Management. Mr. Zucker is a principal of both Dividend Capital Group LLC and Black Creek Capital, LLC, a Denver-based real estate investment firm which he co-founded in 1993. Mr. Zucker has been active in real estate acquisition, development and redevelopment activities since 1989 and as of March 31, 2005 with Mr. Mulvihill and other affiliates has overseen directly or indirectly through affiliated entities, the acquisition, development, redevelopment, financing and sale of approximately 215 real estate projects with an aggregate value in excess of approximately $1.7 billion. In 1993 Mr. Zucker co-founded American Real Estate Investment Corp. (known as Keystone Property Trust, NYSE:KTR) which was an industrial, office and logistics REIT and was acquired by ProLogis (NYSE:PLD) in August 2004. Mr. Zucker served as the President and as a director of American Real Estate Investment Corp. from 1993 through 1997 and as a director of Keystone Property Trust from 1997 through 1999. Mr. Zucker graduated from Stanford University with a Bachelor's degree in Economics.
James D. Cochran, age 44, is a Managing Director of the Advisor, and is responsible for capital deployment. He has 20 years of experience in real estate. He most recently spent 10 years with ProLogis where he was a member of the Investment Committee and served as a member of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee for Macquarie ProLogis Trust, a publicly traded listed property trust in Australia. At ProLogis, Mr. Cochran held various positions including acquisition officer, market officer responsible for operations and development in Denver and Kansas City, head of the national acquisition and sales group, and capital markets where he raised private equity for joint ventures in North America. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Cochran worked at TCW Realty Advisors where he held acquisition and leasing positions with a focus on industrial product. Mr. Cochran also worked for Economics Research Associates where he performed market and financial feasibility studies for a variety of development projects. Mr. Cochran has a B.A. from the University of California, Davis and a M.B.A. from The Anderson School at UCLA.
Teresa L. Corral, age 41, is a Vice President and Senior Due Diligence Officer of the Advisor. Ms. Corral has been active in acquisition and development due diligence, underwriting, transaction closings for institutional real estate since 1987. Prior to joining the Advisor in May 2003, Ms. Corral served in various positions with Clayton, Williams, and Sherwood, Inc. and its affiliates, including CWS Communities Trust, a private REIT whose majority shareholder was affiliated with Security Capital Group and JPI, a privately owned multi-family real estate investment company. Ms. Corral holds a Bachelor's degree in business administration and economics from St. Mary's College of California.
Matthew R. Holberton, age 33, is the Vice President of Real Estate Finance of the Advisor and our property manager. Mr. Holberton has been active in investment banking, mergers and acquisitions, capital raising and structured financings for corporate clients since 1994. Prior to joining the Advisor in June 2002, Mr. Holberton served in various positions with Merrill Lynch, most recently as an investment banker in the Real Estate Investment Banking Group. Mr. Holberton also served as an investment banker in the Structured Finance Group of Merrill Lynch. Prior to joining Merrill Lynch's Structured Finance Group, Mr. Holberton was an investment banker in the Asset Finance Group of Citicorp Securities, Inc. Mr. Holberton holds a Bachelor's degree from Bucknell University and an MBA from Columbia University's Graduate School of Business.
73
W. Jeffrey Jones, age 34, is a Vice President and Due Diligence officer of the Advisor. Prior to joining the Advisor in April 2004, Mr. Jones served as a Vice President in the due diligence and acquisitions group at ProLogis, where he was responsible for financial feasibility analysis and risk assessment of industrial real estate transactions within the U.S. and Mexico. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Jones served as a revenue accountant for Associated Natural Gas, Inc. Mr. Jones holds a B.S. in accounting and business administration from the University of Kansas.
Daryl H. Mechem, CCIM, age 44, is a Senior Vice President of the Advisor, and is responsible for property operations. Prior to joining us, Mr. Mechem was most recently a Senior Vice President and Regional Director for Prologis where he had overall responsibilities for the day-to-day real estate operations in the Mid-Atlantic region which encompassed over 43 million square feet in 8 markets (Chicago, Cincinnati, Columbus, Indianapolis, Louisville, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and St. Louis). Mr. Mechem joined Prologis in May 1995 as a Marketing Representative in the Houston market, was promoted to Vice President Market Officer in November of 1999, First Vice President in 2001 and Senior Vice President in January of 2003.
Matthew T. Murphy, age 41, is the Vice President of Finance and Controller of the Advisor and our property manager. Mr. Murphy has been active in the accounting functions in connection with real estate companies since 1989. Prior to joining the Advisor in May 2003, Mr. Murphy was a Vice President and Controller of Pritzker Residential, LLC, a privately-owned, fully-integrated multi-family real estate investment company. Prior to joining Pritzker, Mr. Murphy served in various positions with Security Capital Group and its affiliates, including Archstone-Smith Trust and ProLogis. Prior to joining Security Capital Group, Mr. Murphy was a staff accountant with Coopers and Lybrand. Mr. Murphy holds a Bachelor's degree in Accounting from Colorado State University.
Michael J. Ruen, age 39, is a Senior Vice President and a Regional Director of Acquisitions of the Advisor. He has 15 years of experience in real estate and most recently spent 9 years with ProLogis in various positions. At ProLogis, Mr. Ruen was a First Vice President and Market Officer with responsibility over development, acquisition and portfolio operations for the state of Tennessee. Prior to that, he had similar responsibilities for Denver, Birmingham and Chattanooga after managing the leasing and marketing activities for Atlanta. Prior to joining ProLogis, Mr. Ruen was with CB Richard Ellis-Atlanta and responsible for various institutional account activities including general brokerage. Mr. Ruen has a BS from the University of Alabama and an MBA from Georgia State University.
Gregory D. Skirving, age 58, is a Vice President and a Regional Director of Acquisitions of the Advisor, and is responsible for identifying and advising on investment opportunities in the central United States, including Texas. He has been directly involved in industrial real estate for over 25 years. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Skirving was Vice President and Global Services Officer for ProLogis (NYSE:PLD). Mr. Skirving served as Senior Vice President and Global Services Officer for Meridian Industrial Trust from 1996 to 1998, when Meridian was acquired by ProLogis. From 1990 to 1996, Mr. Skirving was Executive Vice President and Partner with Trammell Crow Corporate Services, where he led TCC's entry into their corporate real estate outsourcing services platform. From 1982 to 1990, Mr. Skirving was Partner and Chief Operating Officer for Reynolds Properties, a Denver based developer of suburban office and industrial buildings, and planned business parks. Mr. Skirving graduated from Arizona State University with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Economics.
Mark W. Bowen, age 40, is a Vice President and Senior Due Diligence Officer of the Advisor. Mr. Bowen has been active in real estate and finance for over 18 years, in both the private and institutional sectors. He most recently spent three years with the Laramar Group, a privately held multifamily company, where he was a partner and served as a member on the investment committee as well as directed the acquisitions and capital raising activities in the western half of the U.S. Prior to joining Laramar, Mr. Bowen spent 15 years with General Electric Corporation in various positions, the most recent of which was as the West Director of Joint Ventures. Other positions held at General
74
Electric included, Regional Manager of structured debt and capital markets as well as equity, Manager of the Denver District office, which he opened, National Portfolio Manager, where he managed approximately $3.2 billion in assets, Investment Manager and Credit Officer. Mr. Bowen holds a Bachelor's degree in Management and Finance from Colorado State University.
Bonnie B. Micus, CPM, CCIM, age 58, is a Vice President and Director of Property Management for the Advisor and is responsible for the oversight of all property management activities and third party property management companies. Ms. Micus has over 20 years of real estate experience in property management and leasing in various property types, including, office, industrial, retail and multi-family. Prior to joining the Advisor, Ms. Micus worked for a national pension fund advisor, Lowe Enterprises Realty Group, where she oversaw the management operations for the Rocky Mountain region. Prior to joining Lowe Enterprises Realty Group, Ms. Micus worked for MONY's management subsidiary ARES as Vice President Director of Property Management. Ms. Micus received her Bachelor's degree from the University of New York at Albany, and holds the CPM and CCIM designations from the Institute of Real Estate Management.
Many of the services to be performed by the Advisor in managing our day-to-day activities are summarized below. This summary is provided to illustrate the material functions which the Advisor performs for us and it is not intended to include all of the services which may be provided to us by third parties. Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor undertakes to use its best efforts to present to us investment opportunities consistent with our investment policies and objectives as adopted by the board of directors. In its performance of this undertaking, the Advisor, either directly or indirectly by engaging an affiliate other than our property manager, shall, subject to the authority of the board:
The term of the current Advisory Agreement ends on February 25, 2005 and may be renewed by our board of directors for an unlimited number of successive one-year periods. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated:
75
"Cause" is defined in the Advisory Agreement to mean fraud, criminal conduct, willful misconduct or willful or negligent breach of fiduciary duty by the Advisor or a breach of the Advisory Agreement by the Advisor.
The Advisor and its affiliates have and will continue to engage in other business ventures and, as a result, their resources will not be dedicated exclusively to our business. However, pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor must devote sufficient resources to our business operations to discharge its obligations. The Advisor may assign the Advisory Agreement to an affiliate other than our property manager upon approval of a majority of our independent directors. The Advisor may not make any acquisition or development of property or financing of such acquisition on our behalf without the prior approval of a majority of our independent directors or, in certain instances, of our board's investment committee which is composed of a majority of independent directors. The actual terms and conditions of transactions involving investments in properties shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Advisor, subject at all times to such board approval.
We will reimburse the Advisor for all of the costs it incurs in connection with the services it provides to us, including, but not limited to:
The Advisor must reimburse us at least quarterly for reimbursements paid to the Advisor in any four consecutive fiscal quarters to the extent that such reimbursements cause operating expenses to exceed the greater of (1) 2% of our average invested assets, which generally consists of the average book value of our real estate properties before reserves for depreciation, or (2) 25% of our net income, which is defined as our total revenues less total expenses for any given period excluding reserves for depreciation and bad debt. Such operating expenses do not include amounts payable out of capital contributions which may be capitalized for tax and/or accounting purposes such as the acquisition and advisory fees payable to the Advisor. To the extent that operating expenses payable or reimbursable by us exceed this limit and the independent directors determine that the excess expenses were justified based on unusual and nonrecurring factors which they deem sufficient, the Advisor may be reimbursed in future years for the full amount of the excess expenses, or any portion thereof, but only to the extent the reimbursement would not cause our operating expenses to exceed the limitation in any year. Within 60 days after the end of any of our fiscal quarters for which total operating expenses for the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended exceed the limitation, there shall be sent to the shareholders a written disclosure, together with an explanation of the factors the independent directors considered in arriving at the conclusion that the excess expenses were justified.
The Advisor and its affiliates will be paid fees in connection with services provided to us. (See "ManagementManagement Compensation"). In the event the Advisory Agreement is terminated, the
76
Advisor will be paid all accrued and unpaid fees and expense reimbursements, and any subordinated fees earned prior to the termination. We will not reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates for services for which the Advisor or its affiliates are entitled to compensation in the form of a separate fee.
Holdings of Common Stock and Partnership Units
The following table sets forth information as of May 31, 2005 regarding the number and percentage of our common shares beneficially owned by: (i) each director; (ii) each executive officer; (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group; and (iv) any person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the shares issued and outstanding.
Name of Beneficial Owner |
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Percent of Class(2) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Thomas G. Wattles (Chairman, Chief Investment Officer and Director) | 61,408 | (3) | * | |
Evan H. Zucker (Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Director) |
30,577 |
(4) |
* |
|
James R. Mulvihill (Chief Financial Officer and Director) |
30,352 |
(5) |
* |
|
Trip H. Hardin (Director) |
9,102 |
(6) |
* |
|
Robert F. Masten (Director) |
6,207 |
(7) |
* |
|
John C. O'Keeffe (Director) |
7,035 |
(8) |
* |
|
Lars O. Soderberg (Director) |
11,176 |
(9) |
* |
|
James D. Cochran (Managing Director) |
5,176 |
* |
||
Daryl H. Mechem (Senior Vice President) |
2,588 |
* |
||
Matthew T. Murphy (Vice President) |
1,035 |
* |
||
All directors and officers as a group |
124,656 |
(10) |
* |
77
The Advisor currently owns 20,000 limited partnership units of our operating partnership, for which it contributed $200,000. The Advisor may not sell any of these units during the period it serves as the Advisor. Dividend Capital Trust, which serves as the general partner of our operating partnership, currently owns 200 general partnership units for which it contributed $2,000. Dividend Capital Trust, as of March 31, 2005, owned approximately 81.3 million limited partnership units or approximately 99.9% of our operating partnership. Dividend Capital Advisors Group LLC, the parent of the Advisor, owns all of the 10,000 Special Units in our operating partnership currently outstanding, for which it contributed $1,000. Dividend Capital Advisors Group LLC is indirectly majority owned and/or controlled by Messrs. Blumberg, Florence, Mulvihill, Wattles and Zucker and their affiliates. An affiliate of the Advisor also owns 200 shares of Dividend Capital Trust, which it acquired upon the initial formation of Dividend Capital Trust. The resale of any shares by our affiliates is subject to the provisions of Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, which rule limits the number of shares that may be sold at any one time and the manner of such resale.
Although the Advisor and its affiliates generally are not prohibited from acquiring our common stock, the Advisor has no options or warrants to acquire shares and has no current plans to acquire shares. The affiliate of the Advisor which owns outstanding shares has agreed to abstain from voting any shares it now owns or hereafter acquires in any vote for the election of directors or any vote regarding the approval or termination of any contract with the Advisor or any of its affiliates.
In January 2005, in connection with our third public offering, members of our board of directors, managers of our advisor, our advisor's senior management team and/or each of their respective affiliates collectively purchased in excess of $1.0 million of our common stock.
78
Property Manager
As of March 31, 2005, all of our properties were managed by third party property managers. However, in the future some or all of our properties may be managed and leased by Dividend Capital Management Company LLC, our property manager. Our property manager is an affiliate of the Advisor. Our property manager is currently managed and directed by John A. Blumberg, James R. Mulvihill, Thomas G. Wattles and Evan H. Zucker. (See the "Conflicts of Interest" section of this prospectus). The backgrounds of Messrs. Blumberg, Mulvihill, Wattles and Zucker are described above in the "ManagementThe Advisor" section of this prospectus.
Our property manager was organized in April 2002 to provide leasing and management services. For properties managed by our property manager we will pay our property manager property management and leasing fees not exceeding the lesser of: (A) 3.0% of gross revenues or (B) 0.6% of the net asset value of the properties (excluding vacant properties) managed, calculated on an annual basis. For purposes of this calculation, net asset value shall be defined as (1) the aggregate of the fair market value of all properties managed by our property manager (excluding vacant properties), minus (2) our aggregate outstanding debt associated with the managed properties (excluding debts having maturities of one year or less). In addition, we may pay our property manager a separate fee for the one-time initial rent-up or leasing-up of newly constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm's length transactions by others rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties as determined by a survey of brokers and agents in such area (which may in certain markets be equal to the first month's rent).
In the event our property manager assists a customer with tenant improvements, a separate fee may be charged to the customer and paid by the customer. This fee will not exceed 5% of the cost of the tenant improvements. Our property manager will only provide these services if the provision of the services does not cause any of our income from the applicable property to be treated as other than rents from real property for purposes of the applicable REIT requirements described in the "Federal Income Tax Considerations" section of this prospectus.
Our property manager will derive all of its income from the property management and leasing services it performs for us. Our property manager may hire, direct and establish policies for employees who will have direct responsibility for the operations of each property managed, which may include but not be limited to on-site managers and building and maintenance personnel. Certain employees of our property manager may be employed on a part-time basis and may also be employed by the Advisor, Dealer Manager or certain companies affiliated with them. Our property manager may also direct the purchase of equipment and supplies and will supervise all maintenance activity. The management fees to be paid to our property manager will cover, without additional expense to us, all of our property manager's general overhead costs.
The principal office of our property manager is located at 518 17th Street, Suite 1700, Denver, Colorado 80202. Generally, if our property manager is not engaged to manage our properties, we will employ unaffiliated third party property managers to perform the day-to-day property management tasks.
Dealer Manager
Dividend Capital Securities LLC, our dealer manager, is a member firm of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("NASD"). The Dealer Manager was organized in December 2001 for the purpose of participating in and facilitating the distribution of our common stock. Dividend Capital Securities acted as our dealer manager for our previous offerings and acts as the dealer manager for the offering by our operating partnership of its limited partnership units. Prior
79
to these offerings, Dividend Capital Securities had not participated in any private or public securities transactions.
The Dealer Manager will provide certain sales, promotional and marketing services to Dividend Capital Trust in connection with the distribution of the shares offered pursuant to this prospectus. It may, but does not currently expect to, sell a limited number of shares at the retail level. (See "Plan of Distribution" and "ManagementManagement Compensation").
The Dealer Manager is an affiliate of both the Advisor and our property manager (See "Conflicts of Interest"). The Dealer Manager is collectively managed by the following individuals:
Thomas I. Florence | Mark D. Quam | John Norris | ||
Francis P. Gaffney | Charles Murray | |||
Thomas E. Pellowe | Phillip Perrone |
Thomas I. Florence, age 42, is a manager of the Dealer Manager and a principal of Dividend Capital Group LLC, both of which he joined in June of 2003. Mr. Florence has over 18 years of experience in the financial services industry. Prior to joining the Dealer Manager he was a Managing Director at Morningstar Inc. with oversight responsibility of the 800 person company operating in 13 countries. In addition, he founded and was President of Morningstar Investment Services, an investment advisory firm managing portfolios for the clients of investment advisors. Prior to Morningstar, Mr. Florence was a Senior Vice President at Pilgrim Baxter and Associates responsible for managing a distribution organization with over $25 billion in assets under management. Prior to Pilgrim Baxter, he held management positions at Fidelity Investments. Mr. Florence holds a Bachelor's degree from the Pennsylvania State University and is a graduate of Northwestern University's Kellogg Management Institute.
Charles Murray, age 42, is the President of the Dealer Manager. Mr. Murray has over 18 years of experience in the financial services industry. Prior to joining the Dealer Manager, Mr. Murray was a Senior Managing Director for Spencer Trask Ventures, Inc., where he was responsible for their sales and marketing efforts. Prior to Spencer Trask Ventures, Mr. Murray held various senior management positions with Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. from June 1986 through October 2001. Most recently, Mr. Murray was a Senior Vice President and corporate spokesperson responsible for representing the company at national and regional sales conferences and developing presentations for all sales and marketing campaigns. From January 1998 until December 2000, Mr. Murray was a Senior Vice President and a Director of Sales with responsibility for the company's national and regional brokerage distribution channel. From March 1996 until December 1997, he served as a Senior Vice President and as Eastern Division Sales Manager, in which capacity he was responsible for 50% of the firm's gross sales volume and managed a team of 20 regional sales managers. From June 1986 until September 1990, he held various senior management positions, in which he developed business strategies for increasing sales. Mr. Murray holds a Bachelor's degree in Economics from Saint Peter's College, Jersey City, New Jersey.
Francis P. Gaffney, age 48, is Senior Vice President and Director of Operations of the Dealer Manager. Prior to joining the Dealer Manager, Mr. Gaffney worked at Founders Asset Management as Senior Vice President of Operations where he was responsible for a variety of functions including portfolio accounting, information technology, its transfer agency and shareholder services. Mr. Gaffney has been active in the financial services industry since 1992. Mr. Gaffney holds a MBA and a BA in psychology from the State University of New York at Albany.
Thomas E. Pellowe, age 36, is Senior Vice President and Director of National Accounts of the Dealer Manager. Mr. Pellowe has been active in the financial services industry since 1990. Prior to joining the Dealer Manager, Mr. Pellowe served in various positions with INVESCO Funds Group, most recently as Vice President, National Accounts Manager, where he was responsible for all
80
distribution and strategic relationships in the broker-dealer intermediary marketplace. Mr. Pellowe holds a Bachelor's degree in Economics and Finance from Bentley College, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Mark D. Quam, age 35, is Senior Vice President of the Dealer Manager. Prior to joining the Dealer Manager, Mr. Quam served as Director of Capital Markets for Black Creek Capital. Mr. Quam has also been active in real estate development as a Director of Construction and Project Management for CB Richard Ellis. Additionally, Mr. Quam participated in the development of several master planned residential communities while working with the Writer Corporation as Project Manager. Combined, Mr. Quam participated in the oversight of over 2 million square feet of construction and development. Previously Mr. Quam was an Investment Advisor for Dain Bosworth (now RBC Dain Rauscher). Mr. Quam holds an MBA in Real Estate and Construction from the University of Denver and a B.A. in Finance from the University of Arizona.
Phillip Perrone, age 46, is the Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Dealer Manager. Prior to joining our dealer manager, Mr. Perrone spent six years with Oppenheimer Funds, Inc., where he served as a Compliance Manager, ensuring adherence to a comprehensive set of federal, state and company-enforced rules and regulations. Prior to that, he spent eight years conducting audits of brokerage firms across six states and conducting special investigations for the National Association of Securities Dealers. His career began more than 20 years ago as Assistant Vice President and Operations Manager for Kidder, Peabody & Company, Inc. Mr. Perrone holds a Bachelor's degree in business administration/finance from Regis University, Denver, Colorado.
John Norris, age 43, is the Senior Vice President and National Sales Manager of the Dealer Manager. Prior to joining the Dealer Manager, Mr. Norris served as managing director and national sales manager for Scudder Investments, where he directed the field sales and national account activities through the independent broker/dealer channel. Mr. Norris has over 21 years of experience in the financial services industry, and holds a Bachelor's degree and an MBA from Southern Illinois University in Carbondale, Illinois.
Management Decisions of the Advisor
John A. Blumberg, James R. Mulvihill, Thomas G. Wattles and Evan H. Zucker will have control and primary responsibility for the management decisions of the Advisor and certain of its affiliates, including the selection of investment properties to be recommended to our board of directors, the negotiations for these investments, and the property management and leasing of these properties. The Advisor will attempt to invest in commercial real estate properties, consisting primarily of high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties net leased to creditworthy corporate customers.
Based on a price of $10.50 per share, the sections below summarize and disclose all of the compensation and fees, including reimbursement of expenses, to be paid by Dividend Capital Trust to our advisor, our property manager and the dealer manager. Our advisor and our property manager are controlled collectively by Messrs. Blumberg, Mulvihill, Wattles and Zucker and the Dealer Manager is controlled collectively by Messrs. Florence, Quam, Perrone and Murray. The estimated maximum dollar amount of each fee assumes the sale of 72,770,273 shares to the public and the sale of 23,650,339 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. The sections below also summarize the amounts distributable with respect to the Special Units in the Partnership that have been issued to Dividend Capital Advisors Group LLC, the parent of the Advisor.
81
Organizational and Offering Stage
Sales Commissions
Dealer Manager Fee
Distribution Reinvestment Plan Servicing Fee
Reimbursement of Organization and Offering Expenses
Acquisition and Development Stage
Acquisition Fees
82
Asset Management Fee
Property Management and Leasing Fee
Real Estate Commissions
83
Footnote to Management Compensation:
Special Units in the Partnership
84
replaced or removed, the redemption price will be the amount that would have been distributed with respect to the Special Units in accordance with the preceding paragraph if the Partnership sold all of its assets for their then fair market values (as determined by an appraisal of the Partnership's investments in the case of a termination or non-renewal of the Advisory Agreement), paid all of its liabilities and distributed any remaining amount to partners in liquidation of our operating partnership.
Except as described above, the Special Units shall not be entitled to receive any redemption or similar payment from Dividend Capital Trust or the Partnership.
Dividend Capital Trust may not reimburse any entity for operating expenses that would cause operating expenses to be in excess of the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for the year. Operating Expenses for these purposes include aggregate expenses of every character paid or incurred by Dividend Capital Trust other than the expenses of raising capital (such as organizational and offering expenses), interest payments, taxes, non-cash expenditures such as depreciation and amortization, property acquisition fees and property acquisition expenses.
As of the date of this prospectus, there is no contractual agreement between us and the Advisor with respect to the advisory fee structure or other arrangements in the event the shares become listed on a national securities exchange or traded on an over-the-counter market. The independent directors of our board of directors are considering entering into an agreement with the Advisor whereby in the event our common stock is approved for listing, we would have the ability to acquire the Advisor for a price to be based on a fixed valuation formula. Any such contract would have to be approved by our board of directors, including a majority of the independent directors. We cannot assure you that any such contract will be entered into or what the terms of such contract will be.
In the event the board of directors does not enter into such a contract, if at any time the shares become listed on a national securities exchange or traded on an over-the-counter market, we will negotiate in good faith with the Advisor a fee structure appropriate for an entity with a perpetual life. Our articles of incorporation requires that a majority of the independent directors approve any new fee structure that is negotiated with the Advisor. In negotiating a new fee structure, the independent directors shall consider all of the factors they deem relevant, including but not limited to:
The board, including a majority of the independent directors, may not approve a new fee structure that is, in its judgment, more favorable to the Advisor than the current fee structure.
The Advisor and its affiliates will also be reimbursed only for the actual cost of goods, services and materials used for or by Dividend Capital Trust. The Advisor may be reimbursed for the administrative
85
services necessary to the prudent operation of Dividend Capital Trust provided that the reimbursement shall be at the lower of the Advisor's actual cost or the amount Dividend Capital Trust would be required to pay to independent parties for comparable administrative services in the same geographic location. We will not reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates for services for which they are entitled to compensation by way of a separate fee.
Since the Advisor and its affiliates are entitled to different levels of compensation for undertaking different transactions on behalf of Dividend Capital Trust (such as the property management fees for operating the properties and the acquisition and advisory fees), the Advisor has the ability to affect the nature of the compensation it receives by undertaking different transactions. However, the Advisor is obligated to exercise good faith and integrity in all its dealings with respect to our affairs pursuant to the Advisory Agreement. (See "ManagementThe Advisory Agreement"). Because these fees or expenses are payable only with respect to certain transactions or services, they may not be recovered by the Advisor or its affiliates by reclassifying them under a different category.
86
We are subject to various conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with the Advisor and its affiliates, including conflicts related to the compensation arrangements between the Advisor and its affiliates and Dividend Capital Trust (see "ManagementManagement Compensation") and conflicts related to the interests in the Partnership held by the Advisor and its parent. (See "The Partnership Agreement"). The independent directors have an obligation to function on our behalf in all situations in which a conflict of interest may arise and will have a fiduciary obligation to act on behalf of the shareholders. These conflicts include, but are not limited to, the following:
Interests in Other Real Estate Programs
Other than its activities related to its status as Advisor to Dividend Capital Trust, the Advisor presently has no interest in other real estate programs. Certain affiliates of the Advisor are presently, and plan in the future to continue to be, involved with real estate programs and activities which are unrelated to Dividend Capital Trust. Present activities of these affiliates generally include investments in the ownership, acquisition, development and management of industrial and retail properties located in various markets in Mexico, the ownership, acquisition, development and management of multifamily, condominium, golf and residential community properties primarily located in the Denver, Colorado and New York metropolitan areas and the ownership and management of various other real estate assets primarily located in Denver, Colorado. Affiliates of the Advisor are not presently involved in any real estate activities related to the acquisition, development or management of industrial properties located in the United States.
Other Activities of the Advisor and its Affiliates
Certain affiliates of the Advisor are presently, and plan in the future to continue to be, involved in non-real estate activities. These activities presently include the ownership, management and operation of CapEx, LP, a $60 million private equity and mezzanine debt fund which invests in and provides capital to non-real estate operating companies, as well as the direct ownership, management and operation of various other non-real estate operating companies.
Conflicts of interest will exist to the extent that we may acquire properties in the same geographic areas where properties owned by other programs affiliated with the Advisor are located. In such a case, a conflict could arise in the leasing of properties in the event that Dividend Capital Trust and a related entity were to compete for the same customers in negotiating leases, or a conflict could arise in connection with the resale of properties in the event that Dividend Capital Trust and a related entity were to attempt to sell similar properties at the same time. (See "Risk FactorsInvestment Risks"). Conflicts of interest may also exist at such time as Dividend Capital Trust or our affiliates managing property on our behalf seek to employ developers, contractors or building managers. The Advisor will seek to reduce conflicts relating to the employment of developers, contractors or building managers by making prospective employees aware of all such properties seeking to employ such persons. In addition, the Advisor will seek to reduce conflicts which may arise with respect to properties available for sale or rent by making prospective purchasers or customers aware of all such properties. However, these conflicts cannot be fully avoided in that the Advisor may establish differing compensation arrangements for employees at different properties or differing terms for re-sales or leasing of the various properties.
The following chart shows the ownership structure of the various Dividend Capital entities that are affiliated with the Advisor. Dividend Capital Securities Group LLLP, Dividend Capital Management Group LLC and Dividend Capital Advisors Group LLC are presently each majority owned by one or more of the following: John Blumberg, Thomas Florence, James Mulvihill, Mark Quam, Thomas Wattles, Evan Zucker and/or their affiliates. Dividend Capital Advisors Group LLC has issued and may
87
further issue, and Dividend Capital Management Group LLC has not issued as of the date of this prospectus but may in the future issue, equity interests or derivatives thereof to certain of their employees or other unaffiliated individuals, consultants or other parties. However, none of such transactions are expected to result in a change in control of these entities.
Since the Dealer Manager is an affiliate of the Advisor, we will not have the benefit of an independent due diligence review and investigation of the type normally performed by an unaffiliated, independent underwriter in connection with the offering of securities. (See "Plan of Distribution").
Our property manager is affiliated with the Advisor and a number of the members and managers of the Advisor and our property manager may overlap. As a result, we might not always have the benefit of independent property management to the same extent as if the Advisor and our property manager were unaffiliated and did not share any employees or managers. (See "ManagementAffiliated Companies").
88
Lack of Separate Representation
Clifford Chance US LLP serves as securities counsel to Dividend Capital Trust, the Advisor, the Dealer Manager and our property manager in connection with this offering and may continue to do so in the future. Clifford Chance US LLP also serves as counsel to certain affiliates of the Advisor in matters unrelated to this offering. Moye Giles LLP serves as special securities counsel to Dividend Capital Trust, the Advisor and the Dealer Manager in connection with this offering and may continue to do so in the future. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP serves as special tax counsel to Dividend Capital Trust. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP has also served as counsel to certain affiliates of the Advisor in matters unrelated to this offering. There is a possibility that in the future the interests of the various parties may become adverse. In the event that a dispute were to arise between Dividend Capital Trust and the Advisor, the Dealer Manager, our property manager or any of their affiliates, separate counsel for such parties would be retained as and when appropriate.
Joint Ventures with Affiliates of the Advisor
Subject to approval by our board of directors and the separate approval of our independent directors, we may enter into joint ventures or other arrangements with third parties, including affiliates of the Advisor, to acquire, develop and own properties. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaJoint Venture Investments"). The Advisor and its affiliates may have conflicts of interest in determining which of such entities should enter into any particular joint venture agreement. The venture partner may have economic or business interests or goals which are or which may become inconsistent with our business interests or goals. In addition, should any such joint venture be consummated, the Advisor may face a conflict in structuring the terms of the relationship between our interests and the interest of the affiliated venture partner and in managing the joint venture. Since the Advisor will make investment decisions on behalf of Dividend Capital Trust, agreements and transactions between the Advisor's affiliates and us as venture partners with respect to any such joint venture will not have the benefit of arm's length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated parties. (See "Risk FactorsInvestment Risks").
Fees and Other Compensation to the Advisor
A transaction involving the purchase and sale of properties may result in the receipt of commissions, fees and other compensation by the Advisor and its affiliates and partnership distributions to the Advisor and its affiliates, including acquisition and advisory fees, the dealer manager fee, property management and leasing fees, real estate brokerage commissions, and participation in non-liquidating net sale proceeds. However, certain fees and distributions (but not expense reimbursements) payable to the Advisor and its affiliates relating to the sale of properties are subordinated to the return to the shareholders or partners of our operating partnership of their capital contributions plus cumulative non-compounded annual returns on such capital. Subject to oversight by the board of directors, the Advisor has considerable discretion with respect to all decisions relating to the terms and timing of all transactions. Therefore, the Advisor may have conflicts of interest concerning certain actions taken on our behalf, particularly due to the fact that such fees and other amounts will generally be payable to the Advisor and its affiliates regardless of the quality of the properties acquired or the services provided to Dividend Capital Trust. (See "ManagementManagement Compensation" and "The Partnership Agreement").
Every transaction we enter into with the Advisor or its affiliates is subject to an inherent conflict of interest. The board may encounter conflicts of interest in enforcing our rights against any affiliate in the event of a default by or disagreement with an affiliate or in invoking powers, rights or options pursuant to any agreement between us and any affiliate. A majority of the independent directors who are otherwise disinterested in the transaction must approve each transaction between us and the Advisor or any of its affiliates as being fair and reasonable to us and on terms and conditions no less favorable to us than those available from unaffiliated third parties.
89
Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures
In order to reduce or eliminate certain potential conflicts of interest, our articles of incorporation contain a number of restrictions relating to (1) transactions we enter into with the Advisor and its affiliates, (2) certain future offerings, and (3) allocation of properties among affiliated entities. These restrictions include, among others, the following:
If a subsequent development, such as a delay in the closing of a property or a delay in the construction of a property, causes any such investment, in the opinion of our board of directors and the Advisor, to be more appropriate for a program other than the program that committed to make the investment, the Advisor may determine that another program affiliated with the Advisor or its affiliates may make the investment. Our board of directors has a duty to ensure that the method used by the Advisor for the allocation of the acquisition of properties by two or more affiliated programs seeking to acquire similar types of properties shall be reasonable.
90
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Certain of our officers and directors also actively participate in the management of our advisor. Our advisor has certain contractual responsibilities to us and our shareholders pursuant to the Advisory Agreement.
Our advisor is indirectly majority owned and/or controlled by John A. Blumberg, Thomas I. Florence, James R. Mulvihill, Thomas G. Wattles and Evan H. Zucker and their affiliates. Collectively, Messrs. Blumberg, Florence, Mulvihill, Wattles and Zucker have primary responsibility for the management decisions of our advisor and certain of its affiliates, including the selection of investment properties to be recommended to our board of directors, the negotiations for these investments and the property management and leasing of these properties. Our advisor will attempt to invest in commercial real estate properties, consisting primarily of high-quality industrial buildings net leased to creditworthy corporate tenants.
Our advisor and its affiliates are paid fees in connection with services provided to us. In the event the Advisory Agreement is terminated, our advisor will be paid all accrued and unpaid fees and expense reimbursements, and any subordinated fees earned prior to the termination. We will not reimburse our advisor or its affiliates for services for which our advisor or its affiliates are entitled to compensation in the form of a separate fee.
We pay certain acquisition and asset management fees to our advisor. The amount of such acquisition fees was previously equal to 3% of the aggregate purchase price of all properties we acquired up to a cumulative purchase price of $170 million. In March 2004, we reached the cumulative threshold of $170 million in properties and all subsequent acquisitions have been and will continue to be subject to a reduced acquisition fee of 1.0%. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, our advisor earned approximately $6.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively, for acquisition fees which are accounted for as part of the basis of the acquired properties.
We pay our advisor an asset management fee equal to 0.75% per annum of the total undepreciated cost of the properties we owned in excess of $170 million. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, we incurred asset management fees of $1.5 million that are included in general and administrative expenses on our consolidated statement of operations. We did not incur asset management fees for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003.
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, our advisor is obligated to advance all of our organization and offering costs, subject to its right to be reimbursed for such costs by us in an amount up to 2% of the aggregate gross offering proceeds raised. Such organization and offering costs include but are not limited to actual legal, accounting, printing and other expenses attributable to organizing Dividend Capital Trust, preparing the SEC registration statement, qualification of the shares for sale in the states and filing fees incurred by our advisor, as well as reimbursements for marketing, salaries and direct expenses of its employees while engaged in registering and marketing the shares, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee (see below). During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, our advisor incurred approximately $8.3, $7.7, and $3.4 million, of organization and offering costs, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we reimbursed our advisor approximately $10.9 and $3.3 million, respectively. There were no reimbursements made during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2004, the net un-reimbursed amount of organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor, since inception (April 12, 2002), was approximately $5.2 million. If we are not successful in raising additional amounts of equity proceeds, no additional amounts will be payable by us to our advisor for reimbursement of organization and offering costs.
91
Our advisor is obligated to pay all of the offering and marketing related costs associated with our operating partnership's private placement (the private placement is described in more detail under "Investment Objectives and CriteriaOur Operating Partnership's Private Placement"). However, our operating partnership is obligated to pay our advisor a non-accountable expense allowance which equals 2% of the gross equity proceeds raised through our operating partnership's private placement. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, our operating partnership incurred approximately $521,000 and $54,000, respectively, payable to our advisor for such expense allowance. There was no such expense allowance incurred by our operating partnership during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
In accordance with the Advisory Agreement we are obligated, subject to certain limitations, to reimburse our advisor for certain other expenses incurred on our behalf for providing services contemplated in the Advisory Agreement, provided that our advisor does not receive a specific fee for the activities which generate the expenses to be reimbursed. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, we have reimbursed $326,659, $96,384 and $11,394 of such expenses.
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, we owed our advisor approximately $576,000 and $87,000, respectively. The total compensation paid to our advisor during 2004 and 2003, exclusive of reimbursements, was approximately $8.0 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
Our advisor currently owns 20,000 limited partnership units of our operating partnership, for which it contributed $200,000. Our advisor may not sell any of these units during the period it serves as our advisor. We serve as the general partner of our operating partnership and currently own 200 general partnership units for which we contributed $2,000. As of December 31, 2004, we owned approximately 67,719,683 limited partnership units or 99.9% of our operating partnership. The parent of our advisor owns 10,000 Special Units, for which it contributed $1,000. An affiliate of our advisor also owns 200 shares of our common stock, which it acquired upon our initial formation. The resale of any shares by our affiliates is subject to the provisions of Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, which rule limits the number of shares that may be sold at any one time and the manner of such resale.
Although our advisor and its affiliates generally are not prohibited from acquiring our common shares, our advisor has no options or warrants to acquire shares and has no current plans to acquire shares. The affiliate of our advisor which owns outstanding shares has agreed to abstain from voting any shares it now owns or hereafter acquires in any vote for the election of directors or any vote regarding the approval or termination of any contract with our advisor or any of its affiliates.
As of December 31, 2004, all of our properties were managed by third party property managers. However, in the future some or all of our properties may be managed and leased by our property manager pursuant to the Property Management Agreement described below. Our property manager is an affiliate of our advisor. Our property manager is indirectly majority owned and/or controlled by John A. Blumberg, Thomas I. Florence, James R. Mulvihill, Thomas G. Wattles and Evan H. Zucker and their affiliates.
We have entered into a Property Management Agreement with our property manager pursuant to which we will pay certain property management and leasing fees to our property manager. The amount of such fees shall not exceed the lesser of 3% of the gross revenues or 0.6% of the net asset value (as defined in the property management agreement) of the properties we own. We may also pay a separate fee for the one-time lease-up of newly-constructed properties in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged in arm's length transactions. As of December 31, 2004, we had not paid our property manager any property management or leasing fees.
92
Our dealer manager is an affiliate of both our advisor and our property manager.
We have entered into a Dealer Manager Agreement with our dealer manager pursuant to which we will pay a dealer manager fee of up to 2.0% of gross offering proceeds raised pursuant to our public offerings to our dealer manager as compensation for managing the offering. Our dealer manager may re-allow a portion of such fees to broker-dealers who participate in the offering. We will also pay up to a 6% sales commission of gross offering proceeds raised pursuant to our public offerings. Our dealer manager has indicated that all of the sales commissions are expected to be paid to participating broker-dealers who are responsible for effecting sales. As of December 31, 2004, all sales commissions were re-allowed to participating broker-dealers. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we incurred approximately $42.5 million and $11.2 million, respectively, payable to our dealer manager for dealer manager fees and sales commissions. We did not incur any such fees and commissions during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
We have also entered into a dealer manager agreement with our dealer manager pursuant to which we will pay a dealer manager fee of up to 1.5% of the gross equity proceeds raised through our operating partnership's private placement. We will also pay our dealer manager a sales commission up to 5.0% of the gross equity proceeds raised through our operating partnership's private placement. Our dealer manager has indicated that all of the sales commissions are expected to be paid to participating broker-dealers who are responsible for affecting sales. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we incurred up front fees of approximately $1.7 million and $175,000, respectively, payable to our dealer manager for dealer manager fees and sales commissions. We did not incur any such fees and commissions during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
Pursuant to our first and second public offerings, our dealer manager earned one soliciting dealer warrant for every 25 shares sold. The holder of a soliciting dealer warrant has the right to purchase one share of common stock for $12. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, our dealer manager had earned approximately 1,701,000 and 499,000 soliciting dealer warrants, respectively. There were no warrants earned for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. There are no warrants being offered in connection with our third public offering.
Our facilitator is an affiliate of our advisor, our dealer manager and our property manager.
We have entered into an agreement with our facilitator whereby our operating partnership will pay a transaction facilitation fee of up to 1.5% of the gross equity proceeds raised through our operating partnership's private placement. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, our operating partnership incurred transaction facilitation fees equal to $390,933 and $40,435, respectively.
93
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA
We invest in commercial real estate properties consisting primarily of high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties that are net leased to creditworthy corporate customers. These facilities will generally be located in the top 25 distribution and logistics markets in the United States. Such properties may include properties which are under development or construction, newly constructed or have been constructed and have operating histories. In addition, we may acquire properties with some level of vacancy at the time of closing.
Our investment objectives are:
We cannot assure you that we will attain these objectives or that our capital will not decrease. We may not change our investment objectives, except upon approval of shareholders holding a majority of the shares. Decisions relating to the purchase or sale of properties will be made by the Advisor, subject to approval by the board of directors. See "Management" for a description of the background and experience of the directors and executive officers.
In determining whether to pursue a listing of our common stock, a merger of Dividend Capital Trust with a publicly traded company or a sale of our properties, the Advisor and the board of directors will evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of each such alternative. We may retain the services of an unaffiliated investment banking firm to assist us in evaluating these alternatives. In order to satisfy the requirements contained in our articles of incorporation, a merger or sale transaction must provide our shareholders with a combination of cash and/or securities of a publicly traded company and a listing must result in our common stock being listed on a national securities exchange or the Nasdaq National Market.
We have developed and are currently implementing a comprehensive investment strategy. The four principal components are:
94
Target Market and Submarket Selection
We have identified target markets which should continue to have growing demand for distribution space, and which exhibit one or more of the following characteristics:
We presently intend to focus primarily on the top 25 distribution and logistics markets in the United States exhibiting these characteristics. These markets have significant warehouse, transportation and distribution capabilities. Within these markets, certain submarkets will be targeted based on a number of factors including submarket size and depth, interstate highway access and potential for rental rate growth.
Bulk Distribution and Light Industrial Facilities
Within the industrial real estate sector, bulk distribution and light industrial buildings have been selected for their cash flow characteristics including stability, low turnover costs, re-leasability due to their generic design and their liquidity given institutional demand for these types of industrial buildings. We may also, to a limited extent, invest in service center or flex properties. Although the characteristics of individual investments may vary, typical physical characteristics are summarized below.
|
Bulk Distribution |
Light Industrial |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Building size (square feet) | 150,000 to 1 million | 75,000 to 150,000 | ||
Clear height | 24' to 36' | 18' to 26' | ||
Loading | Dock high | Dock high | ||
Truck court depth (feet) | 90 - 200 | 90 - 120 | ||
Building depth (feet) | 200 - 600 | 90 - 200 | ||
Percentage office space | 2% - 10% | 10% - 25% | ||
Primary use | Distribution | Distribution/Light Assembly |
Portfolio Diversification
Our objective is to build a high quality diversified portfolio. While there can be no assurance that we can achieve these objectives in the desired time frame or at all, we are working to diversify our portfolio as follows:
95
Creditworthy National, Regional and Local Customers
We are in a customer service oriented business and we believe our success is strongly correlated with the level of customer service that we are able to provide to our tenants and as such we view our tenants as our "customers". Furthermore, our objective is to invest in high-quality real estate which is leased to creditworthy customers which operate nationally, regionally, or locally.
As of March 31, 2005, we owned approximately 19.7 million square feet of rentable distribution space and we had one tenant that occupied more than 5% of our total rentable square feet, Technicolor Videocassette Inc. Technicolor Videocassette occupies 1,450,750 square feet of space in two facilities, the Technicolor II and Shelby 19 distribution facilities. The space leased to Technicolor Videocassette Inc. represents approximately 7.4% of the total rentable square feet comprising our portfolio.
Acquisition and Investment Policies
We will generally seek to invest substantially all of the net offering proceeds in high-quality commercial real estate, the majority of which is anticipated to include industrial buildings located primarily in the top 25 U.S. industrial markets. We may also consider investment in certain industrial properties located in Mexico and Canada. We may acquire properties which are newly constructed, under construction, or which have been previously constructed and have operating histories. We may also develop new properties directly or in joint ventures with third party developers. These properties are generally anticipated to provide generic storage and work space suitable for and adaptable to a broad range of customers and uses. We will primarily attempt to acquire existing properties, the space in which has been leased or pre-leased to national, regional and local users who satisfy our standards of creditworthiness. However, we may acquire properties with some level of vacancy at the time of closing. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaTerms of Leases and Customer Creditworthiness").
We will seek to invest in properties that will satisfy one of our primary objectives of providing cash distributions to our shareholders. However, because a significant factor in the valuation of income-producing properties is their potential for future income, we anticipate that the majority of properties we acquire will have both the potential to grow in both income and value. To the extent feasible, we will attempt to invest in a diversified portfolio of properties, in terms of geography and industry group of our customers, that will satisfy our investment objectives of maximizing cash available for payment of cash distributions, preserving our capital and realizing growth in value upon the ultimate sale of our properties. However, there may nevertheless be concentrations in our portfolio based on the geographic location, type of property and industry group of customers which may expose us to greater risks than would exist in a more diversified portfolio.
We anticipate that approximately 91.2% of the gross offering proceeds, assuming we sell 72,770,273 shares to the public and 23,650,339 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, will be used to acquire properties and the balance will be used to pay various fees and expenses.
We will not invest more than 10% of our total assets available for investment in unimproved or non-income producing properties. A property which is expected to produce income within two years of its acquisition will not be considered a non-income producing property. Our investment in real estate generally will take the form of holding fee title or a long-term leasehold estate. We intend to acquire such interests either directly in our operating partnership, indirectly through limited liability companies or through investments in joint ventures, general partnerships, co-tenancies or other co-ownership arrangements with the developers of the properties, affiliates of the Advisor or other persons. (See "Investment Objectives and CriteriaJoint Venture Investments"). In addition, we may purchase properties and lease them back to the sellers of such properties.
96
While we will use our best efforts to structure any such sale-leaseback transaction such that the lease will be characterized as a "true lease" so that we will be treated as the owner of the property for federal income tax purposes, we cannot assure you that the Internal Revenue Service will not challenge such characterization. In the event that any such recharacterization were successful, deductions for depreciation and cost recovery relating to such property would be disallowed and it is possible that under some circumstances we could fail to qualify as a REIT as a result. (See "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsSale-Leaseback Transactions"). Although we are not limited as to the geographic area where we may conduct our operations, we presently intend to invest in properties located primarily in the United States.
We are not specifically limited in the number or size of properties we may invest in or on the percentage of net offering proceeds which we may invest in a single property. The number and mix of properties we acquire will depend upon real estate and market conditions and other circumstances existing at the time we are acquiring our properties and the amount of proceeds we raise in this offering.
In recommending investments to the board of directors and/or the Investment Committee, the Advisor will consider relevant real estate property and financial factors, including the local industrial market conditions, location of the property, its design and functionality, the strength of the tenancy, its income-producing capacity, its prospects for long-range appreciation and its liquidity relative to other real estate assets. With respect to land and development opportunities, additional factors such as total development costs, construction and leasing risk, if any, will also be considered. In this regard, the Advisor will have substantial discretion with respect to the selection of specific investments. Our obligation to close the purchase of any investment will generally be conditioned upon the delivery and verification of certain documents from the seller or developer, including, where appropriate:
We will not close the acquisition of any property unless and until we obtain an environmental assessment (generally a minimum of a Phase I review) for each property to be acquired and are generally satisfied with the environmental status of the property.
In determining whether to purchase a particular property, we may, in accordance with customary practices, obtain an option on such property. The amount paid for an option, if any, is normally surrendered if the property is not purchased and is normally credited against the purchase price if the property is purchased.
In acquiring, leasing and developing real estate properties, we will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:
97
Development and Construction of Properties
We may invest a portion of the net offering proceeds in properties on which improvements are to be constructed or completed. We may also commit to purchase, at a future date, properties under development. However, we will not invest in excess of 10% of our total assets in properties which are not expected to produce income within two years of their acquisition. To help ensure performance by the general contractors or developers of properties which are under construction, we expect that completion of properties under construction shall be guaranteed at the price contracted either by an adequate completion bond or performance bond. The Advisor may rely upon the substantial net worth of the contractor or developer or a personal guarantee accompanied by financial statements showing a substantial net worth provided by an affiliate of the person entering into the construction or development contract as an alternative to a completion bond or performance bond. Development of real estate properties is subject to risks relating to a builder's ability to control construction costs or to build in conformity with plans, specifications and timetables. (See "Risk FactorsReal Estate Risks"). The Advisor may elect to employ one or more project managers (who under some circumstances may be affiliated with the Advisor or our property manager) to plan, supervise and implement the development of any unimproved properties which we may acquire. Such persons would be compensated by Dividend Capital Trust.
Acquisition of Properties from the Advisor
We may acquire properties, directly or through joint ventures, from the Advisor or its affiliates. Any such acquisitions will be approved consistent with the conflict of interest procedures described above. (See "Conflicts of InterestCertain Conflict Resolution Procedures").
Terms of Leases and Customer Creditworthiness
The terms and conditions of any lease we enter into with our customers may vary substantially from those we describe in this prospectus. However, we expect that a majority of our leases will be what is generally referred to as "net" leases. A "net" lease provides that the customer will be required to pay or reimburse us for repairs, maintenance, property taxes, utilities, insurance, management and other operating costs. As landlord, we will generally have responsibility for certain capital repairs or replacement of specific structural components of a property such as the roof of the building, the truck court and parking areas, as well as the interior floor or slab of the building.
The Advisor has developed specific standards for determining the creditworthiness of potential customers of our properties. While authorized to enter into leases with any type of customer, we anticipate that a majority of our customers will be corporations or other entities which have significant net worth, or whose lease obligations are guaranteed by another corporation or entity with a substantial net worth or who otherwise meet creditworthiness standards that will be applied by the Advisor.
98
We anticipate that a portion of any tenant improvements required to be funded by us in connection with newly acquired properties will be funded from our net offering proceeds. We may acquire properties with vacancy and at such time as a customer at one of our properties does not renew its lease or otherwise vacates its space in one of our buildings, it is likely that, in order to attract new customers, we will be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to the vacated space. Since we do not anticipate maintaining permanent working capital reserves, we may not have access to funds required in the future for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments in order to attract new customers to lease vacated space. (See "Risk FactorsReal Estate Risks").
We may enter into joint ventures in the future, including with affiliated entities, for the acquisition, development or improvement of properties for the purpose of diversifying our portfolio of assets. We may also enter into joint ventures, general partnerships, co-tenancies and other participations with real estate developers, owners and others for the purpose of developing, owning and leasing real properties. We may enter into certain joint ventures with developers to (i) acquire existing properties, (ii) obtain acquisition rights on future properties to be built or leased, or both. Depending upon the circumstances, the joint ventures may include a debt and/or an equity component. (See "Conflicts of Interest").
In addition, we may enter into joint ventures in which our venture partner may have the right to exchange its interest in the joint venture for shares of our common stock or other equity interests in our company. Moreover, the price at which our venture partner may acquire our shares may not be commensurate with the current offering price of our common stock.
In determining whether to recommend a particular joint venture, the Advisor will evaluate the real property which such joint venture owns or is being formed to own or develop under the same criteria described elsewhere in this prospectus for the selection of real estate property investments of Dividend Capital Trust. (See "Investment Objectives and Criteria").
We may enter into joint ventures with affiliates of the Advisor for the acquisition of properties, but only provided that:
To the extent possible we will attempt to obtain a right of first refusal or right of first offer to buy such property if such venture partner elects to sell its interest in the property held by the joint venture. In the event that the venture partner were to elect to sell property held in any such joint venture, we may not have sufficient funds to exercise our right of first refusal or right of first offer to buy the venture partner's interest in the property held by the joint venture. In the event that any joint venture with an affiliated entity holds interests in more than one property, the interest in each such property may be specially allocated based upon the respective proportion of funds invested by each partner in each such property. Entering into joint ventures with affiliates of the Advisor will result in certain conflicts of interest. (See "Conflicts of InterestJoint Ventures with Affiliates of the Advisor").
Our Operating Partnership's Private Placement
Our operating partnership is currently offering undivided tenancy-in-common interests in industrial properties to accredited investors in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act. We anticipate that these tenancy-in-common interests may serve as replacement properties for
99
investors seeking to complete like-kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, the tenancy-in-common interests sold to investors will be 100% leased by our operating partnership, and such leases will contain purchase options whereby our operating partnership will have the right to acquire the tenancy-in-common interests from the investors at a later point in time in exchange for limited partnership units, or DCX Units, in our operating partnership under Section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Our operating partnership will pay certain up-front fees and reimburse certain related expenses to the Advisor, Dealer Manager and the Facilitator for raising capital through the private placement. The Advisor is obligated to pay all of the offering and marketing related costs associated with the private placement. However, our operating partnership is obligated to pay the Advisor a non-accountable fee for such costs which equals 2% of the gross equity proceeds raised through this private placement. In addition, our operating partnership is obligated to pay the Dealer Manager a dealer manager fee of up to 1.5% of gross proceeds raised and a commission of up to 5% of gross equity proceeds raised through this private placement. The Dealer Manager may re-allow such commissions to the effecting broker dealers. Our operating partnership is also obligated to pay a transaction facilitation fee to the Facilitator, an affiliate of the Advisor, of up to 1.5% of gross equity proceeds raised.
From November 26, 2003 through March 31, 2005, we raised $50.6 million of gross proceeds (of which $44.8 million was gross equity proceeds) from the sale of tenancy-in-common interests in six industrial buildings. Our operating partnership incurred up-front costs of approximately $4.4 million payable to the Advisor and other affiliates for effecting these transactions.
Borrowing Policies and Related Indebtedness
Our ability to increase our diversification through borrowing could be adversely impacted by banks and other lending institutions reducing the amount of funds available for loans secured by real estate. When interest rates on mortgage loans are high or financing is otherwise unavailable on a timely basis, we may purchase certain properties for cash with the intention of obtaining a mortgage loan for a portion of the purchase price at a later time. Additionally, all financing arrangements must be approved by a majority of our board members including a majority of our independent board members.
There is no limitation on the amount we may invest in any single improved property. However, under our articles of incorporation, we have a limitation on borrowing which precludes us from borrowing in the aggregate in excess of 50% of the value of the cost of our properties before non-cash reserves and depreciation.
By operating on a leveraged basis, we will have more funds available for investment in properties. This will allow us to make more investments than would otherwise be possible, resulting in a more diversified portfolio. Our use of leverage increases the risk of default on the mortgage payments and a resulting foreclosure of a particular property. (See "Risk FactorsReal Estate Risks"). To the extent that we do not obtain mortgage loans on our properties, our ability to acquire additional properties will be restricted. The Advisor will use its best efforts to obtain financing on the most favorable terms available to us. Lenders may have recourse to assets not securing the repayment of the indebtedness. The Advisor will refinance properties during the term of a loan only in limited circumstances, such as when a decline in interest rates makes it beneficial to prepay an existing mortgage, when an existing mortgage matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such investment. The benefits of the refinancing may include an increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing, if any, and an increase in property ownership if some refinancing proceeds are reinvested in real estate.
We may not borrow money from any of our directors or from the Advisor or its affiliates for the purpose of acquiring real properties. Any loans by such parties for other purposes must be approved by
100
a majority of the directors not otherwise interested in the transaction (including a majority of the independent directors) as fair, competitive and commercially reasonable and no less favorable to Dividend Capital Trust than comparable loans between unaffiliated parties.
The following provides additional information with regards to our debt and hedging activities as of March 31, 2005.
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
We have a senior secured revolving credit facility with a current capacity of $225 million with a syndicated group led by JP Morgan Securities (formerly BankOne). The credit facility currently bears interest at either LIBOR plus 1.125% to 1.500%, or, at our election, the prime rate and is subject to an annual 0.250% facility fee. This credit facility contains various covenants including financial covenants regarding net worth, interest and fixed charge coverage and consolidated leverage.
Fixed Rate, Non-Recourse Mortgage Loans
In January 2005, we entered into $57.0 million of secured, non-recourse debt with a stated fixed interest rate of 4.40% which matures in 2010. The underlying notes require monthly payments of interest only until January 1, 2006 at which time monthly payments of principal and interest will be required. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we assumed three secured, non-recourse notes, totaling $22.5 million, excluding premiums, in conjunction with the acquisition of three properties. These assumed notes bear fixed interest rates ranging from 5.69% to 7.40% and require monthly payments of principal and interest. The maturity dates of such assumed notes range from December 2013 to November 2022.
As of March 31, 2005, the gross book value of all our properties was approximately $855.3 million and the total gross book value of all properties securing our fixed rate mortgage debt and secured credit facility was approximately $353.4 million and $282.4 million, respectively. Our debt has various covenants and management believes we were in compliance with all of these covenants as of March 31, 2005.
Hedging Activities
We continue to enter into hedging transactions in the form of forward treasury locks in anticipation of issuing future fixed rate debt to fund future property acquisitions. We are entering into such treasury locks to hedge our exposure to the variability in interest rates and are therefore mitigating the risk of changes in future payments of interest for anticipated fixed rate debt issuances over a maximum period of 12 months (excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on our existing senior secured revolving credit facility). As required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. These forward treasury lock hedges have been designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
As of March 31, 2005, we had entered into a total of six cash flow hedging transactions, of which three have been settled. Of the three settled hedges, two have been attributed to fixed rate debt and the balances of such hedges are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the assigned debt, and the third hedge was re-hedged on the date of settlement. The three unsettled hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) at their fair value. As of March 31, 2005, these outstanding derivatives with a fair value of $2.4 million were included in other assets. Unrealized gains of $2.1 million and $150,000 were recorded during the first quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively, to shareholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) as a result of the change in fair value of the outstanding hedges.
101
As of March 31, 2005, the total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) balance pertaining to the cash flow hedges was approximately $2.0 million. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to cash flow hedges will be amortized to interest expense as interest payments are made on our anticipated future debt issuance. During the next 12 months, we estimate that $528,000 will be amortized from other comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense resulting in an increase of our interest expense.
We have acquired and intend to continue to acquire properties for investment with an expectation of holding each property for an extended period. However, circumstances might arise which could result in the early sale of some properties. A property may be sold before the end of the expected holding period if:
The determination of whether a particular property should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view to achieving maximum capital appreciation. We cannot assure you that this objective will be realized. The selling price of a property which is net leased will be determined in large part by the amount of rent payable under the lease. If a customer has a repurchase option at a formula price, we may be limited in realizing any appreciation. In connection with our sales of properties we may lend the purchaser a significant portion of the purchase price. In these instances, our taxable income may exceed the cash received in the sale. (See "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsRequirements for Qualification as a REITOperational RequirementsAnnual Distribution Requirement").
The terms of payment will be affected by custom in the area in which the property being sold is located and the then-prevailing interest rates and real estate market conditions. If we do not list our common stock for trading on a national securities exchange or an over-the-counter market, complete a sale or merger of Dividend Capital Trust in a transaction which provides our shareholders with a combination of cash and/or securities of a publicly traded company or sell substantially all of our properties for cash or other consideration by February 2013, our articles of incorporation require us to begin selling our properties and other assets and to distribute the net proceeds to our shareholders. In making the decision to apply for listing of our common stock, the directors will try to determine whether listing our common stock or liquidating our assets will result in greater value for the shareholders. It cannot be determined at this time the circumstances, if any, under which the directors will agree to list our common stock or to pursue a stock for stock merger with a listed company. We will continue in existence until all properties are sold and our other assets are liquidated.
Our articles of incorporation place numerous limitations on us with respect to the manner in which we may invest our funds. These limitations cannot be changed unless our articles of incorporation are amended, which requires the approval of the shareholders. Unless the articles are amended, we will not:
102
under "Federal Income Tax Considerations" when used solely for the purpose of hedging in connection with our ordinary business of investing in real estate assets and mortgages;
The Advisor will continually review our investment activity to attempt to ensure that we do not come within the application of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Among other things, the Advisor
103
will attempt to monitor the proportion of our assets that are placed in various investments so that we do not come within the definition of an "investment company" under the act. If at any time the character of our investments could cause us to be deemed an investment company for purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940, we will take the necessary action to attempt to ensure that we are not deemed to be an "investment company."
Objectives and Limitations
Our articles of incorporation require that the independent directors review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interest of the shareholders. Each determination and the basis therefore shall be set forth in our minutes. The methods of implementing our investment policies also may vary as new investment techniques are developed. The methods of implementing our investment objectives and policies, except as otherwise provided in the organizational documents, may be altered by a majority of the directors, including a majority of the independent directors, without the approval of the shareholders.
104
We invest in commercial real estate properties consisting primarily of high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties that are net leased to creditworthy corporate customers. These facilities will generally be located in the top 25 distribution and logistics markets in the United States. We primarily enter into "net" leases, the majority of which we expect will have five to ten year original lease terms, and many of which will have renewal options for additional periods. "Net" means that the customer is responsible for repairs, maintenance, property taxes, utilities, insurance and other operating costs. We expect that the majority of our leases will provide that we as landlord have responsibility for certain capital repairs or replacement of specific structural components of a property such as the roof of the building, the truck court and parking areas, as well as the interior floor or slab of the building.
The table below provides information regarding the properties we own. We purchased all of these properties from unaffiliated third parties. These properties will be subject to competition from similar properties within their market areas and their economic performance could be affected by changes in local economic conditions. In evaluating these properties for acquisition, we considered a variety of factors including location, functionality and design, price per square foot, the creditworthiness of customers and the in-place rental rates compared to market rates.
As of March 31, 2005, we owned 112 properties located in 17 markets across the United States, 97 of which were acquired after March 31, 2004. The following table describes our portfolio as of March 31, 2005.
|
As of March 31, 2005 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Market |
Number of Buildings |
Gross Book Value |
Gross Leaseable Area |
Occupancy(1) |
||||||
Atlanta | 18 | $ | 147,536,587 | 3,946,931 | 88.0% | |||||
Boston | 5 | 26,897,276 | 405,741 | 78.2% | ||||||
Chicago | 2 | 33,096,000 | 661,785 | 100.0% | ||||||
Cincinnati | 7 | 78,930,383 | 1,797,369 | 97.6% | ||||||
Dallas | 18 | 93,181,861 | 2,330,906 | 90.6% | ||||||
Denver | 1 | 8,999,806 | 160,232 | 100.0% | ||||||
Houston | 21 | 83,807,929 | 1,622,270 | 88.2% | ||||||
Indianapolis | 1 | 15,186,262 | 422,127 | 100.0% | ||||||
Los Angeles | 4 | 32,743,856 | 444,066 | 100.0% | ||||||
Louisville | 2 | 18,350,820 | 521,000 | 100.0% | ||||||
Memphis | 7 | 114,199,030 | 3,115,756 | 99.3% | ||||||
Nashville | 3 | 59,340,369 | 1,699,530 | 100.0% | ||||||
Orlando | 2 | 15,779,127 | 367,137 | 100.0% | ||||||
Philadelphia | 1 | 5,163,291 | 100,000 | 100.0% | ||||||
Phoenix | 13 | 78,945,463 | 1,474,963 | 87.5% | ||||||
San Antonio | 2 | 7,724,491 | 172,050 | 100.0% | ||||||
San Francisco | 5 | 35,387,439 | 474,636 | 100.0% | ||||||
Total | 112 | $ | 855,269,990 | 19,736,499 | 93.8% | |||||
105
whereby the sellers are obligated to pay monthly rent until the earlier of the expiration of the master lease agreement or commencement of rent from a new customer. The total percentage of square feet leased, including space covered by master leases, was 97.1% as of March 31, 2005. For financial reporting purposes under GAAP, rental and expense recovery payments under master lease agreements are reflected as a reduction of the basis of the underlying property rather than rental revenues.
Bridgestone/Firestone Distribution CenterNashville, TN
We acquired Bridgestone/Firestone Distribution Center, a one-story, cross-docked, single-customer distribution facility with 756,030 square feet leased to Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC. Located off I-40 just east of State Highway 109 in Lebanon, Tennessee, this east Nashville submarket, together with the Southeast submarket, are the primary locations of Nashville's class A distribution market. Prior to the end of the seventh year of the initial lease term, Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC has the option to require us to build out an additional 250,000 square feet of expansion space. Upon completion of the build out, the customer would be required to lease the entire facility for at least five additional years from the expansion space lease commencement date. The total cost of the Nashville facility was approximately $24.5 million (including an acquisition fee of $705,000 paid to the Advisor).
Chickasaw Distribution CenterMemphis, TN
We acquired Chickasaw A and H, two buildings which are part of a master planned park called Chickasaw Distribution Center located in Memphis, Tennessee. The Chickasaw facilities are located in the southeastern Memphis market, two minutes from the Memphis International Airport, five minutes from US 78, 14 minutes from I-55 and seven minutes from I-240. These buildings total 392,006 square feet. The total cost of Chickasaw was approximately $14.8 million (including an acquisition fee of $428,000 paid to the Advisor).
Rancho Technology ParkLos Angeles, CA
We acquired Rancho Technology Park, a one-story, 2002 constructed distribution facility with 201,493 square feet. This building is located two and a half miles from the Ontario International Airport and two miles from I-10 with easy access to I-15. Rancho Cucamonga is part of the Inland Empire, a major distribution space sub-market of Los Angeles. The cost of the Rancho Facility was approximately $10.4 million (including an acquisition fee of $297,795 paid to the Advisor).
Mallard Lake Distribution CenterChicago, IL
We acquired Mallard Lake Distribution Center, a 222,122 square foot, rear load distribution facility located in a master planned park in Hanover Park, Illinois, a sub-market of Chicago. Hanover Park is part of the Dupage County sub-market, a major submarket of Chicago located seven miles from O'Hare Airport. The facility is fully leased to Iron Mountain Inc., an international information storage, management and protection services company. The total cost of Mallard Lake was approximately $11.4 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $330,000 paid to the Advisor).
West by Northwest Business CenterHouston, TX
We acquired West by Northwest Business Center, a 189,467 square foot distribution facility located in Houston's northwest submarket. West by Northwest is located adjacent to the intersection of the Houston toll road 8 and highway 290 with Hempstead Highway to the south. The total cost of West by Northwest (including an acquisition fee of approximately $248,000 paid to the Advisor) was approximately $8.6 million of which $290,000 is being held in escrow for future tenant improvements.
106
Park West Distribution FacilityCincinnati, OH
We acquired three rear-loading distribution facilities totaling 470,957 rentable square feet. Park West, a master planned distribution park, is located in Hebron, Kentucky, a submarket of Cincinnati, which is approximately six minutes from the Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Airport. The total cost of Park West was approximately $25.1 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $727,500 paid to the Advisor).
Pinnacle Industrial CenterDallas, TX
We acquired the Pinnacle Distribution Facilities, comprised of two buildings totaling approximately 730,000 square feet located in Dallas, Texas. Pinnacle is located on I-30, with close proximity to I-20 and downtown Dallas, south and east of the Dallas Fort Worth International Airport. The total cost of Pinnacle was approximately $29.3 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $849,000 paid to the Advisor).
DFW Trade CenterDallas, TX
We acquired the DFW Distribution Facility ("DFW"), a 252,776 square foot distribution facility located in the Las Colinas Airport submarket of Dallas, Texas. The building is located five miles north of DFW Airport on State Highway 121 and has easy access to all quadrants of the metroplex. The total cost of DFW was approximately $11.4 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $330,000 paid to the Advisor).
Plainfield Distribution CenterIndianapolis, IN
We acquired Plainfield Distribution Center, a 442,127 square foot distribution facility in Plainfield, Indiana, a submarket of Indianapolis ("Plainfield") located on I-70 less than four miles from Indianapolis International Airport. The total cost of Plainfield was approximately $15.7 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $453,210 paid to the Advisor).
Eastgate Distribution Center IIINashville, TN
We acquired Eastgate Distribution Center III, a 423,500 square foot distribution facility located in Lebanon, Tennessee, a sub-market of Nashville. The building is located one mile west of the intersection of I-40 and Highway 109, and is located 20 miles east of the Nashville Metropolitan Airport. The total cost of Eastgate was approximately $14.8 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $429,000 paid to the Advisor).
Newpoint I Business ParkAtlanta, GA
We acquired Newpoint I Business Park, a generic Class A, 414,160 square foot distribution facility located in Lawrenceville, Georgia, which is part of the major I-85-Northeast sub-market of Atlanta. The total cost of Newpoint was approximately $15.1 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $346,400 paid to the Advisor).
Northwest Business Center and Riverport Commerce CenterCincinnati, OH and Louisville, KY
We acquired Northwest Business Center and Riverport Commerce Center, two distribution facilities totaling 426,500 square feet. One building, totaling 126,500 square feet, is located in the Northwest Business Center in Springdale, Ohio, a sub-market of Cincinnati. The other building, totaling 300,000 square feet, is located in the Riverport Industrial Park in Riverport, Kentucky, a sub-market of Louisville. The total cost of Northwest Business Center and Riverport Commerce Center
107
was approximately $14.9 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $145,000 paid to the Advisor).
Bondesen, Beltway 8, and Rittiman Business ParksHouston, TX and San Antonio, TX
We acquired nine distribution facilities and four service centers totaling 798,410 square feet. Seven buildings, totaling 364,801 square feet, are located in the Bondesen Business Park in Houston, Texas, including three distribution facilities and four service centers. Four distribution centers, totaling 261,559 square feet, are also located in Houston, Texas in the Beltway 8 Business Park. The remaining two distribution centers, totaling 172,050 square feet, are located in the Rittiman Business Park in San Antonio, Texas. The total cost of the thirteen buildings was approximately $50.8 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $500,000 paid to the Advisor).
Eagles Landing, Southcreek Distribution Centers I and IIAtlanta, GA
We acquired Eagles Landing and Southcreek Distribution Centers I and II, three distribution facilities totaling 1,257,170 square feet. Southcreek Distribution Centers I and II is comprised of two distribution facilities totaling 752,170 square feet, which are located in Fairburn, Georgia, a sub-market of Atlanta. The remaining distribution facility, Eagles Landing, totaling 505,000 square feet, is located in Stockbridge, Georgia, also a sub-market of Atlanta. The total cost of Eagles Landing and Southcreek Distribution Centers I and II was approximately $36.5 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $359,000 paid to the Advisor).
Park West A, B, and G and Mid-South Logistics Center VCincinnati, OH and Nashville, TN
We acquired three distribution facilities totaling 1,199,600 square feet located in Hebron, Kentucky, a sub-market of Cincinnati, and one distribution facility, totaling 520,000 square feet, located in La Vergne, Tennessee, a sub-market of Nashville. The total cost of Park West A, B, G, and Mid South Logistics Center V was approximately $68.3 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $643,500 paid to the Advisor). The buildings were purchased from proceeds of our public offering and the assumption of three existing non-recourse mortgage loans. The outstanding principal balance of the three mortgage loans totaled approximately $41.8 million. These loans mature in 2008 and 2012 and have a weighted average interest rate of 6.9%.
Memphis Trade Center IIIMemphis, TN
We acquired Memphis Trade Center III, a distribution facility totaling 708,800 square feet located in Memphis, Tennessee. The total cost of Memphis Trade Center III was approximately $24.5 million (including an acquisition fee of approximately $242,000 paid to the Advisor).
SouthCreek Distribution Center IIIFairburn, GA
We acquired SouthCreek Distribution Center III, a distribution facility totaling 504,000 square feet. The facility is located along the I-85 corridor in Fairburn, Coweta County, Georgia, which is 6.5 miles southwest of I-285 and Jackson Hartsfield International Airport. The total cost of this facility is approximately $15.1 million (including an acquisition fee of $149,000 paid to the Advisor).
Trade Pointe IIILouisville, KY
We acquired Trade Pointe III, a distribution facility totaling 221,000 square feet. The facility is located approximately 2.2 miles from the intersection of I-265 (Gene Snyder Freeway) and U.S. 60-31W (Dixie Highway) in Riverport, Kentucky, a submarket of Louisville. The facility is situated at the gateway to the Riverport Industrial Park, a 2,000 acre planned industrial park, a premier industrial
108
location in Louisville. The total cost of this facility is approximately $8.3 million (including an acquisition fee of $80,000 paid to the Advisor).
Interpark 70Denver, CO
We acquired Interpark 70, a distribution facility totaling 160,233 square feet. The facility is located near the intersection of I-70 and I-225 in Denver, Colorado. The total cost of this facility is approximately $8.9 million (including an acquisition fee of $86,000 paid to the Advisor).
Six market portfolio of bulk distribution and light industrial buildingsAtlanta, GA, Boston, MA, Dallas, TX, Houston, TX, Phoenix, AZ and San Francisco, CA
We acquired a portfolio of 53 buildings totaling 4,890,753 square feet located in the following six markets: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Houston, Phoenix and San Francisco. The total cost of this portfolio is approximately $238.5 million (including an acquisition fee of $2.3 million paid to the Advisor).
Cypress Park EastCentral Park, FL
We acquired two distribution facilities totaling 367,167 square feet that are located in Central Park, a submarket of Orlando, Florida. The total cost of these facilities is approximately $15.7 million (including an acquisition fee of $154,000 paid to the Advisor).
Bayside Distribution CenterHayward, CA
We acquired two distribution facilities totaling 340,765 square feet that are located in Hayward, California, a submarket of San Francisco. The total cost of these facilities is approximately $22.1 million (including an acquisition fee of $218,000 paid to the Advisor).
Norcross FacilitiesAtlanta, GA
We acquired two distribution facilities totaling 458,426 square feet that are located in the Northeast market, a submarket of Atlanta, Georgia. The total cost of these facilities is approximately $17.5 million (including an acquisition fee of $172,000 paid to the Advisor).
Sky Harbor Transit CenterPhoenix, AZ
We acquired a bulk distribution building totaling 145,228 square feet. The Sky Harbor Transit Center is located in the South Central sub-market of Phoenix, Arizona and was constructed in 2002. The total cost of this facility is approximately $10.1 million (including an acquisition fee of $97,000 paid to the Advisor).
C&L FacilitiesFort Worth, TX and Atlanta, GA
We acquired two industrial facilities comprising 445,636 square feet. One facility comprising 405,636 square feet is located in Fort Worth, Texas. Another facility comprising 40,000 square feet is located in Atlanta, Georgia. The total cost of these facilities is approximately $17.9 million (including an acquisition fee of $176,050 paid to the Advisor).
Foothill Business CenterFoothill Ranch, CA
We acquired three distribution buildings comprising 242,573 square feet that are located in South Orange County, a submarket of Los Angeles, California. The total cost of these facilities is approximately $22.4 million (including an acquisition fee of $221,000 paid to the Advisor), which was paid from net proceeds from our prior public offering.
109
Wickes Distribution CenterChicago, IL
We acquired a distribution facility comprising 440,000 square feet that is located in Central DuPage County, a submarket of Chicago, Illinois. The total cost of this facility is approximately $20.6 million (including an acquisition fee of $201,050 payable to the Advisor).
Technicolor II, Shelby 4, Shelby 5 and Shelby 19 Distribution FacilitiesMemphis, TN
We acquired four distribution facilities comprising 2,014,750 square feet that are located in Memphis, Tennessee. The total cost of these facilities was approximately $72.7 million (including an acquisition fee of $714,650 payable to the Advisor).
As of March 31, 2005, we owned approximately 19.7 million square feet of rentable distribution space and we had one tenant that occupied more than 5% of our total rentable square feet, Technicolor Videocassette Inc. Technicolor Videocassette occupies 1,454,750 square feet of space in two facilities, the Technicolor II and Shelby 19 distribution facilities. The space leased to Technicolor Videocassette Inc. represents approximately 7.4% of the total rentable square feet comprising our portfolio.
The following table sets forth a schedule of expiring leases by square footage and by annualized future minimum rents as of March 31, 2005:
Year |
Square Feet Expiring(1) |
Percent of Portfolio |
Annual Future Minimum Rents of Expiring Leases(2) |
Percent of Portfolio |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | 2,106,508 | 10.7% | $ | 65,252,759 | 20.7% | |||||
2006 | 1,925,574 | 9.8% | 56,519,805 | 18.0% | ||||||
2007 | 2,099,959 | 10.6% | 49,816,360 | 15.8% | ||||||
2008 | 3,257,525 | 16.5% | 39,719,240 | 12.6% | ||||||
2009 | 2,108,188 | 10.7% | 30,444,311 | 9.7% | ||||||
Thereafter | 7,015,601 | 35.5% | 72,790,052 | 23.1% | ||||||
Total | 18,513,355 | 93.8% | $ | 314,542,527 | 100.0% | |||||
Insurance Coverage on Properties
We carry comprehensive general liability coverage and umbrella liability coverage on all of our properties with limits of liability which we deem adequate. Similarly, we are insured against the risk of direct physical damage in amounts we believe to be adequate to reimburse us on a replacement basis for costs incurred to repair or rebuild each property, including loss of rental income during the reconstruction period. The cost of such insurance is passed through to customers whenever possible.
110
Additional Property Acquisitions
When we either acquire a significant property or deem there to be a reasonable probability that we will acquire a significant property, we will provide information about such acquisition pursuant to the requirements of Forms 8-K, 10-Q and 10-K.
Since March 31, 2005 through May 23, 2005 we have completed several property acquisitions totaling approximately $119 million. (See the "Recent Developments" section of this prospectus). In addition, as of May 23, 2005, we have entered into six contracts that combine for a total purchase price of approximately $113 million, which we anticipate funding with proceeds raised in our public offerings and debt. While we anticipate that these acquisitions will close over the next several months, the contracts are subject to a number of contingencies and there are no assurances that these acquisitions will transpire.
111
The information presented in this section represents the historical experience of real estate programs sponsored by certain affiliates of the Advisor. Such affiliates consist of John A. Blumberg, James R. Mulvihill and Evan H. Zucker. Prospective investors in Dividend Capital Trust should not assume that they will experience returns, if any, comparable to those realized by investors in any such programs.
As of March 31, 2005, Messrs. Blumberg, Mulvihill and Zucker, directly or indirectly through affiliated entities, have served as sponsors, officers, managers, partners, directors or joint venture partners of two public REITs (American Real Estate Investment Trust and Dividend Capital Trust) and 49 non-public real estate programs. As of March 31, 2005, the public real estate investment trusts had collectively raised approximately $915,000,000 from more than 21,600 investors. The 49 non-public real estate programs raised approximately $510,000,000 from over 600 investors. Collectively, the public real estate investment trusts and the private programs purchased interests in 215 real estate projects. The aggregate combined acquisition and development cost of these 215 projects was approximately $1.7 billion.
Of the 215 total real estate projects, 99 were purchased by the public real estate investment trusts and consisted of industrial properties (comprising 87% of the total amount of the public programs), multi-family properties (comprising 6% of the total amount of the public programs), office properties (comprising 5% of the total amount of the public programs) and retail properties (comprising 2% of the total amount of the public programs). Of these 99 projects, 20 were located in Texas, 15 were located in New Jersey, 14 were located in Arizona, 14 were located in Georgia, 9 were located in Tennessee, 7 were located in California, 5 were located in Colorado, 5 were located in Massachusetts, 3 were located in Ohio, 2 were located in Illinois, 2 were located in Kentucky, 1 was located in Florida, 1 was located in Indiana, and 1 was located in Pennsylvania.
The 116 remaining real estate projects were purchased or developed by the private real estate limited partnerships and consisted of industrial properties (comprising 65% of the total amount of the private programs), multi-family properties (comprising 18% of the total amount of the private programs), land assets (comprising 7% of the total amount of the private programs), golf course properties (comprising 6% of the total amount of the private programs) and retail properties (comprising 4% of the total amount of the private programs). Of these 116 projects, 27 were located in Colorado, 84 were located in Mexico, 4 were located in New Jersey and 1 was located in New York.
In the public real estate investment trusts, 100% of the properties were acquired and none were developed. In the private real estate limited programs, 39% of the properties were acquired and 61% were developed. Of the $1.7 billion combined acquisition and development value of all prior public and private projects, approximately 78% had investment objectives similar to those of Dividend Capital Trust.
112
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary of United States material federal income tax considerations associated with an investment in our common shares that may be relevant to you. The statements made in this section of the prospectus are based upon current provisions of the Code and Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, as currently applicable, currently published administrative positions of the Internal Revenue Service and judicial decisions, all of which are subject to change, either prospectively or retroactively. We cannot assure you that any changes will not modify the conclusions expressed in counsel's opinions described herein. This summary does not address all possible tax considerations that may be material to an investor and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Moreover, this summary does not deal with all tax aspects that might be relevant to you, as a prospective shareholder, in light of your personal circumstances, nor does it deal with particular types of shareholders that are subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws, such as insurance companies, holders whose shares are acquired through the exercise of stock options or otherwise as compensation, holders whose shares are acquired through the distribution reinvestment plan or who intend to sell their shares under the share redemption program, tax-exempt organizations except as provided below, financial institutions or broker-dealers, or foreign corporations or persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States except as provided below. The Code provisions governing the federal income tax treatment of REITs and their shareholders are highly technical and complex, and this summary is qualified in its entirety by the express language of applicable Code provisions, Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP has acted as our special tax counsel, has reviewed this summary and is of the opinion that it fairly summarizes the United States federal income tax considerations that are likely to be material to U.S. shareholders (as defined herein) of our common stock. This opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP will be filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. The opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is based on various assumptions, is subject to limitations and is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or any court.
We urge you, as a prospective shareholder, to consult your tax advisor regarding the specific tax consequences to you of a purchase of shares, ownership and sale of the shares and of our election to be taxed as a REIT, including the federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences of such purchase, ownership, sale and election and of potential changes in applicable tax laws.
REIT Qualification
We intend to elect to be taxable as a REIT commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2003. This section of the prospectus discusses the laws governing the tax treatment of a REIT and its shareholders. These laws are highly technical and complex.
In connection with this offering, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP will deliver an opinion to us that, commencing with Dividend Capital Trust's taxable year that began on January 1, 2003, Dividend Capital Trust was organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT under the Code, and its actual method of operation, and its proposed method of operation has enabled it to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.
It must be emphasized that the opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is based on various assumptions relating to the organization and operation of Dividend Capital Trust, and is conditioned upon representations and covenants made by us regarding our organization, assets and the past, present and future conduct of our business operations. While we intend to operate so that we will qualify as a REIT, given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing
113
importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, no assurance can be given by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP or by us that we will so qualify for any particular year. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP will have no obligation to advise us or the holders of our common stock of any subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed in the opinion, or of any subsequent change in the applicable law. You should be aware that opinions of counsel are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service or any court, and no assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service will not challenge the conclusions set forth in such opinions.
Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends on our ability to meet on a continuing basis, through actual operating results, distribution levels, and diversity of stock ownership, various qualification requirements imposed upon REITs by the Code, the compliance with which will not be reviewed by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Our ability to qualify as a REIT also requires that we satisfy certain asset tests, some of which depend upon the fair market values of assets directly or indirectly owned by us. Such values may not be susceptible to a precise determination. While we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will allow us to qualify as a REIT, no assurance can be given that the actual results of our operations for any taxable year satisfy such requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.
Taxation of Dividend Capital Trust
If we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal corporate income taxes on that portion of our ordinary income or capital gain that we distribute currently to our shareholders, because the REIT provisions of the Code generally allow a REIT to deduct distributions paid to its shareholders. This substantially eliminates the federal "double taxation" on earnings (taxation at both the corporate level and shareholder level) that usually results from an investment in a corporation. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, however, we will be subject to federal income taxation as follows:
114
we will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to the greater of the amount based on the magnitude of the Failure adjusted to reflect the profit margin associated with our gross income;
Requirements for Qualification as a REIT
In order for us to qualify as a REIT, we must meet and continue to meet the requirements discussed below relating to our organization, sources of income, nature of assets and distributions of income to our shareholders.
Organizational Requirements
In order to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code, we must meet tests regarding our income and assets described below and:
We would be treated as closely held if, during the last half of any taxable year, more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock is owned, directly or indirectly through the application of certain attribution rules, by five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code to include certain entities. Items 7 and 8 above will not apply until after the first taxable year for which we elect to be taxed as a REIT. If we comply with Treasury regulations that provide procedures for ascertaining the actual ownership of
115
our common stock for each taxable year and we did not know, and with the exercise of reasonable diligence could not have known, that we failed to meet item 8 above for a taxable year, we will be treated as having met item 8 for that year.
We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2003 and we intend to satisfy the other requirements described in Items 1-6 above at all times during each of our taxable years. In addition, our articles of incorporation contain restrictions regarding ownership and transfer of shares of our stock that are intended to assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements in Items 7 and 8 above. (See "Description of SecuritiesRestriction on Ownership of Common Stock").
For purposes of the requirements described herein, any corporation that is a qualified REIT subsidiary of ours will not be treated as a corporation separate from us and all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction and credit of our qualified REIT subsidiaries will be treated as our assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit. A qualified REIT subsidiary is a corporation, other than a taxable REIT subsidiary (as described below under "Operational RequirementsAsset Tests"), all of the capital stock of which is owned by a REIT.
In the case of a REIT that is a partner in an entity treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes, the REIT is treated as owning its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership and as earning its allocable share of the gross income of the partnership for purposes of the requirements described herein. In addition, the character of the assets and gross income of the partnership will retain the same character in the hands of the REIT for purposes of the REIT requirements, including the asset and income tests described below. As a result, our proportionate share of the assets, liabilities and items of income of our operating partnership and of any other partnership, joint venture, limited liability company or other entity treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes in which we or our operating partnership have an interest will be treated as our assets, liabilities and items of income.
The Code provides relief from violations of the REIT gross income requirements, as described below under "Operational RequirementsGross Income Tests," in cases where a violation is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, and other requirements are met, including the payment of a penalty tax that is based upon the magnitude of the violation. In addition, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the "2004 Act") includes provisions that extend similar relief in the case of certain violations of the REIT asset requirements (see "Operational RequirementsAsset Tests" below) and other REIT requirements, again provided that the violation is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, and other conditions are met, including the payment of a penalty tax. These provisions of the 2004 Act become effective beginning with the 2005 tax year. If we fail to satisfy any of the various REIT requirements, there can be no assurance that these relief provisions would be available to enable us to maintain our qualification as a REIT, and, if available, the amount of any resultant penalty tax could be substantial.
Operational RequirementsGross Income Tests
To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must satisfy annually two gross income requirements.
116
The rents we will receive or be deemed to receive will qualify as "rents from real property" for purposes of satisfying the gross income requirements for a REIT only if the following conditions are met:
We may from time to time enter into hedging transactions with respect to interest rate exposure on one or more of our assets or liabilities. Any such hedging transactions could take a variety of forms, including the use of derivative instruments such as interest rate swap contracts, interest rate cap or floor contracts, futures or forward contracts, and options. For taxable years beginning prior to 2005, to the extent that we enter into such a contract to reduce interest rate risk on indebtedness incurred or to be incurred to acquire or carry real estate assets, any periodic income from the instrument, or gain from the disposition of the instrument, would be qualifying income for purposes of the REIT 95% gross income test, but not for the 75% gross income test. To the extent that we hedge with other types of financial instruments or in other situations (for example, hedges against fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies), the resultant income will be treated as income that does not qualify under the 95% or 75% income tests unless certain technical requirements are met.
For taxable years beginning in 2005, the 2004 Act exempts from the 95% REIT income test, income of a REIT arising from "clearly identified" hedging transactions that are entered into to manage the risk of interest rate or price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings, including gain from the disposition of such hedging transactions, to the extent the hedging transactions hedge indebtedness incurred, or to be incurred, by the REIT to acquire or carry real estate assets. In general, for a hedging transaction to be "clearly identified," (a) it must be identified as a hedging transaction before the end of the day on which it is acquired or entered into, and (b) the items or risks being hedged must be identified "substantially contemporaneously" with entering into the hedging transaction (generally, not more than 35 days after entering into the hedging transaction).
117
We intend to structure any hedging transactions in a manner that does not jeopardize our status as a REIT. We may conduct some or all of our hedging activities (including hedging activities relating to currency risk) through a taxable REIT subsidiary or other corporate entity, the income from which may be subject to federal income tax, rather than participating in the arrangements directly. No assurance can be given, however, that our hedging activities will not give rise to income that does not qualify for purposes of either or both of the REIT income tests, and will not adversely affect our ability to satisfy the REIT qualification requirements.
Prior to the making of investments in properties, we may invest the net offering proceeds in liquid assets such as government securities or certificates of deposit or preferred securities of other REITs. For purposes of the 75% Income Test, income attributable to a stock or debt instrument purchased with the proceeds received by a REIT in exchange for stock in the REIT (other than amounts received pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan) constitutes qualified temporary investment income if such income is received or accrued during the one-year period beginning on the date the REIT receives such new capital. To the extent that we hold any proceeds of the offering for longer than one year, we may invest those amounts in less liquid investments such as mortgage-backed securities, maturing mortgage loans purchased from mortgage lenders or shares in other REITs in order to satisfy the 75% Income and the 95% Income Tests and the Asset Tests described below. We expect the bulk of the remainder of our income to qualify under the 75% Income and 95% Income Tests as rents from real property in accordance with the requirements described above. In this regard, we anticipate that most of our leases will be for fixed rentals with annual "consumer price index" or similar adjustments and that none of the rentals under our leases will be based on the income or profits of any person. In addition, none of our customers are expected to be Related Party Customers and the portion of the rent attributable to personal property is not expected to exceed 15% of the total rent to be received under any lease. Finally, we anticipate that all or most of the services to be performed with respect to our properties will be performed by our property manager and such services are expected to be those usually or customarily rendered in connection with the rental of real property and not rendered to the occupant of such property. In addition, we anticipate that any non-customary services will be provided by a taxable REIT subsidiary or, alternatively, by an independent contractor that is adequately compensated and from whom we derive no income. However, we can give no assurance that the actual sources of our gross income will allow us to satisfy the 75% Income and the 95% Income Tests described above.
Notwithstanding our failure to satisfy one or both of the 75% Income and the 95% Income Tests for any taxable year, we may still qualify as a REIT for that year if we are eligible for relief under specific provisions of the Code. These relief provisions generally will be available if:
It is not possible, however, to state whether, in all circumstances, we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. In addition, as discussed above in "Taxation of Dividend Capital Trust," even if these relief provisions apply, a tax would be imposed with respect to the excess net income.
Operational RequirementsAsset Tests
At the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we also must satisfy four tests ("Asset Tests") relating to the nature and diversification of our assets.
118
mortgages on real property, shares in other qualified REITs, property attributable to the temporary investment of new capital as described above and a proportionate share of any real estate assets owned by a partnership in which we are a partner or of any qualified REIT subsidiary of ours.
The Asset Tests must generally be met for any quarter in which we acquire securities or other property. Upon full investment of the net offering proceeds we expect that most of our assets will consist of real property and we therefore expect to satisfy the Asset Tests.
If we meet the Asset Tests at the close of any quarter, we will not lose our REIT status for a failure to satisfy the Asset Tests at the end of a later quarter in which we have not acquired any securities or other property if such failure occurs solely because of changes in asset values. If our failure to satisfy the Asset Tests results from an acquisition of securities or other property during a quarter, we can cure the failure by disposing of a sufficient amount of non-qualifying assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter. We intend to maintain adequate records of the value of our assets to ensure compliance with the Asset Tests and to take other action within 30 days after the close of any quarter as may be required to cure any noncompliance.
The 2004 Act contains a number of provisions applicable to REITs, including relief provisions, that make it easier for REITs to satisfy the asset requirements, or to maintain REIT qualification notwithstanding certain violations of the asset and other requirements. These provisions are generally effective beginning with our 2005 tax year, except as otherwise noted below.
One such provision applies to "de minimis" violations of the 10% and 5% asset tests. A REIT may maintain its qualification despite a violation of such requirements if (a) the value of the assets causing the violation does not exceed the lesser of 1% of the REIT's total assets, and $10,000,000, and (b) the REIT either disposes of the assets causing the failure within 6 months after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the failure, or the relevant tests are otherwise satisfied within that time frame.
A second relief provision contained in the 2004 Act allows a REIT which fails one or more of the asset requirements and is ineligible for relief under the de minimis rule to nevertheless maintain its REIT qualification if (a) it provides the IRS with a description of each asset causing the failure, (b) the failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, (c) the REIT pays a tax equal to the greater of (i) $50,000 per failure, and (ii) the product of the net income generated by the assets that caused the failure multiplied by the highest applicable corporate tax rate (currently 35%), and (d) the REIT
119
either disposes of the assets causing the failure within 6 months after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the failure, or otherwise satisfies the relevant asset tests within that time frame.
The 2004 Act also provides that certain securities will not cause a violation of the 10% value test described above. Such securities include instruments that constitute "straight debt," which now has an expanded definition and includes securities having certain contingency features. A newly enacted restriction, however, precludes a security from qualifying as "straight debt" where a REIT (or a controlled taxable REIT subsidiary of the REIT) owns other securities of the issuer of that security which do not qualify as straight debt, unless the value of those other securities constitute, in the aggregate, 1% or less of the total value of that issuer's outstanding securities. In addition to straight debt, the 2004 Act provides that certain other securities will not violate the 10% value test. Such securities include (a) any loan made to an individual or an estate, (b) certain rental agreements in which one or more payments are to be made in subsequent years (other than agreements between a REIT and certain persons related to the REIT), (c) any obligation to pay rents from real property, (d) securities issued by governmental entities that are not dependent in whole or in part on the profits of (or payments made by) a non-governmental entity, (e) any security issued by another REIT, and (f) any debt instrument issued by a partnership if the partnership's income is of a nature that it would satisfy the 75% gross income test described above under "Requirements for Qualification as a REITOperational RequirementsGross Income Tests." The 2004 Act also provides that in applying the 10% value test, a debt security issued by a partnership is not taken into account to the extent, if any, of the REIT's proportionate equity interest in that partnership. Each of the changes described in this paragraph that were made by the 2004 Act have retroactive effect beginning with the 2001 tax year.
To the extent that we fail one or more of the asset tests, and we do not fall within the de minimis safe harbors with respect to the 5% and 10% asset tests, we may nevertheless be deemed to have satisfied such requirements if (i) we take certain corrective measures, (ii) we meet certain technical requirements, and (iii) we pay a specified excise tax of $50,000.
Operational RequirementsAnnual Distribution Requirement
In order to be taxed as a REIT, we are required to make distributions, other than capital gain distributions, to our shareholders each year in the amount of at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the distributions paid deduction and our net capital gain and subject to certain other potential adjustments) for all tax years. While we must generally pay distributions in the taxable year to which they relate, we may also pay distributions in the following taxable year if (1) they are declared before we timely file our federal income tax return for the taxable year in question, and if (2) they are paid on or before the first regular distribution payment date after the declaration.
Even if we satisfy the foregoing distribution requirement and, accordingly, continue to qualify as a REIT for tax purposes, we will still be subject to federal income tax on the excess of our net capital gain and our REIT taxable income, as adjusted, over the amount of distributions to shareholders.
In addition, if we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of:
120
We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy this requirement; however, it is possible that we may experience timing differences between (1) the actual receipt of income and payment of deductible expenses, and (2) the inclusion of that income and deduction of those expenses for purposes of computing our taxable income. It is also possible that we may be allocated a share of net capital gain attributable to the sale of depreciated property by our operating partnership that exceeds our allocable share of cash attributable to that sale. In those circumstances, we may have less cash than is necessary to meet our annual distribution requirement or to avoid income or excise taxation on undistributed income. We may find it necessary in those circumstances to arrange for financing or raise funds through the issuance of additional shares in order to meet our distribution requirements. If we fail to satisfy the distribution requirement for any taxable year by reason of a later adjustment to our taxable income made by the Internal Revenue Service, we may be able to pay "deficiency dividends" in a later year and include such distributions in our deductions for distributions paid for the earlier year. In that event, we may be able to avoid losing our REIT status or being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends, but we would be required to pay interest and a penalty to the Internal Revenue Service based upon the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends for the earlier year.
As noted above, we may also elect to retain, rather than distribute, our net long-term capital gains. The effect of such an election would be as follows:
In computing our REIT taxable income, we will use the accrual method of accounting and intend to depreciate depreciable property under the alternative depreciation system. We are required to file an annual federal income tax return, which, like other corporate returns, is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service. Because the tax law requires us to make many judgments regarding the proper treatment of a transaction or an item of income or deduction, it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service will challenge positions we take in computing our REIT taxable income and our distributions.
Issues could arise, for example, with respect to the allocation of the purchase price of properties between depreciable or amortizable assets and non-depreciable or non-amortizable assets such as land and the current deductibility of fees paid to the Advisor or its affiliates. Were the Internal Revenue Service to successfully challenge our characterization of a transaction or determination of our REIT taxable income, we could be found to have failed to satisfy a requirement for qualification as a REIT. If, as a result of a challenge, we are determined to have failed to satisfy the distribution requirements for a taxable year, we would be disqualified as a REIT, unless we were permitted to pay a deficiency dividend to our shareholders and pay interest thereon to the Internal Revenue Service, as provided by the Code. A deficiency dividend cannot be used to satisfy the distribution requirement, however, if the failure to meet the requirement is not due to a later adjustment to our income by the Internal Revenue Service.
Operational RequirementsRecordkeeping
We must maintain certain records as set forth in Treasury Regulations in order to avoid the payment of monetary penalties to the Internal Revenue Service. Such Treasury Regulations require that
121
we request, on an annual basis, certain information designed to disclose the ownership of our outstanding shares. We intend to comply with these requirements.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT for any reason in a taxable year and applicable relief provisions do not apply, we will be subject to tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We will not be able to deduct distributions paid to our shareholders in any year in which we fail to qualify as a REIT. In this situation, to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and profits, all distributions to our shareholders that are individuals will generally be taxable at capital gains rates (through 2008), and, subject to limitations of the Code, corporate distributees may be eligible for the distributions received deduction. We also will be disqualified for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost unless we are entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions.
Some of our investments may be in the form of sale-leaseback transactions. We normally intend to treat these transactions as true leases for federal income tax purposes. However, depending on the terms of any specific transaction, the Internal Revenue Service might take the position that the transaction is not a true lease but is more properly treated in some other manner. If such re-characterization were successful, we would not be entitled to claim the depreciation deductions available to an owner of the property. In addition, the re-characterization of one or more of these transactions might cause us to fail to satisfy the Asset Tests or the Income Tests described above based upon the asset we would be treated as holding or the income we would be treated as having earned and such failure could result in our failing to qualify as a REIT. Alternatively, the amount or timing of income inclusion or the loss of depreciation deductions resulting from the re-characterization might cause us to fail to meet the distribution requirement described above for one or more taxable years absent the availability of the deficiency distribution procedure or might result in a larger portion of our distributions being treated as ordinary distribution income to our shareholders.
Taxation of Taxable U.S. Shareholders
Definition
In this section, the phrase "U.S. shareholder" means a holder of our common stock that for federal income tax purposes is:
For any taxable year for which we qualify for taxation as a REIT, amounts distributed to, and gains realized by, taxable U.S. shareholders with respect to our common shares generally will be taxed as described below. For a summary of the federal income tax treatment of distributions reinvested in additional shares of our common stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, see "Description of SecuritiesDistribution Reinvestment Plan." For a summary of the federal income tax treatment of
122
shares redeemed by us under our share redemption program, see "Description of SecuritiesShare Redemption Program."
Distributions Generally
Distributions to U.S. shareholders, other than capital gain distributions discussed below, will constitute distributions up to the amount of our current or accumulated earnings and profits and will be taxable to the shareholders as ordinary income. These distributions are not eligible for the distributions received deduction generally available to corporations. In addition, with limited exceptions, these distributions are not eligible for taxation at the preferential income tax rates for qualified distributions received by individuals from taxable C corporations pursuant to the recently enacted Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. Shareholders that are individuals, however, are taxed at the preferential rates on distributions designated by and received from us to the extent that the distributions are attributable to (i) income retained by us in the prior taxable year on which we were subject to corporate level income tax (less the amount of tax), (ii) distributions received by us from taxable C corporations, or (iii) income in the prior taxable year from the sales of "built-in gain" property acquired by us from C corporations in carryover basis transactions (less the amount of corporate tax on such income).
To the extent that we make a distribution in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital, reducing the tax basis in the U.S. shareholder's shares, and the amount of each distribution in excess of a U.S. shareholder's tax basis in its shares will be taxable as gain realized from the sale of its shares. Distributions that we declare in October, November or December of any year payable to a shareholder of record on a specified date in any of these months will be treated as both paid by us and received by the shareholder on December 31 of the year, provided that we actually pay the distribution during January of the following calendar year. U.S. shareholders may not include any of our losses on their own federal income tax returns.
We will be treated as having sufficient earnings and profits to treat as a dividend any distribution by us up to the amount required to be distributed in order to avoid imposition of the 4% excise tax discussed above. Moreover, any "deficiency dividend" will be treated as an ordinary or capital gain distribution, as the case may be, regardless of our earnings and profits. As a result, shareholders may be required to treat as taxable some distributions that would otherwise result in a tax-free return of capital.
Capital Gain Distributions
Distributions to U.S. shareholders that we properly designate as capital gain distributions normally will be treated as long-term capital gains to the extent they do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year without regard to the period for which the U.S. shareholder has held his stock. A corporate U.S. shareholder might be required to treat up to 20% of some capital gain distributions as ordinary income. Long-term capital gains are generally taxable at maximum federal rates of 15% (through 2008) in the case of stockholders who are individuals, and 35% in the case of stockholders that are corporations. Capital gains attributable to the sale of depreciable real property held for more than 12 months are subject to a 25% maximum federal income tax rate for taxpayers who are individuals, to the extent of previously claimed depreciation deductions. See "Requirements for Qualification as a REITOperational RequirementsAnnual Distribution Requirement" for the treatment by U.S. shareholders of net long-term capital gains that we elect to retain and pay tax on.
123
Certain Dispositions of Our Common Shares
In general, capital gains recognized by individuals upon the sale or disposition of shares of our common stock will be subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 15% (from May 6, 2003 through 2008) if such stock is held for more than 12 months, and will be taxed at ordinary income rates (of up to 35% through 2010) if such stock is held for 12 months or less. Gains recognized by stockholders that are corporations are subject to federal income tax at a maximum rate of 35%, whether or not classified as long-term capital gains. Capital losses recognized by a stockholder upon the disposition of share of our common stock held for more than one year at the time of disposition will be considered long-term capital losses, and are generally available only to offset capital gain income of the stockholder but not ordinary income (except in the case of individuals, who may offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year). In addition, any loss upon a sale or exchange of shares of our common stock by a stockholder who has held such shares for six months or less, after applying holding period rules, will be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of distributions received from us that are required to be treated by the stockholder as long-term capital gain.
Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding for U.S. Shareholders
We will report to U.S. shareholders of our common shares and to the Internal Revenue Service the amount of distributions made or deemed made during each calendar year and the amount of tax withheld, if any. Under some circumstances, U.S. shareholders may be subject to backup withholding on payments made with respect to, or cash proceeds of a sale or exchange of, our common stock. Backup withholding will apply only if the shareholder:
Backup withholding will not apply with respect to payments made to some shareholders, such as corporations in certain circumstances and tax-exempt organizations. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup withholding with respect to a payment to a U.S. shareholder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. shareholder's United States federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. shareholder to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service. U.S. shareholders should consult their tax advisors regarding their qualification for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining an exemption.
Treatment of Tax-Exempt Shareholders
Tax-exempt entities including employee pension benefit trusts and individual retirement accounts generally are exempt from United States federal income taxation. These entities are subject to taxation, however, on any "unrelated business taxable income" ("UBTI"), as defined in the Code. The Internal Revenue Service has issued a published ruling that distributions from a REIT to a tax-exempt pension trust did not constitute UBTI. Although rulings are merely interpretations of law by the Internal Revenue Service and may be revoked or modified, based on this analysis, indebtedness incurred by us
124
or by our operating partnership in connection with the acquisition of a property should not cause any income derived from the property to be treated as UBTI upon the distribution of those amounts as dividends to a tax-exempt U.S. shareholder of our common shares. A tax-exempt entity that incurs indebtedness to finance its purchase of our common shares, however, will be subject to UBTI under the debt-financed income rules. However, social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans that are exempt from taxation under specified provisions of the Code are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally will require them to treat dividend distributions from us as UBTI. These organizations are urged to consult their own tax advisor with respect to the treatment of our distributions to them.
In addition, tax-exempt pension and specified other tax-exempt trusts that hold more than 10% by value of the shares of a REIT may be required to treat a specified percentage of REIT dividends as UBTI. This requirement applies only if our qualification as a REIT depends upon the application of a look-through exception to the closely-held restriction and we are considered to be predominantly held by those tax-exempt trusts. It is not anticipated that our qualification as a REIT will depend upon application of the look-through exception or that we will be predominantly held by these types of trusts.
Special Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Shareholders
The rules governing United States federal income taxation of non-resident alien individuals, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships and other foreign shareholders (collectively, "Non-U.S. holders") are complex. The following discussion is intended only as a summary of these rules. Non-U.S. holders should consult with their own tax advisors to determine the impact of United States federal, state and local income tax laws on an investment in our common stock, including any reporting requirements as well as the tax treatment of the investment under the tax laws of their home country.
Ordinary Dividends
The portion of distributions received by Non-U.S. holders payable out of our earnings and profits which are not attributable to our capital gains and which are not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. holder will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at the rate of 30%, unless reduced by treaty. In general, Non-U.S. holders will not be considered to be engaged in a U.S. trade or business solely as a result of their ownership of our common stock. In cases where the dividend income from a Non-U.S. holder's investment in our common stock is, or is treated as, effectively connected with the Non-U.S. holder's conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the Non-U.S. holder generally will be subject to U.S. tax at graduated rates, in the same manner as domestic stockholders are taxed with respect to such distributions, such income must generally be reported on a U.S. income tax return filed by or on behalf of the non-U.S. holder, and the income may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax in the case of a Non-U.S. holder that is a corporation.
Non-Dividend Distributions
Unless our common stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest (a "USRPI"), distributions by us which are not dividends out of our earnings and profits will not be subject to U.S. income tax. If it cannot be determined at the time at which a distribution is made whether or not the distribution will exceed current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be subject to withholding at the rate applicable to dividends. However, the Non-U.S. holder may seek a refund from the Internal Revenue Service of any amounts withheld if it is subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. If our common stock constitutes a USRPI, as described below, distributions by us in excess of the sum of our earnings and profits plus the shareholder's basis in our stock will be taxed under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 ("FIRPTA") at the rate of tax, including any applicable capital gains rates, that would apply to a
125
domestic stockholder of the same type (e.g., an individual or a corporation, as the case may be), and the collection of the tax will be enforced by a refundable withholding at a rate of 10% of the amount by which the distribution exceeds the stockholder's share of our earnings and profits.
Capital Gain Distributions
Under FIRPTA, a distribution made by us to a non-U.S. holder, to the extent attributable to gains from dispositions of USRPIs held by us directly or through pass-through subsidiaries ("USRPI capital gains"), will be considered effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. holder and will be subject to federal income tax at the rates applicable to U.S. individuals or corporations, without regard to whether the distribution is designated as a capital gain dividend. See above under "Special Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. StockholdersOrdinary Dividends" for a discussion of the consequences of income that is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business. In addition, we will be required to withhold tax equal to 35% of the amount of dividends to the extent the dividends constitute USRPI capital gains. Pursuant to the 2004 Act, a capital gain dividend paid by us that would otherwise have been treated as a USRPI capital gain will not be so treated or be subject to FIRPTA, will generally not be treated as income that is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, and will instead be treated the same as an ordinary dividend from us (see "Special Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. StockholdersOrdinary Dividends"), provided that (1) the capital gain dividend is received with respect to a class of stock that is regularly traded on an established securities market located in the United States, and (2) the recipient non-U.S. holder does not own more than 5% of that class of stock at any time during the taxable year in which the capital gain dividend is received. This provision of the 2004 Act is effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2004. We do not anticipate our shares satisfying the "regularly traded" requirement. Distributions subject to FIRPTA may also be subject to a 30% branch profits tax in the hands of a non-U.S. holder that is a corporation. A distribution is not a USRPI capital gain if we held the underlying asset solely as a creditor. Capital gain dividends received by a non-U.S. holder from a REIT that are not USRPI capital gains are generally not subject to U.S. income tax, but may be subject to withholding tax.
Dispositions of Our Common Stock
Unless our common stock constitutes a USRPI, a sale of our common stock by a non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. taxation under FIRPTA. Our common stock will not be treated as a USRPI if less than 50% of our assets throughout a prescribed testing period consist of interests in real property located within the United States, excluding, for this purpose, interests in real property solely in a capacity as a creditor.
Even if the foregoing test is not met, our common stock nonetheless will not constitute a USRPI if we are a "domestically controlled REIT." A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its shares is held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. holders. We currently anticipate that we will continue to be a domestically controlled REIT and, therefore, the sale of our common stock should not be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. However, we cannot assure you that we are or will continue to be a domestically controlled REIT. If we were not a domestically controlled REIT, whether a Non-U.S. holder's sale of our common stock would be subject to tax under FIRPTA as a sale of a United States real property interest would depend on whether our common stock were "regularly traded" on an established securities market and on the size of the selling shareholder's interest in us.
If the gain on the sale of shares were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, a Non-U.S. holder would be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. shareholder with respect to the gain, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of non-resident alien individuals. Gain from the sale of our common stock that would not otherwise be subject to FIRPTA will nonetheless be taxable in the United States to a non-U.S. holder in two cases: (a) if the
126
non-U.S. holder's investment in our common stock is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such non-U.S. holder, the non-U.S. holder will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain, or (b) if the non-U.S. holder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a "tax home" in the United States, the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual's capital gain.
Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding for Non-U.S. Shareholders
Non-U.S. shareholders should consult their tax advisors with regard to U.S. information reporting and backup withholding requirements under the Code.
We are required to demand annual written statements from the record holders of designated percentages of our common stock disclosing the actual owners of the shares. Any record shareholder who, upon our request, does not provide us with required information concerning actual ownership of the shares is required to include specified information relating to his shares in his federal income tax return. We also must maintain, within the Internal Revenue District in which we are required to file our federal income tax return, permanent records showing the information we have received about the actual ownership of our common stock and a list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with our demand.
Federal Income Tax Aspects of Our Partnership
The following discussion summarizes certain federal income tax considerations applicable to our investment in our operating partnership. The discussion does not cover state or local tax laws or any federal tax laws other than income tax laws.
Classification as a Partnership
We will be entitled to include in our income a distributive share of our operating partnership's income and to deduct our distributive share of our operating partnership's losses only if our operating partnership is classified for federal income tax purposes as a partnership, rather than as a corporation or an association taxable as a corporation. Under applicable Treasury Regulations (the "Check-the-Box-Regulations"), an unincorporated domestic entity with at least two members may elect to be classified either as an association taxable as a corporation or as a partnership. If the entity fails to make an election, it generally will be treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Our operating partnership intends to be classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes and will not elect to be treated as an association taxable as a corporation under the Check-the-Box-Regulations.
Even though our operating partnership will not elect to be treated as an association for Federal income tax purposes, it may be taxed as a corporation if it is deemed to be a "publicly traded partnership." A publicly traded partnership is a partnership whose interests are traded on an established securities market or are readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof. Under applicable Treasury regulations (the "PTP Regulations"), limited safe harbors from the definition of a publicly traded partnership are provided. Pursuant to one of those safe harbors (the "Private Placement Exclusion"), interests in a partnership will not be treated as readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof if (i) all interests in the partnership were issued in a transaction (or transactions) that were not required to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and (ii) the partnership does not have more than 100 partners at any time during the partnership's taxable year. In determining the number of partners in a partnership, a person owning an interest in a flow-through entity (including a partnership, grantor trust or S corporation) that
127
owns an interest in the partnership is treated as a partner in such partnership only if (a) substantially all of the value of the owner's interest in the flow-through entity is attributable to the flow-through entity's direct or indirect interest in the partnership, and (b) a principal purpose of the use of the flow-through entity is to permit the partnership to satisfy the 100 partner limitation. We and our operating partnership believe and currently intend to take the position that our operating partnership should not be classified as a publicly traded partnership because (i) DCX Units are not traded on an established securities market, and (ii) DCX Units should not be considered readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof. In addition, our operating partnership presently qualifies for the Private Placement Exclusion.
Even if our operating partnership were considered a publicly traded partnership under the PTP Regulations, the operating partnership should not be treated as a corporation for Federal income tax purposes as long as 90% or more of its gross income consists of "qualifying income" under section 7704(d) of the Code. In general, qualifying income includes interest, dividends, real property rents (as defined by section 856 of the Code) and gain from the sale or disposition of real property. If our operating partnership were characterized as a publicly traded partnership even if it were not taxable as a corporation because of the qualifying income exception, however, holders of DCX Units would be subject to special rules under section 469 of the Code. Under such rules, each holder of DCX Units would be required to treat any loss derived from the operating partnership separately from any income or loss derived from any other publicly traded partnership, as well as from income or loss derived from other passive activities. In such case, any net losses or credits attributable to the operating partnership which are carried forward may only be offset against future income of the operating partnership. Moreover, unlike other passive activity losses, suspended losses attributable to the operating partnership would only be allowed upon the complete disposition of the DCX Unit holder's "entire interest" in the operating partnership.
We have not requested, and do not intend to request, a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service that our operating partnership will be classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
If for any reason our operating partnership were taxable as a corporation, rather than a partnership, for federal income tax purposes, we would not be able to qualify as a REIT, unless we are eligible for relief from the violation pursuant to relief provisions described above. See "Requirements for Qualification as a REITOrganizational Requirements" and "Requirements for Qualification as a REITOperational RequirementsAsset Tests," above, for discussion of the effect of the failure to satisfy the REIT tests for a taxable year, and of the relief provisions. In addition, any change in our operating partnership's status for tax purposes might be treated as a taxable event, in which case we might incur a tax liability without any related cash distribution. Further, items of income and deduction of our operating partnership would not pass through to its partners, and its partners would be treated as shareholders for tax purposes. Our operating partnership would be required to pay income tax at corporate tax rates on its net income, and distributions to its partners would constitute dividends that would not be deductible in computing our operating partnership's taxable income.
Income Taxation of Our Operating Partnership and its Partners
Partners, Not Partnership, Subject to Tax. A partnership is not a taxable entity for federal income tax purposes. As a partner in our operating partnership, we will be required to take into account our allocable share of our operating partnership's income, gains, losses, deductions, and credits for any taxable year of our operating partnership ending within or with our taxable year, without regard to whether we have received or will receive any distributions from our operating partnership.
Partnership Allocations. Although a partnership agreement generally determines the allocation of income and losses among partners, such allocations will be disregarded for tax purposes under section 704(b) of the Code if they do not comply with the provisions of section 704(b) of the Code and
128
the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder. If an allocation is not recognized for federal income tax purposes, the item subject to the allocation will be reallocated in accordance with the partner's interests in the partnership, which will be determined by taking into account all of the facts and circumstances relating to the economic arrangement of the partners with respect to such item. Our operating partnership's allocations of taxable income and loss are intended to comply with the requirements of section 704(b) of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.
Tax Allocations With Respect to Contributed Properties. Pursuant to section 704(c) of the Code, income, gain, loss, and deduction attributable to appreciated or depreciated property that is contributed to a partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership must be allocated for federal income tax purposes in a manner such that the contributor is charged with, or benefits from, the unrealized gain or unrealized loss associated with the property at the time of the contribution. The amount of unrealized gain or unrealized loss is generally equal to the difference between the fair market value of the contributed property at the time of contribution and the adjusted tax basis of such property at the time of contribution. Under applicable Treasury Regulations, partnerships are required to use a "reasonable method" for allocating items subject to section 704(c) of the Code and several reasonable allocation methods are described therein.
Under the partnership agreement, subject to exceptions applicable to the special limited partnership interests, depreciation or amortization deductions of our operating partnership generally will be allocated among the partners in accordance with their respective interests in our operating partnership, except to the extent that our operating partnership is required under section 704(c) to use a different method for allocating depreciation deductions attributable to its properties. In addition, gain or loss on the sale of a property that has been contributed to our operating partnership will be specially allocated to the contributing partner to the extent of any built-in gain or loss with respect to the property for federal income tax purposes. It is possible that we may (1) be allocated lower amounts of depreciation deductions for tax purposes with respect to contributed properties than would be allocated to us if each such property were to have a tax basis equal to its fair market value at the time of contribution, and (2) be allocated taxable gain in the event of a sale of such contributed properties in excess of the economic profit allocated to us as a result of such sale. These allocations may cause us to recognize taxable income in excess of cash proceeds received by us, which might adversely affect our ability to comply with the REIT distribution requirements, although we do not anticipate that this event will occur. The foregoing principles also will affect the calculation of our earnings and profits for purposes of determining the portion of our distributions that are taxable as a dividend. The allocations described in this paragraph may result in a higher portion of our distributions being taxed as a dividend than would have occurred had we purchased such properties for cash.
Basis in Partnership Interest. The adjusted tax basis of our partnership interest in our operating partnership generally will be equal to (1) the amount of cash and the basis of any other property contributed to our operating partnership by us, (2) increased by (A) our allocable share of our operating partnership's income and (B) our allocable share of indebtedness of our operating partnership, and (3) reduced, but not below zero, by (A) our allocable share of our operating partnership's loss and (B) the amount of cash distributed to us, including constructive cash distributions resulting from a reduction in our share of indebtedness of our operating partnership. If the allocation of our distributive share of our operating partnership's loss would reduce the adjusted tax basis of our partnership interest in our operating partnership below zero, the recognition of the loss will be deferred until such time as the recognition of the loss would not reduce our adjusted tax basis below zero. If a distribution from our operating partnership or a reduction in our share of our operating partnership's liabilities would reduce our adjusted tax basis below zero, that distribution, including a constructive distribution, will constitute taxable income to us. The gain realized by us upon the receipt of any such distribution or constructive distribution would normally be characterized as capital gain, and if our
129
partnership interest in our operating partnership has been held for longer than the long-term capital gain holding period (currently one year), the distribution would constitute long-term capital gain.
Depreciation Deductions Available to Our Operating Partnership. Our operating partnership will use a portion of contributions made by Dividend Capital Trust from net offering proceeds to acquire interests in properties. To the extent that our operating partnership acquires properties for cash, our operating partnership's initial basis in such properties for federal income tax purposes generally will be equal to the purchase price paid by our operating partnership. Our operating partnership plans to depreciate each depreciable property for federal income tax purposes under the alternative depreciation system of depreciation ("ADS"). Under ADS, our operating partnership generally will depreciate buildings and improvements over a 40-year recovery period using a straight-line method and a mid-month convention and will depreciate furnishings and equipment over a 12-year recovery period. To the extent that our operating partnership acquires properties in exchange for units of our operating partnership, our operating partnership's initial basis in each such property for federal income tax purposes should be the same as the transferor's basis in that property on the date of acquisition by our operating partnership. Although the law is not entirely clear, our operating partnership generally intends to depreciate such depreciable property for federal income tax purposes over the same remaining useful lives and under the same methods used by the transferors.
Sale of Our Operating Partnership's Property. Generally, any gain realized by our operating partnership on the sale of property held for more than one year will be long-term capital gain, except for any portion of such gain that is treated as depreciation or cost recovery recapture. Our share of any gain realized by our operating partnership on the sale of any property held by our operating partnership as inventory or other property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our operating partnership's trade or business will be treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is subject to a 100% tax. We, however, do not presently intend to acquire or hold or allow our operating partnership to acquire or hold any property that represents inventory or other property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of our or our operating partnership's trade or business.
Legislative or Other Actions Affecting REITs
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 contains a number of provisions that affect the tax treatment of REITs and their stockholders. As discussed above, the 2004 Act includes provisions that generally ease compliance with certain REIT asset requirements, with the REIT 95% gross income requirement (in connection with income from hedging activities), and which grant relief in cases involving violations of the REIT asset and other requirements, provided that specified conditions are met. See "Requirements for Qualification as a REITOrganizational Requirements," "Requirements for Qualification as a REITOperational RequirementsAsset Tests" and "Requirements for Qualification as a REITOperational RequirementsGross Income Tests." The 2004 Act also alters the tax treatment of capital gain dividends received by foreign stockholders in some cases. See "Special Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. StockholdersCapital Gain Distributions." These changes are generally effective beginning in 2005, except that the provisions relating to the 10% asset (value) requirement have retroactive effect to 2001.
The recently enacted Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 reduced the maximum tax rates at which individuals are taxed on capital gains from 20% to 15% (from May 6, 2003 through 2008) and on dividends payable by taxable C corporations from 38.6% to 15% (from January 1, 2003 through 2008). While gains from the sale of the stock of REITs are eligible for the reduced tax rates, dividends payable by REITs are not eligible for the reduced tax rates except in limited circumstances. See "Taxation of Taxable U.S. ShareholdersDistributions Generally." As a
130
result, dividends received from REITs generally will continue to be taxed at ordinary income rates (now at a maximum rate of 35% through 2010). The more favorable tax rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause investors who are individuals to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our stock.
In addition, recent revenue proposals, if enacted, would amend Section 163(j) of the Code to limit the ability of a taxable REIT subsidiary to deduct interest paid to its parent REIT in excess the limitations currently in effect.
The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department. No assurance can be given as to whether, or in what form, the proposal described above (or any other proposals affecting REITs or their stockholders) will be enacted. Changes to the federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could adversely affect an investment in our stock.
State and Local Taxation
We and any operating subsidiaries we may form may be subject to state and local tax in states and localities in which we or they do business or own property. The tax treatment of Dividend Capital Trust, our operating partnership, any operating subsidiaries, joint ventures or other arrangements we or our operating partnership may form or enter into and the tax treatment of the holders of our common stock in local jurisdictions may differ from the federal income tax treatment described above. Consequently, prospective shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect of state and local tax laws on their investment in our common stock.
131
The following is a summary of some non-tax considerations associated with an investment in our common stock by a qualified employee pension benefit plan or an IRA. This summary is based on provisions of ERISA and the Code, as amended through the date of this prospectus, and relevant regulations and opinions issued by the Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service. We cannot assure you that adverse tax decisions or legislative, regulatory or administrative changes which would significantly modify the statements expressed herein will not occur. Any such changes may or may not apply to transactions entered into prior to the date of their enactment. Each fiduciary of an employee pension benefit plan subject to ERISA, such as a profit sharing, section 401(k) or pension plan, or of any other retirement plan or account subject to Section 4975 of the Code, such as an IRA (collectively, Benefit Plans), seeking to invest plan assets in our common stock must, taking into account the facts and circumstances of such Benefit Plan, consider, among other matters:
Under ERISA, a plan fiduciary's responsibilities include the following duties:
ERISA also requires that the assets of an employee benefit plan be held in trust and that the trustee, or a duly authorized named fiduciary or investment manager, have exclusive authority and discretion to manage and control the assets of the plan. Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code prohibit specified transactions involving the assets of a Benefit Plan which are between the plan and any "party in interest" or "disqualified person" with respect to that Benefit Plan. These transactions are prohibited regardless of how beneficial they may be for the Benefit Plan. Prohibited transactions include the sale, exchange or leasing of property, the lending of money or the extension of credit between a Benefit Plan and a party in interest or disqualified person, and the transfer to, or use by, or for the benefit of, a party in interest, or disqualified person, of any assets of a Benefit Plan. A fiduciary of a Benefit Plan also is prohibited from engaging in self-dealing, acting for a person who has an interest adverse to the plan or receiving any consideration for its own account from a party dealing with the plan in a transaction involving plan assets. Furthermore, Section 408 of the Code states that assets of an IRA trust may not be commingled with other property except in a common trust fund or common investment fund.
In order to determine whether an investment in our common stock by Benefit Plans creates or gives rise to the potential for either prohibited transactions or the commingling of assets referred to
132
above, a fiduciary must consider whether an investment in our common stock will cause our assets to be treated as assets of the investing Benefit Plans. Neither ERISA nor the Code define the term "plan assets"; however, U.S. Department of Labor Regulations provide guidelines as to whether, and under what circumstances, the underlying assets of an entity will be deemed to constitute assets of a Benefit Plan when the plan invests in that entity (the Plan Assets Regulation). Under the Plan Assets Regulation, the assets of corporations, partnerships or other entities in which a Benefit Plan makes an equity investment will generally be deemed to be assets of the Benefit Plan unless the entity satisfies one of the exceptions to this general rule.
In the event that our underlying assets were treated by the Department of Labor as the assets of investing Benefit Plans, then, among other adverse results, our management would be treated as fiduciaries with respect to each Benefit Plan shareholder, and an investment in our common stock might constitute an ineffective delegation of fiduciary responsibility to the Advisor, and expose the fiduciary of the Benefit Plan to co-fiduciary liability under ERISA for any breach by the Advisor of the fiduciary duties mandated under ERISA. Further, as another example, if our assets are deemed to be "plan assets," an investment by an IRA in our common stock might be deemed to result in an impermissible commingling of IRA assets with other property.
If the Advisor or affiliates of the Advisor were treated as fiduciaries with respect to Benefit Plan shareholders, the prohibited transaction restrictions of ERISA and the Code would apply to any transaction involving our assets. These restrictions could, for example, require that we avoid transactions with entities that are affiliated with us or our affiliates or restructure our activities in order to obtain an administrative exemption from the prohibited transaction restrictions. We might have to provide Benefit Plan shareholders with the opportunity to sell their shares to us or we might dissolve or terminate. If a prohibited transaction were to occur, the Code imposes an excise tax equal to 15% of the amount involved and authorizes the Internal Revenue Service to impose an additional 100% excise tax if the prohibited transaction is not "corrected." These taxes would be imposed on any disqualified person who participates in the prohibited transaction. In addition, the Advisor and possibly other fiduciaries of Benefit Plan shareholders subject to ERISA who permitted the prohibited transaction to occur or who otherwise breached their fiduciary responsibilities, or a non-fiduciary participating in a prohibited transaction, could be required to restore to the Benefit Plan any profits they realized as a result of the transaction or breach, and make good to the Benefit Plan any losses incurred by the Benefit Plan as a result of the transaction or breach. With respect to an IRA that invests in our common stock, the occurrence of a prohibited transaction involving the individual who established the IRA, or his or her beneficiary, would cause the IRA to lose its tax-exempt status under Section 408(e)(2) of the Code.
The Plan Assets Regulation provides that the underlying assets of REITs will not be treated as assets of a Benefit Plan investing therein if the interest the Benefit Plan acquires is a "publicly-offered security." A publicly-offered security must be:
Our common stock is being sold as part of an offering of securities to the public pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, and is part of a class registered under the
133
Securities Exchange Act. In addition, we have over 100 independent shareholders as of the date of this prospectus. Whether a security is "freely transferable" depends upon the particular facts and circumstances. Our common stock is subject to certain restrictions on transferability intended to ensure that we continue to qualify for federal income tax treatment as a REIT. The regulation provides, however, that where the minimum investment in a public offering of securities is $10,000 or less, the presence of a restriction on transferability intended to prohibit transfers which would result in a termination or reclassification of the entity for state or federal tax purposes will not ordinarily affect a determination that such securities are freely transferable. The minimum investment in our common stock is less than $10,000.
If our common stock is "widely held" and assuming that no other facts and circumstances other than those referred to in the preceding paragraph exist that restrict transferability of our common stock and the offering takes place as described in this prospectus, our common stock would constitute "publicly-offered securities" and, accordingly, it is more likely than not that our underlying assets would not be considered "plan assets" under the Plan Assets Regulation.
Regardless of whether the shares qualify for the "publicly-offered security" exception of the Plan Assets Regulation, a prohibited transaction could occur if Dividend Capital Trust, the Advisor, any selected dealer or any of their affiliates is a fiduciary (within the meaning of Section 3(21) of ERISA) with respect to any Benefit Plan purchasing the shares. Accordingly, unless an administrative or statutory exemption applies, shares should not be purchased by a Benefit Plan with respect to which any of the above persons is a fiduciary. A person is a fiduciary with respect to a Benefit Plan under Section 3(21) of ERISA if, among other things, the person has discretionary authority or control with respect to "plan assets" or provides investment advice for a fee with respect to "plan assets." Under a regulation issued by the Department of Labor, a person shall be deemed to be providing investment advice if that person renders advice as to the advisability of investing in our common stock and that person regularly provides investment advice to the Benefit Plan pursuant to a mutual agreement or understanding (written or otherwise) (1) that the advice will serve as the primary basis for investment decisions, and (2) that the advice will be individualized for the Benefit Plan based on its particular needs.
A fiduciary of an employee benefit plan subject to ERISA is required to determine annually the fair market value of each asset of the plan as of the end of the plan's fiscal year and to file a report reflecting that value with the Department of Labor. When the fair market value of any particular asset is not available, the fiduciary is required to make a good faith determination of that asset's "fair market value" assuming an orderly liquidation at the time the determination is made. In addition, a trustee or custodian of an IRA must provide an IRA participant with a statement of the value of the IRA each year.
In discharging its obligation to value assets of a plan, a fiduciary subject to ERISA must act consistently with the relevant provisions of the plan and the general fiduciary standards of ERISA. Unless and until our common stock is listed on a national securities exchange or an over-the-counter market, it is not expected that a public market for the shares will develop. To date, neither the Internal Revenue Service nor the Department of Labor has promulgated regulations specifying how a plan fiduciary should determine the "fair market value" of the shares, namely when the fair market value of the shares is not determined in the marketplace. Therefore, to assist fiduciaries in fulfilling their valuation and annual reporting responsibilities with respect to ownership of shares, we intend to provide reports of our annual determinations of the current value of our net assets per outstanding share to those fiduciaries (including IRA trustees and custodians) who identify themselves to us and request the reports.
134
For so long as we are offering shares, we intend to use the most recent offering price as the per share net asset value. We will continue to use the most recent offering price as the per share net asset value until December 31st of the year following the year in which the most recently completed offering has expired unless a new offering has commenced prior to that time in which case we would use the new offering price. After that time, the value of the properties and our other assets will be based upon a valuation. Such valuation will be performed by a person independent of us and of our advisor.
We anticipate that we will provide annual reports of our determination of value (1) to IRA trustees and custodians not later than January 15 of each year, and (2) to other Benefit Plan fiduciaries within 75 days after the end of each calendar year. Each determination may be based upon valuation information available as of October 31 of the preceding year, up-dated, however, for any material changes occurring between October 31 and December 31. In connection with our 2004 annual report, we determined in accordance with the methodology described above that the per share net asset value was $10.50.
We intend to revise these valuation procedures to conform with any relevant guidelines that the Internal Revenue Service or the Department of Labor may hereafter issue. Meanwhile, we cannot assure you:
135
The following description of the shares is not complete but is a summary of portions of our articles of incorporation and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the articles of incorporation. Under our articles of incorporation, we have authority to issue a total of 500,000,000 shares of capital stock. Of the total shares authorized, 350,000,000 shares are designated as common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share, 50,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock, and 100,000,000 shares are designated as shares-in-trust, which would be issued only in the event that there is a purported transfer of, or other change in or affecting the ownership of, our common stock that would result in a violation of the ownership limits described below. As of March 31, 2005, approximately 81.3 million shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding, and no shares of preferred stock or shares-in-trust were issued and outstanding.
The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by shareholders, including election of our directors. Our articles of incorporation do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors. Therefore, the holders of a majority of the outstanding common shares can elect our entire board of directors. Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding series of preferred stock and to the distribution of specified amounts upon liquidation with respect to shares-in-trust, the holders of common stock are entitled to such distributions as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors out of legally available funds and, upon liquidation, are entitled to receive all assets available for distribution to shareholders. All shares issued in the offering will be fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock. Holders of shares of common stock will not have preemptive rights, which means that you will not have an automatic option to purchase any new shares that we issue.
We will not issue certificates for our common stock. Shares will be held in "uncertificated" form which will eliminate the physical handling and safekeeping responsibilities inherent in owning transferable stock certificates and eliminate the need to return a duly executed stock certificate to effect a transfer. Gemisys Financial Services Corp. acts as our registrar and as the transfer agent for our common stock. Transfers can be effected simply by mailing a transfer and assignment form, which we will provide to you at no charge, to:
Gemisys
Financial Services Corp.
7103 South Revere Parkway
Englewood, CO 80112
(303) 705-6000
Our articles of incorporation authorize our board of directors to designate and issue one or more classes or series of preferred stock without shareholder approval. The board of directors may determine the relative rights, preferences and privileges of each class or series of preferred stock so issued, which may be more beneficial than the rights, preferences and privileges attributable to the common stock. The issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of Dividend Capital Trust. Our board of directors has no present plans to issue preferred stock, but may do so at any time in the future without shareholder approval.
Meetings, Special Voting Requirements and Access to Records
An annual meeting of the shareholders will be held each year, at least 30 days after delivery of our annual report. Special meetings of shareholders may be called only upon the request of a majority of the directors, a majority of the independent directors, the chairman, the president or upon the written
136
request of shareholders holding at least 10% of the shares. The presence of a majority of the outstanding shares either in person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum. Generally, the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes entitled to be cast is necessary to take shareholder action authorized by our articles of incorporation, except that a majority of the votes represented in person or by proxy at a meeting at which a quorum is present is sufficient to elect a director.
Under the Maryland General Corporation Law and our articles of incorporation, shareholders are entitled to vote at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present on (1) amendment of our articles of incorporation, (2) liquidation or dissolution of Dividend Capital Trust, (3) reorganization of Dividend Capital Trust, (4) merger, consolidation or sale or other disposition of substantially all of our assets, and (5) revocation of our status as a REIT. Shareholders voting against any merger or sale of assets are permitted under the Maryland General Corporation Law to petition a court for the appraisal and payment of the fair value of their shares. In an appraisal proceeding, the court appoints appraisers who attempt to determine the fair value of the stock as of the date of the shareholder vote on the merger or sale of assets. After considering the appraisers' report, the court makes the final determination of the fair value to be paid to the dissenting shareholder and decides whether to award interest from the date of the merger or sale of assets and costs of the proceeding to the dissenting shareholders.
The Advisory Agreement, including the selection of the Advisor, is approved annually by our directors. While the shareholders do not have the ability to vote to replace the Advisor or to select a new advisor, shareholders do have the ability, by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on such matter, to elect to remove a director from our board. Shareholders are entitled to receive a copy of our shareholder list upon request. The list provided by us will include each shareholder's name, address and telephone number, if available, and number of shares owned by each shareholder and will be sent within ten days of the receipt by us of the request. A shareholder requesting a list will be required to pay reasonable costs of postage and duplication. We have the right to request that a requesting shareholder represent to us that the list will not be used to pursue commercial interests. In addition to the foregoing, shareholders have rights under Rule 14a-7 under the Securities Exchange Act, which provides that, upon the request of investors and the payment of the expenses of the distribution, we are required to distribute specific materials to shareholders in the context of the solicitation of proxies for voting on matters presented to shareholders or, at our option, provide requesting shareholders with a copy of the list of shareholders so that the requesting shareholders may make the distribution of proxies themselves.
Any shareholder shall be permitted access to all records of Dividend Capital Trust at all reasonable times, and may inspect and copy any of them for a reasonable copying charge. Inspection of our records by the office or agency administering the securities laws of a jurisdiction shall be provided upon reasonable notice and during normal business hours. An alphabetical list of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of our shareholders, along with the number of shares held by each of them, shall be maintained as part of the books and records of Dividend Capital Trust and shall be available for inspection by any shareholder or the shareholder's designated agent at the office of Dividend Capital Trust. The shareholder list shall be updated at least quarterly to reflect changes in the information contained therein. A copy of the list shall be mailed to any shareholder who requests the list within ten days of the request. Dividend Capital Trust may impose a reasonable charge for expenses incurred in reproducing the list. A shareholder may request a copy of the shareholder list in connection with matters relating to voting rights and the exercise of shareholder rights under federal proxy laws. If a proper request for the shareholder list is not honored, then the requesting shareholder shall be entitled to recover certain costs incurred in compelling the production of the list as well as actual damages suffered by reason of the refusal or failure to produce the list. However, a shareholder shall not have the right to secure the shareholder list or other information for the purpose of selling or using the list for a commercial purpose not related to the requesting shareholder's interest in our affairs.
137
Restriction on Ownership of Common Stock
In order for us to qualify as a REIT, beginning in 2003 not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares may be owned, directly or indirectly through the application of certain attribution rules under the Code, by any five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code to include specified entities, during the last half of any taxable year. In addition, the outstanding shares must be owned by 100 or more persons independent of us and each other during at least 335 days of a 12-month taxable year or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year, excluding our first taxable year ending December 31, 2002. In addition, we must meet requirements regarding the nature of our gross income in order to qualify as a REIT. One of these requirements is that at least 75% of our gross income for each calendar year must consist of rents from real property and income from other real property investments. The rents received by our operating partnership from any customer will not qualify as rents from real property, which could result in our loss of REIT status, if we own, actually or constructively within the meaning of certain provisions of the Code, 10% or more of the ownership interests in that customer. In order to assist us in preserving our status as a REIT, our articles of incorporation contain limitations on ownership and transfer of shares which prohibit any person or entity from owning or acquiring, directly or indirectly, more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of any class or series of our stock, prohibit the beneficial ownership of our outstanding shares by fewer than 100 persons and prohibit any transfer of or other event or transaction with respect to our common stock that would result in the beneficial ownership of our outstanding shares by fewer than 100 persons. In addition, our articles of incorporation prohibit any transfer of or other event with respect to our common stock that would cause us to violate the Closely Held Test, that would cause us to own, actually or constructively, 9.9% or more of the ownership interests in a customer of our real property or the real property of our operating partnership or any direct or indirect subsidiary of our operating partnership or that would otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT. Our articles of incorporation provide that any transfer of shares that would violate our share ownership limitations is null and void and the intended transferee will acquire no rights in such shares, unless, in the case of a transfer that would cause a violation of the 9.8% ownership limit, the transfer is approved by the board of directors based upon receipt of information that such transfer would not violate the provisions of the Code for qualification as a REIT.
The shares that, if transferred, would result in a violation of any applicable ownership limit notwithstanding the provisions described above which are attempted to be transferred will be exchanged for "shares-in-trust" and will be transferred automatically to a trust effective on the day before the purported transfer of such shares. We will designate a trustee of the share trust that will not be affiliated with us or the purported transferee or record holder. We will also name a charitable organization as beneficiary of the share trust. Shares-in-trust will remain issued and outstanding shares. The trustee will receive all dividends and distributions on the shares-in-trust and will hold such distributions or distributions in trust for the benefit of the beneficiary. The trustee also will vote the shares-in-trust.
The trustee will transfer the shares-in-trust to a person whose ownership of our common stock will not violate the ownership limits. The transfer shall be made no earlier than 20 days after the later of our receipt of notice that shares have been transferred to the trust or the date we determine that a purported transfer of our common stock has occurred. During this 20-day period, we will have the option of redeeming such shares. Upon any such transfer or redemption, the purported transferee or holder shall receive a per share price equal to the lesser of (a) the price per share in the transaction that created such shares-in-trust (or, in the case of a gift or devise, the market price at the time of the gift or devise), and (b) the market price per share on the date of the redemption, in the case of a purchase by us, or the price received by the trustee net of any sales commissions and expenses, in the case of a sale by the trustee. The charitable beneficiary will receive any excess amounts. In the case of a liquidation, holders of shares-in-trust will receive a ratable amount of our remaining assets available
138
for distribution to shares of the applicable class or series taking into account all shares-in-trust of such class or series. The trustee will distribute to the purported transferee or holder an amount equal to the lesser of the amounts received with respect to such shares-in-trust or the price per share in the transaction that created such shares-in-trust (or, in the case of a gift or devise, the market price at the time of the gift or devise) and shall distribute any remaining amounts to the charitable beneficiary.
Any person who (1) acquires or attempts to acquire shares in violation of the foregoing restrictions or who owns shares that were transferred to any such trust is required to give immediate written notice to Dividend Capital Trust of such event or (2) purports to transfer or receive shares subject to such limitations is required to give Dividend Capital Trust 15 days written notice prior to such purported transaction. In both cases, such persons shall provide to Dividend Capital Trust such other information as we may request in order to determine the effect, if any, of such event on our status as a REIT. The foregoing restrictions will continue to apply until (1) the board of directors determines it is no longer in the best interest of Dividend Capital Trust to continue to qualify as a REIT and (2) there is an affirmative vote of the majority of shares entitled to vote on such matter at a regular or special meeting of the shareholders of Dividend Capital Trust.
The ownership limits do not apply to a person or persons which the directors exempt from the ownership limit upon appropriate assurances that our qualification as a REIT is not jeopardized. Any person who owns 5% or more (or such lower percentage applicable under Treasury regulations) of the outstanding shares during any taxable year will be asked to deliver a statement or affidavit setting forth the number of shares beneficially owned.
We intend to declare and pay distributions on a quarterly basis. Distributions will be paid to investors who are shareholders as of the record dates selected by the directors. We currently calculate our quarterly distributions based upon daily record and distribution declaration dates so our shareholders will be entitled to be paid distributions beginning with the quarter in which their shares are purchased. We then make quarterly distribution payments following the end of each calendar quarter.
We are required to make distributions sufficient to satisfy the requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Generally, income distributed will not be taxable to us under the Code if we distribute at least 90% of our taxable income each year (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain). (See "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsRequirements for Qualification as a REITOperational RequirementsAnnual Distribution Requirement"). Distributions will be declared at the discretion of the board of directors, in accordance with our earnings, cash flow and general financial condition. The board's discretion will be directed, in substantial part, by its obligation to cause us to comply with the REIT requirements. Because we may receive income from interest or rents at various times during our fiscal year, distributions may not reflect our income earned in that particular distribution period and may be made in advance of actual receipt of funds in an attempt to make distributions relatively uniform. We are authorized to borrow money, issue new securities or sell assets in order to make distributions.
We are not prohibited from distributing our own securities in lieu of making cash distributions to shareholders, provided that the securities distributed to shareholders are readily marketable. The receipt of marketable securities in lieu of cash distributions may cause shareholders to incur transaction expenses in liquidating the securities. Distributions are declared by our board of directors and are
139
calculated on a daily basis. The following table sets forth the distributions declared by our board of directors and the distributions that have been paid to date:
Quarter |
Declared(1) |
Date Paid |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2nd Quarter2003 | $ | 0.1558 | July 15, 2003 | ||
3rd Quarter2003 | $ | 0.1575 | October 15, 2003 | ||
4th Quarter2003 | $ | 0.1575 | January 15, 2004 | ||
1st Quarter2004 | $ | 0.1591 | April 15, 2004 | ||
2nd Quarter2004 | $ | 0.1591 | July 15, 2004 | ||
3rd Quarter2004 | $ | 0.1609 | October 15, 2004 | ||
4th Quarter2004 | $ | 0.1609 | January 18, 2005 | ||
1st Quarter2005 | $ | 0.1574 | April 15, 2005 | ||
2nd Quarter2005 | $ | 0.1591 | July 15, 2005(2) |
In December 2004, our board of directors set the 2005 distribution level at $0.64 per share. The distribution was set by our board of directors at an amount we believe to be appropriate and sustainable based upon the evaluation of existing assets within our portfolio, anticipated future acquisition levels and projected future levels of additional capital to be raised. The short term dilution of operating results brought about by the pace our capital raising has met or exceeded the pace at which we have deployed capital during the initial stages of our existence was anticipated and is a byproduct of the continued effort to build a high-quality portfolio. Our objectives include paying shareholder distributions exclusively from our funds from operations over time. A component of the strategy to achieve this objective is to continue to build a high-quality portfolio of assets and to continue to add leverage to our balance sheet that is accretive to shareholder earnings.
Our board of directors declared distributions totaling approximately $11.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005. To fund total distributions, we utilized a combination of funds from operations and debt proceeds.
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
We currently have a distribution reinvestment plan available that allows you to have cash otherwise distributable to you invested in additional shares of Dividend Capital Trust at a discounted purchase price. You may purchase shares under the distribution reinvestment plan for an amount per share equal to the current offering price of the share on the relevant distribution date less a 5% discount. Shares issued pursuant to the Distribution Reinvestment Plan will be subject to a one-time 1.0% service fee payable to the Dealer Manager, which may be re-allowed to participating broker-dealers. Shares may be issued under this plan until all of the shares registered as part of this offering have been sold. Until there is more than a de minimus amount of trading in our common stock, the fair market value of our common stock purchased from us under the distribution reinvestment plan will be the same as the price of a share in this offering. After that time, our board will estimate the fair market value of our common stock by reference to the applicable sales price in respect of the most recent trades occurring on or prior to the relevant distribution date. After all the shares registered as part of this offering have been sold, we may purchase shares either through purchases on the open market, if a market then exists, or through an additional issuance of shares. In either case, the price per share will be equal to the then-prevailing market price, which shall equal the price on the securities exchange or an over-the-counter market on which such shares are listed at the date of purchase if such shares are then listed. A copy of our Distribution Reinvestment Plan is included as Appendix B to this prospectus. You may elect to participate in the distribution reinvestment plan by completing the Subscription
140
Agreement, the enrollment form or by other written notice to the plan administrator. Participation in the plan will begin with the next distribution made after receipt of your written notice. We may terminate the distribution reinvestment plan for any reason at any time upon 10 days' prior written notice to participants.
If you hold limited partnership interests in our operating partnership, such as DCX Units, you may also participate in the distribution reinvestment plan and have cash otherwise distributable to you by our operating partnership invested in our common stock at a discount equal to 5% of the current offering price of our common stock.
Your participation in the plan will also be terminated to the extent that a reinvestment of your distributions in our common stock would cause the share ownership limitations contained in our articles of incorporation to be violated.
If you elect to participate in the distribution reinvestment plan and are subject to United States federal income taxation, you will incur a tax liability on an amount equal to the fair market value on the relevant distribution date of the shares of our stock purchased with reinvested distributions, even though you have elected not to receive the distributions used to purchase those shares in cash. Under present law, the United States federal income tax treatment of that amount will be as described with respect to distributions under "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsTaxation of Taxable U.S. Shareholders" in the case of a taxable U.S. shareholder (as defined therein) and as described under "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsSpecial Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. Shareholders" in the case of a Non-U.S. Shareholder (as defined therein). However, the tax consequences to you of participating in our distribution reinvestment plan will vary depending upon your particular circumstances and you are urged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the specific tax consequences to you of participation in the plan.
As long as our common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or traded on an over-the-counter market, shareholders of Dividend Capital Trust who have held their shares for at least one year may be able to redeem all or any portion of their shares in accordance with the procedures outlined in the prospectus relating to the shares they purchased. At that time, we may, subject to the conditions and limitations described below, redeem the shares presented for redemption for cash to the extent that we have sufficient funds available to us to fund such redemption.
The amount received from the redemption of shares issued pursuant to this prospectus, will be equal to a percentage of the price actually paid for the shares, which percentage is dependent upon the number of years the shares are held, as described in the following table:
Share Purchase Anniversary |
Redemption Price as a Percent of Purchase Price* |
||
---|---|---|---|
Less than 1 | No Redemption Allowed | ||
1 | 92.5 | % | |
2 | 95.0 | % | |
3 | 97.5 | % | |
4 | 100.0 | % |
In the event that you are redeeming all of your shares, shares purchased pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan may be excluded from the foregoing one-year holding period requirement, in the discretion of the board of directors. In addition, for purposes of the one-year
141
holding period, limited partners of our operating partnership who redeem their limited partnership units for shares in Dividend Capital Trust shall be deemed to have owned their shares as of the date they were issued their limited partnership units in our operating partnership.
Our board of directors reserves the right in its sole discretion at any time and from time to time to (1) waive the one-year holding period in the event of the death or bankruptcy of a shareholder or other exigent circumstances or (2) suspend or terminate our redemption program.
Subject to the foregoing, each quarter we will determine how many, if any, shares will be redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program. The redemption date for each quarter is the last business day of that quarter and written requests for redemption must be received by us at least 30 days before the redemption date in order for us to redeem the shares that quarter. In the event we determine to redeem shares, we will honor redemption requests received on a pro rata basis. Any shareholder may withdraw a redemption request upon written notice to us before the date of redemption. During any calendar year we presently intend to limit the number of shares redeemed pursuant to our share redemption program to the lesser of: (1) three percent (3.0%) of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year; and (2) that number of shares we can redeem with the proceeds we receive from the sale of shares under our distribution reinvestment plan. In either case, the aggregate amount of redemptions under our share redemption program is not expected to exceed aggregate proceeds received from the sale of shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. The board of directors, in its sole discretion, may choose to use other sources of funds to redeem shares.
In addition, shares of our common stock contain a death put whereby upon the death of a shareholder, the shareholder's estate or trustee may put the shares to us for the lesser of the price paid for the shares or the share redemption price pursuant to the table above. In either case, the shares become redeemable, subject to the limitations described above, upon the death of the shareholder regardless of share purchase anniversary.
We cannot guarantee all or any redemption requests will be accommodated in any year. If we are unable to accommodate your request you can (1) withdraw your request for redemption, or (2) ask that we honor your request at such time, if any, when we determine to redeem shares. These pending requests, along with any other redemption requests, will be considered on a pro rata basis on the next redemption date.
The share redemption program is only intended to provide possible interim liquidity for shareholders until a secondary market develops for the shares, at which time the program will terminate. No such market presently exists, and we cannot assure you that any market for your shares will ever develop.
The shares we purchase under the share redemption program will be cancelled, and will have the status of authorized, but unissued shares. We will not reissue such shares unless they are first registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") under the Securities Act of 1933 and under appropriate state securities laws or otherwise issued in compliance with such laws. If we terminate, reduce the scope of or otherwise change the share redemption program, we will disclose the changes in reports filed with the Commission.
The federal income tax treatment of shareholders whose shares are redeemed by us under the share redemption program will depend on whether our redemption is treated as a payment in exchange for the shares. A redemption normally will be treated as an exchange if the redemption results in a complete termination of the shareholder's interest in our company, qualifies as "substantially disproportionate" with respect to the shareholder or is treated as "not essentially equivalent to a distribution" with respect to the shareholder. In order for the redemption to be substantially disproportionate, the percentage of our voting shares considered owned by the shareholder immediately
142
after the redemption must be less than 80 percent of the percentage of our voting shares considered owned by the shareholder immediately before the redemption. In order for the redemption to be treated as not essentially equivalent to a distribution with respect to the shareholder, the redemption must result in a "meaningful reduction" in the shareholder's interest in our company. The Internal Revenue Service has indicated in a published ruling that, in the case of a small minority holder of a publicly held corporation whose relative stock interest is minimal and who exercises no control over corporate affairs, a reduction in the holder's proportionate interest in the corporation from .0001118% to .0001081% would constitute a meaningful reduction. In determining whether any of these tests have been met, shares considered to be owned by the shareholder by reason of applicable constructive ownership rules, as well as the shares actually owned by the shareholder, normally will be taken into account.
In general, if the redemption is treated as an exchange, the United States federal income tax treatment of the redemption under present law will be as described under "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsTaxation of Taxable U.S. ShareholdersCertain Dispositions of Our Common Shares" in the case of a taxable U.S. shareholder (as defined therein) and as described under "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsSpecial Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. ShareholdersDispositions of Our Common Stock" in the case of a Non-U.S. shareholder (as defined therein) whose income derived from the investment in our common stock is not effectively connected with the Non-U.S. shareholder's conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If the redemption does not qualify as an exchange of our common stock, the United States federal income tax treatment of the redemption under present law generally will be as described under "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsTaxation of Taxable U.S. ShareholdersDistributions Generally" in the case of a taxable U.S. shareholder and as described under "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsSpecial Tax Considerations for Non-U.S. ShareholdersDispositions of Our Common Stock" in the case of a Non-U.S. shareholder whose income derived from the investment in our common stock is not effectively connected with the Non-U.S. shareholder's conduct of a trade or business in the United States. However, the tax consequences to you of participating in our share redemption program will vary depending upon your particular circumstances and you are urged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the specific tax consequences to you of participation in the share redemption program.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, we redeemed 214,287 shares of our common stock pursuant to our share redemption program. Such shares were redeemed at an average price of $9.82 per share for a total redemption price of $2.1 million. There were no redemptions or our common stock in 2003 and 2002.
There is no established public trading market for our common stock. This prospectus provides for the sale of our common stock to the public at a price per share of $10.50. As of May 31, 2005, there were approximately 23,000 shareholders of record.
In order for NASD members and their associated persons to participate in the offering and sale of shares of common stock pursuant to this offering or to participate in any future offering of our shares, we are required pursuant to NASD Rule 2710(c)(6) to disclose in each annual report distributed to shareholders a per share estimated value of the shares, the method by which it was developed and the date of the data used to develop the estimated value. In addition, our advisor must prepare annual statements of estimated share values to assist fiduciaries of retirement plans subject to the annual reporting requirements of ERISA in the preparation of their reports relating to an investment in our shares. For these purposes, the estimated value of the shares was deemed to be $10.50 per share as of December 31, 2004. The basis for this valuation is the fact that we conducted our third public offering of our shares at the price of $10.50 per share to third party investors through arms-length transactions. However, there is no significant public trading market for the shares at this time, and there can be no
143
assurance that stockholders could receive $10.50 per share if such a market did exist and they sold their shares or that they will be able to receive such amount for their shares in the future. Moreover, we have not performed an appraisal of our properties; as such, this valuation is not necessarily based upon the appraised value of our properties, nor does it necessarily represent the amount shareholders would receive if our properties were sold and the proceeds distributed to our shareholders in a liquidation, which amount may be less than $10.50 per share, because at the time we were purchasing our properties, the amount of funds available for investment in properties was reduced by selling commissions and dealer manager fees, organization and offering costs and acquisition and advisory fees and expenses, as described in more detail in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus. As a result, it would be expected that, in the absence of other factors affecting property values, our aggregate net asset value may be less than the proceeds of our offerings and may not be the best indicator of the value of shares purchased as a long term income producing investment. Upon conclusion of this offering, we may conduct additional public offerings of our common shares. Prior to providing a liquidity event for our shareholders, our board of directors will determine the public offering price of our shares of common stock for future public offerings, which may or may not be the same as the public offering price of our past and current public offerings.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Our Compensation Plans
The following table shows for our compensation plans and warrants as a group the number of our common shares to be issued upon exercise of options outstanding at December 31, 2004, the weighted average exercise price of these options and the number of our common shares remaining available for future issuance at December 31, 2004, excluding shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options.
Plan Category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) |
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | | | ||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(1) | 167,500 | $ | 11.36 | (2) | 3,082,500 | ||
Total | 167,500 | $ | 11.36 | 3,082,500 | |||
Under the Maryland General Corporation Law, business combinations between a Maryland corporation and an interested shareholder or the interested shareholder's affiliate are prohibited for
144
five years after the most recent date on which the shareholder becomes an interested shareholder. For this purpose, the term "business combinations" includes mergers, consolidations, share exchanges, asset transfers and issuances or reclassifications of equity securities. An "interested shareholder" is defined for this purpose as: (1) any person who beneficially owns ten percent or more of the voting power of the corporation's shares; or (2) an affiliate or associate of the corporation who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of ten percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding voting shares of the corporation.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination between the corporation and an interested shareholder generally must be recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least: (1) 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding voting shares of the corporation; and (2) two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting shares of the corporation other than shares held by the interested shareholder or its affiliate with whom the business combination is to be effected, or held by an affiliate or associate of the interested shareholder voting together as a single voting group.
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if the corporation's common shareholders receive a minimum price, as defined under the Maryland General Corporation Law, for their shares in the form of cash or other consideration in the same form as previously paid by the interested shareholder for its shares. None of these provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law will apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by the board of directors of the corporation prior to the time that the interested shareholder becomes an interested shareholder.
We have opted out of the business combination statute in our articles of incorporation. However, if we amended our articles of incorporation to opt into the statute, the statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of Dividend Capital Trust and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
The Maryland General Corporation Law provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquiror, or by officers or directors who are employees of the corporation are not entitled to vote on the matter. As permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, we have provided in our bylaws that the control share provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law will not apply to transactions involving Dividend Capital Trust, but the board of directors retains the discretion to change this provision in the future. "Control shares" are voting shares which, if aggregated with all other shares owned by the acquiror or with respect to which the acquiror has the right to vote or to direct the voting of, other than solely by virtue of revocable proxy, would entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of voting powers:
Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained shareholder approval. Except as otherwise specified in the statute, a "control share acquisition" means the acquisition of control shares. Once a person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition has undertaken to pay expenses and has satisfied other required conditions, the person may compel the board of directors to call a special meeting of shareholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the shares. If no
145
request for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any shareholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved for the control shares at the meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an "acquiring person statement" for the control shares as required by the statute, the corporation may redeem any or all of the control shares for their fair value, except for control shares for which voting rights have previously been approved. Fair value is to be determined for this purpose without regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares, and is to be determined as of the date of the last control share acquisition or of any meeting of shareholders at which the voting rights for control shares are considered and not approved.
If voting rights for control shares are approved at a shareholders meeting and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all other shareholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for purposes of these appraisal rights may not be less than the highest price per share paid in the control share acquisition. Some of the limitations and restrictions otherwise applicable to the exercise of dissenters' rights do not apply in the context of a control share acquisition.
The control share acquisition statute does not apply to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if the corporation is a party to the transaction or to acquisitions approved or exempted by the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation.
We have opted out of the control acquisition statute in our articles of incorporation. However, our articles of incorporation could be amended to opt into the statute.
146
Our operating partnership was formed in April 2002 to acquire, own and lease properties on our behalf. We utilize this Umbrella Partnership Real Estate Investment Trust ("UPREIT") structure generally to enable us to acquire real property in exchange for limited partnership interests in our operating partnership from owners who desire to defer taxable gain that would otherwise normally be recognized by them upon the disposition of their property or the transfer of their property to us in exchange for our common stock or cash. These owners may also desire to achieve diversity in their investment and other benefits afforded to owners of stock in a REIT. For purposes of satisfying the Asset and Income Tests for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the REIT's proportionate share of the assets and income of our operating partnership will be deemed to be assets and income of the REIT.
The property owner's goals are accomplished because the owner may contribute property to our operating partnership in exchange for limited partnership units on a tax deferred basis. Further, our operating partnership is structured to make distributions with respect to regular limited partnership units which are equivalent to the dividend distributions made to shareholders of Dividend Capital Trust. Finally, a limited partner in our operating partnership may later redeem his regular limited partnership units for shares of Dividend Capital Trust (in a taxable transaction) and, if our common stock is then listed, achieve liquidity for his investment.
We intend to hold substantially all of our assets in our operating partnership or in subsidiary entities in which our operating partnership owns an interest, and we intend to make future acquisitions of real properties using the UPREIT structure. Dividend Capital Trust is the sole general partner of our operating partnership. The Advisor and the parent of the Advisor have collectively contributed $201,000 to our operating partnership for certain limited partner interests. As the sole general partner of our operating partnership, we have the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of our operating partnership. We also own a substantial majority of the limited partnership interest of our operating partnership.
The following is a summary of certain provisions of the Partnership Agreement of our operating partnership. This summary is not complete and is qualified by the specific language in the partnership agreement. You should refer to the actual partnership agreement, a copy of which we have filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, for more detail.
As we accept subscriptions for shares, we will transfer substantially all of the net offering proceeds to our operating partnership in exchange for limited partnership units. However, we will be deemed to have made capital contributions in the amount of the gross offering proceeds received from investors, and our operating partnership will be deemed to have simultaneously paid the selling commissions and other costs associated with the offering.
If our operating partnership requires additional funds at any time in excess of capital contributions made by us and the Advisor, we may borrow funds from a financial institution or other lender and lend such funds to our operating partnership on the same terms and conditions as are applicable to our borrowing of such funds. In addition, we are authorized to cause our operating partnership to issue partnership interests for less than fair market value if we conclude in good faith that such issuance is in the best interest of our operating partnership and Dividend Capital Trust.
147
The partnership agreement requires that our operating partnership be operated in a manner that will enable Dividend Capital Trust to (1) satisfy the requirements for being classified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, unless we otherwise cease to qualify as a REIT, (2) avoid any federal income or excise tax liability, and (3) ensure that our operating partnership will not be classified as a "publicly traded partnership" for purposes of Section 7704 of the Code, which classification could result in our operating partnership being taxed as a corporation, rather than as a partnership. (See "Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsFederal Income Tax Aspects of Our PartnershipClassification as a Partnership").
The limited partners of our operating partnership (other than Dividend Capital Trust, the Advisor and the holder of the Special Units) generally have the right to cause our operating partnership to redeem all or a portion of their limited partnership units for, at our sole discretion, shares of our common stock or cash, or a combination of both. If we elect to redeem limited partnership units for shares of our common stock, we will generally deliver one share of our common stock for each limited partnership unit redeemed. If we elect to redeem limited partnership units for cash, we will generally deliver cash to be paid in an amount equal to the most recent selling price of our common stock per redeemed partnership unit. In connection with the exercise of these redemption rights, a limited partner must make certain representations, including that the delivery of shares of our common stock upon redemption would not result in such limited partner owning shares in excess of our ownership limits in our articles of incorporation. The Special Units will be redeemed for a specified amount of cash upon the occurrence of specified termination events under the Advisory Agreement or the listing of our common stock. See "ManagementManagement Compensation."
Subject to the foregoing, limited partners (other than the Advisor and the holders of the Special Units) may exercise their redemption rights at any time after one year following the date of issuance of their limited partnership units; provided, however, that a limited partner may not deliver more than two redemption notices each calendar year and may not exercise a redemption right for less than 1,000 limited partnership units, unless the limited partner holds less than 1,000 units, in which case, it must exercise its redemption right for all of its units.
Dividend Capital Trust may not (1) voluntarily withdraw as the general partner of our operating partnership, (2) engage in any merger, consolidation or other business combination, or (3) transfer its general partnership interest in our operating partnership (except to a wholly-owned subsidiary), unless the transaction in which such withdrawal, business combination or transfer occurs results in the limited partners receiving or having the right to receive an amount of cash, securities or other property equal in value to the amount they would have received if they had exercised their redemption rights immediately prior to such transaction (or in the case of the holder of the Special Units, the amount of cash, securities or other property equal to the fair market value of the Special Units) or unless, in the case of a merger or other business combination, the successor entity contributes substantially all of its assets to our operating partnership in return for an interest in our operating partnership and agrees to assume all obligations of the general partner of our operating partnership. Dividend Capital Trust may also enter into a business combination or we may transfer our general partnership interest upon the receipt of the consent of a majority-in-interest of the limited partners of our operating partnership, other than the Advisor and its affiliates. With certain exceptions, the limited partners may not transfer their interests in our operating partnership, in whole or in part, without the written consent of Dividend Capital Trust as general partner. In addition, the Advisor may not transfer its interest in our operating partnership as long as it is acting as the Advisor.
148
The partnership agreement generally provides that, except as provided below with respect to the Special Units, our operating partnership will distribute cash flow from operations and, except as provided below, net sales proceeds from disposition of assets, to the partners of our operating partnership in accordance with their relative percentage interests, on at least a quarterly basis, in amounts determined by Dividend Capital Trust as general partner such that a holder of one unit of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership (other than the holder of the Special Units) will receive the same amount of annual cash flow distributions from our operating partnership as the amount of annual distributions paid to the holder of one share of our common stock.
Similarly, the partnership agreement of our operating partnership provides that income of our operating partnership from operations and, except as provided below, income of our operating partnership from disposition of assets, normally will be allocated to the partners of our operating partnership (other than the holder of the Special Units) in accordance with their relative percentage interests such that a holder of one unit of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership will be allocated income for each taxable year in an amount equal to the amount of taxable income allocated to us in respect of a holder of one share of our common stock, subject to compliance with the provisions of Sections 704(b) and 704(c) of the Code and corresponding Treasury Regulations. Losses, if any, will generally be allocated among the partners (other than the holder of the Special Units) in accordance with their respective percentage interests in our operating partnership. Upon the liquidation of our operating partnership, after payment of debts and obligations, any remaining assets of our operating partnership will be distributed in accordance with the distribution provisions of the partnership agreement to the extent of each partner's positive capital account balance.
The holders of the Special Units will be entitled to distributions from our operating partnership in an amount equal to 15% of net sales proceeds received by our operating partnership on dispositions of its assets and dispositions of real properties by joint ventures or partnerships in which our operating partnership owns an interest, after the holders of regular partnership interests, including Dividend Capital Trust, have received, in the aggregate, cumulative distributions from operating income, sales proceeds or other sources, equal to their capital contributions plus a 7% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return thereon. There will be a corresponding allocation of realized (or, in the case of redemption, unrealized) profits of our operating partnership made to the holder of the Special Units in connection with the amounts payable with respect to the Special Units, including amounts payable upon redemption of the Special Units, and those amounts will be payable only out of realized (or, in the case of redemption, unrealized) profits of our operating partnership. Depending on various factors, including the date on which shares are purchased and the price paid for such shares, a shareholder may receive more or less than the 7% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return on their net contributions described above prior to the commencement of distributions to the Special Units holders.
In addition to the administrative and operating costs and expenses incurred by our operating partnership in acquiring and operating real properties, our operating partnership will pay all administrative costs and expenses of Dividend Capital Trust and such expenses will be treated as expenses of our operating partnership. Such expenses will include:
149
We are offering up to $1,000,000,000 in shares of our common stock. We are offering up to 72,770,273 shares to the public through the Dealer Manager, Dividend Capital Securities LLC, a registered broker-dealer affiliated with Advisor. (See "Conflicts of Interest"). The shares are being offered at a price of $10.50 per share and are being underwritten by the Dealer Manager on a "best efforts" basis, which means generally that the Dealer Manager and the participating broker-dealers will be required to use only their best efforts to sell the shares and have no firm commitment or obligation to purchase any of the shares. We are also offering up to 23,650,339 shares pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan through which participants will be able to acquire shares at a discounted price equal to 95% of the current offering price of our common stock, or $9.975 per share. We reserve the right to reallocate the shares of common stock we are offering between our primary offering and our distribution reinvestment plan.
In addition, after the commencement of this offering, our board of directors may from time to time change the offering price of our common stock, and therefore the amount of shares being offered in this offering, through one or more supplements or amendments to this prospectus or post-effective amendments to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Except for shares issued pursuant to our Distribution Reinvestment Plan, the Dealer Manager will receive sales commissions of up to 6.0% of the gross offering proceeds. The Dealer Manager will receive additional compensation in the form of a dealer manager fee as compensation for acting as the Dealer Manager and for expenses incurred in connection with coordinating sales efforts, training of personnel and generally managing the offering of our common stock. The Dealer Manager will receive a dealer manager fee of up to 2.0% of the gross offering proceeds. We will not pay referral or similar fees to any accountants, attorneys or other persons in connection with the distribution of the shares. Shareholders who elect to participate in our Distribution Reinvestment Plan will be charged a one-time 1% servicing fee payable to the Dealer Manager (all or a portion of which may be re-allowed to participating brokers-dealers) on shares purchased pursuant to our Distribution Reinvestment Plan.
The Dealer Manager will authorize certain other broker-dealers who are members of the NASD to sell shares. In connection with the sale of shares by such participating broker-dealers, the Dealer Manager may re-allow its commissions to such participating broker-dealers. In addition, the Dealer Manager, in its sole discretion, may re-allow to broker-dealers participating in the offering a portion of its dealer manager fee in the aggregate amount of up to 1.0% of gross offering proceeds to be paid to such participating broker-dealers for reimbursement of marketing expenses. Reimbursement will be contingent upon the receipt of an invoice or a similar such statement from the participating broker-dealers that demonstrates the actual expenses incurred by that broker-dealer. The maximum amount of reimbursements will be based on such factors as the number of shares sold by participating broker-dealers, the assistance of such participating broker-dealers in marketing the offering and bona fide expenses incurred. Out of organization and offering expenses, we may also reimburse actual due diligence expenses incurred by the Dealer Manager or non-affiliated broker-dealers in an amount of up to 0.5% of gross offering proceeds.
Assuming we sell 72,770,273 shares to the public, we anticipate that the total underwriting compensation and offering expense reimbursement, including sales commissions, the dealer manager fee and organizational and offering expense reimbursements (which includes costs of investor and broker-dealer sales meetings, marketing support fees, salaries of employees while engaged in registering, marketing and wholesaling and other costs associated with the issuance and distribution of shares), will not exceed 7.6% of the gross offering proceeds (assuming we issue 23,650,339 shares pursuant to our Distribution Reinvestment Plan) or 9.7% of gross offering proceeds (assuming we issue no shares pursuant to our Distribution Reinvestment Plan), except for the due diligence expenses described above. Of the approximately $15.3 million maximum organizational and offering expense
150
reimbursement, approximately $12.7 million of the expenses (or 1.7% of gross offering proceeds assuming we issue no shares pursuant to our Distribution Reinvestment Plan) are anticipated to be used for wholesaling activities and are therefore deemed to be additional underwriting compensation pursuant to NASD Rule 2710. To the extent that the remaining approximately $2.6 million of organizational and offering expenses are insufficient to cover our cost of administering this offering, such shortfall would serve to reduce the organizational and offering expenses available to provide underwriting compensation. Under applicable NASD rules, the maximum compensation that may be paid in this offering to NASD members is underwriting compensation equal to 10% of gross offering proceeds and bona fide due diligence expense reimbursement equal to 0.5% of gross offering proceeds.
We have agreed to indemnify the participating broker-dealers, including the Dealer Manager, against certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The broker-dealers participating in the offering of our common stock are not obligated to obtain any subscriptions on our behalf, and we cannot assure you that any shares will be sold.
Our executive officers and directors and their immediate family members, as well as officers and employees of the Advisor or other affiliates and their immediate family members and, if approved by our board, joint venture partners, consultants and other service providers, may purchase shares offered in this offering and may be charged a reduced rate for certain fees and expenses in respect of such purchases. We expect that a limited number of shares will be sold to such persons. However, except for certain share ownership and transfer restrictions contained in our Articles of Incorporation, there is no limit on the number of shares that may be sold to such persons.
Based on a public offering price of $10.50 per share, the purchase price for such shares shall be $9.66 per share reflecting sales commissions in the amount of $0.63 per share and dealer manager fees in the amount of $0.21 per share that will not be paid in connection with such sales. The net offering proceeds we receive will not be affected by the reduced sales price of such shares. The Advisor and its affiliates shall be expected to hold their shares purchased as shareholders for investment and not with a view towards distribution, and the shares purchased by the Advisor or its affiliates shall not be entitled to vote on any matter presented to the shareholders for a vote.
In January 2005, in connection with our third public offering, members of our board of directors, managers of our advisor, our advisor's senior management team and/or each of their respective affiliates collectively purchased in excess of $1.0 million of our common stock.
You should pay for your shares by check payable to "Dividend Capital Trust Inc." Subscriptions will be effective only upon our acceptance, and we reserve the right to reject any subscription in whole or in part. We may not accept a subscription for shares until at least five business days after the date you receive this prospectus and until you have received a confirmation of your purchase.
The proceeds of the offering for shares sold to New York residents will be delivered to us and held in trust for the benefit of investors and will be used only for the purposes set forth in this prospectus. Before they are applied, funds may be placed in short-term, low-risk interest bearing investments including obligations of, or obligations guaranteed by, the United States government or bank money-market accounts or certificates of deposits of national or state banks that have deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation which can be readily sold or otherwise disposed of for cash without any disposition of the offering proceeds.
In certain states, the offering may continue for just one year unless we renew the offering period for up to one additional year. In the event that other states impose different requirements than those set forth herein, such additional requirements will be set forth in a supplement to this prospectus.
151
Subscriptions will be accepted or rejected within 30 days of receipt by us, and if rejected, all funds shall be returned to subscribers within 10 business days. Investors whose subscriptions are accepted will be deemed admitted as shareholders of Dividend Capital Trust on the day on which their subscriptions are accepted. Our offering will terminate upon the earlier of June 9, 2007, or the date on which all shares being offered have been sold.
In connection with sales of $500,000 or more to a Qualifying Purchaser (as defined below), a participating broker-dealer will offer such Qualifying Purchaser a volume discount by reducing the amount of its sales commissions. Such reduction will be credited to the Qualifying Purchaser by reducing the total purchase price of the shares payable by the Qualifying Purchaser.
Based on a public offering price of $10.50 per share, the following table illustrates the various discount levels that may be offered to Qualifying Purchasers by participating broker-dealers for shares sold:
|
Sales Commission |
|
|
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dollar Volume Shares Purchased |
Purchase Price Per Share |
Dealer Manager Fee Per Share |
Net Proceeds Per Share |
|||||||||||
Percent |
Per Share |
|||||||||||||
Under $499,999 | 6.0 | % | $ | 0.6300 | $ | 10.5000 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 9.66 | ||||
$500,000 - $999,999 | 5.0 | % | $ | 0.5195 | $ | 10.3895 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 9.66 | ||||
$1,000,000 - $1,499,999 | 4.0 | % | $ | 0.4113 | $ | 10.2813 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 9.66 | ||||
$1,500,000 - $1,999,999 | 3.0 | % | $ | 0.3053 | $ | 10.1753 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 9.66 | ||||
$2,000,000 - $2,999,999 | 2.0 | % | $ | 0.2014 | $ | 10.0714 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 9.66 | ||||
$3,000,000 and Over | 1.0 | % | $ | 0.0997 | $ | 9.9697 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 9.66 |
For example, a Qualifying Purchaser may purchase 100,000 shares for $1,028,130 instead of $1,050,000, the sales commission would be $41,130 ($0.4113 per share), and, after payment of the dealer manager fee, we would receive net proceeds of $966,000 ($9.66 per share). The net proceeds to Dividend Capital Trust will not be affected by volume discounts. Because all shareholders will be deemed to have contributed the same amount per share to Dividend Capital Trust for purposes of declaring and paying distributions, a Qualifying Purchaser will receive a better return on his investment than investors who do not qualify for such discount.
Subscriptions may be combined for the purpose of determining volume discount levels in the case of subscriptions made by any Qualifying Purchaser, provided all such shares are purchased through the same broker-dealer. Any such reduction in sales commissions shall be prorated among the separate investors. Requests to combine subscriptions as a Qualifying Purchaser must be made in writing to the Dealer Manager and any such request will be subject to verification by the Dealer Manager.
The term Qualifying Purchaser includes:
Notwithstanding the above, the Dealer Manager may, at its sole discretion, enter into an agreement with a participating broker-dealer, whereby such broker-dealer may aggregate subscriptions as part of a combined order for the purposes of offering investors reduced sales commissions to as low as 1%, provided that any such aggregate group of subscriptions must be received from such
152
broker-dealer. Additionally, the Dealer Manager may, at its sole discretion, aggregate subscriptions as part of a combined order for the purposes of offering investors reduced sales commissions to as low as 1%, provided that any such aggregate group of subscriptions must be received from the Dealer Manager. Any reduction in sales commissions will be prorated among the separate subscribers.
Investors should ask their broker-dealer about the opportunity to receive volume discounts by either qualifying as a Qualifying Purchaser or by having their subscription(s) aggregated with the subscriptions of other investors, as described above.
In order to encourage purchases in amounts of 300,000 or more shares, the Dealer Manager may, in its sole discretion, agree with a Qualifying Purchaser to reduce the dealer manager fee with respect to the sale of such shares to as low as 0.5% and the sales commission with respect to the sale of such shares to as low as 0.5%. Additionally, the Advisor may, in its sole discretion, agree with a Qualifying Purchaser to reduce the organizational and offering expense reimbursements with respect to the sale of such shares to as low as 0.5%. Based on a public offering price of $10.50 per share, if a Qualifying Purchaser acquired 300,000 or more shares, the Qualifying Purchaser could pay as little as $9.5939 per share purchased. The net proceeds to Dividend Capital Trust would not be affected by such fee reductions.
Investors may also agree with the participating broker-dealer selling them shares (or with the Dealer Manager if no participating broker-dealer is involved in the transaction) to reduce the amount of sales commission to zero (i) in the event the investor has engaged the services of a registered investment advisor with whom the investor has agreed to pay a fee for investment advisory services, or (ii) in the event the investor is investing in a bank trust account with respect to which the investor has delegated the decision-making authority for investments made in the account to a bank trust department. The amount of proceeds to Dividend Capital Trust will not be affected by eliminating commissions payable in connection with sales to investors purchasing through such registered investment advisors or bank trust department. All such sales must be made through registered broker-dealers. Neither the Dealer Manager nor its affiliates will directly or indirectly compensate any person engaged as an investment advisor or a bank trust department by a potential investor as an inducement for such investment advisor or bank trust department to advise favorably for an investment in Dividend Capital Trust.
In addition to this prospectus, we may utilize certain sales material in connection with the offering of the shares, although only when accompanied by or preceded by the delivery of this prospectus. In certain jurisdictions, some or all of such sales material may not be available. This material may include information relating to this offering, the past performance of the Advisor and its affiliates, property brochures and articles and publications concerning real estate. In addition, the sales material may contain certain quotes from various publications without obtaining the consent of the author or the publication for use of the quoted material in the sales material.
The offering of shares is made only by means of this prospectus. Although the information contained in such sales material will not conflict with any of the information contained in this prospectus, such material does not purport to be complete, and should not be considered a part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, or as incorporated by reference in this prospectus or said registration statement or as forming the basis of the offering of the shares.
153
The legality of the shares being offered hereby has been passed upon for Dividend Capital Trust by Clifford Chance US LLP. Such firm has represented the Advisor and certain of its affiliates in other matters and may continue to do so in the future. (See "Conflicts of Interest"). The statements relating to certain federal income tax matters under the caption "Federal Income Tax Considerations" have been reviewed by and the qualification of Dividend Capital Trust as a REIT for federal income tax purposes has been passed upon by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP.
The consolidated financial statements of Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for the period from inception (April 12, 2002) to December 31, 2002, and related financial statement schedule, and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 have been included herein and in the registration statement in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The statements of revenue and certain expenses of the Bondesen Business Park, Beltway 8 Business Park and Rittiman Business Park located in Houston and San Antonio, Texas; the Parkwest and Mid-South Logistics distribution facilities located in Hebron, Kentucky and Lavergne, Tennessee; the Eagles Landing and South Creek I & II facilities located in Fairburn and Stockbridge, Georgia; the RN Portfolio of 53 bulk distribution, light industrial and service center facilities located in Atlanta, Georgia, Boston, Massachusetts, Dallas, Texas, Houston, Texas, Phoenix, Arizona and San Francisco, California; and the Foothill Business Center located in Los Angeles, California for the year ended December 31, 2003, included in this prospectus have been audited by Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, an independent registered public accounting firm, as indicated in their reports with respect thereto, and are included in this prospectus in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The statements of revenue and certain expenses for Memphis I located in Memphis, Tennessee; and the Baltimore-Washington Portfolio located in Baltimore, Maryland for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this prospectus have also been audited by Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, an independent registered public accounting firm, as indicated in their reports with respect thereto, and are included in this prospectus in reliance upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Commission. You may read and copy any document that we file at the public reference facilities of the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 25049. Please call the Commission at (800) SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference facilities. These documents also may be accessed through the Commission's electronic data gathering, analysis and retrieval system ("EDGAR") via electronic means, including the Commission's home page on the Internet (http://www.sec.gov).
You may request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by writing or telephoning us at the following address:
Dividend
Capital Trust Inc.
Investor Relations
518 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1700
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone (303) 228-2200
154
Within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year we will provide to our shareholders of record an annual report. The annual report will contain audited financial statements and certain other financial and narrative information that we are required to provide to shareholders. During the years 2002, 2003 and 2004, we provided an annual report to our shareholders of record.
We also maintain an internet site at http://www.dividendcapital.com where there is additional information about our business, but the contents of that site are not incorporated by reference in or otherwise a part of this prospectus.
155
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-1
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the period from inception (April 12, 2002) to December 31, 2002. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited financial statement schedule III. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the period from inception (April 12, 2002) to December 31, 2002, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Dividend Capital Trust Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 16, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG LLP |
Denver,
Colorado
March 16, 2005
F-3
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004.
We acquired seventy-two real estate properties during 2004 that management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of Dividend Capital Trust Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting. As a result, management excluded the operations related to these properties, that had revenues totaling $15,965,524 and non-real estate assets totaling $8,656,457, included in the consolidated financial statements of Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and subsidiaries, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. The excluded property operations were acquired in the following individual acquisitions:
Eastgate
Newpoint I
MassPrim
Bondesen, Beltway, Rittiman Business Parks
Eagles Landing and SouthCreek I, II and III
AREP
Memphis Trade Center
Trade Pointe III
Interpark 70
RN Portfolio
Cypress Park East
Bayside Distribution
Norcross Facilities
Sky Harbor Transit Center
C & L Facilities
Foothill Business Center
Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has audited the financial statements included in this annual report and has issued an attestation report on management's assessment of our internal control over financial reporting included herein.
F-4
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.:
We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Dividend Capital Trust Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management's assessment that Dividend Capital Trust Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, Dividend Capital Trust Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. acquired seventy-two real estate properties during 2004 that management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of Dividend Capital Trust Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting. As a result, management excluded the operations related to these properties, that had revenues totaling $15,965,524 and non-real estate assets totaling $8,656,475,
F-5
included in the consolidated financial statements of Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and subsidiaries, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Dividend Capital Trust Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of these seventy-two real estate properties. The excluded property operations were acquired in the following individual acquisitions:
Eastgate
Newpoint I
MassPrim
Bondesen, Beltway, Rittiman Business Parks
Eagles Landing and SouthCreek I, II, and III
AREP
Memphis Trade Center
Trade Pointe III
Interpark 70
RN Portfolio
Cypress Park East
Bayside Distribution
Norcross Facilities
Sky Harbor Transit Center
C & L Facilities
Foothill Business Center
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the period from inception (April 12, 2002) to December 31, 2002, and our report dated March 16, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
KPMG LLP |
Denver,
Colorado
March 16, 2005
F-6
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
As of December 31, |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||
Land | $ | 120,054,674 | $ | 17,380,389 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements | 572,284,194 | 120,062,846 | ||||||||
Intangible lease asset | 61,724,701 | 14,402,878 | ||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (21,862,036 | ) | (1,212,762 | ) | ||||||
Net Investment in Real Estate | 732,201,533 | 150,633,351 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
23,520,267 |
4,076,642 |
||||||||
Restricted cash | 5,414,224 | 525,383 | ||||||||
Notes receivable | 4,238,700 | | ||||||||
Deferred loan costs, net | 5,406,882 | 222,344 | ||||||||
Deferred acquisition costs and deposits | 7,156,477 | 485,237 | ||||||||
Straight-line rent and other receivables | 5,704,063 | 140,297 | ||||||||
Other assets | 1,166,124 | 524,282 | ||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 784,808,270 | $ | 156,607,536 | ||||||
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 6,302,922 | $ | 1,179,871 | ||||||
Dividends payable | 9,737,171 | 1,473,944 | ||||||||
Tenant prepaids and security deposits | 4,038,534 | 515,139 | ||||||||
Other liabilities | 2,842,538 | 982,993 | ||||||||
Intangible lease liability, net | 5,518,657 | 1,434,548 | ||||||||
Line of credit | 4,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||
Mortgage notes | 142,754,768 | 40,500,000 | ||||||||
Financing obligations | 32,394,877 | 2,695,696 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities | 203,593,467 | 49,782,191 | ||||||||
Minority interest | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||||
Shareholders' Equity: | ||||||||||
Preferred shares, 50,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | | | ||||||||
Shares-in-trust, 100,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | | | ||||||||
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 350,000,000 shares authorized, 67,719,883 and 12,470,400 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively | 677,199 | 124,704 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 611,440,163 | 108,816,615 | ||||||||
Distributions in excess of earnings | (26,635,877 | ) | (2,116,974 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (4,267,682 | ) | | |||||||
Total Shareholders' Equity | 581,213,803 | 106,824,345 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | $ | 784,808,270 | $ | 156,607,536 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
For the Period From Inception (April 12, 2002) to December 31, 2002 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
|
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
REVENUE: | ||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 28,625,448 | $ | 2,289,074 | $ | | ||||||
Other real estate income | 6,052,863 | 356,019 | | |||||||||
Interest income | 874,871 | 61,364 | 155 | |||||||||
Total Revenue | 35,553,182 | 2,706,457 | 155 | |||||||||
EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||
Real estate taxes | 3,829,904 | 231,158 | | |||||||||
Other operating expenses | 3,374,821 | 135,492 | | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 19,273,357 | 1,195,330 | | |||||||||
Interest expense | 5,977,888 | 385,424 | | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 2,371,591 | 411,948 | 212,867 | |||||||||
Asset management fees, related party | 1,525,194 | | | |||||||||
Total Expenses | 36,352,755 | 2,359,352 | 212,867 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) before minority interest | (799,573 | ) | 347,105 | (212,712 | ) | |||||||
Minority Interest |
|
|
200,000 |
|||||||||
Other Income: | ||||||||||||
Gain on hedging activities | 544,561 | | | |||||||||
Total Other Income | 544,561 | | | |||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | (255,012 | ) | $ | 347,105 | $ | (12,712 | ) | ||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING | ||||||||||||
Basic | 37,907,838 | 3,987,429 | 200 | |||||||||
Diluted | 37,927,838 | 4,007,429 | 200 | |||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE | ||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.09 | $ | (63.56 | ) | ||||
Diluted | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.09 | $ | (63.56 | ) | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-8
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)
and Other Comprehensive Loss
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for the Period
From Inception (April 12, 2002) to December 31, 2002
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Distributions in Excess of Earnings |
Total Shareholders' Equity (Deficit) |
||||||||||||||||
|
Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at period of Inception (April 12, 2002) | | | | | | | |||||||||||||
Net loss | | | | (12,712 | ) | | (12,712 | ) | |||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs | 200 | 2 | 1,998 | | | 2,000 | |||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2002 | 200 | 2 | 1,998 | (12,712 | ) | | (10,712 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income | | | | 347,105 | | 347,105 | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs | 12,470,200 | 124,702 | 108,811,836 | | | 108,936,538 | |||||||||||||
Amortization of stock options | | | 2,781 | | | 2,781 | |||||||||||||
Dividends on common shares | | | | (2,451,367 | ) | | (2,451,367 | ) | |||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2003 | 12,470,400 | $ | 124,704 | $ | 108,816,615 | $ | (2,116,974 | ) | $ | | $ | 106,824,345 | |||||||
Comprehensive loss: | |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | | | | (255,012 | ) | | (255,012 | ) | |||||||||||
Net unrealized change in cash flow hedging derivative | | | | | (4,267,682 | ) | (4,267,682 | ) | |||||||||||
Comprehensive loss | | | | (255,012 | ) | (4,267,682 | ) | (4,522,694 | ) | ||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs | 55,463,771 | 554,638 | 504,698,665 | | | 505,253,303 | |||||||||||||
Redemption of common stock | (214,288 | ) | (2,143 | ) | (2,081,009 | ) | | | (2,083,152 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of stock options | | | 5,892 | | | 5,892 | |||||||||||||
Dividends on common shares | | | | (24,263,891 | ) | | (24,263,891 | ) | |||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2004 | 67,719,883 | $ | 677,199 | $ | 611,440,163 | $ | (26,635,877 | ) | $ | (4,267,682 | ) | $ | 581,213,803 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-9
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
For the Period From Inception (April 12, 2002) to December 31, 2002 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (255,012 | ) | $ | 347,105 | $ | (12,712 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | |||||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization | 19,273,357 | 1,220,929 | |||||||||||
Other depreciation and amortization | 1,364,932 | | |||||||||||
Increase in other assets | (2,925,197 | ) | (222,099 | ) | (5,810 | ) | |||||||
Gain on hedging activities | (544,561 | ) | | | |||||||||
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and other liabilities | 4,538,570 | 353,853 | 79,500 | ||||||||||
Minority interest | | | (200,000 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 21,452,089 | 1,699,788 | (139,022 | ) | |||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
Real estate investments | (548,478,158 | ) | (149,601,934 | ) | | ||||||||
Increase in restricted cash | (4,854,224 | ) | | | |||||||||
Increase in deferred acquisition costs | (4,921,644 | ) | (485,237 | ) | | ||||||||
Increase in notes receivable and equity investments | (4,314,000 | ) | | ||||||||||
Master lease payments | 2,531,910 | 138,943 | | ||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (560,036,116 | ) | (149,948,228 | ) | | ||||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||||||||
Proceeds on line of credit | 104,404,000 | 9,000,000 | | ||||||||||
Payments on line of credit | (105,400,000 | ) | (8,000,000 | ) | | ||||||||
Proceeds from mortgage notes | 55,000,000 | 51,850,000 | | ||||||||||
Principal payments on mortgage notes | (882,514 | ) | (11,350,000 | ) | | ||||||||
Proceeds from financing obligations | 29,940,479 | 2,695,696 | | ||||||||||
Principal payments on financing obligations | (139,025 | ) | | | |||||||||
Increase in deferred loan costs | (7,710,555 | ) | (250,412 | ) | | ||||||||
Proceeds from subscription of common shares | | | (681,890 | ) | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of common shares | 547,751,582 | 124,139,265 | 2,000 | ||||||||||
Offering costs for issuance of common shares, related party | (52,601,211 | ) | (14,846,022 | ) | | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in advance for offering costs, related party | | 52,923 | (52,923 | ) | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Partnership Units to related party | | | 200,000 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Special Units to related party | | | 1,000 | ||||||||||
Redemption of common stock | (2,083,152 | ) | | | |||||||||
Increase in restricted cash | (560,000 | ) | | 681,890 | |||||||||
Settlement of hedges | (2,182,243 | ) | | | |||||||||
Distributions to common shareholders | (7,509,709 | ) | (977,423 | ) | | ||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 558,027,652 | 152,314,027 | 150,077 | ||||||||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | $ | 19,443,625 | $ | 4,065,587 | $ | 11,055 | |||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period | $ | 4,076,642 | $ | 11,055 | $ | | |||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period | $ | 23,520,267 | $ | 4,076,642 | $ | 11,055 | |||||||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information | |||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest expense | $ | 4,740,214 | $ | 344,268 | $ | | |||||||
Assumption of secured debt in connection with real estate acquired | $ | 45,618,952 | $ | | $ | | |||||||
Amount issued pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan | $ | 8,490,955 | $ | | $ | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-10
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1Organization
Dividend Capital Trust Inc., was formed as a Maryland corporation in April 2002 in order to invest in commercial real estate properties, consisting primarily of high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties net leased to creditworthy corporate customers. We have qualified as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for federal tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2003. We are structured as an umbrella partnership REIT ("UPREIT") under which substantially all of our current and future business is and will be conducted through a majority owned subsidiary, Dividend Capital Operating Partnership LP (our partnership), a Delaware limited partnership and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of our partnership. As used herein, "Dividend Capital", "we" and "us" refer to Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries except where the context otherwise requires.
Our day to day activities are managed by Dividend Capital Advisors LLC (our advisor), an affiliate, under the terms and conditions of an advisory agreement. Our advisor is currently majority owned and/or controlled by three of our directors and certain officers and/or their affiliates and other third parties. In addition, under the terms of a dealer manager agreement, Dividend Capital Securities LLC (the "Dealer Manager") serves as the dealer manager of our public offerings. The Dealer Manager is currently majority owned and/or controlled by three of our directors and certain officers and/or their affiliates and other third parties. Our advisor and the Dealer Manager receive compensation and fees for services relating to our offering and for the investment and management of our assets (see "Note 13Related Party Transactions").
Note 2Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
Our financial statements and the financial statements of our subsidiaries are consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Certain items in the consolidated financial statements for 2003 and 2002 have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revision are reflected in the period they are determined to be necessary.
Investment in Real Estate
We capitalize direct costs associated with the acquisition, development or improvement of real estate, including acquisition fees paid to our advisor. Costs associated with acquisition or development
F-11
pursuits are capitalized as incurred and if the pursuit is abandoned, these costs are expensed in the period in which the pursuit is abandoned.
Upon acquisition, the total cost of a property is allocated to land, building, land improvements, tenant improvements and intangible lease assets and liabilities pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141,"Business Combinations" ("SFAS No. 141"). The allocation of the total cost to land, building, land improvements and tenant improvements is based on our estimate of their fair value based on all available information such as appraisals, property condition reports and other related information. Pursuant to SFAS No. 141, the difference between the fair value and the face value of debt assumed in an acquisition should be recorded as a premium or discount and amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt assumed. The valuation of assumed liabilities is based on the current market rate for similar liabilities. The allocation of the total cost of a property to an intangible lease asset includes the value associated with the in-place leases which may include leasing commissions, legal and other costs. In addition, the allocation of the total cost of a property requires allocating costs to an intangible asset or liability resulting from in-place leases being above or below the market rental rates on the date of the acquisition. This asset or liability will be amortized over the life of the remaining in-place leases as an adjustment to revenue. Aggregate amortization expense for amortizing intangible assets was approximately $6,448,000 and $430,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Estimated net amortization for the next five years is: $15,607,981 in 2005, $11,536,375 in 2006, $8,008,679 in 2007, $6,299,622 in 2008, and $3,174,437 in 2009.
Real estate, including land, building, land improvements, tenant improvements and intangible lease assets and liabilities are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives as follows:
Description |
Depreciable Life |
|
---|---|---|
Land | Not depreciated | |
Buildings | 40 years | |
Building and land improvements | 20 years | |
Tenant improvements and lease commissions | Term of lease | |
Intangible lease assets and liabilities | Average term of leases for property | |
Above/below market rent assets/liabilities | Tenant lease |
Maintenance and repairs expenditures are expensed as incurred and improvements are capitalized. The cost of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation and/or amortization will be removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss will be reflected in operations in the period in which such sale or retirement occurs.
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in financial institutions and other highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less.
F-12
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes cash held in escrow in connection with property acquisitions, utility deposits, real estate tax payments, issuance of mortgage debt and collateral for hedging instruments.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets to be held and used will be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We periodically evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated liquidation value of such long-lived assets, and provide for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. If impaired, the long-lived asset will be written down to its estimated fair value.
Notes Receivable
Notes receivable consists of amounts contributed as part of a strategic relationship entered into by us to acquire properties from a third-party national real estate developer (see Note 8Notes Receivable).
Debt
Debt consists of fixed rate secured mortgage debt and a secured revolving credit facility. The fixed rate secured mortgage debt includes a premium, net of accumulated amortization, of $2.5 million as of December 31, 2004.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and net unrealized change in cash flow hedging derivatives, which were approximately $(255,000) and $(4.3) million, respectively, as of December 31, 2004. We report comprehensive income (loss) in our condensed consolidated statement of shareholders' equity. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to settled and assigned hedging transactions will be amortized to interest expense over the life of our hedged debt issuance(s). Changes in the fair value of unsettled hedging transactions are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. Any ineffectiveness, as defined by SFAS No. 133 (defined below), related to our hedging transactions are reported on our statements of operations. During 2004, we recorded a gain of $544,561 related to ineffectiveness on our hedging activities (see Note 14Hedging Activities).
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133"), as amended and interpreted, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. As required by SFAS No. 133, we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the designation of the derivative. Derivatives used to hedge our exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitments attributable to a particular risk are considered "fair value" hedges.
F-13
Derivatives used to hedge our exposure to variability in expected future interest payments, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered "cash flow" hedges.
As of December 31, 2004, no derivatives were designated as "fair value" hedges. For derivatives designated as "cash flow" hedges, the changes in the fair value of the derivative that represent changes in expected future cash flows that are effectively hedged by the derivative are initially reported in other comprehensive income on the balance sheet (i.e., not included in earnings) until the derivative is settled. Upon settlement, the effective portion of the hedge is recognized in other comprehensive income and amortized over the term of designated cash flow or transaction the derivative was intended to hedge. Any change in value of the derivative that is deemed to be ineffective is charged directly to earnings when the determination of ineffectiveness is made. We assess the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and currently do not have any derivatives that are not designated as "cash flow" hedges.
Our objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use treasury locks as part of our cash flow hedging strategy. A treasury lock is designed to mitigate the risk of future interest rate fluctuations by providing a future fixed interest rate for a limited pre-determined period of time. During 2004, such derivatives were used to hedge the variability in future interest expense associated with forecasted issuances of debt.
Revenue Recognition
We record rental revenue for the full term of each lease on a straight-line basis. Certain properties have leases that provide for customer occupancy during periods that no rent is due or where minimum rent payments increase during the term of the lease. Accordingly, we record a receivable from customers that we expect to collect over the remaining lease term rather than currently, which will be recorded as deferred rents receivable. When we acquire a property, the term of existing leases is considered to commence as of the acquisition date for the purposes of this calculation. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the total increase to rental revenues due to straight line rent adjustments were $2.1 million and $85,000 respectively. There were no straight-line adjustments during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
In connection with property acquisitions, we may acquire leases with rental rates above and/or below the market rental rates. Such differences are recorded as an intangible asset or liability pursuant to SFAS No. 141 and amortized to rental revenues over the life of the respective leases. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the total net increase (decrease) to rental revenues due to the amortization of above and below market rents was $(840,000) and $5,000 respectively. There was no amortization of above and below market rents during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
In connection with certain property acquisitions, we have entered into master lease agreements with various sellers whereby the sellers are obligated to pay monthly rent until the earlier of the expiration of the master lease agreement or commencement of rent from a new customer. For financial reporting purposes, rental payments under master lease agreements are reflected as a reduction of the basis of the underlying property rather than rental revenue. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the total master lease payments received were approximately $2.5 million and $139,000,
F-14
respectively. There were no master lease payments received during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
Stock-Based Compensation
We have a stock-based employee compensation plan and an independent director compensation plan. We account for these plans under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and its related interpretations. On July 1, 2004, 20,000 options were issued to our independent directors. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had 60,000 and 40,000 options outstanding, respectively under the Director Stock Option Plan. As of December 31, 2004, and 2003, 107,500 and no options had been granted under the Employee Stock Option Plan, respectively. There were no options outstanding under both the Director Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Option Plan during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. Options granted under both the Director Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Option Plan are valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and are amortized to salary expense on a straight-line basis over the period during which the right to exercise such options fully vests. Such expense is included in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Interest and Other Income
Interest and other income consists primarily of interest income on cash balances and notes receivable and gains on hedging transactions.
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is determined by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share includes the effects of potentially issuable common stock, but only if dilutive, including the presumed exchange of limited partnership units for common shares.
F-15
Note 3Real Estate
The following table describes the properties that we owned as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
As of December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||
|
Number of Buildings |
Total Cost(1) |
Number of Buildings |
Total Cost(1) |
|||||||
Atlanta(2) | 18 | $ | 147,660,147 | | $ | | |||||
Boston | 5 | 27,059,198 | | | |||||||
Chicago | 1 | 11,369,570 | 1 | 11,369,570 | |||||||
Cincinnati | 7 | 78,925,147 | 3 | 26,241,585 | |||||||
Dallas | 18 | 93,033,056 | 3 | 40,788,126 | |||||||
Denver | 1 | 8,949,122 | | | |||||||
Houston | 21 | 83,956,543 | 1 | 8,596,926 | |||||||
Indianapolis(2) | 1 | 15,139,213 | 1 | 15,653,875 | |||||||
Los Angeles | 4 | 32,743,856 | 1 | 9,791,928 | |||||||
Louisville | 2 | 18,350,820 | | | |||||||
Memphis(2) | 3 | 39,558,525 | 2 | 14,920,431 | |||||||
Nashville | 3 | 59,340,369 | 1 | 24,483,671 | |||||||
Orlando | 2 | 15,687,080 | | | |||||||
Phoenix | 13 | 79,195,211 | | | |||||||
San Antonio | 2 | 7,724,491 | | | |||||||
San Francisco | 5 | 35,371,221 | | | |||||||
Total | 106 | $ | 754,063,569 | 13 | $ | 151,846,112 | |||||
F-16
The following table summarizes our acquisition activity for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Each of the transactions listed was purchased from unaffiliated third parties under terms negotiated by our advisor.
Transaction |
Date |
Number of Markets |
Number of Buildings |
Approximate Total Acquisition Cost(1) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 Acquisitions: | |||||||||||
Eastgate | 3/19 | 1 | 1 | $ | 14,796,664 | ||||||
Newpoint I | 3/31 | 1 | 1 | 15,051,295 | |||||||
MassPrim | 5/03 | 2 | 2 | 14,875,607 | |||||||
Bondesen, Beltway, Rittiman Business Parks(2) | 6/03 | 2 | 13 | 50,817,159 | |||||||
Eagles Landing & SouthCreek I, II & III(2) | 6/08 / 9/21 | 1 | 4 | 53,048,730 | |||||||
AREP(3) | 6/08 / 6/29 | 2 | 4 | 67,941,804 | |||||||
Memphis Trade Center | 6/22 | 1 | 1 | 24,859,076 | |||||||
Trade Pointe III | 9/28 | 1 | 1 | 8,259,775 | |||||||
Interpark 70 | 9/30 | 1 | 1 | 8,949,122 | |||||||
RN Portfolio(2) | 10/01 | 6 | 53 | 238,897,395 | |||||||
Cypress Park East | 10/22 | 1 | 2 | 15,681,760 | |||||||
Bayside Distribution | 11/03 | 1 | 2 | 22,128,638 | |||||||
Norcross Facilities | 11/05 | 1 | 2 | 17,708,926 | |||||||
Sky Harbor Transit Center | 11/24 | 1 | 1 | 10,131,396 | |||||||
C&L Facilities | 12/03 | 2 | 2 | 19,016,457 | |||||||
Foothill Business Center | 12/9 | 1 | 3 | 22,426,545 | |||||||
Total 2004 Acquisitions | 8 | 93 | $ | 604,590,349 | |||||||
2003 Acquisitions: | |||||||||||
Bridgestone/Firestone | 6/9 | 1 | 1 | $ | 24,483,672 | ||||||
Chickasaw | 7/22 | 1 | 2 | 14,977,799 | |||||||
Rancho | 10/16 | 1 | 1 | 9,838,394 | |||||||
Mallard Lake | 10/29 | 1 | 1 | 11,369,570 | |||||||
West by Northwest | 10/30 | 1 | 1 | 8,596,927 | |||||||
Park West | 12/15 | 1 | 3 | 26,241,585 | |||||||
Pinnacle | 12/15 | 1 | 2 | 29,441,260 | |||||||
DFW | 12/15 | 1 | 1 | 11,372,841 | |||||||
Plainfield I | 12/22 | 1 | 1 | 15,663,010 | |||||||
Total 2003 Acquisitions | 8 | 13 | $ | 151,985,058 | |||||||
Total Acquisition Activity | 16 | 106 | $ | 756,575,407 | |||||||
We account for the acquisition of properties in accordance with SFAS No. 141 which requires that the total cost of property acquisitions be allocated to identifiable tangible and intangible assets. The
F-17
following table describes the allocation of our portfolio to these assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2004.
|
As of December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2004 Acquisitions |
2003 Acquisitions |
Total |
||||||||||
|
Balance |
% of Total |
Balance |
% of Total |
Balance |
% of Total |
|||||||
Land | 102,674,285 | 17.2 | % | 17,380,389 | 11.6 | % | 120,054,674 | 16.0 | % | ||||
Land Improvements | 46,068,215 | 7.7 | % | 7,105,857 | 4.8 | % | 53,174,072 | 7.1 | % | ||||
Building | 347,084,236 | 58.0 | % | 105,119,212 | 70.5 | % | 452,203,448 | 60.5 | % | ||||
Tenant Improvements | 58,947,166 | 9.8 | % | 7,794,843 | 5.2 | % | 66,742,009 | 8.9 | % | ||||
Tenant Leasing Costs | 83,527 | 0.0 | % | 81,138 | 0.1 | % | 164,665 | 0.0 | % | ||||
Intangible Assets | 40,396,941 | 6.7 | % | 11,024,084 | 7.4 | % | 51,421,025 | 6.9 | % | ||||
Above Mkt. Rent | 8,152,369 | 1.4 | % | 2,151,307 | 1.4 | % | 10,303,676 | 1.4 | % | ||||
Below Mkt. Rent | (4,620,273 | ) | (0.8 | )% | (1,460,136 | ) | (1.0 | )% | (6,080,409 | ) | (0.8 | )% | |
Total | 598,786,466 | 100.0 | % | 149,196,694 | 100.0 | % | 747,983,160 | 100.0 | % | ||||
Notable Acquisitions
Bondesen, Beltway and Rittiman Business Parks
On June 3, 2004, we acquired 13 distribution facilities comprising 798,412 square feet. Seven of these facilities comprise 364,803 square feet and are located in the Bondesen Business Park in Houston, Texas. These facilities include three distribution centers and four service centers. An additional four facilities comprise 261,559 square feet and are located in the Beltway 8 Business Park in Houston, Texas. These facilities consist of two distribution centers and two service centers. Another two facilities comprise 172,050 square feet and are located in the Rittiman Business Park in San Antonio, Texas. These facilities consist of distribution centers. We purchased the facilities from an unaffiliated third party for a total cost, including acquisition costs, of approximately $50.8 million.
Eagles Landing & SouthCreek I, II & III
On June 8, 2004 and on September 21, 2004, we purchased four distribution facilities comprising 1,761,874 square feet. Three facilities comprise 1,256,874 square feet and are located in Fairburn, Georgia, a submarket of Atlanta. The other facility comprises 505,000 square feet and is located in Stockbridge, Georgia, also a submarket of Atlanta. Upon expiration of its lease on August 1, 2004, a customer occupying 400,704 square feet relocated from SouthCreek Distribution Center I to SouthCreek Distribution Center III. Effective August 1, 2004, the vacated facility is under a master lease agreement whereby the seller is obligated to pay monthly rent until the earlier of July 31, 2004 or the commencement of rent from a new customer. We purchased the facilities from an unaffiliated third party for a total cost, including acquisition costs, of approximately $53.0 million.
AREP
On June 8, 2004, and on June 29, 2004, we purchased four facilities comprising 1,719,912 square feet. Three distribution facilities comprising 1,199,912 square feet are located in Hebron, Kentucky, a submarket of Cincinnati. The remaining distribution facility comprising 520,000 is located in La Vergne,
F-18
Tennessee, a sub-market of Nashville. In conjunction with the purchase of these facilities, we assumed mortgage debt of approximately $41.7 million. We purchased the facilities from an unaffiliated third party for a total cost, including acquisition costs, of approximately $67.9 million.
RN Portfolio
On October 1, 2004, we acquired 53 distribution facilities comprising 4,890,753 square feet located in the following six markets: Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Houston, Phoenix and San Francisco. As of December 31, 2004, this portfolio was 85.1% leased to over 100 customers. Of the approximate 727,000 square feet of vacant space, 471,652 square feet or approximately 10% of this portfolio is under master lease agreements whereby the sellers have leased back this space for a period of 9 to 12 months or until the space is leased to a customer, whichever is sooner. We purchased these facilities from an unaffiliated third party for a total cost, including acquisition costs of $238.9 million.
Note 4Leasing Activity
Future minimum base rental payments due to us under non-cancelable leases in effect as of December 31, 2004, were as follows:
Year ending December 31, |
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | $ | 57,857,541 | ||
2006 | 48,056,009 | |||
2007 | 42,264,031 | |||
2008 | 32,708,706 | |||
2009 | 24,349,790 | |||
Thereafter | 52,345,733 | |||
Total | $ | 257,581,810 | ||
The schedule does not reflect future rental revenues from the renewal or replacement of existing leases and excludes property operating expense reimbursements. This schedule includes payments to be received under master lease agreements; however the receipt of these payments will be recorded as an adjustment to the basis of the property rather than rental revenue.
F-19
Note 5Debt
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance as of December 31, |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lender |
Stated Interest Rate |
Effective Interest Rate(4) |
||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
Secured mortgage debt: | ||||||||||||
New York Life | 5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | $ | 39,953,415 | $ | 40,500,000 | ||||
Principal(1) | 7.21 | % | 4.81 | % | 11,570,162 | | ||||||
Principal(1) | 7.08 | % | 4.81 | % | 17,174,107 | | ||||||
Prudential(1) | 6.40 | % | 6.09 | % | 12,700,000 | | ||||||
Principal(1) | 6.22 | % | 4.18 | % | 3,838,755 | | ||||||
ING Investment Management(2) | 5.31 | % | 5.34 | % | 55,000,000 | | ||||||
Weighted-average/totals(3) | 5.72 | % | 5.17 | % | 140,236,439 | 40,500,000 | ||||||
Fair value premium, net of amortization | 2,518,329 | | ||||||||||
Carrying value of debt | $ | 142,754,768 | $ | 40,500,000 | ||||||||
Secured revolving credit facility: | ||||||||||||
JP Morgan | 5.25 | % | 5.25 | % | $ | 4,000 | $ | 1,000,000 |
In December 2004, we issued $55 million of secured, non-recourse debt. The debt has a stated fixed interest rate of 5.31% and matures in 2015. The underlying notes require monthly payments of interest only for one year and monthly payments of principal and interest thereafter. In December 2003, we issued $40.5 million of secured, non-recourse debt with a fixed interest rate of 5.00%, maturing in September 2011 and requiring monthly payments of principal and interest. During 2004, in conjunction with the acquisitions of Parkwest A, B and G, Mid-South Logistics Center V and Sky Harbor Transit Center (See "Note 3Real Estate"), we assumed five secured, non-recourse notes totaling $45.6 million with stated interest rates ranging from 6.22% to 7.21%. All of these notes bear interest at a fixed rate and require monthly payments of principal and interest. They have maturity dates ranging from 2007 to 2012. Pursuant to SFAS No. 141, the difference between the fair value and face value of these notes at the date of acquisition resulted in a premium of approximately $2.9 million, which will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the underlying notes.
In October 2003, we entered into a $50.0 million secured revolving credit facility with JP Morgan Securities (formerly BankOne). In February 2004, the credit facility was amended and restated into a syndicated credit facility maturing in February 2007 and expanded commitments were received in July 2004 to reach its current capacity of $225.0 million. The credit facility currently bears interest at either
F-20
LIBOR plus 1.125% to 1.500%, depending upon the level of our leverage, or, at our election, the prime rate and is subject to an annual 0.250% facility fee. This credit facility contains various covenants including financial covenants regarding net worth, interest and fixed charge coverage and consolidated leverage.
As of December 31, 2004, the total historical cost of all of our properties was approximately $754.1 million and the total historical cost of all properties securing our fixed rate mortgage debt and secured credit facility was approximately $310.6 million and $237.7 million, respectively. Our debt has various covenants and management believes it was in compliance with all of these covenants at December 31, 2004.
The following table sets forth the scheduled maturities of our debt, excluding unamortized premiums as of December 31, 2004.
Year |
Fixed Rate Mortgage Debt |
Secured Credit Facility |
Total |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | $ | 1,379,088 | $ | | $ | 1,379,088 | ||||
2006 | 2,596,045 | | 2,596,045 | |||||||
2007 | 2,837,480 | 4,000 | 2,841,480 | |||||||
2008 | 28,793,359 | | 28,793,359 | |||||||
2009 | 2,306,402 | | 2,306,402 | |||||||
2010 | 2,432,415 | | 2,432,415 | |||||||
2011 | 37,407,982 | | 37,407,982 | |||||||
2012 | 16,307,309 | | 16,307,309 | |||||||
2013 | 1,563,727 | | 1,563,727 | |||||||
2014 | 1,648,811 | | 1,648,811 | |||||||
Thererafter | 42,963,821 | | 42,963,821 | |||||||
Total | $ | 140,236,439 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 140,240,439 | ||||
F-21
Note 6Public Offering
On April 15, 2002, we filed an S-11 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering our first public offering of our common stock. The registration statement was declared effective on July 17, 2002 and we received approval of our offering in all 50 states in December 2002. The common stock was being offered at a price of $10 per share on a 200,000 share minimum, 25,000,000 share maximum, best-efforts basis. The registration statement also covered up to 4,000,000 shares available pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan and up to 1,000,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants issued to the Dealer Manager for a price of $.001 per share for every 25 shares sold. Until we received subscriptions covering at least 200,000 shares from at least 100 non-affiliated investors, offering proceeds were required to be held in escrow. The escrow conditions were satisfied on February 10, 2003, at which time 226,567 shares of common stock were issued to investors. In April of 2004, we completed our first public offering and sold 24,998,691 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $249.2 million.
Our second offering began immediately following the completion of the initial offering. The second registration statement was filed on February 27, 2004, and was declared effective on April 16, 2004. The registration statement offered common stock at a price of $10 per share for a maximum of 30,000,000 shares. The registration statement also covered up to 10,000,000 shares available pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan as well as up to 1,200,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants sold to the Dealer Manager for a price of $.001 per share for every 25 shares sold. In October of 2004, we completed our second public offering and sold 29,997,723 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $299.0 million
Our third offering began immediately following the completion of the second offering. The third registration statement was filed on June 28, 2004, and was declared effective on October 18, 2004. The registration statement offers common stock at a price of $10.50 per share for a maximum of 40,000,000 shares. The third registration statement also covers up to 13,000,000 shares available pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. As of December 31, 2004, we had sold 11,990,577 shares pursuant to our third public offering for gross proceeds of $125.5 million.
As of December 31, 2004, 67,719,883 common shares were issued and outstanding. As disclosed in each prospectus, the net proceeds from the sale of these securities were transferred to our partnership on a one-for-one basis for limited partnership units. During 2005, we will continue to sell shares under the third public offering and potential follow-on offerings, providing capital primarily for acquisitions. We may also continue to obtain debt financing or may cause our partnership to issue limited partnership interests to help fund property acquisitions.
Note 7Partnership's Private Placement
Affiliates of our advisor have developed certain transaction structures that are designed to provide investors that own real property, either directly or indirectly, with the opportunity to receive limited partnership units in our partnership (the "DCX Units") in exchange for real property on a tax-deferred basis. The transaction structures generally involve an exchange of the property owned by the investors for a replacement property (or an undivided interest therein) identified by us in a like-kind exchange transaction under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. Such property identified by us is 100% leased indirectly by our partnership and that lease contains purchase options whereby our partnership has the right to acquire the property from the investors at a later point in time in exchange for DCX units under section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code. Each DCX Unit is intended to be the
F-22
substantial economic equivalent of one share of our common stock, and each investor who receives DCX Units may redeem them for shares of our common stock, or at our option, for cash.
Our partnership will pay certain up-front fees and reimburse certain related expenses to our advisor, the Dealer Manager and Dividend Capital Exchange Facilitators LLC (the "Facilitator") for raising capital through such transactions. Our advisor is obligated to pay all of the offering and marketing-related costs associated with the private placement. However, our partnership is obligated to pay our advisor a non-accountable expense allowance which equals 2% of the gross equity proceeds raised through the private placement. In addition, our partnership is obligated to pay the Dealer Manager a dealer manager fee of up to 1.5% of the gross equity proceeds raised and a commission of up to 5% of the gross equity proceeds raised through the private placement. The Dealer Manager may re-allow such commissions and a portion of such dealer manager fee to the participating broker dealers. Our partnership pays an intellectual property licensing fee to the Facilitator, an affiliate of our advisor, of up to 1.5% of the gross equity proceeds raised through the private placement.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, and 2003, we raised $29.9 million and $2.7 million from the sale of undivided interests in four buildings, which is included in financing obligations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets pursuant to SFAS No. 98 "Accounting for Leases" ("SFAS No. 98"). We have leased the undivided interests sold to unrelated third parties, and in accordance with SFAS No. 98, a portion of the rental payments made to third parties under the lease agreements are recognized as interest expense using the interest method. In addition, the lease agreements each provide for a purchase option whereby our partnership may purchase each undivided interest after a certain period of time in exchange for DCX Units.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, and 2003, we incurred approximately $750,000 and $15,000 of rental expense under various lease agreements with these third party investors. A portion of such amounts were accounted for as a reduction of the principal outstanding balance of the financing obligations and a portion was accounted for as an increase to interest expense in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The various lease agreements in place as of December 31, 2004, contain expiration dates ranging from November 2013, to July, 2019. The following table sets forth the five year, future minimum rental payments due to third parties under the various lease agreements:
Year Ended December 31, |
Future Minimum Rental Payments |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
2005 | $ | 2,243,724 | ||
2006 | 3,518,026 | |||
2007 | 3,493,168 | |||
2008 | 3,363,775 | |||
2009 | 3,232,299 | |||
Thereafter | 9,795,806 | |||
Total | $ | 25,646,798 | ||
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, and 2003, our partnership incurred upfront costs of approximately $2.6 and $0.2 million payable to our advisor and other affiliates for affecting
F-23
these transactions which are accounted for as deferred loan costs. Such deferred loan costs are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets and amortized to interest expense over the life of the financing obligation. If our partnership elects to exercise any purchase option as described above and issue DCX Units, the up-front fees and expense reimbursements paid to affiliates with respect to such transactions will be recorded against shareholders' equity as a selling cost of the DCX Units. If our partnership does not elect to exercise any such purchase option, the up-front fees and expense reimbursements paid to affiliates with respect to such transactions will be considered in the calculation of a gain or loss on the sale of real estate.
Note 8Notes Receivable
On March 26, 2004, we entered into a strategic relationship with Panattoni Investments, LLC ("Panattoni") pursuant to which we have committed to fund up to $15 million into various development projects. On March 26, 2004, in connection with properties to be developed in Plainfield, a sub-market of Indianapolis, we made our initial contribution of cash in exchange for notes receivable. We have since made subsequent contributions in connection with a property to be developed in Riverside, a sub-market of Los Angeles, and the Plainfield properties. In total, we have contributed $4,314,000 in exchange for three notes receivable referred to as the Plainfield (comprised of two notes) and Riverside notes. In addition to the 9.5% interest earned on these notes, we obtained certain acquisition rights to the underlying properties being developed. We have also obtained with respect to each development project an option that gives us the right to purchase an equity interest in the entity owning the underlying property. This equity interest may be up to 5% of the total amount of the principal note balance outstanding at the time of contribution. On December 31, 2004, we exercised this option on the Riverside note and converted $75,300 of the principal outstanding balance of the note to an equity interest in the entity owning the development project. We have recognized a total of $267,498 in interest revenue through December 31, 2004 from the aggregate notes receivable. All costs associated with executing these notes have been capitalized as deferred loan costs and are included in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Such costs are amortized as a reduction in interest income over the average term of the outstanding notes receivable. The following table further describes these notes and the respective maturity date on which the outstanding principal balances are due in full as balloon payments.
Project |
December 31, 2004 |
Maturity Date |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plainfield | $ | 2,808,000 | 07/26/07 & 01/26/08 | ||
Riverside | 1,430,700 | 09/03/07 | |||
Total | $ | 4,238,700 | |||
Note 9Shareholder's Equity
Preferred Shares
Our board of directors, through the articles of incorporation, has the authority to authorize the issuance of 50,000,000 preferred shares of any class or series. The rights and terms of such preferred shares will be determined by our board of directors. However, the voting rights of preferred
F-24
shareholders shall never exceed the voting rights of common shareholders. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had no outstanding shares of preferred stock.
Shares-in-Trust
Our board of directors, through the articles of incorporation, has the authority to authorize the issuance of shares-in-trust which are shares that are automatically exchanged for common or preferred shares as a result of an event that would cause an investor to own, beneficially or constructively, a number of shares in excess of certain limitations. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, we had no outstanding shares-in-trust.
Common Shares
The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by shareholders, including election of our directors. The articles of incorporation do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of our directors. Therefore, the holders of the majority of the outstanding common shares can elect our entire board of directors. Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding series of our preferred stock and to the distribution of specified amounts upon liquidation with respect to shares-in-trust, the holders of our common stock are entitled to such distributions as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors out of legally available funds and, upon liquidation, are entitled to receive all assets available for distribution to shareholders. All shares issued in our public offering will be fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock. Holders of shares of our common stock will not have preemptive rights. As of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we had 67,719,883, 12,470,400 and 200 shares of common stock outstanding, respectively.
Note 10Minority Interest
Minority interest consists of the following as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Limited partnership units | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||
Limited Partner special units | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||
Total | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | |||
Limited Partnership Units
At December 31, 2004, our partnership was approximately 99.9% owned by Dividend Capital and 0.1% by our advisor. Limited partnership units are redeemable at the option of the unit holder. Our partnership has the option of redeeming the limited partnership units with cash or with common shares. At inception (April 12, 2002), our partnership issued 20,000 limited partnership units to our advisor for gross proceeds of $200,000. The allocation of net loss to the limited partnership unit holders for the period ended December 31, 2002, had reduced the minority interest balance to zero. The excess loss attributable to the minority interest will be applied to future income attributable to the minority interest.
F-25
Limited Partnership Special Units
During 2002, our partnership issued 10,000 Special Units to an affiliate of our advisor for consideration of $1,000. The holders of Special Units do not participate in the profits and losses of our partnership. Amounts distributable to the holder of the Special Units will depend on operations and the amount of net sales proceeds received from property dispositions or upon other events. In general, after holders of regular partnership interests in aggregate have received cumulative distributions equal to their capital contributions plus a 7% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return on their net contributions, the holder of the Special Units and the holders of regular partnership interests will receive 15% and 85%, respectively, of the net sales proceeds received by our partnership upon the disposition of our partnership's assets.
Note 11Stock Option Plans and Warrants
Stock Option Plans
We have adopted an independent director stock option plan which we will use in an effort to attract and retain qualified independent directors (the "Independent Director Option Plan"). We granted non-qualified stock options to purchase 10,000 shares to each independent director pursuant to the Independent Director Option Plan upon the sale of 200,000 shares in our initial public offering. In addition, we intend to issue options to purchase 5,000 shares to each independent director then in office on the date of each annual shareholder's meeting. A total of 300,000 shares are authorized and reserved for issuance under the Independent Director Option Plan. Options may not be granted under the Independent Director Option Plan at any time when the grant would cause the total number of options outstanding under the Independent Director Option Plan and the Employee Option Plan (defined below) to exceed 10% of our issued and outstanding shares. The exercise price for options to be issued under the Independent Director Option Plan shall be the greater of (1) $12.00 per share or (2) the fair market value of the shares on the date they are granted. There were no options outstanding under the Independent Director Option Plan during 2002. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were 60,000 and 40,000 options outstanding, respectively, under the Independent Director Option Plan. These options were valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model ("Black Scholes") with the following assumptions: 2004expected dividend yield of 6.40%, risk-free interest rate of 2.74%, volatility factor of 21.23% and an expected life of 10 years; 2003expected dividend yield of 6.25%, risk-free interest rate of 2.740%, volatility factor of 17.93%, and an expected life of 10 years. The value of options granted under the Independent Director Option Plan on the date of grant during 2004 and 2003 was approximately $11,000 and $15,000. As of December 31, 2004, 16,000 options were exercisable and no options granted under the Independent Director Option Plan had been exercised or forfeited.
We have adopted an employee stock option plan (the "Employee Option Plan"). The Employee Option Plan is designed to enable us, our advisor and its affiliates to obtain or retain the services of employees (not to include any person who is a sponsor or affiliate of ours) considered essential to the our long-term success and the success of our advisor and its affiliates by offering such employees an opportunity to participate in our growth through ownership of the our shares. The Employee Option Plan will be administered by our compensation committee, which is authorized to grant "non-qualified" stock options (the "Employee Options") to selected employees of our advisor and its affiliates. Employee Options may not be granted under the Employee Option Plan at any time when the grant would cause the total number of options outstanding under the Employee Option Plan and the
F-26
Independent Director Option Plan to exceed 10% of the our issued and outstanding shares. The exercise price for the Employee Options shall be the greater of (1) $11.00 per share or (2) the fair market value of the shares on the date the Employee Option is granted. A total of 750,000 shares are authorized and reserved for issuance under the Employee Option Plan. The term of such employee options has been set by our compensation committee and shall not exceed the earlier of ten years from the date of grant or five years from the date of a listing of our common stock. Our compensation committee has set the period during which the right to exercise an Employee Option fully vests to three years from the date of grant. No Employee Option may be issued or exercised, however, if such issuance or exercise would jeopardize our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise violate the ownership and transfer restrictions imposed under the our articles of incorporation. In addition, no Employee Option may be sold, pledged, assigned or transferred by an employee in any manner other than by will or the laws of descent or distribution. There were no options outstanding under the Employee Option Plan during 2003 and 2002. As of December 31, 2004, there were 107,500 options outstanding under the Employee Option Plan with a weighted average exercise price of $11.00. These options were valued using Black-Scholes with the following assumptions: expected dividend yield of 6.40%, risk-free interest rate of 2.74%, volatility factor of 19.42% and an expected life of 10 years. The value of options granted under the Employee Option Plan on the date of grant during 2004 was approximately $61,000. As of December 31, 2004, none of these options were exercisable and no options granted under the Employee Option Plan had been exercised or forfeited.
Options granted under both the Director Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Option Plan are valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and are amortized to salary expense on a straight-line basis over the period during which the right to exercise such options fully vests. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we incurred $5,892 and $2,781 of such expense which is included in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. We did not incur any such expense during 2002 as there were no options outstanding under both the Independent Director Option Plan and the Employee Option Plan.
The following table describes all options issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the options granted and exercised and the options that have expired during 2004.
|
Independent Director Options |
Employee Options |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Issued and Outstanding at 12/31/03 | 40,000 | | ||
Granted | 20,000 | 107,500 | ||
Exercised | | | ||
Expired | | | ||
Issued and Outstanding at 12/31/04 | 60,000 | 107,500 | ||
Stock Warrants
We may issue to the Dealer Manager one soliciting dealer warrant for $.001 for every 25 shares sold during our initial and second follow-on public offering subject to a maximum of 2.2 million soliciting dealer warrants. These warrants, as well as the shares issuable upon their exercise, were registered in connection with our initial and second public offerings. The Dealer Manager may retain
F-27
or re-allow these warrants to broker-dealers participating in the offering, unless such issuance of soliciting dealer warrants is prohibited by either federal or state securities laws. The holder of a soliciting dealer warrant is entitled to purchase one share of common stock from us at a price of $12 per share beginning on the first anniversary of the effective date of the offering in which such warrants are issued and ending five years after the effective date of such offering. Subject to certain exceptions, a soliciting dealer warrant may not be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated for a period of one year following the effective date of the relevant public offering. Exercise of the soliciting dealer warrants is governed by the terms and conditions detailed in the warrant purchase agreement. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Dealer Manager had earned approximately 1.7 million and 499,000 soliciting dealer warrants, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, no warrants had been issued.
Note 12Dividends
Our Board of Directors declares the following quarter's annualized dividend before the first day of the quarter. We will calculate our dividends based upon daily record and dividend declaration dates so investors will be eligible to earn dividends immediately upon purchasing shares. We intend to accrue and pay dividends on a quarterly basis. The following table sets forth the dividends that have been declared and/or paid to date by our Board of Directors.
Quarter |
Amount Declared per Share(1) |
Date Paid |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2nd Quarter2003 | $ | 0.1558 | July 15, 2003 | ||
3rd Quarter2003 | $ | 0.1575 | October 15, 2003 | ||
4th Quarter2003 | $ | 0.1575 | January 15, 2004 | ||
1st Quarter2004 | $ | 0.1591 | April 15, 2004 | ||
2nd Quarter2004 | $ | 0.1591 | July 15, 2004 | ||
3rd Quarter2004 | $ | 0.1609 | October 15, 2004 | ||
4th Quarter2004 | $ | 0.1609 | January 18, 2005 | ||
1st Quarter2005 | $ | 0.1574 | April 15, 2005(2) |
Our distributions to shareholders are characterized for federal income tax purposes as ordinary income or a non-taxable return of capital. Distributions that exceed our current and accumulated earning and profits (calculated for tax purposes) constitute a return of capital for tax purposes rather than a dividend and reduce the shareholders' basis in the common shares. To the extent that a distribution exceeds both current and accumulated earnings and profits and the shareholders' basis in the common shares, it will generally be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of that shareholder's common shares. We notify shareholders of the taxability of distributions paid during the
F-28
preceding year on an annual basis. The following summarizes the taxability of distributions on common shares for the year ended December 31, 2004:
Per Common Share: |
Per Share Amount |
Percentage |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ordinary Income | $ | 0.378 | 59.1 | % | |||
Return of Capital | 0.262 | 40.9 | % | ||||
Total | $ | 0.640 | 100.0 | % | |||
Note 13Related Party Transactions
Advisory Agreement
We have entered into an Advisory Agreement with our advisor pursuant to which we will pay certain acquisition and asset management fees to our advisor. Our advisor is considered a related party as certain indirect owners and employees of our advisor serve as our executives. The amount of such acquisition fees was previously equal to 3% of the aggregate purchase price of all properties we acquired up to a cumulative purchase price of $170 million. In March 2004, we reached the cumulative threshold of $170 million in properties and all subsequent acquisitions have been and will continue to be subject to a reduced acquisition fee of 1.0%. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, our advisor earned approximately $6.4 million and $4.4 million, respectively, for acquisition fees which are accounted for as part of the basis of the acquired properties.
We pay our advisor an asset management fee equal to 0.75% per annum of the total undepreciated cost of the properties we owned in excess of $170 million. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, we incurred asset management fees of $1.5 million that are included in general and administrative expenses on our consolidated statement of operations. We did not incur asset management fees for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003.
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, our advisor is obligated to advance all of our organization and offering costs, subject to its right to be reimbursed for such costs by us in an amount up to 2% of the aggregate gross offering proceeds raised. Such organization and offering costs include but are not limited to actual legal, accounting, printing and other expenses attributable to organizing Dividend Capital Trust Inc., preparing the Securities and Exchange Commission registration statement, qualification of the shares for sale in the states and filing fees incurred by our advisor, as well as reimbursements for marketing, salaries and direct expenses of its employees while engaged in registering and marketing the shares, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee (see below). During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, our advisor incurred approximately $8.3, $7.7 and $3.4 million, of organization and offering costs, respectively. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we reimbursed our advisor approximately $10.9 and $3.3 million, respectively. There were no reimbursements made during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2004, the net un-reimbursed amount of organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor, since inception (April 12, 2002), was approximately $5.2 million. If we are not successful in raising additional amounts of equity proceeds, no additional amounts will be payable by us to our advisor for reimbursement of organization and offering costs.
Our advisor is obligated to pay all of the offering and marketing related costs associated with the private placement. However, our partnership is obligated to pay our advisor a non-accountable expense
F-29
allowance which equals 2% of the gross proceeds raised through our partnership's private placement. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, our partnership incurred approximately $521,000 and $54,000, respectively, payable to our advisor for such expense allowance. There was no such expense allowance incurred by our partnership during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
In accordance with the Advisory Agreement we are obligated, subject to certain limitations, to reimburse our advisor for certain other expenses incurred on our behalf for providing services contemplated in the Advisory Agreement, provided that our advisor does not receive a specific fee for the activities which generate the expenses to be reimbursed. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, we have reimbursed $326,659, $96,384 and $11,394 of such expenses.
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, we owed our advisor approximately $576,000 and $87,000 which is included in Other Liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Dealer Manager Agreement
We have entered into a Dealer Manager Agreement with the Dealer Manager pursuant to which we will pay a dealer manager fee of up to 2.0% of gross offering proceeds raised pursuant to our public offerings to the Dealer Manager as compensation for managing the offering. The Dealer Manager may re-allow a portion of such fees to broker-dealers who participate in the offering. We will also pay up to a 6% sales commission of gross offering proceeds raised pursuant to our public offerings. The Dealer Manager has indicated that all of the sales commissions are expected to be paid to participating broker-dealers who are responsible for affecting sales. As of December 31, 2004, all sales commissions were re-allowed to participating broker-dealers. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we incurred approximately $42.5 million and $11.2 million, respectively, payable to the Dealer Manager for dealer manager fees and sales commissions. We did not incur any such fees and commissions during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
We have also entered into a dealer manager agreement with the Dealer Manager pursuant to which we will pay a dealer manager fee of up to 1.5% of the gross proceeds raised through the Private Placement. We will also pay the Dealer Manager a sales commission up to 5.0% of the gross proceeds raised through the Private Placement. The Dealer Manager has indicated that all of the sales commissions are expected to be paid to participating broker-dealers who are responsible for affecting sales. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, we incurred up front fees of approximately $1.7 million and $175,000, respectively, payable to the Dealer Manager for dealer manager fees and sales commissions. We did not incur any such fees and commissions during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
Pursuant to our first and second public offerings, the Dealer Manager earned one soliciting dealer warrant for every 25 shares sold. The holder of a soliciting dealer warrant has the right to purchase one share of common stock for $12. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Dealer Manager had earned approximately 1,701,000 and 499,000 soliciting dealer warrants, respectively. Using the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123, the estimated fair value of the warrants earned in the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, was approximately $1,196,000 and $351,000, respectively. There were no warrants earned for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. These warrants do not have an impact on our consolidated statement of operations as the value of these
F-30
warrants is a cost of raising capital and therefore deducted from additional paid-in capital within shareholder's equity. There are no warrants being offered in connection with our third public offering (See "Note 9Shareholder's Equity").
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, we owed the Dealer Manager approximately $828,000 and $138,000 in relation to the fees described above which is included in other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Note 14Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash held in escrow, receivables and accounts payable approximated their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values of other financial instruments subject to fair value disclosures were determined based on available market information and valuation methodologies believed to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, therefore, these estimates are not necessarily indicative of the actual amounts that we could realize upon disposition. The following table summarizes these financial instruments:
|
Balances at December 31, 2004 |
Balances at December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Carrying Amounts |
Estimated Fair Value |
Carrying Amounts |
Estimated Fair Value |
|||||||||
Borrowings: | |||||||||||||
Senior, secured credit facility | $ | 4,000 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | |||||
Secured mortgage debt | 142,754,769 | 142,966,662 | 40,500,000 | 40,500,000 | |||||||||
Interest rate contracts: | |||||||||||||
Treasury locks | $ | (1,539,332 | ) | $ | (1,539,332 | ) | $ | | $ | |
Hedging Activities
As of December 31, 2004, we had entered into 3 hedging transactions. Each hedging transaction was a treasury lock as more fully described below:
Date Entered |
Settlement Date |
Rate Lock |
Mortgage Tenor |
Amount |
Unrealized Gains/(Losses) in Other Comprehensive Income |
Settlement Amount |
Realized Gain |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3/25/04 | 9/30/04 | 4.062 | % | 10 year | $ | 50,000,000 | $ | (105,909 | ) | $ | 292,432 | $ | 398,784 | ||||||
5/13/04 | 9/30/04 | 4.478 | % | 5 year | 50,000,000 | (2,621,441 | ) | (2,474,675 | ) | 145,777 | |||||||||
7/12/04 | 2/15/05 | 4.500 | % | 10 year | 50,000,000 | (1,540,332 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 150,000,000 | $ | (4,267,682 | ) | $ | (2,182,243 | ) | $ | 544,561 | |||||||||
On September 30, 2004, we settled two hedging transactions by paying $2,183,243. On September 23, 2004, we entered into an agreement that fixed the interest rate on the future issuance of debt which resulted in a realized ordinary gain of $544,561 that was included in other income in the
F-31
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations as a result of ineffectiveness. The ineffectiveness resulted because the fair values of the hedges increased between the date we locked the interest rate of our hedged debt issuance and the settlement date of the hedges. On February 15, 2005, we settled the third hedging transaction by paying $1,822,344 and re-hedged the position for an additional three months based on the forecasted issuance of debt (see "Note 17Subsequent Events).
An unrealized loss of $4,267,682 was recorded during 2004 to other comprehensive income (loss) as a result of the change in fair value of the settled and unsettled hedges. As of December 31, 2004, the remaining unsettled hedge with a fair value of $(1,540,332) was included in other liabilities.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to settled and assigned hedging transactions will be amortized to interest expense as interest payments are made on our hedged debt issuance(s). During 2004, $443 was amortized from other comprehensive income to interest expense. During the next 12 months, we estimate that $727,540 will be amortized from other comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense resulting in an increase of our interest expense. As previously discussed, we settled the third hedging transaction on February 15, 2005 and based upon the cash settlement, the estimate of 2005 amortization is not materially different from that mentioned above. We are hedging our exposure to the variability in future cash outflows for interest expense for forecasted transactions over a maximum period of nine months (excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on our existing credit facility).
Note 15Income Taxes
During 2004, we operated and expect to continue to operate in a manner to meet all the requirements to qualify for REIT status. We have made our REIT election under Internal Revenue Code Section 856 for our taxable year ended December 31, 2003. In order for a former C corporation to elect to be a REIT, it must distribute 100% of its C corporation earnings and profits and agree to be subject to federal tax at the corporate level to the extent of any subsequently recognized built-in gains within a ten year period. We did not have any built-in gains at the time of our conversion to REIT status. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income taxation at the corporate level to the extent we distribute 100% of our REIT taxable income annually, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, to our shareholders and satisfy other requirements. To continue to qualify as a REIT for federal tax purposes, we must distribution at least 90% of our REIT taxable income annually. No material provisions have been made for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Note 16Commitments and Contingencies
Forward Capital Commitment Agreement
In October 2004, we entered into a forward capital commitment with Wachovia Bank National Association ("Wachovia") in connection with our commitment to acquire two buildings located in Atlanta, Georgia, comprising 677,667 square feet from an unrelated third party developer. We have entered into this binding agreement with Wachovia, the construction lender, to purchase the two buildings at a price of up to $29.0 million. Our obligation to acquire the buildings from the third party developer upon completion can be satisfied under a variety of scenarios, mostly dependent upon leasing, with a minimum purchase price equal to actual development costs. In order to provide security to Wachovia under this forward capital commitment, we were required to place $4.9 million in escrow
F-32
in lieu of a letter of credit. This amount is reflected as restricted cash on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004.
Note 17Subsequent Events
Purchase of Wickes Distribution Center
On January 5, 2005, we acquired one distribution facility comprising 440,000 square feet that is located in Central DuPage County, a submarket of Chicago. We purchased the facility for a total cost of approximately $20.4 million, which includes an acquisition fee of $201,000 paid to our advisor.
Purchase of Technicolor II, Shelby 4 and Shelby 5 Distribution Facilities
In connection with our entry into a purchase agreement during 2004 with Panattoni Development Company LLC, an unrelated third party, we acquired the Technicolor II Distribution Facility ("Technicolor"), Shelby 4 Distribution Facility ("Shelby 4") and the Shelby 5 Distribution Facility ("Shelby 5") located in Memphis, Tennessee. Technicolor was acquired on February 2, 2005 and comprises 806,000 square feet. Shelby 4 was acquired on February 16, 2005 and comprises 60,000 square feet. Shelby 5 was acquired on March 7, 2005 and comprises 500,000 square feet. The combined purchase price of Technicolor, Shelby 4 and Shelby 5 was approximately $52.2 million. We incurred acquisition fees of $502,200 payable to our advisor as a result of these transactions.
Debt Issuance
On January 7, 2005, we issued $57 million of secured, non-recourse debt. The debt has a fixed interest rate of 4.40% and matures in 2010. The underlying notes require monthly payments of interest only for one year and monthly payments of principal and interest thereafter.
Hedging Activities
On January 20, 2005, we entered into two $50.0 million notional hedging transactions. Each was a forward treasury lock effectively locking a 5-year and 10-year treasury at 4.0425% and 4.439%, respectively. Each was designated a cash flow hedge and will expire on October 21, 2005. In addition, on February 15, 2005, a $50.0 million notional treasury lock entered into in July 2004 (See Note 14Hedging Activities) expired. This hedge was settled for a payment of approximately $1.8 million and the position was re-hedged for an addition three months based on the forecasted issuance of debt. Pursuant to SFAS No. 133, the fair value of the hedge continues to be recorded in other comprehensive income.
F-33
Note 18Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
The following table presents selected unaudited quarterly financial data for each quarter during the year ended December 31, 2004:
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||
|
March 31, 2004 |
June 30, 2004 |
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2004 |
|||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 2,981,658 | $ | 4,487,466 | $ | 7,485,886 | $ | 13,670,438 | $ | 28,625,448 | |||||||
Other income | 613,577 | 1,246,290 | 2,381,738 | 3,230,690 | 7,472,295 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue | 3,595,235 | 5,733,756 | 9,867,624 | 16,901,128 | 36,097,743 | ||||||||||||
Rental expenses | 797,850 | 1,116,004 | 1,799,910 | 3,490,961 | 7,204,725 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,646,277 | 2,764,558 | 4,887,968 | 9,974,554 | 19,273,357 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense | 650,588 | 894,016 | 1,650,149 | 2,783,135 | 5,977,888 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 328,074 | 456,326 | 1,423,941 | 1,688,444 | 3,896,785 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 172,446 | $ | 502,852 | $ | 105,656 | $ | (1,035,966 | ) | $ | (255,012 | ) | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: | |||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted | $ | 0.01 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.00 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Basic common shares outstanding | 16,579,579 | 29,536,431 | 44,669,644 | 60,517,467 | 37,907,838 | ||||||||||||
Diluted common shares outstanding | 16,599,579 | 29,556,431 | 44,689,644 | 60,537,467 | 37,927,838 |
The following table presents selected unaudited quarterly financial data for each quarter during the year ended December 31, 2003:
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||
|
March 31, 2003 |
June 30, 2003 |
September 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | | $ | 117,596 | $ | 842,519 | $ | 1,328,959 | $ | 2,289,074 | ||||||
Other income | 834 | 39,088 | 10,828 | 366,633 | 417,383 | |||||||||||
Total revenue | 834 | 156,684 | 853,347 | 1,695,592 | 2,706,457 | |||||||||||
Rental expenses | | | 88,978 | 277,672 | 366,650 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | | 68,604 | 359,787 | 766,939 | 1,195,330 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | | 26,278 | 137,985 | 221,161 | 385,424 | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 72,450 | 33,258 | 117,787 | 188,453 | 411,948 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (71,616 | ) | $ | 28,544 | $ | 148,810 | $ | 241,367 | $ | 347,105 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.09 | |||||
Basic common shares outstanding | 261,496 | 1,809,351 | 4,393,069 | 9,356,610 | 3,987,429 | |||||||||||
Diluted common shares outstanding | 261,496 | 1,829,351 | 4,413,069 | 9,376,610 | 4,007,429 |
F-34
The following table presents selected unaudited quarterly financial data for each quarter during the period ended December 31, 2002:
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
|||||||||||||
|
June 30, 2002 |
September 30, 2002 |
December 31, 2002 |
|||||||||||
Net loss before minority interest | $ | (13,300 | ) | $ | (17,500 | ) | $ | (181,912 | ) | $ | (212,712 | ) | ||
Minority Interest | | | 200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||||||
Total income | $ | (13,300 | ) | $ | (17,500 | ) | $ | 18,088 | $ | (12,712 | ) | |||
Earnings (loss) per common share: | ||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted | $ | (66.50 | ) | $ | (87.50 | ) | $ | 90.44 | $ | (63.56 | ) | |||
Basic and diluted common shares outstanding | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
Note 19Pro Forma Financial Information (unaudited)
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we acquired 93 industrial properties, aggregating approximately for a total expected investment of $604.6 million.
The following unaudited pro forma information for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, have been prepared to reflect the incremental effect of the acquisition of properties during 2004 by us as if such transactions and adjustments had occurred as of January 1, 2003, and were carried forward through December 31, 2004. As these acquisitions are assumed to have been made on January 1, 2003, the shares outstanding as of December 31, 2004, are assumed to have been sold as of January 1, 2003, for purposes of calculating per share information.
|
2004(1) |
2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | $ | 70,431,898 | $ | 53,070,842 | ||||
Depreciation | $ | 50,861,657 | $ | 47,875,147 | ||||
Net loss | $ | (11,272,945 | ) | $ | (16,966,408 | ) | ||
Loss per sharebasic and diluted | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | ||
Shares outstanding: | ||||||||
Basic | 67,719,883 | 67,719,883 | ||||||
Diluted | 67,739,883 | 67,739,883 | ||||||
(1) | The 93 industrial properties we acquired included the C&L Facilities. The C&L Facilities were constructed during 2004 and therefore no revenue, depreciation or amortization expenses have been reflected in the pro forma information above for the year ended December 31, 2003. |
This information is presented for illustrative purposes only and may not be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the acquisitions had been in effect on the dates indicated or which may be obtained in the future.
F-35
SCHEDULE IIIREAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company |
|
Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/2004 |
|
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Property |
No. of Bldgs |
Encumbrances |
Land |
Building & Improvements(1) |
Land |
Building & Improvements(1) |
Total Costs |
Accumulated Depreciation |
Acquisition Date |
||||||||||||
Newpoint I | 1 | 15,051,295 | 2,143,151 | 12,908,148 | | 2,143,151 | 12,908,148 | 15,051,299 | (511,662 | ) | 03/31/04 | ||||||||||
Southcreek | 3 | 36,441,321 | 5,337,800 | 31,640,607 | (537,086 | )(2) | 5,337,800 | 31,103,521 | 36,441,321 | (707,463 | ) | 6/8/2004/ 09/21/04 |
|||||||||
Eagles Landing | 1 | 16,208,909 | 2,595,450 | 13,474,873 | 138,586 | 2,595,450 | 13,613,459 | 16,208,909 | (463,209 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Buford Industrial | 1 | 8,496,368 | 1,474,565 | 7,021,803 | | 1,474,565 | 7,021,803 | 8,496,368 | (133,039 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Breckinridge Industrial | 2 | | 1,950,075 | 10,158,525 | | 1,950,075 | 10,158,525 | 12,108,600 | (290,479 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Westgate Industrial | 1 | 6,940,847 | 2,140,128 | 4,800,719 | | 2,140,128 | 4,800,719 | 6,940,847 | (217,323 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Westpark Industrial | 2 | | 2,176,470 | 6,718,293 | 79,910 | (2) | 2,176,470 | 6,798,203 | 8,974,673 | (68,330 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||
Cobb Industrial | 2 | 6,395,891 | 1,120,095 | 5,248,897 | 26,898 | 1,120,095 | 5,275,795 | 6,395,890 | (83,306 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Cabot Parkway Industrial | 2 | | 2,275,425 | 13,981,794 | (56,001 | )(2) | 2,275,425 | 13,925,793 | 16,201,218 | (271,993 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||
Atlanta NE Portolio | 2 | 17,708,926 | 2,817,450 | 14,891,476 | | 2,817,450 | 14,891,476 | 17,708,926 | (145,483 | ) | 11/05/04 | ||||||||||
Lotus Cars USA | 1 | | 1,028,700 | 2,103,403 | | 1,028,700 | 2,103,403 | 3,132,103 | (6,163 | ) | 12/03/04 | ||||||||||
TOTAL ATLANTA MARKET | 18 | 107,243,557 | 25,059,309 | 122,948,538 | (347,693 | ) | 25,059,309 | 122,600,845 | 147,660,154 | (2,898,450 | ) | ||||||||||
Progress Industrial | 2 | | 2,570,000 | 5,933,035 | (40,226 | )(2) | 2,570,000 | 5,892,809 | 8,462,809 | (129,384 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||
South Industrial | 1 | | 1,125,000 | 2,805,024 | (121,744 | )(2) | 1,125,000 | 2,683,280 | 3,808,280 | (14,351 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||
Technology Industrial | 1 | | 940,850 | 2,605,691 | | 940,850 | 2,605,691 | 3,546,541 | (66,916 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Sunnyslope Industrial | 1 | | 3,626,000 | 7,615,567 | | 3,626,000 | 7,615,567 | 11,241,567 | (171,207 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
TOTAL BOSTON MARKET | 5 | | 8,261,850 | 18,959,317 | (161,970 | ) | 8,261,850 | 18,797,347 | 27,059,197 | (381,858 | ) | ||||||||||
DFW | 1 | 10,988,058 | 980,666 | 10,392,174 | (384,782 | )(2)(3) | 980,666 | 10,007,392 | 10,988,058 | (755,804 | ) | 12/15/03 | |||||||||
Pinnacle | 2 | 28,821,045 | 1,587,762 | 27,853,498 | (620,215 | )(2)(3) | 1,587,762 | 27,233,283 | 28,821,045 | (1,525,901 | ) | 12/15/03 | |||||||||
Market Industrial | 5 | 16,988,405 | 1,480,500 | 15,507,905 | | 1,480,500 | 15,507,905 | 16,988,405 | (318,199 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Shiloh Industrial | 2 | 4,631,730 | 878,025 | 5,956,857 | | 878,025 | 5,956,857 | 6,834,882 | (169,676 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Perimeter Industrial | 2 | 3,179,534 | 261,150 | 2,901,182 | 17,203 | 261,150 | 2,918,385 | 3,179,535 | (55,958 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Avenue R Industrial I | 1 | 2,420,358 | 189,225 | 2,231,133 | | 189,225 | 2,231,133 | 2,420,358 | (54,828 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Avenue R Industrial II | 1 | 1,410,381 | 270,750 | 1,139,631 | | 270,750 | 1,139,631 | 1,410,381 | (65,947 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Westfork Center Industrial | 3 | 6,506,038 | 503,175 | 5,977,117 | 25,746 | 503,175 | 6,002,863 | 6,506,038 | (153,077 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Coasters Distribution Center | 1 | | 1,380,000 | 14,504,354 | | 1,380,000 | 14,504,354 | 15,884,354 | (44,851 | ) | 12/03/04 | ||||||||||
TOTAL DALLAS MARKET | 18 | 74,945,549 | 7,531,253 | 86,463,851 | (962,048 | ) | 7,531,253 | 85,501,803 | 93,033,056 | (3,144,241 | ) | ||||||||||
Interpark 70 | 1 | 8,949,122 | 1,383,117 | 7,566,005 | | 1,383,117 | 7,566,005 | 8,949,122 | (252,548 | ) | 09/30/04 | ||||||||||
TOTAL DENVER MARKET | 1 | 8,949,122 | 1,383,117 | 7,566,005 | | 1,383,117 | 7,566,005 | 8,949,122 | (252,548 | ) | |||||||||||
West by Northwest | 1 | 8,596,927 | 1,033,352 | 7,563,574 | | 1,033,352 | 7,563,574 | 8,596,926 | (499,338 | ) | 10/30/03 | ||||||||||
Bondesen Business. Park | 7 | 23,845,938 | 1,007,125 | 23,369,806 | (530,994 | )(2) | 1,007,125 | 22,838,812 | 23,845,937 | (1,036,615 | ) | 06/03/04 | |||||||||
Beltway 8 Business Park | 4 | 18,721,542 | 722,135 | 17,993,602 | 5,804 | 722,135 | 17,999,406 | 18,721,541 | (890,191 | ) | 06/03/04 | ||||||||||
Corporate Industrial | 2 | 4,601,795 | 612,930 | 3,988,865 | | 612,930 | 3,988,865 | 4,601,795 | (93,955 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Reed Industrial | 1 | 6,898,681 | 567,847 | 6,330,834 | | 567,847 | 6,330,834 | 6,898,681 | (150,703 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Julie Rivers Industrial | 2 | 3,394,593 | 272,198 | 3,122,394 | | 272,198 | 3,122,394 | 3,394,592 | (72,790 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Wynwood Industrial | 1 | 1,820,326 | 180,245 | 1,633,568 | 6,513 | 180,245 | 1,640,081 | 1,820,326 | (41,175 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Wynpark Industrial | 1 | 1,558,078 | 153,768 | 1,404,310 | | 153,768 | 1,404,310 | 1,558,078 | (39,928 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Siber Industrial | 1 | 5,386,455 | 742,043 | 4,644,412 | | 742,043 | 4,644,412 | 5,386,455 | (91,170 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
Greenbriar Industrial | 1 | | 1,200,008 | 7,998,182 | (65,981 | )(2) | 1,200,008 | 7,932,201 | 9,132,209 | (98,317 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||
TOTAL HOUSTON MARKET | 21 | 74,824,335 | 6,491,651 | 78,049,547 | (584,658 | ) | 6,491,651 | 77,464,889 | 83,956,540 | (3,014,182 | ) | ||||||||||
Mallard Lake | 1 | 11,369,570 | 2,561,328 | 8,808,242 | | 2,561,328 | 8,808,242 | 11,369,570 | (426,916 | ) | 10/29/03 | ||||||||||
TOTAL CHICAGO MARKET | 1 | 11,369,570 | 2,561,328 | 8,808,242 | | 2,561,328 | 8,808,242 | 11,369,570 | (426,916 | ) | |||||||||||
Plainfield | 1 | 15,139,213 | 1,394,147 | 14,268,864 | (523,798 | )(2)(4) | 1,394,147 | 13,745,066 | 15,139,213 | (616,554 | ) | 12/22/03 | |||||||||
TOTAL INDIANA MARKET | 1 | 15,139,213 | 1,394,147 | 14,268,864 | (523,798 | ) | 1,394,147 | 13,745,066 | 15,139,213 | (616,554 | ) | ||||||||||
Park West | 6 | 74,140,583 | 10,440,900 | 63,682,456 | 17,227 | 10,440,900 | 63,699,683 | 74,140,583 | (2,704,728 | ) | 12/15/03/ 06/08/04 |
||||||||||
Northwest Business Center | 1 | 4,784,562 | 299,200 | 4,485,362 | | 299,200 | 4,485,362 | 4,784,562 | (461,349 | ) | 05/23/04 | ||||||||||
TOTAL CINCINNATI MARKET | 7 | 78,925,145 | 10,740,100 | 68,167,818 | 17,227 | 10,740,100 | 68,185,045 | 78,925,145 | (3,166,077 | ) | |||||||||||
Trade Pointe III | 1 | 8,259,775 | 1,020,000 | 7,239,775 | | 1,020,000 | 7,239,775 | 8,259,775 | (125,081 | ) | 09/28/04 | ||||||||||
Riverport | 1 | 10,091,045 | 1,278,900 | 8,812,145 | | 1,278,900 | 8,812,145 | 10,091,045 | (545,420 | ) | 05/03/04 | ||||||||||
TOTAL LOUISVILLE MARKET | 2 | 18,350,820 | 2,298,900 | 16,051,920 | | 2,298,900 | 16,051,920 | 18,350,820 | (670,501 | ) |
F-36
SCHEDULE IIIREAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company |
|
Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/2004 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Costs Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Property |
No. of Bldgs |
Encumbrances |
Land |
Building & Improvements(1) |
Land |
Building & Improvements(1) |
Total Costs |
Accumulated Depreciation |
Acquisition Date |
|||||||||||||
Foothill Business Center | 3 | | 13,314,550 | 9,111,995 | | 13,314,550 | 9,111,995 | 22,426,545 | (72,415 | ) | 12/09/04 | |||||||||||
Rancho | 1 | 10,317,311 | 2,789,574 | 7,048,820 | 478,917 | (2) | 2,789,574 | 7,527,737 | 10,317,311 | (623,205 | ) | 12/17/03 | ||||||||||
TOTAL LOS ANGELES MARKET | 4 | 10,317,311 | 16,104,124 | 16,160,815 | 478,917 | 16,104,124 | 16,639,732 | 32,743,856 | (695,620 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cypress Park East | 2 | 15,687,080 | 2,627,100 | 13,054,660 | 5,320 | 2,627,100 | 13,059,980 | 15,687,080 | (294,195 | ) | 10/22/04 | |||||||||||
TOTAL ORLANDO MARKET | 2 | 15,687,080 | 2,627,100 | 13,054,660 | 5,320 | 2,627,100 | 13,059,980 | 15,687,080 | (294,195 | ) | ||||||||||||
North Industrial | 2 | 10,605,525 | 4,566,000 | 15,899,309 | (154,788 | )(2) | 4,566,000 | 15,744,521 | 20,310,521 | (277,054 | ) | 10/01/04 | ||||||||||
South Industrial I | 2 | 16,996,257 | 2,875,500 | 14,120,757 | | 2,875,500 | 14,120,757 | 16,996,257 | (205,611 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||||
South Industrial II | 1 | 6,136,893 | 1,234,500 | 4,902,393 | | 1,234,500 | 4,902,393 | 6,136,893 | (103,803 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||||
West Southern Industrial | 1 | 3,931,254 | 555,000 | 3,376,254 | | 555,000 | 3,376,254 | 3,931,254 | (71,441 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||||
West Geneva Industrial | 3 | 1,996,405 | 412,500 | 2,667,071 | | 412,500 | 2,667,071 | 3,079,571 | (64,452 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||||
West 24th Industrial | 2 | 3,330,187 | 870,000 | 4,575,267 | | 870,000 | 4,575,267 | 5,445,267 | (45,898 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||||
East Watkins Industrial | 1 | | 2,218,500 | 10,945,552 | | 2,218,500 | 10,945,552 | 13,164,052 | (164,048 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||||
Sky Harbor Transit Center | 1 | 10,131,396 | 2,534,310 | 7,597,086 | | 2,534,310 | 7,597,086 | 10,131,396 | (85,068 | ) | 11/24/04 | |||||||||||
TOTAL PHOENIX MARKET | 13 | 53,127,917 | 15,266,310 | 64,083,689 | (154,788 | ) | 15,266,310 | 63,928,901 | 79,195,211 | (1,017,375 | ) | |||||||||||
Rittman Business Park | 2 | 7,724,491 | 388,419 | 7,336,072 | | 388,419 | 7,336,072 | 7,724,491 | (459,756 | ) | 06/03/04 | |||||||||||
TOTAL SAN ANTONIO MARKET | 2 | 7,724,491 | 388,419 | 7,336,072 | | 388,419 | 7,336,072 | 7,724,491 | (459,756 | ) | ||||||||||||
Huntwood Industrial | 1 | 6,553,562 | 1,891,792 | 4,661,770 | | 1,891,792 | 4,661,770 | 6,553,562 | (186,929 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||||
Eden Rock Industrial | 2 | 6,689,020 | 1,942,752 | 4,746,268 | | 1,942,752 | 4,746,268 | 6,689,020 | (261,772 | ) | 10/01/04 | |||||||||||
Bayside Distribution Center | 2 | 22,128,638 | 6,874,740 | 15,253,898 | | 6,874,740 | 15,253,898 | 22,128,638 | (120,595 | ) | 11/03/04 | |||||||||||
TOTAL SAN FRANCISCO MARKET | 5 | 35,371,220 | 10,709,284 | 24,661,936 | | 10,709,284 | 24,661,936 | 35,371,220 | (569,296 | ) | ||||||||||||
Bridgestone/Firestone | 1 | 24,483,672 | 2,545,000 | 21,938,672 | | 2,545,000 | 21,938,672 | 24,483,672 | (1,303,465 | ) | 06/09/03 | |||||||||||
Park West International | 1 | 20,060,033 | 1,771,900 | 18,288,133 | | 1,771,900 | 18,288,133 | 20,060,033 | (492,593 | ) | 06/29/04 | |||||||||||
Eastgate | 1 | 14,796,664 | 1,445,321 | 13,351,343 | | 1,445,321 | 13,351,343 | 14,796,664 | (727,307 | ) | 03/19/04 | |||||||||||
TOTAL NASHVILLE MARKET | 3 | 59,340,369 | 5,762,221 | 53,578,148 | | 5,762,221 | 53,578,148 | 59,340,369 | (2,523,365 | ) | ||||||||||||
Chickasaw | 2 | 14,699,448 | 1,140,561 | 13,837,238 | (278,350 | )(2)(3) | 1,140,561 | 13,558,888 | 14,699,449 | (1,142,973 | ) | 07/22/03 | ||||||||||
Memphis Trade Center III | 1 | 24,859,076 | 2,335,000 | 22,524,076 | | 2,335,000 | 22,524,076 | 24,859,076 | (588,129 | ) | 06/22/04 | |||||||||||
TOTAL MEMPHIS MARKET | 3 | 39,558,524 | 3,475,561 | 36,361,314 | (278,350 | ) | 3,475,561 | 36,082,964 | 39,558,525 | (1,731,102 | ) | |||||||||||
GRAND TOTAL | 106 | 610,874,223 | 120,054,674 | 636,520,736 | (2,511,841 | ) | 120,054,674 | 634,008,895 | 754,063,569 | (21,862,036 | ) | |||||||||||
F-37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses of Memphis I for the year ended December 31, 2004. This financial statement is the responsibility of Memphis I's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement based upon our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses was prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and for inclusion in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., as described in Note 1. The presentation is not intended to be a complete presentation of Memphis I's revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the revenues and certain expenses of Memphis I for the year ended December 31, 2004, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.
/s/ EHRHARDT KEEFE STEINER & HOTTMAN PC
May 13,
2005
Denver, Colorado
F-38
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Memphis I
Statement of Revenues and Certain Expenses
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | |||||
Rental income | $ | 10,365,336 | |||
Other revenues | 1,826,992 | ||||
Total revenues | $ | 12,192,328 | |||
Certain expenses | |||||
Real estate taxes | $ | 705,316 | |||
Operating expenses | 709,325 | ||||
Insurance | 275,950 | ||||
Management fees | 160,490 | ||||
Total certain expenses | $ | 1,851,081 | |||
Excess of revenues over certain expenses | $ | 10,341,247 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.
F-39
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Notes to Statement of Revenues and Certain Expenses
Note 1Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses reflects the operations of Memphis I for the year ended December 31, 2004. Memphis I is located in Memphis, Tennessee and comprises 3,641,012 aggregate rentable square feet. As of December 31, 2004, Memphis I had an occupancy percentage of 100%.
Memphis I was acquired by Dividend Capital Trust Inc. (the "Company") from an unrelated party during the period beginning on February 2, 2005, and ending on May 13, 2005, for a total expected investment of approximately $132.7 million (which includes an acquisition fee of $1.3 million paid to Dividend Capital Advisors LLC, an affiliate), which was paid using net proceeds from the Company's public offerings and the assumption of four existing non-recourse mortgage loans.
The accounting records of Memphis I are maintained on the accrual basis. The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses was prepared pursuant to the Rule 3-14 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and excludes certain expenses such as mortgage interest, depreciation and amortization, professional fees and other costs not directly related to future operations of Memphis I. This statement is not intended to be a complete presentation of Memphis I's revenues and expenses.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The future results of operations can be significantly impacted by the rental market of the Memphis, Tennessee region as well as general overall economic conditions.
Note 2Operating Lease
Memphis I's revenues are primarily obtained from tenant rental payments as provided for under non-cancelable operating leases. Memphis I records rental revenue for the full term of the lease on a straight-line basis. In the case where the minimum rental payments increase over the life of the lease, Memphis I records a receivable due from the tenant for the difference between the amount of revenue recorded and the amount of cash received. This accounting treatment resulted in an increase in rental revenue of $1,665,324 for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Future minimum lease payments due under these leases for the next five years as of December 31, 2004, are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2005 | $ | 10,697,050 | |
2006 | 8,918,874 | ||
2007 | 7,588,324 | ||
2008 | 7,303,689 | ||
2009 | 7,376,229 | ||
Thereafter | 18,112,893 | ||
$ | 59,997,059 | ||
Tenant reimbursements of operating expenses are included in other revenues in the accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses.
F-40
The following table exhibits those tenants who accounted for greater than 10% of the rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004, and the corresponding percentage of the future minimum revenues above:
Tenant |
Industry |
Lease Expiration |
% of 2004 Revenues |
% of Future Minimum Revenues |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Technicolor Videocassette Inc. | Video Equipment Service Provider and Manufacturer | May 2006 & September 2014 | 39.7 | % | 44.9 | % | |||
United Stationers Supply Co. |
Wholesale Distributor of Business Products |
June 2010 |
18.9 |
% |
18.9 |
% |
|||
Toys "R" Us |
Toy Manufacturer |
May 2012 |
14.2 |
% |
19.5 |
% |
F-41
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses of the Baltimore-Washington Portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2004. This financial statement is the responsibility of Baltimore-Washington Portfolio's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement based upon our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses was prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and for inclusion in the registration statement (No. 333-122260) on Form S-11 of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., as described in Note 1. The presentation is not intended to be a complete presentation of Baltimore-Washington Portfolio's revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the revenues and certain expenses of Baltimore-Washington Portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2004, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.
/s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
June 3,
2005
Denver, Colorado
F-42
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Baltimore-Washington Portfolio
Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||||
Revenues | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 955,467 | $ | 3,846,618 | ||||
Other revenues | 150,807 | 490,332 | ||||||
Total revenues | $ | 1,106,274 | $ | 4,336,950 | ||||
Certain expenses | ||||||||
Real estate taxes | 117,966 | $ | 460,577 | |||||
Operating expenses | 86,086 | 214,991 | ||||||
Insurance | 21,127 | 80,085 | ||||||
Management fees | 24,681 | 114,300 | ||||||
Total certain expenses | 249,860 | $ | 869,953 | |||||
Excess of revenues over certain expenses | $ | 856,414 | $ | 3,466,997 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement.
F-43
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
Note 1Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses reflects the operations of the Baltimore-Washington Portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited). The Baltimore-Washington Portfolio is located in Baltimore, Maryland and comprises 874,455 aggregate rentable square feet. As of December 31, 2004, the Baltimore-Washington Portfolio had an occupancy percentage of 100%.
The Baltimore-Washington Portfolio was acquired by Dividend Capital Trust Inc. (the "Company") from an unrelated party on April 12, 2005, for a total expected investment of approximately $43.9 million (which includes an acquisition fee of $425,000 paid to Dividend Capital Advisors LLC, an affiliate), which was paid using net proceeds from the Company's public offerings and the assumption of an existing non-recourse mortgage loan.
The accounting records of the Baltimore-Washington Portfolio are maintained on the accrual basis. The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses was prepared pursuant to the Rule 3-14 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and excludes certain expenses such as mortgage interest, depreciation and amortization, professional fees and other costs not directly related to future operations of the Baltimore-Washington Portfolio. These statements are not intended to be a complete presentation of the Baltimore-Washington Portfolio's revenues and expenses.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The future results of operations can be significantly impacted by the rental market of the Baltimore, Maryland region as well as general overall economic conditions.
Interim Information (unaudited)
In the opinion of management, the unaudited information as of March 31, 2005, included herein contains all the adjustments necessary, which are of a normal recurring nature, to present fairly the revenues and certain expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year. Management is not aware of any material factors that would cause the information included herein to not be indicative of future operating results.
Note 2Operating Lease
The Baltimore-Washington Portfolio's revenues are primarily obtained from tenant rental payments as provided for under non-cancelable operating leases. The Baltimore-Washington Portfolio records rental revenue for the full term of the lease on a straight-line basis. In the case where the minimum rental payments increase over the life of the lease, the Baltimore-Washington Portfolio records a receivable due from the tenant for the difference between the amount of revenue recorded and the amount of cash received. This accounting treatment resulted in a decrease in rental revenue of $50,223 and $28,234 (unaudited) for the year ended December 31, 2004, and for the three months ended March 31, 2005, respectively.
F-44
Future minimum lease payments due under these leases for the next five years as of December 31, 2004, are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2005 | $ | 3,666,829 | |
2006 | 2,337,390 | ||
2007 | 1,930,919 | ||
2008 | 1,259,888 | ||
2009 | 735,589 | ||
Thereafter | 3,560,418 | ||
$ | 13,491,033 | ||
Tenant reimbursements of operating expenses are included in other revenues in the accompanying statement of revenue and certain expenses.
The following table exhibits those tenants who accounted for greater than 10% of the rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004, and the corresponding percentage of the future minimum revenues above:
Tenant |
Industry |
Lease Expiration |
% of 2004 Revenues |
% of Future Minimum Revenues |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pier One Imports | Home furnishings | 09/05 | 19.0 | % | 3.7 | % | |||
Elite Spice Inc. | Commercial foods | 04/08 | 21.3 | % | 20.9 | % | |||
Professional Mailing & Distribution | Warehousing, fulfillment and mail processing | 06/15 | 12.0 | % | 47.1 | % | |||
Microflex Corporation | Manufacturing | 01/06 | 11.6 | % | 3.7 | % |
F-45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses of Foothill Business Center ("Foothill") for the year ended December 31, 2003. This financial statement is the responsibility of Foothill's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based upon our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses was prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and for inclusion in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., as described in Note 1. The presentation is not intended to be a complete presentation of Foothill's revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the revenues and certain expenses of Foothill Business Center for the year ended December 31, 2003, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.
/s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
December 30,
2004
Denver, Colorado
F-46
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Foothill Business Center
Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||||
Revenues | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 1,453,014 | $ | 1,937,352 | ||||
Other revenues | 337,678 | 459,124 | ||||||
Total revenues | 1,790,692 | 2,396,476 | ||||||
Certain expenses | ||||||||
Real estate taxes | 169,280 | 223,671 | ||||||
Operating expenses | 83,366 | 126,389 | ||||||
Insurance | 29,538 | 38,645 | ||||||
Management fees | 55,494 | 70,926 | ||||||
Total certain expenses | 337,678 | 459,631 | ||||||
Excess of revenues over certain expenses | $ | 1,453,014 | $ | 1,936,845 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-47
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
(Information for September 30, 2004 is Unaudited)
Note 1Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses reflect the operations of the Foothill Business Center ("Foothill") for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Foothill consists of three buildings located in Lake Forest, California (a submarket of Los Angeles) comprising approximately 242,573 aggregate rentable square feet. As of December 31, 2003, Foothill had an occupancy percentage of 100%.
Foothill was acquired by Dividend Capital Trust Inc. ("the Company") from an unrelated party on December 9, 2004, for a total cost of approximately $22.4 million (which includes an acquisition fee of $221,000 paid to Dividend Capital Advisors LLC, an affiliate), which was paid using net proceeds from the Company's public offering.
The accounting records of Foothill are maintained on the accrual basis. The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses were prepared pursuant to Rule 3-14 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and exclude certain expenses such as mortgage interest, depreciation and amortization, professional fees and other costs not directly related to future operations of Foothill.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations can be significantly impacted by the rental market of the Lake Forest and Los Angeles, California region.
Interim Information (unaudited)
In the opinion of management, the unaudited information as of September 30, 2004, included herein contains all the adjustments necessary, which are of a normal recurring nature, to present fairly the revenues and certain expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year. Management is not aware of any material factors that would cause the information included herein to not be indicative of future operating results.
Note 2Operating Leases
Foothill's revenues are primarily obtained from tenant rental payments as provided for under non-cancelable operating leases. Foothill records rental revenues for the full term of the lease on a straight-line basis. In the case where the minimum rental payments increase over the life of the lease, Foothill records a receivable due from tenants for the difference between the amount of revenue recorded and the amount of cash received. This accounting treatment resulted in a decrease in rental revenue of $4,710 and $490 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, and the year ended December 31, 2003, respectively.
F-48
Future minimum lease payments due under these leases for the next five years, excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses, as of December 31, 2003, are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2004 | $ | 1,943,790 | |
2005 | 1,687,728 | ||
2006 | 706,764 | ||
2007 | 68,595 | ||
2008 | | ||
Thereafter | | ||
$ | 4,406,877 | ||
Tenant reimbursements of operating expenses are included in other revenue in the accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses.
The following table exhibits those tenants who accounted for greater than 10% of the rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003, and the corresponding percentage of the future minimum revenues above:
Tenant |
Industry |
Lease Expiration |
Percentage of 2003 Revenues |
Percentage of Future Minimum Revenues |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Manufacturer and Distributor of Electric Medical Equipment | September 2005 | 13 | % | 10 | % | |||
B | Self Storage REIT | April 2006 | 13 | % | 13 | % | |||
C | Computer Manufacturer | September 2005 | 41 | % | 32 | % | |||
D | Manufacturer and Distributor of RC Cars and Car Kits | December 2006 | 19 | % | 25 | % | |||
E | Manufacturer of Fiber Optic Lighting Products | March 2007 | 14 | % | 20 | % |
Certain leases above contain tenant lease renewal options for various periods under various terms that may or may not be similar to the existing leases.
F-49
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses of the RN Portfolio (the "Property") for the year ended December 31, 2003. This financial statement is the responsibility of the Property's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based upon our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses was prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and for inclusion in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., as described in Note 1. The presentation is not intended to be a complete presentation of the Property's revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the revenues and certain expenses of the RN Portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2003, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.
/s/ EHRHARDT KEEFE STEINER & HOTTMAN PC
December 10,
2004
Denver, Colorado
F-50
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
RN Portfolio
Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||||
Revenues | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 9,226,896 | $ | 17,805,823 | ||||
Other revenues | 2,233,306 | 4,505,251 | ||||||
Total revenues | 11,460,202 | 22,311,074 | ||||||
Certain expenses | ||||||||
Real estate taxes | 1,871,017 | 3,439,660 | ||||||
Operating expenses | 912,676 | 2,068,580 | ||||||
Insurance | 212,889 | 382,696 | ||||||
Management fees | 351,710 | 789,448 | ||||||
Total certain expenses | 3,348,292 | 6,680,384 | ||||||
Excess of revenues over certain expenses | $ | 8,111,910 | $ | 15,630,690 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-51
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
RN Portfolio
(Information for June 30, 2004 is Unaudited)
Note 1Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses reflect the operations of the RN Portfolio (the "Property") for the six months ended June 30, 2004 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Property consists of 53 bulk distribution, light industrial and service center facilities located in Atlanta, Georgia; Boston, Massachusetts; Dallas, Texas; Houston, Texas; Phoenix, Arizona; and San Francisco, California. The Property comprises approximately 4,890,753 aggregate rentable square feet. As of December 31, 2003, the Property had an occupancy percentage of 85%.
The Property was acquired by Dividend Capital Trust Inc. (the "Company") from unrelated parties on October 1, 2004 for a total cost of approximately $238.5 million (which includes an acquisition fee of approximately $2.3 million paid to Dividend Capital Advisors LLC, an affiliate), which was paid with proceeds from the issuance of debt and net proceeds from the Company's public offering.
The accounting records of the Property are maintained on the accrual basis. The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses were prepared pursuant to Rule 3-14 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and exclude certain expenses such as mortgage interest, depreciation and amortization, professional fees and other costs not directly related to future operations of the Property.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations can be significantly impacted by the rental market of the Atlanta, Boston, Dallas, Houston, Phoenix and San Francisco regions.
Interim Information (unaudited)
In the opinion of management, the unaudited information as of June 30, 2004 included herein contains all the adjustments necessary, which are of a normal recurring nature, to present fairly the revenues and certain expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year. Management is not aware of any material factors that would cause the information included herein to not be indicative of future operating results.
Note 2Operating Leases
The Property's revenue is obtained from tenant rental payments as provided for under non-cancelable operating leases. The Property records rental revenue for the full term of the lease on a straight-line basis. In the case where the minimum rental payments increase over the life of the lease, the Property records a receivable due from tenants for the difference between the amount of revenues recorded and the amount of cash received. This accounting treatment resulted in an increase in rental revenues of $377,599 and $410,005 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003, respectively.
F-52
Future minimum lease payments due under these leases for the next five years, excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses, as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2004 | $ | 17,380,554 | |
2005 | 15,496,037 | ||
2006 | 11,747,163 | ||
2007 | 8,960,457 | ||
2008 | 7,270,854 | ||
Thereafter | 19,486,554 | ||
$ | 80,341,619 | ||
Tenant reimbursements of operating expenses are included in other revenues in the accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, there were no tenants who accounted for greater than 10% of either rental revenues or future minimum revenues.
Certain leases contain tenant lease renewal options for various periods under various terms that may or may not be similar to the existing leases.
F-53
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenue and certain expenses of the Eagles Landing and South Creek I & II facilities ("Eagles Landing/South Creek") for the year ended December 31, 2003. This financial statement is the responsibility of Eagles Landing/South Creek's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based upon our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenue and certain expenses was prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and for inclusion in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., as described in Note 1. The presentation is not intended to be a complete presentation of Eagles Landing / South Creek's revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the revenue and certain expenses of the Eagles Landing and South Creek I & II facilities for the year ended December 31, 2003, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.
/s/ EHRHARDT KEEFE STEINER & HOTTMAN PC
August 18,
2004
Denver, Colorado
F-54
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Eagles Landing and South Creek I & II
Statements of Revenue and Certain Expenses
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||||
Revenues | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 731,917 | $ | 2,493,847 | ||||
Other revenues | 156,505 | 363,472 | ||||||
Total revenues | 888,422 | 2,857,319 | ||||||
Certain expenses | ||||||||
Real estate taxes | 95,572 | 305,253 | ||||||
Operating expenses | 39,227 | 190,313 | ||||||
Insurance | 21,452 | 84,278 | ||||||
Management fees | 11,407 | 45,913 | ||||||
Total certain expenses | 167,658 | 625,757 | ||||||
Excess of revenue over certain expenses | $ | 720,764 | $ | 2,231,562 | ||||
See notes to financial statements.
F-55
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
(Information for March 31, 2004 is Unaudited)
Note 1Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying statements of revenue and certain expenses reflect the operations of the Eagles Landing and South Creek I & II facilities ("Eagles Landing/South Creek") for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Eagles Landing/South Creek consists of two buildings in Fairburn, Georgia and one building in Stockbridge, Georgia, both are sub-markets of Atlanta. Eagles Landing/South Creek contains 1,257,874 aggregate rentable square feet collectively. As of December 31, 2003, Eagles Landing/South Creek had an occupancy rate of 100%.
Eagles Landing/South Creek was acquired by Dividend Capital Trust Inc. from an unrelated party on June 8, 2004 for a total cost, including acquisition costs, of approximately $36.5 million, which was paid with proceeds from a public offering. Such costs included an acquisition fee of $359,000 paid to an affiliate.
The accounting records of Eagles Landing/South Creek are maintained on the accrual basis. The accompanying statements of revenue and certain expenses were prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and exclude certain expenses such as mortgage interest, depreciation and amortization, professional fees and other costs not directly related to future operations of Eagles Landing/South Creek.
Eagles Landing/South Creek recognizes revenue from tenant leases on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease. The results of operations can be significantly impacted by the rental market of the Fairburn, Georgia and Stockbridge, Georgia regions.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Interim Information (unaudited)In the opinion of management, the unaudited information as of March 31, 2004 included herein contains all the adjustments necessary, which are of a normal recurring nature, to present fairly the revenue and certain expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year. Management is not aware of any material factors that would cause the information included herein to not be indicative of future operating results.
Note 2Operating Leases
Eagles Landing/South Creek's revenue is obtained from tenant rental payments as provided for under non-cancelable operating leases. Eagles Landing/South Creek records rental revenue for the full term of the lease on a straight-line basis. In the case where the minimum rental payments increase over the life of the lease, Eagles Landing/South Creek records a receivable due from tenants for the difference between the amount or revenue recorded and the amount of cash received. This accounting treatment resulted in an increase in rental revenue of $87,000 and $361,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003, respectively.
F-56
Future minimum lease payments due under these leases, excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses, as of December 31, 2003, are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2004 | $ | 1,904,118 | |
2005 | 1,880,845 | ||
2006 | 1,948,954 | ||
2007 | 2,017,062 | ||
2008 | 2,085,171 | ||
Thereafter | 5,974,879 | ||
$ | 15,811,029 | ||
Tenant reimbursements of operating expenses are included in Other revenue in the accompanying statements of revenue and certain expenses.
The following table exhibits those tenants who accounted for greater than 10% of the rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003, and the corresponding percentage of the future minimum revenues above:
Tenant |
Industry |
Lease Expiration |
% of 2003 Revenues |
% of Future Minimum Revenues |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Apparel Manufacturer | April 2010 | 26 | % | 37 | % | |||
B | Consumer Chemical Product Manufacturer | June 2004 | 40 | % | 4 | % | |||
C | Truck Manufacturer | February 2013 | 34 | % | 59 | % |
Certain leases above contain tenant lease renewal options for various periods under various terms that may or may not be similar to the existing leases.
F-57
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenue and certain expenses of the Parkwest and Mid-South Logistics distribution facilities ("Parkwest/Mid-South") for the year ended December 31, 2003. This financial statement is the responsibility of Parkwest/Mid-South's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based upon our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenue and certain expenses was prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and for inclusion in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., as described in Note 1. The presentation is not intended to be a complete presentation of Parkwest/Mid-South's revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the revenue and certain expenses of the Parkwest and Mid-South Logistics distribution facilities for the year ended December 31, 2003, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.
/s/ EHRHARDT KEEFE STEINER & HOTTMAN PC
August 10,
2004
Denver, Colorado
F-58
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Parkwest and Mid-South Logistics
Statements of Revenue and Certain Expenses
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||||
Revenues | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 1,293,788 | $ | 5,222,893 | ||||
Other revenues | 143,471 | 652,988 | ||||||
Total revenues | 1,437,259 | 5,875,881 | ||||||
Certain expenses | ||||||||
Real estate taxes | 84,633 | 362,207 | ||||||
Operating expenses | 79,168 | 209,491 | ||||||
Management fees | 23,993 | 100,972 | ||||||
Insurance | 15,481 | 72,780 | ||||||
Total certain expenses | 203,275 | 745,450 | ||||||
Excess of revenue over certain expenses | $ | 1,233,984 | $ | 5,130,431 | ||||
See notes to financial statements.
F-59
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
(Information for March 31, 2004 is Unaudited)
Note 1Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying statements of revenue and certain expenses reflect the operations of the Parkwest and Mid-South Logistics distribution facilities (collectively "Parkwest/Mid-South" and individually "Parkwest" and "Mid-South") for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Parkwest/Mid-South consists of three buildings located in Hebron, Kentucky, a sub-market of Cincinnati and one building in Lavergne, Tennessee, a sub-market of Nashville. Parkwest/Mid-South contains 1,719,600 aggregate rentable square feet collectively. As of December 31, 2003, Parkwest/Mid-South had an occupancy rate of 94%.
Parkwest/Mid-South was acquired by Dividend Capital Trust Inc. from an unrelated party on June 8, 2004 (Parkwest) and June 29, 2004 (Mid-South) for a total cost, including acquisition costs, of approximately $67.9 million, which was paid with proceeds from a public offering and the assumption of approximately $41.8 million in mortgage debt. Such costs included an acquisition fee of $643,500 paid to an affiliate.
The accounting records of Parkwest/Mid-South are maintained on the accrual basis. The accompanying statements of revenue and certain expenses were prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and exclude certain expenses such as mortgage interest, depreciation and amortization, professional fees and other costs not directly related to future operations of Parkwest/Mid-South.
Parkwest/Mid-South recognizes revenue from tenant leases on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease. The results of operations can be significantly impacted by the rental market of the Hebron, Kentucky and Lavergne, Tennessee regions.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Interim Information (unaudited)In the opinion of management, the unaudited information as of March 31, 2004 included herein contains all the adjustments necessary, which are of a normal recurring nature, to present fairly the revenue and certain expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year. Management is not aware of any material factors that would cause the information included herein to not be indicative of future operating results.
Note 2Operating Leases
Parkwest/Mid-South's revenue is obtained from tenant rental payments as provided for under non-cancelable operating leases. Parkwest/Mid-South records rental revenue for the full term of the lease on a straight-line basis. In this case, where the minimum rental payments increase over the life of the lease, Parkwest/Mid-South records a receivable due from tenants for the difference between the amount of revenue recorded and the amount of cash received. This accounting treatment resulted in a (decrease)/increase in rental revenue of $(20,000) and $22,000 for the periods ended March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
F-60
Future minimum lease payments due under these leases, excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses, as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2004 | $ | 5,240,365 | |
2005 | 5,246,845 | ||
2006 | 5,340,891 | ||
2007 | 5,110,195 | ||
2008 | 3,907,085 | ||
Thereafter | 9,589,703 | ||
$ | 34,435,084 | ||
Tenant reimbursements of operating expenses are included in other revenue in the accompanying statements of revenue and certain expenses.
The following table exhibits those tenants who accounted for greater than 10% of the rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003, and the corresponding percentage of the future minimum revenues above:
Tenant |
Industry |
Lease Expiration |
% of 2003 Revenues |
% of Future Minimum Revenues |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Delivery Service | June 2008 | 38 | % | 28 | % | |||
B | Engine Manufacturer | December 2012 | 18 | % | 27 | % | |||
C | Equipment Manufacturer | October 2011 | 24 | % | 30 | % |
Certain leases above contain tenant lease renewal options for various periods under various terms that may or may not be similar to the existing leases.
F-61
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenue and certain expenses of the Bondesen Business Park, Beltway 8 Business Park and Rittiman Business Park (collectively the "BBR Properties") for the year ended December 31, 2003. This financial statement is the responsibility of BBR Properties' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based upon our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statement is free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statement. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenue and certain expenses was prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and for inclusion in the Current Report on Form 8-K of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., as described in Note 1. The presentation is not intended to be a complete presentation of the BBR Properties revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the revenue and certain expenses of Bondesen Business Park, Beltway 8 Business Park and Rittiman Business Park for the year ended December 31, 2003, on the basis of accounting described in Note 1.
/s/ EHRHARDT KEEFE STEINER & HOTTMAN PC
August 6,
2004
Denver, Colorado
F-62
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Bondesen Business Park, Beltway 8 Business Park and Rittiman Business Park
Statements of Revenue and Certain Expenses
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||||
Revenues | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 1,094,677 | $ | 3,648,619 | ||||
Other revenues | 351,521 | 1,101,011 | ||||||
Total revenues | 1,446,198 | 4,749,630 | ||||||
Certain expenses | ||||||||
Real estate taxes | 231,422 | 925,686 | ||||||
Operating expenses | 148,465 | 535,977 | ||||||
Insurance | 30,618 | 135,399 | ||||||
Management fees | 42,638 | 156,638 | ||||||
Total certain expenses | 453,143 | 1,753,700 | ||||||
Excess of revenue over certain expenses | $ | 993,055 | $ | 2,995,930 | ||||
See notes to financial statements.
F-63
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Notes to Statements of Revenues and Certain Expenses
(Information for March 31, 2004 is Unaudited)
Note 1Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying statements of revenue and certain expenses reflect the operations of the Bondesen Business Park, Beltway 8 Business Park and Rittiman Business Park (collectively "BBR Properties") for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2003. The BBR Properties consist of six service centers and five distribution facilities located in Houston, Texas and two distribution facilities located in San Antonio, Texas. The BBR Properties contain 798,412 rentable square feet collectively. As of December 31, 2003, the BBR Properties had an occupancy percentage of 78%.
The BBR Properties were acquired by Dividend Capital Trust Inc. from an unrelated party on June 3, 2004 for a total cost, including acquisition costs, of approximately $50.8 million, which was paid with proceeds from a public offering. Such costs included an acquisition fee of $500,000 paid to an affiliate.
The accounting records of BBR Properties are maintained on the accrual basis. The accompanying statements of revenue and certain expenses has been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and excludes certain expenses such as mortgage interest, depreciation and amortization, professional fees and other costs not directly related to future operations of BBR Properties.
BBR Properties recognizes revenue from tenant leases on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease. The results of operations can be significantly impacted by the rental market of the Houston, Texas and San Antonio, Texas regions.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Interim Information (unaudited)
In the opinion of management, the unaudited information as of March 31, 2004 included herein contains all the adjustments necessary, which are of a normal recurring nature, to present fairly the revenue and certain expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year. Management is not aware of any material factors that would cause the information included herein to not be indicative of future operating results except as it relates to the tenant buy-out in February 2004, as discussed in Note 2, which resulted in $190,000 in revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
Note 2Operating Leases
BBR Properties' revenue is obtained from tenant rental payments as provided for under non-cancelable operating leases. BBR Properties records rental revenue for the full term of the lease on a straight-line basis. In this case, where the minimum rental payments increase over the life of the lease, BBR Properties records a receivable due from tenants for the difference between the amount of revenue recorded and the amount of cash received. This accounting treatment resulted in an increase
F-64
in rental revenue of approximately $32,000 and $26,000 for the periods ended March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments due under these leases, excluding tenant reimbursements of operating expenses, as of December 31, 2003, are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
2004 | $ | 3,808,786 | |
2005 | 3,525,126 | ||
2006 | 2,888,198 | ||
2007 | 2,491,516 | ||
2008 | 1,341,994 | ||
Thereafter | 2,478,838 | ||
$ | 16,534,458 | ||
Tenant reimbursements of operating expenses are included in other revenue in the accompanying statements of revenue and certain expenses.
The following table exhibits those tenants who accounted for greater than 10% of the rental revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003, and the corresponding percentage of the future minimum revenues above:
Tenant |
Industry |
Lease Expiration |
% of 2003 Revenues |
% of Future Minimum Revenues |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Disaster Restoration | August 2011 | 20 | % | 22 | % | |||
B | Graphic Design | December 2007 and October 2011 | 12 | % | 19 | % | |||
C | Wholesale Electrical Distribution | October 2005 | 10 | % | 4 | % |
In February 2004, tenant A above entered into an agreement to buy out a portion of its lease for $190,000 pursuant to the terms of the agreement of which $100,000 has been collected. The future minimum lease payments and related percentages above reflect the agreement. Certain leases above contain tenant lease renewal options for various periods under various terms that may or may not be similar to the existing leases.
F-65
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
As of March 31, 2005 |
As of December 31, 2004 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||
Land | $ | 134,763,015 | $ | 120,054,674 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements | 646,484,879 | 572,284,194 | ||||||||
Intangible lease asset | 74,022,096 | 61,724,701 | ||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (34,980,397 | ) | (21,862,036 | ) | ||||||
Net Investment in Real Estate | 820,289,593 | 732,201,533 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
146,294,961 |
23,520,267 |
||||||||
Restricted cash | 4,854,224 | 5,414,224 | ||||||||
Notes receivable | 8,178,700 | 4,238,700 | ||||||||
Deferred loan costs, net | 8,766,087 | 7,156,477 | ||||||||
Deferred acquisition costs and deposits | 4,062,413 | 5,406,882 | ||||||||
Straight line rent and other receivables | 7,250,054 | 5,704,063 | ||||||||
Other assets, net | 3,238,850 | 1,166,124 | ||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,002,934,882 | $ | 784,808,270 | ||||||
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 7,151,587 | $ | 6,302,922 | ||||||
Dividends payable | 11,743,700 | 9,737,171 | ||||||||
Tenant prepaids and security deposits | 4,316,005 | 4,038,534 | ||||||||
Other liabilities | 1,768,495 | 2,842,538 | ||||||||
Intangible lease liability, net | 7,095,937 | 5,518,657 | ||||||||
Line of credit | 8,000 | 4,000 | ||||||||
Mortgage notes | 223,122,178 | 142,754,768 | ||||||||
Financing obligations | 50,094,047 | 32,394,877 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities | 305,299,949 | 203,593,467 | ||||||||
Minority Interest |
1,000 |
1,000 |
||||||||
Shareholders' Equity: |
||||||||||
Preferred shares, 50,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | | | ||||||||
Shares-in-trust, 100,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | | | ||||||||
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 350,000,000 shares authorized, 81,319,720 and 67,719,883 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively | 813,197 | 677,199 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 739,804,605 | 611,440,163 | ||||||||
Distributions in excess of earnings | (40,961,055 | ) | (26,635,877 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (2,022,814 | ) | (4,267,682 | ) | ||||||
Total Shareholders' Equity | 697,633,933 | 581,213,803 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | $ | 1,002,934,882 | $ | 784,808,270 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-66
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
||||||
REVENUE: | ||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 15,932,724 | $ | 2,981,658 | ||||
Other real estate income | 3,669,321 | 600,253 | ||||||
Interest income | 610,390 | 13,324 | ||||||
Total Revenue | 20,212,435 | 3,595,235 | ||||||
EXPENSES: |
||||||||
Real estate taxes | 2,435,255 | 400,948 | ||||||
Operating expenses | 2,383,529 | 396,902 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense | 12,350,161 | 1,646,277 | ||||||
Interest expense | 3,717,621 | 650,588 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | 727,875 | 328,074 | ||||||
Asset management fees, related party | 1,179,473 | | ||||||
Total Expenses | 22,793,914 | 3,422,789 | ||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(2,581,479 |
) |
$ |
172,446 |
|||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING | ||||||||
Basic | 74,420,520 | 16,579,579 | ||||||
Diluted | 74,400,520 | 16,599,579 | ||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE | ||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.01 | |||
Diluted | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.01 | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-67
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity
and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Distributions in Excess of Earnings |
Total Shareholders' Equity |
||||||||||||||||
|
Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2004 | 67,719,883 | $ | 677,199 | $ | 611,440,163 | $ | (26,635,877 | ) | $ | (4,267,682 | ) | $ | 581,213,803 | ||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | | | | (2,581,478 | ) | | (2,581,478 | ) | |||||||||||
Net unrealized change in cash flow hedging derivatives | | | | | 2,132,981 | 2,132,981 | |||||||||||||
Amortization of cash flow hedging derivatives | | | | | 111,887 | 111,887 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss | (336,610 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares, net of offering costs | 13,719,787 | 137,198 | 129,544,954 | | | 129,682,152 | |||||||||||||
Redemption of common shares | (119,950 | ) | (1,200 | ) | (1,187,227 | ) | | | (1,188,427 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of stock options | | | 6,715 | | | 6,715 | |||||||||||||
Dividends on common shares | | | | (11,743,700 | ) | | (11,743,700 | ) | |||||||||||
Balances, March 31, 2005 | 81,319,720 | $ | 813,197 | $ | 739,804,605 | $ | (40,961,055 | ) | $ | (2,022,814 | ) | $ | 697,633,933 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-68
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2005 |
2004 |
||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (2,581,479 | ) | $ | 172,446 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization | 12,350,161 | 1,646,277 | ||||||||
Other depreciation and amortization | 829,391 | 88,415 | ||||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets | (559,868 | ) | 765,603 | |||||||
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 714,440 | 424,118 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 10,752,645 | 3,096,859 | ||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||
Real estate investments | (76,519,815 | ) | (29,705,374 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in deferred acquisition costs | 1,344,468 | (9,720 | ) | |||||||
Increase in notes receivable | (3,940,000 | ) | (1,498,000 | ) | ||||||
Master lease payments | 1,101,758 | 270,838 | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (78,013,589 | ) | (30,942,256 | ) | ||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from line of credit | 20,004,000 | 1,900,000 | ||||||||
Payments on line of credit | (20,000,000 | ) | (1,000,000 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from mortgage notes | 57,000,000 | | ||||||||
Principal payments on mortgage notes | (413,715 | ) | (97,529 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from financing obligations | 17,958,176 | 1,931,153 | ||||||||
Principal payments on financing obligations | (361,279 | ) | (11,747 | ) | ||||||
Increase in deferred loan costs | (2,153,558 | ) | (1,073,315 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from subscription of common shares | 904,478 | | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of common shares | 137,690,989 | 100,171,405 | ||||||||
Offering costs for issuance of common shares, related party | (13,579,065 | ) | (9,482,332 | ) | ||||||
Redemption of common shares | (1,188,427 | ) | | |||||||
Decrease in restricted cash | 560,000 | | ||||||||
Settlement of cash flow hedging derivative | (1,822,344 | ) | | |||||||
Distributions to common shareholders | (4,563,617 | ) | (790,859 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 190,035,638 | 91,546,776 | ||||||||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | $ | 122,774,694 | $ | 63,701,379 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
$ |
23,520,267 |
$ |
4,076,642 |
||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period | $ | 146,294,961 | $ | 67,778,021 | ||||||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information | ||||||||||
Cash paid for interest expense | $ | 3,807,607 | $ | 660,250 | ||||||
Assumption of secured debt in connection with real estate acquired | $ | 22,465,464 | $ | | ||||||
Amount issued pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan | $ | 5,173,529 | $ | 683,085 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-69
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization
Dividend Capital Trust Inc. was formed as a Maryland corporation in April 2002 in order to invest in commercial real estate properties, consisting primarily of high-quality, generic distribution warehouses and light industrial properties net leased to creditworthy corporate customers. We have qualified as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") for federal tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2003. We are structured as an umbrella partnership REIT ("UPREIT") under which substantially all of our current and future business is and will be conducted through a majority owned subsidiary, Dividend Capital Operating Partnership LP (our partnership), a Delaware limited partnership, and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of our partnership. As used herein, "Dividend Capital", "we" and "us" refer to Dividend Capital Trust Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries except where the context otherwise requires.
Our day to day activities are managed by Dividend Capital Advisors LLC (our advisor), an affiliate, under the terms and conditions of an advisory agreement. Our advisor is currently majority owned and/or controlled by three of our directors and certain officers and/or their affiliates and other third parties. In addition, under the terms of a dealer manager agreement, Dividend Capital Securities LLC (the "Dealer Manager") serves as the dealer manager of our public and private offerings. The Dealer Manager is currently majority owned and/or controlled by three of our directors and certain officers and/or their affiliates and other third parties. Our advisor and the Dealer Manager receive compensation and fees for services relating to our offerings and for the investment and management of our assets (see "Note 8Related Party Transactions").
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with GAAP. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004, and related notes thereto.
Principles of Consolidation
Our financial statements and the financial statements of our subsidiaries are consolidated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
F-70
Use of Estimates
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revision are reflected in the period they are determined to be necessary.
Investment in Real Estate
We capitalize direct costs associated with the acquisition, development or improvement of real estate, including acquisition fees paid to our advisor. Costs associated with acquisition or development pursuits are capitalized as incurred and if the pursuit is abandoned, these costs are expensed in the period in which the pursuit is abandoned.
Upon acquisition, the total estimated cost of a property is allocated to land, building, land improvements, tenant improvements and intangible lease assets and liabilities pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations" ("SFAS No. 141"). The allocation of the total estimated cost to land, building, land improvements and tenant improvements is based on our estimate of their fair value based on all available information such as appraisals, property condition reports and other related information. Pursuant to SFAS No. 141, the difference between the fair value and the face value of debt assumed in an acquisition should be recorded as a premium or discount and amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt assumed. The valuation of assumed liabilities is based on the current market rate for similar liabilities. The allocation of the total estimated cost of a property to an intangible lease asset includes the value associated with the in-place leases which may include leasing commissions, legal and other costs. In addition, the allocation of the total cost of a property requires allocating costs to an intangible asset or liability resulting from in-place leases being above or below the market rental rates on the date of the acquisition. This asset or liability will be amortized over the life of the remaining in-place leases as an adjustment to rental revenue.
Real estate, including land, building, building and land improvements, tenant improvements and leasing costs, and intangible lease assets and liabilities are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives as follows:
Description |
Standard Depreciable Life |
|
---|---|---|
Land | Not depreciated | |
Building | 40 years | |
Building and land improvements | 10 to 20 years | |
Tenant improvements and leasing costs | Term of lease | |
Intangible lease assets and liabilities | Average term of leases for building | |
Above/below market rent assets/liabilities | Term of lease |
The table above reflects the standard depreciable lives typically used to compute depreciation and amortization. However, such depreciable lives may be shorter based on the estimated useful life of such
F-71
assets or liabilities. Maintenance and repair expenditures are expensed as incurred and improvements are capitalized. The cost of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation and/or amortization will be removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss will be reflected in operations in the period in which such sale or retirement occurs.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in financial institutions and other highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes certain cash held in escrow in connection with property acquisitions, utility deposits, real estate tax payments and issuance of mortgage debt.
Long-lived Assets
Long-lived assets to be held and used will be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We periodically evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets based on estimated future cash flows and the estimated liquidation value of such long-lived assets, and provide for impairment if such undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. If impaired, the long-lived asset will be written down to its estimated fair value.
Debt
Debt consists of fixed rate secured mortgage debt and our senior secured revolving credit facility. The fixed rate secured mortgage debt includes a premium, net of accumulated amortization, of $3.8 million as of March 31, 2005.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net loss, net unrealized gain in cash flow hedging derivatives and amortization of hedging derivatives, which were approximately $(2.6) million, $2.1 million and $112,000, respectively, as of March 31, 2005. We report comprehensive income (loss) in our condensed consolidated statement of shareholders' equity and other comprehensive income (loss). Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to settled and assigned hedging transactions will be amortized to interest expense over the life of our hedged debt issuance(s). Changes in the fair value of unsettled hedging transactions are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. Any ineffectiveness, as defined by SFAS No. 133 (defined below), related to our hedging transactions are reported on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, there were no gains or losses recognized related to ineffectiveness on our hedging activities (see "Note 4Hedging Activities").
F-72
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133"), as amended and interpreted, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. As required by SFAS No. 133, we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the designation of the derivative. Derivatives used to hedge exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitments attributable to a particular risk are considered "fair value" hedges. Derivatives used to hedge exposure to variability in expected future interest payments, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered "cash flow" hedges. As of March 31, 2005, none of our derivatives were designated as fair value hedges.
For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of the derivative that represent changes in expected future cash flows that are effectively hedged by the derivative are initially reported in other comprehensive income (loss) on the balance sheet (i.e., not included in earnings) until the derivative is settled. Upon settlement, the effective portion of the derivative, or cash flow hedge, is recognized in other comprehensive income and amortized over the term of designated cash flow or transaction the derivative was intended to hedge. Any change in value of the derivative that is deemed to be ineffective is charged directly to earnings when the determination of ineffectiveness is made. We assess the effectiveness of each cash flow hedge relationship by comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and currently all of our derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges.
Our objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, we primarily use treasury locks in our cash flow hedging strategy. A treasury lock is designed to mitigate the risk of future interest rate fluctuations by providing a future fixed interest rate for a limited, pre-determined period of time. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, such derivatives were used to hedge the variability in future interest expense associated with forecasted issuances of debt.
Revenue Recognition
We record rental revenue for the full term of each lease on a straight-line basis. Certain properties have leases that provide for customer occupancy during periods that no rent is due or where minimum rent payments increase during the term of the lease. Accordingly, we record a receivable from customers that we expect to collect over the remaining lease term rather than currently, which will be recorded as deferred rents receivable. When we acquire a property, the term of existing leases is considered to commence as of the acquisition date for the purposes of this calculation. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, the total increase to rental revenues due to straight line rent adjustments was $800,501 and $117,994, respectively.
In connection with property acquisitions, we may acquire leases with rental rates above and/or below the market rental rates measured at the date of acquisition. Such differences are recorded as an intangible asset or liability pursuant to SFAS No. 141 and amortized to rental revenues over the life of
F-73
the respective leases. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, the total net decrease to rental revenues due to the amortization of above and below market rents was $443,037 and $14,008, respectively.
In connection with certain property acquisitions, we have entered into master lease agreements with various sellers whereby the sellers are obligated to pay monthly rent until the earlier of the expiration of the master lease agreement or commencement of rent from a new customer. For financial reporting purposes, rental payments under master lease agreements are reflected as a reduction of the basis of the underlying property rather than rental revenue. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, the total master lease payments received were approximately $1.1 million and $271,000, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
We have a stock-based employee compensation plan and an independent director compensation plan. We account for these plans under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," and its related interpretations. As of March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, we had 60,000 options outstanding under the Director Stock Option Plan. As of March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, 107,500 options had been granted under the Employee Stock Option Plan. Options granted under both the Director Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Option Plan are valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and are amortized to salary expense on a straight-line basis over the period during which the right to exercise such options fully vests. Such expense is included in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment ("SFAS 123R"). This statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123. This statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. Management is still assessing the impact of SFAS 123R which we are required to adopt no later than January 1, 2006, although early adoption is permitted.
Basic and Diluted Net Income per Common Share
Basic net income per common share is determined by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share includes the effects of potentially issuable common stock, but only if dilutive, including the presumed exchange of limited partnership units for common shares (see "Note 7Minority Interest").
F-74
Note 2Real Estate
Acquisitions
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we acquired six properties located in three different target markets for a total estimated cost of approximately $100.3 million, including acquisition fees paid to our advisor. These properties were acquired using net proceeds from our public and private offerings and the assumption of approximately $22.5 million in mortgage debt, excluding a premium of approximately $1.5 million (see "Note 3Debt").
Wickes Distribution CenterChicago, Illinois
On January 5, 2005, we acquired a distribution facility ("Wickes") comprising 440,000 square feet located in Central DuPage County, a submarket of Chicago. As of March 31, 2005, Wickes was 100% leased. Wickes was acquired for a total estimated cost of approximately $21.7 million, including acquisition fees paid to our advisor.
Technicolor II, Shelby 4, Shelby 5 and Shelby 19 Distribution FacilitiesMemphis, Tennessee
In connection with our purchase agreement with Panattoni Development Company LLC, an unrelated third party, we acquired the Technicolor II Distribution Facility ("Technicolor"), Shelby 4 Distribution Facility ("Shelby 4"), Shelby 5 Distribution Facility ("Shelby 5") and the Shelby 19 Distribution Facility ("Shelby 19") on February 2, February 16, March 7 and March 18, 2005, respectively. These properties are located in Memphis, Tennessee and combined for approximately 2.0 million total rentable square feet. As of March 31, 2005, the aforementioned facilities were collectively 100% leased. We purchased these facilities for a total estimated cost of approximately $73.4 million, including acquisition fees paid to our advisor. We assumed mortgage debt of approximately $22.5 million, which excludes a premium of approximately $1.5 million, associated with the acquisition of these properties (see "Note 3Debt").
Iron Run Corporate CenterPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania
On March 21, 2005, we purchased a distribution facility ("Iron Run") comprising 100,000 square feet located in the Lehigh Valley, a submarket of Philadelphia. As of March 31, 2005, Iron Run was 100% leased. We purchased Iron Run for a total estimated cost of approximately $5.2 million, including acquisition fees paid to our advisor.
F-75
Note 3Debt
As of March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, our debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance as of |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Stated Interest Rate |
Effective Interest Rate(4) |
Maturity Date |
March 31, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 |
|||||||||
Secured Mortgage Debt: | ||||||||||||||
ING Investment Management(2) | 4.40% | 5.42% | January 2010 | $ | 57,000,000 | $ | | |||||||
ING Investment Management(2) | 5.31% | 5.34% | January 2015 | 55,000,000 | 55,000,000 | |||||||||
New York Life | 5.00% | 5.00% | March 2011 | 39,748,376 | 39,953,415 | |||||||||
Assumed Secured Mortgage Debt: | ||||||||||||||
Principal(1) | 7.08% | 4.81% | July 2008 | 17,061,397 | 17,174,107 | |||||||||
State Farm(1) | 6.72% | 5.62% | November 2022 | 12,702,660 | | |||||||||
Prudential(1) | 6.40% | 6.09% | November 2012 | 12,700,000 | 12,700,000 | |||||||||
Principal(1) | 7.21% | 4.81% | July 2008 | 11,521,586 | 11,570,162 | |||||||||
Prudential(1) | 5.69% | 5.22% | December 2013 | 8,254,722 | | |||||||||
Principal(1) | 6.22% | 4.18% | September 2012 | 3,819,410 | 3,838,755 | |||||||||
Legacy(1) | 7.40% | 5.21% | December 2017 | 1,480,037 | | |||||||||
Weighted Avg./Totals(3) | 5.44% | 5.26% | $ | 219,288,188 | $ | 140,236,439 | ||||||||
Premiums, Net of Amortization(1) | 3,833,990 | 2,518,329 | ||||||||||||
Carrying Value of Debt | $ | 223,122,178 | $ | 142,754,768 | ||||||||||
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility: | ||||||||||||||
JP Morgan | 5.75% | 5.75% | February 2007 | $ | 8,000 | $ | 4,000 | |||||||
In January 2005, we entered into $57.0 million of secured, non-recourse debt with a stated fixed interest rate of 4.40% which matures in 2010. The underlying notes require monthly payments of interest only until January 1, 2006 at which time monthly payments of principal and interest will be required. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we assumed three secured, non-recourse notes, totaling $22.5 million, excluding premiums, in conjunction with the acquisition of three properties (see "Note 2Real Estate"). These assumed notes bear fixed interest rates ranging from
F-76
5.69% to 7.40% and require monthly payments of principal and interest. The maturity dates of such assumed notes range from December 2013 to November 2022. Pursuant to SFAS No. 141, the difference between the fair value and face value of these assumed notes at the date of acquisition resulted in a premium of approximately $1.5 million, which will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the underlying notes.
We have a senior secured revolving credit facility with a current capacity of $225 million with a syndicated group led by JP Morgan Securities (formerly BankOne). The credit facility currently bears interest at either LIBOR plus 1.125% to 1.500%, or, at our election, the prime rate and is subject to an annual 0.250% facility fee. This credit facility contains various covenants including financial covenants regarding net worth, interest and fixed charge coverage and consolidated leverage.
As of March 31, 2005, the gross book value of all our properties was approximately $855.3 million and the total gross book value of all properties securing our fixed rate mortgage debt and secured credit facility was approximately $353.4 million and $282.4 million, respectively. Our debt has various covenants and management believes we were in compliance with all of these covenants as of March 31, 2005.
Note 4Hedging Activities
We continue to enter into forward treasury locks in anticipation of issuing future fixed rate debt to fund future property acquisitions. We are entering into such treasury locks to hedge our exposure to the variability in interest rates and are therefore mitigating the risk of changes in future payments of interest for anticipated fixed rate debt issuances over a maximum period of 12 months (excluding forecasted transactions related to the payment of variable interest on our existing senior secured revolving credit facility). As required by SFAS 133, we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. These forward treasury lock hedges have been designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes.
As of March 31, 2005, we had entered into a total of six cash flow hedging transactions, of which three have been settled. Of the three settled hedges, two have been attributed to fixed rate debt and the balances of such hedges are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the assigned debt, and the third hedge was re-hedged on the date of settlement. The three unsettled hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) at their fair value. As of March 31, 2005, these outstanding derivatives with a fair value of $2.4 million were included in other assets. Unrealized gains of $2.1 million and $150,000 were recorded during the first quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively, to shareholders' equity and comprehensive income as a result of the change in fair value of the outstanding hedges.
As of March 31, 2005, the total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) balance pertaining to the cash flow hedges was approximately $2.0 million. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to cash flow hedges will be amortized to interest expense as interest payments are made on our anticipated future debt issuance. During the next 12 months, we estimate that $528,000 will be amortized from other comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense resulting in an increase of our interest expense.
F-77
Note 5Public Offerings
On June 28, 2004, we filed our third registration statement with the Securities Exchange Commission ("SEC") covering a public offering of our common stock and the registration statement was declared effective on October 18, 2004. The common stock is being offered at a price of $10.50 per share for a maximum of 40,000,000 shares. The registration statement also covers up to 13,000,000 shares available pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. We will continue to sell shares under this offering and potential follow-on offerings, providing capital primarily for acquisitions. As of March 31, 2005, we had sold 25,190,548 shares pursuant to our third public offering for gross proceeds of approximately $264.1 million.
On January 24, 2005, we filed our fourth registration statement with the SEC covering one or more public offerings of our common stock with gross offering proceeds of up to $1.0 billion, including proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan. As of March 31, 2005, this registration statement had not been declared effective.
Note 6Our Partnership's Private Placement
Our partnership is currently offering undivided tenancy-in-common interests in our properties to accredited investors in a private placement exempt from registration under the Securities Act. We anticipate that these tenancy-in-common interests may serve as replacement properties for investors seeking to complete like-kind exchange transactions under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, the tenancy-in-common interests sold to investors will be 100% leased by our partnership, and such leases will contain purchase options whereby our partnership will have the right, but not the obligation, to acquire the tenancy-in-common interests from the investors at a later point in time in exchange for limited partnership units in our partnership under Section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Our partnership will pay certain up-front fees and reimburse certain related expenses to our advisor, the Dealer Manager and Dividend Capital Exchange Facilitators LLC (the "Facilitator") for raising capital through the private placement. Our advisor is obligated to pay all of the offering and marketing related costs associated with the private placement. However, our partnership is obligated to pay our advisor a non-accountable expense allowance which equals 2% of the gross equity proceeds raised through the private placement. In addition, our partnership is obligated to pay the Dealer Manager a dealer manager fee of up to 1.5% of gross equity proceeds raised and a commission of up to 5% of gross equity proceeds raised through the private placement. The Dealer Manager may re-allow such commissions and a portion of such dealer manager fee to participating broker dealers. Our partnership is also obligated to pay a transaction facilitation fee to the Facilitator, an affiliate of our advisor, of up to 1.5% of gross equity proceeds raised through the private placement.
During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we raised approximately $18.0 and $1.9 million, respectively, from the sale of undivided tenancy-in-common interests in our properties, which is included in financing obligations in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets pursuant to SFAS No. 98 "Accounting for Leases" ("SFAS No. 98"). In accordance with SFAS No. 98, a portion of the rental payments made by our partnership to owners of tenancy-in-common interests will be recognized by our partnership as interest expense using the interest method.
F-78
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, our partnership incurred upfront costs of approximately $1.6 million and $190,000, respectively, payable to our advisor and other affiliates for affecting these transactions which are recorded as deferred loan costs. Such deferred loan costs are amortized to interest expense over the life of the financing obligation. If our partnership elects to exercise any purchase option as described above and issue limited partnership units, the unamortized portion of the up-front fees and expense reimbursements paid to affiliates with respect to such transactions will be recorded against shareholders' equity as a selling cost of the limited partnership units. If our partnership does not elect to exercise any such purchase option, the remaining unamortized portion of the up-front fees and expense reimbursements paid to affiliates with respect to such transactions will be considered in the calculation of a gain or loss on the sale of real estate. On April 8, 2005, our partnership issued approximately $4.45 million of limited partnership units in conjunction with the exercise of a purchase option for a property in which it had sold tenancy-in-common interests (see "Note 9Subsequent Events").
Note 7Minority Interest
Minority interest consists of the following as of:
Partnership Units |
March 31, 2005 |
December 31, 2004 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Limited partnership units | $ | | $ | | ||
Limited partnership Special Units | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||
Total | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,000 | ||
Limited Partnership Units
At March 31, 2005, our partnership was approximately 99.9% owned by Dividend Capital and 0.1% by our advisor. Limited partnership units are redeemable at the option of the unit holder. We, as the general partner of our partnership, have the option of redeeming the limited partnership units with cash or with common shares. At inception (April 12, 2002), our partnership issued 20,000 limited partnership units to our advisor for gross proceeds of $200,000. The allocation of net loss to the limited partnership unit holders for the period ended December 31, 2002, had reduced the minority interest balance to zero. The excess loss attributable to the minority interest will be applied to future income attributable to the minority interest.
Limited Partnership Special Units
During 2002, our partnership issued 10,000 Special Units to an affiliate of our advisor for consideration of $1,000. The holder of the Special Units does not participate in the profits and losses of our partnership. Amounts distributable to the holder of the Special Units will depend on operations and the amount of net sales proceeds received from property dispositions or upon other events. In general, after holders of regular partnership interests in aggregate have received cumulative distributions equal to their capital contributions plus a 7% cumulative non-compounded annual pre-tax return on their net contributions, the holder of the Special Units and the holders of regular partnership
F-79
interests will receive 15% and 85%, respectively, of the net sales proceeds received by our partnership upon the disposition of our partnership's assets.
Note 8Related Party Transactions
Advisory Agreement
We have entered into an Advisory Agreement with our advisor pursuant to which we will pay certain acquisition and asset management fees to our advisor. Our advisor is considered a related party as certain indirect owners and employees of our advisor serve as our executives. The amount of such acquisition fees is equal to 1% of the aggregate purchase price of properties we acquire. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, our advisor earned approximately $965,000 and $775,000, respectively, for acquisition fees which are accounted for as part of the basis of the acquired properties.
We pay our advisor an asset management fee equal to 0.75% per annum of the total undepreciated cost of the properties we own in excess of $170 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we incurred asset management fees of $1.2 million. We did not incur any asset management fees during the three months ended March 31, 2004, as the total undepreciated cost of our properties did not exceed the aforementioned threshold of $170 million.
Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, our advisor is obligated to advance all of our organization and offering costs subject to its right to be reimbursed for such costs by us in an amount up to 2% of the aggregate gross offering proceeds raised. Such organization and offering costs include, but are not limited to, actual legal, accounting, printing and other expenses attributable to organizing Dividend Capital, preparing the SEC registration statement, qualification of the shares for sale in the states and filing fees incurred by our advisor, as well as reimbursements for marketing, salaries and direct expenses of its employees while engaged in registering and marketing the shares, other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee (see below). During the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, our advisor incurred approximately $2.1 and $1.9 million of organization and offering costs, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, we reimbursed our advisor approximately $2.8 and $1.9 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2005, the net un-reimbursed amount of organization and offering costs incurred by our advisor, since inception (April 12, 2002), was approximately $4.2 million. If we are not successful in raising additional amounts of equity proceeds, no additional amounts will be payable by us to our advisor for reimbursement of organization and offering costs.
Our advisor is obligated to pay all of the offering and marketing related costs associated with our partnership's private placement. However, our partnership is obligated to pay our advisor a non-accountable expense allowance which equals 2% of the gross proceeds raised through our partnership's private placement. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, our partnership incurred approximately $321,000 and $57,000, respectively, payable to our advisor for such expense allowance.
In accordance with the Advisory Agreement we are obligated, subject to certain limitations, to reimburse our advisor for certain other expenses incurred on our behalf for providing services contemplated in the Advisory Agreement, provided that our advisor does not receive a specific fee for
F-80
the activities which generate the expenses to be reimbursed. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, we have reimbursed $92,644 and $49,766, respectively, of such expenses. Such amounts are recorded as general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
As of March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, we owed our advisor approximately $609,000 and $576,000, respectively, which is included in other liabilities on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Dealer Manager Agreement
We have entered into a Dealer Manager Agreement with the Dealer Manager pursuant to which we will pay a dealer manager fee of up to 2.0% of gross offering proceeds raised pursuant to our public offerings to the Dealer Manager as compensation for managing the offering. The Dealer Manager may re-allow a portion of such fees to broker-dealers who participate in the offering. We will also pay up to a 6% sales commission of gross offering proceeds raised pursuant to our public offerings. As of March 31, 2005, all sales commissions had been re-allowed to participating broker-dealers. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, we incurred approximately $10.8 million and $8.0 million, respectively, payable to the Dealer Manager for dealer manager fees and sales commissions. Such amounts are included as a reduction of additional paid-in capital on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
We have also entered into a dealer manager agreement with the Dealer Manager pursuant to which we will pay a dealer manager fee of up to 1.5% of the gross proceeds raised through our partnership's private placement. We will also pay the Dealer Manager a sales commission up to 5.0% of the gross proceeds raised through our partnership's private placement. As of March 31, 2005, substantially all of the sales commissions were re-allowed to participating broker-dealers who are responsible for affecting sales. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, we incurred up front fees of approximately $1.0 million and $85,000, respectively, payable to the Dealer Manager for dealer manager fees and sales commissions. Such amounts are included in deferred loan costs on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the financing obligation (see "Note 6Our Partnership's Private Placement").
Pursuant to our first and second public offerings, the Dealer Manager earned one soliciting dealer warrant for every 25 shares sold. The holder of a soliciting dealer warrant has the right to purchase one share of common stock for $12. No warrants are being offered in our third public offering. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Dealer Manager did not earn any soliciting dealer warrants as all shares sold during such period were in connection with our third public offering (see "Note 5Public Offerings"). During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Dealer Manager earned approximately 410,000 soliciting dealer warrants in connection with our first public offering. As of March 31, 2005, the Dealer Manager had earned a total of approximately 2,200,000 warrants and using the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123, the estimated fair value of the warrants earned as of March 31, 2005, was approximately $1,613,000. These warrants do not have an impact on our condensed consolidated statement of operations as the value of these warrants is a cost of raising capital and therefore deducted from additional paid-in capital within shareholder's equity.
F-81
As of March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, we owed the Dealer Manager approximately $709,000 and $828,000, respectively, in relation to the fees described above which is included in other liabilities on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Facilitator Agreement
We have entered into an agreement with the Facilitator whereby we will pay a transaction facilitation fee associated with our partnership's private placement. We will pay the Facilitator up to 1.5% of the gross equity proceeds raised through our partnership's private placement for the transaction facilitation fee. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, we incurred approximately $241,000 and $29,000, respectively, payable to the Facilitator.
Note 9Subsequent Events
Private Placement Transaction
In connection with our partnership's private placement (see "Note 6Our Partnership's Private Placement"), on April 8, 2005, our partnership exercised its right to acquire a previously identified replacement property from seven individual investors in exchange for limited partnership units in our partnership. The exchange resulted in the issuance of 424,352 limited partnership units with a total value of approximately $4.5 million.
Purchase of Baltimore Portfolio
On April 12, 2005, we acquired a portfolio consisting of seven distribution facilities and comprising 874,701 square feet located in Baltimore, Maryland. Upon acquisition, the portfolio was 100% leased to 15 customers. We purchased the portfolio for a total estimated cost of approximately $43.2 million, which includes an acquisition fee of $425,000 paid to our advisor.
F-82
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Pro Forma Financial Information
(Unaudited)
The following pro forma financial statements have been prepared to provide pro forma information with regards to the properties acquired during 2004 and 2005. We acquired each of these facilities from unrelated third parties.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet presents the historical financial information of the Company as of March 31, 2005, as adjusted for acquisitions made subsequent to March 31, 2005, the issuance of our common stock and the assumption of debt subsequent to March 31, 2005, as if these transactions had occurred on March 31, 2005.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005, combine our historical operations with (i) the incremental effect of properties acquired during 2005, (ii) the issuance and assumption of debt and (iii) the issuance of the Company's common stock, as if these transactions had occurred on January 1, 2005. This pro forma statement of operations does not contemplate additional general and administrative expenses that are probable as such expenses are not readily determinable.
The accompanying unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004, combine our historical operations with (i) the incremental effect of properties acquired during 2004, (ii) the historical operations of properties acquired subsequent to December 31, 2004, (iii) the issuance and assumption of debt and (iv) the issuance of our common stock, as if these transactions had occurred on January 1, 2004. This pro forma statement of operations does not contemplate additional general and administrative expenses that are probable as such expenses are not readily determinable.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management based upon the historical financial statements of the Company and the individually acquired properties. These pro forma statements may not be indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the combination had been in effect on the dates indicated or which may be obtained in the future. The pro forma financial statements should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements included in the Company's previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2005 and its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2005.
F-83
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
DCT Historical(1) |
Acquisitions |
Other Pro Forma Adjustments |
Pro Forma Consolidated |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investment in real estate, net | $ | 820,289,593 | $ | 119,499,703 | (2) | $ | | $ | 939,789,296 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 146,294,961 | (77,281,683) | (2) | 52,511,063 | (3) | 121,524,341 | |||||||
Other assets, net | 36,350,328 | | | 36,350,328 | |||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 1,002,934,882 | $ | 42,218,020 | $ | 52,511,063 | $ | 1,097,663,965 | |||||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |||||||||||||
Mortgage note | $ | 223,122,178 | $ | 41,904,485 | (2) | $ | | $ | 265,026,663 | ||||
Line of credit | 8,000 | | | 8,000 | |||||||||
Financing obligation | 50,094,047 | | | 50,094,047 | |||||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities | 32,075,724 | 313,535 | (2) | | 32,389,259 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities | 305,299,949 | 42,218,020 | | 347,517,969 | |||||||||
Minority Interest |
1,000 |
|
|
1,000 |
|||||||||
Shareholders' Equity: |
|||||||||||||
Common stock | 697,633,933 | | 52,511,063 | (3) | 750,144,996 | ||||||||
Total Shareholders' Equity | 697,633,933 | | 52,511,063 | 750,144,996 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | $ | 1,002,934,882 | $ | 42,218,020 | $ | 52,511,063 | $ | 1,097,663,965 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this pro forma consolidated financial statement.
F-84
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Notes to Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)
Shares Sold Subsequent to March 31, 2005, through May 13, 2005 | 5,556,726 | ||
Gross Proceeds | $ | 58,345,626 | |
Less Selling Costs | 5,834,563 | ||
Net Proceeds | $ | 52,511,063 | |
F-85
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Quarter March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
DCT Historical(1) |
2005 Acquisitions |
Other Pro Forma Adjustments |
Pro Forma Consolidated |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVENUE: | |||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 20,212,435 | $ | 4,041,333 | (2) | $ | (10,187) | (6) | $ | 24,243,581 | |||||
Total Income | 20,212,435 | 4,041,333 | (10,187 | ) | 24,243,581 | ||||||||||
EXPENSES: |
|||||||||||||||
Other Operating Expenses | 4,818,784 | 773,538 | (2) | | 5,592,322 | ||||||||||
Depreciation & amortization | 12,350,161 | 2,640,239 | (3) | | 14,990,400 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 3,717,621 | 836,732 | (4) | | 4,554,353 | ||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 727,875 | | | 727,875 | |||||||||||
Asset management fees, related party | 1,179,473 | 313,535 | (5) | | 1,493,008 | ||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | 22,793,914 | 4,564,044 | | 27,357,958 | |||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | (2,581,479 | ) | $ | (522,711 | ) | $ | (10,187 | ) | $ | (3,114,377 | ) | |||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 74,420,520 | | 12,454,925 | 86,875,445 | (7) | ||||||||||
Diluted |
74,400,520 |
|
12,494,925 |
86,895,445 |
(7) |
||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|||||||||
Basic and diluted |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this pro forma consolidated financial statement.
F-86
Notes to Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
|
Acquisition Date |
Rental Revenues |
Operating Expenses |
Revenues in Excess of Expenses |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wicke's Distribution Center | 1/05/2005 | $ | 14,908 | $ | 1,779 | $ | 13,129 | |||||
Iron Run Corporate Center | 3/21/2005 | 103,451 | 21,059 | 82,392 | ||||||||
Miami Service Center | 4/7/2005 | 137,393 | 55,656 | 81,737 | ||||||||
Delta Portfolio | 4/12/2005 | 1,078,313 | 216,300 | 862,013 | ||||||||
Miami Commerce Center | 4/13/2005 | 326,987 | 81,416 | 245,571 | ||||||||
Memphis I | 2/02/2005 thru 5/13/2005 |
2,380,281 | 397,328 | 1,982,953 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 4,041,333 | $ | 773,538 | $ | 3,267,795 | ||||||
The properties above were acquired with the net proceeds raised from the Company's public offerings and the assumption of debt.
|
Acquisition Date |
Land |
Building and Other Costs |
Total Cost |
Incremental Depreciation and Amortization |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wicke's Distribution Center | 1/05/2005 | $ | 3,190,980 | $ | 18,535,450 | $ | 21,726,430 | $ | 15,175 | ||||||
Iron Run Corporate Center | 3/21/2005 | 1,530,796 | 3,667,495 | 5,198,291 | 73,710 | ||||||||||
Miami Service Center | 4/7/2005 | 785,905 | 4,223,823 | 5,009,728 | 64,363 | ||||||||||
Delta Portfolio | 4/12/2005 | 6,846,702 | 36,797,386 | 43,644,088 | 560,725 | ||||||||||
Miami Commerce Center | 4/13/2005 | 2,026,600 | 10,891,897 | 12,918,497 | 165,973 | ||||||||||
Memphis I | 2/02/2005 thru 5/13/2005 |
19,095,348 | 113,608,808 | 132,704,156 | 1,760,293 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 33,476,331 | $ | 187,724,859 | $ | 221,201,190 | $ | 2,640,239 | |||||||
F-87
Amount |
Note |
Interest Rate |
Incremental Interest Expense |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$121,369,949 | Secured, non-recourse debt | Annual interest rate varying from 4.4% to 7.4% | $ | 836,372 | |||
Total | $ | 836,372 | |||||
F-88
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Unaudited)
|
DCT Historical(1) |
2004 Acquisitions |
2005 Acquisitions |
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Other Pro Forma Consolidated |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVENUE: | ||||||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 35,553,182 | $ | 34,981,573 | (2) | $ | 20,261,536 | (5) | $ | (937,250 | )(8) | $ | 89,859,041 | |||||
Total Income | 35,553,182 | 34,981,573 | 20,261,536 | (937,250 | ) | 89,859,041 | ||||||||||||
EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||||
Other Operating Expenses | 7,204,725 | 8,690,211 | (2) | 3,532,719 | (5) | | 19,427,655 | |||||||||||
Depreciation & amortization | 19,273,357 | 26,719,067 | (3) | 13,736,657 | (6) | | 59,729,081 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | 5,977,888 | 1,210,602 | (4) | 9,605,450 | (4) | | 16,793,940 | |||||||||||
General and administrative expenses | 2,371,591 | | | | 2,371,591 | |||||||||||||
Asset management fees, related party | 1,525,194 | 2,804,196 | (7) | 1,636,072 | (7) | | 5,965,462 | |||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses | 36,352,755 | 39,424,076 | 28,510,898 | | 104,287,729 | |||||||||||||
Other Income: |
||||||||||||||||||
Gain on Hedging Activities | 544,561 | | | | 544,561 | |||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | (255,012 | ) | $ | (4,442,503 | ) | $ | (8,249,362 | ) | $ | (937,250 | ) | $ | (13,884,127 | ) | |||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING | ||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 37,907,838 | | | 48,967,607 | 86,875,445 | (9) | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
37,927,838 |
|
|
48,967,607 |
86,895,445 |
(9) |
||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
||||||||||||
Basic and diluted |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this pro forma consolidated financial statement.
F-89
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
Notes to Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Unaudited)
|
Acquisition Date |
Rental Revenues |
Operating Expenses |
Revenues in Excess of Expenses |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eastgate Distribution Center III | 3/19/2004 | $ | 447,437 | $ | 86,824 | $ | 360,613 | |||||
Newpoint Place I | 3/31/2004 | 333,875 | 66,511 | 267,364 | ||||||||
Northwest and Riverport Centers | 5/03/2004 | 534,002 | 85,462 | 448,540 | ||||||||
BBR Properties | 6/03/2004 | 2,447,412 | 766,857 | 1,680,555 | ||||||||
Parkwest/Mid-South | 6/08/2004 / 6/29/2004 |
2,511,255 | 355,173 | 2,156,082 | ||||||||
Eagles Landing/South Creek | 6/08/2004 | 1,552,298 | 292,941 | 1,259,357 | ||||||||
Memphis TradeCenter | 6/22/2004 | 1,025,489 | 119,448 | 906,041 | ||||||||
Trade Pointe III | 9/28/2004 | 607,866 | 86,315 | 521,551 | ||||||||
Interpark 70 | 9/30/2004 | 612,891 | 175,901 | 436,990 | ||||||||
RN Portfolio | 10/01/2004 | 17,253,271 | 5,040,835 | 12,212,436 | ||||||||
Cypress | 10/22/2004 | 1,379,465 | 360,777 | 1,018,688 | ||||||||
Bayside Distribution Center | 11/03/2004 | 1,745,670 | 362,145 | 1,383,525 | ||||||||
Norcross | 11/05/2004 | 723,808 | 198,836 | 524,972 | ||||||||
Sky Harbor Distribution Center | 11/24/2004 | 971,172 | 269,472 | 701,700 | ||||||||
C&L | 12/03/2004 | 594,029 | | 594,029 | ||||||||
Foothill Business Center | 12/09/2004 | 2,241,633 | 422,714 | 1,818,919 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 34,981,573 | $ | 8,690,211 | $ | 26,291,362 | ||||||
The properties above were acquired with the net proceeds raised from the Company's public offerings and the assumption of debt.
F-90
lease for tenant improvements and for other intangible assets based on the preliminary purchase price allocation in accordance with SFAS No. 141.
|
Acquisition Date |
Land |
Building and Other Costs |
Total Cost |
Incremental Depreciation and Amortization |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eastgate Distribution Center III | 3/19/2004 | $ | 1,445,321 | $ | 13,351,343 | $ | 14,796,664 | $ | 165,792 | ||||||
Newpoint Place I | 3/31/2004 | 2,143,152 | 12,908,143 | 15,051,295 | 157,215 | ||||||||||
Northwest Business Center and Riverport Commerce Center | 5/03/2004 | 1,578,100 | 13,236,421 | 14,814,521 | 488,283 | ||||||||||
BBR Properties | 6/03/2004 | 2,117,679 | 48,668,372 | 50,786,051 | 1,618,547 | ||||||||||
Parkwest/Mid-South | 6/08/2004 / 6/29/2004 |
8,864,800 | 59,077,004 | 67,941,804 | 1,496,997 | ||||||||||
Eagles Landing/South Creek | 6/08/2004 | 5,253,300 | 31,245,223 | 36,498,523 | 1,053,134 | ||||||||||
Memphis TradeCenter | 6/22/2004 | 2,335,000 | 22,524,076 | 24,859,076 | 528,777 | ||||||||||
Trade Pointe III | 9/28/2004 | 1,020,000 | 7,239,775 | 8,259,775 | 298,852 | ||||||||||
Interpark 70 | 9/30/2004 | 1,383,117 | 7,566,005 | 8,949,122 | 586,898 | ||||||||||
RN Portfolio | 10/01/2004 | 39,512,385 | 198,963,568 | 238,475,953 | 14,334,833 | ||||||||||
Cypress | 10/22/2004 | 2,627,100 | 13,054,660 | 15,681,760 | 1,101,566 | ||||||||||
Bayside Distribution Center | 11/03/2004 | 6,874,740 | 15,253,898 | 22,128,638 | 761,347 | ||||||||||
Norcross | 11/05/2004 | 2,817,450 | 14,891,476 | 17,708,926 | 965,612 | ||||||||||
Sky Harbor Distribution Center | 11/24/2004 | 2,534,310 | 7,597,086 | 10,131,396 | 558,445 | ||||||||||
C&L | 12/03/2004 | 2,408,700 | 16,607,757 | 19,016,457 | 1,116,665 | ||||||||||
Foothill Business Center | 12/09/2004 | 13,314,550 | 9,111 995 | 22,426,545 | 1,486,104 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 96,229,704 | $ | 491,296,802 | $ | 587,526,506 | $ | 26,719,067 | |||||||
F-91
Amount |
Note |
Interest Rate |
Incremental Interest Expense |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$4,000 | Senior secured revolving credit facility | Annual interest rate at LIBOR plus 1.125% to 1.500% or prime, at the election of Dividend Capital (approximately 5.25% as of December 31, 2004). | $ | 158 | |||
$221,988,901 | Secured, non-recourse debt including premium, net | Annual interest rate varying from 4.4% to 7.4% | $ | 10,815,894 | |||
Total | $ | 10,816,052 | |||||
|
Acquisition Date |
Rental Revenues |
Operating Expenses |
Revenues in Excess of Expenses |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wicke's Distribution Center | 1/05/2005 | $ | 1,364,081 | $ | 162,817 | $ | 1,201,264 | |||||
Iron Run Corporate Center | 3/21/2005 | 479,280 | 97,567 | 381,713 | ||||||||
Miami Service Center | 4/7/2005 | 552,590 | 223,846 | 328,744 | ||||||||
Delta Portfolio | 4/12/2005 | 4,358,121 | 869,953 | 3,488,168 | ||||||||
Miami Commerce Center | 4/13/2005 | 1,315,136 | 327,455 | 987,681 | ||||||||
Memphis I | 2/02/2005 thru 5/13/2005 |
12,192,328 | 1,851,081 | 10,341,247 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 20,261,536 | $ | 3,532,719 | $ | 16,728,817 | ||||||
The properties above were acquired with net proceeds raised from the Company's public offerings and debt.
F-92
tenant improvements and for other intangible assets based on the purchase price allocation in accordance with SFAS No. 141.
|
Acquisition Date |
Land |
Building and Other Costs |
Total Cost |
Incremental Depreciation and Amortization |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wicke's Distribution Center | 1/05/2005 | $ | 3,190,980 | $ | 18,535,450 | $ | 21,726,430 | $ | 1,384,721 | ||||||
Iron Run Corporate Center | 3/21/2005 | 1,530,796 | 3,667,495 | 5,198,291 | 340,560 | ||||||||||
Miami Service Center | 4/7/2005 | 785,905 | 4,223,823 | 5,009,728 | 258,161 | ||||||||||
Delta Portfolio | 4/12/2005 | 6,846,702 | 36,797,386 | 43,644,088 | 2,249,063 | ||||||||||
Miami Commerce Center | 4/13/2005 | 2,026,600 | 10,891,897 | 12,918,497 | 665,715 | ||||||||||
Memphis I | 2/02/2005 thru 5/13/2005 |
19,095,348 | 113,608,808 | 132,704,156 | 8,838,437 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 33,476,331 | $ | 187,724,859 | $ | 221,201,190 | $ | 13,736,657 | |||||||
F-93
APPENDIX A
SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The undersigned, by signing and delivering a copy of the attached Subscription Agreement Signature Page, hereby tenders this subscription and applies for the purchase of the number of shares of common stock ("Shares") of Dividend Capital Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), set forth on such Subscription Agreement Signature Page. Payment for the Shares is hereby made by check payable to "Dividend Capital Trust Inc."
I hereby acknowledge receipt of the Prospectus of the Company dated June 27, 2005 (as amended and/or supplemented from time to time, the "Prospectus"). I agree that if this subscription is accepted, it will be held, together with the accompanying payment, on the terms described in the Prospectus. I agree that subscriptions may be rejected in whole or in part by the Company in its sole and absolute discretion. Sale of Shares pursuant to this Subscription Agreement will not be effective until at least five business days after the date I have received a final prospectus and until I have received a confirmation of purchase.
Prospective investors should be aware that:
A-1
SPECIAL NOTICES
FOR CALIFORNIA RESIDENTS ONLY
CONDITIONS RESTRICTING TRANSFER OF SHARES
Section 260.141.11 Restrictions on Transfer:
A-2
"IT IS UNLAWFUL TO CONSUMMATE A SALE OR TRANSFER OF THIS SECURITY, OR ANY INTEREST THEREIN, OR TO RECEIVE ANY CONSIDERATION THEREFOR, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EXCEPT AS PERMITTED IN THE COMMISSIONER'S RULES."
FOR MAINE, MASSACHUSETTS, MINNESOTA,
MISSOURI AND NEBRASKA RESIDENTS ONLY
In no event may a subscription for Shares be accepted until at least five business days after the date the subscriber receives the Prospectus. Residents of the States of Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri and Nebraska who first received the Prospectus only at the time of subscription may receive a refund of the subscription amount upon request to Dividend Capital within five days of the date of subscription.
REGISTRATION OF SHARES
The following requirements have been established for the various types of ownership in which Shares may be held and registered. Subscription Agreements must be executed and supporting material must be provided in accordance with these requirements.
A-3
A-4
Dividend Capital Trust Inc.
a Maryland corporation
NOTICE TO STOCKHOLDER OF ISSUANCE
OF UNCERTIFICATED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
Containing the Information Required by Section 2-211 of the
Maryland General Corporation Law
To: Stockholder
From: Evan H. Zucker, President
Shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
Dividend Capital Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), is issuing to you, subject to acceptance by the Company, the number of shares of its common stock (the "Shares") set forth in your subscription agreement with the Company. The Shares do not have physical certificates. Instead, the Shares are recorded on the books and records of the Company, and this notice is given to you of certain information relating to the Shares. All capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings defined in the Company's Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Articles of Incorporation (the "Articles of Incorporation"), as the same may be amended from time to time, a copy of which, including the restrictions on transfer and ownership, will be furnished to each holder of Shares of the Company on request and without charge. Requests for such a copy may be directed to the Secretary of the Company at its principal office.
The Company has the authority to issue shares of stock of more than one class. Upon the request of any stockholder, and without charge, the Company will furnish a full statement of the information required by Section 2-211 of the Maryland General Corporation Law with respect to certain restrictions on ownership and transferability, the designations and any preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms and conditions of redemption of the shares of each class of stock which the Company has authority to issue, the differences in the relative rights and preferences between the shares of each series to the extent set, and the authority of the Board of Directors to set such rights and preferences of subsequent series. Such requests must be made to the Secretary of the Company at its principal office.
The Shares are subject to restrictions on transfer and ownership for the purpose of maintenance of the Company's status as a real estate investment trust (a "REIT") under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Except as otherwise provided pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation, no Person may (i) Beneficially or Constructively Own any class of Common Shares of the Company in excess of 9.8% (or such greater percent as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company) of such outstanding Common Shares; (ii) Beneficially or Constructively Own shares of any series of Preferred Shares of the Company in excess of 9.8% (or such greater percent as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company) of the outstanding shares of such series of Preferred Shares; (iii) Beneficially or Constructively Own Common Shares or Preferred Shares (of any class or series) which would result in the Company being "closely held" under Section 856(h) of the Code; or (iv) Constructively Own Common Shares or Preferred Shares that would cause the Company to Constructively Own 9.9% or more of the ownership interests in a tenant of the Company's, the Operating Partnership's or a Subsidiary's real property, within the meaning of Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code or which otherwise would cause the Company to fail to qualify as a REIT. Any Person who has Beneficial or Constructive Ownership, or who Acquires or attempts to Acquire Beneficial or Constructive Ownership of Common Shares and/or Preferred Shares in excess of the above limitations and any Person who Beneficially or Constructively Owns Shares-in-Trust as a
A-5
transferee of Common or Preferred Shares resulting in an exchange for Shares-in-Trust immediately must notify the Company in writing or, in the event of a proposed or attempted Transfer or Acquisition or purported change in Beneficial or Constructive Ownership, must give written notice to the Company at least 15 days prior to the proposed or attempted transfer, transaction or other event. Any Transfer or Acquisition of Common Shares and/or Preferred Shares or other event which results in a violation of the ownership or transfer limitations set forth in the Articles of Incorporation shall be void AB INITIO and none of the Purported Beneficial or Record Transferees or the purported Beneficial or Record Holders shall have or acquire any rights in such Common Shares and/or Preferred Shares. If the transfer and ownership limitations referred to herein are violated, the Common Shares or Preferred Shares represented hereby automatically will be exchanged for Shares-in-Trust to the extent of violation of such limitations, and such Shares-in-Trust will be held in trust by a trustee appointed by the Company, all as provided by the Articles of Incorporation. All defined terms used in this legend have the meanings identified in the Articles of Incorporation, as the same may be amended from time to time, a copy of which, including the restrictions on transfer, will be sent without charge to each Stockholder who so requests.
A-6
INSTRUCTIONS TO SIGNATURE PAGE
Please refer to the following instructions in completing the Signature Page contained below. Failure to follow these instructions may result in the rejection of your subscription.
A-7
IF YOU NEED FURTHER ASSISTANCE IN COMPLETING THIS SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT SIGNATURE PAGE, PLEASE CALL (303) 228-2200.
A-8
Special Instructions:
DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC.
SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT SIGNATURE PAGE
See the Prospectus for application explanation.
1. |
INVESTMENTSee payment instructions on back. |
|||||||||||||
/ / | This is an Additional Investment (minimum $100) | |||||||||||||
Total $ Invested | / / | This is my Initial Investment ($2,000 minimum) | ||||||||||||
(Minimum Investment $2,000) | State in which sale was made: | |||||||||||||
/ / | Check this box if you are purchasing Shares from a registered investment advisor in a fee only account. (Advisor listed below must agree to this election) | |||||||||||||
2. |
ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS |
|||||||||||||
/ / | Please check the box if you plan to make additional investments in Dividend Capital Trust. If additional investments are made, please include social security number or other taxpayer identification number on your check. All additional investments must be made in increments of $100. By checking this box, I agree to notify Dividend Capital Trust in writing if at any time I fail to meet the suitability standards or am unable to make the representations in Section 6. | |||||||||||||
3. |
TYPE OF OWNERSHIP |
|||||||||||||
/ / | Individual | / / | Keogh | / / | Transfer on Death | |||||||||
/ / | Joint Tenants With Right of Survivorship | / / | Qualified Pension Plan | |||||||||||
/ / | Community Property | / / | Qualified Profit Sharing Plan | |||||||||||
/ / | Tenants in Common | / / | Other Trust | For the Benefit of | ||||||||||
/ / | Company | / / | Custodian: Custodian for | under the Uniform Gift to | ||||||||||
/ / | IRA | Minors Act or the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act of the State of | ||||||||||||
4. |
REGISTRATION NAME AND ADDRESS |
|||||||||||||
Please print name(s) in which Shares are to be registered. Include trust name and designated custodian if applicable. |
||||||||||||||
Name (include Mr., Mrs., Dr. etc.): Social Security Number: - - |
||||||||||||||
Street Address: Taxpayer ID Number: - - |
||||||||||||||
City: State: Zip Code: |
||||||||||||||
Home Phone No.: Business Phone No.: Birth Date: |
||||||||||||||
Email Address: Occupation: |
||||||||||||||
5. |
INVESTOR NAME AND ADDRESS(COMPLETE ONLY IF DIFFERENT FROM REGISTRATION NAME AND ADDRESS) |
|||||||||||||
Name (include Mr., Mrs., Dr. etc.): Social Security Number: - - |
||||||||||||||
Street Address: Taxpayer ID Number: - - |
||||||||||||||
City: State: Zip Code: |
||||||||||||||
Home Phone No.: Business Phone No.: Birth Date: |
||||||||||||||
Email Address: Occupation: |
||||||||||||||
6. |
SUITABILITY |
|||||||||||||
Occupation Annual Income Net Worth |
||||||||||||||
Investment objectives |
||||||||||||||
Nature of other investments or securities holdings |
||||||||||||||
(REVERSE SIDE MUST BE COMPLETED) |
A-9
7. | SUBSCRIBER SIGNATURES | |||||||||||||
Please separately initial each of the representations below. Except in the case of fiduciary accounts, you may not grant any person a power of attorney to make such representations on your behalf. In order to induce
Dividend Capital Trust to accept this subscription, I hereby represent and warrant to you as follows: |
(a) | I have received the Prospectus. | (a) | Initials |
Initials |
||||||
(b) | I accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of the Articles of Incorporation. | (b) | Initials |
Initials |
||||||
(c) | I have (i) a net worth (exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobiles) of $150,000 or more; or (ii) a net worth (as described above) of at least $45,000 AND had during the last tax year or estimate that I will have during the current tax year a minimum of $45,000 annual gross income, or that I meet the higher suitability requirements imposed by my state of primary residence as set forth in the Prospectus under "SUITABILITY STANDARDS." | (c) | Initials |
Initials |
||||||
(d) | If I propose to assign or transfer any Shares to any Person who is a California resident, or if I am a California resident, I may not consummate a sale or transfer of my Shares, or any interest therein, or receive any consideration therefore, without the prior written consent of the Commissioner of the Department of Corporations of the State of California, except as permitted in the Commissioner's Rules, and I understand that my Shares, or any document evidencing my Shares, will bear a legend reflecting the substance of the foregoing understanding. | (d) | Initials |
Initials |
||||||
(e) | I am purchasing Shares for my own account and acknowledge that the investment is not liquid. | (e) | Initials |
Initials |
||||||
I declare that the information supplied above is true and correct and may be relied upon by Dividend Capital Trust in connection with my investment in Dividend Capital Trust. Under penalties of perjury, by signing this Signature Page, I hereby certify that (a) I have provided my correct Taxpayer Identification Number, and (b) I am not subject to back-up withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest and dividends, or the Internal Revenue Service has notified me that I am no longer subject to back-up withholding. |
Signature of Investor or Trustee |
Signature of Joint Owner, if applicable |
Date |
||||
(MUST BE SIGNED BY TRUSTEE(S) IF IRA, KEOGH OR QUALIFIED PLAN.) |
8. |
DISTRIBUTIONS |
|||||||
/ / |
I prefer to participate in the Distribution Reinvestment Plan |
/ / |
I prefer distributions in cash, send checks to address in section 4 |
|||||
/ / |
I prefer not to participate in the Distribution Reinvestment Plan and would like dividends to be deposited in the account listed below: |
|||||||
Institution Name |
||||||||
Name on Account Account Number |
||||||||
Street Address City State ZIP |
||||||||
9. |
BROKER-DEALER (THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE.) |
|||||||
The Broker-Dealer or authorized representative must sign below to complete the order. Broker-Dealer or authorized representative warrants that it is a duly licensed Broker-Dealer and may lawfully offer Shares in the state designated as the investor's address or the state in which the sale was made, if different. The Broker-Dealer or authorized representative warrants that he has reasonable grounds to believe this investment is suitable as defined in Section 3(b) of the Rules of Fair Practice of the NASD Manual and that he has informed subscriber of all aspects of liquidity and marketability of this investment as required by Section 4 of such Rules of Fair Practice. |
||||||||
Broker-Dealer Name: Telephone No.: |
||||||||
Broker-Dealer Street Address: |
||||||||
City: State: Zip Code: |
||||||||
Registered Rep. Name: Telephone No.: |
||||||||
Registered Rep. Address: Rep ID# |
||||||||
City: State: Zip Code: |
||||||||
Email Address: |
||||||||
Registered Representative Signature |
Broker-Dealer Signature, if required |
Please mail completed Subscription Agreement (with all signatures) and check(s) made payable to: DIVIDEND CAPITAL TRUST INC. 7103 S. Revere Parkway Englewood, CO 80112 |
Wiring Instructions: Wells Fargo Bank West, N.A. ABA 121000248 Dividend Capital Trust Inc. #609921887 Ref: Escrow Account Attn: Jennifer Miley (303) 863 5238 |
DCT contact information: 866-328-7348 303-228-2200 303-228-2201 info@dividendcapital.com |
Toll Free Phone Fax |
A-10
AMENDED AND RESTATED
DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT PLAN
As of January 1, 2004
THIS DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT Plan ("Plan") is adopted by the Dividend Capital Trust Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to its Articles of Incorporation. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation (the "Articles").
1. Distribution Reinvestment. As agent for the shareholders ("Shareholders") of the Company who (i) purchase shares of the Company's common stock (the "Shares") pursuant to the Company's initial public offering (the "Initial Offering"), or (ii) purchase Shares pursuant to any future offering of the Company ("Future Offering"), and who elect to participate in the Plan, the Company will apply all dividends and other distributions declared and paid in respect of the Shares held by each participating Shareholder (the "Dividends"), including Dividends paid with respect to any full or fractional Shares acquired under the Plan, to the purchase of the Shares for such participating Shareholders directly, if permitted under state securities laws and, if not, through the Dealer Manager or Soliciting Dealers registered in the participating Shareholder's state of residence.
Additionally, as agent for the holders of limited partnership interests (the "OP Interests") of Dividend Capital Operating Partnership LP (the "Partnership") who (i) acquire such interest in the Partnership via the Partnership's private placement of its limited partnership units (the "Private Placement"), or (ii) pursuant to any other transactions of the Partnership, and who elect to participate in the Plan (together with the participating Shareholders, the "Participants"), the Partnership will apply all distributions declared and paid in respect of the OP Interests held by each Participant (the "Distributions"), including Distributions paid with respect to any full or fractional OP Interests acquired, to the purchase of the Shares for such Participant directly, if permitted under state securities laws and, if not, through the Dealer Manager or Soliciting Dealers registered in the Participant's state of residence.
2. Effective Date. The Plan went effective on July 22, 2002. Any amendment to the Plan shall be effective as provided in Section 9.
3. Procedure for Participation. Any Shareholder or holder of OP Interests, who purchases Shares pursuant to the Initial Offering or any Future Offering, or OP Interests via the Private Placement or other Partnership transaction and who has received a prospectus, as contained in the Company's registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), may elect to become a Participant by completing and executing the Subscription Agreement, an enrollment form or any other appropriate authorization form as may be available from the Company, the Partnership, the Dealer Manager or Soliciting Dealer. Participation in the Plan will begin with the next Dividend or Distribution payable after receipt of a Participant's subscription, enrollment or authorization. Shares will be purchased under the Plan on the date that Dividends or Distributions are paid by the Company or the Partnership, as the case may be. The Company intends to pay Dividends and, on behalf of the Partnership, Distributions on a quarterly basis. Each Participant agrees that if, at any time prior to the listing of the Shares on a national stock exchange or inclusion of the Shares for quotation on Nasdaq, he or she fails to meet the suitability requirements for making an investment in the Company or cannot make the other representations or warranties set forth in the Subscription Agreement, he or she will promptly so notify the Company in writing.
4. Purchase of Shares. Participants will acquire Plan Shares from the Company at a discounted price equal to 95% of the current offering price until the earliest of (i) all of the Plan Shares registered
B-1
are issued, (ii) all offerings terminate and the Company elects to deregister with the Commission the unsold Plan Shares, or (iii) there is more than a de minimis amount of trading in our common stock, at which time any registered Plan Shares then available under the Plan will be sold at a discounted price equal to 95% of the fair market value of the shares, as determined by the Company's Board of Directors by reference to the applicable sales price in respect to the most recent trades occurring on or prior to the relevant distribution date. Participants in the Plan may also purchase fractional Shares so that 100% of the Dividends or Distributions will be used to acquire Shares. However, a Participant will not be able to acquire Plan Shares to the extent that any such purchase would cause such Participant to exceed the Ownership Limit as set forth in the Articles or otherwise would cause a violation of the share ownership restrictions set forth in the Articles. Notwithstanding the foregoing, shares issued pursuant to the Plan will be assessed a service fee equal to 1.0% of the current offering price of the Company's common stock payable to the Broker-Dealer. The service fee will be paid to the Broker-Dealer for the cost of administering the Plan.
Shares to be distributed by the Company in connection with the Plan may (but are not required to) be supplied from: (a) the Plan Shares which will be registered with the Commission in connection with the Company's Initial Offering, (b) Shares to be registered with the Commission in a Future Offering for use in the Plan (a "Future Registration"), or (c) Shares of the Company's common stock purchased by the Company for the Plan in a secondary market (if available) or on a stock exchange or Nasdaq (if listed) (collectively, the "Secondary Market").
Shares purchased in any Secondary Market will be purchased at the then-prevailing market price, which price will be utilized for purposes of issuing Shares in the Plan. Shares acquired by the Company in any Secondary Market or registered in a Future Registration for use in the Plan may be at prices lower or higher than the Share price which will be paid for the Plan Shares pursuant to the Initial Offering.
If the Company acquires Shares in any Secondary Market for use in the Plan, the Company shall use its reasonable efforts to acquire Shares at the lowest price then reasonably available. However, the Company does not in any respect guarantee or warrant that the Shares so acquired and purchased by the Participant in the Plan will be at the lowest possible price. Further, irrespective of the Company's ability to acquire Shares in any Secondary Market or to make a Future Offering for Shares to be used in the Plan, the Company is in no way obligated to do either, in its sole discretion.
It is understood that reinvestment of Dividends and Distributions does not relieve a Participant of any income tax liability which may be payable on the Dividends and Distributions.
5. Share Certificates. The ownership of the Shares purchased through the Plan will be in book-entry form unless and until the Company issues certificates for its outstanding common stock.
6. Reports. Within 90 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year, the Company shall provide each Shareholder with an individualized report on his or her investment, including the purchase date(s), purchase price and number of Shares owned, as well as the dates of Dividend and/or Distribution payments and amounts of Dividends and/or Distributions paid during the prior fiscal year. In addition, the Company shall provide to each Participant an individualized quarterly report at the time of each Dividend and/or Distribution payment showing the number of Shares owned prior to the current Dividend and/or Distribution, the amount of the current Dividend and/or Distribution and the number of Shares owned after the current Dividend and/or Distribution.
7. Service Fee. In connection with Shares sold pursuant to the Plan, the Company will pay to the Broker-Dealer a service fee for the cost of administering the Plan equal to 1% of the then fair market value of the Company's common stock as determined in accordance with Section 4; and, in the event that proceeds from the sale of Plan Shares are used to acquire properties, acquisition and advisory fees will be paid to the Advisor.
B-2
8. Termination by Participant. A Participant may terminate participation in the Plan at any time, without penalty by delivering to the Company a written notice. Prior to listing of the Shares on a national stock exchange or Nasdaq, any transfer of Shares by a Participant to a non-Participant will terminate participation in the Plan with respect to the transferred Shares. Any transfer of OP Interests by a Participant to a non-Participant at any time will terminate participation in the Plan with respect to the transferred OP Interests. Upon termination of Plan participation for any reason, Dividends and/or Distributions paid subsequent to termination will be distributed to the Shareholder or holder OP Interests in cash.
9. Amendment or Termination of Plan by the Company. The Board of Directors of the Company may by majority vote (including a majority of the Independent Directors) amend or terminate the Plan for any reason upon 10 days' written notice to the Participants.
10. Liability of the Company. The Company shall not be liable for any act done in good faith, or for any good faith omission to act, including, without limitation, any claims or liability (a) arising out of failure to terminate a Participant's account upon such Participant's death prior to receipt of notice in writing of such death; or (b) with respect to the time and the prices at which Shares are purchased or sold for a Participant's account. To the extent that indemnification may apply to liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the securities laws of a particular state, the Company has been advised that, in the opinion of the Commission and certain state securities commissioners, such indemnification is contrary to public policy and, therefore, unenforceable.
B-3
No dealer, salesperson or other individual has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations that are not contained in this prospectus. If any such information or statements are given or made, you should not rely upon such information or representation. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell any securities other than those to which this prospectus relates, or an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, to any person in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be unlawful. This prospectus speaks as of the date set forth below. You should not assume that the delivery of this prospectus or that any sale made pursuant to this prospectus implies that the information contained in this prospectus will remain fully accurate and correct as of any time subsequent to the date of this prospectus.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
$1,000,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
Dividend Capital Securities LLC
June 27, 2005