|
One Market,
Spear Tower
Suite
2400
San
Francisco, CA 94105
|
April 9,
2009
To: PG&E
Corporation Institutional Investors
Re: Say
on Pay Shareholder Proposal
Dear
Shareholder:
We
are asking our shareholders to support management’s position and the
recommendation of the PG&E Corporation Board of Directors to vote AGAINST the
“Shareholder Say on Executive Pay” shareholder proposal that will be considered
at this year’s annual meeting because (1) the Corporation already has adopted a
say on pay policy, and (2) the shareholder proposal is overly restrictive in
that it does not allow shareholders to consider the full range of information
they need to provide meaningful feedback to the Corporation on executive
compensation.
As
you may know, PG&E Corporation recently adopted a policy providing
shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation starting in
2010. Our March 24, 2009 press release announcing this action is
attached. We value and look forward to our shareholders’ feedback on
this critical issue.
As
you weigh your vote on this shareholder proposal (Item No. 3 in our 2009 proxy
statement), please consider the following:
●
|
Next year, we
will begin asking for shareholder approval on PG&E Corporation’s
overall pay-for-performance compensation policies and procedures, as
described in the Compensation Disclosure and Analysis (CD&A) section
of the proxy, as well as the compensation tables and the accompanying
narrative. The shareholder proposal would restrict
shareholders’ comment to the Summary Compensation Table and the
accompanying narrative; it specifically
excludes consideration of the CD&A’s qualitative discussion of
compensation philosophies and policies. In our view,
shareholders should be encouraged and entitled to evaluate executive
compensation on a comprehensive basis. As drafted, the
shareholder proposal’s narrow parameters would result in a vote that would
be of limited value to shareholders and management
alike.
|
●
|
Since we have
adopted say on pay, the objective of the shareholder proposal has already
been achieved. Our say on pay vote will begin in the same year that is
contemplated by the shareholder proposal, namely
2010.
|
●
|
PG&E
Corporation has a track record of acting on shareholder majority-supported
recommendations. Our adoption of say on pay marks the fourth
time in recent years that we have acted on a shareholder proposal that
received a majority vote.
|
We
believe that the dialogue on say on pay is now focused on how to design and
implement the most effective approach to say on pay, i.e., how should say on pay
management proposals be structured so that shareholders provide boards with the
most effective feedback on executive compensation? PG&E intends
to be a leader in this area, as we are in many other aspects of corporate
governance. Our approach to say on pay, with its comprehensive focus,
is one example of the way we are already doing so.
With this in mind,
we look forward to your support for management’s recommendation with a vote
AGAINST the say
on pay shareholder proposal.
If
you have any questions, please contact our Corporate Secretary’s office at
either CorporateSecretary@pge-corp.com or 415-267-7070.
Sincerely,
PETER A. DARBEE
Peter A.
Darbee
Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer, and President
PG&E
Corporation
Attachment
|
|
Corporate
Relations
One
Market, Spear Tower
Suite
2400
San
Francisco, CA 94105
1-800-743-6397
|
|
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
CONTACT:
PG&E
Corporation
March 24,
2009
PG&E
TO GIVE SHAREHOLDERS ADVISORY VOTE ON
EXECUTIVE
PAY
(San Francisco) – PG&E
Corporation (NYSE:PCG) today announced that, beginning in 2010, it will seek
shareholders’ advisory vote on executive compensation each year at the company’s
annual meeting. In addition, PG&E Corporation’s utility unit, Pacific Gas
and Electric Company, has adopted the same policy. These advisory votes will be
taken into consideration by the Boards of Directors of PG&E Corporation and
Pacific Gas and Electric Company as they set future executive compensation
policies and levels.
“Extending
an opportunity for shareholders to weigh in on our compensation policies and
procedures is the right thing to do and will be a source of valuable input,”
said Peter A. Darbee, PG&E Corporation Chairman, CEO and President.
“PG&E’s compensation programs are designed to ensure that pay matches
performance and to align the interests of executives and investors. Asking for
shareholders’ input is good governance and an important way to hold ourselves
accountable for meeting these goals. It’s also consistent with our vision to be
the nation’s leading utility. ”
The
Boards' decision to adopt the new policy came in response to a majority vote at
PG&E Corporation’s 2008 annual meeting in favor of a shareholder proposal to
establish a “say on pay” advisory vote. That proposal was supported by 52.7
percent of shareholders who voted on the measure.
As a
result, next year PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company will
begin seeking shareholder approval of the companies’ overall pay-for-performance
compensation policies and practices, as described in detail each year in the
proxy statement. The companies will ask shareholders to review the “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis” in the proxy statement, as well as the specific
information reported in the compensation tables and related disclosures for
listed officers.
The
adoption of the “say on pay” policy in response to last year’s vote is the
fourth time in recent years that PG&E Corporation acted on a shareholder
proposal that received a majority vote. In 2006, the company adopted a
shareholder recommendation to establish a policy restricting so-called “golden
parachutes.” In 2004, the company adopted a shareholder recommendation to
eliminate its shareholder rights plan as well as a shareholder recommendation to
adopt a policy regarding future shareholder rights plans.
PG&E
Corporation’s performance on corporate governance issues has earned strong
ratings from key evaluators of corporate governance. PG&E recently received
Corporate Governance Quotient scores from RiskMetrics Group/Institutional
Shareholder Services (ISS) that were higher than those of 92.8 percent of the
utility companies in the S&P 500 index and 86.7 percent of all S&P 500
companies. GovernanceMetrics International awarded PG&E an overall
governance rating of 9.5 out of a possible 10.