UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C.  20549

___________________

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

[X]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September  30, 2015

 

[  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________to ________

 

Commission File Number 0-29030

 

SUSSEX BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)   

 

 

 

 

 

(844) 256-7328

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  

Yes ☒     No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). 

Yes ☒     No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yes ☐    No ☒ 

 

As of November  6, 2015 there were 4,645,387 shares of common stock, no par value, outstanding.

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

SUSSEX BANCORP

FORM 10-Q

 

INDEX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

We may, from time to time, make written or oral “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including statements contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), our reports to shareholders and in other communications by us. This Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” which may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “estimated” and “potential.”  Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to our financial condition, results of operation and business that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates.  These factors include, but are not limited to:

 

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements.  You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.  We do not undertake any obligation to republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

 

---

 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 – Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

NOTE 1  –  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Sussex Bancorp (“we,” “us,” “our” or the “company”) and our wholly owned subsidiary Sussex Bank (the “Bank”).  The Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries are SCB Investment Company, Inc., SCBNY Company, Inc., ClassicLake Enterprises, LLC, Wheatsworth Properties Corp., PPD Holding Company, LLC, and Tri-State Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Tri-State”), a full service insurance agency located in Sussex County, New Jersey with a satellite office located in Bergen County, New Jersey.  Tri-State’s operations are considered a separate segment for financial disclosure purposes.  All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.  The Bank operates eleven banking offices, eight located in Sussex County, New Jersey,  one located in Warren County, New Jersey,  one in Queens County, New York and one in Orange County, New York.

 

We are subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”).  The Bank’s deposits are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the FDIC up to applicable limits.  The operations of the company and the Bank are subject to the supervision and regulation of the FRB, the FDIC and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (the “Department”) and the operations of Tri-State are subject to supervision and regulation by the Department.

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for full year financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal, recurring nature.  Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September  30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015.  These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto that are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.  

 

New Accounting Standards

In January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-04, Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors.  This ASU clarifies that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, the amendments require interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction.  For public entities, the guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The ASU’s core principle is built on the contract between a vendor and a customer for the provision of goods and services. It attempts to depict the exchange of rights and obligations between the parties in the pattern of revenue recognition based on the consideration to which the vendor is entitled. To accomplish this objective, the standard requires five basic steps: (1) identify the contract with the customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. For public entities, the guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017.   We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-11, Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures, to change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions and certain linked repurchase financings.  This will result in accounting for both types of arrangements as secured borrowings on the balance sheet, rather than sales.  Additionally, the ASU introduces new disclosures to (1) increase transparency about the types of collateral pledged in secured borrowing transactions and (2) enable users to better understand transactions in which the transferor retains substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial asset throughout the term of the transaction. For public entities, the disclosure for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and repurchase-to-maturity transactions accounted for as secured borrowings is required to be presented for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and for interim periods beginning after March 15, 2015. All other accounting and disclosure amendments in the ASU are effective for public business entities for the first interim or

---

 

annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-12, Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), to clarify that a performance target in a share-based compensation award that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period should be treated as a performance condition that affects the vesting of the award.  As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. For all entities, the amendments are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-05, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement, to clarify whether a hosting arrangement (e.g., cloud computing, software as a service, infrastructure as a service, etc.) contains a software license, and thus, whether it is to be accounted for by the customer similarly to other internal-use software.  Specifically, the amendments revise the scope of Subtopic 350-40 to include internal-use software accessed through a hosting arrangement only if both of the following criteria are met: (1) the customer has the contractual right to take possession of the software at any time during the hosting period without significant penalty.  There is no significant penalty if the customer has the ability to take delivery of the software without incurring significant cost and the ability to use the software separately without significant loss of utility or value and (2) it is feasible for the customer to either run the software on its own hardware or contract with another party unrelated to the vendor to host the software.  If both of the above criteria are present in a hosting arrangement, then the arrangement contains a software license and the customer should account for that element in accordance with Subtopic 350-40 (i.e., generally capitalize and subsequently amortize the cost of the license).  If both of the above criteria are not present, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract (i.e., expense fees as incurred).  The amendments are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The amendments are effective for all other entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early adoption is permitted.  An entity can elect to adopt the amendments either (1) prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date or (2) retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which defers the effective date of the new revenue recognition standard by one year.  As such, it now takes effect for public entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.  All other entities have an additional year.  However, early adoption is permitted for any entity that chooses to adopt the new standard as of the original effective date.   Public business entities will adopt the standard for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that year.  Early adoption is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that year.  All other entities will adopt the standard for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019.  Early adoption is permitted as of either: (a) An annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that year, or (b) An annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning one year after the annual period in which an entity first applies the new standard.  We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

 

---

 

NOTE 2 – SECURITIES

 

Available for Sale

 

The amortized cost and approximate fair value of securities available for sale as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are summarized as follows:

 

 

Securities with a carrying value of approximately $33.0 million and $32.8 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by applicable laws and regulations.

 

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale at September  30, 2015 are shown below by contractual maturity.  Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

 

Gross realized gains on sales of securities available for sale were $64 thousand and $242 thousand and gross realized losses were $53 thousand and $78 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

Gross realized gains on sales of securities were $368 thousand and $360 thousand and gross losses were $101 thousand and $102 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

 

 

 

---

 

Temporarily Impaired Securities

The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other than temporarily impaired, aggregated by category and length of time that individual available for sale securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September  30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

 

For each security whose fair value is less than their amortized cost basis, a review is conducted to determine if an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. As of September 30, 2015, we reviewed our available for sale securities portfolio for indications of impairment. This review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than the cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer and the intent and likelihood of selling the security.  The intent and likelihood of sale of debt and equity securities are evaluated based upon our investment strategy for the particular type of security and our cash flow needs, liquidity position, capital adequacy and interest rate risk position. 

 

U.S. Government Agencies 

At September  30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the decline in fair value and the unrealized losses for our U.S. government agencies securities were primarily due to changes in spreads and market conditions and not credit quality.  At September  30, 2015, there were five securities with a fair value of $7.3 million that had an unrealized loss that amounted to $48 thousand.  As of September  30, 2015, we did not intend to sell and it was not more-likely-than-not that we would be required to sell any of these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.  Therefore, none of the U.S. government agency securities at September 30, 2015 were deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired (“OTTI”).

 

At December 31, 2014, there were two securities with a fair value of $2.9 million that had an unrealized loss that amounted to $32 thousand.

 

State and Political Subdivisions

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the decline in fair value and the unrealized losses for our state and political subdivisions securities were caused by changes in interest rates and spreads and were not the result of credit quality.  At September 30, 2015, there were 36 securities with a fair value of $23.6 million that had an unrealized loss that amounted to $364 thousand.  These securities typically have maturity dates greater than 10 years and the fair values are more sensitive to changes in market interest rates.  As of September 30, 2015,  we did not intend to sell and it was not more-likely-than-not that we would be required to sell any of these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.  Therefore, none of our state and political subdivision securities at September 30, 2015 were deemed to be OTTI.  

 

At December 31, 2014, there were 22 securities with a fair value of $13.3 million that had an unrealized loss that amounted to $206 thousand. 

 

---

 

Mortgage-Backed Securities

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the decline in fair value and the unrealized losses for our mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises were primarily due to changes in spreads and market conditions and not credit quality.  At September 30, 2015, there were 7 securities with a fair value of $11.4 million that had an unrealized loss that amounted to $90 thousand.  As of September 30, 2015,  we did not intend to sell and it was not more-likely-than-not that we would be required to sell any of these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.  Therefore, none of our mortgage-backed securities at September 30, 2015 were deemed to be OTTI.  

 

At December 31, 2014, there were 13 securities with a fair value of $19.1 million that had an unrealized loss that amounted to $158 thousand. 

 

Equity Securities

Our marketable equity securities portfolio consists primarily of common stock of an entity in the insurance services industry.  At September 30, 2015, we did not have any securities in an unrealized loss position.    

 

At December 31, 2014,  we did not have any securities in an unrealized loss position.

 

We continue to closely monitor the performance of the securities we own as well as the impact from any further deterioration in the economy or in the banking industry that may adversely affect these securities. We will continue to evaluate them for other-than-temporary impairment, which could result in a future non-cash charge to earnings.

 

Held to Maturity Securities

 

The amortized cost and approximate fair value of securities held to maturity as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are summarized as follows:

 

 

The amortized cost and carrying value of securities held to maturity at September 30, 2015 are shown below by contractual maturity.  Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

---

 

Temporarily Impaired Securities

The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value of held to maturity securities with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other than temporarily impaired, aggregated by category and length of time that individual held to maturity securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

 

For each security whose fair value is less than their amortized cost basis, a review is conducted to determine if an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. As of September 30, 2015, we reviewed our held to maturity securities portfolio for indications of impairment. This review includes analyzing the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been lower than the cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer and the intent and likelihood of selling the security.  The intent and likelihood of sale of debt and equity securities are evaluated based upon our investment strategy for the particular type of security and our cash flow needs, liquidity position, capital adequacy and interest rate risk position.

 

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the decline in fair value and the unrealized losses for our state and political subdivisions securities were caused by changes in interest rates and spreads and were not the result of credit quality.  At September 30, 2015,  there were two securities with a fair value of $804 thousand that had an unrealized loss that amounted to $2 thousand.  These securities typically have maturity dates greater than 10 years and the fair values are more sensitive to changes in market interest rates.  As of September 30, 2015,  we did not intend to sell and it was not more-likely-than-not that we would be required to sell any of these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis.  Therefore, none of our state and political subdivision securities at September 30, 2015 were deemed to be OTTI.

 

At December 31, 2014, there were two securities with a fair value of $811 thousand that had an unrealized loss that amounted to $5 thousand. 

 

---

 

NOTE 3 – LOANS

 

The composition of net loans receivable at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is as follows:

 

Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying balance sheets.  The total amount of loans serviced for the benefit of others was approximately $460 thousand and $475 thousand at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. Mortgage servicing rights were immaterial at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

NOTE 4 – ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND CREDIT QUALITY OF FINANCING RECEIVABLES

 

The following table presents changes in the allowance for loan losses disaggregated by the class of loans receivable for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:  

 

 

 

---

 

The following table presents the balance of the allowance of loan losses and loans receivable by class at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 disaggregated on the basis of our impairment methodology.

 

 

 

An age analysis of loans receivable, which were past due as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, is as follows:

 

 

 

---

 

Loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were:

 

 

 

 

In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we estimate losses based on the identification of specific problem loans through our credit review process and also estimate losses inherent in other loans on an aggregate basis by loan type.  The credit review process includes the independent evaluation of the loan officer, and assigned risk ratings by the Chief Credit Officer and a third party loan review company.  Such risk ratings are assigned loss component factors that reflect our loss estimate for each group of loans.  It is management’s and the Board of Directors’ responsibility to oversee the lending process to ensure that all credit risks are properly identified, monitored, and controlled, and that loan pricing, terms and other safeguards against non-performance and default are commensurate with the level of risk undertaken and is rated as such based on a risk-rating system.  Factors considered in assigning risk ratings and loss component factors include: borrower specific information related to expected future cash flows and operating results, collateral values, financial condition and payment status; levels of and trends in portfolio charge-offs and recoveries; levels in portfolio delinquencies; effects of changes in loan concentrations and observed trends in the economy and other qualitative measurements.

 

Our risk-rating system is consistent with the classification system used by regulatory agencies and with industry practices. Loan classifications of Substandard, Doubtful or Loss are consistent with the regulatory definitions of classified assets.  The classification system is as follows:    

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

The following tables illustrate our corporate credit risk profile by creditworthiness category as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014: 

 

 

 

 

The following table reflects information about our impaired loans by class as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

The following table presents the average recorded investment and income recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

We recognize interest income on performing impaired loans as payments are received.  On non-performing impaired loans we do not recognize interest income as all payments are recorded as a reduction of principal on such loans.    

 

Impaired loans include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.  These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, postponement or forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection.  The concessions rarely result in the forgiveness of principal or accrued interest.  In addition, we attempt to obtain additional collateral or guarantor support when modifying such loans.  Non-accruing restructured loans may be returned to accrual status when there has been a sustained period of repayment performance (generally six consecutive months of payments) and both principal and interest are deemed collectible.

 

---

 

The following table presents the recorded investment in troubled debt restructured loans, based on payment performance status:

 

Troubled debt restructured loans are considered impaired and are included in the previous impaired loans disclosures in this footnote.  As of September 30, 2015, we have not committed to lend additional amounts to customers with outstanding loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings.

 

There were no troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. 

 

 

There were no troubled debt restructurings for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the date of the restructuring for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

 

We may obtain physical possession of residential real estate collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan via foreclosure on an in-substance repossession. As of September 30, 2015, we did not hold any foreclosed residential real estate properties as a result of obtaining physical possession. In addition, as of September 30, 2015, we had consumer loans with a carrying value of $1.3 million collateralized by residential real estate property for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.

 

 

NOTE 5 – EARNINGS PER SHARE 

 

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares (unvested restricted stock grants and stock options) had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance of potential common shares that may be issued by us. Potential common shares related to stock options are determined using the treasury stock method.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There were 52,023 and no shares of unvested restricted stock awards and options outstanding during the three months ended September  30,  2015 and 2014, respectively, which were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive.  There were 66,946 and 9,381 shares of unvested restricted stock awards and options outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive.

 

NOTE 6 – OTHER COMPREHENSIVE  (LOSS) INCOME 

 

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income.  Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.

 

The components of other comprehensive income, both before tax and net of tax, are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE 7 – SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

Our insurance agency operations are managed separately from the traditional banking and related financial services that we also offer.  The insurance agency operation provides commercial, individual, and group benefit plans and personal coverage.

 

 

 

 

 

(1) Insurance Services calculated at statutory tax rate of 40%

 

NOTE 8 –  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION 

 

We currently have stock-based compensation plans in place for our directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors.  Under the terms of these plans we may grant restricted shares and stock options for the purchase of our common stock.  The stock-based compensation is granted under terms determined by our Compensation Committee.  Our standard stock option grants have a maximum term of 10 years, generally vest over periods ranging between one and four years, and are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.  Restricted stock is valued at the market value of the common stock on the date of grant and generally vests over periods of two to seven years.  All dividends paid on restricted stock, whether vested or unvested, are paid to the shareholder.

 

---

 

Information regarding our stock option plans for the nine months ended September  30, 2015 is as follows:

 

 

The following table summarizes information about stock option assumptions:

 

 

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2015 we expensed $10 thousand in stock-based compensation under stock option awards.  There was no stock-based compensation expensed under stock option awards during the three months ended September 30, 2014.

 

During the nine months ended September  30, 2015 we expensed $28 thousand in stock-based compensation under stock option awards.  There was no stock-based compensation expensed under stock option awards during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

 

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September  30,  2015 was $3.56 per share. Expected future expense relating to the unvested options outstanding as of September 30, 2015 is $160 thousand over a weighted average period of 4.2 years. Upon exercise of vested options, management expects to draw on treasury stock as the source of the shares.

 

The summary of changes in unvested restricted stock awards for the nine months ended September  30, 2015, is as follows:

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we expensed $84 thousand and $74 thousand, respectively, in stock-based compensation under restricted stock awards. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we expensed $251 thousand and $230 thousand, respectively, in stock-based compensation under restricted stock awards.

 

At September  30, 2015, unrecognized compensation expense for unvested restricted stock was $506 thousand, which is expected to be recognized over an average period of 1.6 years.    

 

 

 

---

 

NOTE 9 – GUARANTEES

 

We do not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or disclosure, other than standby letters of credit.  Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  Generally, all letters of credit, when issued, have expiration dates within one year.  The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.  Generally, we hold collateral and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments.  As of September  30, 2015, we  had $839 thousand of outstanding letters of credit.  Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees.  The amount of the liability as of September  30, 2015, for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not material.

 

NOTE 10 –  FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of our financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique.  Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could have realized in a sale transaction on the dates indicated.  The fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective period ends, and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates.  As such, the fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each period end.

 

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we use a hierarchical disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value.  The three broad levels defined by the hierarchy are as follows:

 

 

 

 

---

 

The following table summarizes the fair value of our financial assets measured on a recurring basis by the above pricing observability levels as of September  30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

 

 

 

Our available for sale and held to maturity securities portfolios contain investments, which were all rated within our investment policy guidelines at time of purchase, and upon review of the entire portfolio all securities are marketable and have observable pricing inputs.

 

For financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September  30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows:

 

 

 

---

 

The following table presents additional qualitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which Level III inputs were used to determine fair value:

 

 

 

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of our assets and liabilities.  Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between our disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.  The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of our financial instruments at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:  

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents (Carried at Cost): The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets’ fair value.

 

Deposits (Carried at Cost): Fair value for fixed-rate time certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.  We generally purchase amounts below the insured limit, limiting the amount of credit risk on these time deposits.  

 

Securities: The fair value of securities, available for sale (carried at fair value) and securities held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level I), or matrix pricing (Level II), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.  For certain securities which are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence (Level III).  In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. 

 

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock (Carried at Cost):  The carrying amount of restricted investment in bank stock approximates fair value and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

 

Loans Receivable (Carried at Cost): The fair values of non-impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using the market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans.  Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal.  Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

---

 

 

Impaired Loans (Carried at Lower of Cost or Fair Value): Fair value of impaired loans is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds.  These assets are included in Level III fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.  The fair value of impaired loans  totaled  $1.5 million and $1.1 million at September  30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.  These balances consist of loans that were written down or required additional reserves during the periods ended September  30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.    

 

Deposit Liabilities (Carried at Cost): The fair values disclosed for demand, savings and money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts).  Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. 

 

Borrowings (Carried at Cost): Fair values of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.  These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party. 

 

Junior Subordinated Debentures (Carried at Cost): Fair values of junior subordinated debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on market rates currently offered on such debt with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. 

 

Accrued Interest Receivable and Accrued Interest Payable (Carried at Cost): The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable and payable approximate its fair value.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Instruments (Disclosed at Cost): Fair values for our off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. 

 

---

 

The fair values of our financial instruments at September  30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, were as follows: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

 

MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

 

We are a community-oriented financial institution serving northern New Jersey, northeastern Pennsylvania, New York City, New York and Orange County, New York.  While offering traditional community bank loan and deposit products and services, we obtain non-interest income through our insurance brokerage operations and the sale of non-deposit products. 

 

We continue to focus on strengthening our core operating performance by improving our net interest income and margin by closely monitoring our yield on earning assets and adjusting the rates offered on deposit products.  We have been focused on building for the future and strengthening our core operating results within our risk management framework. 

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and practices within the banking industry.  Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.  These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Critical accounting estimates are necessary in the application of certain accounting policies and procedures, and are particularly susceptible to significant change. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions.  There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  For additional information on our critical accounting policies, please refer to Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements included in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

---

 

COMPARISION OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER  30, 2015 AND 2014

 

Overview – For the quarter ended September  30,  2015, we reported net income of $951 thousand, or $0.21 per basic and diluted share as compared to net income of $592 thousand, or $0.13 per basic and diluted share, for the same period last year.  This increase equates to a 61.5% increase in net income per diluted common share for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year. The improvement for the third quarter of 2015 was driven by loan and deposit growth, an increase in pre-tax income generated from our insurance subsidiary and a decline in credit quality costs (provision for loan losses, loan collection costs and expenses and write-downs related to foreclosed real estate). 

Comparative Average Balances and Average Interest Rates – The following table presents, on a fully tax equivalent basis, a summary of our interest-earning assets and their average yields, and interest-bearing liabilities and their average costs for the three month periods ended September  30, 2015 and 2014:

 

 

 

 

Net Interest Income – Net interest income is the difference between interest and fees on loans and other interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.  Net interest income is directly affected by changes in volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that support those assets, as well as changing interest rates when differences exist in repricing dates of assets and liabilities.

---

 

 

Net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis increased $508 thousand, or 10.9%, to $5.2 million for the third quarter of 2015, as compared to $4.7 million for the same period in 2014.  The increase in net interest income was largely due to a $64.7 million, or 12.1%, increase in average interest earning assets, principally loans receivable, which increased $51.2 million, or 11.7%.  The improvement in net interest income was partly offset by a decline in the net interest margin of 4 basis points to 3.43% for the third quarter of 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. The decline in the net interest margin was mostly attributed to a 10 basis point decrease in the average rate on loans. 

Interest Income – Our total interest income, on a fully tax equivalent basis, increased $560 thousand, or 10.2%, to $6.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  The increase was due to higher average earning assets, which increased $64.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. 

 

Our total interest income earned on loans receivable increased $450 thousand, or 9.1%, to $5.4 million for the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.  The increase was driven by an increase in average balance of loans receivable of $51.2 million, or 11.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  The increase in interest income earned on loans receivable was partially offset by a 10 basis point decline in the average yield to 4.39% for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. 

 

Our total interest income earned on securities, on a fully tax equivalent basis, increased $113 thousand, to $668 thousand for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 from $555 thousand for the same period in 2014.  This  increase was largely due to an increase in the average balance of securities of $17.6 million, or 20.4%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year. 

 

Other interest-earning assets include federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits in other banks. Our interest earned on total other interest-earning assets decreased $3 thousand for the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, due to a  9 basis point decline in the average yield to 0.06%, as compared to 0.15% in the same period in 2014.  The average balances in other interest-earning assets decreased $4.0 million to $6.2 million in the third quarter of 2015 from $10.2 million during the third quarter a year earlier. 

 

Interest Expense – Our interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2015 increased $52 thousand, or 6.2%, to $893 thousand from $841 thousand for the same period in 2014.  The increase was principally due to higher average balances in interest-bearing liabilities, which increased $40.5 million, or 9.2%, to $481.9 million for the third quarter of 2015 from $441.4 million for the same period in 2014.

 

Our interest expense on deposits increased $24 thousand, or 5.7%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  The increase was largely attributed to the increase in the average balance of total interest bearing deposits, which increased $24.3 million during the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.    

 

Our interest expense on borrowed funds increased $27 thousand, or 7.4%, for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  The increase was largely attributed to the average balance of borrowed funds increasing  $16.2 million during the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.    

 

Provision for Loan Losses – Provision for loan losses decreased $377 thousand, or 99.7%, to $1 thousand for the third quarter of 2015, as compared to $378 thousand for the same period in 2014.  The decrease in the provision for loan losses for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 was largely attributed to the resolution of problem loans.  The provision for loan losses reflects management’s judgment concerning the risks inherent in our existing loan portfolio and the size of the allowance necessary to absorb the risks, as well as the activity in the allowance during the periods.  Management reviews the adequacy of its allowance on an ongoing basis and will provide additional provisions, as management may deem necessary. 

 

Non-Interest Income – Our non-interest income increased $154 thousand, or 10.3%, to $1.7 million for the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  For the third quarter of 2015, insurance commissions and fees and other income increased $214 thousand and $73 thousand, respectively, as compared to the same period in 2014.  The increases were partia1ly offset by a decline in gain on securities transactions and service fees on deposit accounts of $153 thousand and $25 thousand, respectively, for the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.

Non-Interest Expense – Our non-interest expenses increased $504 thousand, or 10.4%, to $5.4 million for the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  The increase for the third quarter of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, was largely due to increases in salaries and employee benefits of $288 thousand, expenses and write-downs related to foreclosed real estate of $265 thousand, furniture and equipment expenses of $121 thousand and other expenses of $121 thousand, which were partially offset by decreases in loan collection costs of $81 thousand, FDIC fees of $63 thousand and occupancy, net of $49 thousand. 

---

 

The increases for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, in salaries and employee benefits expense were due in part to an increase in personnel to support our growth initiative in new markets, including the opening of our Astoria branch in the first quarter of 2015, additional staffing for business development and a temporary increase in staffing costs related to the development of a digital banking division.  The increases for the third quarter 2015 as compared to 2014 in furniture and equipment expenses were mostly related to costs associated with our new core application system, which was implemented in the third quarter of 2014.    The increases for the third quarter 2015, as compared to 2014, in foreclosed real estate expenses are mostly due to additional costs incurred as part of our continued efforts to resolve our problem assets.  The increase for the third quarter 2015 as compared to 2014 in other expenses is mostly due to payments made as part of settlements of disputes with third parties.  The decrease in FDIC fees is a result of the improvement in our financial and credit quality performance.  The decrease of loan collection costs during the third quarter 2015 as compared to 2014 is a result of our improved overall credit quality and reduction of problem loans.  

Income Taxes –  Our income tax expense, which includes both federal and state tax expenses, was $390 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $214 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2014.  Our effective tax rate was 29.1% and 26.6% for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  The increased effective tax rate was the result of a smaller percentage of our pre-tax income resulting from tax exempt sources.

 

---

 

COMPARISION OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 AND 2014

 

Overview -  For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we reported net income of $2.8 million, or $0.61 per basic and diluted share, as compared to net income of $1.9 million, or $0.41 per basic and diluted share, for the same period last year.  The increase in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was largely due to increases in net interest income of $1.5 million, non-interest income of $507 thousand, and a decline in the provision for loan losses of $725 thousand, which were partially offset by an increase in non-interest expenses of $1.3 million and income tax expense of $519 thousand. Tri-State Insurance Agency, Inc. pre-tax income increased $175 thousand, or 41.5% to $601 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. 

 

Comparative Average Balances and Average Interest Rates - The following table presents, on a fully tax equivalent basis, a summary of our interest-earning assets and their average yields, and interest-bearing liabilities and their average costs for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

 

Net Interest Income – Net interest income, on a fully tax equivalent basis, increased $1.4 million, or 10.6%, to $15.1 million for the first nine months of 2015 as compared to $13.7 million for the same period in 2014.  The increase in net interest income was largely due to a $60.0 million, or 11.5%, increase in average interest earning assets, principally loans receivable, which increased $58.1 million, or 13.8%. The improvement in net interest income was partly offset by a decline in the net interest margin of 3 basis points to 3.47% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as

---

 

compared to the same period in 2014. The decline in the net interest margin was mostly attributed to a 14 basis point decrease in the average rate on loans.

 

Interest Income – Our total interest income, on a fully tax equivalent basis, increased $1.6 million, or 9.9%, to $17.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  The increase was due to higher average earning assets, which increased $60.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. 

 

Our total interest income earned on loans receivable increased $1.5 million, or 10.3%, to $15.8 million for the first nine months of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.  The increase was driven by an increase in average balance of loans receivable of $58.1 million, or 13.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  The increase in interest income earned on loans receivable was partially offset by a 14 basis point decline in the average yield to 4.43% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. 

 

Our total interest income earned on securities, on a fully tax equivalent basis, increased $127 thousand to $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from $1.8 million for the same period in 2014.  This increase was largely due to a 12 basis point increase in the average yield to 2.60% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year. 

 

Other interest-earning assets include federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits in other banks. Our interest earned on total other interest-earning assets decreased $3 thousand, or 27.3%, for the first nine months of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.  The decrease was due to both a decrease in the average balances in other interest-earning assets of  $301 thousand to $7.4 million in the first nine months of 2015 from $7.7 million during the first nine months a year earlier and a  5 basis point decline in the average yield to 0.14% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.    

 

Interest Expense – Our interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased $154 thousand, or 6.3%, to $2.6 million from $2.5 million for the same period in 2014.  The increase was principally due to higher average balances in interest-bearing liabilities, which increased $37.5 million, or 8.6%, to $475.9 million for the first nine months of 2015 from $438.4 million for the same period in 2014.

 

Our interest expense on deposits increased $73 thousand, or 5.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  The increase was largely attributed to the increase in the average balance of total interest bearing deposits, which increased $23.6  million during the first nine months of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.    

 

Our interest expense on borrowed funds increased $78 thousand, or 7.3%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period last year.  The increase was largely attributed to the average balance of borrowed funds increasing  $13.9 million during the first nine months of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014. 

 

Provision for Loan Losses – Provision for loan losses decreased $725 thousand, or 58.9%, to $506 thousand for the first nine months of 2015, as compared to $1.2 million for the same period in 2014.    The decrease in the provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was largely attributed to the resolution of problem loans.  The provision for loan losses reflects management’s judgment concerning the risks inherent in our existing loan portfolio and the size of the allowance necessary to absorb the risks, as well as the activity in the allowance during the periods.  Management reviews the adequacy of its allowance on an ongoing basis and will provide additional provisions, as management may deem necessary. 

 

Non-Interest Income – We reported an increase in non-interest income of $507 thousand, or 11.1%, to $5.1 million for the first nine months of 2015 as compared to the same period last year.  The increase in non-interest income was largely due to increases in insurance commissions and fees and other income of $436 thousand and $127 thousand, respectively, which were partially offset by a decrease in service fees on deposit accounts of $128 thousand for the first nine months of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.

Non-Interest Expense – Our non-interest expenses increased $1.3 million, or 9.2%, to $15.4 million for the first nine months of 2015 as compared to the same period last year.  The increase for the first nine months of 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, was largely due to increases in salaries and employee benefits of $998 thousand, furniture and equipment expenses of $269 thousand, other expenses of $230 thousand and expenses and write-downs related to foreclosed real estate of $203 thousand, which were partially offset by decreases in FDIC fees of $166 thousand, loan collection costs of $124 thousand and data processing of $110 thousand.

The increases for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, in salaries and employee benefits expense were due in part to an increase in personnel to support our growth initiative in new markets, including the opening of our Astoria branch in the first quarter of 2015, additional staffing for business development

---

 

and a temporary increase in staffing costs related to the development of a digital banking division.  The increases for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, in furniture and equipment expenses were mostly related to costs associated with our new core application system, which was implemented in the third quarter of 2014.    The increases for the nine month period for 2015, as compared to 2014, in foreclosed real estate expenses are mostly due to additional costs incurred as part of our continued efforts to resolve our problem assets.  The increase for the nine month period for 2015, as compared to 2014, in other expenses is mostly due to payments made as part of settlements of disputes with third parties.  The decrease of loan collections costs was mostly due to the improvement in credit quality.  The decrease in FDIC fees is a result of the improvement in our financial and credit quality performance.  The decrease of loan collection costs during the nine month period for 2015 as compared to 2014 is a result of our improved overall credit quality and reduction of problem loans.

Income Taxes –  Our income tax expense, which includes both federal and state tax expenses, was $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $671 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  Our effective tax rate was 29.9% and 26.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increased effective tax rate was the result of a smaller percentage of our pre-tax income resulting from tax exempt sources.

 

COMPARISION OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 TO DECEMBER 31, 2014

 

Total Assets – At September 30, 2015, our total assets were $644.0 million, an increase of $48.1 million, or 8.1%, as compared to total assets of $595.9 million at December 31, 2014.  The increase in total assets was largely driven by growth in loan receivable of $29.2 million, or 6.3% and the securities portfolio of $16.6 million, or 19.7%. 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Our cash and cash equivalents increased by $2.3 million to $8.2 million at September 30, 2015, or 1.3% of total assets, from $5.9 million, or 1.0%,  of total assets, at December 31, 2014.    

 

Securities Portfolio – At September 30, 2015, the securities portfolio, which includes available for sale and held to maturity securities, was $100.6 million, compared to $84.0 million at December 31, 2014. Available for sale securities were $94.7 million at September 30, 2015, compared to $78.0 million at December 31, 2014. The available for sale securities are held primarily for liquidity, interest rate risk management and profitability. Accordingly, our investment policy is to invest in securities with low credit risk, such as U.S. government agency obligations, state and political obligations and mortgage-backed securities. Held to maturity securities were $5.9 million at September 30, 2015 and $6.0 million at December 31, 2014.

 

Net unrealized gains in the available for sale securities portfolio were $188 thousand at September 30, 2015. Net unrealized gains in the available for sale securities portfolio were $281 thousand at December 31, 2014. 

 

We conduct a regular assessment of our investment securities to determine whether any securities are OTTI.  Further detail of the composition of the securities portfolio and discussion of the results of the most recent OTTI assessment are in Note 2 –  Securities to our unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

The unrealized losses in our securities portfolio are mostly driven by changes in spreads and market interest rates.  All of our debt and equity securities in an unrealized loss position have been evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment as of September  30, 2015 and we do not consider any security OTTI.  We evaluated the prospects of the issuers in relation to the severity and the duration of the unrealized losses.  In addition, we do not intend to sell, and it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell, any of our securities before recovery of their cost basis. 

 

Other investments totaled $4.0 million at September 30, 2015, as compared to $3.9 million at December 31, 2014,  which consisted primarily of FHLB stock. We also held $100 thousand in time deposits with other financial institutions at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. 

 

Loans – The loan portfolio comprises our largest class of earning assets.    Total loans receivable, net of unearned income, increased $29.2 million, or 6.2%, to $501.2 million at September 30, 2015, as compared to $472.0 million at December 31, 2014.  During the first nine months of 2015, the Company had $102.7 million in commercial loan production, which was largely offset by $27.4 million in commercial loan prepayments, an increase in commercial line of credit pay downs and the sale of $18.3 million in commercial loan participations to mitigate concentration risk. During the third quarter of 2015, total loans receivable, net of unearned income, increased $22.1 million, or 18.5% annualized, to $501.2 million at September 30, 2015, as compared to $479.1 million at June 30, 2015.    

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the composition of our gross loan portfolio by type:

 

 

Loan and Asset Quality – The ratio of NPAs, which include non-accrual loans, loans 90 days past due and still accruing, troubled debt restructured loans currently performing in accordance with renegotiated terms and foreclosed real estate, to total assets improved to 1.64% at September 30, 2015 from 2.02% at December 31, 2014.  NPAs decreased $1.5 million, or 12.2%, to $10.6 million at September 30, 2015, as compared to $12.0 million at December 31, 2014.  Non-accrual loans decreased $242 thousand, or 4.1%, to $5.7 million at September 30, 2015, as compared to $5.9 million at December 31, 2014.  The top five non-accrual loan relationships total $3.4 million, which equates to 59.9% of total non-accrual loans and 32.1% of total NPAs at September 30, 2015.  The remaining non-accrual loans at September 30, 2015 have an average loan balance of $91 thousand.  Loans past due 30 to 89 days decreased $3.2 million, or 56.8%, to $2.4 million at September 30, 2015, as compared to $5.6 million at December 31, 2014.    

We continue to actively market our foreclosed real estate properties, which decreased $1.1 million to $3.3 million at September 30, 2015, as compared to $4.4 million at December 31, 2014.  The decrease was primarily due to the sale of $2.0 million in foreclosed real estate properties and write-downs of $314 thousand during 2015, which were partially offset by $1.2 million in new foreclosed real estate properties.  At September 30, 2015, the Company’s foreclosed real estate properties had an average carrying value of approximately $278 thousand per property. 

 

The allowance for loan losses remained flat at $5.6 million, or 1.13% of total loans, at September 30, 2015, compared to $5.6 million, or 1.20% of total loans, at December 31, 2014. The Company recorded $506 thousand in provision for loan losses, which was offset by $506 thousand in net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-accrual loans increased to 99.3% at September 30, 2015 from 95.2% at December 31, 2014. 

 

Management continues to monitor our asset quality and believes that the NPAs are adequately collateralized and anticipated material losses have been adequately reserved for in the allowance for loan losses.  However, given the uncertainty of the current real estate market, additional provisions for losses may be deemed necessary in future periods.  The following table provides information regarding risk elements in the loan portfolio at each of the periods presented:

 

 

A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance, when based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan.  Total impaired loans at September 30, 2015 were $7.2 million and at December 31, 2014 were $7.5 million.  Impaired loans measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis increased to $1.5 million on September 30, 2015 from $1.1 million at December 31, 2014.   These balances consist of loans that were written down or required additional reserves during the periods ended September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.  Impaired loans include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.  These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection.  Not all impaired loans and restructured loans are on non-accrual, and therefore not all are considered non-performing loans.  Restructured loans still accruing totaled $1.6 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

 

We also continue to monitor our portfolio for potential problem loans. Potential problem loans are defined as loans which cause management to have serious concerns as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may cause the loan to be placed on non-accrual status. As of September 30, 2015,  we had

---

 

five loan relationships totaling $1.7 million that we deemed potential problem loans. Management is actively monitoring these loans.

 

Further detail of the credit quality of the loan portfolio is included in Note 4 –  Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality of Financing Receivables to our unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses – The allowance for loan losses consists of general, allocated and unallocated components.  The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired.  For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected losses derived from our internal risk rating process.  The unallocated component covers the potential for other adjustments that may be made to the allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risk rating data. 

 

Management regularly assesses the appropriateness and adequacy of the loan loss reserve in relation to credit exposure associated with individual borrowers, overall trends in the loan portfolio and other relevant factors, and believes the reserve is reasonable and adequate for each of the periods presented.

 

At September 30, 2015, the total allowance for loan losses remained flat at $5.6 million, or 1.13% of total loans, as compared to $5.6 million, or 1.20% of total loans, at December 31, 2014. The components of this increase were a provision for loan losses of $506 thousand, which was offset by $506 thousand in net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.  The provision also reflects the continued weakness in current real estate values in our market area and reduced cash flows to support the repayment of loans. 

 

The table below presents information regarding our provision and allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:

 

 

The table below presents details concerning the allocation of the allowance for loan losses to the various categories for each of the periods presented.  The allocation is made for analytical purposes and it is not necessarily indicative of the categories in which future credit losses may occur.  The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any category of loans.

 

 

Bank-Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”)  –  Our BOLI carrying value amounted to $12.4 million at September 30, 2015 and $12.2 million at December 31, 2014.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangibles – Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair market value of net assets acquired.  At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had recorded goodwill totaling $2.8 million, primarily as a result of the acquisition of Tri-State in 2001.  In accordance with U.S. GAAP, goodwill is not amortized, but evaluated at least annually for impairment.  Any impairment of goodwill results in a charge to income.  We

---

 

periodically assess whether events and changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of goodwill and intangible assets may be impaired.  The estimated fair value of the reporting segment exceeded its book value; therefore, no write-down of goodwill was required.  The goodwill related to the insurance agency is not deductible for tax purposes.

 

Deposits – Our total deposits increased $44.2 million, or 9.7%, to $502.5 million at September 30, 2015, from $458.3 million at December 31, 2014.  The increase in deposits was due to increases in both non-interest bearing deposits of $28.8 million, or 40.9%, and interest bearing deposits of $15.4 million, or 4.0%, for September 30, 2015, as compared to December 31, 2014.  Included in the aforementioned increase is $21.9 million in new deposits with a cost of under 0.50% attributed to our newest branch in Astoria, New York, which opened in mid-March of 2015.  During the third quarter of 2015, total deposits increased $14.8 million, or 12.0% annualized, to $502.5 million at September 30, 2015, as compared to $487.7 million at June 30, 2015 and was largely attributed to growth in non-interest bearing deposits.

 

Borrowings – Borrowings consist of short-term and long-term advances from the FHLB.  The advances are secured under terms of a blanket collateral agreement by a pledge of qualifying mortgage loans.  We had $71.3 million and $69.5 million in borrowings, at a weighted average interest rate of 2.20% at September 30, 2015 and 2.13% at December 31, 2014.  The long-term borrowings at September 30, 2015 consisted of $45.0 million of fixed rate advances and $11.0 million of advances with quarterly convertible options that allow the FHLB to change the note rate to a then current market rate.    

 

Junior Subordinated Debentures – On June 28, 2007, Sussex Capital Trust II (the “Trust”), a Delaware statutory business trust and our non-consolidated wholly owned subsidiary, issued $12.5 million of variable rate capital trust pass-through securities to investors.  The Trust purchased $12.9 million of variable rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures from us.  The debentures are the sole asset of the Trust.  The terms of the junior subordinated debentures are the same as the terms of the capital securities.  We have also fully and unconditionally guaranteed the obligations of the Trust under the capital securities.  The interest rate is based on the three-month LIBOR plus 144 basis points and adjusts quarterly.  The rate at September 30, 2015, was 1.78%.  The capital securities are currently redeemable by us at par in whole or in part.  The capital securities must be redeemed upon final maturity of the subordinated debentures on September 15, 2037.  The proceeds of these trust preferred securities, which have been contributed to the Bank, are included in the Bank’s capital ratio calculations and treated as Tier I capital.

 

In accordance with FASB ASC 810, Consolidations, our wholly owned subsidiary, the Trust, is not included in our consolidated financial statements.

 

Equity – Stockholders’ equity, inclusive of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income taxes, was $53.1 million at September 30, 2015, an increase of $1.9 million when compared to December 31, 2014.  The increase was largely due to net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. 

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

A fundamental component of our business strategy is to manage liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient resources to meet all financial obligations and to finance prospective business opportunities. Liquidity management is critical to our stability. Our liquidity position over any given period of time is a product of our operating, financing and investing activities. The extent of such activities is often shaped by such external factors as competition for deposits and loan demand.

 

Traditionally, financing for our loans and investments is derived primarily from deposits, along with interest and principal payments on loans and investments.  At September 30, 2015, total deposits amounted to $502.5 million, an increase of $44.2 million, or 9.7%, from December 31, 2014. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, advances from FHLB and subordinated debentures totaled $84.2 million and $82.4 million, respectively, and represented 13.1% and 13.8% of total assets, respectively. 

 

Loan production continued to be our principal investing activity. Total loans receivable, net of unearned income, at September 30, 2015, amounted to $501.2 million, an increase of $29.2 million, or 6.2%, compared to December 31, 2014.

 

Our most liquid assets are cash and due from banks and federal funds sold.  At September 30, 2015, the total of such assets amounted to $8.2 million, or 1.3%, of total assets, compared to $5.9 million, or 1.0%, of total assets at December 31, 2014. Another significant liquidity source is our available for sale securities portfolio.  At September 30, 2015, available for sale securities amounted to $94.7 million, compared to $78.0 million at December 31, 2014.

 

In addition to the aforementioned sources of liquidity, we have available various other sources of liquidity, including federal funds purchased from other banks and the FRB discount window.  The Bank also has the capacity to borrow an

---

 

additional $71.1 million through its membership in the FHLB and $10.0 million at Atlantic Community Bankers Bank at September 30, 2015.  Management believes that our sources of funds are sufficient to meet our present funding requirements.

 

The Bank’s regulators have implemented risk based guidelines that require banks to maintain Tier I capital as a percentage of risk-adjusted assets of 4.0% and Tier II capital as a percentage of risk-adjusted assets of 8.0% at a minimum.  At September 30, 2015, the Bank’s Tier I,  Tier II and Common Equity Tier I capital ratios were 12.39%, 13.52% and 12.39%, respectively.  In addition to the risk-based guidelines, the Bank’s regulators require that banks which meet the regulators’ highest performance and operational standards maintain a minimum leverage ratio (Tier I capital as a percentage of tangible assets) of 4.0%.  As of September 30, 2015, the Bank had a leverage ratio of 9.82%.  The Bank’s risk based and leverage ratios are in excess of those required to be considered “well-capitalized” under FDIC regulations.

 

The FRB also imposes similar capital requirements on bank holding companies with consolidated assets of $500 million or more. Under FRB reporting requirements, a bank holding company that reaches $500 million or more in total consolidated assets as of June 30 of the preceding year must begin reporting its consolidated capital beginning in March of the following year.  The Bank began reporting its consolidated capital in March 2013.

 

We have no investment or financial relationship with any unconsolidated entities that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on liquidity or the availability of capital resources, except for the trust preferred securities of the Trust.  We are not aware of any known trends or any known demands, commitments, events or uncertainties, which would result in any material increase or decrease in liquidity.  Management believes that any amounts actually drawn upon can be funded in the normal course of operations.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – Our consolidated financial statements do not reflect off-balance sheet arrangements that are made in the normal course of business.  These off-balance sheet arrangements consist of unfunded loans and letters of credit made under the same standards as on-balance sheet instruments.  These unused commitments, at September 30, 2015,  totaled $116.2 million and consisted of $61.8 million in commitments to grant commercial real estate, construction and land development loans, $21.3 million in home equity lines of credit, $32.2 million in other unused commitments and $839 thousand in letters of credit.  These instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of them will expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk to us.  Management believes that any amounts actually drawn upon can be funded in the normal course of operations.

 

Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 4 - Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely discussion regarding required disclosure.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

 

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings 

 

We are not involved in any legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business.   Management believes that such proceedings are, in the aggregate, immaterial to our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Item 1A - Risk Factors

 

For a summary of risk factors relevant to our operations, see Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  There are no material changes in the risk factors relevant to our operations.

 

Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

The following table provides information with respect to any purchase of shares of our common stock made by or on behalf of us or any “affiliated purchaser,” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, during the three months ended September  30, 2015:

 

 

 

(1) On February 25, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program, under which we may repurchase up to 233,000 shares.  The stock repurchase program expires on February 26, 2016, unless completed sooner or otherwise extended.

 

There were no sales by us of unregistered securities during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

 

 

Item 3 - Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 4 - Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 5 - Other Information

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 6 - Exhibits 

 

The exhibits required to be filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.

 

---

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

---

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

_______________________________

*  Furnished herewith and not deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act. 

---